National Socialist World
23.04.202501:00
These are the transcripts of the trial of Augustus Invictus in Charlottesville from October. The trial was a farce of justice. It concerned the "tiki torch march" at the University of Virginia in August of 2017. Included are some transcripts of other motions hearings.
Background: The march was supposed to be secret. Ultra-privileged University of Virginia Antifa goons spied on, and stalked the march. Antifa started some fights. They lost. So they turned to their professors to come up with a revenge-plan. UVA's Law School pushed for years to find something, anything to charge people with. They stacked the prosecutor's office with their people. The prosecutor issued "secret indictments". People were randomly arrested for years.
One of prosecutor Hingeley's most outrageous conflicts-of-interest was that his campaign was funded by billionaire Sonjia Smith whose daughter, Kendall Bills, was with Antifa at Unite the Right the next day. Somehow he was allowed to stay on the Augustus case, and many others.
At a different trial earlier last year, corrupt prosecutor Hingeley's case was blown out of the water. Unlike at Augustus Invictus' trial though, Hingeley and his UVA cronies were not allowed to participate, and a new judge was selected. It was telling, that because the trial was conducted outside ultra-corrupt Charlottesville, the jury failed to convict and the judge later dismissed the case.
This post doesn't even detail half of the outrageous and disgusting deeds of UVA and its helpers in the judicial establishment. These people are liars, bullies and careerists. Typical products of Jewish Democracy.
The latest news, Hingeley says he's done bringing prosecutions for now. What he should be doing is apologizing and offering himself up for investigation. We'll get there.
Background: The march was supposed to be secret. Ultra-privileged University of Virginia Antifa goons spied on, and stalked the march. Antifa started some fights. They lost. So they turned to their professors to come up with a revenge-plan. UVA's Law School pushed for years to find something, anything to charge people with. They stacked the prosecutor's office with their people. The prosecutor issued "secret indictments". People were randomly arrested for years.
One of prosecutor Hingeley's most outrageous conflicts-of-interest was that his campaign was funded by billionaire Sonjia Smith whose daughter, Kendall Bills, was with Antifa at Unite the Right the next day. Somehow he was allowed to stay on the Augustus case, and many others.
At a different trial earlier last year, corrupt prosecutor Hingeley's case was blown out of the water. Unlike at Augustus Invictus' trial though, Hingeley and his UVA cronies were not allowed to participate, and a new judge was selected. It was telling, that because the trial was conducted outside ultra-corrupt Charlottesville, the jury failed to convict and the judge later dismissed the case.
This post doesn't even detail half of the outrageous and disgusting deeds of UVA and its helpers in the judicial establishment. These people are liars, bullies and careerists. Typical products of Jewish Democracy.
The latest news, Hingeley says he's done bringing prosecutions for now. What he should be doing is apologizing and offering himself up for investigation. We'll get there.
24.03.202500:57
My book "Sieg Heil: German for Beginners" is back in stock!
What more fun way to learn a great European culture-language? No political correctness. No apologies. Just total Hitler.
Get your copy today, only from Invisible Empire Publishing!
https://www.invisibleempirepublishing.com/books-2/pre-order-sieg-heil-german-for-beginners-by-gregory-conte/
What more fun way to learn a great European culture-language? No political correctness. No apologies. Just total Hitler.
Get your copy today, only from Invisible Empire Publishing!
https://www.invisibleempirepublishing.com/books-2/pre-order-sieg-heil-german-for-beginners-by-gregory-conte/
22.03.202519:36
"Might makes right" is a vile lie. A cartoonish perversion of ethics.
If "might is right", on what moral basis do we oppose the Jewish dominance of our whole civilization? Does Andrew Taint believe that tyrannies are impossible?
Right is right regardless of who happens to be in power.
If "might is right", on what moral basis do we oppose the Jewish dominance of our whole civilization? Does Andrew Taint believe that tyrannies are impossible?
Right is right regardless of who happens to be in power.
23.02.202523:16
Pick one, faggot
04.02.202504:31
Video from back when Panamanian leaders had some self-respect...
It would be much more just if the Judeo-US Empire came right out and said "yeah, we own you".
Instead, they put on this whole pretense of letting Latin America and Europe and wherever else run themselves.
Jews want all of the profit, none of the responsibility.
