Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Переглянути

Николаевский Ванёк

Переглянути

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Переглянути

Труха⚡️Україна

Переглянути

Николаевский Ванёк

Переглянути

Scott Ritter

An experienced military and geopolitical analyst with a proven track record of accuracy and integrity.
Contact [admin] @n13cwg
Q&A @Ritter_Feedback_Bot
The Russia House with Scott Ritter https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=smnz

Рейтинг TGlist

ТипПублічний

Верифікація

Не верифікований

Довіреність

Не надійний

РозташуванняРосія

МоваІнша

Дата створення каналуБер 10, 2025

Додано до TGlist

Вер 17, 2023

Я власник каналу

Історія змін

Прикріплена група

Scott Ritter Chat

2.5K

Статистика Телеграм-каналу Scott Ritter

Детальніше

Підписників

94 402

24 год.

360%Тиждень

283-0.3%Місяць

1 508-1.6%

Індекс цитування

100

Згадок1Репостів на каналах0Згадок на каналах1

Середнє охоплення 1 допису

8 321

12 год.6 1720%24 год.8 321

1.7%48 год.9 486

11%

Залученість (ER)

1.34%

Репостів42Коментарів8Реакцій139

Залученість за охопленням (ERR)

8.8%

24 год.

0.13%Тиждень

0.39%Місяць

0.15%

Охоплення 1 рекл. допису

7 936

1 год.1 75122.06%1 – 4 год.1 69121.31%4 - 24 год.4 49456.63%

Детальніше

Під'єднайте нашого бота до каналу і дізнайтеся стать аудиторії цього каналу.

Всього дописів за 24 години

3

Динаміка

Останні публікації в групі "Scott Ritter"

Всі дописи

18.04.202510:37

SPACE IS A TERRITORY OF FRIENDSHIP

⁣We had a good interview with Russian cosmonaut Oleg Artemyev.

Oleg shared with us his impressions of life and work in space. In between dangerous work in space, he and his colleagues play rugby and hockey and even plan a sambo tournament!

This interview was full of kindness and interesting communication. People of different cultures live and work together, and their friendship lasts a lifetime.

In the interview with cosmonaut Oleg Artemyev, you will learn about life and work in space from first-hand sources. Oleg Artemyev shares his personal impressions and experience gained during space flights.

Watch on The Russia House with Scott Ritter

18.04.202503:55

⁣ZIONISM, THE HUMAN PARASITOID

The tiny jewel wasp injects a neurotoxic venom into the ganglia of cockroaches, transforming the larger insect into a zombie which willingly allows itself to be transformed into a living host for the next generation of jewel wasps to feed on before emerging into the world, ready to prey on other unsuspecting cockroaches. Israel is the modern-day equivalent of the jewel wasp, a predator which infects its host with mind-altering poison so that it willingly sustains the parasitic intrusion into its being that will eventually take its life.

The host, in this case, is the United States. By allowing Israel to turn our nation into a zombified version of what our founding father’s envisioned, we simply facilitate our own collective demise.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

17.04.202517:52

⁣ENDGAME IRAN: PEACE OR WAR?

The past month has been a roller-coaster ride of escalatory rhetoric and military activity from the US and Iran, centered on the latter’s nuclear program. The Trump administration has labeled this program a potential existential threat to Israel and demanded it be dismantled. Iran, meanwhile, claims its program is a peaceful one that complies with its obligations as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Both Washington and Tehran walked this issue to the precipice before backing down and agreeing to negotiate. The US continues to maintain that a military option is still very much on the table, while Iran promises a devastating response if it is attacked. But for the moment, hostility has yielded to diplomacy.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

16.04.202516:33

TRUMP STRIKES BACK | IRAN DEFIANT | YEMEN & RUSSIA HOLD THE LINE
Interview for Dialogue Works

00:06 Introduction and current situation.
01:31 Pressure on the US and softening of the position.
11:47 Problems in the Trump administration.
23:01 Betrayal and treason.
32:09 Negotiations with Iran.
40:03 Control over Israel.
49:05 Libya and Gaddafi.
54:27 Iran and the nuclear program.
01:03:15 Meeting with Putin.
01:07:57 US reaction to Germany's actions.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

16.04.202504:10

15.04.202517:39

⁣MAKE IT SO

Life often imitates art. This is the case when we mere mortals turn to television of the large screen to provide examples of heroism as performed by actors (and actresses) who play the role of space explorers. But the fact is we don’t need to turn to the realm of fantasy to find such examples—they exist among us today, in the form of astronauts and cosmonauts from a number of nations who have worked together to explore the boundaries of science in outer space.

