Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

查看

Николаевский Ванёк

查看

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

查看

Труха⚡️Україна

查看

Николаевский Ванёк

查看

Scott Ritter

An experienced military and geopolitical analyst with a proven track record of accuracy and integrity.
Contact [admin] @n13cwg
Q&A @Ritter_Feedback_Bot
The Russia House with Scott Ritter https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=smnz

TGlist 评分

类型公开

验证

未验证

可信度

不可靠

位置Росія

语言其他

频道创建日期Бер 10, 2025

添加到 TGlist 的日期

Вер 17, 2023

我是频道所有者

变更历史

关联群组

Scott Ritter Chat

2.5K

Telegram频道 Scott Ritter 统计数据

详细信息

订阅者

94 209

24 小时

430%一周

265-0.3%一个月

1 574-1.6%

引用指数

0

提及1频道上的转发0频道上的提及1

每帖平均覆盖率

4 934

12 小时3 698

42.1%24 小时4 934

33.4%48 小时10 383

5.3%

参与率 (ER)

1.88%

转发13评论8反应84

覆盖率参与率 (ERR)

7.86%

24 小时0%一周

0.1%一个月

0.54%

每则广告帖子的平均覆盖率

2 781

1 小时1 58657.03%1 – 4 小时1 58857.1%4 - 24 小时1 95470.26%

详细信息

将我们的机器人连接到频道以了解该频道的受众性别。

过去 24 小时内的帖子数

1

动态

"Scott Ritter" 群组最新帖子

所有帖子

22.04.202518:44

AMERICA’S GLOBAL GAMBLE: WHAT HAPPENS IF IT ALL FALLS APART?
Interview for Dialogue Works

00:04 Russia's offensive and the buffer zone.
10:18 Reset and regime change.
21:09 The conflict in Ukraine and the West's mistakes.
35:50 Trump's peace plan.
50:19 Difficulties between the US and Europe.
01:00:33 Historical and modern conflicts in Europe.
01:05:39 US strategy in Asia.
01:12:54 Iran and the nuclear program.
01:19:06 Israel and Palestine.
01:29:11 Debate and criticism.
01:43:32 The importance of negotiations.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

22.04.202512:58

ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 255 Highlight

▫️Playing Rugby On the ISS.
▫️We Live In a Freaking Police State.
▫️The Serbs Had Their Nation Stolen From Them.

See the FULL EPISODE HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

22.04.202512:18

⁣ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 257

Live Stream Scheduled for April 22, 2025 at 3:00pm ET

You can submit your questions via voice or text message: https://ustourofduty.org

You can also call live, 🇺🇸 +1(520) 525-8359

Watch on ustourofduty.org, Odysee, Locals, X (formerly Twitter), Rumble, Facebook, Twitch, Telegram, VK

You can download the audio version of each episode on Spotify.

We're waiting for you!

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

22.04.202505:21

IS THE U.S. ABOUT TO QUIT UKRAINE PEACE TALKS?
Interview for India & Global Left

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

21.04.202520:18

CAN IRAN SURVIVE TRUMP?
Interview for Judging Freedom

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

21.04.202508:46

❗️ Join my friends at Geopolitics Live for daily breaking news and exclusive analysis.

Some of their latest bangers:

🇺🇦 How Ukraine became a human trafficking hub under Zelensky

💸 BlackRock is tightening its grip on global trade routes

☣️ Is USAID linked to secret bioweapons research?

👉🏻 Click here and subscribe to fresh doses of quality content.

21.04.202503:30

DEBATE CLUB: Israel & Palestine — Justified Force or Aggression?
Interview for 69 𝕏 MINUTES

A preview of my debate with Alan Dershowitz on Israel-Palestine.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

20.04.202511:16

The Russia House with Scott Ritter is an exclusive interview-based program with leading Russian figures, from journalists and writers to politicians and astronauts. In these conversations, they share their thoughts on history, social, political and cultural life in Russia, and their work.

There is no better antidote for Russophobia than fact-based truth, and there is no better source for fact-based truth about Russia than The Russia House with Scott Ritter.

Subscribe to The Russia House with Scott Ritter to get to know Russia better and understand its culture and history.

