Wisconsin Election integrity Channel
转发自:
The Library
05.02.202506:44
A lot of people are missing this. Who pays the democrat fraud machine? Who conducts the Democrat election fraud?
NGOs do the work. The ballot harvesting & stuffing. The mules. The stash houses. The transportation & injection of ballots. The filling out of harvested ballots. The registration of dead people, out of state people, illegals. The machines. All of it.
Who pays NGOs?
USAID.
What happens if that money stops?
NGOs do the work. The ballot harvesting & stuffing. The mules. The stash houses. The transportation & injection of ballots. The filling out of harvested ballots. The registration of dead people, out of state people, illegals. The machines. All of it.
Who pays NGOs?
USAID.
What happens if that money stops?
转发自:
The Federalist
05.02.202500:06
How Democrats Plan To Use Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election To Rig The 2026 Midterms
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/how-democrats-plan-to-use-wisconsins-supreme-court-election-to-rig-the-2026-midterms/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/how-democrats-plan-to-use-wisconsins-supreme-court-election-to-rig-the-2026-midterms/ • @FDRLSTT
04.02.202523:11
Peter Bernegger was on the Alex Jones show today at 1pmCST to expose the liberal hive of 55,000 NGO's getting federal monies to tear down our beloved country.
https://x.com/realalexjones/status/1886821877730922676?s=46
https://x.com/realalexjones/status/1886821877730922676?s=46
转发自:
Peter Bernegger
04.02.202520:38
thefractalgovernment.com note our site has been crashing due to high volume, it is back up now. Go to the site, scroll down, and see various videos on the left side.
We've identified the Fifth Branch of Government: NGO's using federal tax dollars for anti-American activities. All 55,000 of them and how they are connected.
The 4:11-minute video about the Sixteen Thirty Fund is on the website. It shows how this one NGO is connected to over 10,000 other ones, via the money flows and officers/directors
~ Peter Bernegger
We've identified the Fifth Branch of Government: NGO's using federal tax dollars for anti-American activities. All 55,000 of them and how they are connected.
The 4:11-minute video about the Sixteen Thirty Fund is on the website. It shows how this one NGO is connected to over 10,000 other ones, via the money flows and officers/directors
~ Peter Bernegger
01.02.202518:35
Blue State Employee Arrested for Allegedly Changing Voter Registrations to “Democrat”
FULL STORY: https://theamericantribune.com/blue-state-employee-arrested-for-allegedly-changing-voter-registrations-to-democrat/?utm_source=TATTGR
FULL STORY: https://theamericantribune.com/blue-state-employee-arrested-for-allegedly-changing-voter-registrations-to-democrat/?utm_source=TATTGR
转发自:The Federalist
05.02.202506:42
Illegal Alien Allegedly Stole U.S. Citizen’s Identity, Committed Voter Fraud
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/illegal-alien-allegedly-stole-u-s-citizens-identity-committed-voter-fraud/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/illegal-alien-allegedly-stole-u-s-citizens-identity-committed-voter-fraud/ • @FDRLSTT
转发自:The Federalist
05.02.202500:06
Michigan’s Next Elections Could Determine The Direction Of National Politics
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/michigans-next-elections-could-determine-the-direction-of-national-politics/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/michigans-next-elections-could-determine-the-direction-of-national-politics/ • @FDRLSTT
转发自:Peter Bernegger
04.02.202520:38
See how the Chinese Progressive Group NGO is funding anti-American activities across the USA.
We mapped it all out, the people connected, the dollar amounts, when, to where, to the next place and the next such as funding the LBGT Outership non-profit, to the Islamic Services of Seattle, to lib. Vote Yes For Work.
All in just one year, all tax-exempt, heavily using federal government grants from the US Treasury. And no one is watching....until President Trump thankfully paused all this last week in an executive order (it is still valid, the federal court did not stop it).
thefractalgovernment.com/?p=339 or try this
link: https://rumble.com/v5qlmct-who-is-funding-the-leftist-ngos.html
~ Peter Bernegger
We mapped it all out, the people connected, the dollar amounts, when, to where, to the next place and the next such as funding the LBGT Outership non-profit, to the Islamic Services of Seattle, to lib. Vote Yes For Work.