We earth-bound mortals would do well to learn the lessons of their successes. It could provide the key to our collective survival.

Read in full on The Russia House with Scott Ritter

15.04.202517:10

ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 253 Highlight

▫️We're On a "Highway to Hell”
▫️We Don’t Lose in a Standup Fight
▫️You Don't F* With the Russians
▫️Aren't Libya And Iran the Same?

See the FULL EPISODE HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

15.04.202513:26

⁣ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 255

Live Stream Scheduled for April 15, 2025 at 3:00pm ET

You can submit your questions via voice or text message: https://ustourofduty.org

You can also call live, 🇺🇸 +1(520) 525-8359

Watch on ustourofduty.org, Odysee, Locals, X (formerly Twitter), Rumble, Twitch, Telegram, VK

You can download the audio version of each episode on Spotify.

We're waiting for you!

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

15.04.202508:50

THE PERILS OF US/ISRAEL
Interview for Judging Freedom

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

15.04.202508:38

UKRAINE IS A TOOL FOR THE WEST TO BRING DOWN RUSSIA
Interview for TV Rain Newsroom

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

14.04.202519:44

⁣RUSSIA MUST NOT ALLOW WEST TO USE SUMY ATTACK AS AMMO FOR PROPAGANDA WAR

The biggest problem with the April 13 missile strike against Sumy is the perception of this attack, attempts by propagandists to frame it as a war crime, may endanger the entire US-Russia peace process.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

13.04.202519:05

ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 254 Highlight

▫️Who Is Worse: Banderists or ISIS?
▫️Nukes Are A Suicide Pill For Iran.
▫️Love Iran More Than You Hate America.
▫️Don't Put Words In My Mouth.
▫️Russia, China, America Agree: NonProliferation.
▫️The Kellogg Plan Is Trash.

See the FULL EPISODE HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

13.04.202509:44

TRUMP DESTROYS THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE SYSTEM
Interview for Gegenpol

00:10 Impact of Trump's tariffs on US citizens.
03:31 Do the tariffs strengthen or weaken the US economy?
06:23 Impeachment of Trump?
07:21 Why no tariffs against Russia?
09:31 Peace negotiations stalled?
12:15 What is the “coalition of the willing” planning?
14:28 Threat of war between Iran and the USA?
18:43 Can Iran endanger the USA at all?

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

12.04.202510:01

Today, April 12th, is Cosmonautics Day in Russia. This is the date of the first human spaceflight, which was performed on April 12, 1961, by Soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin on the Vostok spacecraft.

We are preparing an exclusive interview with a real astronaut for you!

We will learn about life in space, preparation for flights, impressions of what we saw from the porthole and much more. We will look beyond the limits of the Earth together with a professional!

Next week at The Russia House with Scott Ritter.

12.04.202503:45

⁣FREE SPEECH AND THE APOCALYPSE

If the US government had its way, my latest book, Highway to Hell: The Armageddon Chronicles, 2015-2024, would never have been written, let alone published. The government wants to control the narrative around the threat of nuclear conflict.

Highway to Hell destroys the government narrative, exposing the reality of the dangers of a nuclear conflict, and how the government is making such a conflict more than a possibility, but rather a distinct probability, for the American people and the rest of the world.

Read more CLICK HERE

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

Всі дописи

Рекламувався2 години

15.04.202515:38World Pravda

44.3K

Детальніше

Рекорди

28.11.202423:59

98.5KПідписників

02.02.202523:22

3300Індекс цитування

10.05.202423:29

22.3KОхоплення 1 допису

02.10.202423:59

21.9KОхоп рекл. допису

27.09.202423:59

28.36%ER

02.10.202423:59

22.74%ERR

Розвиток

Детальніше

Підписників

Індекс цитування

Охоплення 1 допису

Охоп рекл. допису

ERR

Детальніше

Популярні публікації Scott Ritter

Всі дописи

18.04.202503:55

Переслав з:

The Russia House with Scott Ritter

18.03.202518:35

05.04.202506:02

⁣It’s a tribal gathering.

If you took the time to truly “know your enemy”, you’d realize you just murdered a bunch of innocent civilians.

Instead you rely on ignorant drone operators who are under pressure to produce results because the truth is your air campaign hasn’t done anything to stop Houthi missile strikes against shipping or Israel.

