Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
VI
ViroLIEgy
VI
ViroLIEgy
Dr. Michel Peter, French physician & member of the Académie de Médecine (and Pasteur’s cousin by marriage), was a fierce critic. He accused Pasteur of creating diseases like anthrax & rabies through the very vaccines meant to prevent them.

Source:

https://archive.org/details/b28067393

For more on Pasteur's anthrax and rabies fraud, please see these articles:

https://viroliegy.com/category/rabies/
16.04.202513:15
Pasteur, usually secretive, let outsiders observe his rabies work for 3 weeks. Even with rabid rabbits from him, they failed to replicate his results. After deaths linked to his vaccine, critics used these failures to challenge the method’s legitimacy.

Pasteur dismissed the failures of De Renzi, Amoroso (Naples), and Abreu (Lisbon). But Professor von Frisch was harder to ignore—he stated Pasteur failed to refute his evidence and warned the vaccine shouldn’t be used on man.

What does it say about Pasteur’s methods if his results repeatedly failed independent replication—a cornerstone of science?

Sources:

1. https://archive.org/details/privatescienceof0000geis

2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20212253
10.04.202512:39
Bacteriophages became the model for "infectious viruses" based on bacterial culture lysis—yet lysis is admitted to occur without any "virus" present. Early microbiologists observed this lysis often, but called it autolysis—not "infection." No one proposed "infectious" agents.

Rather than investigate a new cause, researchers saw lysis as a methodological error and repeated experiments. They didn’t see it as a biological phenomenon needing explanation. The idea of phages wasn't drawn directly from the observations, but applied later as a reinterpretation.

Source:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33050848/

For more on how bacteriophages were erroneously manufactured into the model for "pathogenic viruses," please see this article:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/10/07/the-virus-model/
06.04.202514:05
I was alerted to a Spanish article that supposedly challenged me. I was ready to rebut—until I realized there was nothing to rebut. Just a lazy hit piece built on a genetic fallacy.

Also, I have no books on Amazon. To the author: get your facts straight before writing. 🤦‍♂️

For anyone curious what a sloppy attempt to dismiss a position looks like, feel free to translate and read it for yourself.

https://badajozylaguerraincivil.blogspot.com/2025/03/viroliegy.html#comment-form
Virologists can't agree if "viruses" are alive, dead, or something in between—but they're sure these Schrödinger’s enigmas are out to get you. Sounds more like a script from "The Walking Dead" than science.

Source:

https://theconversation.com/how-viruses-blur-the-boundaries-of-life-230802

For more on the inability of virologists to agree on whether their fictional boogeyman are dead or alive:

https://viroliegy.com/2023/11/10/inventing-the-nature-of-viruses/
Williams discussed how "viruses" were identified in impure preparations. He stated that TMV could be identified in impure samples because of its rod-like shape, assuming all rod-like particles are the "virus." He noted EM could not identify unknown "viruses" in impure samples.
18.04.202513:09
Updated: “Introduction to ViroLIEgy” v2.0 is live. A deeper dive into the failures of germ “theory” that led to the invention of the “virus” concept—now with expanded arguments, historical context, and links that flesh it all out.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/intro-to-viroliegy
The brilliant Dr. Mari Arce has a new book coming out titled Germs Are Not Our Enemy! — launching soon! Check out her new website and watch the exciting trailer promoting this groundbreaking work. Be sure to pre-order your copy of what’s sure to be an insightful and empowering read!

https://www.germsarenotourenemy.com/
Highly regarded British physician and medical author Dr. Charles Creighton, considered the most learned British medical scholar of the 19th century, denounced the germ "theory" of disease and vaccination. For this, he was relegated to the fringes of the medical community and ignored.

Source:

https://archive.org/details/virushistoryofco0000hugh/mode/1up?q=Midpoint&view=theater

For more prominent, marginalized voices speaking out against the germ "theory" and vaccination:

1. https://viroliegy.com/2023/10/06/the-germ-theory-house-of-cards/

2. https://viroliegy.com/2024/05/09/who-are-the-quacks/

3. https://viroliegy.com/2024/08/23/lost-found/

4. https://viroliegy.com/2021/11/28/vaccination-proved-useless-and-dangerous-1889/
04.04.202513:21
The germ "theory" of disease became the perfect scapegoat for those poisoning the environment—letting them hijack healthcare, banish naturopathy, and sell back their toxic waste as "cures" to the unsuspecting public.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/04/the-snake-oil-tycoon/
Williams noted that "virus" identification requires more than images. A disease must first be established, & a distinct particle must be consistently correlated with it. He warned that EM’s visual appeal makes it vulnerable to misuse, leading researchers to see what they expect.

