
Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Patriotic Socialist Front — New Channel
The previous channel was banned on Telegram, not only from the app store. As a result, we will be transferring a significant amount of content to a new platform. This serves as the official feed of the PSF.
关联群组

Unofficial supporters of PSF
123
22.03.202502:10
Wignats gonna be big mad.
Im writing a new substack that will be published today. Explaining that Nazism. Is communism.
Topics will be the ideological foundations of fascism/nazism and similarities to communism.
Marxist ideological background of all the major nazi leaders. Including Hitlers service to the Bavarian Soviet Republic (hitler served in the government of the BVR in 1919)
"Beefsteak nazis" and competition with the KPD for voters and members.
The turn towards hostility against Bolshevism starting with the night of long knives and the purge of the nazi old guard.
How after the Purge, Röhm who was hated and feared by the German business elites and political elites, once he was out of the picture the Grrman capitalists and political elites welcomed Hitler into their ranks. Röhm had demanded a total liquidation of the old elite, seizing their assets. And eliminating the German Army to be replaced by the SA and a "peoples army" of extreme, highly motivated troops who he believed would embody the national ideals better then the Reichswehr. So the German conservatives demanded his death. In exchange they went along with Hitlers plans. But in the long run, they never mobilized all of Germanys resources until it was too late. And nazism like fascism became a vehicle for the protection of capitalism. The nazis even abandoned the 25 point plan of national Socialism.
Hitler had no intention of attacking the Soviets. Even offered the Soviets an alliance.
Post war. All the ww2 era nazis that survive become pro Soviet, including collaborators and fascists from partner regimes
US and Soviets get involved in proxy wars. USA uses the frankfurt school to neutralize western communists and make them adopt western outlooks when creates "cultural marxism/western marxism. US supports lib-left dissidents inside the warsaw pact. Soviets support far right neo fascist and 3P parties in the nato countries
Finally I will explain why ardent anti communism makes resistance to the liberal system useless. Left right unity is the only way to execute revolution
Im writing a new substack that will be published today. Explaining that Nazism. Is communism.
Topics will be the ideological foundations of fascism/nazism and similarities to communism.
Marxist ideological background of all the major nazi leaders. Including Hitlers service to the Bavarian Soviet Republic (hitler served in the government of the BVR in 1919)
"Beefsteak nazis" and competition with the KPD for voters and members.
The turn towards hostility against Bolshevism starting with the night of long knives and the purge of the nazi old guard.
How after the Purge, Röhm who was hated and feared by the German business elites and political elites, once he was out of the picture the Grrman capitalists and political elites welcomed Hitler into their ranks. Röhm had demanded a total liquidation of the old elite, seizing their assets. And eliminating the German Army to be replaced by the SA and a "peoples army" of extreme, highly motivated troops who he believed would embody the national ideals better then the Reichswehr. So the German conservatives demanded his death. In exchange they went along with Hitlers plans. But in the long run, they never mobilized all of Germanys resources until it was too late. And nazism like fascism became a vehicle for the protection of capitalism. The nazis even abandoned the 25 point plan of national Socialism.
Hitler had no intention of attacking the Soviets. Even offered the Soviets an alliance.
Post war. All the ww2 era nazis that survive become pro Soviet, including collaborators and fascists from partner regimes
US and Soviets get involved in proxy wars. USA uses the frankfurt school to neutralize western communists and make them adopt western outlooks when creates "cultural marxism/western marxism. US supports lib-left dissidents inside the warsaw pact. Soviets support far right neo fascist and 3P parties in the nato countries
Finally I will explain why ardent anti communism makes resistance to the liberal system useless. Left right unity is the only way to execute revolution
已删除29.03.202520:03


29.03.202514:39


07.04.202518:10
01.04.202513:36
🇯🇵Japan, 🇰🇷South Korea and 🇨🇳China vow to strengthen trade ties amid looming 🇺🇲U.S. tariffs
You know you messed up when your foreign policy forces 3 countries that hate each other to work together.
Critical support to Comrade Trump!
Japan, South Korea and China agreed on Sunday to continue trilateral economic and trade cooperation to address “emerging challenges,” a partnership that has become more crucial than ever as the U.S. trade war shatters the global order.
You know you messed up when your foreign policy forces 3 countries that hate each other to work together.
Critical support to Comrade Trump!