It would be much more just if the Judeo-US Empire came right out and said "yeah, we own you".
Instead, they put on this whole pretense of letting Latin America and Europe and wherever else run themselves.
Jews want all of the profit, none of the responsibility.
11.01.202517:30
Twitter-clerics are calling Orthodoxy "unamerican".
As a National Socialist, I don't take a side. I didn't see priests of any denomination standing up against the greatest evil of our day: institutional Jewish power. How serious is their faith if it does not compel them to acts of sacrifice in the service of justice?
To look at it politically: Orthodoxy and traditionalist Catholicism are gaining at the expense of protestantism because people see them as morally stronger. It has nothing to do with which denomination is more American. Is divine truth dependent on that the founding fathers thought?
ZOG doesn't want too many people to become Orthodox for two reasons 1) Russia is Orthodox 2) ZOG does not want Americans making common cause with middle eastern Christians in light of Israeli crimes.
If the protestant churches want to win back adherents, they should do what Martin Luther did and stand up to corrupt institutions and call out the Jews.
As a National Socialist, I don't take a side. I didn't see priests of any denomination standing up against the greatest evil of our day: institutional Jewish power. How serious is their faith if it does not compel them to acts of sacrifice in the service of justice?
To look at it politically: Orthodoxy and traditionalist Catholicism are gaining at the expense of protestantism because people see them as morally stronger. It has nothing to do with which denomination is more American. Is divine truth dependent on that the founding fathers thought?
ZOG doesn't want too many people to become Orthodox for two reasons 1) Russia is Orthodox 2) ZOG does not want Americans making common cause with middle eastern Christians in light of Israeli crimes.
If the protestant churches want to win back adherents, they should do what Martin Luther did and stand up to corrupt institutions and call out the Jews.
18.04.202523:31
Prussian Socialism Episode 46: Rise and Fall of Imperial Japan featuring Christian Secor
From Samurais to Kamikazes, banzai-charges to ritualized suicide and months-long anime shows, the Japanese are known for one thing: Being really, really intense about everything.
So of course, when the Western Great Powers began encroaching in East Asia, the Japanese were spurred into a feverish drive to catch up everywhere... in technology, in science, in organization and above all, in war.
After whooping the Russians, the Chinese, the British, and throwing the Americans out of the Philippines, their furious expansion was stopped and rolled back only by America's massive material power. The Japanese got their once-in-a-millennium chance to prove themselves the most hard-core people in all of history. Did they succeed?
Join Gregory Conte and January Sixer Christian Secor as we discuss Western Civilization's most explosive rival.
Check out Christian's book "The American Regime" from Antelope Hill Publishing
and Christian's articles at Counter Currents
And don't forget to get Greg's book "SIEG HEIL: German for Beginners" from Invisible Empire Publishing
From Samurais to Kamikazes, banzai-charges to ritualized suicide and months-long anime shows, the Japanese are known for one thing: Being really, really intense about everything.
So of course, when the Western Great Powers began encroaching in East Asia, the Japanese were spurred into a feverish drive to catch up everywhere... in technology, in science, in organization and above all, in war.
After whooping the Russians, the Chinese, the British, and throwing the Americans out of the Philippines, their furious expansion was stopped and rolled back only by America's massive material power. The Japanese got their once-in-a-millennium chance to prove themselves the most hard-core people in all of history. Did they succeed?
Join Gregory Conte and January Sixer Christian Secor as we discuss Western Civilization's most explosive rival.
Check out Christian's book "The American Regime" from Antelope Hill Publishing
and Christian's articles at Counter Currents
And don't forget to get Greg's book "SIEG HEIL: German for Beginners" from Invisible Empire Publishing
Переслав з:
Daniel Zakal's Art Gallery
23.03.202517:19
Chauvinism Is Not National Socialism — Nor Is It Life Affirming
There is a critical misunderstanding — often repeated by both detractors and misguided advocates — that chauvinism is an inherent part of National Socialism. This is false. National Socialism, when properly understood through the lens of the Life Affirming Principle, is rooted in preservation, order, discipline, and reverence for one’s people — not in arrogant superiority or the degradation of others.
Chauvinism is a life-destroying force. It is driven by insecurity, by a need to feel “better than” others to justify one’s identity. But a healthy identity — a strong people — does not require comparison. You preserve what is yours not because it is superior to others, but because it is yours. It is the vessel of your ancestors, the memory of your bloodline, and the soul of your culture. That alone is worth defending.