All in just one year, all tax-exempt, heavily using federal government grants from the US Treasury. And no one is watching....until President Trump thankfully paused all this last week in an executive order (it is still valid, the federal court did not stop it).
thefractalgovernment.com/?p=339 or try this
link: https://rumble.com/v5qlmct-who-is-funding-the-leftist-ngos.html
~ Peter Bernegger
04.02.202519:00
02.02.202515:50
01.02.202515:02
Here’s the real reason the census director is getting out of town.
https://skeshel.substack.com/p/the-us-census-bureau-stole-at-least
https://skeshel.substack.com/p/the-us-census-bureau-stole-at-least
转发自:Peter Bernegger
05.02.202502:12
He knows, Jack Posobiec knows! Listen to his 1:17min video and focus on the last five seconds. 😎
Will make more sense if you watch my appearance today with Alex Jones, now on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6h1fsj-the-smoking-gun-globalistthird-templer-monetary-laundering-system-alex-jone.html
~ Peter Bernegger
Will make more sense if you watch my appearance today with Alex Jones, now on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6h1fsj-the-smoking-gun-globalistthird-templer-monetary-laundering-system-alex-jone.html
~ Peter Bernegger
转发自:The Federalist
05.02.202500:05
Leftist Wisconsin Senator Confuses ‘Coup’ With Will Of The People
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/leftist-wisconsin-senator-confuses-coup-with-will-of-the-people/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/04/leftist-wisconsin-senator-confuses-coup-with-will-of-the-people/ • @FDRLSTT
转发自:Peter Bernegger
04.02.202520:38
Astounding waste of our tax dollars: via NGO's we and many others have been exposing, full thread: https://x.com/datarepublican/status/1885711150983324009?s=46&t=W6zUB1LF65aDwlchV5RmyQ
~ Peter Bernegger
~ Peter Bernegger
04.02.202500:31
02.02.202515:49
Dear WI observer!
I'm sure we are all enjoying the Trump victory!! But in Wisconsin there is still a lot of work that has to get done!
The Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) has submitted observer permanent administrative rules to the Wisconsin Legislature. It is called CR24-032. They took the Wisconsin Statute 7.41 Public’s Right to Access and expanded the rules for observers. These rules (17 pages!), if passed, will have the full effect of the law. If they don’t pass, we continue to act according to the existing 7.41 statute as we always have.
This call to action is a request for each of you to communicate your opinion of these rules. If you are able to attend the hearing:
Tuesday, February 4, 2025
10:00 AM
Madison, WI Capitol Bldg
2 East Main Street
Room: 328 Northwest
If you cannot attend in person, please send your comments by Monday, Feb 3rd at noon (cc your Wisconsin State Representative to your email). When contacting your Assembly Rep. please state you do not want the rules as written in CR24-032 to be passed and your reasons why (state a few things if you'd like).
It is highly preferable to present your comments in person. No time limit has been set, but suggest you keep your comments to around 3 minutes or less. There will be two WEC Commissioners present to defend their rule; one Republican and one Democrat.
It’s extremely important that they hear from those that have observing experience and will continue to participate. WE are part of the election process and are the ones that will feel the full force of these rules if they are passed!
There are many statutes stated in the attached rules document so please look them up if you need clarity. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes
The issues with these rules, but are not limited to, are the following:
1) It’s excessive. The language controls every single move an observer may make or take.
2) The positioning of observers in a polling place throughout the entire text is too restrictive. The chief would be allowed to restrict observers to one area. If we are restricted to one area, we simply cannot observe "all public aspects of the voting process". Remember, it was a Milwaukee observer that was able to get close enough to a tabulator that triggered a recount in Milwaukee during the last election.