Kids who don’t understand the culture of the people you have ordered them to kill.

Congratulations.

You’re no better than Obama.

And that’s a low bar.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

18.03.202504:36

And, in one night of narcissistic megalomania, Donald Trump gave up the title peacemaker, exchanging it for warmonger, and put himself on the path of becoming America’s greatest loser.

America can’t be “great again” when the price of oil shoots through the roof.

And starting a war with Iran will go down in history as one of the worst self-inflicted wounds an American President ever committed.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

01.04.202510:51

I’m always struck by the ignorance of the digital mob.

Especially those who claim to have “supported me all these years” and suddenly take umbrage over my assiduous insistence on adherence to international law by all parties.

If you truly knew me you’d know I cut my teeth on treaty compliance verification implementing the INF treaty.

Where I was deeply involved in a crisis that hinged on treaty interpretation that ultimately showed the Soviets were correct.

Yes, that meant that I and others argued against the official US position because the treaty which we were bound to argued the opposite.

You’d know that while I articulated sympathies with the Iraqi stance against Kuwait, I waged war against Iraq because the United Nations passed a Chapter VII resolution authorizing the use of military force because Iraq invaded and occupied Kuwait.

You’d know that while I agreed with the Iraqi complaint that even if they complied with UN demands to disarm (another Chapter VII resolution) sanctions would not be lifted, I was unyielding in implementing the disarmament mandate to the full extent required by international law.

You’d know that my stance against the war against Iraq was grounded in the fact that Iraq had complied with its disarmament obligations, and the US case was premised on a lie.

But that if Iraq was, in fact, non-compliant, then I believed military action would have been justified.

If you truly knew me, you’d know that my position has always been strict adherence to treaty obligations.

And that my interpretation of Iran’s compliance status is consistent under the NPT.

But you don’t know me.

You only pretend to.

And you know nothing of international law.

You are the digital mob. Charlatans all.

I’ve never said military action by the US is justified.

So don’t put words in my mouth.

In order for any military action against Iran to be justified you would either need Iran to attack another nation, triggering Article 51 of the UN Charter, or the UN Security Council would need pass a resolution under Chapter VII authorizing military force to resolve a clearly articulated threat.

An argument under preemptive self defense likewise fails because there is no imminent threat; even the emergence of a dedicated nuclear weapons program in Iran would not justify unilateral military action since there would be an opportunity to resolve the emerging threat through the United Nations.

So there are no existing circumstances that would justify and/or legitimize military action against Iran by the United States.

But that’s not the point.

Trump is on track to attack Iran.

This is reality. A reality I don’t support. A reality I condemn.

And a reality I am trying to avert.

Trump has articulated his case against Iran as being centered on Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons.

So my focus has been on how best to craft a pathway to peace.

One premised on Iran’s adherence to the letter and intent of the NPT.

You can disagree with my approach.

But don’t ever say that I am justifying a military strike by the US against Iran.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

12.04.202510:01

23.03.202508:41

Let’s make this as clear as possible:

Iran is a signatory to the NPT.

It has been since 1970.

Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Iran has said it is not seeking nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Supreme Leader has issued a religious edict prohibiting Iran from having nuclear weapons.

So everyone should be in agreement:

Iran is committed to adhering to a treaty obligation which prohibits it from having nuclear weapons.

There is no clause that provides an exception to this obligation because Israel has nuclear weapons.

Not even Iran makes that argument.

Last year a succession of Iranian leaders made statements which, when viewed in totality, call into question Iran’s intent when it comes to nuclear weapons.

In February 2024 Ali Akbar Salehi, a former leader of Tehran's nuclear program, said that Iran possesses all the necessary components for a nuclear weapon.

In April 2024 Ahmad Haghtalab, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander who serves as the head of security for Iran’s nuclear sites declared “It is possible and conceivable to revise the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear doctrine and policies to deviate from previously declared considerations.”

And in October 2024 nearly 40 members of parliament sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, its top security policymaking body, requesting that the council revise the defense doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran to permit development of nuclear weapons.

Statements such as these have prompted President Trump to make the denuclearization of Iran a top priority.

Trump recently sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme leader in which a stark choice was offered: negotiate or go to war.

Iran has indicated any attack against its nuclear facilities would likely cause them to change their nuclear doctrine.

It is believed Iran could rapidly move to build a believable nuclear weapon within a few weeks once the decision was made.

It is believed Iran’s critical nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.

