The difference between Elite Human Capital and Aristocracy:
I will define Elite human capital the way those who coined the term do: extremely talented individuals.
The aristocratic spirit is not defined by one’s talent but rather by one’s soul and virtues. It’s a personality of honor, nobility and transcendence.
An aristocrat is when elite human capital has the aristocratic spirit. The aristocratic spirit can exist in a peasant: There are countless examples of men who are not particularly talented or smart, yet whom conduct themselves with the honor and morality of a knight. When a peasant can have more honor and nobility than a king through his actions there is a mobility of spirit anyone can transcend. Within a hierarchical elitist society one can still have value and humanity through their spirit no-matter where they sit in the hierarchy.
Jewish deconstruction and social liberalism has waged a war against aristocracy, which has created a society far more oppressive and with far fewer routes of upward mobility. In an aristocratic society a peasant can have dignity and honor by behaving in a noble manner. In liberalism all this peasant has is his money and because he doesn’t have much of that he is just a loser.
If we do Death of the Author on American psycho we can see this playing out: the Elite Human Capital at a Wallstreet investment bank, are spiritually dead, morally depraved and concerned only with money and status. They are elites but they are empty and have poverty of the soul. They have climbed to the top only to be the first amongst miserable freaks.
The Jews are a soulless people and as a result cannot be aristocrats. Jews view aristocracy as a threat as seen in Karl Popper’s: Open Society and its future. The Jews call all aristocracy “fascism” which they have decided means it’s automatically wrong. Jews attempt to erase high culture while capitalism itself selects for commodification and cheapness with a low culture being more profitable.
