ะะธั ัะตะณะพะดะฝั ั "ะฎัะธะน ะะพะดะพะปัะบะฐ"
ะะธะบะพะปะฐะตะฒัะบะธะน ะะฐะฝัะบ
ะะฝัะฐะนะดะตั UA
โ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐ โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ค
This channel is dedicated towards defending the True Catholic faith and to teach catholics their True Faith and to realize it.
This channel is a Part of a Global Crusade. JOIN GLOBAL CRUSADE for Other Content LINK ๐
https://t.me/+vHkIuoh4e2BkZTVh
This channel is a Part of a Global Crusade. JOIN GLOBAL CRUSADE for Other Content LINK ๐
https://t.me/+vHkIuoh4e2BkZTVh
TGlist ่ฏๅ
0
0
็ฑปๅๅ
ฌๅผ
้ช่ฏ
ๆช้ช่ฏๅฏไฟกๅบฆ
ไธๅฏ้ ไฝ็ฝฎ
่ฏญ่จๅ
ถไป
้ข้ๅๅปบๆฅๆOct 21, 2023
ๆทปๅ ๅฐ TGlist ็ๆฅๆ
May 24, 2024"โ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐ โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ค" ็พค็ปๆๆฐๅธๅญ
17.05.202502:21
Protestantism Is IGNORANCE!
17.05.202501:54
โIf you believe what you like in the Gospels, and reject what you donโt like, it is not the Gospel you believe, but yourself.โ
Saint Augustine
Saint Augustine
16.05.202515:00
WHY DID THE CHURCH IN CORINTH APPEAL TO ROME AND NOT JOHN THE APOSTLE ?
One of the earliest pieces of evidence for the papacy comes from around AD 96, during a crisis in the Church of Corinth. Some presbyters had been unjustly removed, and guess who they turned to for help? Not the Apostle John, who was still alive and living closer to them in Ephesus, but Clement, bishop of Rome (Pope Clement I). That's huge. Think about it: Why would a church bypass a living apostle nearby and appeal all the way to Rome unless Rome already held a special authority? Clement didn't respond casually either. His letter (known as 1 Clement) is firm, authoritative, and calls for obedience. He even warns of spiritual danger for those who ignore his instructions. And the Corinthians accepted it! In fact, they read his letter publicly in their church for decades afterward.
One of the earliest pieces of evidence for the papacy comes from around AD 96, during a crisis in the Church of Corinth. Some presbyters had been unjustly removed, and guess who they turned to for help? Not the Apostle John, who was still alive and living closer to them in Ephesus, but Clement, bishop of Rome (Pope Clement I). That's huge. Think about it: Why would a church bypass a living apostle nearby and appeal all the way to Rome unless Rome already held a special authority? Clement didn't respond casually either. His letter (known as 1 Clement) is firm, authoritative, and calls for obedience. He even warns of spiritual danger for those who ignore his instructions. And the Corinthians accepted it! In fact, they read his letter publicly in their church for decades afterward.
16.05.202515:00
This shows that even before the New Testament canon was closed, the Church already recognized a kind of primacy in Rome. The bishop of Rome was seen not just as another leader, but as a shepherd for the whole Church, long before it was formalized at later councils. Early papacy? It was already in motion.
16.05.202514:18
St Cyril the Head Presider of Ephesus clarifies and tells us what it means. He says that Explanations of the creed which are added are not innovative additions but necessary additions for the sake of clarity
16.05.202514:18
EXPLANATION:
Papal Supremacy. The Power of a Pope is Higher than an ecumenical council.
Its true that At Ephesus they decided the Prohibition of Making of new Creeds .
But since the Supremacy of the Pope is Higher than the COUNCILS..... it is Possible since the Pope is Higher than the Council.... and the Council can NEVER be Higher than the Pope
Papal Supremacy. The Power of a Pope is Higher than an ecumenical council.
Its true that At Ephesus they decided the Prohibition of Making of new Creeds .
But since the Supremacy of the Pope is Higher than the COUNCILS..... it is Possible since the Pope is Higher than the Council.... and the Council can NEVER be Higher than the Pope
16.05.202514:18
Oopsies, did St Jerome just say to the Pope he can order a new creed above and better than the nicene creed for everyone to submit to ๐๐๐
16.05.202514:18
Firstly , Constantinople 1 Wouldn't be an Ecumenical council unless a Pope Validated and RATIFIED IT as a Council .It would have been a Mere Synod without Papal ratification
So what gave the Orthodox easterners the right to Add the the Latter half of the Creed to the existing Nicene Creed.
(Because the Creed we recite today is the Nicene-Constantinopolitan creed) .
If an Orthodox considers adding one word to the Creed to be "another creed," then wouldn't removing large chunks of the original Nicene Creed also qualify as "another creed"? If an Orthodox were to retort, "But the filioque clause is heretical, so it corrupts the Creed," then the Orthodox condemn themselves for being in communion with the Western Church, which taught the filioque. As Orthodox author Edward Siecienski notes, "by the late sixth century the filioque achieved a level of acceptance in the West bordering on unanimity,.
