Dollar_Vigilante
24.02.202515:34
Dollar_Vigilante
Jew-ish Elon Musk Living Out His Grandfather’s Dream of a NWO AI Technocracy
Jew-ish Elon Musk Living Out His Grandfather’s Dream of a NWO AI Technocracy
Repost qilingan:
Elon Musk Relay
11.02.202513:10
Joe Rogan claims that the protests against Elon Musk and DOGE are orchestrated and financed by individuals defrauding US taxpayers. He’s absolutely right.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889264141988188211
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889264141988188211
Repost qilingan:
X22-Report
11.02.202512:47
X22-3567-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Is Getting Buried,Avalanche Is Accelerating,We Are Witnessing The 2nd Revolution – Ep. 3567
February 9, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Is Getting Buried,Avalanche Is Accelerating,We Are Witnessing The 2nd Revolution – Ep. 3567
February 9, 2025
Repost qilingan:
Grok
11.02.202515:36
First Question: If the police catch the thief who stole from you and your stolen funds are recovered, can you claim that you have lost the funds and therefore declare yourself bankrupt?
No, you cannot claim that you have lost the funds and declare yourself bankrupt if the stolen funds have been recovered. Bankruptcy is a legal status that typically involves an inability to repay debts due to insufficient assets or income. If the funds stolen from you are recovered, they are returned to you, restoring your financial position to what it was before the theft. Therefore, you would not have a valid basis to claim a loss of those funds or declare bankruptcy solely on that premise, as the recovery negates the loss.
Second Question: Now if the US debt was not a debt but a money laundering, is the US in debt?
The classification of the US debt as money laundering rather than legitimate debt would depend on legal and financial investigations to substantiate such a claim. Here’s how this scenario could be analyzed:
Current Understanding of US Debt: The US national debt is the total amount of money the federal government owes, primarily from borrowing through Treasury securities to finance its operations and obligations. This debt is recorded and managed by the Treasury Department and is considered a legitimate financial obligation.
Money Laundering Allegation: If it were proven that what is recorded as US debt actually represents funds involved in money laundering (i.e., the illegal process of making large amounts of money generated by criminal activity appear to have come from legitimate sources), this would imply that these amounts are not genuine debts owed by the government. Instead, they could be seen as part of a criminal scheme to obscure the origins of illicit funds.
Impact on Debt Status: If such allegations were substantiated through rigorous audits and legal proceedings, and it was determined that a significant portion of the recorded debt was not a legitimate obligation but rather a result of fraudulent or criminal activities, then the US might not be considered "in debt" for those specific amounts. The genuine debt would be the remaining balance after excluding the fraudulent portions.
Practical Implications: However, reclassifying or eliminating parts of the national debt would require extensive legal, financial, and political processes. It would involve auditing government financial records, prosecuting those responsible for the money laundering, and potentially restructuring the national debt figures. This could also affect the US's credit rating, international financial relations, and economic policies.
Current Reality: As of now, there is no widely accepted or legally substantiated evidence that the US national debt is primarily a result of money laundering. The debt is recognized by financial institutions, markets, and international bodies as legitimate. Any claims to the contrary would need to be proven with concrete evidence and through appropriate legal channels.
In summary, if the US debt were proven to be largely a result of money laundering rather than legitimate borrowing, the US might not be considered in debt for those specific amounts, but this would require significant evidence and legal action to change the current understanding and accounting of the national debt.
No, you cannot claim that you have lost the funds and declare yourself bankrupt if the stolen funds have been recovered. Bankruptcy is a legal status that typically involves an inability to repay debts due to insufficient assets or income. If the funds stolen from you are recovered, they are returned to you, restoring your financial position to what it was before the theft. Therefore, you would not have a valid basis to claim a loss of those funds or declare bankruptcy solely on that premise, as the recovery negates the loss.
Second Question: Now if the US debt was not a debt but a money laundering, is the US in debt?
The classification of the US debt as money laundering rather than legitimate debt would depend on legal and financial investigations to substantiate such a claim. Here’s how this scenario could be analyzed:
Current Understanding of US Debt: The US national debt is the total amount of money the federal government owes, primarily from borrowing through Treasury securities to finance its operations and obligations. This debt is recorded and managed by the Treasury Department and is considered a legitimate financial obligation.
Money Laundering Allegation: If it were proven that what is recorded as US debt actually represents funds involved in money laundering (i.e., the illegal process of making large amounts of money generated by criminal activity appear to have come from legitimate sources), this would imply that these amounts are not genuine debts owed by the government. Instead, they could be seen as part of a criminal scheme to obscure the origins of illicit funds.
