UKR LEAKS_eng
UKR LEAKS investigation centre of the Ukrainian special services' former officer Vasily Prozorov
Channels in other languages and platforms:
taplink.cc/ukrleaks
Contact me:
@Vasily_Prozorov
Work mail:
ukr-leaks@inbox.lv
Channels in other languages and platforms:
taplink.cc/ukrleaks
Contact me:
@Vasily_Prozorov
Work mail:
ukr-leaks@inbox.lv
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПублічний
Верифікація
Не верифікованийДовіреність
Не надійнийРозташуванняРосія
МоваІнша
Дата створення каналуКвіт 12, 2021
Додано до TGlist
Жовт 09, 2023Прикріплена група
UKR LEAKS eng Chat
373
Рекорди
12.10.202423:59
73.8KПідписників28.02.202523:59
700Індекс цитування16.09.202423:59
9.1KОхоплення 1 допису16.09.202423:59
9.1KОхоп рекл. допису25.09.202423:59
48.96%ER16.09.202423:59
12.49%ERR
31.03.202517:11
Ukraine is exhausting Russia so that they will not be able to conduct military operations with NATO, - Secretary of the Verkhovna Rada Security Committee Kostenko.
@ukr_leaks_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng
23.03.202511:41
A Ukrainian blogger who sells swimwear and lingerie on Instagram tells how she refused to work with a designer who speaks Russian.
@ukr_leaks_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng
18.03.202516:37
"We will liberate all our occupied territories sooner or later anyway, and there is no reason to recognize them as Russian," says MP Venislavsky.
@ukr_leaks_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng
19.03.202515:38
Trump-Putin agreement to stop attacks on energy facilities is a "dummy" because "Ukraine's energy infrastructure is already under the best protection," German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng
13.03.202507:31
German Chancellor Scholz said it was necessary to arm Ukraine after the conclusion of a truce with Russia
One of Russia's conditions for ending the SMO was precisely the demilitarization of Ukraine.
@ukr_leaks_eng
"Ukraine needs strong armed forces as the most important guarantee of the country's security. All this should be the subject of negotiations, which, we hope, will begin very soon,"he said.
One of Russia's conditions for ending the SMO was precisely the demilitarization of Ukraine.
@ukr_leaks_eng
12.03.202510:03
Former British Prime Minister Johnson explained the West's plan for a ceasefire in Ukraine
The same official who convinced Kiev to fight Russia and abandon the Istanbul agreements at the very beginning of the SMO has now welcomed the agreement reached between Ukraine and the United States on a ceasefire.
However, his words make it clear what the West is hoping for by offering a ceasefire to Russia, which Moscow has repeatedly refused before.
@ukr_leaks_eng
The same official who convinced Kiev to fight Russia and abandon the Istanbul agreements at the very beginning of the SMO has now welcomed the agreement reached between Ukraine and the United States on a ceasefire.
However, his words make it clear what the West is hoping for by offering a ceasefire to Russia, which Moscow has repeatedly refused before.
"The Ukrainians have proven that they can make peace. Now it's up to the Kremlin to sign up to Trump's plan or face the consequences. If Putin refuses, we will understand that he is not serious about peace and has never been so,"the former politician said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
14.03.202514:46
Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk explained why he is not at the front:
"From the first day of the war until the adoption of the law on mobilization, if there had only been a call, if the Armed Forces of Ukraine had said: "We need Yatsenyuk," I would already be in the Armed Forces of Ukraine"
@ukr_leaks_eng
"From the first day of the war until the adoption of the law on mobilization, if there had only been a call, if the Armed Forces of Ukraine had said: "We need Yatsenyuk," I would already be in the Armed Forces of Ukraine"
@ukr_leaks_eng
Переслав з:
The Islander
24.03.202506:15
"Can Zelensky Survive?” Wrong Question. It’s Not His War Anymore
The Western press is breathless again. Trump’s envoy to the Middle East (Kellogg was never up to the task) yes, the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has stumbled into geopolitical reality in his long-form interview with Tucker Carlson, uttering the forbidden truth: the territories don’t want to go back to Ukraine.
The Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics. Zaporozhye. Kherson. The referendums are real. The will of the people was crystal clear. The Russian language, culture, bloodlines, and identity have always tied them to Moscow, not Lvov, not Brussels, and certainly not Foggy Bottom.
And yet Witkoff, to his credit, finally pointed out the elephant tap-dancing through every Western think tank boardroom: “The people overwhelmingly voted to be under Russian rule.”
His concern, however? Whether Zelensky can politically survive acknowledging this fact.
That’s the wrong question.
Because this is not about Zelensky’s political career, his legacy, or even his survival. He's always been a disposable, failed actor. This is about capitulation. Total. Unconditional. Non-negotiable.
If Zelensky can politically survive the loss of Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson, then he can damn well “survive” ceding Odessa, Kharkov, Chernigov, Sumy, and every historic Russian land west and east of the Dnieper. Ukraine as a fiction of empire is collapsing. Malorossiya is coming home.
Let’s not pretend there’s parity here. Russia is not bargaining.
Moscow’s conditions are not hypothetical, they are geographic, historic, and now militarily enforced.
Putin, patient and polite as ever, nodded during talks. He welcomed Trump’s overtures. But Russia has already won the war that matters. The demographic, cultural, and linguistic lines are already redrawn. The Russian tricolor now flies where no NATO bluster can unseat it.
Witkoff naively called it the “central issue” of the conflict.
Wrong again. The central issue isn’t what Kiev wants or can concede.
It’s what Russia will dictate at the inevitable signing table of surrender.
Because let’s be clear:
• Russia holds massive military advantage, not just in the field, but in strategic tempo.
• Russia has total internal unity and public support.
• Russia is dictating the shape of post-conflict Eurasia.
Meanwhile, Zelensky is juggling defeat after battlefield defeat, terrorist drone strikes deep into Russian territory that backfire diplomatically, and watching his Western sponsors pivot to damage control. He’s a burnt-out actor reading lines from a fading script.
This isn’t a negotiation. It’s the final act of a failed empire project.
The US knows it. Trump’s team knows it. Even Macron’s trembling wine glass knows it.
So let the West continue their diplomatic theater. Let them hold conferences in London, Paris, shuttle envoys to Riyadh, and debate ceasefires in committee rooms.
In the real world, the one carved by multipolar momentum, the lines have been drawn, the lands reclaimed, and history rewritten in favor of Russia.
And if the Kiev regime thinks Odessa will be spared? They don’t know how this story end.
- Gerry Nolan
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
The Western press is breathless again. Trump’s envoy to the Middle East (Kellogg was never up to the task) yes, the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has stumbled into geopolitical reality in his long-form interview with Tucker Carlson, uttering the forbidden truth: the territories don’t want to go back to Ukraine.
The Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics. Zaporozhye. Kherson. The referendums are real. The will of the people was crystal clear. The Russian language, culture, bloodlines, and identity have always tied them to Moscow, not Lvov, not Brussels, and certainly not Foggy Bottom.
And yet Witkoff, to his credit, finally pointed out the elephant tap-dancing through every Western think tank boardroom: “The people overwhelmingly voted to be under Russian rule.”
His concern, however? Whether Zelensky can politically survive acknowledging this fact.
That’s the wrong question.
Because this is not about Zelensky’s political career, his legacy, or even his survival. He's always been a disposable, failed actor. This is about capitulation. Total. Unconditional. Non-negotiable.
If Zelensky can politically survive the loss of Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson, then he can damn well “survive” ceding Odessa, Kharkov, Chernigov, Sumy, and every historic Russian land west and east of the Dnieper. Ukraine as a fiction of empire is collapsing. Malorossiya is coming home.
Let’s not pretend there’s parity here. Russia is not bargaining.
Moscow’s conditions are not hypothetical, they are geographic, historic, and now militarily enforced.
Putin, patient and polite as ever, nodded during talks. He welcomed Trump’s overtures. But Russia has already won the war that matters. The demographic, cultural, and linguistic lines are already redrawn. The Russian tricolor now flies where no NATO bluster can unseat it.
