The Irish Inquiry
post.reposted:
Ar Aghaidh
08.04.202509:18
VIEW POINT: Have you ever gone to the top of the Eiffel Tower, all 300 metres to the very top excluding the radio mast. The Eiffel Tower is the tallest structure in Paris and is equivalent to the height of an eighty one story building. In contrast the well known and much disliked Poolbeg chimneys on the approach to Dublin Port are only 207 metres in height. These statistics are important because a planning application has been submitted to An Bord Pleanala by developers RWE to construct between 39 and 50 wind turbines, each of which will be 310 meters tall and sited just 10km from the coast line between Dun Laoghaire and Greystones. The blades will be 207 metres in diameter. A European directive for wind turbines states that they should be sited at least 22 km of shore. These proposed wind turbines are part of a chain of wind turbines that will stretch from Dundalk to Wexford and will number an additional 100 turbines.
These turbines are part of a movement towards ‘green’ energy. The claim is that wind turbines are beneficial to the environment, community and the planet. Therefor to oppose them is to be anti environment. Let’s examine that evidence. These turbines will be very visible and oppressive. They will be easily seen from the shore and will dominate the skyline impacting on the quality of life for residents and on the tourist industry. For example they will be just 8•92 Km from Greystones harbour. Also noise carries over water. There are 11,000 tons of blade waste awaiting disposal in Ireland alone. Blades last for about twenty years before needing to be replaced. They are technically difficult to recycle and that’s why the waste is accumulating. Wind Europe describes itself as the ‘voice of the wind industry’ and offers landfill as a solution. So much for ‘green’. It is estimated that blade waste will create 200,000 tons of waste per annum that as of now is heading for landfill. This is just hypocrisy, a form of ‘green washing’ to satisfy optics and woke politics.
The reason why it is proposed to site the turbines so close to the coast is because they will be sited on sandbanks so in relatively shallow water. But in Arklow the siting of the turbines has produced scouring around the site that interferes with fish and bird life and also they have changed tidal patterns causing Brittas Beach to be eroded at the rate of seven metres a year. This just shows the heavy environmental price that must be paid for environmentally sustainable energy. Does anybody see the contradictions, the green hypocrisy. Furthermore wind turbines are detrimental to bird life. Individual figures offered out of context have limited academic value but that’s all we have got when we try to explore this little researched area. But it is estimated that 1•17 million birds are killed per annum by wind farms in the US. Clearly this should be worrying to anybody with a genuinely green conscience.
These are only some of the environmental concerns around wind turbines. There is a tendency to ‘talk up’ green energy giving the downside a free pass. It is unlikely if a single wind turbine ever covers for its carbon footprint from construction to decommissioning. It is reasonable to ask if conventional electricity is not just as green if everything is taken into account. If this is so then the price is too high in terms of visual intrusion along the Dublin and North Wicklow coast line.
The reality is that many of us including our government and fake opposition are enslaved to the pseudoscience of man made climate change and therefor we have signed up to the Paris Protocols on Climate which penalise us financially if we fail to meet targets set by others. There is no allowance for the factual evidence of the historical record that the planet goes through long cooling and warming cycles that are perfectly natural. The need to reach these targets have created an artificial market for ‘green’ energy that is not green. Residents of seasides where wind turbines are sited off shore will pay the price through visual intrusiveness. Stop this now.
These turbines are part of a movement towards ‘green’ energy. The claim is that wind turbines are beneficial to the environment, community and the planet. Therefor to oppose them is to be anti environment. Let’s examine that evidence. These turbines will be very visible and oppressive. They will be easily seen from the shore and will dominate the skyline impacting on the quality of life for residents and on the tourist industry. For example they will be just 8•92 Km from Greystones harbour. Also noise carries over water. There are 11,000 tons of blade waste awaiting disposal in Ireland alone. Blades last for about twenty years before needing to be replaced. They are technically difficult to recycle and that’s why the waste is accumulating. Wind Europe describes itself as the ‘voice of the wind industry’ and offers landfill as a solution. So much for ‘green’. It is estimated that blade waste will create 200,000 tons of waste per annum that as of now is heading for landfill. This is just hypocrisy, a form of ‘green washing’ to satisfy optics and woke politics.
