SUPER TRUTHERS
转发自:
High Ascension
03.04.202514:13
Yes, in a broader sense, it’s fair to say that both the deep state (entrenched government bureaucracy and elites) and the people (public perception, voting choices, and economic misunderstandings) share responsibility for many of the economic and political issues we see today.
### 1. The Deep State’s Role
The idea of a "deep state" refers to the entrenched bureaucracies, government agencies, and unelected officials who influence policy behind the scenes, often regardless of who is in elected office. Their impact includes:
- Policy Manipulation: Bureaucrats, lobbyists, and career politicians can steer policies in ways that serve special interests rather than the public good. This can include economic policies like tariffs, trade deals, and corporate regulations that benefit certain elites while hurting middle-class workers.
- Maintaining the Status Quo: Because bureaucracies are resistant to change, they often continue policies that are outdated or counterproductive, such as prioritizing globalization over national economic interests.
- Using Complexity as a Shield: Many policies are written in ways that make them difficult for the public to understand. This allows insiders to manipulate the system without accountability.
### 2. The People’s Role
While the deep state exerts significant influence, the general public also plays a part by:
- Not Educating Themselves: Many people form strong opinions based on emotion or political identity rather than taking the time to understand issues like tariffs, trade, or monetary policy.
- Short-Term Thinking: Voters often support policies that provide immediate relief (e.g., cheap foreign goods, stimulus checks) while ignoring the long-term consequences (e.g., job losses due to outsourcing, inflation).
- Falling for Media Narratives: The media shapes public perception, often oversimplifying complex issues or pushing ideological agendas. People who rely on mainstream narratives without critical thinking may unknowingly support policies that harm them in the long run.
### Conclusion: Shared Responsibility
It’s not just the deep state pulling the strings, and it’s not just the people making poor choices—both contribute to the cycle. The government bureaucracy creates systems that serve its own interests, while the public often fails to demand accountability or educate themselves on economic and political realities. Breaking this cycle requires transparency, better public education, and a willingness to challenge both entrenched power structures and popular misconceptions.
### 1. The Deep State’s Role
The idea of a "deep state" refers to the entrenched bureaucracies, government agencies, and unelected officials who influence policy behind the scenes, often regardless of who is in elected office. Their impact includes:
- Policy Manipulation: Bureaucrats, lobbyists, and career politicians can steer policies in ways that serve special interests rather than the public good. This can include economic policies like tariffs, trade deals, and corporate regulations that benefit certain elites while hurting middle-class workers.
- Maintaining the Status Quo: Because bureaucracies are resistant to change, they often continue policies that are outdated or counterproductive, such as prioritizing globalization over national economic interests.
- Using Complexity as a Shield: Many policies are written in ways that make them difficult for the public to understand. This allows insiders to manipulate the system without accountability.
### 2. The People’s Role
While the deep state exerts significant influence, the general public also plays a part by:
- Not Educating Themselves: Many people form strong opinions based on emotion or political identity rather than taking the time to understand issues like tariffs, trade, or monetary policy.
- Short-Term Thinking: Voters often support policies that provide immediate relief (e.g., cheap foreign goods, stimulus checks) while ignoring the long-term consequences (e.g., job losses due to outsourcing, inflation).
- Falling for Media Narratives: The media shapes public perception, often oversimplifying complex issues or pushing ideological agendas. People who rely on mainstream narratives without critical thinking may unknowingly support policies that harm them in the long run.
### Conclusion: Shared Responsibility
It’s not just the deep state pulling the strings, and it’s not just the people making poor choices—both contribute to the cycle. The government bureaucracy creates systems that serve its own interests, while the public often fails to demand accountability or educate themselves on economic and political realities. Breaking this cycle requires transparency, better public education, and a willingness to challenge both entrenched power structures and popular misconceptions.
转发自:High Ascension
03.04.202506:21
dollar remains the world's primary reserve currency, meaning that U.S. economic decisions—such as tariff impositions—have a global financial impact. When the U.S. imposes tariffs, it’s not just a tax on imported goods; it’s a signal that can cause shifts in global markets, affecting exchange rates and capital flows. Other countries with higher tariffs may not have the same currency leverage, meaning their tariffs, even if higher in nominal terms, might not exert the same global economic influence.
