New Rules
New Rules examines the geopolitical, economic, ideological trends changing the world.
NR on X: http://x.com/newrulesgeo
NR on X: http://x.com/newrulesgeo
TGlist рейтингі
0
0
ТүріҚоғамдық
Растау
РасталмағанСенімділік
СенімсізОрналасқан жеріРосія
ТілБасқа
Канал құрылған күніСіч 28, 2025
TGlist-ке қосылған күні
Лют 04, 2025Қосылған топ
New Rules Chat
31
Жазылушылар
3 741
24 сағат
130.3%Апта
2577.4%Ай
92632.9%
Дәйексөз индексі
50
Ескертулер1Каналдарда қайта жазылу0Каналдарда ескерту1
1 жазбаның орташа қамтуы
4 447
12 сағат1 613
169.8%24 сағат4 447
643.6%48 сағат1 210
68.8%
Қатысу деңгейі (ER)
4.52%
Қайта жазылды21Пікірлер3Реакциялар17
Қамту бойынша қатысу деңгейі (ERR)
16.04%
24 сағат0%Апта
9.25%Ай
8.12%
1 жарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы
4 447
1 сағат63514.28%1 – 4 сағат4399.87%4 - 24 сағат7 523169.17%
24 сағаттағы жазбалар саны
2
Динамика
2
"New Rules" тобындағы соңғы жазбалар
13.04.202513:59
🚨🇺🇦🪖Zelensky’s Zoomer Recruitment Drive Falls Flat
Less than 500 Ukrainians aged 18 to 24 signed military contracts despite the Zelensky regime promising a 1 million hryvnia ($24,000) payout and a massive propaganda campaign.
This should tell you how Ukrainians really feel about the war. They be willing to wish death to Russians online, but they’re not willing to risk their lives on the battlefield.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Less than 500 Ukrainians aged 18 to 24 signed military contracts despite the Zelensky regime promising a 1 million hryvnia ($24,000) payout and a massive propaganda campaign.
This should tell you how Ukrainians really feel about the war. They be willing to wish death to Russians online, but they’re not willing to risk their lives on the battlefield.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
13.04.202512:00
🚨🇪🇺🇨🇳European Union pivot to China will FAIL — Here’s why
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez travelled to Beijing to help broker a European-Chinese rapprochement amid Trump’s tariff threats. The EU has also signalled its willingness to soften its current tariff regime against Chinese-made electronic vehicles.
On the one hand, drawing closer to China is a no brainier for the Europeans. But the problem is that the Europeans won’t get much benefits from this shift unless they simultaneously NORMALIZE RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA.
Europe is an export-centered economy, but they can’t compete with Chinese manufacturing prowess unless they lower energy prices. Europe won’t be able to lower energy prices unless they remove sanctions and restore trade with Russia.
The Europeans also plan on going into massive debt in order to prepare for a military showdown with Russia and rebuild Ukraine. Needless to say, this won’t help them to regain their global economic competitiveness.
But I think it’s fair to say that the Europeans won’t abandon their hysterical Russophobia. In the end, the Chinese will simply offload their excess manufacturing good onto European markets, while the continent will continue to deindustrialize.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez travelled to Beijing to help broker a European-Chinese rapprochement amid Trump’s tariff threats. The EU has also signalled its willingness to soften its current tariff regime against Chinese-made electronic vehicles.
On the one hand, drawing closer to China is a no brainier for the Europeans. But the problem is that the Europeans won’t get much benefits from this shift unless they simultaneously NORMALIZE RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA.
Europe is an export-centered economy, but they can’t compete with Chinese manufacturing prowess unless they lower energy prices. Europe won’t be able to lower energy prices unless they remove sanctions and restore trade with Russia.
The Europeans also plan on going into massive debt in order to prepare for a military showdown with Russia and rebuild Ukraine. Needless to say, this won’t help them to regain their global economic competitiveness.
But I think it’s fair to say that the Europeans won’t abandon their hysterical Russophobia. In the end, the Chinese will simply offload their excess manufacturing good onto European markets, while the continent will continue to deindustrialize.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
12.04.202513:59
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Message to Trump: YOU’RE NOT FOOLING ANYBODY
Iran doesn’t believe Trump genuinely wants a new nuclear deal.
They suspect he’s just using the nuclear talks as “political theater.” Once they inevitably fail due to unreasonable US demands, Trump can use that as a pretext for war against Iran.
👉 Watch full interview here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Iran doesn’t believe Trump genuinely wants a new nuclear deal.
They suspect he’s just using the nuclear talks as “political theater.” Once they inevitably fail due to unreasonable US demands, Trump can use that as a pretext for war against Iran.
👉 Watch full interview here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
12.04.202512:00
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷US and Iran are holding nuclear talks in Oman today
Iran is coming into these negotiations with steep demands for Trump:
🔸Remove sanctions against critical economic sectors
🔸Reconnect Iran to SWIFT banking payments system
🔸No new sanctions
🔸Snapback clauses in case the US reneges on its obligations under the nuclear deal again
🔸No restrictions against Iran’s civilian nuclear program
Don’t expect to Iran to roll over before Trump. They can clearly see US weakness.
👉 Watch full interview here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Iran is coming into these negotiations with steep demands for Trump:
🔸Remove sanctions against critical economic sectors
🔸Reconnect Iran to SWIFT banking payments system
🔸No new sanctions
🔸Snapback clauses in case the US reneges on its obligations under the nuclear deal again
🔸No restrictions against Iran’s civilian nuclear program
Don’t expect to Iran to roll over before Trump. They can clearly see US weakness.
👉 Watch full interview here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
11.04.202517:59
🚨🇺🇲📊Tech's Trump Loyalists Pay Price: Tariffs Wipe Out Fortunes
Trump Tech moguls supporters saw their fortunes plummet as stocks tanked, with the Dow down 4%, S&P 500 off 5%, and Nasdaq crashing 6% due to disrupted global supply chains.
Let's check one by one:
🔸Mark Zuckerberg (Meta): Lost $17.9–27B (stock down 9–14%). China-heavy VR and cloud hardware stung, despite $1M Trump donation.
🔸Jeff Bezos (Amazon): Down $15.9–16B (stock fell 9%). Tariffed Chinese sellers and cloud components hurt, even with $1M inauguration gift.