The Numerous Church fathers accepted the Filioque as well... the Orthodox have No reason to Reject it
So what gave the Orthodox easterners the right to Add the the Latter half of the Creed to the existing Nicene Creed.
(Because the Creed we recite today is the Nicene-Constantinopolitan creed) .
If an Orthodox considers adding one word to the Creed to be "another creed," then wouldn't removing large chunks of the original Nicene Creed also qualify as "another creed"? If an Orthodox were to retort, "But the filioque clause is heretical, so it corrupts the Creed," then the Orthodox condemn themselves for being in communion with the Western Church, which taught the filioque. As Orthodox author Edward Siecienski notes, "by the late sixth century the filioque achieved a level of acceptance in the West bordering on unanimity,.
The Numerous Church fathers accepted the Filioque as well... the Orthodox have No reason to Reject it
16.05.202514:18
St Basil himself says that the creed of Constantinople 381 added to the nicene creed and even was open to additions about the incarnation.
Well well well, I guess the consensus of fathers support the addition of the Filioque after all
Well well well, I guess the consensus of fathers support the addition of the Filioque after all
16.05.202507:03
Use this to shut the Anti-Catholic Protestants up.... since they're allergic to the truth and love to use Fallacious Reasoning to Justify their Wrongdoings
ๅทฒๅ ้ค16.05.202511:15
16.05.202505:28
15.05.202518:28
Use The Argument to Disprove Islam and Silence the Stupid islamists
15.05.202518:24
DEBUNKING ISLAM (The QURANIC Dilemma Argument) ๐
่ฎฐๅฝ
16.05.202523:59
1.7K่ฎข้
่
24.05.202423:59
0ๅผ็จๆๆฐ09.05.202523:02
562ๆฏๅธๅนณๅ่ฆ็็02.05.202515:01
344ๅนฟๅๅธๅญ็ๅนณๅ่ฆ็็18.04.202523:59
27.03%ER09.05.202520:01
33.69%ERRๅๅฑ
่ฎข้
่
ๅผ็จๆๆฐ
ๆฏ็ฏๅธๅญ็ๆต่ง้
ๆฏไธชๅนฟๅๅธๅญ็ๆต่ง้
ER
ERR
โ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐ โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ค ็ญ้จๅธๅญ
17.04.202503:15
Holy Thursday, also known as Maundy Thursday, commemorates the events of the Last Supper, where Jesus shared His final meal with His disciples before His crucifixion. On this day, He instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist, giving His body and blood under the appearance of bread and wine, and commanding His followers to "do this in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19). This day also highlights the institution of the priesthood, as Jesus, by washing the feet of His disciples, set an example of humility and service, instructing them to love and serve one another. Holy Thursday marks the beginning of the Easter Triduum, a time of reflection on the passion, death, and resurrection of Christ, and is observed with solemn Masses, foot-washing ceremonies, and adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, recalling Christ's sacrificial love for humanity.
Happy Holy Thursday
Happy Holy Thursday
16.05.202515:00
WHY DID THE CHURCH IN CORINTH APPEAL TO ROME AND NOT JOHN THE APOSTLE ?
One of the earliest pieces of evidence for the papacy comes from around AD 96, during a crisis in the Church of Corinth. Some presbyters had been unjustly removed, and guess who they turned to for help? Not the Apostle John, who was still alive and living closer to them in Ephesus, but Clement, bishop of Rome (Pope Clement I). That's huge. Think about it: Why would a church bypass a living apostle nearby and appeal all the way to Rome unless Rome already held a special authority? Clement didn't respond casually either. His letter (known as 1 Clement) is firm, authoritative, and calls for obedience. He even warns of spiritual danger for those who ignore his instructions. And the Corinthians accepted it! In fact, they read his letter publicly in their church for decades afterward.
One of the earliest pieces of evidence for the papacy comes from around AD 96, during a crisis in the Church of Corinth. Some presbyters had been unjustly removed, and guess who they turned to for help? Not the Apostle John, who was still alive and living closer to them in Ephesus, but Clement, bishop of Rome (Pope Clement I). That's huge. Think about it: Why would a church bypass a living apostle nearby and appeal all the way to Rome unless Rome already held a special authority? Clement didn't respond casually either. His letter (known as 1 Clement) is firm, authoritative, and calls for obedience. He even warns of spiritual danger for those who ignore his instructions. And the Corinthians accepted it! In fact, they read his letter publicly in their church for decades afterward.
่ฝฌๅ่ช:
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ โ๐๐ฅ๐
10.05.202503:13
Another example of prots not knowing Holy Scripture
็ปๅฝไปฅ่งฃ้ๆดๅคๅ่ฝใ
