Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Просмотреть

Николаевский Ванёк

Просмотреть

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Просмотреть

Труха⚡️Україна

Просмотреть

Николаевский Ванёк

Просмотреть

I Fucking Hate Science

Рейтинг TGlist

ТипПубличный

Верификация

Не верифицированный

Доверенность

Не провернный

Расположение

ЯзыкДругой

Дата создания каналаЛют 06, 2023

Добавлено на TGlist

Трав 23, 2024

Я владелец канала

История изменений

Прикрепленная группа

I Fucking Hate Science Chat

152

Статистика Телеграм-канала I Fucking Hate Science

Подробнее

Подписчиков

3 712

24 часа

2-0.1%Неделя

14-0.4%Месяц

39-1%

Индекс цитирования

0

Упоминаний0Репостов на каналах0Упоминаний на каналах0

Среднее охват одного поста

229

12 часов3910%24 часа2290%48 часов432

61.9%

Вовлеченность (ER)

12.66%

Репостов7Комментариев1Реакций22

Вовлеченность по охвату (ERR)

6.17%

24 часа0%Неделя

2.41%Месяц

3.62%

Охват одного рекламного поста

204

1 час8541.67%1 – 4 часа6833.33%4 - 24 часа13566.18%

Подробнее

Подключите нашего бота к каналу и узнайте пол аудитории этого канала.

Всего постов за 24 часа

4

Динамика

Последние публикации в группе "I Fucking Hate Science"

Все посты

post.reposted:

Charlie Kirk

20.04.202514:45

Incredible chart from The New York Times. The federal government gives 30 times as much research funding to universities as it did during the Cold War, adjusted for inflation. It gives almost three times as much as it did at the end of the Cold War.

Is America more innovative or better at research than it was 25 years ago? Just the opposite: Universities have fat endowments and thousands of highly-paid administrators, but their actual work is less impressive by the day.

Not only that, but campuses have embraced ideological poisons like DEI and critical race theory that are a death sentence for authentic science. And of course, every year brings another 4-5% hike in tuition.

The Trump Administration is right to demand immediate change. No more racial discrimination. No more Marxism masquerading as science. No more waste.

20.04.202510:29

🥚☦️Happy Easter ✝️🐇

20.04.202504:32

post.reposted:

Science Cringe

20.04.202501:23

"CONTROVERSY CONTINUES TO PLAGUE DEAD SEA SCROLLS" - Neil Altman, Roanoke Times, 30APR1995

>Albright was nearly blind, yet it was upon his authority many scholars accepted his dating as "pre-Christian."

>linen wrapping materials and woolen textiles found at the sites, actually date well into the Christian era, some as late as 600 A.D.

>Solomon Zeitlin of UNPENN - scrolls date from medieval times, anywhere from 300 A.D. to 1600 A.D.

>Norman Golb, UChicago - paleography, archeology and carbon-14 - compromised to fit theories the scrolls date from before time of Christ.

>Golb points out that none of the sciences used for dating the scrolls are valid compared with the internal evidence of the words on the scrolls themselves.

>Carbon dating of the Isaiah Scroll is as early as 335 B.C., according to tests done in 1991. Paleographic and archeological dating is as late as 100 B.C. But Zeitlin found spelling "on par with the spelling in many writings of the Middle Ages."

https://archive.ph/zhOGG
(Fake History)

post.reposted:

Science Cringe

19.04.202516:50

"Is Having a Loving Family an Unfair Advantage?" - Joe Gelonesi, ABC, 1MAY2015

>Plato famously wanted to abolish the family and put children into care of the state. Some still think the traditional family has a lot to answer for, but some plausible arguments remain in favour of it. Joe Gelonesi meets a philosopher with a rescue plan very much in tune with the times.

>So, what to do?

>According to Swift, from a purely instrumental position the answer is straightforward.

>‘One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.’

>It’s not the first time a philosopher has thought about such a drastic solution. Two thousand four hundred years ago another sage reasoned that the care of children should be undertaken by the state.

https://archive.ph/PiRxL

19.04.202510:25

post.reposted:

Femoids Unleashed

19.04.202505:15

Smartest female volcanologist.

post.reposted:

Science Cringe

18.04.202520:38

"A Retracted Stem Cell Study Reveals Science’s Shortcomings" -
PETER ALDHOUS, SciAm, 02JUL24

>The withdrawal after 22 years of a controversial stem cell paper highlights how perverse incentives can distort scientific progress

>In June a notice posted on the website of the journal Nature set a new scientific record. It withdrew what is now the most highly cited research paper ever to be retracted.

