Indian Libertarian Socialist Federation
Anarchists from the Indian subcontinent are welcome to join this group: @AnarchyIndia
Also check out:
@AntiworkQuotes
@BegumpuraAntifa
@postLeftPosting
@RelationshipAnarchyIndia
@Revolutionary_Youth_Front
@copTankie
more links: https://linktr.ee/ilsf
Also check out:
@AntiworkQuotes
@BegumpuraAntifa
@postLeftPosting
@RelationshipAnarchyIndia
@Revolutionary_Youth_Front
@copTankie
more links: https://linktr.ee/ilsf
关联群组
anarchy chat
73
"Indian Libertarian Socialist Federation" 群组最新帖子
14.05.202501:31
it shouldn't be controversial
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNew3Dh5x
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNew3Dh5x
13.05.202513:16
13.05.202501:25
'Like many debunked ideas, hygiene theory and the myth of the bored immune system have become entrenched. A couple of years ago, hygiene theory got repackaged as "immunity debt." Now Americans, Canadians, and many Europeans think they need to get sick to stay healthy. The elites have absolutely no problem with that. It saves them countless billions to let everyone continue thinking they're better off letting diseases run around in their cells.
So:
Your immune system doesn't work like a muscle. It doesn't get stronger the more it's exposed to different harmful germs.
It doesn't need practice.
...
Think of it like this:
Your body already knows how to heal its skin and bones. You don't have to teach it how to do that by cutting yourself or breaking your arm.
As it happens, many westerners also think bones grow back stronger after they're broken and scar tissue is tougher than normal skin.
That's also false.
Scar tissue remains functionally deficient in many ways compared to uninjured skin. Broken bones form a temporary calcium callus that's stronger than ordinary bone, but it's eventually replaced.
These misguided ideas fit in a culture obsessed with tough love, the idea that abusing someone somehow builds their character. And while it might make you interesting, it's certainly not "good" for you.'
— Jessica Wildfire
https://covidsafehotties.boards.net/thread/2778/immune-system-works
So:
Your immune system doesn't work like a muscle. It doesn't get stronger the more it's exposed to different harmful germs.
It doesn't need practice.
...
Think of it like this:
Your body already knows how to heal its skin and bones. You don't have to teach it how to do that by cutting yourself or breaking your arm.
As it happens, many westerners also think bones grow back stronger after they're broken and scar tissue is tougher than normal skin.
That's also false.
Scar tissue remains functionally deficient in many ways compared to uninjured skin. Broken bones form a temporary calcium callus that's stronger than ordinary bone, but it's eventually replaced.
These misguided ideas fit in a culture obsessed with tough love, the idea that abusing someone somehow builds their character. And while it might make you interesting, it's certainly not "good" for you.'
— Jessica Wildfire
https://covidsafehotties.boards.net/thread/2778/immune-system-works
12.05.202512:45
’The anger among the Hindu right-wing stemmed from their expectations that the “strong” Narendra Modi government was best placed to deliver a “final solution” to the Pakistan problem.’
https://scroll.in/article/1082235/why-the-india-pakistan-ceasefire-is-giving-modi-supporters-heartburn
https://scroll.in/article/1082235/why-the-india-pakistan-ceasefire-is-giving-modi-supporters-heartburn
12.05.202501:55
"The likelihood that your acts of resistance cannot stop the injustice does not exempt you from acting in what you sincerely and reflectively hold to be the best interests of your community.”
— Susan Sontag
— Susan Sontag
11.05.202513:36
"You are not a tech bro, you are a modern day factory worker."
Oakland, California
Oakland, California
11.05.202502:32
10.05.202514:26
10.05.202502:03
'Women invented all the core technologies that made civilization possible. This isn’t some feminist myth; it’s what modern anthropologists believe. Women are thought to have invented pottery, basketmaking, weaving, textiles, horticulture, and agriculture. That’s right: without women’s inventions, we wouldn’t be able to carry things or store things or tie things up or go fishing or hunt with nets or haft a blade or wear clothes or grow our food or live in permanent settlements. Suck on that.
Women have continued to be involved in the creation and advancement of civilization throughout history, whether you know it or not. Pick anything—a technology, a science, an art form, a school of thought—and start digging into the background. You’ll find women there, I guarantee, making critical contributions and often inventing the damn shit in the first place. Women have made those contributions in spite of astonishing hurdles. Hurdles like not being allowed to go to school. Hurdles like not being allowed to work in an office with men, or join a professional society, or walk on the street, or own property.
Example: look up Lise Meitner some time. When she was born in 1878 it was illegal in Austria for girls to attend school past the age of 13. Once the laws finally eased up and she could go to university, she wasn’t allowed to study with the men. Then she got a research post but wasn’t allowed to use the lab on account of girl cooties. Her whole life was like this, but she still managed to discover nuclear fucking fission. Then the Nobel committee gave the prize to her junior male colleague and ignored her existence completely.
Men in all patriarchal civilizations, including ours, have worked to downplay or deny women’s creative contributions. That’s because patriarchy is founded on the belief that women are breeding stock and men are the only people who can think. The easiest way for men to erase women’s contributions is to simply ignore that they happened. Because when you ignore something, it gets forgotten. People in the next generation don’t hear about it, and so they grow up thinking that no women have ever done anything. And then when women in their generation do stuff, they think ‘it’s a fluke, never happened before in the history of the world, ignore it.’ And so they ignore it, and it gets forgotten. And on and on and on. The New York Times article is a perfect illustration of this principle in action.
