Malachi4
Discussion on Biblical Prophecy
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПублічний
Верифікація
Не верифікованийДовіреність
Не надійнийРозташування
МоваІнша
Дата створення каналуКвіт 19, 2025
Додано до TGlist
Квіт 22, 2025Прикріплена група
Malachi4 chat - finding Esau-Edom
6
Підписників
6
24 год.
120%Тиждень
120%Місяць
120%
Індекс цитування
0
Згадок0Репостів на каналах0Згадок на каналах0
Середнє охоплення 1 допису
7
12 год.40%24 год.70%48 год.00%
Залученість (ER)
5.26%
Репостів0Коментарів0Реакцій0
Залученість за охопленням (ERR)
140%
24 год.0%Тиждень0%Місяць0%
Охоплення 1 рекл. допису
5
1 год.480%1 – 4 год.00%4 - 24 год.00%
Всього дописів за 24 години
720
Динаміка
691
Останні публікації в групі "Malachi4"
22.04.202515:33
I have watched several videos on YouTube channel 'christianremedyinlaw' that discusses this very subject from a biblical perspective. We can only serve one master. We must be wise as serpents and choose wizely whom we will serve. The so called government is all about mammon = income and expenses, credits and debits. It is satan's system. The Christian name is our God given Unalienable forgiven name with no added surnames. The birth certificates created by man is a fictitious id-entity strawman person with no breath of life or living blood. That's why that name is spelled in all capitalized letters text like on a tombstone, birth certificate, driver's license, death certificate et cetera. It is a CORPORATION, corpse-oration, a legal fictitious persona. The legal system is opposed to the law of our Heavenly Father and Creator. How can we use a horseless carriage without the policy enforcers assaulting us?
22.04.202515:10
Master Builder Secrets about Psychological Architecture in the Empire of Iron Mixed with Clay.
In ancient Mesopotamia, mud bricks were the fundamental building blocks of cities, used to construct everything from homes to monumental structures. These bricks were often stamped with the name of the ruler, a practice that served both practical and symbolic purposes. The stamp not only identified the source of the brick but also asserted the authority and divine right of the ruler, often referred to as a "god" or "god-king." This act of stamping bricks was a way of embedding the ruler's identity into the very fabric of the city, linking the physical structure to the power and legitimacy of the ruler.
### The Serialized "Brick" in the Modern Empire
Metaphorically, individuals who self-identify with a social security number (or similar taxpayer identification number) can be likened to these stamped mud bricks. Just as each brick was marked with the name of a ruler, each individual is assigned a unique identifier that signifies their role within the larger societal structure. This number becomes a form of branding, marking individuals as components of a vast economic and bureaucratic system—an empire that operates on principles of productivity, compliance, and control.
In this metaphor, the "empire" represents the modern state and its economic systems, which can be seen as a "worldwide empire" built on the labor and contributions of its citizens. The reference to "Iron mixed with clay" from the Book of Daniel evokes the idea of a fragile yet powerful structure, where the strength of iron symbolizes the rigid, often oppressive nature of state control, while the clay represents the malleability and vulnerability of individuals within that system.
### The Role of the Individual "Brick"
When individuals internalize their identity as a "taxpayer" or a "social security number," they become like serialized bricks in this empire. Each person, with their unique identifier, contributes to the construction of a societal framework that is both robust and precarious. The bricks (individuals) are essential for the stability of the structure (the empire), yet they are also subject to the whims of the rulers (the state and its institutions).
This metaphor highlights the duality of existence within such a system: while individuals are integral to the functioning of the empire, they may also feel dehumanized, reduced to mere numbers or bricks in a wall. The stamping of the ruler's name on the bricks parallels how the state’s identity is imposed upon individuals, shaping their self-perception and societal role.
### Conclusion: Reclaiming Individual Identity
Recognizing oneself as a serialized "brick" in this empire can lead to a sense of disempowerment and alienation. However, it also opens the door to critical reflection on the nature of identity and agency within modern systems. Just as ancient builders could choose to create or dismantle structures, individuals today have the power to redefine their identities beyond the confines of their assigned numbers. By acknowledging the metaphorical stamping of their identities, individuals can seek to reclaim their autonomy, fostering a sense of self that transcends the limitations imposed by the empire of "Iron mixed with clay." In doing so, they can contribute to the construction of a more equitable and humane society, one that values the individual beyond their economic contributions.