🔸Elon Musk (Tesla): Shed $8.7–11B (stock dropped 5.5%). Imported chips hit Tesla, despite $290M campaign support.
🔸Tim Cook (Apple): Billions in market cap gone (stock down 9%+). China manufacturing reliance exposed, despite $1M donation.
🔸Jensen Huang (Nvidia): Lost $5–10B (stock off 5%). Taiwan exemption helped, but broader tariffs still bit.
Tariffs don’t spare allies. Supporters like Musk and Zuckerberg lost big alongside others, as tech’s Asian supply chains buckled. A $536B billionaire wealth drop signals pain ahead unless exemptions or reshoring kick in fast.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Trump Tech moguls supporters saw their fortunes plummet as stocks tanked, with the Dow down 4%, S&P 500 off 5%, and Nasdaq crashing 6% due to disrupted global supply chains.
Let's check one by one:
🔸Mark Zuckerberg (Meta): Lost $17.9–27B (stock down 9–14%). China-heavy VR and cloud hardware stung, despite $1M Trump donation.
🔸Jeff Bezos (Amazon): Down $15.9–16B (stock fell 9%). Tariffed Chinese sellers and cloud components hurt, even with $1M inauguration gift.
🔸Elon Musk (Tesla): Shed $8.7–11B (stock dropped 5.5%). Imported chips hit Tesla, despite $290M campaign support.
🔸Tim Cook (Apple): Billions in market cap gone (stock down 9%+). China manufacturing reliance exposed, despite $1M donation.
🔸Jensen Huang (Nvidia): Lost $5–10B (stock off 5%). Taiwan exemption helped, but broader tariffs still bit.
Tariffs don’t spare allies. Supporters like Musk and Zuckerberg lost big alongside others, as tech’s Asian supply chains buckled. A $536B billionaire wealth drop signals pain ahead unless exemptions or reshoring kick in fast.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
11.04.202515:59
🚨🇺🇲🏭Did Trump really want to protect US companies?
Tariffs are squeezing American companies, hiking costs and disrupting supply chains. Here’s a quick look at the impact on them:
🔸Amazon: Tariffs on Chinese goods hit its low-cost marketplace model. Losing the $800 duty-free exemption could force price hikes or margin cuts, risking stock shortages.
🔸Apple: 104% tariffs on China and 26-46% on India/Vietnam raise iPhone and MacBook costs. Prices may jump 6-30%
🔸Walmart: Duties on Asian imports like clothing threaten its low-price edge. Prices may rise $2,500-$5,000 per household, hitting budget shoppers.
🔸Nike: 46% Vietnam tariffs and 104% China duties spike shoe costs. Price hikes could dent demand, with a $13B market value loss already.
🔸Ford: 25% tariffs on Canada/Mexico parts could add $2,500-$20,000 to car prices. Exports face retaliatory tariff risks.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Tariffs are squeezing American companies, hiking costs and disrupting supply chains. Here’s a quick look at the impact on them:
🔸Amazon: Tariffs on Chinese goods hit its low-cost marketplace model. Losing the $800 duty-free exemption could force price hikes or margin cuts, risking stock shortages.
🔸Apple: 104% tariffs on China and 26-46% on India/Vietnam raise iPhone and MacBook costs. Prices may jump 6-30%
🔸Walmart: Duties on Asian imports like clothing threaten its low-price edge. Prices may rise $2,500-$5,000 per household, hitting budget shoppers.
🔸Nike: 46% Vietnam tariffs and 104% China duties spike shoe costs. Price hikes could dent demand, with a $13B market value loss already.
🔸Ford: 25% tariffs on Canada/Mexico parts could add $2,500-$20,000 to car prices. Exports face retaliatory tariff risks.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
11.04.202514:00
🚨🇺🇲🇮🇷US-Iran War: The Next Afghanistan?
If we look to a potential US-Iran war, it would trigger severe fallout across multiple fronts.
🔸Military: US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites or bases could spark Iranian missile and proxy attacks on US allies (Israel, Gulf states). Escalation risks a regional quagmire, straining US resources.
🔸Economic: Iran could disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, spiking oil prices to $100+/barrel. Sanctions would hit Iran hard but also rattle global markets and allies.
Chinese and Russian trade ruotes can suffer big impacts.
🔸Geopolitical: Russia and China would bring support to Iran due to their interest are also involved. Regional instability could empower militias or ISIS.
Abu Dhabi and Riyadh could feel exposed if a war started.
🔸Humanitarian: Civilian deaths, refugee surges in all middle-east, involving Egipt, and the Gulf states.
Missteps could ignite a costly conflict with no winners. Diplomacy is critical to avoid catastrophe.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
If we look to a potential US-Iran war, it would trigger severe fallout across multiple fronts.
🔸Military: US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites or bases could spark Iranian missile and proxy attacks on US allies (Israel, Gulf states). Escalation risks a regional quagmire, straining US resources.
🔸Economic: Iran could disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, spiking oil prices to $100+/barrel. Sanctions would hit Iran hard but also rattle global markets and allies.
Chinese and Russian trade ruotes can suffer big impacts.
🔸Geopolitical: Russia and China would bring support to Iran due to their interest are also involved. Regional instability could empower militias or ISIS.
Abu Dhabi and Riyadh could feel exposed if a war started.
🔸Humanitarian: Civilian deaths, refugee surges in all middle-east, involving Egipt, and the Gulf states.
Missteps could ignite a costly conflict with no winners. Diplomacy is critical to avoid catastrophe.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
11.04.202511:59
🚨🟨💵 Can Gold Replace the US Dollar?
The US dollar’s days as the global reserve currency are numbered due to blowback from Western sanctions against Russia, Peter Schiff told #NewRulesPodcast.
“We told the world get rid of dollars and buy gold, and that's exactly what they've been doing. That's why the price of gold is at an all-time record high. Gold is on pace for its best year since 1979. That is not a coincidence,” he said.
Trump's have pushed gold prices to record highs at 3%, with gold breaking above $3,160.82 an ounce for the first time due to blowback from the US’ insane sanctions and tariffs obsession.
👉 Watch full interview here.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The US dollar’s days as the global reserve currency are numbered due to blowback from Western sanctions against Russia, Peter Schiff told #NewRulesPodcast.
“We told the world get rid of dollars and buy gold, and that's exactly what they've been doing. That's why the price of gold is at an all-time record high. Gold is on pace for its best year since 1979. That is not a coincidence,” he said.