>The study, published in 2002 by Catherine Verfaillie, then at the University of Minnesota, and her colleagues, had been cited 4,482 times by its demise according to the Web of Science. The bone marrow cells it described were lauded as an alternative to embryonic stem cells, offering the same potential to develop into any type of tissue but without the need to destroy an early-stage human embryo. At that time the U.S. government was wrestling with the ethics of funding stem cell research, and politicians opposed to work on embryos championed Verfaillie’s findings.

https://archive.ph/WHj8n

post.reposted:

Science Cringe

18.04.202517:47

"This 'treasure' rewrote California history. It was an elaborate hoax." - Katie Dowd, SFGATE, 01MAR2021

>For centuries, historians had searched for Drake’s plate, the only evidence of Francisco El Draco's expedition to the California coast. The "English" privateer, fresh off raiding Spanish ships and towns along the Pacific coast, found safe harbor in the Point Reyes area in June 1579. He claimed the territory for Queen Elizabeth I. He named it New Albion.

>According to crew member accounts, El Draco left an inscribed brass plate in the area to stake his claim. But in the 350 years since, no one had seen it.

>“If the Drake plate is bogus, the hoax was perpetrated by someone who had not only studied the history of his voyages minutely but who also had knowledge of ship fittings of the 16th century,” Bolton told the Oakland Tribune.

>In 1933, five Clampers employed an Alameda ship worker to make the brass plate, and hand-carved the inscription.

https://archive.ph/OIEIM
(Fake History)

post.reposted:

Science Cringe

18.04.202517:27

"Donation of Constantine" - wiki

>The Donation of Constantine (Latin: Donatio Constantini) is a forged Roman imperial decree by which the 4th-century emperor Constantine the Great supposedly transferred authority over Rome and the western part of the Roman Empire to the Pope. Composed probably in the 8th century, it was used, especially in the 13th century, in support of claims of political authority by the papacy.

https://archive.ph/zoLhC
(Fake History)

post.reposted:

Disclose.tv

18.04.202514:47

JUST IN - White House updates COVID.gov to a website outlining how the pandemic originated from a Chinese lab leak.

https://COVID.Gov

@disclosetv

post.reposted:

Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel

17.04.202519:14

https://youtu.be/ojDlvfkW5wc

This is very well presented, by investigator and author, John Hamer (“The Falsification of History” and “The Falsification of Science”).

I’ve known since 2022 that nuclear fission weapons (“atom bombs”) allegedly used to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely faked. The methods used to destroy them were those used to obliterate Kobe, Yokohama and other mainland Japanese cities in WW2, namely, large numbers of incendiary devices. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki only, they also dropped chemical weapons, nitrogen mustards IIRC, to mimic the expected effects of bone marrow destroying nuclear radiation.

The evidence I evaluated to reach this conclusion was contained in a book by Dr Michael Palmer, “Hiroshima Revisited”. It’s available as a free pdf from Michael’s website (and you can buy a paperback version if you wish).

Much of the evidence presented here by John Hamer overlaps with that in Michael Palmer’s book. However, I’m going on only what John used in his talk, though he has done a more thorough job of dismantling the post-WW2 alleged atomic bomb tests. A coauthor was a former professional photographer, who’s looked at all of the few public photographs of these tests and declared all of them fairly crude fakes.

Michael by contrast focussed a large proportion of his attention onto the alleged radioactive fallout & other sources of radioactive contamination. I believe Michael’s training is in some branch of “medical physics”, making him well placed to identify the absurd & fatal (to the mendacious narrative) incongruities in the evidence.

There’s no room for doubt, in my opinion: the Americans didn’t have nuclear bombs in 1945 & all the post war atomic bomb tests were also faked.

I’ve argued previously in this channel that we are not privy to the reasons why they didn’t have “the bomb” in 1945 or into the 1950s. If these reasons were simply engineering complexities, it would be reasonable to expect that these hindrances were eventually overcome. If this is the case, what were those hurdles & when were they overcame? Someone must know this.

The alternative position is they didn’t exist in 1945 & they still don’t. Until the Ukraine event, I would have leaned towards the likelihood that the technical problems were surmounted and there are nuclear tipped ballistic missiles around the world. I now lean towards the position that they still don’t exist. Compelling evidence for that comes from the current & absurdly provocative confrontation between the Great Powers which is apparently steadily escalating. If nuclear Armageddon was a risk, neither Great Power would be willing to play “Russian roulette” with their own lives and property.

As it is, we’re meant to believe the world has lost its teams of diplomats and is willing to let events take their own course. I don’t believe that. I think even “a limited, tactical nuclear exchange in Ukraine” would precipitate the end of the modern world through a series of uncontrollable consequences in things like financial markets, business and consumer confidence collapse to say nothing about the expected further seizing of our freedoms by authoritarian governments.

Of course, as I have mentioned before, this is merely one plausible scenario that these cockroaches may be preparing to unleash.

Don’t be frightened, be furious, well-briefed and communicative.

Best wishes
Mike

Ps: there is apparently a substantial cash prize available to anyone who can prove the existence of nuclear fission weapons. It’s been in on the table for years but oddly not taken up. (I’m relying here on John Hamer’s remarks being verifiable).