Eurasia & Multipolarity
There's no freedom without national sovereignty.
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verifiedTrust
Not trustedLocation
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateAug 09, 2020
Added to TGlist
Oct 09, 2023Linked chat
Eurasian Wolfpack
1.1K
Records
15.10.202423:59
25.6KSubscribers07.12.202423:59
400Citation index21.11.202423:59
1.8KAverage views per post21.11.202423:59
1.9KAverage views per ad post27.02.202523:59
34.57%ER21.11.202423:59
6.98%ERRReposted from:
UKR LEAKS_eng
18.03.202510:52
French General Vincent Desportes is deeply concerned that today Putin and Trump will divide the world without the EU.
According to him, Europeans are in "the worst possible situation."
@ukr_leaks_eng
According to him, Europeans are in "the worst possible situation."
"We are indeed in the worst position. There is nothing at stake for us, nor for the Ukrainians,"he said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
Reposted from:
Beorn and The Shieldmaiden
07.04.202521:57
The text of Hitler’s statement on the extermination of Slavic peoples has been published in Russia for the first time
We have published a new translation at Beorn's Beehive. Here we present a portion of the article and the document in question.
Yegor Yakovlev, an expert at the "Russian Military Historical Society" and head of the "Digital History" project, found the recording of the negotiations and translated its full text into Russian for the first time. The document is published on the portal HISTORY.RF. The original of the so-called “meeting record” is kept in the archives of the "National Council for the Study of Security Archives" in Bucharest.
During Mihai Antonescu’s conversation with Adolf Hitler in Berlin on November 27, 1941, the Romanian leadership discussed issues that were of great concern. The first part of the recording is devoted to Romanian-Hungarian relations, which, despite the presence of both countries in the orbit of Nazi Germany, were extremely tense. In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Arbitration, Hungary took over Northern Transylvania from Romania with a mixed Romanian-Hungarian population. In this dispute, the Nazi leadership sided with the Hungarians, promising compensation to the Romanians at the expense of the USSR. However, despite these promises, the loss of Northern Transylvania was felt very painfully in Bucharest. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer about the severe discrimination of Romanians in the excluded region, asking him to intervene and achieve a “fair solution”.
The second part of the dialogue was entirely devoted to the “Slavic question”. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer that Romania was a categorical opposed to the creation of an independent Ukraine, of which projects he was aware. The Romanian politician pointed out that Slavs are a huge “biological problem” for Europe, referring to the large number of “primitive” Slavic populations that are incompatible with European culture and civilisation. If, after the defeat of the USSR, an independent Ukraine appears, according to Antonescu, it will begin to draw the rest of the Eastern Slavs into its orbit and turn into a new threat to Europe. This, the Romanian Foreign Minister argued, should not be allowed.
Key fragments from the document:
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀Boost🚀
We have published a new translation at Beorn's Beehive. Here we present a portion of the article and the document in question.
Yegor Yakovlev, an expert at the "Russian Military Historical Society" and head of the "Digital History" project, found the recording of the negotiations and translated its full text into Russian for the first time. The document is published on the portal HISTORY.RF. The original of the so-called “meeting record” is kept in the archives of the "National Council for the Study of Security Archives" in Bucharest.
During Mihai Antonescu’s conversation with Adolf Hitler in Berlin on November 27, 1941, the Romanian leadership discussed issues that were of great concern. The first part of the recording is devoted to Romanian-Hungarian relations, which, despite the presence of both countries in the orbit of Nazi Germany, were extremely tense. In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Arbitration, Hungary took over Northern Transylvania from Romania with a mixed Romanian-Hungarian population. In this dispute, the Nazi leadership sided with the Hungarians, promising compensation to the Romanians at the expense of the USSR. However, despite these promises, the loss of Northern Transylvania was felt very painfully in Bucharest. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer about the severe discrimination of Romanians in the excluded region, asking him to intervene and achieve a “fair solution”.