20.04.202504:54

EU FURIOUS OVER EVERYTHING
Interview for Garland Nixon

01:18 The book Highway to Hell.
11:30 Compromise on Ukraine.
22:30 Economic war and the role of Russia.
33:05 Economic potential of Central Asia.
37:56 European anti-Russian sentiments.
44:38 The new "big three".
55:19 The future of Europe.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

19.04.202517:56

ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 255 Highlight

▫️The Latest on Passport

See the FULL EPISODE HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

18.04.202518:36

⁣RUBIO’S THREATS TO QUIT UKRAINE PEACE TALKS LOOK LIKE SABOTAGE

Marco Rubio warned Friday that the US could walk out of the Ukrainian peace process if progress is not made "within days." A day earlier, Volodymyr Zelensky accused Trump Ukraine envoy Steve Witkoff of "spreading Russian narratives," and claimed Witkoff has no "mandate...to speak about Ukrainian territories."

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

18.04.202513:58

⁣ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 256

Live Stream Scheduled for April 18, 2025 at 8:00pm ET

18.04.202510:37

SPACE IS A TERRITORY OF FRIENDSHIP

⁣We had a good interview with Russian cosmonaut Oleg Artemyev.

Oleg shared with us his impressions of life and work in space. In between dangerous work in space, he and his colleagues play rugby and hockey and even plan a sambo tournament!

This interview was full of kindness and interesting communication. People of different cultures live and work together, and their friendship lasts a lifetime.

In the interview with cosmonaut Oleg Artemyev, you will learn about life and work in space from first-hand sources. Oleg Artemyev shares his personal impressions and experience gained during space flights.

Watch on The Russia House with Scott Ritter

18.04.202503:55

⁣ZIONISM, THE HUMAN PARASITOID

The tiny jewel wasp injects a neurotoxic venom into the ganglia of cockroaches, transforming the larger insect into a zombie which willingly allows itself to be transformed into a living host for the next generation of jewel wasps to feed on before emerging into the world, ready to prey on other unsuspecting cockroaches. Israel is the modern-day equivalent of the jewel wasp, a predator which infects its host with mind-altering poison so that it willingly sustains the parasitic intrusion into its being that will eventually take its life.

The host, in this case, is the United States. By allowing Israel to turn our nation into a zombified version of what our founding father’s envisioned, we simply facilitate our own collective demise.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

17.04.202517:52

⁣ENDGAME IRAN: PEACE OR WAR?

The past month has been a roller-coaster ride of escalatory rhetoric and military activity from the US and Iran, centered on the latter’s nuclear program. The Trump administration has labeled this program a potential existential threat to Israel and demanded it be dismantled. Iran, meanwhile, claims its program is a peaceful one that complies with its obligations as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Both Washington and Tehran walked this issue to the precipice before backing down and agreeing to negotiate. The US continues to maintain that a military option is still very much on the table, while Iran promises a devastating response if it is attacked. But for the moment, hostility has yielded to diplomacy.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

所有帖子

已广告2 小时

15.04.202515:38World Pravda

44.3K

已广告30 个月

30.09.202218:56Резидент

政治

已广告28 个月

28.09.202215:27Резидент

政治

详细信息

记录

28.11.202423:59

98.5K订阅者

02.02.202523:22

3300引用指数

10.05.202423:29

22.3K每帖平均覆盖率

02.10.202423:59

21.9K广告帖子的平均覆盖率

27.09.202423:59

28.36%ER

02.10.202423:59

22.74%ERR

发展

详细信息

订阅者

引用指数

每篇帖子的浏览量

每个广告帖子的浏览量

ERR

详细信息

Scott Ritter 热门帖子

所有帖子

05.04.202506:02

⁣It’s a tribal gathering.

If you took the time to truly “know your enemy”, you’d realize you just murdered a bunch of innocent civilians.

Instead you rely on ignorant drone operators who are under pressure to produce results because the truth is your air campaign hasn’t done anything to stop Houthi missile strikes against shipping or Israel.

Kids who don’t understand the culture of the people you have ordered them to kill.

Congratulations.

You’re no better than Obama.

And that’s a low bar.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

18.04.202503:55

01.04.202510:51

I’m always struck by the ignorance of the digital mob.

Especially those who claim to have “supported me all these years” and suddenly take umbrage over my assiduous insistence on adherence to international law by all parties.

If you truly knew me you’d know I cut my teeth on treaty compliance verification implementing the INF treaty.

Where I was deeply involved in a crisis that hinged on treaty interpretation that ultimately showed the Soviets were correct.

Yes, that meant that I and others argued against the official US position because the treaty which we were bound to argued the opposite.