Trump's have pushed gold prices to record highs at 3%, with gold breaking above $3,160.82 an ounce for the first time due to blowback from the US’ insane sanctions and tariffs obsession.
👉 Watch full interview here.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
10.04.202517:59
🇺🇸💸🇨🇳From Trade War to Financial War: China's Next Move Could Rock the Dollar
George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, gives his perspective on the US “dedollarization” policy alongside the trade war with China:
"The market is rapidly de-dollarizing. It is remarkable that international dollar funding markets and cross-currency basis remains well behaved. In a typical crisis environment the market would be hoarding dollar liquidity to secure funding for its underlying US asset base. This dollar imbalance is what ultimately results in a triggering of the Fed swap lines. Dynamics here seem to be very different: the market has lost faith in US assets, so that instead of closing the asset-liability mismatch by hoarding dollar liquidity it is actively selling down the US assets themselves. We wrote a few weeks ago that US administration policy is encouraging a trend towards de-dollarization to safeguard international investors from a weaponization of dollar liquidity. We are now seeing this play out in real-time at a faster pace than even we would have anticipated. It remains to be seen how orderly this process can remain. A credit event in the global financial system that threatens the provision of short-term dollar liquidity is the point of greatest vulnerability which would turn dollar dynamics more positive.
The US administration is encouraging the sell-off in US Treasuries. The first order effect of current policy is of course the generation of a large negative supply-side shock that raises inflation and makes it harder for the Fed to cut rates. There is of course the bond basis trade that is being unwound. But there is something larger at play as well: a policy objective of reducing bilateral trade imbalances is functionally equivalent to lowering demand for US assets as well. This is not a theoretical consideration: the US has this week initiated trade negotiations with Japan and South Korea, with a specific reference to currency levels being a negotiating objective. It should not be overlooked that Japan is the largest official holder of US treasuries. An implicit negotiating objective of lowering USD valuations entails the possibility of the sale of US treasuries from the Japanese Ministry of finance. We argued two weeks ago that the whole Mar-A-Lago accord framework was flawed because it imposed fundamental inconsistencies in the desired economic objectives of the administration. We are now seeing those inconsistencies exposed in broad daylight.
Beware a trade war shift to a financial war. At the epicenter of the last few days’ escalation is the trade war with China. As our colleagues have highlighted China appears to be maintaining the optionality on weaponizing the currency while signalling a far more supportive domestic economic stance. With a 100%+ tariff on China, there is little room now left for an escalation on the trade front. The next phase risks being an outright financial war involving Chinese ownership of US assets, both on the official and private sector front. It is important to note there can be no winner to such a war: it will damage both the owner (China) and the producer (US) of those assets. The loser will be the global economy."
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, gives his perspective on the US “dedollarization” policy alongside the trade war with China:
"The market is rapidly de-dollarizing. It is remarkable that international dollar funding markets and cross-currency basis remains well behaved. In a typical crisis environment the market would be hoarding dollar liquidity to secure funding for its underlying US asset base. This dollar imbalance is what ultimately results in a triggering of the Fed swap lines. Dynamics here seem to be very different: the market has lost faith in US assets, so that instead of closing the asset-liability mismatch by hoarding dollar liquidity it is actively selling down the US assets themselves. We wrote a few weeks ago that US administration policy is encouraging a trend towards de-dollarization to safeguard international investors from a weaponization of dollar liquidity. We are now seeing this play out in real-time at a faster pace than even we would have anticipated. It remains to be seen how orderly this process can remain. A credit event in the global financial system that threatens the provision of short-term dollar liquidity is the point of greatest vulnerability which would turn dollar dynamics more positive.
The US administration is encouraging the sell-off in US Treasuries. The first order effect of current policy is of course the generation of a large negative supply-side shock that raises inflation and makes it harder for the Fed to cut rates. There is of course the bond basis trade that is being unwound. But there is something larger at play as well: a policy objective of reducing bilateral trade imbalances is functionally equivalent to lowering demand for US assets as well. This is not a theoretical consideration: the US has this week initiated trade negotiations with Japan and South Korea, with a specific reference to currency levels being a negotiating objective. It should not be overlooked that Japan is the largest official holder of US treasuries. An implicit negotiating objective of lowering USD valuations entails the possibility of the sale of US treasuries from the Japanese Ministry of finance. We argued two weeks ago that the whole Mar-A-Lago accord framework was flawed because it imposed fundamental inconsistencies in the desired economic objectives of the administration. We are now seeing those inconsistencies exposed in broad daylight.
Beware a trade war shift to a financial war. At the epicenter of the last few days’ escalation is the trade war with China. As our colleagues have highlighted China appears to be maintaining the optionality on weaponizing the currency while signalling a far more supportive domestic economic stance. With a 100%+ tariff on China, there is little room now left for an escalation on the trade front. The next phase risks being an outright financial war involving Chinese ownership of US assets, both on the official and private sector front. It is important to note there can be no winner to such a war: it will damage both the owner (China) and the producer (US) of those assets. The loser will be the global economy."
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
10.04.202516:12
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷WW3 or Art of the Deal? Breaking Down Trump’s Erratic Iran Strategy
Journalist Sharmaine Narwani joins us to discuss the upcoming US-Iran nuclear talks in Oman on Saturday.
These indirect talks look like U.S. theater to burn the diplomacy card and go straight to war.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Journalist Sharmaine Narwani joins us to discuss the upcoming US-Iran nuclear talks in Oman on Saturday.
These indirect talks look like U.S. theater to burn the diplomacy card and go straight to war.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
10.04.202513:59
🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳Trump's Tariff Trap: Why the US is No Match for China
The Trump administration claims trade wars are easy to win, betting on US escalation dominance over China in the latest tariff fight. But the evidence points the other way. China holds the stronger hand.
Here’s why Beijing has the edge in this high-stakes conflict:
🔸Dependence on Vital Goods: The US relies on China for critical imports, pharmaceutical ingredients, semiconductors, and minerals, that can’t be quickly replaced or produced domestically without massive costs. China loses sales; the US loses essentials.
🔸Trade Deficit Disadvantage: In 2024, the US imported $462.5B from China but exported only $199.2B. Deficit countries like the US suffer more in trade wars, facing shortages of needed goods, while surplus countries like China can redirect sales elsewhere.