03.04.202520:46
Marx and engels: capitalism will kill off the individual cultures,nations and races
21.03.202513:54
https://youtu.be/C3L-Vtq4MS0
Orban and co have banned pride parades in Hungary
Orban and co have banned pride parades in Hungary


12.04.202516:34
🇯🇵⚔️🟥🛠Kōzaburō Tachibana: Prophet of Sacred Violence🛠🟥⚔️🇯🇵
Kōzaburō Tachibana was a Japanese political activist and ultra-nationalist . Tachibana believed that for the development of the Asian and Western societies, the village community was the original starting point of civilization and the only way for the country to prosper.
Tachibana called for the formation of a "patriotic brotherhood" to unselfishly lay down their lives to save the people in accordance to the emperor's wishes. Wanting to recruit form all social classes, the brotherhood would represent a more perfect whole, signified by the imperial will. He also argued that radical, violent change was needed to cleanse ‘the world of national politics...poisoned by mammon and the gang of corrupt industrialists’.
Kōzaburō Tachibana was a Japanese political activist and ultra-nationalist . Tachibana believed that for the development of the Asian and Western societies, the village community was the original starting point of civilization and the only way for the country to prosper.
Tachibana called for the formation of a "patriotic brotherhood" to unselfishly lay down their lives to save the people in accordance to the emperor's wishes. Wanting to recruit form all social classes, the brotherhood would represent a more perfect whole, signified by the imperial will. He also argued that radical, violent change was needed to cleanse ‘the world of national politics...poisoned by mammon and the gang of corrupt industrialists’.
07.04.202518:52
Chinese company owns the last virgin steel plant in Britain.
Their closing it and relocating to China
Its somehow trumps fault
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/27/british-steels-chinese-owners-reject-500m-go-green/
Their closing it and relocating to China
Its somehow trumps fault
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/27/british-steels-chinese-owners-reject-500m-go-green/
12.04.202515:08
So i read Evola’s "mithraic mysteries" and his essay on Emperor julian the Apostate, as well as the chapters in revolt against the modern world that deal with Julian and have some thoughts :
Julius Evola saw Julian the Apostate as a paradigmatic figure—not just historically, but spiritually and symbolically. In Evola's worldview, Julian was a solar warrior-king, a philosopher-emperor, and the embodiment of the heroic revolt against the modern world. He was one of the few in history who attempted to restore a sacred order grounded in Tradition after its degradation by egalitarianism and materialism, which for Evola began with Christianity.
Julian as a Restorer of Tradition
Evola placed Julian within his broader theory of "Tradition" (with a capital T), meaning the primordial metaphysical order that links man to the divine through hierarchy, ritual, and initiatic kingship. For Evola:
Julian represented a counter-current—the heroic effort to reassert the spiritual and hierarchical worldview of antiquity.
Ŵ
He saw Julian’s reign as an interruption of decay, a last flare of sacred kingship before the long twilight of modernity.
In Revolt Against the Modern World, Evola writes:
“Julian’s revolt was not merely religious, but metaphysical—it was a stand for the sacred solar authority of the ancient world against the spiritual leveling brought by Christianity.”
Julian is portrayed as the last representative of the Olympian spirit, which values hierarchy, virtue, heroic struggle, and initiation.
Evola admired Julian’s opposition to Christianity—not out of atheism, but because he believed Christianity:
Introduced a feminized, egalitarian, sentimental morality that undermined the warrior-ascetic ethos of Rome and Aryan antiquity.
Substituted divine kingship and initiatic knowledge with dogma and faith for the masses.
Disconnected man from the heroic ideal and made him weak, passive, inwardly broken.
Julian’s attempt to revive pagan cults, Neoplatonic philosophy, the worship of Mithras and Mithraic rites was seen as an effort to revitalize the inner fire of civilization.
Evola revered this as a spiritual insurrection—Julian was not just rejecting Christianity, but reclaiming the sacred masculine axis.
Julian embodied the solar archetype central to Evola’s conception of rulership:
He was a philosopher and initiate,warrior and Sovereign not a politician.
He aligned with the Sun God Helios/Sol/Mithras, the cosmic sovereign in Neoplatonic and Mithraic traditions.
In writing his Hymn to King Helios, Julian affirms the cosmic identity between the ruler and the divine sun, which Evola saw as the model of sacral sovereignty.
This matched Evola’s ideal of imperium—rule derived from spiritual authority, expressed through virile discipline, transcendence, and luminous clarity.
