Matt Walsh
Fed up with the talking heads? Matt gives you a no-holds-barred take on today’s cultural, religious, and political issues.
TGlist reytingi
0
0
TuriOmmaviy
Tekshirish
TekshirilmaganIshonchnoma
ShubhaliJoylashuv
TilBoshqa
Kanal yaratilgan sanaСіч 31, 2023
TGlist-ga qo'shildi
Лют 05, 2025Rekordlar
05.02.202523:59
365Obunachilar29.01.202523:59
0Iqtiboslar indeksi09.03.202523:59
55Bitta post qamrovi09.03.202523:59
72Reklama posti qamrovi07.02.202523:59
11.11%ER07.02.202523:59
17.63%ERR
Repost qilingan:
Jimmy Dore Show
09.04.202502:24
RFK JR. UNLEASHES OPERATION STORK SPEED: A Game-Changer for Baby Formula! Contaminants? Heavy metals? Junk ingredients? GONE. This move slams the FDA into action—safe, pure nutrition for America’s infants is HERE!
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1909659599382495246
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1909659599382495246
Repost qilingan:Jimmy Dore Show
09.04.202502:20
NYC’S BIZARRE NUCLEAR PSA EXPOSED: Survive the Unthinkable—or So They Claim! This wild clip unpacks the city’s strange ‘get inside’ plan. Will it save you from atomic chaos? Watch and decide—before it’s too late!
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1909720012203737277
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1909720012203737277
Repost qilingan:
Twitter Relay
06.04.202516:20
Tariffs are a federal tool, not a state plaything, and Gavin Newsom’s grandstanding against Trump’s tariffs is nothing but hot, stinky air.
For over 45 years, Iran has strategically used high tariffs on foreign cars to bolster its domestic economy, even through economic hardship, showing how tariffs can protect local industries when applied at a national level. Iran’s tariffs on imported cars have ranged from 55% to over 100%, depending on engine size and value—55% for engines up to 1.5 liters, 75% for 1.5 to 2 liters, 95% for 2 to 2.5 liters, and up to 100% for 2.5 to 3 liters in 2017, with additional taxes and customs duties further driving up costs.
After lifting a car import ban in 2022, Iran capped imported car values at 20,000 euros to prioritize affordability, yet likely kept tariffs high, possibly around 100% for some models. By early 2025, tariffs on cars over $50,000 may still hit 100%, though exact rates remain murky due to sanctions and lobbying. These federal tariffs, consistently applied for decades, aim to curb foreign exchange outflows and support Iran’s local automakers like Iran Khodro and Saipa, despite ongoing demand for imports.
Meanwhile, Newsom’s claim to negotiate independent trade deals for California to bypass Trump’s tariffs—posted on X at https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1908158463366283285—oversteps his authority.
Tariffs fall under federal jurisdiction, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8). Over the years, Congress has delegated some of this authority to the executive branch, as seen with Trump’s use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum for national security reasons. Newsom, as a state governor, lacks the legal standing to challenge or circumvent federal tariff policy through state-level trade agreements. His rhetoric about California’s economic might—14% of U.S. GDP and the world’s 5th largest economy—doesn’t change the fact that international trade policy is a federal responsibility, not a state one. Newsom’s approach ignores the lessons from Iran’s tariff strategy: effective tariffs require unified, national implementation to protect domestic industries, not fragmented state-level rebellion that undermines federal authority.
https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1908158463366283285
For over 45 years, Iran has strategically used high tariffs on foreign cars to bolster its domestic economy, even through economic hardship, showing how tariffs can protect local industries when applied at a national level. Iran’s tariffs on imported cars have ranged from 55% to over 100%, depending on engine size and value—55% for engines up to 1.5 liters, 75% for 1.5 to 2 liters, 95% for 2 to 2.5 liters, and up to 100% for 2.5 to 3 liters in 2017, with additional taxes and customs duties further driving up costs.