Now, as Nathan Damigo rightly pointed out, critiques like those from Keith Woods fall apart under scrutiny. Woods condemns ethno-nationalist chauvinism, but then offers no viable framework to stop it from occurring in any nationalist state. If, as Woods implies, nationalism naturally devolves into chauvinism, then his argument isn’t really against German National Socialism — it’s against nationalism itself. But that position is intellectually dishonest and logically incoherent.
“If the German National Socialists were so bad, what would stop ethnic chauvinism from developing again in any nationalist country?” — Damigo
The answer is simple: principle. Specifically, the Life Affirming Principle.
This principle serves as the moral firewall that Woods cannot provide. It states that all decisions — whether in state policy, culture, education, or governance — must serve the preservation and elevation of life, not its destruction. That includes the lives of your own people, your culture, your future — but it also includes avoiding needless conflict, hostility, and hatred toward others.
National Socialism guided by this principle becomes strong, disciplined nationalism without arrogance. It becomes a worldview based on self-improvement, growth, duty, and biological and spiritual alignment with life itself — not domination for its own sake.
“If you do not feel the ways of your ethnic group are superior to others, then what is the point of preserving it?”
This question reveals a tragic misunderstanding. It implies the only justification for preservation is superiority. But you do not protect your family, your people, or your land because it is “better” than someone else’s — you protect it because it is yours, and it is right to do so. That is honor. That is dignity. That is life-affirming.
Nationalism without chauvinism is not only possible — it is morally superior. It requires a deeper connection to heritage, land, and destiny. It says: “I will build my people up, I will defend them, I will love them — not because others are worthless, but because my own are priceless.”
Chauvinism is rooted in ego; National Socialism is rooted in duty.
So no, we do not need chauvinism to justify nationalism. That is the logic of the insecure. We need only the Life Affirming Principle, and a deep connection to our people, to justify standing for their survival and flourishing. And if a nationalist movement strays into chauvinism, it is not because nationalism is flawed — it is because that movement lacked principle from the start.
There is a critical misunderstanding — often repeated by both detractors and misguided advocates — that chauvinism is an inherent part of National Socialism. This is false. National Socialism, when properly understood through the lens of the Life Affirming Principle, is rooted in preservation, order, discipline, and reverence for one’s people — not in arrogant superiority or the degradation of others.
Chauvinism is a life-destroying force. It is driven by insecurity, by a need to feel “better than” others to justify one’s identity. But a healthy identity — a strong people — does not require comparison. You preserve what is yours not because it is superior to others, but because it is yours. It is the vessel of your ancestors, the memory of your bloodline, and the soul of your culture. That alone is worth defending.
Now, as Nathan Damigo rightly pointed out, critiques like those from Keith Woods fall apart under scrutiny. Woods condemns ethno-nationalist chauvinism, but then offers no viable framework to stop it from occurring in any nationalist state. If, as Woods implies, nationalism naturally devolves into chauvinism, then his argument isn’t really against German National Socialism — it’s against nationalism itself. But that position is intellectually dishonest and logically incoherent.
“If the German National Socialists were so bad, what would stop ethnic chauvinism from developing again in any nationalist country?” — Damigo
The answer is simple: principle. Specifically, the Life Affirming Principle.
This principle serves as the moral firewall that Woods cannot provide. It states that all decisions — whether in state policy, culture, education, or governance — must serve the preservation and elevation of life, not its destruction. That includes the lives of your own people, your culture, your future — but it also includes avoiding needless conflict, hostility, and hatred toward others.
National Socialism guided by this principle becomes strong, disciplined nationalism without arrogance. It becomes a worldview based on self-improvement, growth, duty, and biological and spiritual alignment with life itself — not domination for its own sake.
“If you do not feel the ways of your ethnic group are superior to others, then what is the point of preserving it?”
This question reveals a tragic misunderstanding. It implies the only justification for preservation is superiority. But you do not protect your family, your people, or your land because it is “better” than someone else’s — you protect it because it is yours, and it is right to do so. That is honor. That is dignity. That is life-affirming.
Nationalism without chauvinism is not only possible — it is morally superior. It requires a deeper connection to heritage, land, and destiny. It says: “I will build my people up, I will defend them, I will love them — not because others are worthless, but because my own are priceless.”