The second part of the dialogue was entirely devoted to the “Slavic question”. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer that Romania was a categorical opposed to the creation of an independent Ukraine, of which projects he was aware. The Romanian politician pointed out that Slavs are a huge “biological problem” for Europe, referring to the large number of “primitive” Slavic populations that are incompatible with European culture and civilisation. If, after the defeat of the USSR, an independent Ukraine appears, according to Antonescu, it will begin to draw the rest of the Eastern Slavs into its orbit and turn into a new threat to Europe. This, the Romanian Foreign Minister argued, should not be allowed.
Key fragments from the document:
The large and primitive Slavic mass is not a spiritual problem for Europe, but a serious biological problem related to the European birth rate. It is necessary to find radical and serious solutions to this problem, and I believe that all European states should be involved in this activity...
The joining of Latinism, on a racial basis, to the actions of Germanism against the Slavs seems to me to be a necessity of the first order, and the position regarding the Slavs should be unshakable, any formula for separation, neutralisation, occupation of Slavic territories is legitimate.
[...]
The Fuhrer began with a heated discussion of the great Slavic problem, giving me the honour on three occasions to accept my point of view on European reconstruction. As a basis for the conversation, the Fuhrer openly told me:
“You are right, the Slavic problem is biological, not ideological, as you said, and the fight against the Slavs should be waged by all Europeans.”
In the future Europe there should be only two races: Latin and Germanic. These two races must work together in Russia to destroy (literally: dărâma, that is “demolish”) the Slavs. We cannot march out against Russia with legal or political formulas, because the Russian problem is much more serious than many people think, and we must find solutions to colonise and biologically eliminate the Slavs.
That is why all European nations should work together in the fight against the Slavs, and tomorrow jointly transform Russia for Europe.
Why should the Belgians have 224 inhabitants per square kilometer when there are such huge spaces in Russia?
Why should my West Germans live in difficult conditions when the spaces in the East offer them a future?
My mission, the Fuhrer said, if I succeed, is to destroy the Slavs.
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀Boost🚀
Reposted from:
DD Geopolitics
Could not access
the media content
the media content
30.03.202513:32
🇺🇸💥🇾🇪 While they bomb them.
You would think this is a parody account. But it's not.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
You would think this is a parody account. But it's not.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Reposted from:
TASS Russian news agency
16.03.202521:49
Britain's desire to seize Russia's assets stems from a long tradition of piracy in England, which has become a hallmark of the British crown, alongside "robbery and murder," Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.
Earlier, former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called for the swift appropriation of billions of dollars worth of Russian assets.
"This is one of the English traditions, akin to afternoon tea and horse racing. The fact is that piracy was effectively legalized in England," Zakharova wrote on her Telegram channel. "Pirates were prohibited from attacking English ships but were permitted to rob those of rival nations. It is a case of ‘immoral morality’,” she noted.
Earlier, former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called for the swift appropriation of billions of dollars worth of Russian assets.
Reposted from:DD Geopolitics
10.03.202522:44
🇸🇾🇷🇺 Scenes from Russia's Hmeimim Airbase
Thousands of Syrian civilians, primarily Alawites and Christians, have sought refuge at Russia’s Hmeimim Airbase as violence escalates across the country. The displacement follows the massacres carried out by HTS-aligned militants, forcing families to flee for their lives. Russian forces have stepped in to provide shelter, food, and medical aid, as the humanitarian crisis deepens.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Thousands of Syrian civilians, primarily Alawites and Christians, have sought refuge at Russia’s Hmeimim Airbase as violence escalates across the country. The displacement follows the massacres carried out by HTS-aligned militants, forcing families to flee for their lives. Russian forces have stepped in to provide shelter, food, and medical aid, as the humanitarian crisis deepens.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Reposted from:
Russian MFA 🇷🇺
13.03.202510:43
🎙 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s interview to the US bloggers Mario Naufal, Larri Johnson and Andrew Napolitano (Moscow, March 12, 2025)
Key talking points:
• I think what is going on in the United States is a return to normalcy. <...> The fact is that a normal administration without any, you know, unchristian ideas came to power and the reaction was such an explosion in the media, in the politics all over the world is very interesting and very telling.