So deep no conventional munitions could destroy them.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with conventional munitions that failed to achieve their objective of destruction, an Iranian nuclear weapon would be all but assured.

This is why Trump ordered the US nuclear posture and employment plans to be altered so that low-yield nuclear weapons possessing the ability to destroy underground facilities such as those housing Iran’s nuclear program would be developed and deployed.

Today the US has two nuclear weapons specifically fielded for this purpose: the B61-12 gravity bomb and the W-76-2 low yield nuclear warhead for use on the Trident submarine launched missile.

Both weapons are operational and deployed where they could readily be used against Iran.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with the goal of guaranteeing its destruction, he would have to use nuclear weapons preemptively.

This fits in with both the nuclear posture and implementation plan Trump signed off on which Iran specifically in mind.

There are those who say that by making this assessment, I am advocating for a nuclear strike on Iran by the US.

This simply isn’t true.

I’m providing an assessment, not soliciting in favor of war.

A war with Iran would be a disaster.

A nuclear attack on Iran by the US would be catastrophic.

I am firmly against both.

But that won’t stop me from providing the most accurate analysis of what I believe is actually happening today regarding Iran, whether I support such policies or not.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

18.04.202510:37

07.04.202520:48

For weeks I have been advocating for a negotiated settlement to the crisis that has brought the US and Iran on the brink of war.

I have assiduously detailed the nature of the threat perceived by the US that, if unresolved, would necessitate military action, as exclusively revolving around Iran’s nuclear program and, more specifically, that capacity that is excess to its declared peaceful program and, as such, conducive to a nuclear weapons program Iran has admitted is on the threshold of being actualized.

In short, I have argued, the most realistic path forward regarding conflict avoidance would be for Iran to negotiate in good faith regarding the verifiable disposition of its excess nuclear enrichment capability.

Even when Trump alienated Iran with his “maximum pressure” tactics, including an insulting letter to the Supreme Leader that all but eliminated the possibility of direct negotiations between the US and Iran, my stance remained unchanged: this crisis could only be resolved through negotiation, and that if Trump took direct negotiations off the table, then Russia and/or China would have to step up and nail down a settlement through third party talks.

For opting to promote a reality-based process that provided the only viable path toward peace, I was viciously attacked and ridiculed by both the digital mob, comprised of new age philosophers, self-styled “peace activists”, and a troll class that opposes anything and everything it doesn’t understand (which is most factually-grounded argument), as well as people I had viewed as fellow travelers on a larger journey of conflict avoidance—podcasters, experts and pundits who did more than simply disagree with me (which is, of course, their right and duty as independent thinkers), traversing into the realm of insults and attacks against my intelligence, integrity and character.

Today we see the following:
Trump has softened his stance on Iran, narrowing his focus to exclusively nuclear issues—as I had predicted.

Iran has agreed to third party negotiations—as I predicted, and both Russia and China will be meeting with Iran in the coming days to discuss its nuclear program—as I predicted.

The Director-General of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, has announced he may be heading to Iran shortly to discuss Iran’s nuclear program—as I predicted.

The US-Iran crisis is grounded in the complexities, niceties and formalities of international law as set forth in the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT), which Iran signed in 1970 as a non-nuclear weapons state.

The NPT will be at the center of any negotiated settlement.

Those who dismissed the NPT and belittled the role of international law simply underscored their ignorance of the reality that surrounds Iran’s nuclear program.

While Israel may have exaggerated Iran’s nuclear capabilities over the years, and goaded the US to attack Iran because of the alleged threat posed by its nuclear program, the fact remains that this crisis has been triggered by the very capabilities Iran admits to having—stocks of 60% enriched uranium with no link to Iran’s declared peaceful program, and excessive advanced centrifuge-based enrichment capability which leaves Iran days away from possessing sufficient weapons grade high enriched uranium to produce 3-5 nuclear weapons.

This crisis isn’t about Israel or Israel’s own undeclared nuclear weapons capability.

It is about Iran’s self-declared status as a threshold nuclear weapons state, something prohibited by the NPT.

This is what the negotiations will focus on.
And hopefully these negotiations will permit the verifiable dismantling of those aspects of its nuclear program the US (and Israel) find to present an existential threat.

Peace is not guaranteed.