转发自:
WeirdShit3
03.04.202506:11
THE LOST PAST
Renard
Nothing New Under the Sun
https://x.com/MAGAgirlEmily/status/1907045454656729266?t=eEqfn7u5z03Yz4OeQszLTw&s=19
https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/1907190579164799304?t=FRFGagSAVBFGs5hrioSVmw&s=19
The Freaks⬆️
WAKE UP
🦊🗝👍
https://rumble.com/v6rk32j-the-lost-past.html
😮💩 Weird Shit3
https://t.me/WeirdShit03
Renard
Nothing New Under the Sun
https://x.com/MAGAgirlEmily/status/1907045454656729266?t=eEqfn7u5z03Yz4OeQszLTw&s=19
https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/1907190579164799304?t=FRFGagSAVBFGs5hrioSVmw&s=19
The Freaks⬆️
WAKE UP
🦊🗝👍
https://rumble.com/v6rk32j-the-lost-past.html
😮💩 Weird Shit3
https://t.me/WeirdShit03
03.04.202506:07
⚡️ Mar 31 2025 - Juan O Savin w/ PPN > The Census Bureau Is At The Core Of [Their] Corruption
Juan O Savin SITREP
* So Many Great Individual Patriots Are Sacrificing Their Personal Resources To Win This War > Many Names We May Never Know * Watch For DOGE Auditing The Census Bureau > This Will Destroy One Of The Biggest Roots Enabling [Their] Corruption *
--------------------------------------------------
Juan O Savin & Jennifer Mac
www.worldaccordingtojuan.com
www.TheJenniferMac.com
https://rumble.com/v6rkmb7--mar-31-2025-juan-o-savin-w-ppn-the-census-bureau-is-at-the-core-of-their-c.html
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
Juan O Savin SITREP
* So Many Great Individual Patriots Are Sacrificing Their Personal Resources To Win This War > Many Names We May Never Know * Watch For DOGE Auditing The Census Bureau > This Will Destroy One Of The Biggest Roots Enabling [Their] Corruption *
--------------------------------------------------
Juan O Savin & Jennifer Mac
www.worldaccordingtojuan.com
www.TheJenniferMac.com
https://rumble.com/v6rkmb7--mar-31-2025-juan-o-savin-w-ppn-the-census-bureau-is-at-the-core-of-their-c.html
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
11.04.202503:21
FULL MEETING: President Trump Holds a Cabinet Meeting from the White House - 4/10/25
Right Side Broadcasting Network
https://youtu.be/BVeaY4VDCCs?si=-E9vTp7cvG5LlXgp
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
Right Side Broadcasting Network
https://youtu.be/BVeaY4VDCCs?si=-E9vTp7cvG5LlXgp
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
03.04.202513:51
How Close Nazi Germany Came To Conquering Europe | WW2 in Color
The first 4 episodes of the landmark series World War II in Color cover from the unstoppable rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany in the 1930s to the turning point of the war in 1943. Remastered color footage paints the war to end all wars in a new light with stunning historical accuracy.
For more educational material similar to this video
Just visit here
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.me/PatriotsCreativeConcepts
The first 4 episodes of the landmark series World War II in Color cover from the unstoppable rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany in the 1930s to the turning point of the war in 1943. Remastered color footage paints the war to end all wars in a new light with stunning historical accuracy.
For more educational material similar to this video
Just visit here
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.me/PatriotsCreativeConcepts
转发自:High Ascension
03.04.202506:21
Trump’s tariffs not needing to be higher than other countries' tariffs could rest on several points related to economic policy and the global trade landscape. Here's a breakdown of a compelling argument:
America's Global Position: The United States is one of the largest economies in the world, with a GDP that allows it to exert significant influence over global trade. Given its size and the scope of its markets, it could be argued that the U.S. doesn't need to impose excessively high tariffs to encourage domestic production or reduce trade deficits. By imposing tariffs at a level that protects domestic industries without excessively disrupting global trade, the U.S. can strike a balance between self-protection and remaining competitive.