Impact on Debt Status: If such allegations were substantiated through rigorous audits and legal proceedings, and it was determined that a significant portion of the recorded debt was not a legitimate obligation but rather a result of fraudulent or criminal activities, then the US might not be considered "in debt" for those specific amounts. The genuine debt would be the remaining balance after excluding the fraudulent portions.
Practical Implications: However, reclassifying or eliminating parts of the national debt would require extensive legal, financial, and political processes. It would involve auditing government financial records, prosecuting those responsible for the money laundering, and potentially restructuring the national debt figures. This could also affect the US's credit rating, international financial relations, and economic policies.
Current Reality: As of now, there is no widely accepted or legally substantiated evidence that the US national debt is primarily a result of money laundering. The debt is recognized by financial institutions, markets, and international bodies as legitimate. Any claims to the contrary would need to be proven with concrete evidence and through appropriate legal channels.
In summary, if the US debt were proven to be largely a result of money laundering rather than legitimate borrowing, the US might not be considered in debt for those specific amounts, but this would require significant evidence and legal action to change the current understanding and accounting of the national debt.
Repost qilingan:
Mark Dice Show
11.02.202512:40
Mark Dice
1- TOO BAD! LOL
2- I DON'T CARE!
3- THEY ARE TOAST!
4- THEY TORE IT DOWN! 😂
5- They Called Him Crazy in the 90s but He Was Right All Along! 😂
6- THEY'RE BOILING OVER!
7- ALL THE RIGHT PEOPLE ARE GETTING VERY UPSET ABOUT MAGA 2.0 AGENDA ROLLING OUT 😂
8- Beyonce Takes Major Next Step in Her Trans-Racial Journey Trying to Become White
9- DEMS MELTDOWN AS UNPRECEDENTED SWAMP DRAINING CONTINUES!
10- LOVELY! - TRUMP'S GENIUS TERIFF TROLL WORKED! - AND DEMOCRATS MAKE FOOLS OF THEMSELVES!
11- BILL MAHER SEES THE LIGHT? - AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN MAGA 2.0 OVER THE WEEKEND!
12- EVERYBODY KNOWS NOW! - THERE'S NO GOING BACK
1- TOO BAD! LOL
2- I DON'T CARE!
3- THEY ARE TOAST!
4- THEY TORE IT DOWN! 😂
5- They Called Him Crazy in the 90s but He Was Right All Along! 😂
6- THEY'RE BOILING OVER!
7- ALL THE RIGHT PEOPLE ARE GETTING VERY UPSET ABOUT MAGA 2.0 AGENDA ROLLING OUT 😂
8- Beyonce Takes Major Next Step in Her Trans-Racial Journey Trying to Become White
9- DEMS MELTDOWN AS UNPRECEDENTED SWAMP DRAINING CONTINUES!
10- LOVELY! - TRUMP'S GENIUS TERIFF TROLL WORKED! - AND DEMOCRATS MAKE FOOLS OF THEMSELVES!
11- BILL MAHER SEES THE LIGHT? - AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN MAGA 2.0 OVER THE WEEKEND!
12- EVERYBODY KNOWS NOW! - THERE'S NO GOING BACK
Repost qilingan:
TrumpRelay
11.02.202515:47
Federal Judge Threatening Trump Admin With Criminal Charges Over Spending Freeze Used To Be A Major Dem Donor
https://dailycaller.com/2025/02/10/federal-judge-john-mcconnell-jr-trump-admin-criminal-charges-spending-freeze-dem-donor/
https://dailycaller.com/2025/02/10/federal-judge-john-mcconnell-jr-trump-admin-criminal-charges-spending-freeze-dem-donor/
Repost qilingan:X22-Report
11.02.202515:16
X22-3568-Report
Trump Narrative Shift, It’s Not Left vs Right, It’s About Right vs Wrong, Game Over – Ep. 3568
February 10, 2025
https://t.me/X22ReportPod/3023
Trump Narrative Shift, It’s Not Left vs Right, It’s About Right vs Wrong, Game Over – Ep. 3568
February 10, 2025
https://t.me/X22ReportPod/3023
Repost qilingan:
The Daily Signal
11.02.202514:41
Victor Davis Hanson: Sorry Liberals. DOGE is 100% Legal. Here’s Why
Duration: 00:06:59
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7Q2na-WGpcc
Duration: 00:06:59
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7Q2na-WGpcc
Repost qilingan:
Libs of TikTok
11.02.202513:54
Senator Mitch McConnell arrives to votes in a boot and a wheelchair.
Congress has become an old-age home.
TERM LIMITS
Congress has become an old-age home.