Chauvinism is rooted in ego; National Socialism is rooted in duty.
So no, we do not need chauvinism to justify nationalism. That is the logic of the insecure. We need only the Life Affirming Principle, and a deep connection to our people, to justify standing for their survival and flourishing. And if a nationalist movement strays into chauvinism, it is not because nationalism is flawed — it is because that movement lacked principle from the start.
21.03.202520:06
In an outrageous and insulting article, a certain writer not only attacked Adolf Hitler, but claimed to be a National Socialist while doing so.
Preposterous. A basic violation of National Socialist principles.
"To renounce doing homage to a great spirit means the loss of an immense strength which emanates from the names of all great men and women."
(Mein Kampf p. 352 trans. Mannheim)
Read my righteous counter-attack in defense of Hitler's reputation, only on The Occidental Observer!
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/03/21/hitler-is-national-socialism-and-national-socialism-is-hitler/
Preposterous. A basic violation of National Socialist principles.
"To renounce doing homage to a great spirit means the loss of an immense strength which emanates from the names of all great men and women."
(Mein Kampf p. 352 trans. Mannheim)
Read my righteous counter-attack in defense of Hitler's reputation, only on The Occidental Observer!
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/03/21/hitler-is-national-socialism-and-national-socialism-is-hitler/
18.02.202503:41
Typical divide-and-conquer bullshit. Jew-puppet JD Vance and the bourgeois media are attacking the Germans over the technicalities of their legal system.
"No free speech wah wah wah".
German speech laws work fine when there is a moral, native national-leadership. They didn't have "free speech" under Hitler or during the Kaiserreich either.
"Free speech" is a peculiarity of American law because of an 18th century lawyer-argument. It isn't central to our culture, and it shouldn't be central to your identity.
The important fact is that the Germans aren't free because they're a bitch-state of international Jewish finance. Just like us, Britain, France and every other White Western country.
ZOG is pushing jingoistic petit nationalism right now because it's useful to them. "Annex Canada" "Europoors don't have 1776" "War with Greenland" it's all horseshit distractions.
The Jews are in power, they need to be held accountable.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1891302425190863347
"No free speech wah wah wah".
German speech laws work fine when there is a moral, native national-leadership. They didn't have "free speech" under Hitler or during the Kaiserreich either.
"Free speech" is a peculiarity of American law because of an 18th century lawyer-argument. It isn't central to our culture, and it shouldn't be central to your identity.
The important fact is that the Germans aren't free because they're a bitch-state of international Jewish finance. Just like us, Britain, France and every other White Western country.
ZOG is pushing jingoistic petit nationalism right now because it's useful to them. "Annex Canada" "Europoors don't have 1776" "War with Greenland" it's all horseshit distractions.
The Jews are in power, they need to be held accountable.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1891302425190863347
26.01.202514:37
US counterinsurgency field manual 2014. LOL.
You can read the whole thing as an FBI strategy handbook if you just make a few word-substitutions:
For "insurgent" read "pro-White"
For "US forces" read "glowies"
For "host-nation" read "state and local authorities"
The government calls you a "DMV" "domestic violent (sic) extremist" in their internal paperwork. It stands to reason that they apply all of this doctrine to you
You can read the whole thing as an FBI strategy handbook if you just make a few word-substitutions:
For "insurgent" read "pro-White"
For "US forces" read "glowies"
For "host-nation" read "state and local authorities"
The government calls you a "DMV" "domestic violent (sic) extremist" in their internal paperwork. It stands to reason that they apply all of this doctrine to you
Переслав з:
Justice Report
01.01.202523:13
🚨Exclusive: A violent 'Antifa' who attempted to crush skulls with a metal pipe during 2017's infamous Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, has been positively identified.
The individual is currently facing charges of attempted knife murder in Bloomington, Indiana seven years later, providing further insight into the nature of Cville counter-protestors who have largely dodged accountability for their crimes.
📰 Read Here: https://justicereport.news/2025/01/01/exclusive-violent-cville-antifa-charged-with-attempted-knife-murder/
For more #Exclusives, subscribe to @justicereport
Website | Odysee | Substack | X/Twitter | Gab
The individual is currently facing charges of attempted knife murder in Bloomington, Indiana seven years later, providing further insight into the nature of Cville counter-protestors who have largely dodged accountability for their crimes.