You’d know that while I articulated sympathies with the Iraqi stance against Kuwait, I waged war against Iraq because the United Nations passed a Chapter VII resolution authorizing the use of military force because Iraq invaded and occupied Kuwait.

You’d know that while I agreed with the Iraqi complaint that even if they complied with UN demands to disarm (another Chapter VII resolution) sanctions would not be lifted, I was unyielding in implementing the disarmament mandate to the full extent required by international law.

You’d know that my stance against the war against Iraq was grounded in the fact that Iraq had complied with its disarmament obligations, and the US case was premised on a lie.

But that if Iraq was, in fact, non-compliant, then I believed military action would have been justified.

If you truly knew me, you’d know that my position has always been strict adherence to treaty obligations.

And that my interpretation of Iran’s compliance status is consistent under the NPT.

But you don’t know me.

You only pretend to.

And you know nothing of international law.

You are the digital mob. Charlatans all.

I’ve never said military action by the US is justified.

So don’t put words in my mouth.

In order for any military action against Iran to be justified you would either need Iran to attack another nation, triggering Article 51 of the UN Charter, or the UN Security Council would need pass a resolution under Chapter VII authorizing military force to resolve a clearly articulated threat.

An argument under preemptive self defense likewise fails because there is no imminent threat; even the emergence of a dedicated nuclear weapons program in Iran would not justify unilateral military action since there would be an opportunity to resolve the emerging threat through the United Nations.

So there are no existing circumstances that would justify and/or legitimize military action against Iran by the United States.

But that’s not the point.

Trump is on track to attack Iran.

This is reality. A reality I don’t support. A reality I condemn.

And a reality I am trying to avert.

Trump has articulated his case against Iran as being centered on Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons.

So my focus has been on how best to craft a pathway to peace.

One premised on Iran’s adherence to the letter and intent of the NPT.

You can disagree with my approach.

But don’t ever say that I am justifying a military strike by the US against Iran.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

12.04.202510:01

Today, April 12th, is Cosmonautics Day in Russia. This is the date of the first human spaceflight, which was performed on April 12, 1961, by Soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin on the Vostok spacecraft.

We are preparing an exclusive interview with a real astronaut for you!

We will learn about life in space, preparation for flights, impressions of what we saw from the porthole and much more. We will look beyond the limits of the Earth together with a professional!

Next week at The Russia House with Scott Ritter.

23.03.202508:41

Let’s make this as clear as possible:

Iran is a signatory to the NPT.

It has been since 1970.

Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Iran has said it is not seeking nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Supreme Leader has issued a religious edict prohibiting Iran from having nuclear weapons.

So everyone should be in agreement:

Iran is committed to adhering to a treaty obligation which prohibits it from having nuclear weapons.

There is no clause that provides an exception to this obligation because Israel has nuclear weapons.

Not even Iran makes that argument.

Last year a succession of Iranian leaders made statements which, when viewed in totality, call into question Iran’s intent when it comes to nuclear weapons.

In February 2024 Ali Akbar Salehi, a former leader of Tehran's nuclear program, said that Iran possesses all the necessary components for a nuclear weapon.

In April 2024 Ahmad Haghtalab, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander who serves as the head of security for Iran’s nuclear sites declared “It is possible and conceivable to revise the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear doctrine and policies to deviate from previously declared considerations.”

And in October 2024 nearly 40 members of parliament sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, its top security policymaking body, requesting that the council revise the defense doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran to permit development of nuclear weapons.

Statements such as these have prompted President Trump to make the denuclearization of Iran a top priority.

Trump recently sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme leader in which a stark choice was offered: negotiate or go to war.

Iran has indicated any attack against its nuclear facilities would likely cause them to change their nuclear doctrine.

It is believed Iran could rapidly move to build a believable nuclear weapon within a few weeks once the decision was made.

It is believed Iran’s critical nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.

So deep no conventional munitions could destroy them.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with conventional munitions that failed to achieve their objective of destruction, an Iranian nuclear weapon would be all but assured.

This is why Trump ordered the US nuclear posture and employment plans to be altered so that low-yield nuclear weapons possessing the ability to destroy underground facilities such as those housing Iran’s nuclear program would be developed and deployed.

Today the US has two nuclear weapons specifically fielded for this purpose: the B61-12 gravity bomb and the W-76-2 low yield nuclear warhead for use on the Trident submarine launched missile.