🔸Economic Resilience: China’s trade surplus and high savings give it flexibility to absorb losses, while the US, with its deficit and spending habits, faces stagflation risks, shrinking growth and rising inflation.
🔸Self-Inflicted Vulnerability: Trump rises 104% tariffs without securing alternatives first. exposing the US to supply shocks, higher costs, and reduced investment, weakening its leverage.
🔸Strategic Misstep: Escalating before reducing dependence hands China the upper hand, akin to provoking a foe before arming yourself. The US risks a costly quagmire, not a win.
In short, China’s dominance isn’t just about trade numbers, it’s about strategic resilience and US exposure. By rushing into this war unprepared, the administration isn’t flexing strength; it’s inviting damage that could echo for years.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The Trump administration claims trade wars are easy to win, betting on US escalation dominance over China in the latest tariff fight. But the evidence points the other way. China holds the stronger hand.
Here’s why Beijing has the edge in this high-stakes conflict:
🔸Dependence on Vital Goods: The US relies on China for critical imports, pharmaceutical ingredients, semiconductors, and minerals, that can’t be quickly replaced or produced domestically without massive costs. China loses sales; the US loses essentials.
🔸Trade Deficit Disadvantage: In 2024, the US imported $462.5B from China but exported only $199.2B. Deficit countries like the US suffer more in trade wars, facing shortages of needed goods, while surplus countries like China can redirect sales elsewhere.
🔸Economic Resilience: China’s trade surplus and high savings give it flexibility to absorb losses, while the US, with its deficit and spending habits, faces stagflation risks, shrinking growth and rising inflation.
🔸Self-Inflicted Vulnerability: Trump rises 104% tariffs without securing alternatives first. exposing the US to supply shocks, higher costs, and reduced investment, weakening its leverage.
🔸Strategic Misstep: Escalating before reducing dependence hands China the upper hand, akin to provoking a foe before arming yourself. The US risks a costly quagmire, not a win.
In short, China’s dominance isn’t just about trade numbers, it’s about strategic resilience and US exposure. By rushing into this war unprepared, the administration isn’t flexing strength; it’s inviting damage that could echo for years.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
10.04.202512:00
🚨🇺🇲📉"The Shortest Global Trade War in History"
Economist Peter Schiff analyzed the Trump's tariffs dark outlook:
It looks like Trump has already surrendered in what may go down as the shortest global trade war in history. I guess once he saw how badly the U.S. was losing, he needed to find a graceful way to save face.
Talk about spin. This is not how Trump planned it. Scott Bessent is trying to salvage a plan gone horribly bad. Trump has not created any leverage either. If anything, he has exposed to the world how vulnerable the U.S. is to a trade war. So he's undercut his perceived leverage.
Today's U.S. stock market rally is a bear market rally, and likely an opportunity to sell. 10% across the board tariffs remain in effect, and there will be heightened risk over the next 90 days. Plus, the trade war with China is still waging and Treasury prices are still falling.
The U.S. economy has serious structural and fiscal problems that need to be addressed. Our huge trade deficits are a symptom of those problems. Since foreign tariffs have little to do with those deficits, Trump's focus on this issue is counterproductive to solving those problems.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Economist Peter Schiff analyzed the Trump's tariffs dark outlook:
It looks like Trump has already surrendered in what may go down as the shortest global trade war in history. I guess once he saw how badly the U.S. was losing, he needed to find a graceful way to save face.
Talk about spin. This is not how Trump planned it. Scott Bessent is trying to salvage a plan gone horribly bad. Trump has not created any leverage either. If anything, he has exposed to the world how vulnerable the U.S. is to a trade war. So he's undercut his perceived leverage.
Today's U.S. stock market rally is a bear market rally, and likely an opportunity to sell. 10% across the board tariffs remain in effect, and there will be heightened risk over the next 90 days. Plus, the trade war with China is still waging and Treasury prices are still falling.
The U.S. economy has serious structural and fiscal problems that need to be addressed. Our huge trade deficits are a symptom of those problems. Since foreign tariffs have little to do with those deficits, Trump's focus on this issue is counterproductive to solving those problems.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
09.04.202519:13
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Рекордтар
13.04.202523:59
3.7KЖазылушылар28.02.202523:59
1075Дәйексөз индексі21.02.202517:51
10.7K1 жазбаның қамтуы21.02.202517:51
10.7KЖарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы11.02.202521:57
13.70%ER08.02.202508:32
739.27%ERR
16.03.202513:59
🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 FUN FACT: A single Chinese corporation built more commercial ships by tonnage than the US has built since World War II.
And there are still people who think that the US could somehow defeat China in a major war?
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
And there are still people who think that the US could somehow defeat China in a major war?
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
31.03.202515:59
🚨🇮🇷✈️ Trump and Israel are reportedly considering AIRSTRIKES ON IRAN to prevent it from GOING NUCLEAR
If they decide to go through with this attack, it could BACKFIRE HORRIBLY.
Don't forget that Israel is a small country with a handful of key energy facilities. Same goes for other important economic assets such as ports. It wouldn’t take all that much for Iran to cause BLACKOUTS across Israel and CRIPPLE its economy.
What happens if the US attacks Iran?
Let's check some facts:
🔸Iran will retaliate by DESTROYING all US military bases in the region and punish the countries hosting these bases. This will cause oil prices to EXPLODE, sparking a GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS.
🔸"Operation True Promise 2 showed that Israel is DEFENSELESS against Iranian missiles" – former US Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas Freeman.
Even US air defense support won’t be able to help Israel much, he added.
🔸Although the US and Israel can undoubtedly inflict serious damage on Iran, they will STRUGGLE TO DESTROY Iran’s key military assets. Most of them are stored in elaborate UNDERGROUND CITIES
🔸"Israel doesn't have many options for destroying Iran’s underground military and nuclear facilities."
"Sending bombers with heavy bunker-buster bombs 1500 km and back is a HUGE LOGISTICAL CHALLENGE" - former MI6 Alastair Crooke.
🔸US allies in the Middle East STRONGLY OPPOSE strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
“If Iran’s nuclear power plant in Bushehr is attacked, the Persian Gulf’s water supply will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Said Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Mohammed.
Attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities would be a DISASTROUS DECISION OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS.