The reason why it is proposed to site the turbines so close to the coast is because they will be sited on sandbanks so in relatively shallow water. But in Arklow the siting of the turbines has produced scouring around the site that interferes with fish and bird life and also they have changed tidal patterns causing Brittas Beach to be eroded at the rate of seven metres a year. This just shows the heavy environmental price that must be paid for environmentally sustainable energy. Does anybody see the contradictions, the green hypocrisy. Furthermore wind turbines are detrimental to bird life. Individual figures offered out of context have limited academic value but that’s all we have got when we try to explore this little researched area. But it is estimated that 1•17 million birds are killed per annum by wind farms in the US. Clearly this should be worrying to anybody with a genuinely green conscience.
These are only some of the environmental concerns around wind turbines. There is a tendency to ‘talk up’ green energy giving the downside a free pass. It is unlikely if a single wind turbine ever covers for its carbon footprint from construction to decommissioning. It is reasonable to ask if conventional electricity is not just as green if everything is taken into account. If this is so then the price is too high in terms of visual intrusion along the Dublin and North Wicklow coast line.
The reality is that many of us including our government and fake opposition are enslaved to the pseudoscience of man made climate change and therefor we have signed up to the Paris Protocols on Climate which penalise us financially if we fail to meet targets set by others. There is no allowance for the factual evidence of the historical record that the planet goes through long cooling and warming cycles that are perfectly natural. The need to reach these targets have created an artificial market for ‘green’ energy that is not green. Residents of seasides where wind turbines are sited off shore will pay the price through visual intrusiveness. Stop this now.
04.04.202517:09
Shady Secrecy at Mooney's Migrant Centre on Former Government Minister's Doorstep (FULL VIDEO)
WHY has this IPAS Centre very near Minister Roderic O'Gorman's home been kept a secret for so long?
WHY is its owner (with a very shady past) only applying to be a migrant centre now when it has been full for at least 18 months?
WHY are single foreign males visiting the Centre at night (some in high end cars?)
WHY was there such panic to cover the place up even more after we arrived?
WHY are the staff so defensive?
WHERE do the work men come from?
HOW come no residents in O'Gorman's housing estate knew this was a migrant centre? WHY didn't he tell them?
WHY is he so quiet on the resident WhatsApp group amid residents concerns?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y09Yo75-zos
WHY has this IPAS Centre very near Minister Roderic O'Gorman's home been kept a secret for so long?
WHY is its owner (with a very shady past) only applying to be a migrant centre now when it has been full for at least 18 months?
WHY are single foreign males visiting the Centre at night (some in high end cars?)
WHY was there such panic to cover the place up even more after we arrived?
WHY are the staff so defensive?
WHERE do the work men come from?
HOW come no residents in O'Gorman's housing estate knew this was a migrant centre? WHY didn't he tell them?
WHY is he so quiet on the resident WhatsApp group amid residents concerns?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y09Yo75-zos
01.04.202517:43
DO THE MATH 👇!! (I’ve done it for you)
In a refugee spousal couple with 4 children scenario (no bills, no accommodation costs, no medical costs, no food or transport costs, etc.), expendable income is:
€244 per week for a qualifying adult = €1,057 per month or €12,688 per year, plus
€168 per week for an adult dependent (spouse) = €728 per month or €8,736 per year, plus
€54 x 2 for 2 kids aged 12 and over = €108 per week, which is €468 per month or €5,616 per year, plus
€46 x 2 for 2 kids under 12 = €92 per week, which is €399 per month or €4,784 per year, plus
€140 per month child benefit for 4 children = €560 per month or €6,720 per year
TOTAL: €38,544 expendable income per year, not including additional payments like Christmas bonuses, budgetary one-offs, car repairs, etc.
People of Ireland WAKE UP!
While you break your back and miss your children growing up because you can’t afford to spend more than a few minutes to a couple of hours a day with them, people are arriving here and getting free food, accommodation, medical costs, all utilities paid, travel costs, and additional costs met (car repairs, etc.). If you are automatically deemed a refugee (or are an asylum seeker who then gets awarded refugee status), you get full social welfare, additional payments for child dependents, child benefit, and any other extra payments (bonuses, etc.). Depending on how many adults and children are in a family, such payments can add up to thousands a month in expendable income (not counting all the freebies outlined above). Do the math! Nearly €40,000 in the scenario given here (2 adults, 4 children). I chose this example because migrant families tend to have more children.
It’s also worth noting that while asylum seekers get less, they are allowed to work and still don’t contribute to bills, accommodation costs, medical costs, food, or transport costs, etc.
YOUR GOVERNMENT IS DOING YOU DIRTY.
