Angelo Giuliano 🇮🇹🇨🇭
TGlist reytingi
0
0
TuriOmmaviy
Tekshirish
TekshirilmaganIshonchnoma
ShubhaliJoylashuv
TilBoshqa
Kanal yaratilgan sanaJan 20, 2021
TGlist-ga qo'shildi
Jun 26, 2024Muxrlangan guruh
Rekordlar
02.04.202523:59
2.3KObunachilar25.03.202523:59
200Iqtiboslar indeksi29.03.202523:59
1.7KBitta post qamrovi03.04.202518:38
1.6KReklama posti qamrovi16.03.202519:20
176.47%ER29.03.202523:59
74.97%ERR
04.04.202504:43
Will be in Moscow for Victory DAY. Will be filming, interviewing and writing about it.
For the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over NAZI Germany.
Special moment
For the 80th anniversary of the Soviet victory over NAZI Germany.
Special moment
29.03.202502:55
Translation >
"Hey orange man, you can talk as much as you want, I hold the cards and I will have the final say....in the meantime you can talk and I will pretend to listen"
"And yes....I don't mind if you are antigonising with EU, with the btches Starmer and Macron"
"Hey orange man, you can talk as much as you want, I hold the cards and I will have the final say....in the meantime you can talk and I will pretend to listen"
"And yes....I don't mind if you are antigonising with EU, with the btches Starmer and Macron"
25.03.202503:28
# Project 2025: A Power Grab Fueled by Thiel’s Surveillance AI and the Risk of a Dystopian Future
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/project-2025-a-power-grab-fueled?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
https://open.substack.com/pub/angelogiuliano/p/project-2025-a-power-grab-fueled?r=4v2k3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
12.03.202502:22
*Time to get your money out of the EU*
They will finance the deficits and huge defence investments +800 billion Euro from people's saving accounts.
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission
Statement (March 11, 2025, implied via X post sentiment): "We'll turn private savings into much needed investment."
Bruno Le Maire, French Finance Minister
Quote (February 23, 2024): "Mobilize all the savings of Europeans that are currently dormant in European bank accounts" to finance the future, including Europe’s "defense effort."
Pierre Gramegna, ESM Managing Director
Quote (January 21, 2025): "The idea of a Savings and Investment Union aims to bring more Europeans into the capital market. Savers should be able to achieve better returns on their savings, and companies should get better financing conditions."
Christine Lagarde, ECB President
Quote (November 21, 2024): "Europeans save a high share of their income: around 13% in 2023 compared with around 8% in the United States. But typically, Europeans favour low-risk, liquid savings products. In Europe, approximately €11.5 trillion is held in cash and deposits. This is one-third of households’ total financial assets."
Mario Draghi, Former ECB President and EU Competitiveness Advisor
Quote (September 9, 2024): "Europe needs to mobilize private savings at an unprecedented scale—up to €500 billion annually—to close the investment gap with the US and China. This requires a fully integrated capital market."
Paschal Donohoe, Eurogroup President
Quote (March 11, 2024): "We need to deepen the Capital Markets Union to ensure that the savings of our citizens can be effectively used to finance the green and digital transitions."
They will finance the deficits and huge defence investments +800 billion Euro from people's saving accounts.
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission
Statement (March 11, 2025, implied via X post sentiment): "We'll turn private savings into much needed investment."
Bruno Le Maire, French Finance Minister
Quote (February 23, 2024): "Mobilize all the savings of Europeans that are currently dormant in European bank accounts" to finance the future, including Europe’s "defense effort."
Pierre Gramegna, ESM Managing Director
Quote (January 21, 2025): "The idea of a Savings and Investment Union aims to bring more Europeans into the capital market. Savers should be able to achieve better returns on their savings, and companies should get better financing conditions."
Christine Lagarde, ECB President
Quote (November 21, 2024): "Europeans save a high share of their income: around 13% in 2023 compared with around 8% in the United States. But typically, Europeans favour low-risk, liquid savings products. In Europe, approximately €11.5 trillion is held in cash and deposits. This is one-third of households’ total financial assets."