• When we met in Riyadh with Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz and Steve Witkoff they suggested the meeting and they said, look, we want normal relations in the sense that the foundation of the American foreign policy under the Donald Trump administration is the national interest of the United States. But at the same time, we understand that other countries also have their national interest.
• It is very well understood that countries like the United States and Russia would never have their national interest the same. They would not coincide maybe even 50 or less percent. But when they do coincide this situation must be used to develop this simultaneous and similar interest. But when the interests do not coincide and contradict each other then the responsible countries must do everything not to allow this contradiction to degenerate into confrontation, especially military confrontation which would be disastrous for many other countries.
• The beginning of the special military operation was a decision because all other attempts, all other alternatives to bring things into some positive dimension failed for ten years after the illegal coup in Kiev, in violation of the deal signed the night before and guaranteed by the Germans, French and Poles.
• I don't think the Americans would drop from NATO. At least President Trump never hinted that this might be the case. But what he did bluntly say was that if you want us to protect you, to give you security guarantees, you pay what is necessary.
• But President Trump doesn't want to provide these security guarantees to Ukraine under Zelensky. He has his own view of the situation which he bluntly presents every now and then, that this war should never have started – that pulling Ukraine into NATO in violation of its Constitution, in violation of the Declaration of Independence of 1991, on the basis of which we recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state. For several reasons including that this Declaration was saying no NATO, no blocs, neutral status. Another thing which this Declaration also confirmed and solidified - all rights of Russian and all other national minorities are to be respected.
• Europe and the UK they certainly want this to continue. The way they received Zelensky in London after the scandal in Washington, it's an indication that they want to raise the stakes and they are preparing something to pressure the Donald Trump administration back into some aggressive action against Russia.
• It's not about the territories, it's about the people who were deprived of their history by law. Territories are important only because people live on these territories. The people who live on the territories are descendants of those who for hundreds of years were building Odessa & other cities on those very lands who were building ports, roads, who were founding those lands and who associated with the history of this land.
❗️ The Americans know that we would not betray our commitments, legal commitments, the political commitments which we develop with China.
Read in full
Key talking points:
• I think what is going on in the United States is a return to normalcy. <...> The fact is that a normal administration without any, you know, unchristian ideas came to power and the reaction was such an explosion in the media, in the politics all over the world is very interesting and very telling.
• When we met in Riyadh with Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz and Steve Witkoff they suggested the meeting and they said, look, we want normal relations in the sense that the foundation of the American foreign policy under the Donald Trump administration is the national interest of the United States. But at the same time, we understand that other countries also have their national interest.
• It is very well understood that countries like the United States and Russia would never have their national interest the same. They would not coincide maybe even 50 or less percent. But when they do coincide this situation must be used to develop this simultaneous and similar interest. But when the interests do not coincide and contradict each other then the responsible countries must do everything not to allow this contradiction to degenerate into confrontation, especially military confrontation which would be disastrous for many other countries.
• The beginning of the special military operation was a decision because all other attempts, all other alternatives to bring things into some positive dimension failed for ten years after the illegal coup in Kiev, in violation of the deal signed the night before and guaranteed by the Germans, French and Poles.
• I don't think the Americans would drop from NATO. At least President Trump never hinted that this might be the case. But what he did bluntly say was that if you want us to protect you, to give you security guarantees, you pay what is necessary.
• But President Trump doesn't want to provide these security guarantees to Ukraine under Zelensky. He has his own view of the situation which he bluntly presents every now and then, that this war should never have started – that pulling Ukraine into NATO in violation of its Constitution, in violation of the Declaration of Independence of 1991, on the basis of which we recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state. For several reasons including that this Declaration was saying no NATO, no blocs, neutral status. Another thing which this Declaration also confirmed and solidified - all rights of Russian and all other national minorities are to be respected.
