Megyn Kelly
TGlist reytingi
0
0
TuriOmmaviy
Tekshirish
TekshirilmaganIshonchnoma
ShubhaliJoylashuvРосія
TilBoshqa
Kanal yaratilgan sanaКвіт 26, 2023
TGlist-ga qo'shildi
Серп 24, 2024Rekordlar
31.01.202523:59
228Obunachilar18.09.202423:59
0Iqtiboslar indeksi07.02.202503:36
23Bitta post qamrovi02.11.202423:59
15Reklama posti qamrovi07.03.202508:59
50.00%ER31.10.202423:59
11.63%ERRRepost qilingan:
Pedo Pete
06.04.202506:51
Getting out of politics and diving right back into reality? 😂
Repost qilingan:Pedo Pete
06.04.202506:25
"The 'One Big, Beautiful Bill': Balancing Tax Relief and Spending Cuts for Lower and Middle Classes in 2025"
Summary:
The "One Big, Beautiful Bill," proposed by President Trump and House Republicans in 2025, aims to cut $2 trillion from mandatory spending over 10 years, targeting Medicaid ($880 billion), Medicare (unspecified but at risk), and SNAP ($150–$200 billion), while offering $4.5 trillion in tax cuts.
These cuts could impact 74 million Medicaid enrollees, 67 million Medicare beneficiaries, and 41 million SNAP recipients, potentially increasing healthcare costs and food insecurity.
However, the bill provides benefits for lower and middle-income households:
TCJA extension saves middle-class families $1,400 annually, exemptions for tips, overtime, and Social Security benefits save $500–$3,000 per year, energy deregulation may reduce costs by $200–$300, and 1 million potential small business jobs could boost employment.
Border security enhancements might improve safety and wages in border communities. Despite these benefits, the bill disproportionately favors the wealthy and corporations ($1.8 trillion in tax cuts for the top 5%, $400 billion for corporations), exacerbating inequality.
As of April 5, 2025, the bill is delayed, with funding extended through September 30, 2025, leaving its final impact uncertain. Initial analyses were biased by critical, left-leaning sources, underrepresenting these benefits, but the net effect still leans regressive due to the scale of spending cuts.
https://t.me/akabiden/7547
Summary:
The "One Big, Beautiful Bill," proposed by President Trump and House Republicans in 2025, aims to cut $2 trillion from mandatory spending over 10 years, targeting Medicaid ($880 billion), Medicare (unspecified but at risk), and SNAP ($150–$200 billion), while offering $4.5 trillion in tax cuts.
These cuts could impact 74 million Medicaid enrollees, 67 million Medicare beneficiaries, and 41 million SNAP recipients, potentially increasing healthcare costs and food insecurity.
However, the bill provides benefits for lower and middle-income households:
TCJA extension saves middle-class families $1,400 annually, exemptions for tips, overtime, and Social Security benefits save $500–$3,000 per year, energy deregulation may reduce costs by $200–$300, and 1 million potential small business jobs could boost employment.
Border security enhancements might improve safety and wages in border communities. Despite these benefits, the bill disproportionately favors the wealthy and corporations ($1.8 trillion in tax cuts for the top 5%, $400 billion for corporations), exacerbating inequality.
As of April 5, 2025, the bill is delayed, with funding extended through September 30, 2025, leaving its final impact uncertain. Initial analyses were biased by critical, left-leaning sources, underrepresenting these benefits, but the net effect still leans regressive due to the scale of spending cuts.
https://t.me/akabiden/7547
Repost qilingan:
The Truth About Vaccines
16.04.202522:03
🥳
In Idaho, ivermectin can be sold over the counter — after Gov. Little signs bill
Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed into law a bill to let ivermectin be sold as an over-the-counter medicine — without a prescription or consultation with a health care professional.
Typically used to treat parasites in humans, ivermectin has drawn interest since the COVID pandemic — after largely conservative activists, doctors and politicians inaccurately touted it as an alternative medicine.
Usually, the U.S. Food and Drug and Administration, or FDA, handles whether drugs should be made available over-the-counter, a process that uses data on safety and effectiveness.