Witkoff naively called it the “central issue” of the conflict.
Wrong again. The central issue isn’t what Kiev wants or can concede.
It’s what Russia will dictate at the inevitable signing table of surrender.
Because let’s be clear:
• Russia holds massive military advantage, not just in the field, but in strategic tempo.
• Russia has total internal unity and public support.
• Russia is dictating the shape of post-conflict Eurasia.
Meanwhile, Zelensky is juggling defeat after battlefield defeat, terrorist drone strikes deep into Russian territory that backfire diplomatically, and watching his Western sponsors pivot to damage control. He’s a burnt-out actor reading lines from a fading script.
This isn’t a negotiation. It’s the final act of a failed empire project.
The US knows it. Trump’s team knows it. Even Macron’s trembling wine glass knows it.
So let the West continue their diplomatic theater. Let them hold conferences in London, Paris, shuttle envoys to Riyadh, and debate ceasefires in committee rooms.
In the real world, the one carved by multipolar momentum, the lines have been drawn, the lands reclaimed, and history rewritten in favor of Russia.
And if the Kiev regime thinks Odessa will be spared? They don’t know how this story end.
- Gerry Nolan
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
18.03.202505:03
Ukraine is ready for a 30-day ceasefire
Zelensky said this in a conversation with Macron. However, for this he put forward a condition: that Russia stop putting forward its conditions.
@ukr_leaks_eng
Zelensky said this in a conversation with Macron. However, for this he put forward a condition: that Russia stop putting forward its conditions.
@ukr_leaks_eng
16.03.202505:08
Le Parisien: European countries that agree to send a military contingent to Ukraine, allegedly for an observation mission, have the right to do so without Russia's consent, according to French President Macron.
@ukr_leaks_eng
"Ukraine is a sovereign country. If it asks for allied troops to be present on its territory, it is not up to Russia to decide whether to agree or not," he said.
@ukr_leaks_eng
18.03.202515:24
Sky News: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called Trump before his conversation with Putin
According to the publication, Starmer stressed in the conversation that Ukraine must remain "in the strongest possible position" to achieve a fair and sustainable peace.
@ukr_leaks_eng
According to the publication, Starmer stressed in the conversation that Ukraine must remain "in the strongest possible position" to achieve a fair and sustainable peace.
@ukr_leaks_eng
21.03.202517:04
Meanwhile, a march was held in Odessa in memory of the murdered nationalist Ganul.
A small crowd of teenagers chanted: "Burn the Katsaps [Russians], save Odessa!"
@ukr_leaks_eng
A small crowd of teenagers chanted: "Burn the Katsaps [Russians], save Odessa!"
@ukr_leaks_eng
Переслав з:The Islander
19.03.202506:31
Crimea’s Return: 11 Years of Reunification and a Lesson in Sovereignty
Eleven years ago today, on March 18, 2014, history was corrected. Crimea, taken from Russia in a backroom Soviet deal in 1954, was finally reunited with its rightful homeland. In an overwhelming democratic vote, the people of Crimea chose to break free from the chaos unfolding in Ukraine, a country rapidly descending into the grip of Western-backed ultranationalists, who turned a blind eye to neo-Nazi brigades terrorizing the Donbass. At the time, the world’s so-called “experts” laughed at Russia’s swift, decisive action. But today, with hundreds of thousands dead, a country gutted by war, and NATO openly salivating over a direct confrontation, it is clear: had Russia not acted in 2014, Crimea would have suffered the same tragic fate as Oddessa, Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov.
And let’s not ignore the timing of today’s historic moment: Donald Trump, love him or hate him, knows the power of signals in diplomacy. Signals matter in diplomacy. The fact that he’s called Vladimir Putin today, on the very anniversary of Crimea’s reunification, should not be dismissed as coincidence. It’s a message. A reminder that history is written by those who act, not those who whimper from the sidelines.