• Europe and the UK they certainly want this to continue. The way they received Zelensky in London after the scandal in Washington, it's an indication that they want to raise the stakes and they are preparing something to pressure the Donald Trump administration back into some aggressive action against Russia.
• It's not about the territories, it's about the people who were deprived of their history by law. Territories are important only because people live on these territories. The people who live on the territories are descendants of those who for hundreds of years were building Odessa & other cities on those very lands who were building ports, roads, who were founding those lands and who associated with the history of this land.
❗️ The Americans know that we would not betray our commitments, legal commitments, the political commitments which we develop with China.
Read in full
Reposted from:
Slavyangrad
12.03.202509:22
Russia will not under any circumstances accept the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine as "peacekeepers" who would "protect the Nazi regime in the remnants of the country", Lavrov has said.
Lavrov's statement makes it very clear that Moscow will not accept any format of NATO "peacekeepers" in Ukraine and that any form of discussion on this topic is useless. In diplomatic language, this is a firm signal that any attempts by the West to introduce a contingent under any pretext - be it "security guarantees", "separation of sides" or "protection of civilians" - will be regarded as direct military intervention with the corresponding consequences.
From the point of view of the negotiation process, this statement further narrows the room for maneuver. Peace talks between Russia and Ukraine have long been effectively blocked, and this signal only emphasizes that any initiatives that include NATO involvement in the conflict will be automatically rejected.
What now? Western countries, especially Poland and the Baltic states, will continue to push the idea of introducing a military contingent into Ukraine. This is an attempt to secure at least part of the territory for themselves in case the Ukrainian front collapses. However, the Kremlin is making it clear with this statement that such a scenario will only lead to escalation, not peace.
Kiev itself is likely to continue to cling to any Western initiatives, hoping to prolong the war and strengthen its position by retaining power. But after this statement, the West has only one option left - either to go for a direct confrontation or to look for another way of settlement without NATO's military presence.
In fact, Russia's position remains unchanged: no Western-style "freezing" of the conflict, no NATO peacekeeping, no negotiation process in which Ukraine will dictate terms based on the alliance's support.
Military Chronicle
@Slavyangrad
Lavrov's statement makes it very clear that Moscow will not accept any format of NATO "peacekeepers" in Ukraine and that any form of discussion on this topic is useless. In diplomatic language, this is a firm signal that any attempts by the West to introduce a contingent under any pretext - be it "security guarantees", "separation of sides" or "protection of civilians" - will be regarded as direct military intervention with the corresponding consequences.
From the point of view of the negotiation process, this statement further narrows the room for maneuver. Peace talks between Russia and Ukraine have long been effectively blocked, and this signal only emphasizes that any initiatives that include NATO involvement in the conflict will be automatically rejected.
What now? Western countries, especially Poland and the Baltic states, will continue to push the idea of introducing a military contingent into Ukraine. This is an attempt to secure at least part of the territory for themselves in case the Ukrainian front collapses. However, the Kremlin is making it clear with this statement that such a scenario will only lead to escalation, not peace.
Kiev itself is likely to continue to cling to any Western initiatives, hoping to prolong the war and strengthen its position by retaining power. But after this statement, the West has only one option left - either to go for a direct confrontation or to look for another way of settlement without NATO's military presence.
In fact, Russia's position remains unchanged: no Western-style "freezing" of the conflict, no NATO peacekeeping, no negotiation process in which Ukraine will dictate terms based on the alliance's support.
Military Chronicle
@Slavyangrad
Reposted from:TASS Russian news agency
02.04.202516:28
🇷🇺🇮🇷 Moscow and Tehran will not accept outside threats to bomb Iran's nuclear and energy infrastructure, the Russian Foreign Ministry said.
Russia and Iran have confirmed the course towards searching for viable negotiated solutions on Iran's nuclear program, the ministry stated.