After lifting a car import ban in 2022, Iran capped imported car values at 20,000 euros to prioritize affordability, yet likely kept tariffs high, possibly around 100% for some models. By early 2025, tariffs on cars over $50,000 may still hit 100%, though exact rates remain murky due to sanctions and lobbying. These federal tariffs, consistently applied for decades, aim to curb foreign exchange outflows and support Iran’s local automakers like Iran Khodro and Saipa, despite ongoing demand for imports.
Meanwhile, Newsom’s claim to negotiate independent trade deals for California to bypass Trump’s tariffs—posted on X at https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1908158463366283285—oversteps his authority.
Tariffs fall under federal jurisdiction, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8). Over the years, Congress has delegated some of this authority to the executive branch, as seen with Trump’s use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum for national security reasons. Newsom, as a state governor, lacks the legal standing to challenge or circumvent federal tariff policy through state-level trade agreements. His rhetoric about California’s economic might—14% of U.S. GDP and the world’s 5th largest economy—doesn’t change the fact that international trade policy is a federal responsibility, not a state one. Newsom’s approach ignores the lessons from Iran’s tariff strategy: effective tariffs require unified, national implementation to protect domestic industries, not fragmented state-level rebellion that undermines federal authority.
https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/1908158463366283285
Repost qilingan:
Europa Last Battle
01.04.202504:32
Argentina's Milei to declassify documents on Nazi war criminals who fled to Argentina | DW News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhA_w2Wiqeo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhA_w2Wiqeo
Repost qilingan:Europa Last Battle
01.04.202504:06
Secret documents on Nazis who fled to Argentina after WWII being declassified
The documents will likely include Nazi-linked bank accounts and records documenting the use of Nazi 'ratlines'
https://www.foxnews.com/world/secret-documents-on-nazis-who-fled-to-argentina-after-wwii-being-declassified
The documents will likely include Nazi-linked bank accounts and records documenting the use of Nazi 'ratlines'
https://www.foxnews.com/world/secret-documents-on-nazis-who-fled-to-argentina-after-wwii-being-declassified
Repost qilingan:Europa Last Battle
01.04.202503:43
"Javier Milei Shocks the World: Documents Reveal Hitler's 1945 Escape to Argentina"
https://rumble.com/v6rf75c-javier-milei-just-shocked-the-world-releasing-documents-on-hitlers-escape-t.html
Here are the key points:
1. Hitler's Escape Claim Amplified by Milei’s Actions: The speaker asserts that Javier Milei, by releasing documents, has shocked the world by providing evidence that Adolf Hitler did not die in a Berlin bunker in 1945 but escaped Germany weeks earlier via underground tunnels to an airstrip, then fled to Argentina using U-boats.
2. Life in Argentina Confirmed by Documents: Milei’s document release allegedly substantiates that Hitler lived in Argentina, particularly in Bariloche, for nearly two decades until the mid-1960s, alongside numerous Third Reich members who established a significant operational base there.
3. Milei’s Document Release as Proof: The Argentinian President’s order to declassify all remaining Nazi-related documents is presented as a bombshell revelation, purportedly validating claims of Hitler’s escape and residence in Argentina post-World War II.
4. Intelligence Agencies Implicated: The speaker ties Milei’s released documents to CIA and FBI records, suggesting they confirm U.S. and allied knowledge—and possible facilitation—of Hitler’s survival in Argentina, with references to Operation Paperclip as a related mechanism.
5. Operation Paperclip Expanded: The documents released by Milei are said to reveal that Operation Paperclip not only involved scientists but also intelligence operatives who were recruited from Argentina after escaping there, a process enabled by the U.S.
6. Soviet Evidence Supported: Milei’s shocking release allegedly aligns with findings that the skull in Russia, claimed to be Hitler’s, is female, and includes Stalin’s statements that Hitler survived, reinforcing the escape narrative.
7. Hitler’s Alleged Descendants: The speaker speculates that Milei’s documents might reveal Hitler had two daughters in Argentina, with their descendants’ whereabouts a tantalizing possibility now brought to light by this release.