The FDA hasn’t approved ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19, saying the federal agency finds existing clinical trial data don’t show “ivermectin is effective against COVID-19 in humans.” The federal regulator’s website also warns large doses of ivermectin “can be dangerous,” overdose can risk death, and human-appropriate doses can interact with other medications, such as blood thinners.
Little on Monday signed Senate Bill 1211, the ivermectin deregulation bill, according to the governor office’s legislation tracker. The new law takes effect immediately — through an emergency clause.
Passed during the last week of this year’s legislative session, Idaho lawmakers didn’t hear public feedback on the bill from doctors, pharmacists or health care professionals.
https://idahocapitalsun.com/briefs/in-idaho-ivermectin-can-be-sold-over-the-counter-after-gov-little-signs-bill/
In Idaho, ivermectin can be sold over the counter — after Gov. Little signs bill
Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed into law a bill to let ivermectin be sold as an over-the-counter medicine — without a prescription or consultation with a health care professional.
Typically used to treat parasites in humans, ivermectin has drawn interest since the COVID pandemic — after largely conservative activists, doctors and politicians inaccurately touted it as an alternative medicine.
Usually, the U.S. Food and Drug and Administration, or FDA, handles whether drugs should be made available over-the-counter, a process that uses data on safety and effectiveness.
The FDA hasn’t approved ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19, saying the federal agency finds existing clinical trial data don’t show “ivermectin is effective against COVID-19 in humans.” The federal regulator’s website also warns large doses of ivermectin “can be dangerous,” overdose can risk death, and human-appropriate doses can interact with other medications, such as blood thinners.
Little on Monday signed Senate Bill 1211, the ivermectin deregulation bill, according to the governor office’s legislation tracker. The new law takes effect immediately — through an emergency clause.
Passed during the last week of this year’s legislative session, Idaho lawmakers didn’t hear public feedback on the bill from doctors, pharmacists or health care professionals.
https://idahocapitalsun.com/briefs/in-idaho-ivermectin-can-be-sold-over-the-counter-after-gov-little-signs-bill/
Repost qilingan:
Jimmy Dore Show
06.04.202517:09
Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise.
If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution.
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1908928009027084792
If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution.
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1908928009027084792
Repost qilingan:
Europa Last Battle
07.04.202500:11
When you slow it all down, you start noticing things... 🧐 Isn't that right?
06.04.202521:30
Chamath s CDS Bet: Outlining Major Corporate Debt Default Risks
Duration: 00:01:32
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zfkfbC83q_8
Duration: 00:01:32
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zfkfbC83q_8
Repost qilingan:
Twitter Relay
19.04.202504:50
Mortgage Fraud Fallout: Project Veritas CONFIRMS Letitia James’ Misclassified Brooklyn Residence!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBy8ww88r0c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBy8ww88r0c
Repost qilingan:
NewsTreason Channel 17 (Dave)
19.04.202502:52
DEC[L]AS
They updated COVID.gov to redirect to the TRUTH.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/
🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸
They updated COVID.gov to redirect to the TRUTH.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/
🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸
Repost qilingan:Twitter Relay
19.04.202502:45
---
### Loyalists and Modern Trump Critics: Defenders of the Established Order
In both the 18th century and today, certain segments of society have acted as defenders of a prevailing power structure—resisting radical change in favor of continuity, stability, and control. In the 1770s, they were called Loyalists. Today, they might be likened to critics of Donald Trump who rally to defend what they see as “democratic norms,” though these norms increasingly resemble an entrenched elite consensus.
---
### Loyalists: Protectors of Imperial Order
During the American Revolution, Loyalists were colonists who remained faithful to the British Crown. Their motivations were practical, ideological, and often self-interested:
- Trust in the British system: They believed in the legitimacy of British governance and feared the instability of revolution.
- Economic and class interests: Many had business ties, government appointments, or social status dependent on the existing order.
- Cultural alignment: Especially among newer immigrants, loyalty to Britain felt natural and safe.
Though the Revolutionaries saw themselves as freedom fighters, the Loyalists saw them as reckless radicals destabilizing a functioning system. In many ways, Loyalists were the defenders of *the norm*—an imperial order that had governed the colonies for generations.
