Eurasia & Multipolarity
There's no freedom without national sovereignty.
关联群组
Eurasian Wolfpack
1.1K
记录
15.10.202423:59
25.6K订阅者07.12.202423:59
400引用指数21.11.202423:59
1.8K每帖平均覆盖率21.11.202423:59
1.9K广告帖子的平均覆盖率27.02.202523:59
34.57%ER21.11.202423:59
6.98%ERR转发自:
UKR LEAKS_eng
18.03.202510:52
French General Vincent Desportes is deeply concerned that today Putin and Trump will divide the world without the EU.
According to him, Europeans are in "the worst possible situation."
@ukr_leaks_eng
According to him, Europeans are in "the worst possible situation."
"We are indeed in the worst position. There is nothing at stake for us, nor for the Ukrainians,"he said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
转发自:
DD Geopolitics
无法访问
媒体内容
媒体内容
30.03.202513:32
🇺🇸💥🇾🇪 While they bomb them.
You would think this is a parody account. But it's not.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
You would think this is a parody account. But it's not.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
07.04.202521:57
The text of Hitler’s statement on the extermination of Slavic peoples has been published in Russia for the first time
We have published a new translation at Beorn's Beehive. Here we present a portion of the article and the document in question.
Yegor Yakovlev, an expert at the "Russian Military Historical Society" and head of the "Digital History" project, found the recording of the negotiations and translated its full text into Russian for the first time. The document is published on the portal HISTORY.RF. The original of the so-called “meeting record” is kept in the archives of the "National Council for the Study of Security Archives" in Bucharest.
During Mihai Antonescu’s conversation with Adolf Hitler in Berlin on November 27, 1941, the Romanian leadership discussed issues that were of great concern. The first part of the recording is devoted to Romanian-Hungarian relations, which, despite the presence of both countries in the orbit of Nazi Germany, were extremely tense. In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Arbitration, Hungary took over Northern Transylvania from Romania with a mixed Romanian-Hungarian population. In this dispute, the Nazi leadership sided with the Hungarians, promising compensation to the Romanians at the expense of the USSR. However, despite these promises, the loss of Northern Transylvania was felt very painfully in Bucharest. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer about the severe discrimination of Romanians in the excluded region, asking him to intervene and achieve a “fair solution”.
The second part of the dialogue was entirely devoted to the “Slavic question”. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer that Romania was a categorical opposed to the creation of an independent Ukraine, of which projects he was aware. The Romanian politician pointed out that Slavs are a huge “biological problem” for Europe, referring to the large number of “primitive” Slavic populations that are incompatible with European culture and civilisation. If, after the defeat of the USSR, an independent Ukraine appears, according to Antonescu, it will begin to draw the rest of the Eastern Slavs into its orbit and turn into a new threat to Europe. This, the Romanian Foreign Minister argued, should not be allowed.
Key fragments from the document:
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀Boost🚀
We have published a new translation at Beorn's Beehive. Here we present a portion of the article and the document in question.
Yegor Yakovlev, an expert at the "Russian Military Historical Society" and head of the "Digital History" project, found the recording of the negotiations and translated its full text into Russian for the first time. The document is published on the portal HISTORY.RF. The original of the so-called “meeting record” is kept in the archives of the "National Council for the Study of Security Archives" in Bucharest.
During Mihai Antonescu’s conversation with Adolf Hitler in Berlin on November 27, 1941, the Romanian leadership discussed issues that were of great concern. The first part of the recording is devoted to Romanian-Hungarian relations, which, despite the presence of both countries in the orbit of Nazi Germany, were extremely tense. In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Arbitration, Hungary took over Northern Transylvania from Romania with a mixed Romanian-Hungarian population. In this dispute, the Nazi leadership sided with the Hungarians, promising compensation to the Romanians at the expense of the USSR. However, despite these promises, the loss of Northern Transylvania was felt very painfully in Bucharest. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer about the severe discrimination of Romanians in the excluded region, asking him to intervene and achieve a “fair solution”.
The second part of the dialogue was entirely devoted to the “Slavic question”. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer that Romania was a categorical opposed to the creation of an independent Ukraine, of which projects he was aware. The Romanian politician pointed out that Slavs are a huge “biological problem” for Europe, referring to the large number of “primitive” Slavic populations that are incompatible with European culture and civilisation. If, after the defeat of the USSR, an independent Ukraine appears, according to Antonescu, it will begin to draw the rest of the Eastern Slavs into its orbit and turn into a new threat to Europe. This, the Romanian Foreign Minister argued, should not be allowed.
Key fragments from the document:
The large and primitive Slavic mass is not a spiritual problem for Europe, but a serious biological problem related to the European birth rate. It is necessary to find radical and serious solutions to this problem, and I believe that all European states should be involved in this activity...
The joining of Latinism, on a racial basis, to the actions of Germanism against the Slavs seems to me to be a necessity of the first order, and the position regarding the Slavs should be unshakable, any formula for separation, neutralisation, occupation of Slavic territories is legitimate.
