Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions
23.04.202510:45
Happy Wednesday Everyone!
The justices will convene to hear one case for oral argument this morning:
1). Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (24-7)
For those who wish to listen to the arguments, here is a link to listen live at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices will convene to hear one case for oral argument this morning:
1). Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (24-7)
For those who wish to listen to the arguments, here is a link to listen live at 10amET: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
21.04.202513:38
NEW: Supreme Court adds a new case to its 2025–2026 term, which addresses Postal Service delivery issues, specifically whether it the claim ‘arises out of “the loss” or “miscarriage” of letters or postal matters.’
19.04.202505:30
JUST IN: Supreme Court BLOCKS (for now) the Trump administration from deporting foreign nationals under the “Alien Enemies Act”.
14.04.202518:45
JUST IN: Supreme Court will release one or more opinions in argued cases on Thursday April 17 at 10amET.
02.04.202514:15
NEW: Here is the second and final opinion of the day from the Supreme Court.
Authored by: Justice Alito
Joined by: Unanimous Decision
Holding: The FDA’s treatment of device type did not violate the change-in-position doctrine. The FDA’s 2020 guidance did not establish a “safe harbor” for non-cartridge-based products. Case is reversed and remanded back to the Fifth Court of Appeals for further proceedings.
Dissent: N/A
Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1038_2d93.pdf
Authored by: Justice Alito
Joined by: Unanimous Decision
Holding: The FDA’s treatment of device type did not violate the change-in-position doctrine. The FDA’s 2020 guidance did not establish a “safe harbor” for non-cartridge-based products. Case is reversed and remanded back to the Fifth Court of Appeals for further proceedings.
Dissent: N/A
Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1038_2d93.pdf
28.03.202517:48
JUST IN: Supreme Court will release one or more opinions in argued cases on Wednesday April 2, at 10amET.
22.04.202514:06
That is the only opinion of the day from the Supreme Court.
21.04.202510:01
Good Morning Everyone!
Today the justices will convene for their April argument session, beginning at 10amET.
The justices will start their day at 9:30amET by releasing an order list from last Thursday’s private conference. The justices will then convene at 10amET to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Kennedy, Sec. of H&HS v. Braidwood Mgmt., Inc. (24-316)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-316/326373/20240919152821295_Becerra%20v%20Braidwood%20-%20Cert_Pet.pdf
2). Parrish v. United States (24-275)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-275/325496/20240909143556404_Parrish%20Cert%20Petition.pdf
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live to them as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the justices will convene for their April argument session, beginning at 10amET.
The justices will start their day at 9:30amET by releasing an order list from last Thursday’s private conference. The justices will then convene at 10amET to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Kennedy, Sec. of H&HS v. Braidwood Mgmt., Inc. (24-316)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-316/326373/20240919152821295_Becerra%20v%20Braidwood%20-%20Cert_Pet.pdf
2). Parrish v. United States (24-275)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-275/325496/20240909143556404_Parrish%20Cert%20Petition.pdf
Arguments begin at 10amET, here is a link to listen live to them as they occur: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
17.04.202518:10
BREAKING: Supreme Court will take up the case involving the Trump administration’s appeal to allow the end to birthright citizenship. The case is set for oral argument on May 15.
10.04.202522:47
JUST IN: Supreme Court issues order requiring the Government to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported due in part to an administrative error. Justice Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson issued a statement on the matter.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf
02.04.202514:05
NEW: Here is the first opinion of the day from the Supreme Court.
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Jackson.
- Holding: Under civil RICO, §1964(c), a plaintiff may seek treble damages for business or property loss even if the loss resulted from a personal injury.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-365_6k47.pdf
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Jackson.
- Holding: Under civil RICO, §1964(c), a plaintiff may seek treble damages for business or property loss even if the loss resulted from a personal injury.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-365_6k47.pdf
26.03.202514:12
NEW: Here is the second and final opinion of the day from the Supreme Court.
- Justice Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson. Justice Thomas and Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
- Bondi V. Vanderstock
- Justice Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson. Justice Thomas and Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
- Bondi V. Vanderstock
22.04.202514:05
- Case: Monsalvo Velazquez v. Bondi
- Authored by: Justice Gorsuch
- Joined by:Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.
- Holding: "This Court has jurisdiction to review Monsalvo’s petition. Under §1252, courts may review “final order[s] of removal” and “all questions of law” arising from them. Monsalvo’s petition sought judicial review of a legal question about the meaning of a term in his final removal order—specifically, the meaning of “60 days” for voluntary departure. Although Monsalvo did not challenge his removability, nothing in §1252 requires an individual to press a challenge to one term in a final order of removal just to secure judicial review of another. This Court rejects the government’s argument that a petition must include a challenge to removability to secure judicial review. Such an interpretation would force litigants to assert meritless claims simply to obtain jurisdiction.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined, and in which Kavanaugh and Barrett joined as to Parts I and II. Justice Alito and Barrett filed dissenting opinions, in which Justice Kavanaugh joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-929_h3ci.pdf
- Authored by: Justice Gorsuch
- Joined by:Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.
- Holding: "This Court has jurisdiction to review Monsalvo’s petition. Under §1252, courts may review “final order[s] of removal” and “all questions of law” arising from them. Monsalvo’s petition sought judicial review of a legal question about the meaning of a term in his final removal order—specifically, the meaning of “60 days” for voluntary departure. Although Monsalvo did not challenge his removability, nothing in §1252 requires an individual to press a challenge to one term in a final order of removal just to secure judicial review of another. This Court rejects the government’s argument that a petition must include a challenge to removability to secure judicial review. Such an interpretation would force litigants to assert meritless claims simply to obtain jurisdiction.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined, and in which Kavanaugh and Barrett joined as to Parts I and II. Justice Alito and Barrett filed dissenting opinions, in which Justice Kavanaugh joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-929_h3ci.pdf
20.04.202504:25
JUST IN: Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas has issued his dissent towards the order from the Supreme Court last night against the Trump administration’s plans to deport detainees under the Alien Enemies Act.