Both weapons are operational and deployed where they could readily be used against Iran.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with the goal of guaranteeing its destruction, he would have to use nuclear weapons preemptively.

This fits in with both the nuclear posture and implementation plan Trump signed off on which Iran specifically in mind.

There are those who say that by making this assessment, I am advocating for a nuclear strike on Iran by the US.

This simply isn’t true.

I’m providing an assessment, not soliciting in favor of war.

A war with Iran would be a disaster.

A nuclear attack on Iran by the US would be catastrophic.

I am firmly against both.

But that won’t stop me from providing the most accurate analysis of what I believe is actually happening today regarding Iran, whether I support such policies or not.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

07.04.202520:48

For weeks I have been advocating for a negotiated settlement to the crisis that has brought the US and Iran on the brink of war.

I have assiduously detailed the nature of the threat perceived by the US that, if unresolved, would necessitate military action, as exclusively revolving around Iran’s nuclear program and, more specifically, that capacity that is excess to its declared peaceful program and, as such, conducive to a nuclear weapons program Iran has admitted is on the threshold of being actualized.

In short, I have argued, the most realistic path forward regarding conflict avoidance would be for Iran to negotiate in good faith regarding the verifiable disposition of its excess nuclear enrichment capability.

Even when Trump alienated Iran with his “maximum pressure” tactics, including an insulting letter to the Supreme Leader that all but eliminated the possibility of direct negotiations between the US and Iran, my stance remained unchanged: this crisis could only be resolved through negotiation, and that if Trump took direct negotiations off the table, then Russia and/or China would have to step up and nail down a settlement through third party talks.

For opting to promote a reality-based process that provided the only viable path toward peace, I was viciously attacked and ridiculed by both the digital mob, comprised of new age philosophers, self-styled “peace activists”, and a troll class that opposes anything and everything it doesn’t understand (which is most factually-grounded argument), as well as people I had viewed as fellow travelers on a larger journey of conflict avoidance—podcasters, experts and pundits who did more than simply disagree with me (which is, of course, their right and duty as independent thinkers), traversing into the realm of insults and attacks against my intelligence, integrity and character.

Today we see the following:
Trump has softened his stance on Iran, narrowing his focus to exclusively nuclear issues—as I had predicted.

Iran has agreed to third party negotiations—as I predicted, and both Russia and China will be meeting with Iran in the coming days to discuss its nuclear program—as I predicted.

The Director-General of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, has announced he may be heading to Iran shortly to discuss Iran’s nuclear program—as I predicted.

The US-Iran crisis is grounded in the complexities, niceties and formalities of international law as set forth in the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT), which Iran signed in 1970 as a non-nuclear weapons state.

The NPT will be at the center of any negotiated settlement.

Those who dismissed the NPT and belittled the role of international law simply underscored their ignorance of the reality that surrounds Iran’s nuclear program.

While Israel may have exaggerated Iran’s nuclear capabilities over the years, and goaded the US to attack Iran because of the alleged threat posed by its nuclear program, the fact remains that this crisis has been triggered by the very capabilities Iran admits to having—stocks of 60% enriched uranium with no link to Iran’s declared peaceful program, and excessive advanced centrifuge-based enrichment capability which leaves Iran days away from possessing sufficient weapons grade high enriched uranium to produce 3-5 nuclear weapons.

This crisis isn’t about Israel or Israel’s own undeclared nuclear weapons capability.

It is about Iran’s self-declared status as a threshold nuclear weapons state, something prohibited by the NPT.

This is what the negotiations will focus on.
And hopefully these negotiations will permit the verifiable dismantling of those aspects of its nuclear program the US (and Israel) find to present an existential threat.

Peace is not guaranteed.

But war is unless common sense and fact-based logic wins out over the self-important ignorance of the digital mob and their facilitators.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

15.04.202508:38

UKRAINE IS A TOOL FOR THE WEST TO BRING DOWN RUSSIA
Interview for TV Rain Newsroom

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

14.04.202519:44

⁣RUSSIA MUST NOT ALLOW WEST TO USE SUMY ATTACK AS AMMO FOR PROPAGANDA WAR

The biggest problem with the April 13 missile strike against Sumy is the perception of this attack, attempts by propagandists to frame it as a war crime, may endanger the entire US-Russia peace process.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

03.04.202517:35

MI6 AGENT ZELENSKY? WHO CONTROLS THE UKRAINE ARMY?
Interview for Garland Nixon

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

23.03.202511:45

In the fall of 1992, when I was a weapons inspector in Iraq, we had hit an impasse with Iraq.

