옥수수 🌽
19.04.202515:05
Happy Easter
19.04.202503:22
You frequently observe how the “race realist” dissident right and pro-Chinese propaganda (Wumao) accounts incessantly recycle this image to prove how liberalism is inferior to authoritarianism.
All governments are essentially authoritarian because they have monopoly on “legitimate” violence. It really is futile to make a specific distinction for “authoritarianism.” Even if governments exist to protect the natural rights of people based on their consent, which is a Lockeian liberal definition of what governments essentially are, the existence of consent or general will doesn’t negate the “authoritarian” nature of governments or states. As Hobbes would argue, people would rather be ruled under authority to prevent incessant chaos from crippling their chances of survival or material wealth.
Also, smoking in front of your farm products is 3rd world peasant behavior. In despite of the message the picture above intended to convey, liberalism clearly just mogs authoritarianism in this image.
All governments are essentially authoritarian because they have monopoly on “legitimate” violence. It really is futile to make a specific distinction for “authoritarianism.” Even if governments exist to protect the natural rights of people based on their consent, which is a Lockeian liberal definition of what governments essentially are, the existence of consent or general will doesn’t negate the “authoritarian” nature of governments or states. As Hobbes would argue, people would rather be ruled under authority to prevent incessant chaos from crippling their chances of survival or material wealth.
Also, smoking in front of your farm products is 3rd world peasant behavior. In despite of the message the picture above intended to convey, liberalism clearly just mogs authoritarianism in this image.
17.04.202519:20
𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚊’𝚜 𝙵𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚐𝚗 𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 (𝚂𝚅𝚁) 𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚄𝚂-𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝 𝙴𝚄
Reposted from:
옥수수 🌽
17.04.202502:44
𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐊 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐀 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐄𝐑
The Tonghak movement, established in 1860 by Choe Che U, blended Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, folk beliefs, and elements of Catholicism. It promoted equality and addressed societal anxieties amid Western encroachment. Although Tonghak didn’t outright oppose the Chosun dynasty, its challenge to the established social order alarmed the government, leading to Choe’s arrest and execution in 1864. Despite suppression, the movement endured, spreading across southern Korea in the 1880s and gaining strength. By the 1890s, its followers began advocating for Choe’s rehabilitation, while growing rural unrest over local corruption and misrule set the stage for a peasant uprising.
In March 1894, about 4,000 armed peasants in Jeolla Province gathered to release a "Manifesto," marking the beginning of the Tonghak Peasant Uprising. The document outlined their grievances and goals, drawing heavily on Confucian values. However, its focus on traditional ideals rather than modern or anti-foreign perspectives has led many scholars to overlook it, often highlighting the uprising’s links to modernization or nationalism instead. Yet, the "Manifesto" is central to understanding the motivations of the peasants and their worldview.
The "Manifesto" begins with a Confucian principle: humanity’s unique moral capacity makes people the most valuable beings in the world. This familiar phrasing was likely intended to resonate with both educated elites and ordinary people. It emphasized loyalty to the king and duty to family, portraying the peasants as loyal subjects seeking to save the nation. The king himself was not criticized but described as a potentially virtuous ruler, hindered by corrupt officials whose greed and abuse had plunged the country into crisis.
The peasants saw themselves as humble yet determined actors stepping in to restore order and justice where the ruling class had failed. They framed their struggle as an effort to revive injŏng (仁政, sincerity, human-heartedness) benevolent governance, and to protect the people, whom they described as the foundation of the nation. While recognizing their modest position in society, they asserted their moral duty to lead the way in restoring peace and harmony. The "Manifesto" concluded with a hopeful vision of a new era of prosperity under the king’s virtuous leadership.
Ultimately, the "Manifesto" reflects the peasant army’s deeply rooted Confucian ideals, blending loyalty to tradition with a bold assertion of responsibility for their country’s future. Through their actions and words, the Tonghak peasants sought to bridge the gap between a crumbling social order and their vision of a just and harmonious society.
The Tonghak movement, established in 1860 by Choe Che U, blended Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, folk beliefs, and elements of Catholicism. It promoted equality and addressed societal anxieties amid Western encroachment. Although Tonghak didn’t outright oppose the Chosun dynasty, its challenge to the established social order alarmed the government, leading to Choe’s arrest and execution in 1864. Despite suppression, the movement endured, spreading across southern Korea in the 1880s and gaining strength. By the 1890s, its followers began advocating for Choe’s rehabilitation, while growing rural unrest over local corruption and misrule set the stage for a peasant uprising.
In March 1894, about 4,000 armed peasants in Jeolla Province gathered to release a "Manifesto," marking the beginning of the Tonghak Peasant Uprising. The document outlined their grievances and goals, drawing heavily on Confucian values. However, its focus on traditional ideals rather than modern or anti-foreign perspectives has led many scholars to overlook it, often highlighting the uprising’s links to modernization or nationalism instead. Yet, the "Manifesto" is central to understanding the motivations of the peasants and their worldview.
The "Manifesto" begins with a Confucian principle: humanity’s unique moral capacity makes people the most valuable beings in the world. This familiar phrasing was likely intended to resonate with both educated elites and ordinary people. It emphasized loyalty to the king and duty to family, portraying the peasants as loyal subjects seeking to save the nation. The king himself was not criticized but described as a potentially virtuous ruler, hindered by corrupt officials whose greed and abuse had plunged the country into crisis.
