옥수수 🌽
𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐲
🕊 ᴛᴡɪᴛᴛᴇʀ:
https://x.com/bosupolitics?s=21&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
@bosupolitics
🥥 ᴋᴀᴋᴀᴏ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ ᴄʜᴀᴛ:
https://open.kakao.com/o/g1JkJKpf
🕊 ᴛᴡɪᴛᴛᴇʀ:
https://x.com/bosupolitics?s=21&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
@bosupolitics
🥥 ᴋᴀᴋᴀᴏ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ ᴄʜᴀᴛ:
https://open.kakao.com/o/g1JkJKpf
"옥수수 🌽" 群组最新帖子
19.04.202515:05
Happy Easter
19.04.202511:30
19.04.202510:15
I am pro-deep state by the way
19.04.202508:58
Lee Jae Myung dominates the Democratic presidential primary in the 충청 (Chung-Cheong) region by winning 88% of the vote, clearing everyone by miles.
19.04.202503:22
You frequently observe how the “race realist” dissident right and pro-Chinese propaganda (Wumao) accounts incessantly recycle this image to prove how liberalism is inferior to authoritarianism.
All governments are essentially authoritarian because they have monopoly on “legitimate” violence. It really is futile to make a specific distinction for “authoritarianism.” Even if governments exist to protect the natural rights of people based on their consent, which is a Lockeian liberal definition of what governments essentially are, the existence of consent or general will doesn’t negate the “authoritarian” nature of governments or states. As Hobbes would argue, people would rather be ruled under authority to prevent incessant chaos from crippling their chances of survival or material wealth.
Also, smoking in front of your farm products is 3rd world peasant behavior. In despite of the message the picture above intended to convey, liberalism clearly just mogs authoritarianism in this image.
All governments are essentially authoritarian because they have monopoly on “legitimate” violence. It really is futile to make a specific distinction for “authoritarianism.” Even if governments exist to protect the natural rights of people based on their consent, which is a Lockeian liberal definition of what governments essentially are, the existence of consent or general will doesn’t negate the “authoritarian” nature of governments or states. As Hobbes would argue, people would rather be ruled under authority to prevent incessant chaos from crippling their chances of survival or material wealth.
Also, smoking in front of your farm products is 3rd world peasant behavior. In despite of the message the picture above intended to convey, liberalism clearly just mogs authoritarianism in this image.
18.04.202516:10
Kissinger is a figure that BAPtard wignats should admire if anything else. Kissinger understood that Nations aren’t saints, but predators in a jungle. His foreign policy craftsmanship was essentially about “Darwinian” survival, not ethics. Prioritizing amicable outcomes over moralfagging deontological duties is far more ideologically compatible with a pragmatic Darwinian view of competition, but essentially these retards are just no different from those “swarthy 3rd world browns” when it comes to glorifying losers.
18.04.202516:00
18.04.202508:02
2028 National GOP Primary (If Donald Trump Is Running For a 3rd Term)
🔴 Trump: 56% (+37)
🔴 Vance: 19%
🔴 DeSantis: 4%
🔴 Haley: 3%
🔴 Ramaswamy: 3%
🔴 Rubio: 2%
🔴 Gabbard: 2%
Yale | April 1-3 | 1,435 RV
Reference: https://x.com/opensourcezone/status/1912252930075553804?s=46&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
🔴 Trump: 56% (+37)
🔴 Vance: 19%
🔴 DeSantis: 4%
🔴 Haley: 3%
🔴 Ramaswamy: 3%
🔴 Rubio: 2%
🔴 Gabbard: 2%
Yale | April 1-3 | 1,435 RV
Reference: https://x.com/opensourcezone/status/1912252930075553804?s=46&t=9XG89jWpyT2BfJy3Y5QxTA
17.04.202519:20
𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚊’𝚜 𝙵𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚐𝚗 𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 (𝚂𝚅𝚁) 𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚄𝚂-𝚁𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝 𝙴𝚄
17.04.202516:06
🤲
转发自:
옥수수 🌽
17.04.202502:44
𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐊 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐀 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐄𝐑
The Tonghak movement, established in 1860 by Choe Che U, blended Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, folk beliefs, and elements of Catholicism. It promoted equality and addressed societal anxieties amid Western encroachment. Although Tonghak didn’t outright oppose the Chosun dynasty, its challenge to the established social order alarmed the government, leading to Choe’s arrest and execution in 1864. Despite suppression, the movement endured, spreading across southern Korea in the 1880s and gaining strength. By the 1890s, its followers began advocating for Choe’s rehabilitation, while growing rural unrest over local corruption and misrule set the stage for a peasant uprising.