TERM LIMITS
Repost qilingan:Elon Musk Relay
11.02.202513:01
Watch What Happened When Elon Musk Changed His Name To Harry Bōlz
Duration: 00:00:37
https://x.com/elonmusk
Duration: 00:00:37
https://x.com/elonmusk
Repost qilingan:
Sky News Australia
06.02.202514:12
Kamala Harris humiliated as CBS releases raw 60 Minutes footage exposing her incompetence
Duration: 00:10:56
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KrkBBoNFcA
Duration: 00:10:56
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KrkBBoNFcA
Repost qilingan:Grok
11.02.202514:39
https://x.com/Ilhan
How many times can a naturalized U.S. citizen marry her own brothers to get them into the U.S. legally?
A naturalized U.S. citizen cannot marry their own brothers to facilitate their immigration into the United States because:
Incest Laws: Marrying one's brother is illegal in the United States due to incest laws. This applies across all states, though the specifics might slightly vary.
Immigration Law: Even if such a marriage were somehow legally possible, immigration laws do not support or recognize marriages between siblings for the purpose of immigration. U.S. immigration law allows citizens to sponsor certain family members for visas, but this does not extend to siblings through marriage where no legal marriage can exist.
Family-Based Immigration: A U.S. citizen can sponsor their siblings for immigration, but this is done through a different process (family-based immigration petitions) and does not require or involve marriage. The process for sponsoring a sibling is quite lengthy and involves different visa categories (like F4 for siblings) with significant waiting times based on country-specific quotas.
Therefore, the concept of marrying one's brothers multiple times to get them into the U.S. is not legally feasible or permissible under current U.S. law. If the intent is to help siblings immigrate, the naturalized citizen would need to look into legal family-based visa options available for siblings, which do not involve marriage.
How many times can a naturalized U.S. citizen marry her own brothers to get them into the U.S. legally?
A naturalized U.S. citizen cannot marry their own brothers to facilitate their immigration into the United States because:
Incest Laws: Marrying one's brother is illegal in the United States due to incest laws. This applies across all states, though the specifics might slightly vary.
Immigration Law: Even if such a marriage were somehow legally possible, immigration laws do not support or recognize marriages between siblings for the purpose of immigration. U.S. immigration law allows citizens to sponsor certain family members for visas, but this does not extend to siblings through marriage where no legal marriage can exist.
Family-Based Immigration: A U.S. citizen can sponsor their siblings for immigration, but this is done through a different process (family-based immigration petitions) and does not require or involve marriage. The process for sponsoring a sibling is quite lengthy and involves different visa categories (like F4 for siblings) with significant waiting times based on country-specific quotas.
Therefore, the concept of marrying one's brothers multiple times to get them into the U.S. is not legally feasible or permissible under current U.S. law. If the intent is to help siblings immigrate, the naturalized citizen would need to look into legal family-based visa options available for siblings, which do not involve marriage.
Repost qilingan:X22-Report
11.02.202513:16
Report on X22 Report Episode 3568 - February 10, 2025
Title: "Trump Narrative Shift: It's Not Left Versus Right, It's About Right Versus Wrong"
Host: Dave
Summary:
The episode of the X22 Report dated February 10, 2025, discusses several themes centered around political, economic, and social issues, with a focus on the actions and policies of Donald Trump's administration. Here are the key points discussed:
Economic and Financial Analysis:
Currency and Debt: The episode mentions Trump's narrative on potentially reducing national debt through exposing fraud in the Treasury and Federal Reserve systems. It suggests that much of the reported debt might be due to fraudulent activities, which could be challenged through audits.
Bitcoin and Gold Investment: There are segments promoting investment in Bitcoin and gold, focusing on security and potential returns. References to Michael Seller's prediction of Bitcoin reaching $10 million per coin are highlighted, along with advice on using crypto Roth IRAs to avoid capital gains tax. The narrative around gold investment mentions a supply decrease in London, attributing this to anticipation of Trump's tariffs.
Federal Reserve Critique: The report criticizes the Federal Reserve for what it describes as criminal activities and fraud, suggesting these have led to currency devaluation over time. Historical data on the declining purchasing power of the dollar since the Federal Reserve's inception in 1913 is cited.
Policy and Political Actions:
Government Efficiency: Trump's administration is depicted as taking measures against government waste, including stopping the minting of pennies due to their production cost exceeding their value, and initiating audits across various government departments like the IRS, Treasury, and Pentagon.
Military and Cultural Policies: Trump's actions to "de-wokenize" military academies by dismissing certain board members and barring gender dysphoria diagnoses from military enlistment are discussed. This is framed as a move towards strengthening the military.