In ancient Mesopotamia, mud bricks were the fundamental building blocks of cities, used to construct everything from homes to monumental structures. These bricks were often stamped with the name of the ruler, a practice that served both practical and symbolic purposes. The stamp not only identified the source of the brick but also asserted the authority and divine right of the ruler, often referred to as a "god" or "god-king." This act of stamping bricks was a way of embedding the ruler's identity into the very fabric of the city, linking the physical structure to the power and legitimacy of the ruler.
### The Serialized "Brick" in the Modern Empire
Metaphorically, individuals who self-identify with a social security number (or similar taxpayer identification number) can be likened to these stamped mud bricks. Just as each brick was marked with the name of a ruler, each individual is assigned a unique identifier that signifies their role within the larger societal structure. This number becomes a form of branding, marking individuals as components of a vast economic and bureaucratic system—an empire that operates on principles of productivity, compliance, and control.
In this metaphor, the "empire" represents the modern state and its economic systems, which can be seen as a "worldwide empire" built on the labor and contributions of its citizens. The reference to "Iron mixed with clay" from the Book of Daniel evokes the idea of a fragile yet powerful structure, where the strength of iron symbolizes the rigid, often oppressive nature of state control, while the clay represents the malleability and vulnerability of individuals within that system.
### The Role of the Individual "Brick"
When individuals internalize their identity as a "taxpayer" or a "social security number," they become like serialized bricks in this empire. Each person, with their unique identifier, contributes to the construction of a societal framework that is both robust and precarious. The bricks (individuals) are essential for the stability of the structure (the empire), yet they are also subject to the whims of the rulers (the state and its institutions).
This metaphor highlights the duality of existence within such a system: while individuals are integral to the functioning of the empire, they may also feel dehumanized, reduced to mere numbers or bricks in a wall. The stamping of the ruler's name on the bricks parallels how the state’s identity is imposed upon individuals, shaping their self-perception and societal role.
### Conclusion: Reclaiming Individual Identity
Recognizing oneself as a serialized "brick" in this empire can lead to a sense of disempowerment and alienation. However, it also opens the door to critical reflection on the nature of identity and agency within modern systems. Just as ancient builders could choose to create or dismantle structures, individuals today have the power to redefine their identities beyond the confines of their assigned numbers. By acknowledging the metaphorical stamping of their identities, individuals can seek to reclaim their autonomy, fostering a sense of self that transcends the limitations imposed by the empire of "Iron mixed with clay." In doing so, they can contribute to the construction of a more equitable and humane society, one that values the individual beyond their economic contributions.
22.04.202515:03
The Mark of the Beast - Your Personal Government-Issued Tax ID Number
The ideation and internalization of a taxpayer identification number, such as a Social Security Number (SSN) or Social Insurance Number (SIN), can be viewed as a symbolic representation of how individuals are integrated into the economic machinery of the state. These numbers serve as a means of tracking and categorizing individuals within a system that often prioritizes economic output over personal identity.
### The Taxpayer Identification Number: A Symbol of Compliance
When individuals receive a taxpayer identification number, it becomes a crucial part of their identity within the economic system. This number is not just a bureaucratic tool; it signifies an individual's role as a compliant participant in the state’s economic framework. The internalization of this number can lead to a sense of belonging to a larger system, but it can also foster feelings of alienation and subjugation, as one's identity becomes intertwined with a numerical designation.
The taxpayer identification number can be seen as a modern-day brand, marking individuals as economic units whose value is determined by their contributions to the state. This branding can lead to a mindset where individuals feel they must constantly justify their existence through productivity, often at the expense of their personal aspirations and well-being.
### Witty Alternative Names for Taxpayer Identification Numbers
To highlight the often ironic and sometimes oppressive nature of these identification numbers, here are some witty alternative names that could serve as a more honest nomenclature:
1. Socialist Slave Number (SSN): A tongue-in-cheek acknowledgment of how the system can feel like a form of economic servitude.