In a refugee spousal couple with 4 children scenario (no bills, no accommodation costs, no medical costs, no food or transport costs, etc.), expendable income is:
€244 per week for a qualifying adult = €1,057 per month or €12,688 per year, plus
€168 per week for an adult dependent (spouse) = €728 per month or €8,736 per year, plus
€54 x 2 for 2 kids aged 12 and over = €108 per week, which is €468 per month or €5,616 per year, plus
€46 x 2 for 2 kids under 12 = €92 per week, which is €399 per month or €4,784 per year, plus
€140 per month child benefit for 4 children = €560 per month or €6,720 per year
TOTAL: €38,544 expendable income per year, not including additional payments like Christmas bonuses, budgetary one-offs, car repairs, etc.
People of Ireland WAKE UP!
While you break your back and miss your children growing up because you can’t afford to spend more than a few minutes to a couple of hours a day with them, people are arriving here and getting free food, accommodation, medical costs, all utilities paid, travel costs, and additional costs met (car repairs, etc.). If you are automatically deemed a refugee (or are an asylum seeker who then gets awarded refugee status), you get full social welfare, additional payments for child dependents, child benefit, and any other extra payments (bonuses, etc.). Depending on how many adults and children are in a family, such payments can add up to thousands a month in expendable income (not counting all the freebies outlined above). Do the math! Nearly €40,000 in the scenario given here (2 adults, 4 children). I chose this example because migrant families tend to have more children.
It’s also worth noting that while asylum seekers get less, they are allowed to work and still don’t contribute to bills, accommodation costs, medical costs, food, or transport costs, etc.
YOUR GOVERNMENT IS DOING YOU DIRTY.
26.03.202514:44
You can't add visiting a dead relative to the list of things you can do safely anymore. Some people might fear ghosts in such places, but what about unvetted migrant rapists? (The alleged rapist is a Somalian man; more than 99% of Somalis are Sunni Muslims who follow Sharia law.) Once again, let’s ask ourselves: WHO does it benefit to allow largely undocumented, illegal migrants into our country?
Men (the majority of whom) arrive with undeniably deep-rooted, malignant, misogynistic attitudes toward women and are being given open doors. Male attitudes toward children are sometimes no better.
In Somalia, rape is prevalent, and one-third of all victims are children. This is expected in a country where child marriage is a persistent problem.
We cannot ignore these FACTS, but @RuthCoppingerSP
and many others will, while claiming to care about gender-based violence—which is like trying to claim you’re against arson while welcoming pyromaniacs.
She and others will ignore (and in fact welcome) hundreds of men being put into small communities who are living in enforced celibacy by virtue of their circumstances. Does this mean they’re all potential rapists?
No.
What it does mean, however, is that we don’t know who has raped or will rape.
We just know that some have and some will again. Meanwhile, we have enough of our own rapists to contend with, no? The courts are showing us there IS an overrepresentation of non-Irish men coming before them, however.
And that puts all women and children (migrant and Irish) at risk (and puts many living in fear and unable to do everyday things without worry, which is damaging to the psyche and to society overall, moving us from a high-trust, low-risk era into a now low-trust, high-risk era).
It appears this man was bailed despite the seriousness of the attack.
Which should not surprise anyone. Why care about locking up rapists when you don’t care about them getting in here in the first instance?
Men (the majority of whom) arrive with undeniably deep-rooted, malignant, misogynistic attitudes toward women and are being given open doors. Male attitudes toward children are sometimes no better.
In Somalia, rape is prevalent, and one-third of all victims are children. This is expected in a country where child marriage is a persistent problem.
We cannot ignore these FACTS, but @RuthCoppingerSP
and many others will, while claiming to care about gender-based violence—which is like trying to claim you’re against arson while welcoming pyromaniacs.
She and others will ignore (and in fact welcome) hundreds of men being put into small communities who are living in enforced celibacy by virtue of their circumstances. Does this mean they’re all potential rapists?
No.
What it does mean, however, is that we don’t know who has raped or will rape.
We just know that some have and some will again. Meanwhile, we have enough of our own rapists to contend with, no? The courts are showing us there IS an overrepresentation of non-Irish men coming before them, however.
And that puts all women and children (migrant and Irish) at risk (and puts many living in fear and unable to do everyday things without worry, which is damaging to the psyche and to society overall, moving us from a high-trust, low-risk era into a now low-trust, high-risk era).
