Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Переглянути

Николаевский Ванёк

Переглянути

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Переглянути

Труха⚡️Україна

Переглянути

Николаевский Ванёк

Переглянути

Victorian Network

Europe Over All.
Pro-White, pro-Christian.
Contact: @victoriaproductions

Рейтинг TGlist

ТипПублічний

Верифікація

Не верифікований

Довіреність

Не надійний

Розташування

МоваІнша

Дата створення каналуГруд 10, 2022

Додано до TGlist

Бер 25, 2025

Я власник каналу

Історія змін

Статистика Телеграм-каналу Victorian Network

Детальніше

Підписників

135

24 год.

10.6%Тиждень

21.9%Місяць

6080%

Індекс цитування

0

Згадок0Репостів на каналах0Згадок на каналах0

Середнє охоплення 1 допису

21

12 год.290%24 год.21

41.7%48 год.55

54.2%

Залученість (ER)

11.11%

Репостів0Коментарів0Реакцій4

Залученість за охопленням (ERR)

26.87%

24 год.0%Тиждень0%Місяць

6.06%

Охоплення 1 рекл. допису

21

1 год.00%1 – 4 год.00%4 - 24 год.628.57%

Детальніше

Під'єднайте нашого бота до каналу і дізнайтеся стать аудиторії цього каналу.

Всього дописів за 24 години

0

Динаміка

Останні публікації в групі "Victorian Network"

Всі дописи

Переслав з:

Kinism

20.04.202519:51

Happy Easter! ♱

Today, we remember the atoning death of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. On the third day, He rose again, conquering sin and death. His work was not to reject creation, as the Gnostics so claim, but to restore and redeem it. In His resurrection, all of creation is reconciled, including our natural bonds with our kin.

☩ He is risen!
He is risen, indeed!

@Kinism

20.04.202511:01

🇩🇪 Happy birthday to one of the most important men to have ever lived — Adolf Hitler!

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

18.04.202519:03

☦️ Early NS Christian Identity

While not being traditional Christian Identity (accepting the OT and NT), it is evident that the völkisch movement embraced many ideas of modern Christian Identity.

We must, however, keep in mind that these quotes focus on the extremely early NSDAP movement and are not final developments in NS Christianity. Still, it is interesting to see how many völkisch authors reflect the truths espoused on this channel.

Relying on the notion that the Israelites and the Jews were “two racially different peoples,”
Fritsch argued in The False God (1911) that the books of the biblical Prophets were the “antisemitic writings of antiquity.”

[Dinter] argued, as Fritsch had, that the Israelites were not Jewish and that the Prophets had been the voice of a subjected race battling “against foreign Jewish oppressors.” All of these writers supported the notion that Jesus was an “Aryan.”

[Liebenfels] supported the notion of Christianity as a “racial cult religion” and interpreted the Bible through a bizarre exegesis which argued that the Old Testament taught the dangers of racial admixture; which depicted Moses as a “Darwinist” and preacher of “racial morality”.

[Schrönghamer-Heimdal] claims that “Israel” was not a Jewish word but rather “ancient Aryan” (urarisch), meaning the people “of the ‘eternal Light-spirit,’ that is, the ‘people of God,’ the ‘chosen people’!” These chosen people “are and were, however, not the Jews,” but rather “the Aryan people”: “The Aryans, Arameans, Armanen, Germanic tribes are the predecessors and successors of Christ, the actual Christians who cling to the eternal Light-spirit.”

[Hitler] stated that there was a fundamental “division” between the “northern Israelite tribes” and the “nomadic” Jews “of the tribe of Judah and Caleb.” He claimed that this division had first been overcome by King David through the “cult of the god Yahweh,” and that “the Jews” had killed off the “original tribes in Palestine.”

[In 1922, Hitler] argued that Christianity was racially specific: “The Christian religion is created only for the Aryans; for other peoples it is absurd.” Shortly thereafter, he argued that “positive Christianity” meant “the sword with its grip in the shape of a cross,” not the religion that “asked one to turn the other cheek.”

