The Globe Is DEAD!!!!🐻
06.03.202507:11
Brain's Logic -
Mt Everest....Not on a Globe....
A Video Detailing how the Measurement of Angular Size PROVES the Earth is Flat....
https://youtube.com/@brianslogic?si=Pt1NhFU9GAdqqOBW
Mt Everest....Not on a Globe....
A Video Detailing how the Measurement of Angular Size PROVES the Earth is Flat....
https://youtube.com/@brianslogic?si=Pt1NhFU9GAdqqOBW
05.03.202501:00
Gravity Destoryed By MIT Professor
Переслав з:
🍚尺工匚乇乃口山乚 丂口匚工乇丅丫🍚☦️
25.02.202523:38
1958 Encyclopedia of Britannica
#SpaceIsFake
#FlatEarth
#SpaceIsFake
#FlatEarth
Переслав з:
The Paranormies Present
05.03.202522:44
Nathan Oakley | Flat Earth Debate 2294 LIVE AI Agrees Earth is Flat
The discussion with the AI is terrific but the even better part is Nathan saying the N-wurd at 49:28 😆😆 (and two more times after that)
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
The discussion with the AI is terrific but the even better part is Nathan saying the N-wurd at 49:28 😆😆 (and two more times after that)
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
05.03.202500:07
We've Never Left Low Earth Orbit!???🤣
Переслав з:
Arkham Farms
25.02.202523:24
1833 - Apocalyptic Skies
The firmament was one solid glare of fire and light and it looked as though every star in the sky was falling to the ground, and they were certain the day of judgment was at hand.
Via https://t.me/flatearththeist
𝕬𝖗𝖐𝖍𝖆𝖒 𝕱𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖘
The firmament was one solid glare of fire and light and it looked as though every star in the sky was falling to the ground, and they were certain the day of judgment was at hand.
Via https://t.me/flatearththeist
𝕬𝖗𝖐𝖍𝖆𝖒 𝕱𝖆𝖗𝖒𝖘
Переслав з:The Paranormies Present
05.03.202522:43
So is Venus in front of the moon, or behind it?
lmao
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
lmao
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
05.03.202500:04
The Bible Isnt A Science Book Yet Its More Accurate Than Any Science Book🎯💯KayPodgee On TikTok
Переслав з:The Paranormies Present
22.02.202504:35
Nathan Oakley | Flat Earth Debate 2284 LIVE STOP USING OUR STUFF! Politics Server
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
Переслав з:The Paranormies Present
05.03.202522:43
The Scientific Method:
Core Steps of the Scientific Method
1. Observation and Question: Scientists observe a naturally occuring phenomenon and formulate specific questions about it.
2. Hypothesis Formation: Based on observations, scientists develop a testable hypothesis—a proposed explanation that makes specific predictions.
3. Experimentation: Scientists design and conduct controlled experiments to test the hypothesis, gathering empirical data.
4. Analysis and Conclusion: Scientists analyze the experimental data to determine whether it supports or refutes the hypothesis, and draw appropriate conclusions.
(5. Communication and Refinement: Scientists publish their findings for peer review, allowing others to replicate experiments and refine hypotheses through further testing.) <=Not really necessary imo. As the scientific method, if performed correctly, either proves or disproves something, definitively.
Components of a Well-Formed Hypothesis
A proper scientific hypothesis must be:
1. Falsifiable: Must be capable of being proven wrong through experimentation.
2. Precise: Must make specific predictions about what will happen under defined conditions.
3. Variable-Focused: Must clearly identify:
The independent variable (what the researcher manipulates or changes)
The dependent variable (what the researcher measures as a result)
The proposed relationship between these variables ("If X changes, then Y will respond in Z way")
4. Controllable: Must account for:
Control groups to provide a baseline comparison
Controlled variables (factors kept constant throughout the experiment)
Potential confounding variables that might affect results
5. Explanatory: Must propose a causal mechanism that explains the observed phenomenon.
6. Parsimonious: Should be the simplest explanation consistent with existing knowledge.
The identification of variables and controls is essential to proper experimental design and is foundational to the scientific method's ability to establish causation rather than merely correlation. Without these elements, a hypothesis lacks the structure needed for rigorous testing.
So in conclusion, most pseudoscientists fail to employ the scientific method in the second step (and often in the first step!!). If the independent variable does not exist or cannot be controlled and manipulated by the observer, then it isn’t following the scientific method!!
So there goes ALL of astronomy, astrophysics and theoretical physics. Oops!
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
Core Steps of the Scientific Method
1. Observation and Question: Scientists observe a naturally occuring phenomenon and formulate specific questions about it.
2. Hypothesis Formation: Based on observations, scientists develop a testable hypothesis—a proposed explanation that makes specific predictions.
3. Experimentation: Scientists design and conduct controlled experiments to test the hypothesis, gathering empirical data.
4. Analysis and Conclusion: Scientists analyze the experimental data to determine whether it supports or refutes the hypothesis, and draw appropriate conclusions.
(5. Communication and Refinement: Scientists publish their findings for peer review, allowing others to replicate experiments and refine hypotheses through further testing.) <=Not really necessary imo. As the scientific method, if performed correctly, either proves or disproves something, definitively.
Components of a Well-Formed Hypothesis
A proper scientific hypothesis must be:
1. Falsifiable: Must be capable of being proven wrong through experimentation.
2. Precise: Must make specific predictions about what will happen under defined conditions.
3. Variable-Focused: Must clearly identify:
The independent variable (what the researcher manipulates or changes)
The dependent variable (what the researcher measures as a result)
The proposed relationship between these variables ("If X changes, then Y will respond in Z way")
4. Controllable: Must account for:
Control groups to provide a baseline comparison
Controlled variables (factors kept constant throughout the experiment)
Potential confounding variables that might affect results
5. Explanatory: Must propose a causal mechanism that explains the observed phenomenon.
6. Parsimonious: Should be the simplest explanation consistent with existing knowledge.
The identification of variables and controls is essential to proper experimental design and is foundational to the scientific method's ability to establish causation rather than merely correlation. Without these elements, a hypothesis lacks the structure needed for rigorous testing.
So in conclusion, most pseudoscientists fail to employ the scientific method in the second step (and often in the first step!!). If the independent variable does not exist or cannot be controlled and manipulated by the observer, then it isn’t following the scientific method!!
So there goes ALL of astronomy, astrophysics and theoretical physics. Oops!
@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48
Переслав з:🍚尺工匚乇乃口山乚 丂口匚工乇丅丫🍚☦️
25.02.202523:39
Shadows diverging. Only happens on a flat earth.
#FlatEarth
#SpaceIsFake
#FlatEarth
#SpaceIsFake
Показано 1 - 1 із 1
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.