It appears this man was bailed despite the seriousness of the attack.
Which should not surprise anyone. Why care about locking up rapists when you don’t care about them getting in here in the first instance?
21.03.202511:39
Despite a huge increase in population (some small towns have doubled in size due to IPAS centres) and increases in crime....
●ONE IN TEN GARDA STATIONS IN IRELAND HAVE NO DESIGNATED GARDA and...
● As the number of small rural stations without an assigned officer increased by nine to 56 last year.
● Over a quarter of Garda stations had less Gardaí by the end of 2024 (than they did at the start of 2024).
● 129 of 567 Garda stations had a reduction in the number of Gardaí assigned to them last year.
● In Cavan town, the number of Gardaí fell from 94 to 63.
● Other stations with significant decreases were Anglesea Street in Cork (-26); Dundalk (-25); Mullingar (-24) and Ballyshannon, Co Donegal (-23).
● There were also several other stations where a decrease in staffing levels of 10 or more were recorded including Waterford (-16); Cahir (-14); Dún Laoghaire (-13); Thurles (-12); Claremorris (-12) and Clontarf (-11).
● An Garda Síochána grew last year, with a net increase of 193 gardaí to bring total numbers to 14,191.
When the number of gardaí not available for work due to career breaks, maternity leave, work-sharing, secondments and paternity leave were excluded, the strength of the force recorded a net increase of 206 to reach 13,979 – an annual increase of 1.5pc.
● Despite this, the number of frontline Gardaí attached to the network of 567 stations fell from 12,045 to 11,928 over the 12-month period – a net decrease of 117.
● The number of Garda reserves last year fell by 9.1pc last year – down 32 to 319.
● There have been some increases in Garda numbers but mostly concentrated in Dublin.
●ONE IN TEN GARDA STATIONS IN IRELAND HAVE NO DESIGNATED GARDA and...
● As the number of small rural stations without an assigned officer increased by nine to 56 last year.
● Over a quarter of Garda stations had less Gardaí by the end of 2024 (than they did at the start of 2024).
● 129 of 567 Garda stations had a reduction in the number of Gardaí assigned to them last year.
● In Cavan town, the number of Gardaí fell from 94 to 63.
● Other stations with significant decreases were Anglesea Street in Cork (-26); Dundalk (-25); Mullingar (-24) and Ballyshannon, Co Donegal (-23).
● There were also several other stations where a decrease in staffing levels of 10 or more were recorded including Waterford (-16); Cahir (-14); Dún Laoghaire (-13); Thurles (-12); Claremorris (-12) and Clontarf (-11).
● An Garda Síochána grew last year, with a net increase of 193 gardaí to bring total numbers to 14,191.
When the number of gardaí not available for work due to career breaks, maternity leave, work-sharing, secondments and paternity leave were excluded, the strength of the force recorded a net increase of 206 to reach 13,979 – an annual increase of 1.5pc.
● Despite this, the number of frontline Gardaí attached to the network of 567 stations fell from 12,045 to 11,928 over the 12-month period – a net decrease of 117.
● The number of Garda reserves last year fell by 9.1pc last year – down 32 to 319.
● There have been some increases in Garda numbers but mostly concentrated in Dublin.
post.reposted:Ar Aghaidh
19.03.202507:28
VIEW POINT: In December of last year a ‘briefing document’ was prepared by the Department of Integration in advance of the formation of the Government to explore policy for accommodating migrants going forward. I only became aware of this document over the weekend. For obvious reasons it was not publicised. The document outlines how public opposition is having the effect of making less accommodation centres available. It recorded that between august 2023 and august 2024 that there were ‘33 arson attacks’ against actual, planned or rumoured IPAS centres. This has resulted in a ‘marked drop’ in the number of properties offered for migrant accommodation. The document points out the obvious fact that accommodation owners are reluctant to make their properties available to International protection applicants.
There is also analysis of the range of opposition to the placing of migrant centres within communities. These are lumped together as ‘legal, local and criminal challenges’. You can almost sense the contempt that the Department of Integration holds communities in. The document states that the opposition to migrant centres is due to ‘diverse factors ranging from far right, anti immigration criminality to sincerely held concerns about local service capacity’. There is no mention about the safety of women and children, concerns about migrant violence or the islamification of society. The Department of Integration is deliberately choosing to not understand the real concerns of law abiding citizens and to contemptuously dismiss those concerns as ‘far right’ and ‘criminality’.