The peasants saw themselves as humble yet determined actors stepping in to restore order and justice where the ruling class had failed. They framed their struggle as an effort to revive injŏng (仁政, sincerity, human-heartedness) benevolent governance, and to protect the people, whom they described as the foundation of the nation. While recognizing their modest position in society, they asserted their moral duty to lead the way in restoring peace and harmony. The "Manifesto" concluded with a hopeful vision of a new era of prosperity under the king’s virtuous leadership.
Ultimately, the "Manifesto" reflects the peasant army’s deeply rooted Confucian ideals, blending loyalty to tradition with a bold assertion of responsibility for their country’s future. Through their actions and words, the Tonghak peasants sought to bridge the gap between a crumbling social order and their vision of a just and harmonious society.
16.04.202502:45
Korean btw
14.04.202515:50
“𝘕𝘝𝘐𝘋𝘐𝘈 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦 𝘕𝘝𝘐𝘋𝘐𝘈 𝘈𝘐 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜.𝘚.
𝘛𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘕𝘝𝘐𝘋𝘐𝘈 𝘉𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘐 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘴.”
https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-manufacture-american-made-ai-supercomputers-us/
𝘛𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘕𝘝𝘐𝘋𝘐𝘈 𝘉𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘐 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘴.”
https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-manufacture-american-made-ai-supercomputers-us/
19.04.202511:30
18.04.202516:10
Kissinger is a figure that BAPtard wignats should admire if anything else. Kissinger understood that Nations aren’t saints, but predators in a jungle. His foreign policy craftsmanship was essentially about “Darwinian” survival, not ethics. Prioritizing amicable outcomes over moralfagging deontological duties is far more ideologically compatible with a pragmatic Darwinian view of competition, but essentially these retards are just no different from those “swarthy 3rd world browns” when it comes to glorifying losers.
17.04.202516:06
🤲
Reposted from:옥수수 🌽
17.04.202502:44
𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐊 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐀 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐄𝐑
Reposted from:옥수수 🌽
15.04.202516:55
One of the well renowned “far-left, pro-DPRK” news outlets in South Korea (통일시대) accuses the new Syrian president, Ahmed al-Sharaa (also known as Jolani) of being a Jewish Mossad agent backed by Israel
14.04.202503:21
“Are you a far-right extremist?”
“No… just a liberal from 10,000 years ago”
“No… just a liberal from 10,000 years ago”
19.04.202510:15
I am pro-deep state by the way
18.04.202516:00
15.04.202514:23
Milton Friedman argued how countries would eventually all find a trade equilibrium and balance because of currency depreciation since massive trade deficits lead to currency depreciation.
Look at America nowadays. Huge trade deficits but the dollar remains strong, and that’s how Americans have access to cheap foreign commodities. Technically, both Hayek and Friedman were wrong.
Look at America nowadays. Huge trade deficits but the dollar remains strong, and that’s how Americans have access to cheap foreign commodities. Technically, both Hayek and Friedman were wrong.
19.04.202508:58
Lee Jae Myung dominates the Democratic presidential primary in the 충청 (Chung-Cheong) region by winning 88% of the vote, clearing everyone by miles.
18.04.202508:02
2028 National GOP Primary (If Donald Trump Is Running For a 3rd Term)
🔴 Trump: 56% (+37)
🔴 Vance: 19%
🔴 DeSantis: 4%
🔴 Haley: 3%
🔴 Ramaswamy: 3%
🔴 Rubio: 2%
🔴 Gabbard: 2%
Yale | April 1-3 | 1,435 RV
Reference: https://x.com/opensourcezone/status/1912252930075553804?s=46&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
🔴 Trump: 56% (+37)
🔴 Vance: 19%
🔴 DeSantis: 4%
🔴 Haley: 3%
🔴 Ramaswamy: 3%
🔴 Rubio: 2%
🔴 Gabbard: 2%
Yale | April 1-3 | 1,435 RV
Reference: https://x.com/opensourcezone/status/1912252930075553804?s=46&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
16.04.202514:44
15.04.202502:20
This is a transcript of Heinrich Himmler’s speech delivered to the Reich and Gau leaders in prison (1943) which literally “depicts” how Slavs are intellectually inferior and if there exist any “racially good ones,” Germans should take their children or kill them if the Polish Slavs dare to resist.
Here is the brief translation:
“𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘗𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵: 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷. 𝘛𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦. 𝘕𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳. 𝘞𝘩𝘰𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷, 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘮 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷. 𝘖𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘺, 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴.”
𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝙱𝙰𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝙽𝚂 𝟷𝟿/𝟺𝟶𝟷𝟶 𝚁𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚁𝚎𝚒𝚌𝚑𝚜 - 𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝙶𝚊𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝙿𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚗, 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟹, 𝚙.𝟹𝟹𝟽
Here is the brief translation:
“𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘬𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘗𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵: 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷. 𝘛𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦. 𝘕𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳. 𝘞𝘩𝘰𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷, 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘮 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘤 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷. 𝘖𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘷 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘺, 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴.”
𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝙱𝙰𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝙽𝚂 𝟷𝟿/𝟺𝟶𝟷𝟶 𝚁𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚁𝚎𝚒𝚌𝚑𝚜 - 𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝙶𝚊𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝙿𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚗, 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟹, 𝚙.𝟹𝟹𝟽
Shown 1 - 24 of 609
Log in to unlock more functionality.