8. Transparency Era Highlighted: Milei’s action is framed as part of a broader transparency wave, shocking the world by exposing hidden truths, paralleled with mentions of Epstein file investigations under the Trump administration.
9. Intelligence Influence Unveiled: The released documents are suggested to detail how Nazis in Argentina, facilitated by Milei’s revelations, shaped U.S. intelligence’s anti-communist stance, offering a new historical perspective.
10. Cultural Reinforcement: The speaker cites books like "The Gray Wolf" and the show "Hunting Hitler," suggesting Milei’s document release aligns with and amplifies these narratives, with an invitation to Tim Kennedy to discuss further.
11. Rejection of Debunking: The speaker claims Milei’s shocking document release proves the escape story is "bunked" (confirmed), not debunked, challenging mainstream AI and tech narratives like those from Grok or Google.
These points reframe the original narrative to emphasize the sensational claim of Milei’s document release as a world-shocking event, aligning with the conspiracy theory of Hitler’s escape to Argentina, while maintaining the speaker’s original intent and assertions.
https://rumble.com/v6rf75c-javier-milei-just-shocked-the-world-releasing-documents-on-hitlers-escape-t.html
Here are the key points:
1. Hitler's Escape Claim Amplified by Milei’s Actions: The speaker asserts that Javier Milei, by releasing documents, has shocked the world by providing evidence that Adolf Hitler did not die in a Berlin bunker in 1945 but escaped Germany weeks earlier via underground tunnels to an airstrip, then fled to Argentina using U-boats.
2. Life in Argentina Confirmed by Documents: Milei’s document release allegedly substantiates that Hitler lived in Argentina, particularly in Bariloche, for nearly two decades until the mid-1960s, alongside numerous Third Reich members who established a significant operational base there.
3. Milei’s Document Release as Proof: The Argentinian President’s order to declassify all remaining Nazi-related documents is presented as a bombshell revelation, purportedly validating claims of Hitler’s escape and residence in Argentina post-World War II.
4. Intelligence Agencies Implicated: The speaker ties Milei’s released documents to CIA and FBI records, suggesting they confirm U.S. and allied knowledge—and possible facilitation—of Hitler’s survival in Argentina, with references to Operation Paperclip as a related mechanism.
5. Operation Paperclip Expanded: The documents released by Milei are said to reveal that Operation Paperclip not only involved scientists but also intelligence operatives who were recruited from Argentina after escaping there, a process enabled by the U.S.
6. Soviet Evidence Supported: Milei’s shocking release allegedly aligns with findings that the skull in Russia, claimed to be Hitler’s, is female, and includes Stalin’s statements that Hitler survived, reinforcing the escape narrative.
7. Hitler’s Alleged Descendants: The speaker speculates that Milei’s documents might reveal Hitler had two daughters in Argentina, with their descendants’ whereabouts a tantalizing possibility now brought to light by this release.
8. Transparency Era Highlighted: Milei’s action is framed as part of a broader transparency wave, shocking the world by exposing hidden truths, paralleled with mentions of Epstein file investigations under the Trump administration.
9. Intelligence Influence Unveiled: The released documents are suggested to detail how Nazis in Argentina, facilitated by Milei’s revelations, shaped U.S. intelligence’s anti-communist stance, offering a new historical perspective.
10. Cultural Reinforcement: The speaker cites books like "The Gray Wolf" and the show "Hunting Hitler," suggesting Milei’s document release aligns with and amplifies these narratives, with an invitation to Tim Kennedy to discuss further.
11. Rejection of Debunking: The speaker claims Milei’s shocking document release proves the escape story is "bunked" (confirmed), not debunked, challenging mainstream AI and tech narratives like those from Grok or Google.
These points reframe the original narrative to emphasize the sensational claim of Milei’s document release as a world-shocking event, aligning with the conspiracy theory of Hitler’s escape to Argentina, while maintaining the speaker’s original intent and assertions.