Market Influence: The U.S. has a large consumer market, and imposing tariffs can be a way to pressure other countries into addressing unfair trade practices. However, it doesn't need to be the highest tariff nation in the world to achieve this. A moderate tariff, when coupled with a strong domestic market and diplomatic pressure, can incentivize other countries to adhere to fairer trade practices.
The Impact on Global Supply Chains: Global supply chains are highly interconnected, and excessive tariffs could disrupt these systems, leading to higher costs for American consumers and businesses. The U.S. doesn't need to have the highest tariffs to address trade imbalances or unfair trade practices—targeted tariffs on specific sectors (such as steel or technology) might suffice. By focusing tariffs on certain key areas where trade imbalances are most severe, the U.S. can reduce its reliance on foreign imports without unduly impacting other industries.
Economic Diplomacy and Negotiation: The Trump administration often used tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations. A tariff rate that is too high might be seen as a barrier to diplomacy and could provoke retaliation, potentially harming American exporters. By having tariffs at a manageable level, the U.S. could engage more effectively in trade talks, ensuring that it benefits from better deals while avoiding excessive harm to its own economy.
Political Strategy: High tariffs were used as a political tool to signal to certain domestic industries that the government was taking action to protect jobs and reduce trade deficits.
America's Global Position: The United States is one of the largest economies in the world, with a GDP that allows it to exert significant influence over global trade. Given its size and the scope of its markets, it could be argued that the U.S. doesn't need to impose excessively high tariffs to encourage domestic production or reduce trade deficits. By imposing tariffs at a level that protects domestic industries without excessively disrupting global trade, the U.S. can strike a balance between self-protection and remaining competitive.
Market Influence: The U.S. has a large consumer market, and imposing tariffs can be a way to pressure other countries into addressing unfair trade practices. However, it doesn't need to be the highest tariff nation in the world to achieve this. A moderate tariff, when coupled with a strong domestic market and diplomatic pressure, can incentivize other countries to adhere to fairer trade practices.
The Impact on Global Supply Chains: Global supply chains are highly interconnected, and excessive tariffs could disrupt these systems, leading to higher costs for American consumers and businesses. The U.S. doesn't need to have the highest tariffs to address trade imbalances or unfair trade practices—targeted tariffs on specific sectors (such as steel or technology) might suffice. By focusing tariffs on certain key areas where trade imbalances are most severe, the U.S. can reduce its reliance on foreign imports without unduly impacting other industries.
Economic Diplomacy and Negotiation: The Trump administration often used tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations. A tariff rate that is too high might be seen as a barrier to diplomacy and could provoke retaliation, potentially harming American exporters. By having tariffs at a manageable level, the U.S. could engage more effectively in trade talks, ensuring that it benefits from better deals while avoiding excessive harm to its own economy.
Political Strategy: High tariffs were used as a political tool to signal to certain domestic industries that the government was taking action to protect jobs and reduce trade deficits.
03.04.202506:10
03.04.202505:59
Sinkhole opened in Cornish backyard, leading 300ft down into a medieval mineshaft
https://redd.it/1i80dxr
@r_interestingasfuck
https://redd.it/1i80dxr
@r_interestingasfuck
03.04.202514:16
17th you say
转发自:High Ascension
03.04.202506:23
The key point is that the U.S. doesn't need to impose higher tariffs because its economic power and global influence are more than sufficient to achieve the desired outcomes with moderate tariffs. The U.S. has the leverage of a massive consumer market, diplomatic influence, and its central role in global supply chains. This gives the U.S. the ability to use targeted, moderate tariffs as a tool to apply pressure and encourage fair trade practices without needing to resort to excessively high tariffs.
Just as in military strategy, where the focus is on precision, flexibility, and strategic leverage rather than overwhelming force, the U.S. can achieve its economic goals through well-calculated and measured tariffs. These moderate tariffs, combined with the U.S.'s global economic standing, can have a disproportionate effect, allowing it to exert influence and negotiate favorable trade terms without causing undue disruption to the global economy or its own domestic market.