— Koehne, Samuel. “Were the National Socialists a Völkisch Party? Paganism, Christianity, and the Nazi Christmas.”

It is possible, in my opinion, that Hitler made certain concessions in regards to Christianity (i.e. seeing parts of it as Jewish) to earn the support of the völkisch movement.

While there may be some things in early NS Christianity that seem anti-Christian (read the paper, I didn't cover them), overall Hitler's intention seemed to be to maintain Christianity as the status-quo no matter how he needed to justify it to himself or the movement at large.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

17.04.202519:04

Your Godfather, Hitler?
📸 Hitler With Young Children (1936)

According to an issue of Neues Volk, a magazine ran by the NSDAP's Office of Racial Policy, Adolf Hitler could become your godfather! The requirements were as follows:

• The family has to be genetically healthy
• Only after the seventh living son (or the ninth living child) will godfathership be considered
• The parents have to have a strong conviction in National Socialism

Though there were no guaranteed benefits from Hitler becoming the godfather of a child, government agencies would look out for the child and their life would be made easy. There was also a chance the Führer would give monetary support.

Source: Calvin University

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

16.04.202519:05

The European Youth Association
📇 Postcard for the European Youth Association (1942)

The European Youth Association, or as it was known in German, "Europäischen Jugendverband", was founded in 1942 in Vienna as part of an initiative to spread National Socialism all across Europe. It was a cultural exchange for the Axis and included many countries such as Italy, Spain, Denmark, Romania, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, etc.

Approximately 300 young leaders from across Europe met in Vienna, where Baldur von Schirach and Renato Ricci were proclaimed honorary presidents, while Artur Axmann and Aldo Vidussoni were effective presidents. Female leaders included Germany's Jutta Rüdiger, Italy's Penelope Testa and Spain's Mary Pilar Primo de Rivera.

Sadly, as the war turned for the worse, the European Youth Association's importance was lessened until it eventually fizzled out and died with the Third Reich.

Sources: German Article, German Interview

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

15.04.202518:38

☦️ USSR Loved Christ Are Jeets?

First, much of their proof comes from an article by the Boris Yeltsin Presidential Library. A literal Russian state owned website. Not a great start.

Then they show some Discord screenshots of quotes from a book roughly translated as "The Executioners of St. Luke. Reflections on the Centenary of the October 1917 Revolution." which are supposed to show Lenin and Stalin supporting Christianity. The problems:

1. The link given (https://books.google.co.in/books?id=nadxDwAAQBAJ&pg=512#v=onepage&q&f=false) is from INDIA. ".co.in" is an Indian website ending. These guys are actual jeets?

2. See where it says &pg=512? That's to try and send you to page 512 of the book. But the book does not allow itself to be searched through by page. Try it.

3. The book only has 480 pages. How can their proof be sending us to page 512?

4. Lenin "ending" persecution on the Church directly contradicts his own opinion and the historical record.

5. If we translate the book's synopsis, it is actually clearly against communism.

They provide cropped quotes from the Wikipedia page on the League of Militant Atheists. In a very Jewish manner, they do not show the full context of why Stalin disbanded it, which was to gain war support. Earlier in the LMG's history, Stalin ordered 5 year plan in 1932 to "eliminate the Church and its influence in the USSR".

Also, that quote about Stalin and the Catholic Church is unsourced and incredibly neutral in language.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

15.04.202517:32

☦️ Engels Did Not Like Christianity

In another pathetic attempt by the drooling retards at "USSR Loved Christ", they have tried to paint Engels as supportive of Christianity. When you look at the historical record, however, this is far from the case. Let me put this firmly to rest.

"We have seen to it that half the rules-drafting committee in Cologne consists of our own people; in Elberfeld, at least one of them was on it and, with the help of the rationalists, we succeeded at two meetings in thoroughly trouncing the pious; by a huge majority, everything Christian was banned from the rules."