But war is unless common sense and fact-based logic wins out over the self-important ignorance of the digital mob and their facilitators.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

15.04.202508:38

UKRAINE IS A TOOL FOR THE WEST TO BRING DOWN RUSSIA
Interview for TV Rain Newsroom

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

14.04.202519:44

19.03.202518:42

THIS IS REAL DIALOGUE THAT HASN'T TAKEN PLACE FOR SOME TIME NOW

No previous American administration, especially the Biden administration, had been willing to engage Russia to the level that the Trump administration is engaging Russia… This is about reengaging diplomatically. This is about normalizing relations. This is real dialogue that has not taken place for some time now.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

03.04.202517:35

MI6 AGENT ZELENSKY? WHO CONTROLS THE UKRAINE ARMY?
Interview for Garland Nixon

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

23.03.202511:45

In the fall of 1992, when I was a weapons inspector in Iraq, we had hit an impasse with Iraq.

I had just finished a nine-month inspection campaign designed to account for Iraq’s SCUD missiles.

Iraq had initially lied in its declaration and tried to hold onto 100 missiles.

I helped expose the lie, then compel Iraq to tell the truth.

This meant carrying out inspections backed by the threat of military force.

In the end, Iraq told the truth, and we inspectors were able to verify this fact.

The Security Council had just passed a new resolution requiring Iraq to subject to the permanent monitoring of its dual-use facilities—pretty much any facility that could be used to help produce weapons of mass destruction.

Iraq refused, claiming that sanctions needed to be lifted first.

I was eating lunch with my Iraqi counterparts.

They made the point that there was no reason to cooperate since the US refused to lift sanctions until Saddam was gone.

I said that the law was clear—Iraq had to agree to monitoring inspections.

They replied such inspections would be tantamount to spying.

I sketched out a proposal on a piece of paper. Instead of having inspections like the ones I led come to Iraq every few weeks, why not allow an inspection team to carry out a three month survey of Iraq’s missile production capabilities, jointly with Iraq, and develop joint monitoring standards acceptable to both parties?

The Iraqi leadership accepted this, and thus began the interim monitoring program, which helped get Iraq to accept long term monitoring inspections and prevented a war.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

22.03.202517:05

George Murdoch Connell was a close friend and mentor.

As a Colonel of Marines, he taught me more about leadership and what it meant to be a leader of men than anyone else.

He also is the man who guided me along the path from warrior to peacemaker, overseeing my work in the Soviet Union as a weapons inspector implementing the INF Treaty.

In May 1966 George Connell, at the time a First Lieutenant assigned as the Executive Officer of C Company, 1st Battalion, 9th Marines, was deployed to South Vietnam. His unit was part of an offensive called the Ky Lam Campaign, designed to clear the enemy out of a broad swath south of the Thu Bon River all the way to the coast known to the Marines as “Arizona territory.”

General Võ Nguyên Giáp, the commander of the North Vietnamese Army, promised President Ho Chi Minh that he would wipe out the 1st Battalion, 9th Marines, as a present for the leader's birthday (May 19, 1966). Giáp referred to the Marines of 1/9 as “Di Bo Chet", translated as the "Walking Dead".

George Connell and the Marines of 1/9 did not die. In the heavy fighting that followed, they inflicted a massive defeat on Giáp and the NVA/VC, who were compelled to withdraw from the valley.

The Marines of 1/9 proudly took on the name “The Walking Dead.”

George Connell was awarded a Silver Star for heroism in action that saw him overcoming painful wounds while leading his Marines in close combat against the enemy.

When I visited Colonel Connell’s home in Virginia, on the wall was a black and white photograph of George during that campaign. He was young, tired but defiant, holding an M-16 with bayonet fixed.

Connell had just led his Marines in a bayonet charge to clear the enemy from dug in positions from which they had just disabled two US tanks.

We may have lost the Vietnam War.

But the Marines of 1/9–The Walking Dead—were never defeated.

George Connell never lost a battle.

When he retired in 1990, Major General Matthew Caulfield, who had served with George in Vietnam, and who was serving at the time as the Director of the USMC Warfighting Center, read Connell’s Silver Star citation to a graduating class of The Basic School, the Marine’s 6-month “finishing school” for all Marine lieutenants, regardless of military occupation specialty. All Marines are riflemen, and all Marine officers are platoon commanders. These future leaders of Marines stood proudly listening to an account of heroism that would inspire them, as it inspired me.

I looked at George Connell standing there, proud, unbent—undefeated.

Men like that don’t suffer defeat.

Because they belong to an organization that cannot be defeated.

America left Vietnam because it lost the will to fight as a nation.

But the “Walking Dead” and the other Marines who served in Vietnam were never defeated in battle.

Lesson over.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.