Words you have to know for your writing

On the one hand, opponents of zoos claim that wild animals deserve to live in their natural habitats, not in confined spaces. They argue that zoos can cause stress and unnatural behavior in animals, as they are often kept in enclosures that are much smaller than their natural range. Moreover, some zoos prioritize entertainment over animal welfare, which raises ethical concerns. For example, animals may be trained to perform tricks or kept in unsuitable climates, leading to poor health and mental distress.

On the other hand, supporters of zoos believe they play a crucial role in conservation and education. Many endangered species are protected and even bred in captivity, helping to prevent extinction. Zoos also offer people, especially children, the opportunity to learn about wildlife and develop an appreciation for nature. In well-managed zoos, animals are cared for by professionals who understand their needs, and efforts are made to replicate their natural environment as closely as possible.

In my opinion, while some zoos do more harm than good, well-regulated zoos can be beneficial. If they focus on conservation, education, and animal welfare rather than profit, they can serve an important purpose. Strict guidelines and regular inspections should be enforced to ensure animals are treated with respect and kept in appropriate conditions.

In conclusion, although keeping wild animals in captivity can raise serious ethical issues, zoos can also contribute to the protection and understanding of wildlife. The key is to ensure that zoos are properly managed and genuinely focused on the animals' well-being.