Mario Draghi, Former ECB President and EU Competitiveness Advisor
Quote (September 9, 2024): "Europe needs to mobilize private savings at an unprecedented scale—up to €500 billion annually—to close the investment gap with the US and China. This requires a fully integrated capital market."
Paschal Donohoe, Eurogroup President
Quote (March 11, 2024): "We need to deepen the Capital Markets Union to ensure that the savings of our citizens can be effectively used to finance the green and digital transitions."
03.04.202506:22
Top 30 Countries Exporting to the USA and Trade Dependency Analysis
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
Below is a list of the 30 largest exporters to the U.S., along with their export dependency on the U.S. market and the U.S.'s reciprocal export reliance on them. Data reflects approximate percentages based on recent trade patterns (pre-2023).
Rationale for U.S. Strength in Applying Tariffs and Coercion
1 Asymmetric Trade Dependence:
◦ Most countries rely far more on the U.S. market than the U.S. relies on theirs. For example:
▪ Mexico: 80% of its exports go to the U.S., but the U.S. sends only 16% of its exports there.
▪ Canada: 75% dependency vs. 18% U.S. export share.
◦ This imbalance gives the U.S. leverage to impose tariffs without facing proportional retaliation.
2 Market Size and Diversification:
◦ The U.S. is the world’s largest consumer market. Losing access is catastrophic for export-dependent economies (e.g., Vietnam, Taiwan).
◦ The U.S. can diversify imports (e.g., shifting from China to Southeast Asia), while smaller economies struggle to replace the U.S. as a buyer.
3 Economic Coercion Power:
◦ Tariffs inflict more pain on target countries. For instance, a 10% U.S. tariff on China impacts 1.7% of China’s GDP but only 0.1% of U.S. GDP.
◦ The U.S. uses this to force concessions (e.g., USMCA renegotiation with Mexico/Canada, Phase One deal with China).
4 Domestic Political Resilience:
◦ U.S. exporters are less vulnerable to foreign retaliation (e.g., only 8% of U.S. exports go to China). This reduces domestic opposition to tariffs compared to countries where exporters dominate politics.
5 Strategic Exceptions:
◦ Even in cases of mutual dependency (e.g., Taiwan’s semiconductors), the U.S. leverages security alliances to mitigate risks, while competitors lack alternatives.
6 Limited Collective Retaliation:
◦ Coordinated retaliation (e.g., EU or ASEAN) is rare due to divergent interests. The U.S. can negotiate bilaterally, exploiting divisions.
Conclusion
The U.S. holds a structurally dominant position in trade conflicts due to asymmetric dependencies, market size, and diversification capacity. Tariffs act as a coercive tool because the economic harm to target countries outweighs the costs to the U.S., enabling the U.S. to reshape trade terms in its favor.
09.03.202503:23
March 6th-7th Announcements: Poland, Finland, and the Baltics Step Up to Replace Ukraine as the West’s New Puppets Against Russia
🇵🇱 Poland’s PM Tusk dropped a bombshell: Poland is now pursuing nuclear weapons.
🇵🇱 Tusk also declared that all adult men will undergo military training, and Poland’s army will balloon from 200,000 to 500,000 soldiers.
🇵🇱 Oh, and Poland is ditching the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel mines.
🇫🇮 Finland’s Chairman of the Parliament’s Defense Committee, Jukka Kopra, signaled that Finland will likely withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty this spring.
🇪🇪 Estonia’s Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Marko Mihkelson, confirmed that Estonia is likely following Finland, Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania out of the Ottawa Treaty.
🇱🇹 Lithuania has already pulled out of the Oslo Convention banning cluster munitions.
🇱🇹 Defense Minister D. Sakaliene announced that Lithuania will decide this spring whether to also ditch the Ottawa Treaty, with the process already underway since January.
What do all these countries have in common?
They all border Russia.