The document also refers to the number of ‘legal challenges’ against IPAS centres specifically referencing challenges to sites at Thornton Hall, Crooksling and Athlone. The briefing document stated that all these factors combine to bring ‘our capacity to deliver on government strategy into question’. In other words legitimate protest works. Because of this the Department of Integration has stopped opening centres in parts of the country that experienced protest in the past. The North Inner City is mentioned as a place that there will be no more migrant centres due to ‘local and political feedback’. Also the ‘last hotel in town’ will not be accepted either due to public opposition particularly in Kerry, Clare, Mayo and Donegal. There seems an acceptance that this migrant policy has decimated the tourist industry in many towns transforming them from tourist towns into rough refugee towns to the detriment of the safety of local people.
There is also a three speed system at work when it comes to providing accommodation. Ukrainian people are at the very top of the pecking order with International Protection Applicants underneath and Irish people at the bottom. This has resulted in cases where Ukrainian people have been moved out of hotels and the hotels have been reopened as hotels rather than given over for use by migrants. This has created another bottleneck for the Department of Integration resulting in almost four thousand international protection applicants sleeping rough. These are people who are for the most part undocumented and unvetted. Fingerprint data bases don’t exist in the countries that they come from. They represent a substantial safety risk to local communities. No risk assessment is ever carried out before migrants are pushed into towns and villages across our land and that of course is probably the main reason for popular uprisings in peaceful communities when they see that their safety and the safety of their loved ones has been recklessly put at risk by a government that is only interested in impressing their globalist masters.
But there is a very important message for everybody in this briefing document, the message that a united people can defeat the government and keep communities safe. Pressure works and government can and will back off if pressure is maintained. The Green Party and Sinn Fein dismissed the concerns of the people and got decimated. Government has noted well. Let’s keep the pressure on and keep our nation safe.
There is also analysis of the range of opposition to the placing of migrant centres within communities. These are lumped together as ‘legal, local and criminal challenges’. You can almost sense the contempt that the Department of Integration holds communities in. The document states that the opposition to migrant centres is due to ‘diverse factors ranging from far right, anti immigration criminality to sincerely held concerns about local service capacity’. There is no mention about the safety of women and children, concerns about migrant violence or the islamification of society. The Department of Integration is deliberately choosing to not understand the real concerns of law abiding citizens and to contemptuously dismiss those concerns as ‘far right’ and ‘criminality’.
The document also refers to the number of ‘legal challenges’ against IPAS centres specifically referencing challenges to sites at Thornton Hall, Crooksling and Athlone. The briefing document stated that all these factors combine to bring ‘our capacity to deliver on government strategy into question’. In other words legitimate protest works. Because of this the Department of Integration has stopped opening centres in parts of the country that experienced protest in the past. The North Inner City is mentioned as a place that there will be no more migrant centres due to ‘local and political feedback’. Also the ‘last hotel in town’ will not be accepted either due to public opposition particularly in Kerry, Clare, Mayo and Donegal. There seems an acceptance that this migrant policy has decimated the tourist industry in many towns transforming them from tourist towns into rough refugee towns to the detriment of the safety of local people.
There is also a three speed system at work when it comes to providing accommodation. Ukrainian people are at the very top of the pecking order with International Protection Applicants underneath and Irish people at the bottom. This has resulted in cases where Ukrainian people have been moved out of hotels and the hotels have been reopened as hotels rather than given over for use by migrants. This has created another bottleneck for the Department of Integration resulting in almost four thousand international protection applicants sleeping rough. These are people who are for the most part undocumented and unvetted. Fingerprint data bases don’t exist in the countries that they come from. They represent a substantial safety risk to local communities. No risk assessment is ever carried out before migrants are pushed into towns and villages across our land and that of course is probably the main reason for popular uprisings in peaceful communities when they see that their safety and the safety of their loved ones has been recklessly put at risk by a government that is only interested in impressing their globalist masters.
But there is a very important message for everybody in this briefing document, the message that a united people can defeat the government and keep communities safe. Pressure works and government can and will back off if pressure is maintained. The Green Party and Sinn Fein dismissed the concerns of the people and got decimated. Government has noted well. Let’s keep the pressure on and keep our nation safe.
07.04.202521:15
Do you agree with what Susanne Delaney says here about people who support Open Borders?