2. Government Revenue Code (GRC): Emphasizing the primary function of the number as a tool for generating revenue for the state.
3. Economic Compliance Identifier (ECI): A nod to the idea that this number signifies one's compliance with economic regulations and expectations.
4. Productivity Tracking Tag (PTT): Highlighting how the number is used to monitor and assess an individual's economic contributions.
5. State Dependency Code (SDC): Reflecting the notion that individuals are often dependent on the state for their economic identity and security.
6. Taxpayer Tracking Number (TTN): A straightforward description of the number's role in tracking individuals for tax purposes.
7. Labor Contribution Code (LCC): Focusing on the idea that the number is a representation of one's labor and contributions to the economy.
8. Civic Compliance Number (CCN): Suggesting that the number is a badge of honor for fulfilling civic duties, albeit with a hint of irony.
9. Economic Identity Marker (EIM): A more neutral term that underscores the role of the number in defining one's economic identity.
10. Fiscal Footprint Identifier (FFI): A playful take on how the number leaves a mark on an individual's financial life and obligations.
### Conclusion: Reclaiming Identity Beyond the Number
These alternative names serve to provoke thought and discussion about the implications of taxpayer identification numbers. By reframing the conversation around these identifiers, individuals can begin to recognize the ways in which they have internalized their roles within the economic system. This awareness can empower them to seek a more authentic identity that transcends the limitations imposed by a mere number, encouraging a shift towards a more holistic understanding of self that values personal fulfillment and community over compliance and productivity.
The ideation and internalization of a taxpayer identification number, such as a Social Security Number (SSN) or Social Insurance Number (SIN), can be viewed as a symbolic representation of how individuals are integrated into the economic machinery of the state. These numbers serve as a means of tracking and categorizing individuals within a system that often prioritizes economic output over personal identity.
### The Taxpayer Identification Number: A Symbol of Compliance
When individuals receive a taxpayer identification number, it becomes a crucial part of their identity within the economic system. This number is not just a bureaucratic tool; it signifies an individual's role as a compliant participant in the state’s economic framework. The internalization of this number can lead to a sense of belonging to a larger system, but it can also foster feelings of alienation and subjugation, as one's identity becomes intertwined with a numerical designation.
The taxpayer identification number can be seen as a modern-day brand, marking individuals as economic units whose value is determined by their contributions to the state. This branding can lead to a mindset where individuals feel they must constantly justify their existence through productivity, often at the expense of their personal aspirations and well-being.
### Witty Alternative Names for Taxpayer Identification Numbers
To highlight the often ironic and sometimes oppressive nature of these identification numbers, here are some witty alternative names that could serve as a more honest nomenclature:
1. Socialist Slave Number (SSN): A tongue-in-cheek acknowledgment of how the system can feel like a form of economic servitude.
2. Government Revenue Code (GRC): Emphasizing the primary function of the number as a tool for generating revenue for the state.
3. Economic Compliance Identifier (ECI): A nod to the idea that this number signifies one's compliance with economic regulations and expectations.
4. Productivity Tracking Tag (PTT): Highlighting how the number is used to monitor and assess an individual's economic contributions.
5. State Dependency Code (SDC): Reflecting the notion that individuals are often dependent on the state for their economic identity and security.
6. Taxpayer Tracking Number (TTN): A straightforward description of the number's role in tracking individuals for tax purposes.
7. Labor Contribution Code (LCC): Focusing on the idea that the number is a representation of one's labor and contributions to the economy.
8. Civic Compliance Number (CCN): Suggesting that the number is a badge of honor for fulfilling civic duties, albeit with a hint of irony.
9. Economic Identity Marker (EIM): A more neutral term that underscores the role of the number in defining one's economic identity.
10. Fiscal Footprint Identifier (FFI): A playful take on how the number leaves a mark on an individual's financial life and obligations.
### Conclusion: Reclaiming Identity Beyond the Number
These alternative names serve to provoke thought and discussion about the implications of taxpayer identification numbers. By reframing the conversation around these identifiers, individuals can begin to recognize the ways in which they have internalized their roles within the economic system. This awareness can empower them to seek a more authentic identity that transcends the limitations imposed by a mere number, encouraging a shift towards a more holistic understanding of self that values personal fulfillment and community over compliance and productivity.