Russia and Iran have confirmed the course towards searching for viable negotiated solutions on Iran's nuclear program, the ministry stated.
Reposted from:
Angelo Giuliano 🇮🇹🇨🇭
03.04.202506:22
Top 30 Countries Exporting to the USA and Trade Dependency Analysis
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
Reposted from:Angelo Giuliano 🇮🇹🇨🇭
03.04.202500:45
The European Union, once a symbol of democracy, is turning authoritarian. “Lawfare”—using laws to attack political enemies—is now a tool to silence opposition. U.S. Vice President JD Vance warned about this in February 2025 at the Munich Security Conference. He said the EU is crushing free speech and democracy. Many laughed then, but not now.
Look at the evidence. In France, Marine Le Pen, a major politician, was banned from the 2027 election over a legal case—convenient timing to stop her. Romania canceled its election, detained the winner, and blocked him from running. Germany is targeting the Alternative für Deutschland party, which Vance called a real voice for people. Slovakia’s leader, Robert Fico, survived an assassination attempt after opposing war. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán faces EU threats despite his voters’ support. Estonia banned 25% of its Russian speakers from voting. Ukraine and Moldova are cracking down too.
This isn’t new. The EU began in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome, pushed by the U.S. to control Europe. Jean Monnet, funded by the CIA, and Walter Hallstein, a former Nazi, shaped it to weaken nations. Today, the EU uses courts and rules to force its way, ignoring votes—like France’s in 2005 or Greece’s in 2015. Vance is right: this isn’t democracy. It’s power. Will Europeans fight back?
Look at the evidence. In France, Marine Le Pen, a major politician, was banned from the 2027 election over a legal case—convenient timing to stop her. Romania canceled its election, detained the winner, and blocked him from running. Germany is targeting the Alternative für Deutschland party, which Vance called a real voice for people. Slovakia’s leader, Robert Fico, survived an assassination attempt after opposing war. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán faces EU threats despite his voters’ support. Estonia banned 25% of its Russian speakers from voting. Ukraine and Moldova are cracking down too.
This isn’t new. The EU began in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome, pushed by the U.S. to control Europe. Jean Monnet, funded by the CIA, and Walter Hallstein, a former Nazi, shaped it to weaken nations. Today, the EU uses courts and rules to force its way, ignoring votes—like France’s in 2005 or Greece’s in 2015. Vance is right: this isn’t democracy. It’s power. Will Europeans fight back?
Reposted from:
MT News
03.04.202511:59
Russia barely trades with the US or the EU anyway, so there’s no need to fuss over it — Medvedev on Trump's tarrifs
'We’ll take the advice of Lao Tzu and sit by the river, waiting for the body of the enemy to float by. The decaying corpse of the EU economy'
@MTodayNews
'We’ll take the advice of Lao Tzu and sit by the river, waiting for the body of the enemy to float by. The decaying corpse of the EU economy'
@MTodayNews
Reposted from:
LauraAboli
Could not access
the media content
the media content
26.03.202519:23
In layman’s terms - there is no capacity to suppress tumours after getting the mRNA covid shots and they contain SV40 which is a ‘known tumour gene promoter’.
No wonder we are seeing ‘turbo cancers’.
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
No wonder we are seeing ‘turbo cancers’.
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
Reposted from:
Lord Bebo & Friends
23.03.202522:13
🇺🇦🇷🇺🇬🇧
— BBC 3 years ago
So the Russian army starved and ran out of ammunition already … good to know.
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
“Russian army has food and ammunition for 3 days”
— BBC 3 years ago
So the Russian army starved and ran out of ammunition already … good to know.
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
Reposted from:
Cute and Fun Videos 🥰
01.04.202521:54
❤️
💥more such 😍 videos can be found here at CuteAndFunVideos
❤️
💥more such 😍 videos can be found here at CuteAndFunVideos
❤️
Log in to unlock more functionality.