Source:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065352708605333

For more on the importance of purification and isolation:

https://viroliegy.com/category/purification-isolation/

For more on why EM images alone are not direct proof of "pathogenic viruses."

https://viroliegy.com/category/electron-microscope-images/
In 1954, Robley Williams noted that "virus" particles need to be purified (freed of contaminants, host materials, etc.) to the highest degree possible in order to draw a faithful and unambiguous conclusion they are the "virus." This was not the case for those already identified.
17.04.202512:14
When it comes to autism: "It’s incredibly complex with hundreds of genetic and environmental factors!"
But for so-called "infectious" diseases like AIDS: "It’s this one invisible thing. Trust us."
Funny how multifactorial causation seems to only apply when it’s not a "virus." 🤔

Source:

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/04/16/nx-s1-5366676/autism-cdc-rates-rfk-research
14.04.202513:11
Some believe Robert Koch won the Nobel Prize for proving the TB bacterium causes disease in humans. But that’s incorrect. His award was for discovering the bacterium — not for proving causation. In fact, Koch couldn’t even satisfy his own postulates designed to establish a cause.

https://viroliegy.com/2025/04/14/tb-or-not-tb/
Dr. Mark Bailey’s “A Farewell to Virology” is a masterful takedown of “Covid-19” & virology. First a free essay, then a powerful 3-part documentary—now available in a beautiful hardcover including “Virology’s Event Horizon” & “Virus, Bacteriophage and Single ‘Virus’ Genomics.”

If you’d like to support the Baileys’ work, consider buying a copy for yourself—or for someone who needs to understand the depth of the virology fraud.

https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/

Please see this article for my take on Mark's amazing work, with links to the documentary and his other brilliant piece, "The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity."

https://viroliegy.com/2022/09/16/dr-mark-bailey-bids-farewell-to-virology/
If I had groundbreaking evidence to dismantle PCR, I wouldn’t withhold it—especially from those who crowdfunded an "open-source" project. But if someone didn’t have that evidence, I could see why they might resort to false accusations to avoid admitting it.

https://x.com/ViroLIEgy/status/1898749461624447176
Williams acknowledged that EM is often used on impure samples and cannot conclusively identify "virus" particles. He emphasized that EM can only show a correlation between a particle’s presence and an associated activity, but this does not demonstrate causation.
29.03.202514:57
Jamie and his associates' attacks are becoming more outlandish by the minute. I applaud Dr. Tom Cowan for taking the necessary step of blocking those who resort to slanderous lies and vulgarity. There's no justification for these attempts to sow division.

https://x.com/drtomcowan/status/1905712766792638706
Why do you need to be told whether you have allergies or a cold? Because the symptoms are the same—only the label changes. Whether it's "allergic" or "viral" rhinitis, the experience is identical. The difference lies in the story, not the symptoms.

Source:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/conditions/cold-flu/your-hay-fever-might-be-one-of-these-four-spring-viruses/

For more on how the only difference is the label and the story sold for the same symptoms of disease, see this article:

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/common-allergies-or-the-seasonal
07.04.202512:09
Robert Kennedy Jr. is handing out vaccines and praising MMR as "the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles."

Big Pharma’s really shaking in their boots. Any day now. 😒

This is all easier to understand once you realize that RFK Jr. was never against vaccines.

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/the-anti-anti-vaccine-kennedy
In 1909, Robert Koch inferred "viruses" existed because disease persisted despite bacteria being filtered out. This is begging the question—assuming an invisible microbe must be the cause. This is a core fallacy continued to be employed by virologists today.

Robert Koch also committed affirming the consequent: "If viruses exist, disease occurs; disease occurs, so viruses exist."

For more on the fallacious reasoning utilized by virologists:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/09/05/viroliegy-101-logical-fallacies/

For more on the "virus" concept:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/03/29/the-virus-concept/
Williams admitted that EM has technical limitations, making interpretations subjective. He noted the mental leap from grayscale images to assuming a "virus" is present and questioned whether they can ever be certain they're truly observing an "infectious" entity.
28.03.202512:36
A 1964 paper reported that plants deliberately "infected" with an inoculant claimed to contain the tobacco mosaic "virus" (TMV) did not produce a single "viral" particle when examined using electron microscopy.

"Viral" particles were not detected at any stage, despite cytopathogenic effects occurring in the "infected" plants. Researchers suggested that CPE resulted from metabolic disruption, not "viral" replication—meaning the damage did not require a "virus" at all.

Source:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d11d/633e0edc1f654acdf0dc5d8a287ee3fe5b24.pdf

For more on TMV and how the "virus" concept was created, please see this article:

https://viroliegy.com/2024/03/29/the-virus-concept/
Показано 1 - 24 із 106
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.