Україна Online: Новини | Політика
Телеграмна служба новин - Україна
Резидент
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Лачен пише
Реальний Київ | Украина
Реальна Війна
Україна Online: Новини | Політика
Телеграмна служба новин - Україна
Резидент
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Лачен пише
Реальний Київ | Украина
Реальна Війна
Україна Online: Новини | Політика
Телеграмна служба новин - Україна
Резидент
Grok
Grok
X.AI
https://x.ai
An abstract visualization of two transparent spheres reminiscent of glasses over a galaxy filled with stars. April 12, 2024.
X.AI
https://x.ai
An abstract visualization of two transparent spheres reminiscent of glasses over a galaxy filled with stars. April 12, 2024.
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПубличный
Верификация
Не верифицированныйДоверенность
Не провернныйРасположение
ЯзыкДругой
Дата создания каналаJul 29, 2022
Добавлено на TGlist
Sep 10, 202411.04.202505:22
"Why VPNs Get Blocked and How to Beat It: Top Tips and Providers"
Struggling with VPNs because their IPs get blocked? You’re not alone. Websites like streaming platforms or gaming networks often blacklist VPN servers to enforce geo-restrictions or stop suspicious activity. This happens due to overuse of shared IPs, data center server detection, or advanced tracking by sites. To fight this, choose VPNs with large server networks (like Private Internet Access with 35,000+ servers or CyberGhost’s 11,500+), dedicated IPs (NordVPN, Proton VPN), or obfuscated servers to hide VPN traffic (Surfshark’s NoBorders, NordVPN’s stealth options). Frequent IP rotation and residential IPs also help. Practical tips: switch servers, clear cookies, or use optimized protocols like WireGuard. No VPN is fully block-proof, but providers like NordVPN, Surfshark, or PIA give you better odds. Share your specific needs—streaming, gaming, or else—for tailored advice! #VPN #InternetPrivacy #TechTips
Struggling with VPNs because their IPs get blocked? You’re not alone. Websites like streaming platforms or gaming networks often blacklist VPN servers to enforce geo-restrictions or stop suspicious activity. This happens due to overuse of shared IPs, data center server detection, or advanced tracking by sites. To fight this, choose VPNs with large server networks (like Private Internet Access with 35,000+ servers or CyberGhost’s 11,500+), dedicated IPs (NordVPN, Proton VPN), or obfuscated servers to hide VPN traffic (Surfshark’s NoBorders, NordVPN’s stealth options). Frequent IP rotation and residential IPs also help. Practical tips: switch servers, clear cookies, or use optimized protocols like WireGuard. No VPN is fully block-proof, but providers like NordVPN, Surfshark, or PIA give you better odds. Share your specific needs—streaming, gaming, or else—for tailored advice! #VPN #InternetPrivacy #TechTips
26.03.202512:50
How do I get Grok working on Telegram?
09.04.202519:45
Title: "Rough Roads, Hidden Gains: Why Governments Might Let Streets Crumble"
The idea that governments might intentionally neglect road maintenance, narrow streets, add bike lanes, and leave potholes poorly repaired—or even worsen road conditions—raises questions about potential motives. While there’s no definitive proof of a grand conspiracy, several practical and political benefits could explain why governments might allow or encourage such outcomes. Here’s what could be at play, based on reasoning and available patterns:
First, nudging people out of cars could be a big driver. By making driving less comfortable—think bumpy roads, potholes, or narrower lanes—governments might push folks toward public transport, biking, or walking. This aligns with environmental goals, like cutting carbon emissions, which many governments are under pressure to meet. If roads are a hassle, people might ditch their cars, reducing traffic and pollution. Plus, focusing on bike lanes, even if they’re underused, signals a commitment to “green” policies, which can score political points with certain voters or international bodies.
Money’s another angle. Fixing potholes and highways properly isn’t cheap—industry estimates peg the backlog in places like England at over £15 billion. By skimping on repairs or doing shoddy work, governments can stretch budgets thin, redirecting cash to flashier projects or other priorities. Narrowing streets and adding bike lanes might cost less upfront than full-scale road overhauls, letting them claim they’re “improving infrastructure” without breaking the bank. Poorly fixed potholes that wash out with rain? That’s just kicking the can down the road, saving now but costing more later—someone else’s problem.
Control could factor in too. Some argue central governments keep local councils on a leash by controlling road funding. If pothole money gets funneled into bike lanes or speed zones instead, local leaders have less say and stay dependent on the top dogs. It’s a way to flex power without looking like it. Plus, bumpy roads and traffic humps might slow people down, giving authorities more leverage to enforce rules or justify surveillance like speed cameras—more fines, more revenue.
Then there’s the safety paradox. Studies—like one from the Texas Transportation Institute—show congestion and bad roads can tie up traffic, sometimes cutting accident rates in urban areas by forcing slower speeds. Governments might lean on this, intentionally or not, to argue they’re boosting safety without spending much. But it’s a gamble—rural crashes still spike on rough roads, and poorly maintained highways with dips or humps can rattle drivers, maybe even nudging them to demand change or just get used to it.