International Relations: The episode mentions Trump's interactions with world leaders, particularly focusing on Ukraine and Russia, with claims that Trump has negotiated terms for peace in Ukraine in exchange for security partnerships and mineral rights.
Judicial and Legislative Moves: There's a discussion on legal challenges to Trump's policies, including judges blocking executive orders, with the implication that these actions will eventually reach the Supreme Court for definitive rulings.
Social Media and Public Opinion:
Media and Public Perception: The report includes segments on how Trump is perceived by the public, citing a poll by CBS where Trump scores high on attributes like toughness and effectiveness. It also notes the White House's new presence on Rumble to promote free speech.
Cultural References: The Super Bowl is mentioned, particularly the reaction to celebrity appearances like Taylor Swift, and the symbolic elements in the halftime performance, suggesting deeper political messages.
Promotional Content:
Advertisements: The episode includes multiple advertisements for services like reliablerxstore.com for medications, mydigitalmoney.com for crypto investments, and x22gold.com for gold investments, each with promotional codes and offers.
Conclusion:
The episode concludes with a call for vigilance and preparation, emphasizing the themes of corruption versus integrity in governance, and the economic implications of current policies.
This report aims to encapsulate the content of the episode without adding bias or personal commentary on the accuracy or credibility of the claims made.
Title: "Trump Narrative Shift: It's Not Left Versus Right, It's About Right Versus Wrong"
Host: Dave
Summary:
The episode of the X22 Report dated February 10, 2025, discusses several themes centered around political, economic, and social issues, with a focus on the actions and policies of Donald Trump's administration. Here are the key points discussed:
Economic and Financial Analysis:
Currency and Debt: The episode mentions Trump's narrative on potentially reducing national debt through exposing fraud in the Treasury and Federal Reserve systems. It suggests that much of the reported debt might be due to fraudulent activities, which could be challenged through audits.
Bitcoin and Gold Investment: There are segments promoting investment in Bitcoin and gold, focusing on security and potential returns. References to Michael Seller's prediction of Bitcoin reaching $10 million per coin are highlighted, along with advice on using crypto Roth IRAs to avoid capital gains tax. The narrative around gold investment mentions a supply decrease in London, attributing this to anticipation of Trump's tariffs.
Federal Reserve Critique: The report criticizes the Federal Reserve for what it describes as criminal activities and fraud, suggesting these have led to currency devaluation over time. Historical data on the declining purchasing power of the dollar since the Federal Reserve's inception in 1913 is cited.
Policy and Political Actions:
Government Efficiency: Trump's administration is depicted as taking measures against government waste, including stopping the minting of pennies due to their production cost exceeding their value, and initiating audits across various government departments like the IRS, Treasury, and Pentagon.
Military and Cultural Policies: Trump's actions to "de-wokenize" military academies by dismissing certain board members and barring gender dysphoria diagnoses from military enlistment are discussed. This is framed as a move towards strengthening the military.
International Relations: The episode mentions Trump's interactions with world leaders, particularly focusing on Ukraine and Russia, with claims that Trump has negotiated terms for peace in Ukraine in exchange for security partnerships and mineral rights.
Judicial and Legislative Moves: There's a discussion on legal challenges to Trump's policies, including judges blocking executive orders, with the implication that these actions will eventually reach the Supreme Court for definitive rulings.
Social Media and Public Opinion:
Media and Public Perception: The report includes segments on how Trump is perceived by the public, citing a poll by CBS where Trump scores high on attributes like toughness and effectiveness. It also notes the White House's new presence on Rumble to promote free speech.
Cultural References: The Super Bowl is mentioned, particularly the reaction to celebrity appearances like Taylor Swift, and the symbolic elements in the halftime performance, suggesting deeper political messages.
Promotional Content:
Advertisements: The episode includes multiple advertisements for services like reliablerxstore.com for medications, mydigitalmoney.com for crypto investments, and x22gold.com for gold investments, each with promotional codes and offers.
Conclusion:
The episode concludes with a call for vigilance and preparation, emphasizing the themes of corruption versus integrity in governance, and the economic implications of current policies.
This report aims to encapsulate the content of the episode without adding bias or personal commentary on the accuracy or credibility of the claims made.
Repost qilingan:X22-Report
11.02.202512:48
X22-3568-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
Trump Narrative Shift, It’s Not Left vs Right, It’s About Right vs Wrong, Game Over – Ep. 3568
February 10, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
Trump Narrative Shift, It’s Not Left vs Right, It’s About Right vs Wrong, Game Over – Ep. 3568
February 10, 2025
Ko'rsatilgan 1 - 24 dan 216
Ko'proq funksiyalarni ochish uchun tizimga kiring.