هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش

این پرسش‌ها چارچوبی کلیدی برای ارزیابی انتقادی هر متن، مقاله یا پژوهشی فراهم می‌کنند. اهمیت آن‌ها در این است که به خواننده کمک می‌کنند تا فراتر از درک سطحی مطلب رفته و به لایه‌های عمیق‌تر آن نفوذ کند. با پاسخ به این سوالات، می‌توان مشخص کرد که آیا استدلال نویسنده منطقی و مستحکم است، آیا شواهد ارائه شده معتبر، کافی و مرتبط هستند و آیا هدف نویسنده (مثلاً اطلاع‌رسانی، متقاعدسازی یا تحلیل) به درستی محقق شده است یا خیر. این فرآیند به خواننده قدرت می‌دهد تا اطلاعات را به سادگی نپذیرد، بلکه آن را فعالانه تجزیه و تحلیل کند.

علاوه بر ارزیابی محتوای اصلی و شواهد، این سوالات به شناسایی جنبه‌های مهم دیگری مانند سوگیری‌های احتمالی نویسنده، مفروضات پنهان در استدلال‌ها و محدودیت‌های پژوهش (در صورت وجود) کمک می‌کنند. بررسی ساختار، وضوح زبان و جایگاه متن در مقایسه با دیگر آثار مشابه نیز به درک کامل‌تر و دقیق‌تر پیام و اهمیت آن یاری می‌رساند. در نهایت، استفاده از این چارچوب تحلیلی، مهارت تفکر انتقادی خواننده را تقویت کرده و او را قادر می‌سازد تا با دیدی بازتر و قضاوتی آگاهانه‌تر با متون مختلف مواجه شود.

What is the central point the author is trying to make? Can you state it clearly in your own words?
Is the purpose clear? Is it to inform, persuade, analyze, report?
Is the main argument clear, specific, and focused? Or is it vague and hard to pin down?

What kind of evidence does the author use? (e.g., data from experiments, statistics, surveys, case studies, historical documents, expert testimony, anecdotes, logical reasoning).
Is the evidence relevant to the point being made?
Is the evidence sufficient? Is there enough of it to convincingly support the claims?
Is the evidence credible and reliable? Where does it come from? Is the source trustworthy? (For data: How was it collected? Is the methodology sound?)
Does the author distinguish between fact and opinion?
Are the sources cited properly? (If applicable).

How was the research conducted? Was the method appropriate for the research question?
Are there flaws in the design? (e.g., sample size too small, lack of control group, biased sampling).
Could the results be interpreted differently?
Does the author acknowledge the limitations of their study?

What underlying assumptions does the author make? Are these assumptions reasonable or questionable?
Does the argument follow a logical progression? Are there any logical fallacies (e.g., jumping to conclusions, false dichotomies, straw man arguments)?
Does the author connect the evidence logically to the conclusions? Are there gaps in reasoning?

What is the author's perspective or stance?
Does the author present a balanced view, or do they ignore or dismiss opposing viewpoints?
Is there evidence of bias? (e.g., loaded language, selective use of evidence, emotional appeals over logic, undeclared conflicts of interest).
Does the author fairly represent the views of others they critique?

Is the article well-organized and easy to follow?
Is the language clear and precise? Or is it confusing, ambiguous, or overly technical/jargony?
Is the tone appropriate for the audience and purpose? (e.g., objective, persuasive, informative).

How does this article relate to other work in the field or on the topic? Does it build upon, challenge, or ignore other relevant work?
Is the information timely, or could it be outdated?
What is the overall significance or contribution of the article? Does it offer new insights, a useful summary, or a flawed analysis?

این پرامپت برای افرادی طراحی شده که قصد دارند برای دوره دکتری اپلای کنند و به دنبال استاد راهنمایی هستند که زمینه پژوهشی‌اش با علایق آن‌ها هم‌راستا باشد. با استفاده از این درخواست، می‌توان فهرستی از اساتید فعال در یک حوزه خاص به دست آورد که شامل نام استاد، دانشگاه محل فعالیت، لینک‌های پروفایل تحقیقاتی (مثل Google Scholar یا ResearchGate)، و خلاصه‌ای از فعالیت‌های علمی آن‌ها است. همچنین این پرامپت می‌تواند راهنمایی‌هایی برای نحوه تماس مؤثر با اساتید جهت پیشنهاد همکاری یا گرفتن پذیرش ارائه دهد.

