Whites World Wide
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПублічний
Верифікація
Не верифікованийДовіреність
Не надійнийРозташування
МоваІнша
Дата створення каналуБер 17, 2021
Додано до TGlist
Вер 19, 2024Рекорди
19.09.202423:59
741Підписників19.09.202423:59
0Індекс цитування07.03.202523:59
44Охоплення 1 допису24.01.202517:25
40Охоп рекл. допису05.02.202522:19
25.00%ER07.03.202523:59
5.99%ERRПереслав з:
Tom Sewell Uncensored
06.04.202505:05
https://theopolisinstitute.com/leithart_post/enemies/
I was looking for an essay on how "irregular war measures it victories in its enemies defeats" and accidently stumbled across this very interesting essay which was a speech to the feds back in 2004 (clearly when they still employed high IQ White guys.)
It is written by quite a famous Christian philosopher who has written many books. Although I ultimately hold enmity towards its conclusion, because in my opinion it is entirely identical to the psychopathic liberal theology he positions himself against (as a third position to the inverse of liberal theology v Pagan heroism). In my opinion the only schism between his theory of how feds should treat their enemies (which is actually not communists or muslims anymore, its us) and how the liberal theocracy is now treating us is that they are showing their hatred (which ultimately unlocked our power) and are actually failing to be as psychopathically competent as Christian theologists serving the great Satan ZOG are.
One of the most concerning paragraphs is towards the end where this brand of ZOG/NSA Christian theology speaks of breaking down the enmity between Jew and Gentile (read as; Aryan Noble Bloodlines - from Latin Gens and later English Gentlemen - aristocratic). He suggests the wall is broken down by defeating "the enemy", I'll leave you to consider what that could imply.
Regardless, its worth reading, all the heavyweights get a mention.
I was looking for an essay on how "irregular war measures it victories in its enemies defeats" and accidently stumbled across this very interesting essay which was a speech to the feds back in 2004 (clearly when they still employed high IQ White guys.)
It is written by quite a famous Christian philosopher who has written many books. Although I ultimately hold enmity towards its conclusion, because in my opinion it is entirely identical to the psychopathic liberal theology he positions himself against (as a third position to the inverse of liberal theology v Pagan heroism). In my opinion the only schism between his theory of how feds should treat their enemies (which is actually not communists or muslims anymore, its us) and how the liberal theocracy is now treating us is that they are showing their hatred (which ultimately unlocked our power) and are actually failing to be as psychopathically competent as Christian theologists serving the great Satan ZOG are.
One of the most concerning paragraphs is towards the end where this brand of ZOG/NSA Christian theology speaks of breaking down the enmity between Jew and Gentile (read as; Aryan Noble Bloodlines - from Latin Gens and later English Gentlemen - aristocratic). He suggests the wall is broken down by defeating "the enemy", I'll leave you to consider what that could imply.
Regardless, its worth reading, all the heavyweights get a mention.
Переслав з:
Thuletide
27.03.202503:57
"Adolescence"
British media created a dramatized version of a real-life murder case and switched the Black murderer for an artistically-gifted, unathletic, gamer White boy.
They fabricated a background story in which the fictional White murderer was "radicalized online by redpill bros."
The mainstream media and British politicians are now blaming "incel culture" for the rise of knife crime in the UK, which is driven almost entirely by immigration.
British youth are significantly underrepresented among those prosecuted for possession of weapons aged 10-19.
British media created a dramatized version of a real-life murder case and switched the Black murderer for an artistically-gifted, unathletic, gamer White boy.
They fabricated a background story in which the fictional White murderer was "radicalized online by redpill bros."
The mainstream media and British politicians are now blaming "incel culture" for the rise of knife crime in the UK, which is driven almost entirely by immigration.
British youth are significantly underrepresented among those prosecuted for possession of weapons aged 10-19.
Переслав з:Tom Sewell Uncensored
05.04.202510:52
Victorian Libertarian member Liam Roche feels threatened by the existence of a real Nationalist Party on the ballot box and wants to know your names and addresses. Very Libertarian behaviour.
We aren't planning on registering anyone's details with the AEC yet, but we are 20% of the way there within just two days.
When we do register we will send out an instruction form along side the AEC form to ensure you become a "silent voter", meaning freaks like Liam or antifa can't look up your address.
Furthermore, the Libertarians have been a registered party for 25 years and have 2 state MPs (out of 200+) and 0 federal seats (out of 230). They were recently outvoted by the destroy paedophiles party in WA.
We aren't planning on registering anyone's details with the AEC yet, but we are 20% of the way there within just two days.