I had just finished a nine-month inspection campaign designed to account for Iraq’s SCUD missiles.

Iraq had initially lied in its declaration and tried to hold onto 100 missiles.

I helped expose the lie, then compel Iraq to tell the truth.

This meant carrying out inspections backed by the threat of military force.

In the end, Iraq told the truth, and we inspectors were able to verify this fact.

The Security Council had just passed a new resolution requiring Iraq to subject to the permanent monitoring of its dual-use facilities—pretty much any facility that could be used to help produce weapons of mass destruction.

Iraq refused, claiming that sanctions needed to be lifted first.

I was eating lunch with my Iraqi counterparts.

They made the point that there was no reason to cooperate since the US refused to lift sanctions until Saddam was gone.

I said that the law was clear—Iraq had to agree to monitoring inspections.

They replied such inspections would be tantamount to spying.

I sketched out a proposal on a piece of paper. Instead of having inspections like the ones I led come to Iraq every few weeks, why not allow an inspection team to carry out a three month survey of Iraq’s missile production capabilities, jointly with Iraq, and develop joint monitoring standards acceptable to both parties?

The Iraqi leadership accepted this, and thus began the interim monitoring program, which helped get Iraq to accept long term monitoring inspections and prevented a war.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

07.04.202505:57

⁣I have great news for you!

The book "Highway to Hell: The Armageddon Chronicles, 2015-2024" has been published, chronicling the biggest existential issue facing humanity: the threat of nuclear conflict.

Critical thinking about the dangers posed by nuclear weapons, the necessity of arms control, and the consequences of nuclear war has never been more urgently needed. "Highway to Hell: The Armageddon Chronicles, 2015-2024" affords the reader a comprehensive insight into these critical issues as they were unfolding, free of the circumspection and narrative management of conventional histories.

The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

02.04.202505:09

⁣TRUMP: “VERY BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN.” NETANYAHU WANTS THE U.S. TO DESTROY IRAN
By Dennis Kucinich

The U.S. Intelligence community, in its annual Global Threat Assessment, refuted Netanyahu’s oft-repeated claim about Iran building a nuclear weapon stating, "Iran is not building a nuclear weapon."

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

11.04.202508:02

SCOTT RITTER & MOHAMMAD MARANDI DEBATE IRAN VS. US WAR: TRUMP'S BIGGEST MISTAKE?
Interview for Danny Haiphong

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

10.04.202509:17

"HAMAS WON, ISRAEL LOST"—A WARNING TO THE WEST
Interview for Mario Nawfal

00:20 “There’s no threat from Russia.” The EU is wasting billions.
03:14 NATO without the U.S.? “They couldn’t even play Pop Warner.”
05:12 Russia’s goals in Ukraine are non-negotiable—and they’re winning.
08:42 “Russia has carrots. Trump has none.”
10:25 The G8 is dead—Putin’s betting on BRICS.
13:14 What Trump can do: speed up Russia’s victory, not stop it.
15:33 “Russia will never bend the knee.” Not for Trump. Not for the West.
20:33 Trump’s meeting al-Qaeda. Putin’s meeting Xi. Think about that.
26:50 Syria’s collapse: how the West lost—and HTS took over.
30:41 “Israel defeated itself.” Why Gaza changed the global map.
39:30 Hezbollah is bleeding—but far from broken.
43:26 Iran’s axis is faltering. Syria is gone. Hezbollah and Hamas are cornered.
47:29 Hamas should release the hostages now.
48:37 Trump’s Gaza plan = “multiple war crimes.”
50:57 “Trump will bomb Iran. And this time, it’s total war.”
56:08 Iran is blinking. Trump’s threats may be working—barely.
01:00:16 Will Trump’s tariff war crush China—or the U.S.?
01:06:54 “This is a revolution.” Why 2024 isn’t politics—it’s history.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

26.03.202513:26

Seven B-2 bombers deployed to Diego Garcia.

Numerous C-17 flights into Diego Garcia.

Ten KC-135 tankers to Diego Garcia.

An Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine in the Indian Ocean.

And there are those who still argue Iran shouldn’t negotiate to reduce its nuclear profile.

This is literally becoming a question of Iran’s existential survival.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

登录以解锁更多功能。