— Engels to Marx (1844)

"Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

— Marx & Engels, Communist Manifesto (1847)

"[C]ommunism is the stage of historical development which makes all existing religions superfluous and brings about their disappearance."

— Engels, Principles of Communism (1847)

"...while they [Americans] did not bring over any medieval institutions from Europe they did bring over masses of medieval traditions, religion, English common (feudal) law, superstition, spiritualism, in short every kind of imbecility which was not directly harmful to business and which is now very serviceable for making the masses stupid"

— Engels to Sorge (1886)

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

14.04.202521:31

☦️ Was Lot a "Holy" Man? II

I wanted to get the full story out of the way so we can establish a few things:

1. Lot was not called "holy" but rather righteous and tormented by the actions of those in Sodom (2 Pet. 2:8)
2. Lot's daughters were not children, nobody can determine their age because it isn't stated
3. God did not approve of the incest

Abraham, because Lot is his nephew, keeps pleading with God over and over to spare the city. He keeps bargaining and eventually God agrees that if there are even ten righteous people in Sodom, He will not destroy it (Gen. 18:22-33). But ultimately, there aren't.

We can infer from this then that the only righteous people left in Sodom were Lot and his family, and that was in comparison to the Sodomites, because no other "righteous" people existed there.

As for the children born of this incestuous relationship (Moabites, Ammonites), they were incredibly hated by God and a thorn in the side of the Israelites. The Moabites were cursed (Isa. 16:6-14; Jer. 48; Ezk. 25:8-11), they lead the Israelites into idolatry and sexual immorality (Num. 25:1-3), were defeated by David (2 Sam. 8:2) and so on. The same thing goes for Ammonites.

Lastly, something particularly damning is the exclusion of Moabites and Ammonites forever (Neh. 13:1-3).

In conclusion, Lot was only righteous as far as Sodom's standards were. Him and his family's sense of morality and judgement were corrupted by the Sodomites. Nowhere is he called a holy man though we should definitely learn from his story.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

14.04.202521:31

☦️ Was Lot a "Holy" Man?
🖼 Lot and his Daughters leaving Sodom (1615)

A rarer but still used example of the supposed Jewishness of the Old Testament is the story of Lot and his daughters.

In Genesis 19, we find two angels had visited Lot in Sodom (Gen. 19:1) and that the corrupt men of Sodom came to rape the angels or possibly what they just viewed to be two men (Gen 19:4-5). So Lot offers up his daughters trying to appease the mob but the men become more enraged as a result (Gen. 19:8-11).

The angels tell Lot to take his family and leave as they are about to destroy Sodom (Gen. 19:12-13). Lot's wife famously becomes a pillar of salt for looking back at Sodom (Gen. 19:26) and then Lot takes himself and his daughters into a cave (Gen. 19:30) where they convince him to drink wine and, believing he is the only man left on Earth, have sex with him (Gen. 19:33-38).

The entire story sucks, obviously, so why was Lot called righteous (2 Pet. 2:7-9)?

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

07.04.202519:05

☦️ The Councils of Toledo II

In A.D. 654, the now completed Visigothic Code was a set of laws that highly oppressed Jews[4].

Jews were prevented from practicing many things according to their custom
such as Passover, marriage, dividing food into clean and unclean, practicing circumcision, etc. They were unable to defend their religion against attacks from Christians, unable to read books against Christianity, unable to escape baptism for themselves or their children, and were given a book detailing the crimes of their faith. If a Jew was caught reading a book that was against Christianity, he could either have his head shaved or be lashed 100 times. Priests and judges who neglected properly enforcing laws against Jews were excommunicated for 3-6 months and fined.

The succeeding councils reaffirmed this until the Seventeenth Council of Toledo in A.D. 694 where things got harsher[5].

King Egica announced he had learned of a conspiracy between Spanish and North African Jews to assist the Muslim armies in conquering Iberia. Thus, all Jews other than those residing in Narbonensis were to be made slaves and given to Christian masters in different parts of the kingdom who were to try and convert them fully to Christianity. Their property was to be confiscated and any children under the age of seven were taken from their parents.