Even if the US and Israel ultimately prevail, they will almost certainly have to pay an ASTRONOMIC PRICE that will outweigh any benefits from “victory.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
If they decide to go through with this attack, it could BACKFIRE HORRIBLY.
Don't forget that Israel is a small country with a handful of key energy facilities. Same goes for other important economic assets such as ports. It wouldn’t take all that much for Iran to cause BLACKOUTS across Israel and CRIPPLE its economy.
What happens if the US attacks Iran?
Let's check some facts:
🔸Iran will retaliate by DESTROYING all US military bases in the region and punish the countries hosting these bases. This will cause oil prices to EXPLODE, sparking a GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS.
🔸"Operation True Promise 2 showed that Israel is DEFENSELESS against Iranian missiles" – former US Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas Freeman.
Even US air defense support won’t be able to help Israel much, he added.
🔸Although the US and Israel can undoubtedly inflict serious damage on Iran, they will STRUGGLE TO DESTROY Iran’s key military assets. Most of them are stored in elaborate UNDERGROUND CITIES
🔸"Israel doesn't have many options for destroying Iran’s underground military and nuclear facilities."
"Sending bombers with heavy bunker-buster bombs 1500 km and back is a HUGE LOGISTICAL CHALLENGE" - former MI6 Alastair Crooke.
🔸US allies in the Middle East STRONGLY OPPOSE strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
“If Iran’s nuclear power plant in Bushehr is attacked, the Persian Gulf’s water supply will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Said Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Mohammed.
Attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities would be a DISASTROUS DECISION OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS.
Even if the US and Israel ultimately prevail, they will almost certainly have to pay an ASTRONOMIC PRICE that will outweigh any benefits from “victory.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
23.03.202517:50
🚨🇺🇸🏦 BREAKING NEWS: Trump’s economic advisors are RETARDED
The White House has revealed that the US could potentially use its gold reserves to acquire more Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, China’s gold reserves reached record high of 73.6 million fine troy ounces in February. Over the past 2.5 years, China's gold reserves have increased by 11.0 million ounces.
China is laughing at Trump for buying Bitcoin. The US is buying digital fools gold, while China buys the real thing.
Moreover, the Chinese realize that Bitcoin is a scam, which is they sold off $20 billion in Bitcoin back in January.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The White House has revealed that the US could potentially use its gold reserves to acquire more Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, China’s gold reserves reached record high of 73.6 million fine troy ounces in February. Over the past 2.5 years, China's gold reserves have increased by 11.0 million ounces.
China is laughing at Trump for buying Bitcoin. The US is buying digital fools gold, while China buys the real thing.
Moreover, the Chinese realize that Bitcoin is a scam, which is they sold off $20 billion in Bitcoin back in January.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
14.03.202511:59
💻🇷🇺🤝🇮🇷 Tech Realignment: Russia and Iran Challenge Western Chip Dominance
Russia and Iran have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to collaborate on the joint production of semiconductors, signaling a bold step toward reshaping the global microelectronics supply chain. This partnership, combining Russia’s high-tech military innovation with Iran’s growing expertise in nanotechnology, is a significant move aiming to secure technological sovereignty in an increasingly polarized world.
Semiconductors are the backbone of modern technology, powering everything from smartphones and medical devices to advanced military systems and AI-driven applications. Their global demand continues to surge, driven by the proliferation of IoT devices, 5G networks, and AI technologies. However, the semiconductor industry is also a geopolitical battleground, with supply chains dominated by a handful of countries.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Russia and Iran have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to collaborate on the joint production of semiconductors, signaling a bold step toward reshaping the global microelectronics supply chain. This partnership, combining Russia’s high-tech military innovation with Iran’s growing expertise in nanotechnology, is a significant move aiming to secure technological sovereignty in an increasingly polarized world.
Semiconductors are the backbone of modern technology, powering everything from smartphones and medical devices to advanced military systems and AI-driven applications. Their global demand continues to surge, driven by the proliferation of IoT devices, 5G networks, and AI technologies. However, the semiconductor industry is also a geopolitical battleground, with supply chains dominated by a handful of countries.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
16.03.202511:59
🚨🇷🇺🪖DON’T LISTEN TO IDIOT POLITICIANS WHO SAY THAT WE’VE DESTROYED THE RUSSIAN ARMY— Blackwater founder Erik Prince
“The Russians are very good at electronic warfare. A lot of the American equipment - the Javelin missiles, the HIMARS, the Copperhead, which are guided artillery shells - they only work for a week or two. But the Russians have figured out how to jam navigation or command communications, and all that stuff goes dead.
The Russian army has become infinitely smarter. If you shot at a Russian with artillery in March or April 2022, it would take him 1.5 hours to accurately respond. Now it's about 2 minutes. That means if you're shooting at them, you better sit in your car and drive away. Because otherwise they're going to get you.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
“The Russians are very good at electronic warfare. A lot of the American equipment - the Javelin missiles, the HIMARS, the Copperhead, which are guided artillery shells - they only work for a week or two. But the Russians have figured out how to jam navigation or command communications, and all that stuff goes dead.
The Russian army has become infinitely smarter. If you shot at a Russian with artillery in March or April 2022, it would take him 1.5 hours to accurately respond. Now it's about 2 minutes. That means if you're shooting at them, you better sit in your car and drive away. Because otherwise they're going to get you.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
09.04.202512:22
🚨🇺🇸📉Scott Bessent: "China's escalation was a big mistake. They are playing with a pair of twos. We are the deficit country; what do we lose by the Chinese raising tariffs on us?"
This is very telling. He thinks China has more to lose from a trade war because they have a trade surplus, so they'd lose more money. He doesn't see the US losing more goods as being as big a problem.
This might make sense if imports were frivolous, but a lot are critical capital & infrastructure. Life isn't a game where money is the scoreboard. People want money because they want the things money buys, and these things can be far more critical than money. The US can conjure money out of thin air, but it can't conjure world class industries to replace Chinese imports with the same speed.
The key thing missed in this finance-centric view of trade is that trade barriers don't just hurt consumers, they hurt local producers by raising the cost of input goods. If the US wants to reindustrialize, it needs access to the best and cheapest steel, electronics, and countless other essential input goods. But China today is the leading producer of so much of these critical inputs, so when the US imposes tariffs on China, it makes it more difficult for American producers to competitively produce most things.