Here is a link to his dissent: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_22p3.pdf
Here is a link to his dissent: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_22p3.pdf
17.04.202517:56
JUST IN: Supreme Court will release one or more opinions in argued cases on Tuesday April 22 at 10amET.
07.04.202523:16
BREAKING: In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court allows the President Trump administration to continue deporting illegal immigrants they deem a member of the Venezuela Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act. Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett and Jackson dissented.
Here is a link to the per curiam: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a931_2c83.pdf
Here is a link to the per curiam: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a931_2c83.pdf
02.04.202510:10
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
This morning we begin at 10amET with the justices releasing one OR more opinions in argued cases so far this term.
Following the announcement of opinion(s), the justices will convene to hear one case for oral argument:
1.) Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
Questions Presented are as follows:
1). Whether the Medicaid Act’s any-qualified- provider provision unambiguously confers a private
right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider.
2). What is the scope of a Medicaid beneficiary’s alleged right to choose a provider that a state has deemed disqualified
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
This morning we begin at 10amET with the justices releasing one OR more opinions in argued cases so far this term.
Following the announcement of opinion(s), the justices will convene to hear one case for oral argument:
1.) Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
Questions Presented are as follows:
1). Whether the Medicaid Act’s any-qualified- provider provision unambiguously confers a private
right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider.
2). What is the scope of a Medicaid beneficiary’s alleged right to choose a provider that a state has deemed disqualified
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
26.03.202514:04
NEW: Here is the first opinion of the day from the Supreme Court.
- Justice Jackson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.
- United States v. Miller
- Justice Jackson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.
- United States v. Miller
22.04.202510:25
Good Tuesday Morning Everyone!
The justices will start their day this morning at 10 AM ET to hand down one or more opinions in argued cases so far this term.
Following the handing down of opinion(s), the justices will convene to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Mahmoud v. Taylor (24-297)
2). CIR v. Zuch (24-416)
The first case is one of many controversial cases being heard this term. It dives into the “parent’s rights” movement, and their ability, based on religious beliefs, to control what their student can learn in school, specifically as it relates to gender and sexuality.
Arguments for the first case, begins as soon as announcements wrap up: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices will start their day this morning at 10 AM ET to hand down one or more opinions in argued cases so far this term.
Following the handing down of opinion(s), the justices will convene to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Mahmoud v. Taylor (24-297)
2). CIR v. Zuch (24-416)
The first case is one of many controversial cases being heard this term. It dives into the “parent’s rights” movement, and their ability, based on religious beliefs, to control what their student can learn in school, specifically as it relates to gender and sexuality.
Arguments for the first case, begins as soon as announcements wrap up: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
19.04.202522:18
NEW: Trump administration has officially responded to the application for stay brought by foreign detainees against being deported under the Alien Enemies Act. The Supreme Court late last night issued what appears to be a full-court administrative stay (a temporary pause that doesn’t reflect how the court may rule on the application itself) on the Trump administration from carrying out the deportations. We will likely hear from the Supreme Court next week on what will happen next in the case.
Here is a link to the response from President Trump’s administration: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A1007/356072/20250419170105032_A.A.R.P.%20Opp.%20FINAL.pdf
Here is a link to the response from President Trump’s administration: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A1007/356072/20250419170105032_A.A.R.P.%20Opp.%20FINAL.pdf
17.04.202514:05
Here is the first and only opinion of the day from the Supreme Court:
Authored by: Justice Sotomayor
Joined by: Unanimous Court.
Holding: To state a claim under §1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential §1108 exemptions.
Dissent: N/A
Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1007_h3ci.pdf
Authored by: Justice Sotomayor
Joined by: Unanimous Court.
Holding: To state a claim under §1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential §1108 exemptions.
Dissent: N/A
Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1007_h3ci.pdf
04.04.202520:41
BREAKING: The Supreme Court allows the Trump administration to halt millions of dollars worth of teacher grant money used for training over DEI initiatives. The Supreme Court issued a stay on a lower court order that required the Trump administration to reinstate the funds.
• Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson publicly dissented.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a910_f2bh.pdf
• Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson publicly dissented.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a910_f2bh.pdf
31.03.202510:02
Good Monday Morning Everyone!
The day begins with an order list released from the Supreme Court at 9:30amET.
Beginning at 10amET, the justices will take the bench to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Catholic Charities Bureau v. WI Labor Review Comm'n
2). Rivers v. Guerrero
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments as soon as they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The day begins with an order list released from the Supreme Court at 9:30amET.
Beginning at 10amET, the justices will take the bench to hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Catholic Charities Bureau v. WI Labor Review Comm'n
2). Rivers v. Guerrero
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments as soon as they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
26.03.202510:05
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone!
Today the justices will begin their sitting by releasing one or more opinions in argued cases starting at 10amET.
Following the announcement of opinion(s), the justices will hear two cases consolidated for oral arguments.
1). > FCC v. Consumers' Research
> SHLB Coalition v. Consumers' Research
(Consolidated)
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments after opinion announcements: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Today the justices will begin their sitting by releasing one or more opinions in argued cases starting at 10amET.
Following the announcement of opinion(s), the justices will hear two cases consolidated for oral arguments.
1). > FCC v. Consumers' Research
> SHLB Coalition v. Consumers' Research
(Consolidated)
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments after opinion announcements: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
Ko'rsatilgan 1 - 24 dan 134
Ko'proq funksiyalarni ochish uchun tizimga kiring.