In short, the strength of the U.S. economy means it doesn’t need higher tariffs to achieve its objectives—it’s the sheer power of the U.S. as an economic force that makes even moderate tariffs effective.
Just as in military strategy, where the focus is on precision, flexibility, and strategic leverage rather than overwhelming force, the U.S. can achieve its economic goals through well-calculated and measured tariffs. These moderate tariffs, combined with the U.S.'s global economic standing, can have a disproportionate effect, allowing it to exert influence and negotiate favorable trade terms without causing undue disruption to the global economy or its own domestic market.
In short, the strength of the U.S. economy means it doesn’t need higher tariffs to achieve its objectives—it’s the sheer power of the U.S. as an economic force that makes even moderate tariffs effective.
转发自:
MJTruth
03.04.202506:13
President Nayib Bukele accepted Donald Trumps invitation to the White House
April 14
April 14
03.04.202505:58
So, Mike Lindell's(The Kennedy's?) now owner of TikTok?
转发自:High Ascension
03.04.202512:48
The CIA's involvement in Japan began during the Allied occupation, with Charles Willoughby authorizing the creation of Japanese intelligence organizations called kikan.
Many members of kikan were war criminals, and the CIA utilized these groups for Operation "Takematsu," which gathered intelligence on North Korea, the Kuril Islands, and Sakhalin.
The "Hattori group," led by Takushiro Hattori, allegedly plotted a coup and attempted to assassinate Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida due to his opposition to Japanese nationalism.
Willoughby organized a force of over 2,500 intelligence personnel under the American Far East Command.
The CIA and military intelligence established extrajudicial agencies like the "Canon Organ," accused of illegal abductions and torture of left-wing activists, including novelist Kaji Wataru.
The CIA played a significant role in shaping Japan's political system, including financially supporting the creation of the Liberal Party.
The agency influenced the successor Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), guiding them to accept Nobusuke Kishi as prime minister and advising them on military and security policy.
The CIA helped establish an "iron triangle" dealing in tungsten to covertly finance the LDP.
The agency also allegedly subverted the Japan Socialist Party and interfered with anti-American protests in Okinawa.
Prior to the Treaty of San Francisco, CIA operatives arrived in Japan under Project BLUEBIRD to test behavioral techniques on suspected double agents.
US intelligence allegedly helped establish clandestine funds, including the M-fund, which enriched CIA contact Yoshio Kodama, who used the fund to secure Yakuza protection for President Dwight Eisenhower's canceled 1960 Japan visit.
Many members of kikan were war criminals, and the CIA utilized these groups for Operation "Takematsu," which gathered intelligence on North Korea, the Kuril Islands, and Sakhalin.
The "Hattori group," led by Takushiro Hattori, allegedly plotted a coup and attempted to assassinate Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida due to his opposition to Japanese nationalism.
Willoughby organized a force of over 2,500 intelligence personnel under the American Far East Command.
The CIA and military intelligence established extrajudicial agencies like the "Canon Organ," accused of illegal abductions and torture of left-wing activists, including novelist Kaji Wataru.
The CIA played a significant role in shaping Japan's political system, including financially supporting the creation of the Liberal Party.
The agency influenced the successor Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), guiding them to accept Nobusuke Kishi as prime minister and advising them on military and security policy.
The CIA helped establish an "iron triangle" dealing in tungsten to covertly finance the LDP.
The agency also allegedly subverted the Japan Socialist Party and interfered with anti-American protests in Okinawa.
Prior to the Treaty of San Francisco, CIA operatives arrived in Japan under Project BLUEBIRD to test behavioral techniques on suspected double agents.
US intelligence allegedly helped establish clandestine funds, including the M-fund, which enriched CIA contact Yoshio Kodama, who used the fund to secure Yakuza protection for President Dwight Eisenhower's canceled 1960 Japan visit.