When we do register we will send out an instruction form along side the AEC form to ensure you become a "silent voter", meaning freaks like Liam or antifa can't look up your address.
Furthermore, the Libertarians have been a registered party for 25 years and have 2 state MPs (out of 200+) and 0 federal seats (out of 230). They were recently outvoted by the destroy paedophiles party in WA.
Переслав з:
Joel Davis
22.03.202506:35
National Socialism isn't simply about keeping your country White, it's about liberating your nation from the parasitism of international finance.
The reason Australia today is being flooded with non-White immigrants isn't just because of ideological subversion, as despite this subversion mass immigration is still massively unpopular. This unpopularity doesn't matter because its supported by the financial and corporate interests which benefit from mass immigration (most of whom are either foreign-owned themselves or at least dependent upon foreign investment).
Economic sovereignty is political sovereignty, you can't have one without the other.
The reason Australia today is being flooded with non-White immigrants isn't just because of ideological subversion, as despite this subversion mass immigration is still massively unpopular. This unpopularity doesn't matter because its supported by the financial and corporate interests which benefit from mass immigration (most of whom are either foreign-owned themselves or at least dependent upon foreign investment).
Economic sovereignty is political sovereignty, you can't have one without the other.
05.04.202501:02
"This tweet hits on a bigger point. American society is centered around niggers and not necessarily our worship of them. Almost everything we do is because of niggers.
We live in the suburbs and have to drive everywhere and have no walkable city because the cities are filled with niggers.
We hate public transport because it'll be filled with niggers.
Americans try to earn as much money as they can so they can live in a nigger-free neighborhood.
We are obsessed with guns because we have to protect ourselves from niggers.
The number metric of how good/bad a school is, is simply how many niggers are there."
We live in the suburbs and have to drive everywhere and have no walkable city because the cities are filled with niggers.
We hate public transport because it'll be filled with niggers.
Americans try to earn as much money as they can so they can live in a nigger-free neighborhood.
We are obsessed with guns because we have to protect ourselves from niggers.
The number metric of how good/bad a school is, is simply how many niggers are there."
Переслав з:Joel Davis
03.04.202503:38
The by far most extreme hate speech laws in Australian history now look set to pass in Victoria. The Liberal Party demanded the exemption for communication "with genuine political purpose" in the original proposed legislation be removed in order to support the bill, the Labor Party complied and removed this exemption even though it renders these laws explicitly unconstitutional. Jewish leaders immediately praised the political communication exemption being removed because they want their political opponents thrown in prison for "antisemitism".
The Liberals are still refusing to back the bill, but Labor have now secured a deal with the Greens to pass it, and the political communication exemption has not been added back in. So the Liberals can now pretend they were on the side of free speech even though they were instrumental in destroying the most important protection for it this bill had. Do not fall for their fake "pro free speech" spin, these traitors ensured the Jews got what they wanted here. The criminal aspect of these new laws are set to come into effect in September.
https://archive.is/k40MT
The Liberals are still refusing to back the bill, but Labor have now secured a deal with the Greens to pass it, and the political communication exemption has not been added back in. So the Liberals can now pretend they were on the side of free speech even though they were instrumental in destroying the most important protection for it this bill had. Do not fall for their fake "pro free speech" spin, these traitors ensured the Jews got what they wanted here. The criminal aspect of these new laws are set to come into effect in September.
https://archive.is/k40MT
Переслав з:
Noticer News
03.04.202523:10
Australia's largest nationalist group has announced plans to form a political party and is signing up supporters.
Leader Thomas Sewell said the group was fighting back against government censorship and political repression.
https://www.noticer.news/australian-nationalist-political-party/
Follow: @NoticerNews
Leader Thomas Sewell said the group was fighting back against government censorship and political repression.
https://www.noticer.news/australian-nationalist-political-party/
Follow: @NoticerNews
Переслав з:Joel Davis
22.03.202506:35
Aarvoll cooked with this post
https://x.com/Aarvoll_/status/1901821202559103000
https://x.com/Aarvoll_/status/1901821202559103000
05.04.202503:21
Community Relations Service
>Title X of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, established the Community Relations Service with the mandate to offer “conciliation assistance” to communities where “ disputes, disagreements, or difficulties” threaten “peaceful relations among the citizens of the community involved” regarding “discriminatory practices based on race, color, or national origin.”
>its primary purpose is to help communities resolve racial tension and civil unrest without resorting to violence or litigation
>https://www.justice.gov/crs
They move in immediately, giving white families a script to memorize in exchange for money from a partnered NGO. That's why they always cuck out in humiliating fashion.