“The emperor should be the pontifex of the cosmos,” Evola echoes Julian’s vision—binding heaven and earth through action, ritual, and will.
Evola was not blind to Julian’s defeat—he saw it as inevitable given the tide of history—but not as a failure of vision:
Julian died in battle (possibly assassinated by Christians), and his restoration project collapsed soon after.
But to Evola, his heroism lay in the attempt—the warrior who stands against the age, like Arjuna on the battlefield, regardless of outcome.
Julian is framed as a symbol of the Right-Hand Path: active, solar, royal, and tragic—but inwardly, his spirit triumphant.
In Evola’s cyclical view of history (influenced by Hindu Yugas and Guénon), Julian appears at the tail end of the age of heroes, just before the Kali Yuga deepens. Thus:
Julian = the last beacon of the Solar-Aryan tradition before descent into the dark, materialist age.
Christianity = spiritual subversion, an inverted hierarchy.
Julian’s reign = a final rebellion of light, a doomed but noble attempt to reestablish the sacred axis.
Julius Evola saw Julian the Apostate as a paradigmatic figure—not just historically, but spiritually and symbolically. In Evola's worldview, Julian was a solar warrior-king, a philosopher-emperor, and the embodiment of the heroic revolt against the modern world. He was one of the few in history who attempted to restore a sacred order grounded in Tradition after its degradation by egalitarianism and materialism, which for Evola began with Christianity.
Julian as a Restorer of Tradition
Evola placed Julian within his broader theory of "Tradition" (with a capital T), meaning the primordial metaphysical order that links man to the divine through hierarchy, ritual, and initiatic kingship. For Evola:
Julian represented a counter-current—the heroic effort to reassert the spiritual and hierarchical worldview of antiquity.
Ŵ
He saw Julian’s reign as an interruption of decay, a last flare of sacred kingship before the long twilight of modernity.
In Revolt Against the Modern World, Evola writes:
“Julian’s revolt was not merely religious, but metaphysical—it was a stand for the sacred solar authority of the ancient world against the spiritual leveling brought by Christianity.”
Julian is portrayed as the last representative of the Olympian spirit, which values hierarchy, virtue, heroic struggle, and initiation.
Evola admired Julian’s opposition to Christianity—not out of atheism, but because he believed Christianity:
Introduced a feminized, egalitarian, sentimental morality that undermined the warrior-ascetic ethos of Rome and Aryan antiquity.
Substituted divine kingship and initiatic knowledge with dogma and faith for the masses.
Disconnected man from the heroic ideal and made him weak, passive, inwardly broken.
Julian’s attempt to revive pagan cults, Neoplatonic philosophy, the worship of Mithras and Mithraic rites was seen as an effort to revitalize the inner fire of civilization.
Evola revered this as a spiritual insurrection—Julian was not just rejecting Christianity, but reclaiming the sacred masculine axis.
Julian embodied the solar archetype central to Evola’s conception of rulership:
He was a philosopher and initiate,warrior and Sovereign not a politician.
He aligned with the Sun God Helios/Sol/Mithras, the cosmic sovereign in Neoplatonic and Mithraic traditions.
In writing his Hymn to King Helios, Julian affirms the cosmic identity between the ruler and the divine sun, which Evola saw as the model of sacral sovereignty.
This matched Evola’s ideal of imperium—rule derived from spiritual authority, expressed through virile discipline, transcendence, and luminous clarity.
“The emperor should be the pontifex of the cosmos,” Evola echoes Julian’s vision—binding heaven and earth through action, ritual, and will.
Evola was not blind to Julian’s defeat—he saw it as inevitable given the tide of history—but not as a failure of vision:
Julian died in battle (possibly assassinated by Christians), and his restoration project collapsed soon after.
But to Evola, his heroism lay in the attempt—the warrior who stands against the age, like Arjuna on the battlefield, regardless of outcome.
Julian is framed as a symbol of the Right-Hand Path: active, solar, royal, and tragic—but inwardly, his spirit triumphant.
In Evola’s cyclical view of history (influenced by Hindu Yugas and Guénon), Julian appears at the tail end of the age of heroes, just before the Kali Yuga deepens. Thus:
Julian = the last beacon of the Solar-Aryan tradition before descent into the dark, materialist age.
Christianity = spiritual subversion, an inverted hierarchy.
Julian’s reign = a final rebellion of light, a doomed but noble attempt to reestablish the sacred axis.
11.04.202514:08
A horrific development in Germany, at the same time that the AFD rises. "Muslim interaktiv".