🇵🇱🇫🇮🇪🇪🇱🇹 These nations are positioning themselves as the next wave of cannon fodder for the West’s proxy war against Russia. While Ukraine crumbles, they’re stepping up to play the same dangerous game—arming up, tearing up treaties, and preparing to antagonize Russia. The script is clear: the US needs new puppets, and these countries are volunteering for the role. Wake up—this is the new frontline.
This is what Peter Hegseth calls > "the division of labor".
EU pins down Russian troops in the West while US can disengage from Europe and completely shift towards China.
🇵🇱 Poland’s PM Tusk dropped a bombshell: Poland is now pursuing nuclear weapons.
🇵🇱 Tusk also declared that all adult men will undergo military training, and Poland’s army will balloon from 200,000 to 500,000 soldiers.
🇵🇱 Oh, and Poland is ditching the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel mines.
🇫🇮 Finland’s Chairman of the Parliament’s Defense Committee, Jukka Kopra, signaled that Finland will likely withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty this spring.
🇪🇪 Estonia’s Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Marko Mihkelson, confirmed that Estonia is likely following Finland, Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania out of the Ottawa Treaty.
🇱🇹 Lithuania has already pulled out of the Oslo Convention banning cluster munitions.
🇱🇹 Defense Minister D. Sakaliene announced that Lithuania will decide this spring whether to also ditch the Ottawa Treaty, with the process already underway since January.
What do all these countries have in common?
They all border Russia.
🇵🇱🇫🇮🇪🇪🇱🇹 These nations are positioning themselves as the next wave of cannon fodder for the West’s proxy war against Russia. While Ukraine crumbles, they’re stepping up to play the same dangerous game—arming up, tearing up treaties, and preparing to antagonize Russia. The script is clear: the US needs new puppets, and these countries are volunteering for the role. Wake up—this is the new frontline.
This is what Peter Hegseth calls > "the division of labor".
EU pins down Russian troops in the West while US can disengage from Europe and completely shift towards China.
09.03.202503:04
Biden Admin Accused of Importing Violent Gangs as Part of "Strategy of Chaos"
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro claims the Biden administration pressured him to release members of Tren de Aragua—a violent Venezuelan gang—into the U.S. Designated a transnational criminal organization in 2024 and a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 2025, Tren de Aragua is notorious for drug trafficking and exploiting the Venezuelan refugee crisis to expand into American cities.
Maduro’s allegations suggest a deliberate "strategy of chaos" by U.S. elites to fuel insecurity, divide the population, and justify authoritarian measures. Importing violent gangs destabilizes communities, creates fear, and erodes civil liberties—all while consolidating power for the ruling class.
If true, this is a blatant betrayal of the American people. The Biden administration must be held accountable for endangering public safety and undermining trust in government. This is not just incompetence—it’s a calculated move to control through chaos. The American people deserve answers, and those responsible must face consequences.
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro claims the Biden administration pressured him to release members of Tren de Aragua—a violent Venezuelan gang—into the U.S. Designated a transnational criminal organization in 2024 and a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 2025, Tren de Aragua is notorious for drug trafficking and exploiting the Venezuelan refugee crisis to expand into American cities.
Maduro’s allegations suggest a deliberate "strategy of chaos" by U.S. elites to fuel insecurity, divide the population, and justify authoritarian measures. Importing violent gangs destabilizes communities, creates fear, and erodes civil liberties—all while consolidating power for the ruling class.
If true, this is a blatant betrayal of the American people. The Biden administration must be held accountable for endangering public safety and undermining trust in government. This is not just incompetence—it’s a calculated move to control through chaos. The American people deserve answers, and those responsible must face consequences.
10.03.202502:05
LEAKED 🚨 Hillary Clinton's emails on #Syria reveal a chilling truth: the U.S. knew overthrowing Assad would result in the massacre of Christians and Shia (Alawites), yet they pushed forward because it served Israel's interests. The bloodshed was calculated, and the agenda was clear.
Ko'proq funksiyalarni ochish uchun tizimga kiring.
