Act as an experienced academic researcher. Develop a strong, testable hypothesis for a study on [topic]. The hypothesis should be clear, concise, and based on existing scientific literature. It should propose a potential relationship or correlation between two or more variables related to [topic]. The hypothesis should also be designed in such a way that it can be disproven or affirmed through scientific methodologies. Ensure that the hypothesis aligns with the research objectives and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in this field.

"Analyze the potential overall impact of the following article: [Article Text/URL]. Consider its likely reach, influence on public opinion, potential to spark discussion, and significance within its field or topic area."

"Identify the primary and secondary target audiences for this article: [Article Text/URL]. Predict their likely reactions, points of agreement or disagreement, and how the article might influence their perceptions or behaviors."

"Evaluate the potential for this article to go viral or spread widely online: [Article Text/URL]. Analyze factors like its title, topic relevance, emotional resonance, shareability, and the likely platforms where it might gain traction."

"Assess the potential policy or real-world implications stemming from the information or arguments presented in this article: [Article Text/URL]. Could it influence decision-makers, trigger regulatory changes, impact business strategies, or lead to specific actions? Explain why or why not."

"Analyze how this article: [Article Text/URL] might impact the reputation of its subject(s), the author, and the publishing outlet. Consider potential positive or negative effects on credibility, trust, and public perception."

"Identify the potential controversies or debates this article might ignite: [Article Text/URL]. Outline the main points of contention and the likely stakeholder groups or viewpoints that would engage in these discussions."

"Evaluate the potential impact of this article on the [Specify Industry, Academic Field, or Community] sector: [Article Text/URL]. How might it affect current practices, ongoing research, market trends, or internal discourse within this specific group?"

"Predict the likely range of emotional responses this article might evoke in readers: [Article Text/URL]. Analyze the tone, language, and subject matter to determine if it's likely to generate anger, empathy, curiosity, fear, hope, etc., and among which groups."

"Assess whether the impact of this article: [Article Text/URL] is likely to be short-term (a brief spike in discussion) or long-term (influencing understanding or discourse for months or years). Justify your reasoning based on the article's content and context."

"If the article contains an explicit or implicit call to action, analyze its potential effectiveness: [Article Text/URL]. How likely are readers to take the suggested action based on the arguments presented and the way the call to action is framed?"

امنیت بیشتر برای کودکان و نوجوانان: حساب‌های زیر ۱۸ سال به تنظیمات امنیتی محدودتری منتقل می‌شن.

محتوای مناسب‌تر: برای کاربران زیر ۱۸ سال، محتوای نامناسب و تبلیغات محدود می‌شه.

نظارت والدین: والدین می‌تونن کنترل بیشتری روی فعالیت‌های آنلاین فرزندانشون داشته باشن.

جلوگیری از سوءاستفاده: سیستم به جلوگیری از دسترسی به محتوای نامناسب برای بچه‌ها کمک می‌کنه.

Prompt: "Identify and articulate the central research question, hypothesis, or main argument presented in the article. Summarize the core thesis in 1-2 sentences."

Prompt: "Critically evaluate the methodology employed in the study. Discuss its appropriateness for addressing the research question, its rigor, potential biases, and any limitations inherent in the chosen approach."

Prompt: "Summarize the main results and key findings reported in the article. Focus on the most significant outcomes presented by the authors."

Prompt: "Identify and elaborate on the primary strengths of this article. Consider aspects like originality, methodological rigor, clarity, significance of findings, or contribution to theory/practice."

Prompt: "Identify and discuss the major weaknesses or limitations of the study, as acknowledged by the authors or apparent from your reading. Consider scope, methodology, sample size, data analysis, or interpretation."

Prompt: "Assess the article's contribution to its specific field of study. Does it fill a gap in the literature, challenge existing theories, offer a novel perspective, or provide significant practical insights? Explain its originality and significance."

Prompt: "Evaluate the quality, sufficiency, and relevance of the evidence (data, examples, citations) used to support the main claims and arguments throughout the article. Are the conclusions well-supported?"

Prompt: "Identify any underlying assumptions (stated or unstated) made by the authors regarding their theoretical framework, methodology, data interpretation, or the context of their research. How might these assumptions affect the conclusions?"

Prompt: "Discuss the broader implications of the study's findings (theoretical, practical, policy-related). What directions for future research do the authors suggest, or can you infer based on the study's scope and limitations?"

Prompt: "Evaluate the overall clarity, organization, and structure of the article. Is the argument logical and easy to follow? Is the language precise? How effective is the use of headings, figures, and tables?"

این پرامپت برای افرادی طراحی شده که قصد دارند برای دوره دکتری اپلای کنند و به دنبال استاد راهنمایی هستند که زمینه پژوهشی‌اش با علایق آن‌ها هم‌راستا باشد. با استفاده از این درخواست، می‌توان فهرستی از اساتید فعال در یک حوزه خاص به دست آورد که شامل نام استاد، دانشگاه محل فعالیت، لینک‌های پروفایل تحقیقاتی (مثل Google Scholar یا ResearchGate)، و خلاصه‌ای از فعالیت‌های علمی آن‌ها است. همچنین این پرامپت می‌تواند راهنمایی‌هایی برای نحوه تماس مؤثر با اساتید جهت پیشنهاد همکاری یا گرفتن پذیرش ارائه دهد.

در واقع، این ابزار یک میان‌بُر هوشمندانه برای جست‌وجوی هدفمند استاد راهنماست که فرآیند پرزحمت پیدا کردن پژوهشگر مناسب را ساده، سریع و هدفمند می‌کند و شانس موفقیت در پذیرش را افزایش می‌دهد.