For example, China makes more than half the world's ships, the US less than 0.1%. But without Chinese steel, it's going to be very difficult for shipbuilding to take off in the US. China produces more than half the world's steel, and you're more likely to find the exact steel you want at the price you can afford in China than elsewhere. So for the foreseeable future, American industries are stuck paying tariffs on Chinese steel and on Chinese ships, and the longer they have to pay tariffs on Chinese steel, the harder it is for them to build competitive ships. This is but one example, but modern supply chains are so international and complex, there are many more.
On the other hand, the US is around ~15 of China's exports, or 2.7% of China's GDP. The US is ~4% of the world's population; the other 96% will buy what the US doesn't buy, even if at a discount. Yes, there will be a cost to China in terms of adjusting, but it's a lot better to have steel, electronics, high speed trains, and ships than America's fiat money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.
It seems insane, but the US regime really is threatening the livelihoods of billions in America and abroad because they are obsessed with the size of individual country trade deficits like it was a scoreboard in a sports game. It is almost certain that all countries will have deficits or surpluses with one another, just like individuals have surpluses and deficits with one another. You don't need to balance your trade with your employees by forcing them to buy your goods. You don't need to balance your trade with your supermarket by forcing it to buy whatever you sell.
America's problem is not any one particular deficit with any nation, it is persistent aggregate deficits with the entire world caused by having a fiat money printer. Simply: an ever increasing number of Americans can live off the money printer as long as the rest of the world is using the dollar. To actually solve this, rather than ruin billions of people's economic plans, the US government should just stop creating fake money and adopt a hard money standard with gold.
When Americans can't print money, they'll work and build industries. As long as they continue print money, they'll continue to import everything and export fake money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
This is very telling. He thinks China has more to lose from a trade war because they have a trade surplus, so they'd lose more money. He doesn't see the US losing more goods as being as big a problem.
This might make sense if imports were frivolous, but a lot are critical capital & infrastructure. Life isn't a game where money is the scoreboard. People want money because they want the things money buys, and these things can be far more critical than money. The US can conjure money out of thin air, but it can't conjure world class industries to replace Chinese imports with the same speed.
The key thing missed in this finance-centric view of trade is that trade barriers don't just hurt consumers, they hurt local producers by raising the cost of input goods. If the US wants to reindustrialize, it needs access to the best and cheapest steel, electronics, and countless other essential input goods. But China today is the leading producer of so much of these critical inputs, so when the US imposes tariffs on China, it makes it more difficult for American producers to competitively produce most things.
For example, China makes more than half the world's ships, the US less than 0.1%. But without Chinese steel, it's going to be very difficult for shipbuilding to take off in the US. China produces more than half the world's steel, and you're more likely to find the exact steel you want at the price you can afford in China than elsewhere. So for the foreseeable future, American industries are stuck paying tariffs on Chinese steel and on Chinese ships, and the longer they have to pay tariffs on Chinese steel, the harder it is for them to build competitive ships. This is but one example, but modern supply chains are so international and complex, there are many more.
On the other hand, the US is around ~15 of China's exports, or 2.7% of China's GDP. The US is ~4% of the world's population; the other 96% will buy what the US doesn't buy, even if at a discount. Yes, there will be a cost to China in terms of adjusting, but it's a lot better to have steel, electronics, high speed trains, and ships than America's fiat money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.
It seems insane, but the US regime really is threatening the livelihoods of billions in America and abroad because they are obsessed with the size of individual country trade deficits like it was a scoreboard in a sports game. It is almost certain that all countries will have deficits or surpluses with one another, just like individuals have surpluses and deficits with one another. You don't need to balance your trade with your employees by forcing them to buy your goods. You don't need to balance your trade with your supermarket by forcing it to buy whatever you sell.
America's problem is not any one particular deficit with any nation, it is persistent aggregate deficits with the entire world caused by having a fiat money printer. Simply: an ever increasing number of Americans can live off the money printer as long as the rest of the world is using the dollar. To actually solve this, rather than ruin billions of people's economic plans, the US government should just stop creating fake money and adopt a hard money standard with gold.
When Americans can't print money, they'll work and build industries. As long as they continue print money, they'll continue to import everything and export fake money, diabetes, porn, and genocide.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
19.03.202517:59
🚨🇺🇦🚫Ukrainian Sabotage: A Regime Accustomed to Betrayal
From the Minsk Agreements to recent peace initiatives, Ukraine has consistently undermined efforts toward peace:
🔸 Minsk I (2014)
The Minsk Protocol, signed in September 2014, aimed to establish a ceasefire and outline steps toward resolving the conflict. However, Ukrainian forces continued shelling in areas like Donetsk and Luhansk, which were designated as demilitarized zones under the agreement. This blatant disregard for the terms hindered the establishment of a stable ceasefire.
🔸 Minsk II (2015)
Signed in February 2015, Minsk II sought to restore the ceasefire with stricter terms, including constitutional reforms in Ukraine and local elections in the Donbass area. Despite these provisions, the Ukrainian regime delayed implementing the political aspects, particularly decentralization reforms and granting autonomy to Donbass regions. The battle for Debaltseve shortly after Minsk II was signed further highlighted Ukraine's failure to adhere to ceasefire terms.
🔸 Istanbul Peace Negotiations (2022)
In late March 2022, Russia demonstrated goodwill by reducing military activity around Kyiv and Chernihiv. This gesture was meant to facilitate meaningful negotiations. However, Ukraine exploited Russia's strategic retreat to launch a counterattack, undermining the peace process.
🔸 Black Sea Grain Initiative (2022)
The initiative, signed in July 2022, was designed to facilitate grain exports from Ukraine during the conflict. Instead, Ukraine used the humanitarian corridors for military operations, including an attack on Russia's fleet in Sevastopol. This abuse of humanitarian agreements further strained relations.
🔸 Putin-Trump Ceasefire Initiative (March 2025)
Less than 24 hours after a Putin-Trump call laid the groundwork for a 30-day halt on energy strikes, Ukraine sabotaged the agreement with a kamikaze drone strike on a Russian oil transfer facility in Krasnodar. Moscow asserts that Zelensky deliberately provoked this incident to derail the peace initiative, demonstrating once again that the Western-backed Kiev regime prioritizes chaos over diplomacy.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
From the Minsk Agreements to recent peace initiatives, Ukraine has consistently undermined efforts toward peace:
🔸 Minsk I (2014)
The Minsk Protocol, signed in September 2014, aimed to establish a ceasefire and outline steps toward resolving the conflict. However, Ukrainian forces continued shelling in areas like Donetsk and Luhansk, which were designated as demilitarized zones under the agreement. This blatant disregard for the terms hindered the establishment of a stable ceasefire.