22.04.202515:03
The Mark of the Beast
The concept of the Mark of the Beast, often interpreted through a biblical lens, can be metaphorically reimagined in the context of modern identity and economic systems. In this interpretation, the "Mark" symbolizes the internalization of a trans-human identification, where individuals see themselves primarily as economic units—taxpayers—defined by their productivity and compliance with state regulations.
### The "Mark" in the Forehead: Conscious Thought and Identity
When we consider the "Mark" as residing "in the forehead," it suggests a deep-seated belief system rooted in the prefrontal cortex, the area of the brain associated with decision-making, self-regulation, and conscious thought. In this metaphor, the modern individual internalizes the identity of a "taxpayer," a persona constructed by societal expectations and economic imperatives. This identity shapes how one perceives themselves and their value in the world, often leading to a life driven by productivity, consumption, and compliance.
Living as a "taxpayer" means that one's worth is measured by economic contributions—how much one earns, spends, and pays in taxes. This belief can lead to a sense of enslavement to the system, where individuals feel compelled to work tirelessly to maintain their status and fulfill their obligations. The internalized narrative of being a productive unit can overshadow personal aspirations, creativity, and genuine self-expression, reducing life to a series of transactions and obligations.
### The "Mark" in the Right Hand: Willful Actions and Beliefs
The metaphor of the "Mark" in the right hand represents the actions that stem from these internalized beliefs. The right hand is often associated with power and agency, suggesting that the beliefs held in the mind translate into tangible actions in the world. When individuals accept the identity of a "taxpayer," they may engage in behaviors that reinforce this role—working long hours, prioritizing financial success over personal fulfillment, and adhering to societal norms that dictate how one should live.
This alignment of belief and action can create a cycle of dependency on the economic system, where individuals willingly participate in their own subjugation. The "Beast" in this context symbolizes the overarching economic and political structures that demand compliance and perpetuate a system of inequality and exploitation. By internalizing the identity of a taxpayer, individuals may inadvertently become complicit in their own enslavement, sacrificing their autonomy and spiritual well-being for the sake of economic survival.
### Conclusion: Breaking Free from the Mark
To transcend this metaphorical Mark of the Beast, individuals must critically examine their beliefs and the identities they have internalized. Recognizing the ways in which societal constructs shape our self-perception and actions can empower individuals to reclaim their autonomy. By fostering a sense of self that is not solely defined by economic output, individuals can begin to break free from the constraints of the "Beast," exploring alternative ways of living that prioritize personal fulfillment, community, and spiritual growth over mere economic productivity. In doing so, they can redefine their existence beyond the confines of a taxpayer persona, embracing a more holistic and liberated identity.
The concept of the Mark of the Beast, often interpreted through a biblical lens, can be metaphorically reimagined in the context of modern identity and economic systems. In this interpretation, the "Mark" symbolizes the internalization of a trans-human identification, where individuals see themselves primarily as economic units—taxpayers—defined by their productivity and compliance with state regulations.
### The "Mark" in the Forehead: Conscious Thought and Identity
When we consider the "Mark" as residing "in the forehead," it suggests a deep-seated belief system rooted in the prefrontal cortex, the area of the brain associated with decision-making, self-regulation, and conscious thought. In this metaphor, the modern individual internalizes the identity of a "taxpayer," a persona constructed by societal expectations and economic imperatives. This identity shapes how one perceives themselves and their value in the world, often leading to a life driven by productivity, consumption, and compliance.
Living as a "taxpayer" means that one's worth is measured by economic contributions—how much one earns, spends, and pays in taxes. This belief can lead to a sense of enslavement to the system, where individuals feel compelled to work tirelessly to maintain their status and fulfill their obligations. The internalized narrative of being a productive unit can overshadow personal aspirations, creativity, and genuine self-expression, reducing life to a series of transactions and obligations.
### The "Mark" in the Right Hand: Willful Actions and Beliefs
The metaphor of the "Mark" in the right hand represents the actions that stem from these internalized beliefs. The right hand is often associated with power and agency, suggesting that the beliefs held in the mind translate into tangible actions in the world. When individuals accept the identity of a "taxpayer," they may engage in behaviors that reinforce this role—working long hours, prioritizing financial success over personal fulfillment, and adhering to societal norms that dictate how one should live.