In March 1894, about 4,000 armed peasants in Jeolla Province gathered to release a "Manifesto," marking the beginning of the Tonghak Peasant Uprising. The document outlined their grievances and goals, drawing heavily on Confucian values. However, its focus on traditional ideals rather than modern or anti-foreign perspectives has led many scholars to overlook it, often highlighting the uprising’s links to modernization or nationalism instead. Yet, the "Manifesto" is central to understanding the motivations of the peasants and their worldview.
The "Manifesto" begins with a Confucian principle: humanity’s unique moral capacity makes people the most valuable beings in the world. This familiar phrasing was likely intended to resonate with both educated elites and ordinary people. It emphasized loyalty to the king and duty to family, portraying the peasants as loyal subjects seeking to save the nation. The king himself was not criticized but described as a potentially virtuous ruler, hindered by corrupt officials whose greed and abuse had plunged the country into crisis.
The peasants saw themselves as humble yet determined actors stepping in to restore order and justice where the ruling class had failed. They framed their struggle as an effort to revive injŏng (仁政, sincerity, human-heartedness) benevolent governance, and to protect the people, whom they described as the foundation of the nation. While recognizing their modest position in society, they asserted their moral duty to lead the way in restoring peace and harmony. The "Manifesto" concluded with a hopeful vision of a new era of prosperity under the king’s virtuous leadership.
Ultimately, the "Manifesto" reflects the peasant army’s deeply rooted Confucian ideals, blending loyalty to tradition with a bold assertion of responsibility for their country’s future. Through their actions and words, the Tonghak peasants sought to bridge the gap between a crumbling social order and their vision of a just and harmonious society.
The Tonghak movement, established in 1860 by Choe Che U, blended Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, folk beliefs, and elements of Catholicism. It promoted equality and addressed societal anxieties amid Western encroachment. Although Tonghak didn’t outright oppose the Chosun dynasty, its challenge to the established social order alarmed the government, leading to Choe’s arrest and execution in 1864. Despite suppression, the movement endured, spreading across southern Korea in the 1880s and gaining strength. By the 1890s, its followers began advocating for Choe’s rehabilitation, while growing rural unrest over local corruption and misrule set the stage for a peasant uprising.
In March 1894, about 4,000 armed peasants in Jeolla Province gathered to release a "Manifesto," marking the beginning of the Tonghak Peasant Uprising. The document outlined their grievances and goals, drawing heavily on Confucian values. However, its focus on traditional ideals rather than modern or anti-foreign perspectives has led many scholars to overlook it, often highlighting the uprising’s links to modernization or nationalism instead. Yet, the "Manifesto" is central to understanding the motivations of the peasants and their worldview.
The "Manifesto" begins with a Confucian principle: humanity’s unique moral capacity makes people the most valuable beings in the world. This familiar phrasing was likely intended to resonate with both educated elites and ordinary people. It emphasized loyalty to the king and duty to family, portraying the peasants as loyal subjects seeking to save the nation. The king himself was not criticized but described as a potentially virtuous ruler, hindered by corrupt officials whose greed and abuse had plunged the country into crisis.
The peasants saw themselves as humble yet determined actors stepping in to restore order and justice where the ruling class had failed. They framed their struggle as an effort to revive injŏng (仁政, sincerity, human-heartedness) benevolent governance, and to protect the people, whom they described as the foundation of the nation. While recognizing their modest position in society, they asserted their moral duty to lead the way in restoring peace and harmony. The "Manifesto" concluded with a hopeful vision of a new era of prosperity under the king’s virtuous leadership.
Ultimately, the "Manifesto" reflects the peasant army’s deeply rooted Confucian ideals, blending loyalty to tradition with a bold assertion of responsibility for their country’s future. Through their actions and words, the Tonghak peasants sought to bridge the gap between a crumbling social order and their vision of a just and harmonious society.
转发自:옥수수 🌽
17.04.202502:44
𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐊 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐘 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐀 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐄𝐑
记录
19.04.202523:59
1.6K订阅者16.03.202500:15
100引用指数19.04.202506:56
629每帖平均覆盖率12.09.202423:59
465广告帖子的平均覆盖率22.02.202523:59
233.33%ER11.04.202523:59
38.85%ERR转发自:옥수수 🌽
07.04.202516:45
𝙳𝙿𝚁𝙺 / 𝙽𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙹𝚎𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚀𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗
🇰🇵🇰🇵✡️✡️
"Jews Who Hold Power In The United States”
During the summer of 1996, the United States House Subcommittee, comprised of 22 members, introduced the "Iran Sanctions Act," which enforced sanctions by the US government on companies worldwide engaged in trade with Iran. Despite facing widespread criticism for its strict measures, the bill passed smoothly, with the support of AIPAC, an organization representing Jews, rather than from either the Republicans or Democrats. Although Jews constitute a small portion of the US population, their influence in American society is significant, largely shaping US support for Zionism due to their considerable sway in American politics, the economy, and the alignment of Zionist arguments with US policies in the Middle East. AIPAC, supported by significant Jewish donations, categorizes US Congress members each year as either "pro-Israel" or "anti-Israel," offering substantial political funding and advancement opportunities to those aligned with Israel while rallying Jewish individuals across different sectors like politics, finance, media, and law to target and discredit anti-Israel lawmakers.