>Title X of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, established the Community Relations Service with the mandate to offer “conciliation assistance” to communities where “ disputes, disagreements, or difficulties” threaten “peaceful relations among the citizens of the community involved” regarding “discriminatory practices based on race, color, or national origin.”
>its primary purpose is to help communities resolve racial tension and civil unrest without resorting to violence or litigation
>https://www.justice.gov/crs
They move in immediately, giving white families a script to memorize in exchange for money from a partnered NGO. That's why they always cuck out in humiliating fashion.
Переслав з:
European Australian Movement
03.04.202503:38
Our new @WhiteAusBot now has a feature which enables you to apply as a supporter of our organisation. We are signing up everyone, including members, partners, families, etc. The AEC requires 1500 member signatures to register as a party.
Sign up as a supporter by using the bot, selecting SUPPORTER, then POLITICAL, and provide your details to become one of that first 1500 people.
You will also receive future updates via email and text about optional local supporter events like barbeques, cultural events and political seminars.
The details must be legitimate and you must be an enrolled Australian voter. This project of beginning a political party will help our organisation gain political protection, and strengthen our political speech and activism projects in Australia.
Sign up as a supporter by using the bot, selecting SUPPORTER, then POLITICAL, and provide your details to become one of that first 1500 people.
You will also receive future updates via email and text about optional local supporter events like barbeques, cultural events and political seminars.
The details must be legitimate and you must be an enrolled Australian voter. This project of beginning a political party will help our organisation gain political protection, and strengthen our political speech and activism projects in Australia.
Переслав з:Tom Sewell Uncensored
25.03.202511:37
https://odysee.com/@Thomas_Sewell:e/55:1c
Going Live in 10 minutes.
Will cover a group project that is being built for a specific Racist Aesthetic style.
As you know we have a lot of projects in the works but one that is now being focused on is a central bottleneck to every other project, which is a clearly defined aesthetic style for White Australia, and perhaps it could help influence politics and culture in our global racial scene.
Going Live in 10 minutes.
Will cover a group project that is being built for a specific Racist Aesthetic style.
As you know we have a lot of projects in the works but one that is now being focused on is a central bottleneck to every other project, which is a clearly defined aesthetic style for White Australia, and perhaps it could help influence politics and culture in our global racial scene.
Переслав з:Joel Davis
31.03.202506:41
This was yet another great example of how controversy (counter-intuitively for many) works in favour of dissidents under the current political paradigm.
The mainstream media generally ignores dissident activists on right end of the spectrum unless they can slander us. The labelling of Lawrence McIntyre as an "extremist" with ties to "neo-nazis" because there's a photo of him with Blair and I only fueled their coverage, as well as the sizeable public response defending him.
Controversy drives clicks and debate, it sucks everyone in on both sides. Politics which avoids controversy is boring and only serves the status quo, if you want to challenge the status quo however you need to embrace controversy and the power it holds. Controversy is our friend.
The mainstream media generally ignores dissident activists on right end of the spectrum unless they can slander us. The labelling of Lawrence McIntyre as an "extremist" with ties to "neo-nazis" because there's a photo of him with Blair and I only fueled their coverage, as well as the sizeable public response defending him.
Controversy drives clicks and debate, it sucks everyone in on both sides. Politics which avoids controversy is boring and only serves the status quo, if you want to challenge the status quo however you need to embrace controversy and the power it holds. Controversy is our friend.
Переслав з:Joel Davis
01.04.202511:23
The talking points of leftists who deny the racial foundation of Australian identity are insanely weak. I just watched these two recent youtube videos (which you can find here and here) put out by lefty fags which are mostly full of non-arguments, but insofar as they make anything resembling an argument they are easy to dismantle.
"0.05% of the ANZACs were Chinese, the experience of the diggers in WWI had nothing to do with race"
Yeah so Billy Hughes (the prime minister at the time) said "I bid you go and fight for White Australia in France" because it absolutely wasn't about race lol? The Returned Sailors and Soldiers Imperial League of Australia (the by far largest veterans organisation in Australia, which became rebranded as the RSL after WWII) was the staunchest advocate of the White Australia Policy in Australian society because it absolutely wasn't about race lol?
"The English and Irish used to have ethnic and religious tensions with each other in Australia, but now we're all just Aussies so this proves that being Australian has nothing to do with your ethnic background"
Yeah so the project of fusing the English and Irish (two extremely genetically similar ethnic groups) into one people under the principle that we belong to the same race ultimately worked, which was the fundamental principle of the White Nationalist nation building project that founded Australia. This is an argument for White Nationalism constitutively defining what it means to be Australian, not an argument against it.