📰 Read Here: https://justicereport.news/2025/01/01/exclusive-violent-cville-antifa-charged-with-attempted-knife-murder/
For more #Exclusives, subscribe to @justicereport
Website | Odysee | Substack | X/Twitter | Gab
27.03.202521:10
23.03.202515:15
In the 1930s, there was no possibility of a continued balance-of-power among the European states like that of 1815-1914. Every country had to align itself with either Germany or under the sway of International Jewish Finance.
For Poland then, the options were: ally with Britain or Germany. Pilsudski understood this and signed a treaty with Hitler. But in 1939 Poland’s selfish nationalist leaders switched to Britain. They fell for the siren-song of pettit-nationalism based on a childish hope for some sort of eternal balance-of-powers. No doubt they hoped that, by playing Germany and Britain off against each other, they could do as they pleased with the ethnic Germans within their borders.
They fucked around and found out.
The Polish people's tragic fate since 1939 was thus the direct result of its leaders’ idiotic pettit-nationalism. If Poland’s 1939 leaders had been politically realistic like Pilsudski, they would have realized that their best choice was an alliance on honorable terms with Germany.
And of course, Churchill and his Jew-masters sold Poland out. Britain and France declared war on Germany “for Poland” but really for International Jewish Finance. After the war, Poland got occupied by the Soviets. Now, Poland is another NATO bitch-state whose leaders will take as many “refugees” and as much faggotry as Washington tells them to.
“Nationalism” of the Keith Woods brand is a childish delusion. There is no possibility today of an 1815-style Concert of Nations. Europe-America has become one giant polity. The only question is, is it to be ruled by Whites or Jews?
As a Nazi, I would prefer White-rule. How about you?
For Poland then, the options were: ally with Britain or Germany. Pilsudski understood this and signed a treaty with Hitler. But in 1939 Poland’s selfish nationalist leaders switched to Britain. They fell for the siren-song of pettit-nationalism based on a childish hope for some sort of eternal balance-of-powers. No doubt they hoped that, by playing Germany and Britain off against each other, they could do as they pleased with the ethnic Germans within their borders.
They fucked around and found out.
The Polish people's tragic fate since 1939 was thus the direct result of its leaders’ idiotic pettit-nationalism. If Poland’s 1939 leaders had been politically realistic like Pilsudski, they would have realized that their best choice was an alliance on honorable terms with Germany.
And of course, Churchill and his Jew-masters sold Poland out. Britain and France declared war on Germany “for Poland” but really for International Jewish Finance. After the war, Poland got occupied by the Soviets. Now, Poland is another NATO bitch-state whose leaders will take as many “refugees” and as much faggotry as Washington tells them to.
“Nationalism” of the Keith Woods brand is a childish delusion. There is no possibility today of an 1815-style Concert of Nations. Europe-America has become one giant polity. The only question is, is it to be ruled by Whites or Jews?
As a Nazi, I would prefer White-rule. How about you?
06.03.202521:23
Kieth Woods:
"OMG guise it isn't 1933... it's 1848. Nationawism for everyone!"
"OMG guise it isn't 1933... it's 1848. Nationawism for everyone!"
18.02.202501:40
15.01.202503:06
Tahatlara تهتلر is a word in the way that "Hitlerify" is a word. But ok.
What this guy is missing is that the dictionary he got this from was initially funded by the Third Reich and written by NSDAP member Hans Wehr.
It has long been a standard in English-language (and presumably German) Arabic lexicography.
Just one more of National Socialism's many contributions to humanity. You're welcome.
Somebody who is allowed on Twitter should inform this Person gentleman of that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Wehr
https://x.com/sharghzadeh/status/1879199798542348615
What this guy is missing is that the dictionary he got this from was initially funded by the Third Reich and written by NSDAP member Hans Wehr.
It has long been a standard in English-language (and presumably German) Arabic lexicography.
Just one more of National Socialism's many contributions to humanity. You're welcome.
Somebody who is allowed on Twitter should inform this Person gentleman of that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Wehr
https://x.com/sharghzadeh/status/1879199798542348615
30.12.202403:52
An astoundingly tasteless article about Jimmy Carter by bloviating conservative nerd George F. Will.