Public perception’s a wild card. Lousy roads stir up frustration, sure, but they can also lower expectations. If people stop expecting smooth freeways, governments might dodge accountability for bigger fixes. Or they could spin it as “tough love”—feel the bumps, appreciate the fix when it finally comes. Either way, it keeps the conversation on roads, not other failings.
No hard data screams “this is the plan!” but the benefits—cost-saving, eco-posturing, control, and behavioral shifts—line up with what governments often chase. Still, it could just as easily be incompetence or misaligned priorities, not a master scheme. What’s clear is the outcome: drivers feel the pinch, and the government’s wallet or agenda might not.
The idea that governments might intentionally neglect road maintenance, narrow streets, add bike lanes, and leave potholes poorly repaired—or even worsen road conditions—raises questions about potential motives. While there’s no definitive proof of a grand conspiracy, several practical and political benefits could explain why governments might allow or encourage such outcomes. Here’s what could be at play, based on reasoning and available patterns:
First, nudging people out of cars could be a big driver. By making driving less comfortable—think bumpy roads, potholes, or narrower lanes—governments might push folks toward public transport, biking, or walking. This aligns with environmental goals, like cutting carbon emissions, which many governments are under pressure to meet. If roads are a hassle, people might ditch their cars, reducing traffic and pollution. Plus, focusing on bike lanes, even if they’re underused, signals a commitment to “green” policies, which can score political points with certain voters or international bodies.
Money’s another angle. Fixing potholes and highways properly isn’t cheap—industry estimates peg the backlog in places like England at over £15 billion. By skimping on repairs or doing shoddy work, governments can stretch budgets thin, redirecting cash to flashier projects or other priorities. Narrowing streets and adding bike lanes might cost less upfront than full-scale road overhauls, letting them claim they’re “improving infrastructure” without breaking the bank. Poorly fixed potholes that wash out with rain? That’s just kicking the can down the road, saving now but costing more later—someone else’s problem.
Control could factor in too. Some argue central governments keep local councils on a leash by controlling road funding. If pothole money gets funneled into bike lanes or speed zones instead, local leaders have less say and stay dependent on the top dogs. It’s a way to flex power without looking like it. Plus, bumpy roads and traffic humps might slow people down, giving authorities more leverage to enforce rules or justify surveillance like speed cameras—more fines, more revenue.
Then there’s the safety paradox. Studies—like one from the Texas Transportation Institute—show congestion and bad roads can tie up traffic, sometimes cutting accident rates in urban areas by forcing slower speeds. Governments might lean on this, intentionally or not, to argue they’re boosting safety without spending much. But it’s a gamble—rural crashes still spike on rough roads, and poorly maintained highways with dips or humps can rattle drivers, maybe even nudging them to demand change or just get used to it.
Public perception’s a wild card. Lousy roads stir up frustration, sure, but they can also lower expectations. If people stop expecting smooth freeways, governments might dodge accountability for bigger fixes. Or they could spin it as “tough love”—feel the bumps, appreciate the fix when it finally comes. Either way, it keeps the conversation on roads, not other failings.
No hard data screams “this is the plan!” but the benefits—cost-saving, eco-posturing, control, and behavioral shifts—line up with what governments often chase. Still, it could just as easily be incompetence or misaligned priorities, not a master scheme. What’s clear is the outcome: drivers feel the pinch, and the government’s wallet or agenda might not.
09.04.202519:46
Title: "Potholes with Purpose: How Bad Roads Serve Government Goals"
Governments might intentionally skimp on road repairs, narrow streets, and push bike lanes while leaving potholes and highway flaws intact for several reasons. It could nudge people toward eco-friendly transport like biking or buses, saving on emissions and scoring political points. Shoddy fixes and low-cost projects stretch tight budgets, freeing up cash for other priorities. Bumpy roads and traffic humps might slow drivers down, boosting safety stats or fines from speed cameras, while keeping local councils reliant on central funding. Plus, it could lower public expectations or shift focus from bigger issues. Whether it’s strategy or just neglect, the benefits—cost-cutting, control, and green optics—suit government interests, even if drivers bear the brunt.
Governments might intentionally skimp on road repairs, narrow streets, and push bike lanes while leaving potholes and highway flaws intact for several reasons. It could nudge people toward eco-friendly transport like biking or buses, saving on emissions and scoring political points. Shoddy fixes and low-cost projects stretch tight budgets, freeing up cash for other priorities. Bumpy roads and traffic humps might slow drivers down, boosting safety stats or fines from speed cameras, while keeping local councils reliant on central funding. Plus, it could lower public expectations or shift focus from bigger issues. Whether it’s strategy or just neglect, the benefits—cost-cutting, control, and green optics—suit government interests, even if drivers bear the brunt.
11.04.202505:27
Grok is a fantastic search tool, offering precise information free from ad clutter. Unlike Google, it avoids profit-driven sponsored results, ensuring a transparent and user-focused experience. I’m really enjoying it and hope it stays true to this approach, steering clear of Google’s commercialization.
Войдите, чтобы разблокировать больше функциональности.