In A.D. 711, General Tariq ibn Zayid took Toledo. It was said that, because of the intense discrimination against Jews, that the Jews opened the gates of Toledo for the Moors[6]. And indeed, Jews were assigned leadership roles in governing, investment and policymaking after the Muslim conquest. This time became known as the Golden Age (for Jews) in Spain[6].

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

07.04.202519:05

☦️ The Councils of Toledo
🖼 Third Council of Toledo (1862)

The first two Catholic councils of Toledo imply there was a lack of Jews as there is no mention. The Third Council in A.D. 589 stated[1]:

"[We forbid] Jews to have Christian wives, concubines, or slaves, [order] the children of such unions to be baptized, and [disqualify] Jews from any office in which they might have to punish Christians. Christian slaves whom they had circumcised, or made to share in their rites, [are] ipso facto freed."

This would be the first of many oppressive councils to come. In between these councils, King Sisebut forced his Jewish subjects to convert in A.D. 612[2]. In A.D. 633, the Fourth Council of Toledo declared that[3]:

Children of Jews were to be sent to monasteries or Christian men or women to worship Christianity
. Jews were also not allowed to hold public office, hold Christian slaves or marry Christian women. Circumcision was seen as an abominable practice.

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? IV
🖼 Eos and Memnon (King of Ethiopia) (BC 490-480~)
🖼 Achilles kills Memnon (BC ?)

So what am I getting at here? To have burnt skin implies a previous state of having light skin. Otherwise, the Greeks could've used the other words they had to describe the swarthiness or darkness of Aethiopians.

While I will freely admit there is nothing wholly concrete, the examples of White Aethiopians going extinct and becoming our modern African Ethiopians may simply be an example of losing racial purity over time. Ham's descendants are thought to have inhabited Egypt and Africa (Psa. 78:51; 105:23; 105:27; 106:22; 1 Chr. 4:40). Inevitably, if they were racially pure at one point, they are all mixed by now. This idea is a likely answer to the Ethiopian Church question.

For the Eunuch in Acts, read this article.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? III
🖼 King Ezana Mural, Ura Kidane Mehret (AD 1500~?)

Modern scholarship does not like this theory[1]. Yet I believe we can get to the bottom of this objectively. Cepheus, the ancient Ethiopian king in the last post, was called "Iasid Cepheus" because of his Argive or Greek ancestry[2]. We have a mid-first century AD document detailing the Aksumite rulers' Hellenization and adoption of Greek. This would later be used heavily in their coinage[3].

Ezana's son, Mehadeyis, might've been mentioned twice in comparison to Ares and Dionysus by Nonnus[4]. And Ezana, before converting, worshipped parallel Aksumite-Greek gods[5].

The church there would be founded on Alexandrian church practices, translating the Bible from Greek into Ge'ez[6][7]. And we shouldn't forget that the word Aethiopian comes from the words αἴθω and ὤψ, literally meaning to burn in the face[8]. Which is interesting since Greek has other words for dark-skinned or black[9][10].

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? II
🖼 Cepheus, King of Ethiopia, (BC 500~)

We also have ancient accounts of the two races living in Ethiopia.

Those who dwell along the river, are black in colour and have flat noses and woolly hair... they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast... speaking as they do with a
shrill voice...
Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 3:8.1-3 (BC 60-30~)

On those shores washed by the Libyan Sea... are found the Libyan Aegyptians, the
White Aethiopians...
Pomponius Mela, Chorographia 2:1.23 (AD 43~)

[...] the Æthiopians are divided into two races... the Troglodytæ make excavations in the earth... for dwellings... serpents is their food; they have no articulate voice, but only utter a kind of squeaking noise...
Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5:8 (AD 77-79~)

But what evidence is there, if any, that this is all true?