🔸 Minsk II (2015)
Signed in February 2015, Minsk II sought to restore the ceasefire with stricter terms, including constitutional reforms in Ukraine and local elections in the Donbass area. Despite these provisions, the Ukrainian regime delayed implementing the political aspects, particularly decentralization reforms and granting autonomy to Donbass regions. The battle for Debaltseve shortly after Minsk II was signed further highlighted Ukraine's failure to adhere to ceasefire terms.
🔸 Istanbul Peace Negotiations (2022)
In late March 2022, Russia demonstrated goodwill by reducing military activity around Kyiv and Chernihiv. This gesture was meant to facilitate meaningful negotiations. However, Ukraine exploited Russia's strategic retreat to launch a counterattack, undermining the peace process.
🔸 Black Sea Grain Initiative (2022)
The initiative, signed in July 2022, was designed to facilitate grain exports from Ukraine during the conflict. Instead, Ukraine used the humanitarian corridors for military operations, including an attack on Russia's fleet in Sevastopol. This abuse of humanitarian agreements further strained relations.
🔸 Putin-Trump Ceasefire Initiative (March 2025)
Less than 24 hours after a Putin-Trump call laid the groundwork for a 30-day halt on energy strikes, Ukraine sabotaged the agreement with a kamikaze drone strike on a Russian oil transfer facility in Krasnodar. Moscow asserts that Zelensky deliberately provoked this incident to derail the peace initiative, demonstrating once again that the Western-backed Kiev regime prioritizes chaos over diplomacy.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
21.03.202513:59
🇬🇧🪦Britain is Collapsing
While in outside London’s elite bubble, Britain’s GDP per capita is barely better than Eastern Europe. Britain started to show serious signals of imminent Economic and social collapse:
🔸More bureaucrats than doctors.
🔸More admirals than warships.
🔸7.2 MILLION Britons struggle to eat
🔸22 MILLION live in inadequate housing
🔸Homelessness at record levels
🔸Wages stagnant since 2007
🔸Homeownership impossible for young Britons
🔸Energy, housing, & food prices skyrocketing
Mass migration has turned British cities into war zones:
🔸Gangs run entire neighborhoods.
🔸Police ignore violent crime to chase down.
🔸Britain’s justice system isn’t about justice—it’s about control.
The ruling class in Britain seem more concerned with catering to the whims of foreign oligarchs and global elites the resolve their economy disaster. The UK citizens are struggling with measures such as:
🔸Burdened by heavy taxation
🔸Struggling with a rising cost of living
🔸Watching as their cultural heritage is eroded
Meanwhile, wealthy foreigners and international corporations enjoy preferential treatment, tax breaks, and an open-door policy that allows them to reshape British society to their liking.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
While in outside London’s elite bubble, Britain’s GDP per capita is barely better than Eastern Europe. Britain started to show serious signals of imminent Economic and social collapse:
🔸More bureaucrats than doctors.
🔸More admirals than warships.
🔸7.2 MILLION Britons struggle to eat
🔸22 MILLION live in inadequate housing
🔸Homelessness at record levels
🔸Wages stagnant since 2007
🔸Homeownership impossible for young Britons
🔸Energy, housing, & food prices skyrocketing
Mass migration has turned British cities into war zones:
🔸Gangs run entire neighborhoods.
🔸Police ignore violent crime to chase down.
🔸Britain’s justice system isn’t about justice—it’s about control.
The ruling class in Britain seem more concerned with catering to the whims of foreign oligarchs and global elites the resolve their economy disaster. The UK citizens are struggling with measures such as:
🔸Burdened by heavy taxation
🔸Struggling with a rising cost of living
🔸Watching as their cultural heritage is eroded
Meanwhile, wealthy foreigners and international corporations enjoy preferential treatment, tax breaks, and an open-door policy that allows them to reshape British society to their liking.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
18.03.202515:59
🚨🇮🇷🚀 Meet Iran's Iron Dome
Despite decades of sanctions, Iran is ready to protect its land with a sophisticated indigenous air defense network.
🔸358 MISSILE: A new versatile weapon that can serve as a Surface-to-air missile(SAM), loitering munition, cruise missile, or man-portable air-defense system
🔸The Raad-2: Neutralize aircrafts, drones, and missiles from a range of 50 to 80 km.
🔸Tabas & 3 Khordad Air Defense Systems: Detects flying, cruise, and stealth targets up to 350 km radius and altitudes up to 30 km.
🔸Dezful Air Defense System: Detects cruise missiles and drones from a range of 27 km.
🔸Seraj (light) Laser Air Defense System: Overheats the target, causing it to break down, by by emitting a high-energy photon beam.
🔸The Bavar-373: Its a long-range air defense system from 300Km. range. It's capable of taking out F-22s, F-35s, cruise missiles and choppers.
🔸Mersad-16: Can target drones and aircraft within a 60km radius.
🔸Sayyad: Can destroy three targets at the same time, effective against aircraft with 70km range.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Despite decades of sanctions, Iran is ready to protect its land with a sophisticated indigenous air defense network.
🔸358 MISSILE: A new versatile weapon that can serve as a Surface-to-air missile(SAM), loitering munition, cruise missile, or man-portable air-defense system
🔸The Raad-2: Neutralize aircrafts, drones, and missiles from a range of 50 to 80 km.
🔸Tabas & 3 Khordad Air Defense Systems: Detects flying, cruise, and stealth targets up to 350 km radius and altitudes up to 30 km.
🔸Dezful Air Defense System: Detects cruise missiles and drones from a range of 27 km.
🔸Seraj (light) Laser Air Defense System: Overheats the target, causing it to break down, by by emitting a high-energy photon beam.
🔸The Bavar-373: Its a long-range air defense system from 300Km. range. It's capable of taking out F-22s, F-35s, cruise missiles and choppers.
🔸Mersad-16: Can target drones and aircraft within a 60km radius.
🔸Sayyad: Can destroy three targets at the same time, effective against aircraft with 70km range.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
30.03.202515:59
🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸China is CRUSHING the US in global automation race
In 2023 China accounted for 32% of global manufacturing value added, while the US was 19%.