3) The 3 to 8 feet restriction in § 7.41 is restrictive enough. How many observers already experience chiefs that concentrate on the 8 foot part of the statute and forget that we can be as close as 3 feet?
4) Having access to restrooms (see EL4.03(8)), is agreeably a good thing, but that was only an issue because of the actions of two clerks in Racine, and it was already resolved for the 2024 November election. I believe this is a “humane” issue, not an issue where a law has to be made.
5) EL 4.04 states: No observer may create or transmit photographs, videos, or audio recordings of any observable location except as expressly permitted. This rule restricts the ability of observers at central count locations to have supporting evidence of their complaints.
5) There are many chiefs that allow observers into the polling place before 7:00 start time to get settled and observe the zeroing of the tabulators. EL4.05(1)(a) does not allow for that.
6) Observing the return of absentee ballots by the US Postal Service to a clerk’s office or alternate site would not be allowed in some instances. See EL4.05(2)(a).
I'm sure we are all enjoying the Trump victory!! But in Wisconsin there is still a lot of work that has to get done!
The Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) has submitted observer permanent administrative rules to the Wisconsin Legislature. It is called CR24-032. They took the Wisconsin Statute 7.41 Public’s Right to Access and expanded the rules for observers. These rules (17 pages!), if passed, will have the full effect of the law. If they don’t pass, we continue to act according to the existing 7.41 statute as we always have.
This call to action is a request for each of you to communicate your opinion of these rules. If you are able to attend the hearing:
Tuesday, February 4, 2025
10:00 AM
Madison, WI Capitol Bldg
2 East Main Street
Room: 328 Northwest
If you cannot attend in person, please send your comments by Monday, Feb 3rd at noon (cc your Wisconsin State Representative to your email). When contacting your Assembly Rep. please state you do not want the rules as written in CR24-032 to be passed and your reasons why (state a few things if you'd like).
It is highly preferable to present your comments in person. No time limit has been set, but suggest you keep your comments to around 3 minutes or less. There will be two WEC Commissioners present to defend their rule; one Republican and one Democrat.
It’s extremely important that they hear from those that have observing experience and will continue to participate. WE are part of the election process and are the ones that will feel the full force of these rules if they are passed!
There are many statutes stated in the attached rules document so please look them up if you need clarity. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes
The issues with these rules, but are not limited to, are the following:
1) It’s excessive. The language controls every single move an observer may make or take.
2) The positioning of observers in a polling place throughout the entire text is too restrictive. The chief would be allowed to restrict observers to one area. If we are restricted to one area, we simply cannot observe "all public aspects of the voting process". Remember, it was a Milwaukee observer that was able to get close enough to a tabulator that triggered a recount in Milwaukee during the last election.
3) The 3 to 8 feet restriction in § 7.41 is restrictive enough. How many observers already experience chiefs that concentrate on the 8 foot part of the statute and forget that we can be as close as 3 feet?
4) Having access to restrooms (see EL4.03(8)), is agreeably a good thing, but that was only an issue because of the actions of two clerks in Racine, and it was already resolved for the 2024 November election. I believe this is a “humane” issue, not an issue where a law has to be made.
5) EL 4.04 states: No observer may create or transmit photographs, videos, or audio recordings of any observable location except as expressly permitted. This rule restricts the ability of observers at central count locations to have supporting evidence of their complaints.
5) There are many chiefs that allow observers into the polling place before 7:00 start time to get settled and observe the zeroing of the tabulators. EL4.05(1)(a) does not allow for that.
6) Observing the return of absentee ballots by the US Postal Service to a clerk’s office or alternate site would not be allowed in some instances. See EL4.05(2)(a).