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia?
🖼 Mural, Menelik I, Axum, Ethiopia (AD 4th century~)

Often to discredit Christian Identity, opponents will mention the Ethiopian Church and King Ezana's conversion of Ethiopia into a Christian country. This, they say, proves that early Christianity was multiracial. What if I told you it's not so simple?

In the Kebra Nagast (though a medieval document), the Ethiopian royalty claimed descent from King Solomon and Queen Sheba, with the first king of Ethiopia being Menelik I (1000 BC~).

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

Всі дописи

Нічого не знайдено 😢

Детальніше

Рекорди

21.04.202523:59

135Підписників

30.12.202423:59

0Індекс цитування

26.03.202523:59

189Охоплення 1 допису

28.03.202523:59

102Охоп рекл. допису

16.04.202523:59

24.14%ER

26.03.202523:59

227.71%ERR

Розвиток

Детальніше

Підписників

Індекс цитування

Охоплення 1 допису

Охоп рекл. допису

ERR

Детальніше

Популярні публікації Victorian Network

Всі дописи

Переслав з:

Kinism

20.04.202519:51

15.04.202518:38

18.04.202519:03

[Dinter] argued, as Fritsch had, that the Israelites were not Jewish and that the Prophets had been the voice of a subjected race battling “against foreign Jewish oppressors.” All of these writers supported the notion that Jesus was an “Aryan.”

[Liebenfels] supported the notion of Christianity as a “racial cult religion” and interpreted the Bible through a bizarre exegesis which argued that the Old Testament taught the dangers of racial admixture; which depicted Moses as a “Darwinist” and preacher of “racial morality”.

[Schrönghamer-Heimdal] claims that “Israel” was not a Jewish word but rather “ancient Aryan” (urarisch), meaning the people “of the ‘eternal Light-spirit,’ that is, the ‘people of God,’ the ‘chosen people’!” These chosen people “are and were, however, not the Jews,” but rather “the Aryan people”: “The Aryans, Arameans, Armanen, Germanic tribes are the predecessors and successors of Christ, the actual Christians who cling to the eternal Light-spirit.”

[Hitler] stated that there was a fundamental “division” between the “northern Israelite tribes” and the “nomadic” Jews “of the tribe of Judah and Caleb.” He claimed that this division had first been overcome by King David through the “cult of the god Yahweh,” and that “the Jews” had killed off the “original tribes in Palestine.”

[In 1922, Hitler] argued that Christianity was racially specific: “The Christian religion is created only for the Aryans; for other peoples it is absurd.” Shortly thereafter, he argued that “positive Christianity” meant “the sword with its grip in the shape of a cross,” not the religion that “asked one to turn the other cheek.”

Переслав з:

European Canvas

01.04.202501:55

Patrologia Graeca on Christ:

"...And he was very handsome in appearance, as Poplicia said. A beautiful form before the sons of men: He was six feet tall, with blond hair, he had a dirty beard and long hair: he never used a razor it ascended upon his head, nor the hand of a man."

Credit to @BiblicalPrejudice

🖼 Christ in Gethsemane (1890)
👨‍🎨 Johann Michael Ferdinand Heinrich Hofmann
📣 @eurocanvas

02.04.202519:01

16.04.202519:05

29.03.202519:02

☦️ Rabbis as a Source?

Do I really need to say much here? Christianity Exposed is using a rabbi, who essentially admits to wanting to use Christian naivety to protect Israel. How is that evidence of Christianity preserving Israel?

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

[...] the Æthiopians are divided into two races... the Troglodytæ make excavations in the earth... for dwellings... serpents is their food; they have no articulate voice, but only utter a kind of squeaking noise...
Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5:8 (AD 77-79~)

But what evidence is there, if any, that this is all true?