در واقع، این ابزار یک میان‌بُر هوشمندانه برای جست‌وجوی هدفمند استاد راهنماست که فرآیند پرزحمت پیدا کردن پژوهشگر مناسب را ساده، سریع و هدفمند می‌کند و شانس موفقیت در پذیرش را افزایش می‌دهد.

I am looking to apply for a phd program in [your field] and want to find a professor whose research aligns with my interests. My specific research interests include [your specific topics].
I need you to help me identify professors who are active in this area, preferably those who have published significant papers or are leading funded projects.
Please provide a list of professors, their universities, links to their research profiles (Google Scholar, ResearchGate, etc.), and a brief summary of their work. If possible, also suggest how I should approach contacting them for collaboration or supervision.

✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌نویسی
✅ 6 ساعت وبینار هوش‌مصنوعی در پژوهش
✅ کتابچه تحلیل داده با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

✅ 5 ساعت آموزش آشنایی با مبانی مدل‌های زبانی بزرگ
✅ 15 ساعت آموزش پرامپت‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 20 ساعت آموزش مقاله‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش تصویرسازی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 5 ساعت آموزش برنامه‌نویسی با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ 10 ساعت آموزش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌نویسی
✅ 6 ساعت وبینار هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه تحلیل داده با هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ عضویت کانال منابع هوش‌مصنوعی
✅ کتابچه راهنمای مقاله‌نویسی

پس از این که سوالات پژوهشی و فرضیات خود را به هوش مصنوعی داده و فایل مقاله خود را آپلود کرده اید به کمک این سی پرامپت و مقالاتی که از سایت اسکوپوس یا کانسنسس در مورد جمع بندی جمع آوری کرده اید میتوانید بخش جمع بندی را دقیق تر بنویسید.

1. Restate the Thesis: Summarize the main argument or purpose of my work.

2. Summarize Key Points: Highlight the main points discussed in the body.

3. Synthesize, Don’t Summarize: Show how the points fit together.

4. Answer the “So What?” Question: Explain the significance of my findings.

5. Provide Closure: Ensure the reader feels a sense of completion.

6. Avoid Introducing New Information: Stick to what has already been discussed.

7. Reflect on the Introduction: Tie back to the opening statement or question.

8. Use a Strong Final Sentence: Leave a lasting impression.

9. Be Concise: Keep it brief and to the point.

10. Maintain a Positive Tone: End on an optimistic note.

11. Highlight Implications: Discuss the broader impact of my findings.

12. Suggest Future Research: Point out areas for further investigation.

13. Acknowledge Limitations: Be honest about any limitations in my work.

14. Use Clear and Simple Language: Avoid jargon and complex sentences.

15. Stay Objective: Keep personal opinions out unless it’s a reflective piece.

16. Reinforce the Main Message: Make sure the main takeaway is clear.

17. Use Transition Words: Ensure smooth flow from the body to the conclusion.

18. Avoid Redundancy: Don’t repeat points verbatim.

19. Be Original: Offer a fresh perspective or insight.

20. Check for Consistency: Ensure the conclusion aligns with the rest of the work.

21. Use Evidence: Support my final points with evidence.

22. Be Persuasive: Convince the reader of my argument’s validity.

23. Reflect on the Broader Context: Place my findings in a wider context.

24. Avoid Apologies: Don’t undermine my work by apologizing for its limitations.

25. Use a Formal Tone: Maintain a professional tone.

26. Be Honest: Don’t exaggerate my findings.

27. Use Active Voice: Make my writing more engaging.

28. Edit and Proofread: Ensure there are no errors.

29. Seek Feedback: Get a second opinion on my conclusion.

30. Stay True to My Voice: Let my unique style shine through.

با این مجموعه پرامپت‌ خفن، تصاویر معمولیت رو تبدیل کن به آرت‌ورک‌هایی با استایل Cel Shading. دقیقاً همون افکتی که تو انیمه‌ها، کمیک‌بوک‌ها می‌بینی! فقط کافیه یکی از این پرامپت‌ها رو امتحان کنی و نتیجه‌شو ببینی... یه دنیای کارتونی از تصویر خودت می‌سازی!

"Apply the 'Toon Shader / Cel Shading' style to the given image."

"Turn this image into a cel-shaded anime-style artwork with bold outlines and flat colors."

"Transform this image into a cel-shaded video game-style render, with stylized shadows and edge lines."

"Apply a hand-drawn cel shading effect to the image, mimicking traditional cartoon art styles."