转发自:
Gateway Pundit
01.02.202515:00
Michigan State House Election Integrity Committee Chair Pledges to Look into Systemic Voter Fraud
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/michigan-state-house-election-integrity-committee-chair-pledges/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/michigan-state-house-election-integrity-committee-chair-pledges/
转发自:
Charlie Kirk
05.02.202501:57
BREAKING: Pam Bondi has just been confirmed as the new Attorney General of the United States in a 54-46 vote. John Fetterman was the lone Democrat to join with Republicans.
Congratulations to Attorney General Pam Bondi!!
Congratulations to Attorney General Pam Bondi!!
转发自:The Federalist
05.02.202500:05
Exclusive: Ohio Elections Chief Launches Portal Granting Citizens Greater Voter Roll Oversight
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/03/exclusive-ohio-elections-chief-launches-portal-granting-citizens-greater-voter-roll-oversight/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/02/03/exclusive-ohio-elections-chief-launches-portal-granting-citizens-greater-voter-roll-oversight/ • @FDRLSTT
转发自:Peter Bernegger
04.02.202520:38
Ban all electronic voting machines—they are being used to steal elections and are connected to the Internet.
See my posts above about the sworn testimony of a Verizon employee admitting internet connection of ES&S voting machines.
~ Peter Bernegger
See my posts above about the sworn testimony of a Verizon employee admitting internet connection of ES&S voting machines.
~ Peter Bernegger
04.02.202500:21
🔥 CALL TO ACTION 🔥
(H/T EBruders)
Here is a form letter that you can use as a template to object to The CR24-032 Rules if you cannot attend Tuesday's 2/4 hearing at 10am.
Please start by copying and pasting it into a new email by tonight, and send it to:
Connor.Hartje@legis.wisconsin.gov.
Please cc your State Representative to the email so they also receive it:
Subject: Objection to CR 24-032 Permanent Observer Rules
To: Assembly Committee on Campaign and Elections
Rep. Maxey (chair)
Rep Krug (vice-chair)
I oppose the proposed Permanent Observer Rules presented by the Wisconsin Election Commission for the following reasons:
Overly Restrictive: The rules micromanage every observer’s actions.
“Positioning of observers” is too restrictive: Observers should not be restricted to a single area, as voting is a public process. Various language in the Rules directly conflicts with Wisconsin Statute § 7.41 that states election observers are able to observe "all public aspects of the voting process". The 3- to 8-foot rule in §7.41 is restrictive enough. Many observers already experience chiefs that concentrate on the 8-foot part of the statute and forget that we can be as close as 3 feet.
Polling Place Access: Some chiefs allow observers in before 7:00 AM to observe tabulator zeroing, but EL 4.05(1)(a) prohibits this.
Absentee Voting in Residential Care Facilities and Retirement Homes: WEC egregiously ignores § 6.875(6)(b) that clearly states an observer can observe the election process in the room of a nursing home resident. It reads: “for purposes of the application of Wis Stat 7.41, the home or facility SHALL be treated as a polling place”. The word “SHALL” indicates something is mandatory. Observers are protected by the law to observe all aspects of the voting process wherever that may be taking place. Furthermore, closing of doors is a safety issue. Nobody has the authority to make a regulation that interferes with a statute. There isn’t one observer who cares about how someone votes. We care that the voting process was administered properly.
Absentee Ballot Observation: EL 4.05(2)(a) limits observing ballot returns in some cases.
Media vs. Observers: These rules allow media to film in polling places but prohibits observers from doing so. Absence of statutory authority.
Basic Accommodations: Access to restrooms and chairs shouldn’t require a law; prior issues have already been resolved.
Confusing & Vague Language: Many provisions, like EL 4.03(5), are confusing.
Lack of Election Official Accountability: No consequences for rogue election officials.
Blurry Definitions: EL 4.02 (12) and (13) need clarification, particularly on the meaning of “observe” (should include both seeing and hearing).
Photo ID Requirement: EL 4.04 (1) mandates ID without clear statutory authority.
In summary, I urge you to oppose these highly restrictive, confusing, broadly defined, bureaucratic rules as many conflicts with existing laws and/or have no statutory authority.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Information]
(H/T EBruders)
Here is a form letter that you can use as a template to object to The CR24-032 Rules if you cannot attend Tuesday's 2/4 hearing at 10am.