---
### Modern Trump Critics: Gatekeepers of Institutional Power
Fast forward to today: a large contingent of Donald Trump's opponents view themselves as defenders of American “democracy.” But their actions often reflect a defense of the established political class, much like the Loyalists of old. Consider:
- Defense of entrenched institutions: Critics often position Trump's challenges to the media, courts, intelligence community, and federal agencies as existential threats—not necessarily because those institutions are perfect, but because they represent the status quo.
- Alignment with elite narratives: From universities to corporate media to global institutions, Trump’s critics often align with systems that wield enormous cultural and economic influence.
- Fear of populist disruption: Just like Loyalists feared revolutionaries would upend order, many modern Trump critics fear populism as a force that threatens to “break” the system—even if that system is already seen by some Americans as corrupt or unrepresentative.
---
### Then and Now: A Reflection of Power and Resistance
The key parallel:
- Loyalists: Defended a powerful, established imperial structure in the face of rebellious calls for independence.
- Trump Critics: Defend a powerful, entrenched national and global structure against a populist insurgency.
### Loyalists and Modern Trump Critics: Defenders of the Established Order
In both the 18th century and today, certain segments of society have acted as defenders of a prevailing power structure—resisting radical change in favor of continuity, stability, and control. In the 1770s, they were called Loyalists. Today, they might be likened to critics of Donald Trump who rally to defend what they see as “democratic norms,” though these norms increasingly resemble an entrenched elite consensus.
---
### Loyalists: Protectors of Imperial Order
During the American Revolution, Loyalists were colonists who remained faithful to the British Crown. Their motivations were practical, ideological, and often self-interested:
- Trust in the British system: They believed in the legitimacy of British governance and feared the instability of revolution.
- Economic and class interests: Many had business ties, government appointments, or social status dependent on the existing order.
- Cultural alignment: Especially among newer immigrants, loyalty to Britain felt natural and safe.
Though the Revolutionaries saw themselves as freedom fighters, the Loyalists saw them as reckless radicals destabilizing a functioning system. In many ways, Loyalists were the defenders of *the norm*—an imperial order that had governed the colonies for generations.
---
### Modern Trump Critics: Gatekeepers of Institutional Power
Fast forward to today: a large contingent of Donald Trump's opponents view themselves as defenders of American “democracy.” But their actions often reflect a defense of the established political class, much like the Loyalists of old. Consider:
- Defense of entrenched institutions: Critics often position Trump's challenges to the media, courts, intelligence community, and federal agencies as existential threats—not necessarily because those institutions are perfect, but because they represent the status quo.
- Alignment with elite narratives: From universities to corporate media to global institutions, Trump’s critics often align with systems that wield enormous cultural and economic influence.
- Fear of populist disruption: Just like Loyalists feared revolutionaries would upend order, many modern Trump critics fear populism as a force that threatens to “break” the system—even if that system is already seen by some Americans as corrupt or unrepresentative.
---
### Then and Now: A Reflection of Power and Resistance
The key parallel:
- Loyalists: Defended a powerful, established imperial structure in the face of rebellious calls for independence.
- Trump Critics: Defend a powerful, entrenched national and global structure against a populist insurgency.
Repost qilingan:
Our White House
19.04.202501:53
250 Years Later: Paul Revere s Ride
Duration: 00:01:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esobPRrC3rU
Duration: 00:01:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esobPRrC3rU
Repost qilingan:Our White House
19.04.202501:52
“The Shot Heard Round the World”: The Battles of Lexington and Concord
Duration: 00:11:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CawTnediEuU
Duration: 00:11:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CawTnediEuU
Repost qilingan:Our White House
19.04.202501:52
The Story of America, an Introduction
Duration: 00:07:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LORpUiPlm3s
Duration: 00:07:31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LORpUiPlm3s
Repost qilingan:Our White House
19.04.202501:51
President Trump & Italian PM Meloni at the White House, Apr. 17, 2025
Duration: 00:00:36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoi6HKpUDLI
Duration: 00:00:36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoi6HKpUDLI
Repost qilingan:Our White House
19.04.202501:51
2025 White House Easter Prayer Dinner
Duration: 00:00:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoN3uB8EKBU
Duration: 00:00:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoN3uB8EKBU
Ko'proq funksiyalarni ochish uchun tizimga kiring.