[...]
The Fuhrer began with a heated discussion of the great Slavic problem, giving me the honour on three occasions to accept my point of view on European reconstruction. As a basis for the conversation, the Fuhrer openly told me:
“You are right, the Slavic problem is biological, not ideological, as you said, and the fight against the Slavs should be waged by all Europeans.”
In the future Europe there should be only two races: Latin and Germanic. These two races must work together in Russia to destroy (literally: dărâma, that is “demolish”) the Slavs. We cannot march out against Russia with legal or political formulas, because the Russian problem is much more serious than many people think, and we must find solutions to colonise and biologically eliminate the Slavs.
That is why all European nations should work together in the fight against the Slavs, and tomorrow jointly transform Russia for Europe.
Why should the Belgians have 224 inhabitants per square kilometer when there are such huge spaces in Russia?
Why should my West Germans live in difficult conditions when the spaces in the East offer them a future?
My mission, the Fuhrer said, if I succeed, is to destroy the Slavs.
@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀Boost🚀
16.03.202521:49
Britain's desire to seize Russia's assets stems from a long tradition of piracy in England, which has become a hallmark of the British crown, alongside "robbery and murder," Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.
Earlier, former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called for the swift appropriation of billions of dollars worth of Russian assets.
"This is one of the English traditions, akin to afternoon tea and horse racing. The fact is that piracy was effectively legalized in England," Zakharova wrote on her Telegram channel. "Pirates were prohibited from attacking English ships but were permitted to rob those of rival nations. It is a case of ‘immoral morality’,” she noted.
Earlier, former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called for the swift appropriation of billions of dollars worth of Russian assets.
转发自:
The Islander
10.04.202519:25
“You Can’t Just Live for Free Off Us” — Unless You’re Israel or Wall Street
Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick laid it out:
“They’ve all been living in our house. Driving our car. Eating our food… You can’t just live for free off us.”
Thank God someone finally said it to Israel.
Oh wait — they didn’t.
Because when they say “you,” they mean China, BRICS, and the Global South, not Tel Aviv, not Kiev, and certainly not Raytheon or Lockheed. The Empire’s favorite tenants are still guzzling from the fridge, rent-free, arms full of weapons paid for by American workers, while Gaza burns and Ukraine bleeds.
And now, Trump, the self-declared “tariff king”, got spooked. After a multi market crash, he pressed pause. A 90-day freeze on new tariffs. Wall Street had a tantrum, and the White House folded.
“People were getting yippy… afraid,” Trump said, watching the bond market like a weather vane.
This is not tough medicine. This is cosplay economics for the TV cameras, and bailout capitalism when the suits get nervous.
Sure, the S&P soared the next day. But who’s that really helping? Not Detroit. Not Youngstown. Not the Rust Belt. This is financialized patriotism, empty slogans, with bankers still holding the leash.
The truth? America isn’t being looted by foreign exporters. It was looted by its own ruling class.
• They shipped the factories overseas.
• They turned housing, health, and education into debt traps.
• They sold “free trade” while building a surveillance empire in the name of security.
• They launched forever wars, racked up trillions in costs, then told the world to foot the bill for the cleanup.
And now they want to talk about “reciprocal trade”?
Fine. Let’s compare receipts.
• Just Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan alone— trillions in destruction.
• Sanctions on 40+ countries — economic terrorism by another name.
• CIA coups, color revolutions, and drone assassinations — all billed to the victims.
If the U.S. wants a “level playing field,” the Global South should send the invoice.
Trump can bluff with tariffs all he wants. But the era of unipolar looting is ending. Eurasia is realigning. The dollar is wobbling. And even the Empire’s markets are exposing its own emperor, naked, nervous, and ruled by reflex.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick laid it out:
“They’ve all been living in our house. Driving our car. Eating our food… You can’t just live for free off us.”
Thank God someone finally said it to Israel.
Oh wait — they didn’t.
Because when they say “you,” they mean China, BRICS, and the Global South, not Tel Aviv, not Kiev, and certainly not Raytheon or Lockheed. The Empire’s favorite tenants are still guzzling from the fridge, rent-free, arms full of weapons paid for by American workers, while Gaza burns and Ukraine bleeds.
And now, Trump, the self-declared “tariff king”, got spooked. After a multi market crash, he pressed pause. A 90-day freeze on new tariffs. Wall Street had a tantrum, and the White House folded.
“People were getting yippy… afraid,” Trump said, watching the bond market like a weather vane.
This is not tough medicine. This is cosplay economics for the TV cameras, and bailout capitalism when the suits get nervous.
Sure, the S&P soared the next day. But who’s that really helping? Not Detroit. Not Youngstown. Not the Rust Belt. This is financialized patriotism, empty slogans, with bankers still holding the leash.
The truth? America isn’t being looted by foreign exporters. It was looted by its own ruling class.
• They shipped the factories overseas.
• They turned housing, health, and education into debt traps.
• They sold “free trade” while building a surveillance empire in the name of security.