Finally, and this is important: even those women who weren’t inventors and intellectuals, even those women who really did spend all their lives doing stereotypical “women’s work”—they also built this world. The mundane labor of life is what makes everything else possible. Before you can have scientists and engineers and artists, you have to have a whole bunch of people (and it’s usually women) to hold down the basics: to grow and harvest and cook the food, to provide clothes and shelter, to fetch the firewood and the water, to nurture and nurse, to tend and teach. Every single scrap of civilized inventing and dreaming and thinking rides on top of that foundation.
Never forget that.'
— Violet Socks, Patriarchy in action: the New York Times rewrites history
Women have continued to be involved in the creation and advancement of civilization throughout history, whether you know it or not. Pick anything—a technology, a science, an art form, a school of thought—and start digging into the background. You’ll find women there, I guarantee, making critical contributions and often inventing the damn shit in the first place. Women have made those contributions in spite of astonishing hurdles. Hurdles like not being allowed to go to school. Hurdles like not being allowed to work in an office with men, or join a professional society, or walk on the street, or own property.
Example: look up Lise Meitner some time. When she was born in 1878 it was illegal in Austria for girls to attend school past the age of 13. Once the laws finally eased up and she could go to university, she wasn’t allowed to study with the men. Then she got a research post but wasn’t allowed to use the lab on account of girl cooties. Her whole life was like this, but she still managed to discover nuclear fucking fission. Then the Nobel committee gave the prize to her junior male colleague and ignored her existence completely.
Men in all patriarchal civilizations, including ours, have worked to downplay or deny women’s creative contributions. That’s because patriarchy is founded on the belief that women are breeding stock and men are the only people who can think. The easiest way for men to erase women’s contributions is to simply ignore that they happened. Because when you ignore something, it gets forgotten. People in the next generation don’t hear about it, and so they grow up thinking that no women have ever done anything. And then when women in their generation do stuff, they think ‘it’s a fluke, never happened before in the history of the world, ignore it.’ And so they ignore it, and it gets forgotten. And on and on and on. The New York Times article is a perfect illustration of this principle in action.
Finally, and this is important: even those women who weren’t inventors and intellectuals, even those women who really did spend all their lives doing stereotypical “women’s work”—they also built this world. The mundane labor of life is what makes everything else possible. Before you can have scientists and engineers and artists, you have to have a whole bunch of people (and it’s usually women) to hold down the basics: to grow and harvest and cook the food, to provide clothes and shelter, to fetch the firewood and the water, to nurture and nurse, to tend and teach. Every single scrap of civilized inventing and dreaming and thinking rides on top of that foundation.
Never forget that.'
— Violet Socks, Patriarchy in action: the New York Times rewrites history
09.05.202513:11
"If you deny any affinity with another person or kind of person, if you declare it to be wholly different from yourself—as men have done to women, and class has done to class, and nation has done to nation—you may hate it, or deify it, but in either case you have denied its spiritual equality, and its human reality.
You have made it into a thing, to which the only possible relationship is a power relationship. And thus you have fatally impoverished your own reality."
— Ursula K Le Guin
You have made it into a thing, to which the only possible relationship is a power relationship. And thus you have fatally impoverished your own reality."
— Ursula K Le Guin
09.05.202503:25
08.05.202516:26
“He allowed himself to be swayed by his conviction that human beings are not born once and for all on the day their mothers give birth to them, but that life obliges them over and over again to give birth to themselves.”
— Gabriel García Márquez, Love in the Time of Cholera (1985)
— Gabriel García Márquez, Love in the Time of Cholera (1985)
08.05.202509:56
"To say State is to say war. There is no such thing as States at war and States at peace. States that want war and States that want peace do not exist. All States, by the simple fact of their existence, are instruments of war."
— Alfredo M Bonanno, Towards Anarchist Antimilitarism
— Alfredo M Bonanno, Towards Anarchist Antimilitarism
08.05.202502:25
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
— Upton Sinclair
记录
12.05.202523:59
1.7K订阅者21.05.202423:59
0引用指数01.01.202523:59
789每帖平均覆盖率25.04.202521:43
266广告帖子的平均覆盖率20.04.202523:59
75.00%ER01.01.202523:59
47.70%ERR
19.04.202502:05
13.05.202513:16
23.04.202514:41
10.05.202514:26
11.05.202502:32
24.04.202505:45
08.05.202502:25
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
— Upton Sinclair
08.05.202509:56
"To say State is to say war. There is no such thing as States at war and States at peace. States that want war and States that want peace do not exist. All States, by the simple fact of their existence, are instruments of war."
— Alfredo M Bonanno, Towards Anarchist Antimilitarism
— Alfredo M Bonanno, Towards Anarchist Antimilitarism
07.05.202518:55
"War is the easiest way to shift vast, unaccountable new powers to the State. People are most uncritically obedient at the very time they need to be most vigilant."
— Kevin Carson
— Kevin Carson
登录以解锁更多功能。