转发自:High Ascension
03.04.202506:21
While the U.S. tariffs may be moderate in comparison to some other countries, they can still be highly potent due to the unique leverage the U.S. holds in the global economy. Here's why tariffs from the U.S. can be more impactful than those from other countries with higher tariffs:
1. The U.S. Consumer Market and Demand
Global Dependence on the U.S. Market: The U.S. represents one of the largest and most lucrative consumer markets in the world. Tariffs imposed by the U.S. carry significant weight because many countries rely on access to U.S. consumers. Even moderate tariffs can force foreign companies to adjust their trade practices, as losing access to the U.S. market is often more costly than paying the tariffs themselves. This gives U.S. tariffs disproportionate influence compared to those of other nations, even if those countries impose higher tariffs on goods entering their own markets.
2. Global Supply Chain Interdependence
Interconnected Global Trade: High tariffs from countries like China or the European Union may impact specific sectors, but the U.S. remains a critical node in the global supply chain. A moderate tariff imposed by the U.S. can have ripple effects across global industries, pushing companies to adapt to U.S. demands for fairer trade practices. This can force countries to alter their own tariffs and trade rules to maintain access to U.S. markets, demonstrating the potency of U.S. tariffs even if they are not as high as others.
3. Diplomatic and Strategic Leverage
Influence Beyond the Tariff Rate: The U.S. has significant diplomatic influence that amplifies the effectiveness of its tariffs. When the U.S. imposes tariffs, it often pairs them with negotiations, leveraging its global alliances and its position as a global economic leader. In many cases, the threat of tariffs, even at moderate rates, is enough to prompt other countries to make concessions in trade negotiations. The diplomatic context surrounding U.S. tariffs can make them more effective than those of countries with higher tariff rates but less global influence.
4. Retaliation and Global Market Effects
Other Countries' Retaliatory Tariffs: Many countries may retaliate to U.S. tariffs with higher tariffs of their own, but those retaliatory measures typically don’t carry the same weight. Countries with higher tariffs may rely on trade with the U.S. just as much, meaning that their retaliation could backfire and hurt their own exporters. In contrast, U.S. tariffs are often more strategically targeted and can be adjusted to avoid unnecessary economic harm to the U.S. economy, allowing for more effective pressure without jeopardizing the larger economic picture.
5. Economic Diplomacy and Negotiation
Tariffs as a Negotiation Tool: U.S. tariffs, even at moderate levels, are often used as leverage in broader trade negotiations. When other countries are faced with the prospect of losing access to the U.S. market, they may be more willing to engage in dialogue and make trade concessions to avoid the economic pain of higher tariffs. The U.S. can strategically adjust tariffs in negotiations, creating a dynamic of "carrot and stick" diplomacy. This gives the U.S. an advantage over countries with higher, more rigid tariffs that cannot easily adjust or use tariffs as a flexible negotiation tool.
6. Consumer Confidence and Domestic Impact
Balancing Domestic Interests: The U.S. can implement tariffs without unduly harming its own consumer base by targeting specific industries (e.g., steel or technology) rather than broadly taxing imports. By carefully adjusting tariffs, the U.S. can maintain a balance between protecting domestic industries and keeping consumer costs relatively stable. Other countries with high tariffs may experience negative domestic consequences as they try to protect their industries, leading to potential inflation or consumer unrest. In contrast, the U.S. can use moderate tariffs more strategically to minimize domestic disruption.
7. The Role of U.S. Currency and Economic Power
U.S. Dollar's Dominance: The U.S.
1. The U.S. Consumer Market and Demand
Global Dependence on the U.S. Market: The U.S. represents one of the largest and most lucrative consumer markets in the world. Tariffs imposed by the U.S. carry significant weight because many countries rely on access to U.S. consumers. Even moderate tariffs can force foreign companies to adjust their trade practices, as losing access to the U.S. market is often more costly than paying the tariffs themselves. This gives U.S. tariffs disproportionate influence compared to those of other nations, even if those countries impose higher tariffs on goods entering their own markets.
2. Global Supply Chain Interdependence
Interconnected Global Trade: High tariffs from countries like China or the European Union may impact specific sectors, but the U.S. remains a critical node in the global supply chain. A moderate tariff imposed by the U.S. can have ripple effects across global industries, pushing companies to adapt to U.S. demands for fairer trade practices. This can force countries to alter their own tariffs and trade rules to maintain access to U.S. markets, demonstrating the potency of U.S. tariffs even if they are not as high as others.