"Jimmy Carter was the president who made Ronald Reagan necessary"
*EYE ROLL*
Sure Carter was a system stooge. But he looks like a saint and a genius compared to every president in the last 40 years, and was liked by pretty much everyone. So of course George Will has to bring up political feuds that barely anyone is still alive to care about.
He goes on to call Reagan "the human sunbeam". No joke. This is delusional even for the Washington Post.
He claims that Carter only became president because of "Eastern European" voters in Ohio breaking for him over Gerald Ford. Is he implying that Carter's presidency was a Soviet plot? Lol.
I always hated George F. Will but damn he's really losing it. Probably angry that no one will eulogize him on the papers when he finally croaks too.
https://archive.is/QjptJ
"Jimmy Carter was the president who made Ronald Reagan necessary"
*EYE ROLL*
Sure Carter was a system stooge. But he looks like a saint and a genius compared to every president in the last 40 years, and was liked by pretty much everyone. So of course George Will has to bring up political feuds that barely anyone is still alive to care about.
He goes on to call Reagan "the human sunbeam". No joke. This is delusional even for the Washington Post.
He claims that Carter only became president because of "Eastern European" voters in Ohio breaking for him over Gerald Ford. Is he implying that Carter's presidency was a Soviet plot? Lol.
I always hated George F. Will but damn he's really losing it. Probably angry that no one will eulogize him on the papers when he finally croaks too.
https://archive.is/QjptJ
Переслав з:
Justice for Vasilli
27.03.202520:44
Today vasillios pistolis was found guilty of “holding a burning object with intent to intimidate”. The ✡️ system waited nearly a decade to charge him with this bogus offense just like how they waited to charge Rob Rundo in order to kangaroo court them and make an example out of them to stop our people from speaking out. Please spread this around and send your prayers to him and his family.
Переслав з:
Nathan Damigo
22.03.202520:03
I think Striker said this in his interview on PWR, the real political battle right now is between reactionaries and revolutionaries. I couldn't agree more. Reactionaries will settle for an American Putin, which is essentially what Trump is aiming to be. While they may say they want an "ethnostate" they will fall in line behind any strong, so-called "right wing," leader because they themselves are effeminate and gravitate towards strength, regardless of if that leader is actually going to lead us to where we want to be. Their "political advocacy" is in reality just grumbling and complaining about the current situation, not a serious call for change. They stop fighting for the ideal they claim to support the moment a politician gives them some scraps.
Переслав з:Daniel Zakal's Art Gallery
06.03.202520:47
Woods Advocates Weakness, Compromise, and Intellectual Dishonesty
Keith Woods' arguments ultimately boil down to a defense of half-measures and ideological timidity, dressed up as pragmatic strategy. His primary concern—that National Socialism carries negative stigma—is nothing more than a fearful retreat into weakness and respectability politics. Rather than standing firmly behind a rigorous, comprehensive, and proven life-affirming ideology, Woods prefers a sanitized nationalism designed to placate enemies who despise our existence regardless.
Nationalism without National Socialism is precisely the half-measure that has repeatedly failed European peoples. It offers neither structural solutions nor ideological coherence. Woods' belief that the essence of National Socialism—its fundamental commitment to racial health, cultural vitality, economic independence, and disciplined self-overcoming—can be stripped away, leaving behind a vague ethnonationalist shell, is intellectually bankrupt. Such hollow nationalism can never provide the depth of purpose, moral clarity, or strategic vision essential for genuine rebirth and sustained revival.
Woods deliberately misconstrains the complexity of historical events, lazily parroting mainstream tropes without rigorous engagement with primary sources. He misrepresents the nature of Lebensraum, dismisses Slavic collaboration, and leans heavily on mistranslated excerpts from Hitler’s Table Talks. The reality is clear: the Table Talks—recorded firsthand in German by Picker and Heim—are authentic records, distorted only through English translations. To entirely dismiss them, as Woods does, is intellectually negligent and betrays a lack of scholarly integrity.
Woods' rejection of National Socialism reveals more than historical ignorance—it exposes his philosophical cowardice. His ideological stance resembles National Bolshevism, a confused hybrid that tries and fails to reconcile nationalism with leftist economic populism, inevitably resulting in ideological paralysis. Woods advocates a path of least resistance, endorsing a nationalism devoid of moral clarity or revolutionary intent. He proposes nothing concrete beyond vague appeals to national tradition, conveniently sidestepping the urgent structural crises—demographic collapse, cultural degeneration, economic subjugation—that demand radical solutions.