"Render this image in the style of a cel-shaded 90s anime, with dramatic shadows and vibrant highlights."

A serene, high-resolution image showcases a charming cottage painted in faded blue, nestled in a sunlit meadow. Its red roof, aged terracotta tiles, and surrounding wildflowers create a vivid contrast against a bright sky, with detail-steeped textures on the house and nature, all illuminated by a warm, golden sunlight.

این پرامپت، هوش مصنوعی را به انجام وظیفه‌ای ظریف و مهم در نگارش علمی هدایت می‌کند: تدوین بخش نتیجه‌گیری. هوش مصنوعی ملزم است با تحلیل و ترکیب 'نکات کلیدی' استخراج شده از مجموعه منابع داده‌شده در فایل‌های CSV، به خلق نتیجه‌گیری منسجم و معنادار مبادرت ورزد. اهمیت این پرامپت در دقت و صحت آن نهفته است؛ هوش مصنوعی نه تنها باید محتوای منابع را به درستی بازتاب دهد، بلکه موظف است با رعایت کامل اصول استناددهی APA ویرایش هفتم، اعتبار علمی و حقوق مالکیت فکری منابع را به نحو احسن پاس دارد. این امر مستلزم درک عمیق از ساختار مقالات علمی و مهارت در به کارگیری دقیق فرمت‌های استنادی است.

"Please write a conclusion section using the 'Takeaway' points from the resources provided in the two CSV files. Also, include the corresponding APA 7 style citations for each source referenced."

I have a set of references on {your title}. Could you write a literature review using these references in proper academic style, including APA 7th edition in-text citations and a reference list?

1. Research Design: Is the research design appropriate for the research questions or hypothesis?

2. Sample Size: Is the sample size adequate to provide reliable and valid results?

3. Sampling Method: Was the sampling method appropriate and unbiased?

4. Data Collection: Were the data collection methods suitable for the research objectives?

5. Instrumentation: Were the instruments or tools used for data collection valid and reliable?

6. Data Analysis: Were the data analysis techniques appropriate for the type of data collected?

7. Control Variables: Were control variables identified and accounted for in the study?

8. Ethical Considerations: Were ethical guidelines followed in the research process?

9. Replication: Can the study be replicated by other researchers?

10. Limitations: Were the limitations of the study acknowledged and addressed?

11. Validity: Does the study have internal and external validity?

12. Reliability: Are the results consistent and reproducible?

13. Generalizability: Can the findings be generalized to a larger population?

"Analyze the potential overall impact of the following article: [Article Text/URL]. Consider its likely reach, influence on public opinion, potential to spark discussion, and significance within its field or topic area."

"Identify the primary and secondary target audiences for this article: [Article Text/URL]. Predict their likely reactions, points of agreement or disagreement, and how the article might influence their perceptions or behaviors."

"Evaluate the potential for this article to go viral or spread widely online: [Article Text/URL]. Analyze factors like its title, topic relevance, emotional resonance, shareability, and the likely platforms where it might gain traction."

"Assess the potential policy or real-world implications stemming from the information or arguments presented in this article: [Article Text/URL]. Could it influence decision-makers, trigger regulatory changes, impact business strategies, or lead to specific actions? Explain why or why not."

"Analyze how this article: [Article Text/URL] might impact the reputation of its subject(s), the author, and the publishing outlet. Consider potential positive or negative effects on credibility, trust, and public perception."

"Identify the potential controversies or debates this article might ignite: [Article Text/URL]. Outline the main points of contention and the likely stakeholder groups or viewpoints that would engage in these discussions."

"Evaluate the potential impact of this article on the [Specify Industry, Academic Field, or Community] sector: [Article Text/URL]. How might it affect current practices, ongoing research, market trends, or internal discourse within this specific group?"

"Predict the likely range of emotional responses this article might evoke in readers: [Article Text/URL]. Analyze the tone, language, and subject matter to determine if it's likely to generate anger, empathy, curiosity, fear, hope, etc., and among which groups."

"Assess whether the impact of this article: [Article Text/URL] is likely to be short-term (a brief spike in discussion) or long-term (influencing understanding or discourse for months or years). Justify your reasoning based on the article's content and context."

"If the article contains an explicit or implicit call to action, analyze its potential effectiveness: [Article Text/URL]. How likely are readers to take the suggested action based on the arguments presented and the way the call to action is framed?"

This is my research purpose {research purpose} and this is my main question{main question} please do SMART analysis on this goal and question