3. Diplomatic and Strategic Leverage
Influence Beyond the Tariff Rate: The U.S. has significant diplomatic influence that amplifies the effectiveness of its tariffs. When the U.S. imposes tariffs, it often pairs them with negotiations, leveraging its global alliances and its position as a global economic leader. In many cases, the threat of tariffs, even at moderate rates, is enough to prompt other countries to make concessions in trade negotiations. The diplomatic context surrounding U.S. tariffs can make them more effective than those of countries with higher tariff rates but less global influence.
4. Retaliation and Global Market Effects
Other Countries' Retaliatory Tariffs: Many countries may retaliate to U.S. tariffs with higher tariffs of their own, but those retaliatory measures typically don’t carry the same weight. Countries with higher tariffs may rely on trade with the U.S. just as much, meaning that their retaliation could backfire and hurt their own exporters. In contrast, U.S. tariffs are often more strategically targeted and can be adjusted to avoid unnecessary economic harm to the U.S. economy, allowing for more effective pressure without jeopardizing the larger economic picture.
5. Economic Diplomacy and Negotiation
Tariffs as a Negotiation Tool: U.S. tariffs, even at moderate levels, are often used as leverage in broader trade negotiations. When other countries are faced with the prospect of losing access to the U.S. market, they may be more willing to engage in dialogue and make trade concessions to avoid the economic pain of higher tariffs. The U.S. can strategically adjust tariffs in negotiations, creating a dynamic of "carrot and stick" diplomacy. This gives the U.S. an advantage over countries with higher, more rigid tariffs that cannot easily adjust or use tariffs as a flexible negotiation tool.
6. Consumer Confidence and Domestic Impact
Balancing Domestic Interests: The U.S. can implement tariffs without unduly harming its own consumer base by targeting specific industries (e.g., steel or technology) rather than broadly taxing imports. By carefully adjusting tariffs, the U.S. can maintain a balance between protecting domestic industries and keeping consumer costs relatively stable. Other countries with high tariffs may experience negative domestic consequences as they try to protect their industries, leading to potential inflation or consumer unrest. In contrast, the U.S. can use moderate tariffs more strategically to minimize domestic disruption.
7. The Role of U.S. Currency and Economic Power
U.S. Dollar's Dominance: The U.S.
转发自:MJTruth
03.04.202506:13
Dan Bongino sounding awfully familiar… 🤔
“Just because you don’t immediately see it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.”
“Just because you don’t immediately see it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.”
03.04.202506:08
4/2/25: THE LOST VOICES OF TRUE HEROES/ LIVE WITH FIELD MCCONNELL & RAYMOND CORRIVEAU
jjerread
PLZ LISTEN TO THESE TWO GENETLEMEN FIELD AND RAY 2 GENERATIONS OF THE MARINE COR TALK ABOUT THEIR EXPERIENCES.
THE LOST VOICES OF THE TRUE HEROES!!
https://rumble.com/v6rk955-4225-the-lost-voices-of-true-heroes-live-with-field-mcconnell-and-raymond-c.html
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
jjerread
PLZ LISTEN TO THESE TWO GENETLEMEN FIELD AND RAY 2 GENERATIONS OF THE MARINE COR TALK ABOUT THEIR EXPERIENCES.
THE LOST VOICES OF THE TRUE HEROES!!
https://rumble.com/v6rk955-4225-the-lost-voices-of-true-heroes-live-with-field-mcconnell-and-raymond-c.html
😇
https://t.me/JuanOSavinQVids2
转发自:
Insider Paper
03.04.202505:58
NEW 🚨 Amazon makes last-minute bid for TikTok: report
READ: https://insiderpaper.com/amazon-makes-last-minute-bid-for-tiktok-report/
READ: https://insiderpaper.com/amazon-makes-last-minute-bid-for-tiktok-report/
显示 1 - 24 共 422
登录以解锁更多功能。