But China installed over 50% of new industrial robots, while the US was 10%.
So ROBOT INTENSITY of Chinese manufacturing is going up much faster than in the US.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
In 2023 China accounted for 32% of global manufacturing value added, while the US was 19%.
But China installed over 50% of new industrial robots, while the US was 10%.
So ROBOT INTENSITY of Chinese manufacturing is going up much faster than in the US.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
31.03.202517:59
🚨🇺🇸 Bulldozing Peace Through Tariff Wars: See Who Trump 2.0 Is Targeting
In just three months since returning to office, President Donald Trump has adopted an aggressive foreign policy stance, issuing threats of sanctions, tariffs, and even military action against the vast majority of the world's population:
🇨🇦Canada: Targeted with potential tariffs, including a 25% levy on vehicles and auto components.
Trump has long desired to turn Canada into his 51st state, which explains his aggressive rhetoric, including vague threats of military action during his campaign—though these were never intended as serious policy proposals.
🇨🇳China: Trump imposed tariffs across various sectors, and on numerous products, with rates skyrocketing to 20%.
🇲🇽Mexico: Announced 25% tariffs, though these were postponed.
Threats of military intervention have been made, though not as a serious policy proposal.
🇷🇺Russia: Threatened with sanctions and tariffs, particularly on oil exports if a ceasefire in Ukraine is not achieved.
Recently, he expressed frustration with Putin while remaining engaged in negotiations.
🇮🇷Iran: Threats of bombings and secondary tariffs loom if a nuclear deal is not established. Previous sanctions were reinstated during Trump's first term.
🇮🇳India: Labeled the "tariff king" and faced threats of reciprocal tariffs.
Ongoing negotiations aim to reduce tariffs and enhance trade relations.
🇪🇺European Union: Trump has issued threats of tariffs, though specific details have not been disclosed
🌐BRICS Nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa): Threatened with tariffs if they pursue the creation of a new currency.
🇬🇱Greenland: Trump has made threats of military intervention, asserting that the US "will go as far as we have to go" to gain control of Greenland.
🇵🇦Panama: Similar threats of military intervention have been made, though these were not presented as serious policy proposals.
🇻🇪Venezuela: Trump also vowed secondary tariffs on countries buying oil from Venezuela.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
In just three months since returning to office, President Donald Trump has adopted an aggressive foreign policy stance, issuing threats of sanctions, tariffs, and even military action against the vast majority of the world's population:
🇨🇦Canada: Targeted with potential tariffs, including a 25% levy on vehicles and auto components.
Trump has long desired to turn Canada into his 51st state, which explains his aggressive rhetoric, including vague threats of military action during his campaign—though these were never intended as serious policy proposals.
🇨🇳China: Trump imposed tariffs across various sectors, and on numerous products, with rates skyrocketing to 20%.
🇲🇽Mexico: Announced 25% tariffs, though these were postponed.
Threats of military intervention have been made, though not as a serious policy proposal.
🇷🇺Russia: Threatened with sanctions and tariffs, particularly on oil exports if a ceasefire in Ukraine is not achieved.
Recently, he expressed frustration with Putin while remaining engaged in negotiations.
🇮🇷Iran: Threats of bombings and secondary tariffs loom if a nuclear deal is not established. Previous sanctions were reinstated during Trump's first term.
🇮🇳India: Labeled the "tariff king" and faced threats of reciprocal tariffs.
Ongoing negotiations aim to reduce tariffs and enhance trade relations.
🇪🇺European Union: Trump has issued threats of tariffs, though specific details have not been disclosed
🌐BRICS Nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa): Threatened with tariffs if they pursue the creation of a new currency.
🇬🇱Greenland: Trump has made threats of military intervention, asserting that the US "will go as far as we have to go" to gain control of Greenland.
🇵🇦Panama: Similar threats of military intervention have been made, though these were not presented as serious policy proposals.
🇻🇪Venezuela: Trump also vowed secondary tariffs on countries buying oil from Venezuela.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
19.03.202511:59
🚨🇺🇸JFK Files Reveal CIA's Rogue State: Schlesinger's Warning to Kennedy
The newly declassified JFK files uncover a chilling memo from Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Kennedy’s advisor, exposing the CIA as a “state within a state.” Schlesinger’s arguments for dismantling the agency reveal its unchecked power and disastrous covert operations.
🔸Independent Military Power: The CIA operated its own military and air force, often outnumbering US diplomats in key embassies.
🔸Rogue Foreign Policy: Covert operations in Iran, Cuba, and Guatemala shaped US foreign policy without presidential approval, undermining credibility.
🔸Bay of Pigs Disaster: The failed invasion of Cuba damaged the US’s global reputation and highlighted the CIA’s operational flaws.
🔸Encroachment on Allies: The CIA monopolized diplomatic contact with foreign leaders, including French political figures, bypassing State Department protocols.
The agency operated beyond oversight and accountability. Schlesinger’s memo the dangers of the deep state and a stark reminder of the perils of unchecked US intelligence power.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The newly declassified JFK files uncover a chilling memo from Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Kennedy’s advisor, exposing the CIA as a “state within a state.” Schlesinger’s arguments for dismantling the agency reveal its unchecked power and disastrous covert operations.
🔸Independent Military Power: The CIA operated its own military and air force, often outnumbering US diplomats in key embassies.
🔸Rogue Foreign Policy: Covert operations in Iran, Cuba, and Guatemala shaped US foreign policy without presidential approval, undermining credibility.
🔸Bay of Pigs Disaster: The failed invasion of Cuba damaged the US’s global reputation and highlighted the CIA’s operational flaws.
🔸Encroachment on Allies: The CIA monopolized diplomatic contact with foreign leaders, including French political figures, bypassing State Department protocols.
The agency operated beyond oversight and accountability. Schlesinger’s memo the dangers of the deep state and a stark reminder of the perils of unchecked US intelligence power.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
04.04.202512:05
🚨🌍💪🏿Today, Africa is LAUGHING at the rest of the world
African countries were smart enough reduce trade ties with a highly unpredictable superpower, and strengthen trade ties with a much more reliable superpower.
Other regions should learn from Africa.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
African countries were smart enough reduce trade ties with a highly unpredictable superpower, and strengthen trade ties with a much more reliable superpower.
Other regions should learn from Africa.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.