Following the assassination of an Israeli Prime Minister, numerous prominent US politicians, including then-President Clinton, attended the funeral, largely influenced by AIPAC Despite being a minority within the 284 million US population, Jews hold substantial sway across multiple sectors. A notable portion of current lawmakers in both the US Congress and state legislatures are Jewish, and they also occupy influential roles within the White House and leadership of the main political parties.
In the realm of finance, Jews are prominent, with a dominant presence in institutions like the New York Stock Exchange, banks, and insurance companies. Major financial entities such as JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Charles Schwab are predominantly family-owned by Jews. Additionally, Jews hold significant positions in various other industries like tobacco, entertainment, record labels, precious metals, real estate, and textiles. Reports from Western sources reveal that among the top 40 wealthiest individuals in the United States, 16 are Jewish, highlighting their considerable influence in the country's financial landscape. Jews contribute a significant portion of their substantial wealth, amassed through robust economic endeavors, to organizations and lobbying groups that advocate for the interests of Jews in Israel. Their impact in the media sector is noteworthy, with influential outlets like The New York Times, owned by Jews since the 1930s, often promoting a biased narrative portraying Israel favorably and Arabs very negatively. Many major US media organizations, including The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, and the AP wire service, are also under Jewish control. Moreover, key programs on major broadcasting networks like ABC Radio, NBC, CNN TV, and FOX TV, which has gained popularity since the 1980s, are overseen by Jews. The extent of Jewish ownership in the U.S. media market is significant, although the exact magnitude is uncertain.
Additionally, Jews hold prominent positions as chancellors in four out of five major universities in the United States. They regularly convene national gatherings in Washington and New York, underscoring their organizational unity and influence. An article in the South Korean magazine "말" (May 2006 issue) suggested that while Anglo-Saxon individuals of British descent hold significant political sway in the United States, internally, the nation is often perceived as a 'Jewish Republic.' Furthermore, many of the world's top arms and food corporations are reportedly Jewish-owned, and the core of the neoconservative movement, which supported the theory of invading Iraq, is also said to be predominantly Jewish.
🇰🇵🇰🇵✡️✡️
"Jews Who Hold Power In The United States”
During the summer of 1996, the United States House Subcommittee, comprised of 22 members, introduced the "Iran Sanctions Act," which enforced sanctions by the US government on companies worldwide engaged in trade with Iran. Despite facing widespread criticism for its strict measures, the bill passed smoothly, with the support of AIPAC, an organization representing Jews, rather than from either the Republicans or Democrats. Although Jews constitute a small portion of the US population, their influence in American society is significant, largely shaping US support for Zionism due to their considerable sway in American politics, the economy, and the alignment of Zionist arguments with US policies in the Middle East. AIPAC, supported by significant Jewish donations, categorizes US Congress members each year as either "pro-Israel" or "anti-Israel," offering substantial political funding and advancement opportunities to those aligned with Israel while rallying Jewish individuals across different sectors like politics, finance, media, and law to target and discredit anti-Israel lawmakers.
Following the assassination of an Israeli Prime Minister, numerous prominent US politicians, including then-President Clinton, attended the funeral, largely influenced by AIPAC Despite being a minority within the 284 million US population, Jews hold substantial sway across multiple sectors. A notable portion of current lawmakers in both the US Congress and state legislatures are Jewish, and they also occupy influential roles within the White House and leadership of the main political parties.
In the realm of finance, Jews are prominent, with a dominant presence in institutions like the New York Stock Exchange, banks, and insurance companies. Major financial entities such as JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Charles Schwab are predominantly family-owned by Jews. Additionally, Jews hold significant positions in various other industries like tobacco, entertainment, record labels, precious metals, real estate, and textiles. Reports from Western sources reveal that among the top 40 wealthiest individuals in the United States, 16 are Jewish, highlighting their considerable influence in the country's financial landscape. Jews contribute a significant portion of their substantial wealth, amassed through robust economic endeavors, to organizations and lobbying groups that advocate for the interests of Jews in Israel. Their impact in the media sector is noteworthy, with influential outlets like The New York Times, owned by Jews since the 1930s, often promoting a biased narrative portraying Israel favorably and Arabs very negatively. Many major US media organizations, including The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, and the AP wire service, are also under Jewish control. Moreover, key programs on major broadcasting networks like ABC Radio, NBC, CNN TV, and FOX TV, which has gained popularity since the 1980s, are overseen by Jews. The extent of Jewish ownership in the U.S. media market is significant, although the exact magnitude is uncertain.
