Angelo Giuliano 🇮🇹🇨🇭
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verifiedTrust
Not trustedLocation
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateJan 20, 2021
Added to TGlist
Jun 26, 2024Linked chat
Records
02.04.202523:59
2.3KSubscribers25.03.202523:59
200Citation index29.03.202523:59
1.7KAverage views per post03.04.202518:38
1.6KAverage views per ad post16.03.202519:20
176.47%ER29.03.202523:59
74.97%ERR
04.04.202504:43
Will be in Moscow for Victory DAY. Will be filming, interviewing and writing about it.
For the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over NAZI Germany.
Special moment
For the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over NAZI Germany.
Special moment
29.03.202502:55
Translation >
"Hey orange man, you can talk as much as you want, I hold the cards and I will have the final say....in the meantime you can talk and I will pretend to listen"
"And yes....I don't mind if you are antigonising with EU, with the btches Starmer and Macron"
"Hey orange man, you can talk as much as you want, I hold the cards and I will have the final say....in the meantime you can talk and I will pretend to listen"
"And yes....I don't mind if you are antigonising with EU, with the btches Starmer and Macron"
Reposted from:
Angelo Giuliano 🇮🇹🇨🇭
10.04.202503:19
In case you wonder about Chinese resolve and determination when facing Trump.
It is a proud civilisation state who won't be bullied.
Trump has no clue, his ego, arrogance, and ignorance are emblematic of US society zombified by their sense for superiority and messianic of "manifest destiny"
MAGA is just a slogan here, an experiment of a declining Empire while on the other side, China has been working on Making China great again for 50 years, it was all doing and less talk.
It was hard work, cohesion and scientific/pragmatic approach.
With Trump it is about bumping chest, flexing muscles and talk and talk and talk.
It is a proud civilisation state who won't be bullied.
Trump has no clue, his ego, arrogance, and ignorance are emblematic of US society zombified by their sense for superiority and messianic of "manifest destiny"
MAGA is just a slogan here, an experiment of a declining Empire while on the other side, China has been working on Making China great again for 50 years, it was all doing and less talk.
It was hard work, cohesion and scientific/pragmatic approach.
With Trump it is about bumping chest, flexing muscles and talk and talk and talk.
Reposted from:
Sputnik International
09.04.202507:23
🇨🇳🇺🇸China's rare metal restrictions: a NAIL IN THE COFFIN for US military industry?
China’s sanctions on Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, plus new restrictions on rare earths and dual-use tech, are seriously disrupting US supply chains dependent on Chinese resources, says analyst Angelo Giuliano.
Giuliano predicts that these restrictions will cause defense production costs to soar, delaying advanced equipment like aircraft and missiles. The US isn’t ready to ditch China as a trade partner in this crucial sector.
🤔 Temporary dislocation? 🌍
Ex-DoD analyst Michael Maloof believes China’s move will cause a “temporary dislocation,” but the US will likely seek alternatives in Latin America, Ukraine, or even Russia before ramping up domestic mining. The fix won’t be quick.
✅Scandium: aerospace woes ✈️
Scandium is essential for aluminum alloys in aviation and rocketry. Restrictions on this rare metal could hit US aerospace hard, as it's key for "extreme strength and low weight," says rare earths expert Ruslan Dimukhamedov.
✅Dysprosium: hot stuff 🔥
Dysprosium is needed for heat-resistant neodymium magnets. Without it, critical defense tech like missiles would face overheating issues. A major concern for defense and tech industries.
✅Samarium: defense needs 🛡
Samarium’s temperature-resistant magnets are used in missile guidance systems and oil wells. Losing access could compromise defense tech, aerospace, and energy sectors.
✅Gadolinium: avoid nuclear crisis ☢️
Gadolinium plays a critical role in nuclear reactors, improving uranium burn-up and lifespan. Restrictions on gadolinium could hit the US’s civilian nuclear sector hard.
✅Terbium: lighting the way 💡
Terbium is key for lighting applications like spotlights and displays. A slow down in production would impact the defense and tech industries.
✅Yttrium: aerospace advantage 🚀
Yttrium is used in aerospace ceramics and heat protection. Losing access could ground key projects like aircraft engines and space tech.
📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt
China’s sanctions on Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, plus new restrictions on rare earths and dual-use tech, are seriously disrupting US supply chains dependent on Chinese resources, says analyst Angelo Giuliano.
Giuliano predicts that these restrictions will cause defense production costs to soar, delaying advanced equipment like aircraft and missiles. The US isn’t ready to ditch China as a trade partner in this crucial sector.
🤔 Temporary dislocation? 🌍
Ex-DoD analyst Michael Maloof believes China’s move will cause a “temporary dislocation,” but the US will likely seek alternatives in Latin America, Ukraine, or even Russia before ramping up domestic mining. The fix won’t be quick.
✅Scandium: aerospace woes ✈️
Scandium is essential for aluminum alloys in aviation and rocketry. Restrictions on this rare metal could hit US aerospace hard, as it's key for "extreme strength and low weight," says rare earths expert Ruslan Dimukhamedov.
✅Dysprosium: hot stuff 🔥
Dysprosium is needed for heat-resistant neodymium magnets. Without it, critical defense tech like missiles would face overheating issues. A major concern for defense and tech industries.
✅Samarium: defense needs 🛡
Samarium’s temperature-resistant magnets are used in missile guidance systems and oil wells. Losing access could compromise defense tech, aerospace, and energy sectors.
✅Gadolinium: avoid nuclear crisis ☢️
Gadolinium plays a critical role in nuclear reactors, improving uranium burn-up and lifespan. Restrictions on gadolinium could hit the US’s civilian nuclear sector hard.
✅Terbium: lighting the way 💡
Terbium is key for lighting applications like spotlights and displays. A slow down in production would impact the defense and tech industries.
✅Yttrium: aerospace advantage 🚀
Yttrium is used in aerospace ceramics and heat protection. Losing access could ground key projects like aircraft engines and space tech.
📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt
25.03.202503:28
# Project 2025: A Power Grab Fueled by Thiel’s Surveillance AI and the Risk of a Dystopian Future
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/project-2025-a-power-grab-fueled?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/project-2025-a-power-grab-fueled?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
10.04.202503:19
In case you wonder about Chinese resolve and determination when facing Trump.
It is a proud civilisation state who won't be bullied.
Trump has no clue, his ego, arrogance, and ignorance are emblematic of US society zombified by their sense for superiority and messianic of "manifest destiny"
MAGA is just a slogan here, an experiment of a declining Empire while on the other side, China has been working on Making China great again for 50 years, it was all doing and less talk.
It was hard work, cohesion and scientific/pragmatic approach.
With Trump it is about bumping chest, flexing muscles and talk and talk and talk.
It is a proud civilisation state who won't be bullied.
Trump has no clue, his ego, arrogance, and ignorance are emblematic of US society zombified by their sense for superiority and messianic of "manifest destiny"
MAGA is just a slogan here, an experiment of a declining Empire while on the other side, China has been working on Making China great again for 50 years, it was all doing and less talk.
It was hard work, cohesion and scientific/pragmatic approach.
With Trump it is about bumping chest, flexing muscles and talk and talk and talk.
03.04.202506:22
Top 30 Countries Exporting to the USA and Trade Dependency Analysis
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
20.03.202504:07
China’s Trade Ascendancy: Outmaneuvering a Declining U.S. in a Multipolar World
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/chinas-trade-ascendancy-outmaneuvering?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/chinas-trade-ascendancy-outmaneuvering?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Log in to unlock more functionality.