"Southern and Eastern European immigrants came to Australia after WWII and even though Aussies were so racist at the time that they barely considered them White, they ultimately helped build modern Australia and have somewhat assimilated over time"
Yeah so the argument here is that other members of the White race ended up being decent immigrants and that therefore the race of immigrants isn't important lmao? So your go to defense of immigration in Australian history is European, and this is somehow supposed to be an argument in defense of non-European immigration lol?
It's telling that the difficulty of trying to mix different European ethnicities is cited as a reason for why we should take on the far more difficult task of mixing literally every race on the planet. These idiots refute themselves implicitly with their own arguments.
"Skin colour isn't what defines Australians, random consumer objects like our most popular beer brands and the use of bins with wheels on them are far more integral to our national identity"
This isn't even an argument, but its an absurd assertion which implies the unscientific notion that race simply pertains to skin colour rather than the entire genetic composition of a human being. The largest racial distinctions have to do with genes that code for how our brains are structured, skin colour is a superficial marker of far more profound differences.
The biological similarity of a people at the genetic level is so obviously way more significant than what types of beers they like or what bins they use, that you could only think otherwise if you were so blinded by ideology that you're incapable of rational thought about the subject.
"The Australian working class often battled with wealthy interests politically and this proves that Australia had no coherent national identity"
The existence of distinct economic class interests causing political conflict doesn't refute the existence of a shared national identity, this is a ridiculous argument. Every nation and political system ever will have some degree of conflict between distinct economic interests within it. But the fact that the only thing the Left and Right seemed to be able to agree upon during the period just prior to and after Australia's founding was racism and the idea of the White Australia Policy, which this Marxist fag himself admits in his own video, completely destroys this argument.
"0.05% of the ANZACs were Chinese, the experience of the diggers in WWI had nothing to do with race"
Yeah so Billy Hughes (the prime minister at the time) said "I bid you go and fight for White Australia in France" because it absolutely wasn't about race lol? The Returned Sailors and Soldiers Imperial League of Australia (the by far largest veterans organisation in Australia, which became rebranded as the RSL after WWII) was the staunchest advocate of the White Australia Policy in Australian society because it absolutely wasn't about race lol?
"The English and Irish used to have ethnic and religious tensions with each other in Australia, but now we're all just Aussies so this proves that being Australian has nothing to do with your ethnic background"
Yeah so the project of fusing the English and Irish (two extremely genetically similar ethnic groups) into one people under the principle that we belong to the same race ultimately worked, which was the fundamental principle of the White Nationalist nation building project that founded Australia. This is an argument for White Nationalism constitutively defining what it means to be Australian, not an argument against it.
"Southern and Eastern European immigrants came to Australia after WWII and even though Aussies were so racist at the time that they barely considered them White, they ultimately helped build modern Australia and have somewhat assimilated over time"
Yeah so the argument here is that other members of the White race ended up being decent immigrants and that therefore the race of immigrants isn't important lmao? So your go to defense of immigration in Australian history is European, and this is somehow supposed to be an argument in defense of non-European immigration lol?
It's telling that the difficulty of trying to mix different European ethnicities is cited as a reason for why we should take on the far more difficult task of mixing literally every race on the planet. These idiots refute themselves implicitly with their own arguments.
"Skin colour isn't what defines Australians, random consumer objects like our most popular beer brands and the use of bins with wheels on them are far more integral to our national identity"
This isn't even an argument, but its an absurd assertion which implies the unscientific notion that race simply pertains to skin colour rather than the entire genetic composition of a human being. The largest racial distinctions have to do with genes that code for how our brains are structured, skin colour is a superficial marker of far more profound differences.
The biological similarity of a people at the genetic level is so obviously way more significant than what types of beers they like or what bins they use, that you could only think otherwise if you were so blinded by ideology that you're incapable of rational thought about the subject.
"The Australian working class often battled with wealthy interests politically and this proves that Australia had no coherent national identity"
The existence of distinct economic class interests causing political conflict doesn't refute the existence of a shared national identity, this is a ridiculous argument. Every nation and political system ever will have some degree of conflict between distinct economic interests within it. But the fact that the only thing the Left and Right seemed to be able to agree upon during the period just prior to and after Australia's founding was racism and the idea of the White Australia Policy, which this Marxist fag himself admits in his own video, completely destroys this argument.
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.