Additionally, Jews hold prominent positions as chancellors in four out of five major universities in the United States. They regularly convene national gatherings in Washington and New York, underscoring their organizational unity and influence. An article in the South Korean magazine "말" (May 2006 issue) suggested that while Anglo-Saxon individuals of British descent hold significant political sway in the United States, internally, the nation is often perceived as a 'Jewish Republic.' Furthermore, many of the world's top arms and food corporations are reportedly Jewish-owned, and the core of the neoconservative movement, which supported the theory of invading Iraq, is also said to be predominantly Jewish.
转发自:옥수수 🌽
10.04.202515:55
"𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘏𝘪𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘑𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘦𝘯."
- 𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚄𝚕𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚟𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝙳𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝟷𝟿𝟹𝟾-𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟺 (𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟾), 𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝟸𝟸𝟷 -
Germany and Japan signed a secret agreement in January 1942 to divide the Eastern Hemisphere, although no serious military collaboration occurred. The logistical hurdles of coordinating operations in the Indian Ocean would have been enormous for both countries, but what truly hampered their collaboration was Hitler's loathing of the Japanese. According to a diary entry written by German envoy von Hassell in March 1942, Hitler was not pleased with Japan's success in Singapore which was done at the expense of European colonial forces. In fact, he reportedly stated that he would have gladly dispatched British forces of twenty divisions to assist in pushing back the Japanese, whom he referred to as the "yellow men." Alfred Rosenberg also similarly addresses in his most famous work, "The Myth of the 20th Century," the mass influx of Japanese people in California being a threat/Yellow Peril.
- 𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚄𝚕𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚟𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝙳𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝟷𝟿𝟹𝟾-𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟺 (𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟾), 𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝟸𝟸𝟷 -
Germany and Japan signed a secret agreement in January 1942 to divide the Eastern Hemisphere, although no serious military collaboration occurred. The logistical hurdles of coordinating operations in the Indian Ocean would have been enormous for both countries, but what truly hampered their collaboration was Hitler's loathing of the Japanese. According to a diary entry written by German envoy von Hassell in March 1942, Hitler was not pleased with Japan's success in Singapore which was done at the expense of European colonial forces. In fact, he reportedly stated that he would have gladly dispatched British forces of twenty divisions to assist in pushing back the Japanese, whom he referred to as the "yellow men." Alfred Rosenberg also similarly addresses in his most famous work, "The Myth of the 20th Century," the mass influx of Japanese people in California being a threat/Yellow Peril.
12.04.202515:20
So no tariffs on chips, computers, and phones
What does America intend to re-shore then? Socks and Coffee Beans?
What does America intend to re-shore then? Socks and Coffee Beans?
转发自:옥수수 🌽
20.03.202519:00
"𝘐 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘮 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘮 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘶𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘴."
"𝘐 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘫𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯."
- 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 -
Sir Francis Galton, who is recognized for having initiated the eugenics movement in the late 1800s, served as an inspiration for Davenport. Galton, a relative of the renowned biologist Charles Darwin, proposed the idea that evolution may be manipulated by autonomous human actions
"𝘐 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘫𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯."
- 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 -
Sir Francis Galton, who is recognized for having initiated the eugenics movement in the late 1800s, served as an inspiration for Davenport. Galton, a relative of the renowned biologist Charles Darwin, proposed the idea that evolution may be manipulated by autonomous human actions
转发自:옥수수 🌽
29.03.202504:00
On June 18 1940, Stalin’s USSR Officially Congratulated Hitler’s Germany for Successfully Conquering France
转发自:옥수수 🌽
25.03.202502:34
Human rights, and by extension indigenous rights, have no inherent existence beyond the realm of human imagination. They are constructs, neither embedded in the cosmic order nor grounded in the natural world. These rights exist solely because we conceptualize, define, and collectively accept them. Far from being timeless truths, they are creations of the human mind, crafted to impose structure and meaning on a universe that is fundamentally indifferent to our moral frameworks. Nature itself doesn't care about morality or justice. It is controlled by unbiased forces that are indifferent to human concepts of justice or right and wrong such as cause and effect & growth and decay. Therefore, indigenous rights, like all rights, are a reflection of our underlying yearning to bring order and meaning to a life that by definition provides none. They are based on human cognition rather than the structure of reality, and they are instruments of interpretation rather than absolute laws.
登录以解锁更多功能。