In short, Woods represents precisely what must be eradicated from nationalism: timidity, compromise, and a preoccupation with optics. He prioritizes popular acceptance over ideological integrity, fundamentally misunderstanding the reality that true nationalism requires sacrifice, struggle, and unwavering adherence to principles that sustain and elevate life.
The Life Affirming Principle dictates clear solutions: nationalism must be bold, disciplined, and uncompromising. It cannot thrive through half-hearted populism or sanitized historical revisionism. National Socialism is more than Adolf Hitler or the Third Reich; it is a timeless truth, discovered rather than invented, a guiding philosophy for cultural, biological, and economic health. To reject it is to reject the only fully coherent system capable of achieving lasting strength and survival for our people.
Ultimately, Woods embodies a defeatist mindset. He would rather pursue polite nationalism, begging permission to exist, instead of forging an uncompromising path toward genuine national renewal. His approach offers neither hope nor solutions, only endless retreat. To embrace Woods’ path is to embrace perpetual defeat.
Keith Woods' arguments ultimately boil down to a defense of half-measures and ideological timidity, dressed up as pragmatic strategy. His primary concern—that National Socialism carries negative stigma—is nothing more than a fearful retreat into weakness and respectability politics. Rather than standing firmly behind a rigorous, comprehensive, and proven life-affirming ideology, Woods prefers a sanitized nationalism designed to placate enemies who despise our existence regardless.
Nationalism without National Socialism is precisely the half-measure that has repeatedly failed European peoples. It offers neither structural solutions nor ideological coherence. Woods' belief that the essence of National Socialism—its fundamental commitment to racial health, cultural vitality, economic independence, and disciplined self-overcoming—can be stripped away, leaving behind a vague ethnonationalist shell, is intellectually bankrupt. Such hollow nationalism can never provide the depth of purpose, moral clarity, or strategic vision essential for genuine rebirth and sustained revival.
Woods deliberately misconstrains the complexity of historical events, lazily parroting mainstream tropes without rigorous engagement with primary sources. He misrepresents the nature of Lebensraum, dismisses Slavic collaboration, and leans heavily on mistranslated excerpts from Hitler’s Table Talks. The reality is clear: the Table Talks—recorded firsthand in German by Picker and Heim—are authentic records, distorted only through English translations. To entirely dismiss them, as Woods does, is intellectually negligent and betrays a lack of scholarly integrity.
Woods' rejection of National Socialism reveals more than historical ignorance—it exposes his philosophical cowardice. His ideological stance resembles National Bolshevism, a confused hybrid that tries and fails to reconcile nationalism with leftist economic populism, inevitably resulting in ideological paralysis. Woods advocates a path of least resistance, endorsing a nationalism devoid of moral clarity or revolutionary intent. He proposes nothing concrete beyond vague appeals to national tradition, conveniently sidestepping the urgent structural crises—demographic collapse, cultural degeneration, economic subjugation—that demand radical solutions.
In short, Woods represents precisely what must be eradicated from nationalism: timidity, compromise, and a preoccupation with optics. He prioritizes popular acceptance over ideological integrity, fundamentally misunderstanding the reality that true nationalism requires sacrifice, struggle, and unwavering adherence to principles that sustain and elevate life.
The Life Affirming Principle dictates clear solutions: nationalism must be bold, disciplined, and uncompromising. It cannot thrive through half-hearted populism or sanitized historical revisionism. National Socialism is more than Adolf Hitler or the Third Reich; it is a timeless truth, discovered rather than invented, a guiding philosophy for cultural, biological, and economic health. To reject it is to reject the only fully coherent system capable of achieving lasting strength and survival for our people.
Ultimately, Woods embodies a defeatist mindset. He would rather pursue polite nationalism, begging permission to exist, instead of forging an uncompromising path toward genuine national renewal. His approach offers neither hope nor solutions, only endless retreat. To embrace Woods’ path is to embrace perpetual defeat.
18.02.202500:01
Prussian Socialism Episode 45: The Rise of Byzantium and the Illyrian Soldier-State
Between AD 270 and the late 500s, the Roman Empire declined and fell to Germanic invaders, while a new, Byzantine Empire arose in the East.