03.04.202513:11
What is ethnic cleansing by stealth? 🇮🇪
Your children's future is dead, and you buried it with a virtue-signalling nod and your loyalty to complete strangers from faraway lands.
Almost every story involves the opening of an IPAS centre - and as more open, more businesses in towns close down. Thus freeing up more buildings for more IPAS centres. Which will make rural Irish towns and villages desolate of any tourism, footfall (IPAS residents don't generally spend much in these towns), and young native people.
Your government is ethnically cleansing towns and villages (ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area). This was being done by stealth but is now being done openly. How can you not see?
Some Irish towns like Lisdoonvarna have more non Irish than Irish now... despite being a quintessential Irish tourist destination.
It's the governments doing.
But you, the people, vote for them. Despite that they actively work against you. They bow to supranational interests (the UN, the EU and so forth). They laugh at your naivete and compliance.
You mean nothing to them.
Your children mean nothing.
Our country means nothing.
RIP IRELAND 🇮🇪, I will mourn you forevermore.
Susanne Delaney
Your children's future is dead, and you buried it with a virtue-signalling nod and your loyalty to complete strangers from faraway lands.
Almost every story involves the opening of an IPAS centre - and as more open, more businesses in towns close down. Thus freeing up more buildings for more IPAS centres. Which will make rural Irish towns and villages desolate of any tourism, footfall (IPAS residents don't generally spend much in these towns), and young native people.
Your government is ethnically cleansing towns and villages (ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area). This was being done by stealth but is now being done openly. How can you not see?
Some Irish towns like Lisdoonvarna have more non Irish than Irish now... despite being a quintessential Irish tourist destination.
It's the governments doing.
But you, the people, vote for them. Despite that they actively work against you. They bow to supranational interests (the UN, the EU and so forth). They laugh at your naivete and compliance.
You mean nothing to them.
Your children mean nothing.
Our country means nothing.
RIP IRELAND 🇮🇪, I will mourn you forevermore.
Susanne Delaney
01.04.202517:43
DO THE MATH 👇!! (I’ve done it for you)
Read on below...
Read on below...
26.03.202514:44
You can't add visiting a dead relative to the list of things you can do safely anymore. Some people might fear ghosts in such places, but what about unvetted migrant rapists? (The alleged rapist is a Somalian man; more than 99% of Somalis are Sunni Muslims who follow Sharia law.) Once again, let’s ask ourselves: WHO does it benefit to allow largely undocumented, illegal migrants into our country?
Read on below...
Read on below...
21.03.202511:39
Despite a huge increase in population (some small towns have doubled in size due to IPAS centres) and increases in crime....
18.03.202510:01
Does Conor McGregor represent your views here in #Ireland?
@TheNotoriousMMA's invitation to the @WhiteHouse on #StPatricksDay is a humiliating blow to @MichealMartinTD and
@SimonHarrisTD.
Regardless of your opinion on McGregor, he addressed the primary concern weighing on the minds of the #Irish people. Tell us what you think: does Conor McGregor represent your views?"
#SaveIreland from #MassImmigration
@TheNotoriousMMA's invitation to the @WhiteHouse on #StPatricksDay is a humiliating blow to @MichealMartinTD and
@SimonHarrisTD.
Regardless of your opinion on McGregor, he addressed the primary concern weighing on the minds of the #Irish people. Tell us what you think: does Conor McGregor represent your views?"
#SaveIreland from #MassImmigration
03.04.202513:11
What is ethnic cleansing by stealth? 🇮🇪
Read on below...
Read on below...
01.04.202515:49
Yet another non-profit telling Irish people how racist they are (while not disclosing who funds them, why not?)
The Unforgettable Women's Network @TUWNIreland (TUWN) talks about "the centrality of race and whiteness in the Irish Labour market" and "microaggressions" against Black women in the Irish workplace.
They do not disclose their public funding but it is likely they receive partial funding from the National Women's Council @NWCI, (and therefore the taxpayer because the NWC receives 80% of their funding from the government) given the NWC counts TUWN as one of its "members" (groups they support).
Last year Jennifer Okeke became the first Black woman to become chairperson of the NWC (seen here pictured in @irishexaminer).
The Unforgettable Women's Network is backed by Dr. @EbunJoseph1 (see here: https://x.com/SuzieD755164/status/1906953958003740742?t=DdAcZR78sUeM0VLbNmXWDQ&s=19) who was recently platformed by RTE news to tell Irish people how racist they are.