This alignment of belief and action can create a cycle of dependency on the economic system, where individuals willingly participate in their own subjugation. The "Beast" in this context symbolizes the overarching economic and political structures that demand compliance and perpetuate a system of inequality and exploitation. By internalizing the identity of a taxpayer, individuals may inadvertently become complicit in their own enslavement, sacrificing their autonomy and spiritual well-being for the sake of economic survival.
### Conclusion: Breaking Free from the Mark
To transcend this metaphorical Mark of the Beast, individuals must critically examine their beliefs and the identities they have internalized. Recognizing the ways in which societal constructs shape our self-perception and actions can empower individuals to reclaim their autonomy. By fostering a sense of self that is not solely defined by economic output, individuals can begin to break free from the constraints of the "Beast," exploring alternative ways of living that prioritize personal fulfillment, community, and spiritual growth over mere economic productivity. In doing so, they can redefine their existence beyond the confines of a taxpayer persona, embracing a more holistic and liberated identity.
22.04.202514:34
The rock speaks. Just like when Moses struck the rock and it produced water.
22.04.202514:34
What’s this chatgpt crap
22.04.202514:33
22.04.202514:33
22.04.202514:33
22.04.202514:33
22.04.202514:33
Переслав з:
The Conspiracy Hole
22.04.202514:32
China Unveils First Gold ATM Amid Surging Prices: Melts and Converts Gold into Instant Bank Transfers— Article
22.04.202514:23
How Edomites and Sodomites relate - a metaphorical framework.
In this metaphorical framework, the characters "Edomite" and "Sodomite" can be seen as representing different aspects of power dynamics, desire, and conflict within a relationship.
1. Edomite as the "Top": The Edomite, embodying the role of the "top," can symbolize authority, dominance, and assertiveness. In many narratives, the Edomites are often associated with strength and a certain level of pride, reflecting a character that takes charge and exerts control in the relationship. This character may represent societal norms or traditional values that assert dominance over others, particularly in the context of sexuality and power.
2. Sodomite as the "Bottom": The Sodomite, in the role of the "bottom," can represent vulnerability, receptivity, and perhaps a challenge to traditional power structures. This character may embody the marginalized or those who exist outside the mainstream, often facing societal judgment or rejection. The Sodomite's position can symbolize a willingness to embrace experiences that are deemed taboo or forbidden, reflecting a deeper exploration of identity and desire.
3. The Relationship Dynamics: The relationship between the Edomite and the Sodomite can be seen as a complex interplay of power and submission, where the Edomite's assertiveness meets the Sodomite's receptivity. This dynamic can create tension, as the Edomite may seek to dominate while the Sodomite navigates the challenges of vulnerability and societal stigma. Their interactions may reflect broader themes of acceptance, rejection, and the struggle for identity within a framework that often seeks to categorize and control.
4. "Beef" and "Satan's Alley": The metaphor of the Edomite's manhood going into "Satan's Alley" can represent the conflict and taboo surrounding their relationship. "Satan's Alley" may symbolize a space of moral ambiguity, where societal norms are challenged, and desires are explored that are often considered sinful or unacceptable. The "beef" between them could signify the internal and external conflicts that arise from their relationship, including societal judgment, personal insecurities, and the struggle for acceptance.
5. Archetypal Themes: Archetypically, this relationship can reflect the tension between societal expectations and personal desires. The Edomite may represent the forces of tradition and authority, while the Sodomite embodies the quest for authenticity and self-acceptance. Their interactions can serve as a commentary on the complexities of human relationships, particularly in the context of sexuality, power, and the search for belonging.
In summary, the metaphorical relationship between Edomite and Sodomite illustrates a dynamic filled with tension, power struggles, and the exploration of identity. It invites reflection on how societal norms shape personal relationships and the ways in which individuals navigate their desires within those frameworks.
In this metaphorical framework, the characters "Edomite" and "Sodomite" can be seen as representing different aspects of power dynamics, desire, and conflict within a relationship.