At least, that's what it looks like. But states and peoples are different things. Sometimes a founding people dies, but its state lives on. That is what happened in Rome in the 3rd century. The original Roman people lost power to a new, hungry race of frontier-fighters: the so-called Illyrian Soldier-Emperors.
Contrary to the common opinion, the Illyrian-Danubian emperors weren't the outcome of increasing "diversity" or "tolerance" of the Roman State. They were a new, as-yet-unnamed people, who--abandoned by the central government--took matters into their own hands.
From Aurelian "the Restorer of the World" to Diocletian, Constantine the Great, Theodosius I and Justinian, these "Illyrians" built a state-within-a-state, kept the Roman Empire alive for two centuries, and carved out a new empire from its ruins. They restructured army, shook up the administration, and oversaw the most radical religious reform in European history. Theirs is the real history of the "late Roman" and "early Byzantine" empires.
Only amidst the chaos of the Persian and Islamic invasions of the early 600s did the 300-year-old Illyrian regime succumb... when they were finally overthrown by a new breed of Cappadocian and Armenian officers.
Join Gregory Conte for this myth-destroying lecture, as we examine the real meaning of Rome's last centuries; and the beginning of the 1000-year "Byzantine" state.
https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2/Prussian-Socialism-45-The-Rise-of-Byzantium-and-the-Illyrian-Soldier-State:4
Between AD 270 and the late 500s, the Roman Empire declined and fell to Germanic invaders, while a new, Byzantine Empire arose in the East.
At least, that's what it looks like. But states and peoples are different things. Sometimes a founding people dies, but its state lives on. That is what happened in Rome in the 3rd century. The original Roman people lost power to a new, hungry race of frontier-fighters: the so-called Illyrian Soldier-Emperors.
Contrary to the common opinion, the Illyrian-Danubian emperors weren't the outcome of increasing "diversity" or "tolerance" of the Roman State. They were a new, as-yet-unnamed people, who--abandoned by the central government--took matters into their own hands.
From Aurelian "the Restorer of the World" to Diocletian, Constantine the Great, Theodosius I and Justinian, these "Illyrians" built a state-within-a-state, kept the Roman Empire alive for two centuries, and carved out a new empire from its ruins. They restructured army, shook up the administration, and oversaw the most radical religious reform in European history. Theirs is the real history of the "late Roman" and "early Byzantine" empires.
Only amidst the chaos of the Persian and Islamic invasions of the early 600s did the 300-year-old Illyrian regime succumb... when they were finally overthrown by a new breed of Cappadocian and Armenian officers.
Join Gregory Conte for this myth-destroying lecture, as we examine the real meaning of Rome's last centuries; and the beginning of the 1000-year "Byzantine" state.
https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2/Prussian-Socialism-45-The-Rise-of-Byzantium-and-the-Illyrian-Soldier-State:4
11.01.202522:10
Special forces guy claims Trump ordered him to invade Venezuela. The CIA and FBI say he's lying.
If he is lying: how does the US government not uncover multi-million dollar military plots being organized in its own soil, in accordance with its own started desires (to capture Maduro), while also endeavoring to constantly censor and harass America's circa dozen broke public Natsocs?
If he's telling the truth: what sucker would ever volunteer to do secret missions for these people? They're just going to undermine and betray you. Why would you put your expertise and life at their disposal? Just to cause chaos around the world in the interest of international Jewish finance?
Anyone involved in US "black ops" should really be questioning what you're doing with your lives.
https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-maduro-green-beret-jordan-goudreau-6f312dcde47c5da6cf7a54aef8ccdd7e
If he is lying: how does the US government not uncover multi-million dollar military plots being organized in its own soil, in accordance with its own started desires (to capture Maduro), while also endeavoring to constantly censor and harass America's circa dozen broke public Natsocs?
If he's telling the truth: what sucker would ever volunteer to do secret missions for these people? They're just going to undermine and betray you. Why would you put your expertise and life at their disposal? Just to cause chaos around the world in the interest of international Jewish finance?
Anyone involved in US "black ops" should really be questioning what you're doing with your lives.
https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-maduro-green-beret-jordan-goudreau-6f312dcde47c5da6cf7a54aef8ccdd7e
27.12.202414:15
Показано 1 - 24 із 41
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.