Repost qilingan:
The Storm
02.04.202500:17
The United States Court of Federal Claims
The United States Court of Federal Claims is a specialized federal court in the United States that primarily handles claims against the U.S. government for money damages. Established under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, it’s often referred to as the "People's Court" because it’s where individuals, businesses, and other entities can sue the federal government when they believe they’re owed compensation.
What It Does
The Court of Federal Claims deals with cases where someone claims the government has wronged them financially. This includes:
Contract disputes: When the government doesn’t pay for goods or services it agreed to buy.
Tax refunds: When someone believes they overpaid taxes and the IRS won’t refund them.
Fifth Amendment takings: When the government takes private property (like land) for public use without fair compensation.
Federal employee pay issues: Disputes over back pay, benefits, or wages for government workers.
Vaccine injury claims: Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, it hears cases about injuries allegedly caused by vaccines.
It doesn’t handle criminal cases, civil rights disputes, or lawsuits between private parties—those go to other federal or state courts. Its focus is narrow: money claims against the federal government.
How It Works
Jurisdiction: Congress defines what kinds of cases it can hear, rooted in the Tucker Act of 1887, which waived some of the government’s sovereign immunity (the idea that the government can’t be sued without its consent).
Judges: It has 16 active judges appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 15-year terms. They’re based in Washington, D.C., but can hold trials anywhere in the U.S.
Appeals: Decisions can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Why It Matters
It’s a key check on government accountability. If the U.S. breaches a contract, seizes property, or mishandles payments, this court provides a way to seek justice—without it, people would be stuck lobbying Congress for relief, which was the old, inefficient way.
Historically, it evolved from a system where Congress had to pass individual laws to pay claims—think of it as cutting out the middleman. Today, it processes thousands of cases yearly, ranging from multimillion-dollar disputes with defense contractors to small claims from everyday citizens.
The United States Court of Federal Claims is a specialized federal court in the United States that primarily handles claims against the U.S. government for money damages. Established under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, it’s often referred to as the "People's Court" because it’s where individuals, businesses, and other entities can sue the federal government when they believe they’re owed compensation.
What It Does
The Court of Federal Claims deals with cases where someone claims the government has wronged them financially. This includes:
Contract disputes: When the government doesn’t pay for goods or services it agreed to buy.
Tax refunds: When someone believes they overpaid taxes and the IRS won’t refund them.
Fifth Amendment takings: When the government takes private property (like land) for public use without fair compensation.
Federal employee pay issues: Disputes over back pay, benefits, or wages for government workers.
Vaccine injury claims: Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, it hears cases about injuries allegedly caused by vaccines.
It doesn’t handle criminal cases, civil rights disputes, or lawsuits between private parties—those go to other federal or state courts. Its focus is narrow: money claims against the federal government.
How It Works
Jurisdiction: Congress defines what kinds of cases it can hear, rooted in the Tucker Act of 1887, which waived some of the government’s sovereign immunity (the idea that the government can’t be sued without its consent).
Judges: It has 16 active judges appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 15-year terms. They’re based in Washington, D.C., but can hold trials anywhere in the U.S.
Appeals: Decisions can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Why It Matters
It’s a key check on government accountability. If the U.S. breaches a contract, seizes property, or mishandles payments, this court provides a way to seek justice—without it, people would be stuck lobbying Congress for relief, which was the old, inefficient way.
Historically, it evolved from a system where Congress had to pass individual laws to pay claims—think of it as cutting out the middleman. Today, it processes thousands of cases yearly, ranging from multimillion-dollar disputes with defense contractors to small claims from everyday citizens.
Repost qilingan:
Elon Musk Relay
26.03.202522:58
🚨 WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails until after the 2016 election
He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case
This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1905013971800994268
He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case
This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1905013971800994268
Repost qilingan:Twitter Relay
02.04.202502:52
US F-16 intercepting a Russian Tu-95 was subjected to an unsafe maneuver by a Russian Su-35
Ko'proq funksiyalarni ochish uchun tizimga kiring.