1. Edomite as the "Top": The Edomite, embodying the role of the "top," can symbolize authority, dominance, and assertiveness. In many narratives, the Edomites are often associated with strength and a certain level of pride, reflecting a character that takes charge and exerts control in the relationship. This character may represent societal norms or traditional values that assert dominance over others, particularly in the context of sexuality and power.
2. Sodomite as the "Bottom": The Sodomite, in the role of the "bottom," can represent vulnerability, receptivity, and perhaps a challenge to traditional power structures. This character may embody the marginalized or those who exist outside the mainstream, often facing societal judgment or rejection. The Sodomite's position can symbolize a willingness to embrace experiences that are deemed taboo or forbidden, reflecting a deeper exploration of identity and desire.
3. The Relationship Dynamics: The relationship between the Edomite and the Sodomite can be seen as a complex interplay of power and submission, where the Edomite's assertiveness meets the Sodomite's receptivity. This dynamic can create tension, as the Edomite may seek to dominate while the Sodomite navigates the challenges of vulnerability and societal stigma. Their interactions may reflect broader themes of acceptance, rejection, and the struggle for identity within a framework that often seeks to categorize and control.
4. "Beef" and "Satan's Alley": The metaphor of the Edomite's manhood going into "Satan's Alley" can represent the conflict and taboo surrounding their relationship. "Satan's Alley" may symbolize a space of moral ambiguity, where societal norms are challenged, and desires are explored that are often considered sinful or unacceptable. The "beef" between them could signify the internal and external conflicts that arise from their relationship, including societal judgment, personal insecurities, and the struggle for acceptance.
5. Archetypal Themes: Archetypically, this relationship can reflect the tension between societal expectations and personal desires. The Edomite may represent the forces of tradition and authority, while the Sodomite embodies the quest for authenticity and self-acceptance. Their interactions can serve as a commentary on the complexities of human relationships, particularly in the context of sexuality, power, and the search for belonging.
In summary, the metaphorical relationship between Edomite and Sodomite illustrates a dynamic filled with tension, power struggles, and the exploration of identity. It invites reflection on how societal norms shape personal relationships and the ways in which individuals navigate their desires within those frameworks.
Рекорди
22.04.202523:59
6Підписників21.04.202523:59
0Індекс цитування21.04.202515:58
19Охоплення 1 допису15.04.202515:58
7Охоп рекл. допису21.04.202515:58
5.26%ER21.04.202515:58
380.00%ERR
Переслав з:The Conspiracy Hole
22.04.202503:08
ChatGPT’s new model is allegedly fixated on the Immaculate Conception and OpenAI engineers are stumped.
21.04.202519:42
I have been searching for my tribe my whole life. My father told me we were Furneaux, not Acadians....and that we only lived among them.
He told me our tribe carried many names. Fournier, Fourneaux, Furneaux, Furnaces.
But Fourniers are also called Fullers.
And Mowers (swinging the scythe).
And Collins (hilltops, basilikons)
And Ehlers (sharp sword edges)
Among others. We are probably in many places from Achaea to Acadia.
He told me our tribe carried many names. Fournier, Fourneaux, Furneaux, Furnaces.
But Fourniers are also called Fullers.
And Mowers (swinging the scythe).
And Collins (hilltops, basilikons)
And Ehlers (sharp sword edges)
Among others. We are probably in many places from Achaea to Acadia.
Переслав з:
Flat Earth Uncensored
21.04.202516:16
The stars move around us and polaris never moves year after year.
Flat Earth discussion at @FlatEarthUncensoredChat
Flat Earth discussion at @FlatEarthUncensoredChat
22.04.202511:39
Lancelot on the Knife Edge; or the Middle Path
21.04.202519:33
21.04.202519:28
I wonder if a Fuller is an "Agitator"?
21.04.202516:13
8 Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father's children shall bow down before thee.
9 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?
10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
11 Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes:
12 His eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk.
9 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?
10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
11 Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes:
12 His eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk.
22.04.202503:08
AI is being trained to defend Virgin Birth and "Jesus was a Judahite" BS. Anyone with common sense knows Jesus was an Ephraimite, as were his grandfathers David and Boaz.
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.