• They launched forever wars, racked up trillions in costs, then told the world to foot the bill for the cleanup.
And now they want to talk about “reciprocal trade”?
Fine. Let’s compare receipts.
• Just Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan alone— trillions in destruction.
• Sanctions on 40+ countries — economic terrorism by another name.
• CIA coups, color revolutions, and drone assassinations — all billed to the victims.
If the U.S. wants a “level playing field,” the Global South should send the invoice.
Trump can bluff with tariffs all he wants. But the era of unipolar looting is ending. Eurasia is realigning. The dollar is wobbling. And even the Empire’s markets are exposing its own emperor, naked, nervous, and ruled by reflex.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
02.04.202516:28
🇷🇺🇮🇷 Moscow and Tehran will not accept outside threats to bomb Iran's nuclear and energy infrastructure, the Russian Foreign Ministry said.
Russia and Iran have confirmed the course towards searching for viable negotiated solutions on Iran's nuclear program, the ministry stated.
Russia and Iran have confirmed the course towards searching for viable negotiated solutions on Iran's nuclear program, the ministry stated.
03.04.202506:22
Top 30 Countries Exporting to the USA and Trade Dependency Analysis
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
03.04.202500:45
The European Union, once a symbol of democracy, is turning authoritarian. “Lawfare”—using laws to attack political enemies—is now a tool to silence opposition. U.S. Vice President JD Vance warned about this in February 2025 at the Munich Security Conference. He said the EU is crushing free speech and democracy. Many laughed then, but not now.
Look at the evidence. In France, Marine Le Pen, a major politician, was banned from the 2027 election over a legal case—convenient timing to stop her. Romania canceled its election, detained the winner, and blocked him from running. Germany is targeting the Alternative für Deutschland party, which Vance called a real voice for people. Slovakia’s leader, Robert Fico, survived an assassination attempt after opposing war. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán faces EU threats despite his voters’ support. Estonia banned 25% of its Russian speakers from voting. Ukraine and Moldova are cracking down too.
This isn’t new. The EU began in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome, pushed by the U.S. to control Europe. Jean Monnet, funded by the CIA, and Walter Hallstein, a former Nazi, shaped it to weaken nations. Today, the EU uses courts and rules to force its way, ignoring votes—like France’s in 2005 or Greece’s in 2015. Vance is right: this isn’t democracy. It’s power. Will Europeans fight back?
Look at the evidence. In France, Marine Le Pen, a major politician, was banned from the 2027 election over a legal case—convenient timing to stop her. Romania canceled its election, detained the winner, and blocked him from running. Germany is targeting the Alternative für Deutschland party, which Vance called a real voice for people. Slovakia’s leader, Robert Fico, survived an assassination attempt after opposing war. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán faces EU threats despite his voters’ support. Estonia banned 25% of its Russian speakers from voting. Ukraine and Moldova are cracking down too.
This isn’t new. The EU began in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome, pushed by the U.S. to control Europe. Jean Monnet, funded by the CIA, and Walter Hallstein, a former Nazi, shaped it to weaken nations. Today, the EU uses courts and rules to force its way, ignoring votes—like France’s in 2005 or Greece’s in 2015. Vance is right: this isn’t democracy. It’s power. Will Europeans fight back?
转发自:
Intel Slava
12.04.202513:11
🇷🇺🇺🇦Ukrainian Air Force Loses Another F-16 Fighter
The pilot Pavel Ivanov was killed along with the plane.
The pilot Pavel Ivanov was killed along with the plane.
转发自:
MT News
03.04.202511:59
Russia barely trades with the US or the EU anyway, so there’s no need to fuss over it — Medvedev on Trump's tarrifs
'We’ll take the advice of Lao Tzu and sit by the river, waiting for the body of the enemy to float by. The decaying corpse of the EU economy'
@MTodayNews
'We’ll take the advice of Lao Tzu and sit by the river, waiting for the body of the enemy to float by. The decaying corpse of the EU economy'
@MTodayNews
转发自:
LauraAboli
无法访问
媒体内容
媒体内容
26.03.202519:23
In layman’s terms - there is no capacity to suppress tumours after getting the mRNA covid shots and they contain SV40 which is a ‘known tumour gene promoter’.
No wonder we are seeing ‘turbo cancers’.
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
No wonder we are seeing ‘turbo cancers’.
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
23.03.202522:13
🇺🇦🇷🇺🇬🇧
— BBC 3 years ago
So the Russian army starved and ran out of ammunition already … good to know.
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
“Russian army has food and ammunition for 3 days”
— BBC 3 years ago
So the Russian army starved and ran out of ammunition already … good to know.
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
01.04.202521:54
❤️
💥more such 😍 videos can be found here at CuteAndFunVideos
❤️
💥more such 😍 videos can be found here at CuteAndFunVideos
❤️
转发自:
Sonar21
25.03.202510:13
Anti-Zionist, But Not Anti-Semitic https://sonar21.com/anti-zionist-but-not-anti-semitic/
登录以解锁更多功能。