Please start by copying and pasting it into a new email by tonight, and send it to:
Connor.Hartje@legis.wisconsin.gov.
Please cc your State Representative to the email so they also receive it:
Subject: Objection to CR 24-032 Permanent Observer Rules
To: Assembly Committee on Campaign and Elections
Rep. Maxey (chair)
Rep Krug (vice-chair)
I oppose the proposed Permanent Observer Rules presented by the Wisconsin Election Commission for the following reasons:
Overly Restrictive: The rules micromanage every observer’s actions.
“Positioning of observers” is too restrictive: Observers should not be restricted to a single area, as voting is a public process. Various language in the Rules directly conflicts with Wisconsin Statute § 7.41 that states election observers are able to observe "all public aspects of the voting process". The 3- to 8-foot rule in §7.41 is restrictive enough. Many observers already experience chiefs that concentrate on the 8-foot part of the statute and forget that we can be as close as 3 feet.
Polling Place Access: Some chiefs allow observers in before 7:00 AM to observe tabulator zeroing, but EL 4.05(1)(a) prohibits this.
Absentee Voting in Residential Care Facilities and Retirement Homes: WEC egregiously ignores § 6.875(6)(b) that clearly states an observer can observe the election process in the room of a nursing home resident. It reads: “for purposes of the application of Wis Stat 7.41, the home or facility SHALL be treated as a polling place”. The word “SHALL” indicates something is mandatory. Observers are protected by the law to observe all aspects of the voting process wherever that may be taking place. Furthermore, closing of doors is a safety issue. Nobody has the authority to make a regulation that interferes with a statute. There isn’t one observer who cares about how someone votes. We care that the voting process was administered properly.
Absentee Ballot Observation: EL 4.05(2)(a) limits observing ballot returns in some cases.
Media vs. Observers: These rules allow media to film in polling places but prohibits observers from doing so. Absence of statutory authority.
Basic Accommodations: Access to restrooms and chairs shouldn’t require a law; prior issues have already been resolved.
Confusing & Vague Language: Many provisions, like EL 4.03(5), are confusing.
Lack of Election Official Accountability: No consequences for rogue election officials.
Blurry Definitions: EL 4.02 (12) and (13) need clarification, particularly on the meaning of “observe” (should include both seeing and hearing).
Photo ID Requirement: EL 4.04 (1) mandates ID without clear statutory authority.
In summary, I urge you to oppose these highly restrictive, confusing, broadly defined, bureaucratic rules as many conflicts with existing laws and/or have no statutory authority.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Information]
02.02.202515:49
7) WEC egregiously ignores § 6.875(6)(b) that clearly states an observer can observe the election process in the room of a nursing home residence. It reads: “for purposes of the application of Wis Stat 7.41, the home or facility SHALL be treated as a polling place”. The word “SHALL” indicates something is mandatory. Observers are protected by the law to observe all aspects of the voting process wherever that may be taking place. Furthermore, closing of doors is a safety issue. Nobody has the authority to make a regulation that interferes with a statute. There isn’t one observer who cares about how someone votes. We care that the voting process was administered properly.
8) Some of the verbiage is confusing (EL 4.03(5), for example).
We appreciate your help!
H/T EBruders
8) Some of the verbiage is confusing (EL 4.03(5), for example).
We appreciate your help!
H/T EBruders
转发自:The Federalist
31.01.202520:57
Lawsuit: Oregon SOS Destroyed ERIC Records Showing Wrongfully-Removed Voters
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/31/lawsuit-oregon-sos-destroyed-eric-records-showing-wrongfully-removed-voters/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/31/lawsuit-oregon-sos-destroyed-eric-records-showing-wrongfully-removed-voters/ • @FDRLSTT
显示 1 - 24 共 100
登录以解锁更多功能。