I am looking to apply for a phd program in [your field] and want to find a professor whose research aligns with my interests. My specific research interests include [your specific topics].
I need you to help me identify professors who are active in this area, preferably those who have published significant papers or are leading funded projects.
Please provide a list of professors, their universities, links to their research profiles (Google Scholar, ResearchGate, etc.), and a brief summary of their work. If possible, also suggest how I should approach contacting them for collaboration or supervision.

✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌نویسی
✅ 6 ساعت وبینار هوش‌مصنوعی در پژوهش
✅ کتابچه تحلیل داده با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

✅ 5 ساعت آموزش آشنایی با مبانی مدل‌های زبانی بزرگ
✅ 15 ساعت آموزش پرامپت‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش تصویرسازی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 5 ساعت آموزش برنامه‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌نویسی
✅ 6 ساعت وبینار هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه تحلیل داده با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ عضویت کانال منابع هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

آنالیز کلیدواژه‌های مهم و مرتبط به یک سوال پژوهشی، یکی از گام‌های اولیه و بنیادین در فرآیند پژوهش است. برای این کار، ابتدا چندین سوال پژوهشی مرتبط تدوین کرده و مفاهیم کلیدی آن‌ها را استخراج کنید. سپس با استفاده از این کلیدواژه‌های اولیه در پایگاه داده اسکوپوس جستجو نمایید. در مرحله بعد، با بهره‌گیری از قابلیت‌های تحلیلی و هوش مصنوعی اسکوپوس (مانند آنالیز نتایج، شناسایی روندهای موضوعی و کلیدواژه‌های نویسندگان/ایندکس)، لیست خود را پالایش، گسترش و بهینه کنید. این فرآیند تکرارشونده به شما کمک می‌کند تا مجموعه‌ای جامع و دقیق از کلیدواژه‌ها برای یک مرور ادبیات کامل و موثر به دست آورید.

Extract Seed Concepts for this question and create 3 questions for that in a concise way:{your first question}

☑ رتبه 7 ارشد علوم شناختی دانشگاه تهران
☑ همکاری در ده‌ها پژوهش داخلی و بین‌المللی

☑ رتبه 1 مسابقات سالانه هوش‌مصنوعی ایران IAAA
☑ رتبه 1 ارشد علوم شناختی دانشگاه تهران
☑ رتبه 13 مسابقات برنامه‌نویسی ACM غرب آسیا
☑ رتبه 2 مسابقات ملی تحلیل سیگنال مغزی NBML

✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌نویسی
✅ 6 ساعت وبینار هوش‌مصنوعی در پژوهش
✅ کتابچه تحلیل داده با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

برگزاری جلسات مشاوره آنلاین و حضوری جهت آموزش به کارگیری هوش‌مصنوعی در صنایع، کسب و کارها و مطالعات پژوهشی

1. Research Design: Is the research design appropriate for the research questions or hypothesis?

2. Sample Size: Is the sample size adequate to provide reliable and valid results?

3. Sampling Method: Was the sampling method appropriate and unbiased?

4. Data Collection: Were the data collection methods suitable for the research objectives?

5. Instrumentation: Were the instruments or tools used for data collection valid and reliable?

6. Data Analysis: Were the data analysis techniques appropriate for the type of data collected?

7. Control Variables: Were control variables identified and accounted for in the study?

8. Ethical Considerations: Were ethical guidelines followed in the research process?

9. Replication: Can the study be replicated by other researchers?

10. Limitations: Were the limitations of the study acknowledged and addressed?

11. Validity: Does the study have internal and external validity?

12. Reliability: Are the results consistent and reproducible?

13. Generalizability: Can the findings be generalized to a larger population?

Write Python code using numpy, pandas, statsmodels, matplotlib/seaborn.

Simulate longitudinal data (e.g., 100 subjects, 5 timepoints each) with within-subject correlation. Use a model like Response = Intercept + Time*Beta + SubjectEffect + Error, where SubjectEffect induces correlation. Define simulation parameters (e.g., Intercept=5, Beta=1.5, SubjectEffect_std=2, Error_std=1). Store in pandas DataFrame ('subject_id', 'time', 'predictor', 'response').

Perform GEE analysis (statsmodels) on this data. Use Gaussian family, Identity link, 'exchangeable' working correlation, and specify subject ID.

Visualize: Plot Response vs. Time, connecting points per subject.

Output: Print GEE model summary (including robust standard errors).

Goal: Demonstrate GEE on correlated data.

"Summarize the entire interview in one or two sentences, focusing on the central topic."

"What is the single most important message or point the interviewee is trying to convey?"

"Identify the most frequently discussed topics or recurring ideas throughout the interview. What common thread connects them?"

"What is the primary purpose or objective of this interview from the interviewee's perspective?"

"If an audience member could only remember one thing from this interview, what should it be? This often points to the main theme."

"Imagine you have to write a headline or title for this interview that captures its essence. What would it be?"

"Is there a central problem or question being addressed in the interview? If so, what is it, and what is the proposed solution or perspective?"

"Condense the interview into a 30-second 'elevator pitch.' What core idea would you highlight?"

"Analyze the beginning, middle, and end of the interview. How do these parts connect to form a cohesive central theme?"

"List the top 5-7 keywords or key phrases from the interview. How do these collectively point towards a main theme?"

➕ ChatGPT Plus (یکماهه ۱،۵۴۹)
➕ Perplexity Pro (شش ماهه ۲,۱۹۰)
➕ Gemini Advanced (پانزده ماهه ۳،۹۰۰)
➕ Super Grok (یکماهه ۱,۷۹۰)
➕ You.com Pro (دوازده ماهه ۳,۹۰۰)