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

22.03.202519:06

☦️ Maimonides Was Coping

This is getting ridiculous. Immediately, there's seething from Maimonides about Christ in the same chapter that CE quotes:

One should not presume that the Messianic king must work miracles and wonders
, bring about new phenomena in the world, resurrect the dead, or perform other similar deeds. This is definitely not true.
Jesus of Nazareth who aspired to be the Mashiach
and was executed by the court was also alluded to in Daniel's prophecies, as [Daniel] 11:14 states: "The vulgar among your people shall exalt themselves in an attempt to fulfill the vision, but they shall stumble."
Can there be a greater stumbling block than Christianity?
All the prophets spoke of Mashiach as the redeemer of Israel and their savior who would gather their dispersed and strengthen their observance of the mitzvot. In contrast, Christianity caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.

Only then does he say what CE quoted. It hardly seems like praise with this new context but rather a way to cope. In fact, the majority of this source is based on what kings should do, as evident by the title "The Laws of Kings and Their Wars" or "Melachim uMilchamot".

So actually, the "most influential Jewish philosopher and Torah scholar of all time" called Christianity a stumbling block, said it caused Jews to be slain by the sword and the majority of the world to err.

Not only is this from CE's source, it's some of the preceding paragraphs before his quote, meaning he overlooked this and hoped that nobody would notice.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

07.04.202519:05

"[We forbid] Jews to have Christian wives, concubines, or slaves, [order] the children of such unions to be baptized, and [disqualify] Jews from any office in which they might have to punish Christians. Christian slaves whom they had circumcised, or made to share in their rites, [are] ipso facto freed."

27.03.202519:04

☦️ Jesus Did Not Teach From the Talmud

1. There are not four cups of wine. Nothing in the cited verses says that. Jesus gives the bread and wine a new meaning, that of the Eucharist (Luke 22:14-23).

2. Actually, Christ was wondering why the Jews were attacking him (John 7:1) for healing a man on the Sabbath (John 5:1-9) when they are fine with circumcision on the Sabbath (Lev. 12:3). While the Talmud does speak on circumcision on the Sabbath, it first comes from Leviticus. Also, Jesus said the Sabbath was made for man and challenged the Pharisee's legalistic interpretation of it (Mark 2:23-27).

3. Sotah 16d does not exist and in the contents of both the Sotah (16a-16b) and Mishnah Sotah (doesn't even have 16 chapters), saliva or spittle is not mentioned. The only rabbi in this conversation in the Bava Batra, which does mention saliva as a method of curing blindness, lived from AD 80 to AD 110.

4. Bava Kamma 9:29 does not exist, nor does this quote exist in Bava Kamma 9a or 9b. 9a stops at 9a.21 and 9b stops at 9b.18. Not to mention both chapters are about property.

5. All of the rabbis in this conversation from Pirkei Avot 3 were born after Christ. R. Hanina (who initiates this discussion) is close, being born in AD 40~, but R. Shimon, Hananiah, Nehunia and Halafta were all born long after Christ. All of the justifications given for their opinions are from the Old Testament.

6. First, Matthew 25 is a little bit more prophetical than it is a literal teaching. Still, there are several parallels to Matt. 25:44 within the OT. Like Ezek. 16:49; Isa. 58:6-7; Prov. 21:13.

7. Betzah 17 does not say the Sabbath was made for man like in Mark 2:27. It's ironically a discussion on how best to ignore Sabbatical laws. I won't make a list since there are so many, but again, all of the rabbis mentioned within Betzah 17a-17b are far after Christ. Shimon b. Menasya was born after Christ, so Christ could not have been quoting him. The only thing that's close is that in Shabbat 128a, Shimon ben Gamaliel (BC 10-AD 70) did talk about bundles and the Sabbath, but it's unclear how important he was before AD 50, as only then did he become head of the Sanhedrin.

8. Rabbi Akiva was born far after Christ.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

02.04.202519:01

07.04.202519:05

King Egica announced he had learned of a conspiracy between Spanish and North African Jews to assist the Muslim armies in conquering Iberia. Thus, all Jews other than those residing in Narbonensis were to be made slaves and given to Christian masters in different parts of the kingdom who were to try and convert them fully to Christianity. Their property was to be confiscated and any children under the age of seven were taken from their parents.

25.03.202520:36

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤

Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.