A new, radical, "anti-colonial" mixture of wokeness and Islamic fundamentalism rallied in Hamburg in the previous few days, calling for a Caliphate in Europe, and attempting to organize Muslims in Europe and appears to be growing rapidly.
The German people seem to have noticed that the woke government and semi-woke conservatives have no response, and calls to ban this organization, which appears to have direct ties to the last 3 high profile terror attacks in Germany, were met with statements by the left wing government that a "caliphate" is NOT an illegal or undemocratic form of government and cannot be banned.
https://www.dw.com/en/protests-in-hamburg-what-is-muslim-interactive/a-69049945
A new, radical, "anti-colonial" mixture of wokeness and Islamic fundamentalism rallied in Hamburg in the previous few days, calling for a Caliphate in Europe, and attempting to organize Muslims in Europe and appears to be growing rapidly.
The German people seem to have noticed that the woke government and semi-woke conservatives have no response, and calls to ban this organization, which appears to have direct ties to the last 3 high profile terror attacks in Germany, were met with statements by the left wing government that a "caliphate" is NOT an illegal or undemocratic form of government and cannot be banned.
https://www.dw.com/en/protests-in-hamburg-what-is-muslim-interactive/a-69049945
02.04.202503:29
Accidentally may have proven God exists demonstrably in a physics debate today
05.04.202523:41
RUSSIA HAS MUSLIMS
( Based Right wing Poland issues more visas to the middle east and Africa then every other country in the entire EU including 100,000 more then Germany the number 2 destination country for African and Middle eastern immigrants. in fact most of Polands visas are for profit, "first residence permits" so once they enter through Poland, and pay the few hundred euros to the poles, they are free to go to Sweden or Germany, with a legal EU residency permit )
https://notesfrompoland.com/2024/10/17/a-stormy-start-to-a-much-needed-debate-on-migration-in-poland-opinion/#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20Poland%20issued%20642%2C789,the%20last%20seven%20years%20running.
( Based Right wing Poland issues more visas to the middle east and Africa then every other country in the entire EU including 100,000 more then Germany the number 2 destination country for African and Middle eastern immigrants. in fact most of Polands visas are for profit, "first residence permits" so once they enter through Poland, and pay the few hundred euros to the poles, they are free to go to Sweden or Germany, with a legal EU residency permit )
https://notesfrompoland.com/2024/10/17/a-stormy-start-to-a-much-needed-debate-on-migration-in-poland-opinion/#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20Poland%20issued%20642%2C789,the%20last%20seven%20years%20running.


23.03.202514:22
Lev Gumilev's theory of eurasianism
Lev Gumilev was a Soviet anthropologist, historian and Orthodox Christian who was known for his theories of ethnogenesis. His Eurasianism framed Russia as a civilizational bridge, neither fully Eastern nor Western, with a historical mission to unify the Eurasian space. Eurasia was seen as a living organism formed by a synthesis of ecological, biological, and historical factors. Gumilev was particularly critical of groups he deemed "anti-systemic," like the medieval Khazars and Jews, accusing them of parasitizing stronger ethnoses rather than contributing to the superethnos. His theories on Eurasianism are also considered to be a component of Putin's ideology,
—Gumilev, Ancient Rus and the Great Steppe, 1989
Lev Gumilev was a Soviet anthropologist, historian and Orthodox Christian who was known for his theories of ethnogenesis. His Eurasianism framed Russia as a civilizational bridge, neither fully Eastern nor Western, with a historical mission to unify the Eurasian space. Eurasia was seen as a living organism formed by a synthesis of ecological, biological, and historical factors. Gumilev was particularly critical of groups he deemed "anti-systemic," like the medieval Khazars and Jews, accusing them of parasitizing stronger ethnoses rather than contributing to the superethnos. His theories on Eurasianism are also considered to be a component of Putin's ideology,
"The Radhanites, being Jews, did not fight themselves, but used hired soldiers or simply betrayed those who trusted them, profiting from the troubles of others. This was their system: to live at the expense of others, without creating anything of their own."
—Gumilev, Ancient Rus and the Great Steppe, 1989
12.04.202515:08
To Evola, Julian was not just an emperor—he was a living mystery, the sacred sovereign of rebellion against the age—and his brief reign was like a ritual gesture, a cosmic echo that still speaks to those who walk the path of revolt against the modern world.
登录以解锁更多功能。