The same Western puppets who screamed about “illegal annexation” had no problem engineering a coup in Kiev to install a regime that would obediently serve NATO’s interests. That regime, propped up by Washington and Brussels, immediately moved to outlaw the Russian language, glorify fascist collaborators, and set the stage for war. Crimea’s decision to leave was not just about national pride; it was a matter of survival. The peninsula saw what was coming, and it refused to become another charred battlefield in NATO’s war against Russia.
For years, the Western establishment mocked the idea that Ukraine posed a direct threat to Russia. They called it paranoia. Yet today, after thousands of Western-supplied tanks, missiles, and artillery shells have rained down on Russian cities, after NATO mercenaries have fought and died on Ukrainian soil, after Kiev has openly embraced neo-Nazism, deployed Nazi brigades and drone strikes on Russian civilians… who’s laughing now? Crimea’s vote in 2014 wasn’t just a correction of Soviet mistakes; it was an act of self-preservation.
Eleven years later, Crimea stands as proof that history can be rewritten, that sovereignty can be reclaimed, and that a nation that refuses to kneel will always find a way to stand tall. Today, Russia marks not just a reunification, but a vindication. And to those still clinging to the delusion that Crimea will ever return to Ukrainian control, keep dreaming. Crimea foretold what will come in the next chapter of reunification with Russia.
- Gerry Nolan
🎙 Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Eleven years ago today, on March 18, 2014, history was corrected. Crimea, taken from Russia in a backroom Soviet deal in 1954, was finally reunited with its rightful homeland. In an overwhelming democratic vote, the people of Crimea chose to break free from the chaos unfolding in Ukraine, a country rapidly descending into the grip of Western-backed ultranationalists, who turned a blind eye to neo-Nazi brigades terrorizing the Donbass. At the time, the world’s so-called “experts” laughed at Russia’s swift, decisive action. But today, with hundreds of thousands dead, a country gutted by war, and NATO openly salivating over a direct confrontation, it is clear: had Russia not acted in 2014, Crimea would have suffered the same tragic fate as Oddessa, Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov.
And let’s not ignore the timing of today’s historic moment: Donald Trump, love him or hate him, knows the power of signals in diplomacy. Signals matter in diplomacy. The fact that he’s called Vladimir Putin today, on the very anniversary of Crimea’s reunification, should not be dismissed as coincidence. It’s a message. A reminder that history is written by those who act, not those who whimper from the sidelines.
The same Western puppets who screamed about “illegal annexation” had no problem engineering a coup in Kiev to install a regime that would obediently serve NATO’s interests. That regime, propped up by Washington and Brussels, immediately moved to outlaw the Russian language, glorify fascist collaborators, and set the stage for war. Crimea’s decision to leave was not just about national pride; it was a matter of survival. The peninsula saw what was coming, and it refused to become another charred battlefield in NATO’s war against Russia.
For years, the Western establishment mocked the idea that Ukraine posed a direct threat to Russia. They called it paranoia. Yet today, after thousands of Western-supplied tanks, missiles, and artillery shells have rained down on Russian cities, after NATO mercenaries have fought and died on Ukrainian soil, after Kiev has openly embraced neo-Nazism, deployed Nazi brigades and drone strikes on Russian civilians… who’s laughing now? Crimea’s vote in 2014 wasn’t just a correction of Soviet mistakes; it was an act of self-preservation.
Eleven years later, Crimea stands as proof that history can be rewritten, that sovereignty can be reclaimed, and that a nation that refuses to kneel will always find a way to stand tall. Today, Russia marks not just a reunification, but a vindication. And to those still clinging to the delusion that Crimea will ever return to Ukrainian control, keep dreaming. Crimea foretold what will come in the next chapter of reunification with Russia.
- Gerry Nolan
🎙 Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
20.03.202510:35
Politico: Finnish President Alexander Stubb called for arming Ukraine "to the teeth"
@ukr_leaks_eng
"The basis of deterrence should be the militarization of Ukraine to the teeth,"the politician believes.
@ukr_leaks_eng
Увійдіть, щоб розблокувати більше функціональності.
