𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀ℕ𝕊 ♥︎
︎☀︎︎ꕥ 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 & 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝 ꕥ☀︎︎
♥︎ ʙᴇ ʀᴏᴏᴛᴇᴅ ɪɴ 𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 ᴡʜɪʟᴇ sᴇᴇᴋɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʀᴜᴛʜ －𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥, 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 ➤ 𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀ℕ𝕊
𝔣𝔢𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔫𝔢 𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔰 | 𝔭𝔯𝔬 𝔪𝔞𝔰𝔠𝔲𝔩𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔱𝔶 | 𝔰𝔞𝔠𝔯𝔢𝔡 𝔲𝔫𝔦𝔬𝔫
♥︎ ʙᴇ ʀᴏᴏᴛᴇᴅ ɪɴ 𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 ᴡʜɪʟᴇ sᴇᴇᴋɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʀᴜᴛʜ －𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥, 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘬 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 ➤ 𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀ℕ𝕊
𝔣𝔢𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔫𝔢 𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔰 | 𝔭𝔯𝔬 𝔪𝔞𝔰𝔠𝔲𝔩𝔦𝔫𝔦𝔱𝔶 | 𝔰𝔞𝔠𝔯𝔢𝔡 𝔲𝔫𝔦𝔬𝔫
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПубличный
Верификация
Не верифицированныйДоверенность
Не провернныйРасположение
ЯзыкДругой
Дата создания каналаЛют 28, 2021
Добавлено на TGlist
Трав 22, 2024Прикрепленная группа
𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀ℕ𝕊 ♥︎ 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭
31
Рекорды
15.04.202523:59
389Подписчиков17.05.202423:59
0Индекс цитирования31.03.202523:59
1.2KОхват одного поста31.10.202423:59
58Охват рекламного поста12.04.202503:50
21.43%ER31.03.202523:59
323.20%ERR
16.04.202504:01
26.03.202521:13
19.04.202510:47
17.04.202513:50
28.03.202513:50
post.reposted:
Historia Occulta
12.04.202520:48
Hildegard Didn’t Imagine Her Visions—She Recorded Them
Hildegard von Bingen never claimed authorship of her visions. She called herself a “feather on the breath of God,” not in humility, but accuracy. What she saw came in full light—clear, constant, and unasked for. From childhood, they arrived with force. By middle age, she could no longer remain silent.
The Scivias, her first major work, wasn’t poetry or theology in the usual sense. It was a transmission. Twenty-six visions, vast in scope, depicting not just heaven and earth but the very structure of reality—cosmic, medicinal, elemental. And alongside them: music, language, remedies. Not fragments of genius, but parts of a whole.
Later scholars tried to fit her into categories: mystic, composer, herbalist, proto-feminist. But those are shadows compared to what she actually was—someone attuned to patterns most people couldn’t perceive, and disciplined enough to write them down with clarity.
Follow @historiaocculta
Hildegard von Bingen never claimed authorship of her visions. She called herself a “feather on the breath of God,” not in humility, but accuracy. What she saw came in full light—clear, constant, and unasked for. From childhood, they arrived with force. By middle age, she could no longer remain silent.
The Scivias, her first major work, wasn’t poetry or theology in the usual sense. It was a transmission. Twenty-six visions, vast in scope, depicting not just heaven and earth but the very structure of reality—cosmic, medicinal, elemental. And alongside them: music, language, remedies. Not fragments of genius, but parts of a whole.
Later scholars tried to fit her into categories: mystic, composer, herbalist, proto-feminist. But those are shadows compared to what she actually was—someone attuned to patterns most people couldn’t perceive, and disciplined enough to write them down with clarity.
Follow @historiaocculta
09.04.202512:31
01.04.202512:23
16.04.202514:47
post.reposted:
𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀ℕ𝕊 ♥︎
23.03.202500:24
“4:49 the heartbeat of divinity”
✨🤍✨
https://youtu.be/vCXmHzESaQA
✨🤍✨
https://youtu.be/vCXmHzESaQA
04.04.202512:02
post.reposted:Historia Occulta
03.04.202513:39
When Sound Becomes Structure
Cymatics is not a theory—it’s what happens when sound is made visible. Dust, sand, water, or powder placed on a vibrating plate begins to form patterns, not randomly, but with order. Each frequency produces a distinct shape. As the pitch increases, the forms become more complex. What begins as simple geometry evolves into something that feels architectural—almost alive.
The study isn’t new. The German physicist Ernst Chladni first observed these effects in the 18th century, drawing tones across metal plates with a violin bow. In the 1960s, Hans Jenny took it further—recording how matter responded not just to audible sound, but to pulses and harmonics. What he found wasn’t noise—it was language. Structured, repeatable, patterned with precision.
Cymatics doesn’t just show that sound has form. It shows that sound forms. That vibration doesn’t just move through matter—it organizes it. Which raises a quieter question, still unanswered: how much of the world we see has been shaped by what we do not hear?
Follow @historiaocculta
Cymatics is not a theory—it’s what happens when sound is made visible. Dust, sand, water, or powder placed on a vibrating plate begins to form patterns, not randomly, but with order. Each frequency produces a distinct shape. As the pitch increases, the forms become more complex. What begins as simple geometry evolves into something that feels architectural—almost alive.
The study isn’t new. The German physicist Ernst Chladni first observed these effects in the 18th century, drawing tones across metal plates with a violin bow. In the 1960s, Hans Jenny took it further—recording how matter responded not just to audible sound, but to pulses and harmonics. What he found wasn’t noise—it was language. Structured, repeatable, patterned with precision.
Cymatics doesn’t just show that sound has form. It shows that sound forms. That vibration doesn’t just move through matter—it organizes it. Which raises a quieter question, still unanswered: how much of the world we see has been shaped by what we do not hear?
Follow @historiaocculta
05.04.202519:20
18.04.202513:22
Войдите, чтобы разблокировать больше функциональности.