The Unforgettable Women's Network @TUWNIreland (TUWN) talks about "the centrality of race and whiteness in the Irish Labour market" and "microaggressions" against Black women in the Irish workplace.
They do not disclose their public funding but it is likely they receive partial funding from the National Women's Council @NWCI, (and therefore the taxpayer because the NWC receives 80% of their funding from the government) given the NWC counts TUWN as one of its "members" (groups they support).
Last year Jennifer Okeke became the first Black woman to become chairperson of the NWC (seen here pictured in @irishexaminer).
The Unforgettable Women's Network is backed by Dr. @EbunJoseph1 (see here: https://x.com/SuzieD755164/status/1906953958003740742?t=DdAcZR78sUeM0VLbNmXWDQ&s=19) who was recently platformed by RTE news to tell Irish people how racist they are.
post.reposted:Ar Aghaidh
26.03.202511:10
VIEW POINT: Dr Matthew Doré is the honorary secretary of the Association for Palliative Medicine. He has expressed concern on behalf of his organisation that ‘prognosis’ will be used as a safeguard in allowing patients the right to die in assisted dying legislation proposed for in the UK and that may well be a model for legislation proposed for in this country. The proposed safeguard against abuse is that patients must have a life prognosis of six months or less to avail of the legislation. But it has now been shown that approximately 20% of patients given a prognosis of six months or less are alive after three years. This information arose from a freedom of information request linking urgent payments made to the terminally ill and the length of those payments. 20% were still receiving payment after three years. While this may be surprising for many people it is not too surprising for doctors who have seen dramatic improvements in end of life care in recent years. These statistics just show the difficulties in determining how long somebody is likely to live. The proposed legislation suggests that two doctors will form the opinion that a terminally ill patient has only six months to live. But in 20% of cases these predictions were wrong by a factor of three years. If assisted dying was available and if that option was sought and granted based on that prediction useful life would have been cut off prematurely in many cases.
20.03.202519:56
FOOT MASSAGES, PONY LESSONS, LUXURY CAR REPAIRS, "JOBPLUS", SPECIAL PRIVILEGES & GRANTS: ARE IRISH PEOPLE BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE?
Article below by Susanne Delaney...
Article below by Susanne Delaney...
03.04.202512:01
Stand and Deliver
Conor McGregor must make an appearance and speak at Easter demonstration to prove his credentials.
By: Stephen Sutton
"If Conor McGregor is serious about helping Ireland and the Irish people, he simply must be in attendance on the day. No excuses. It is up to the organisers to reach out to him, to provide for him a platform to address the people he wishes to represent. Going to the White House to alert Irish America as to the nature of our plight was a good thing, addressing the streetwise, cynical, battle-hardened people of your hometown, on the streets where you grew up, could perhaps be an even greater thing. If you are to be taken seriously by nationalists @TheNotoriousMMA, this is an opportunity you must not allow to pass you by. It is a gesture the nationalist community will demand if you are to receive our support going forward."
Read Full Article Here... https://tinyurl.com/mt75nh58
Conor McGregor must make an appearance and speak at Easter demonstration to prove his credentials.
By: Stephen Sutton
"If Conor McGregor is serious about helping Ireland and the Irish people, he simply must be in attendance on the day. No excuses. It is up to the organisers to reach out to him, to provide for him a platform to address the people he wishes to represent. Going to the White House to alert Irish America as to the nature of our plight was a good thing, addressing the streetwise, cynical, battle-hardened people of your hometown, on the streets where you grew up, could perhaps be an even greater thing. If you are to be taken seriously by nationalists @TheNotoriousMMA, this is an opportunity you must not allow to pass you by. It is a gesture the nationalist community will demand if you are to receive our support going forward."
Read Full Article Here... https://tinyurl.com/mt75nh58
30.03.202513:08
Know thine enemy: Irish people, PAY ATTENTION! You need to start recognising a disturbing reality; our defacto "leaders" are seemingly partaking in a deliberate campaign of demoralising, degrading and goading us. It's a psychological tool of war. Last year they USED Mother's Day to attempt to bolster their campaign of removing "mother" and "woman" from our sacred constitution under grossly false pretences, this year Mother's Day is not even acknowleged, but Eid is (so much for respecting mothers and women... by honouring a religion that views women and girls as second class citizens).
post.reposted:Ar Aghaidh
25.03.202508:01
VIEW POINT: One of the most important elements of research is long term follow up so that unintended consequences of therapy can be identified and adjustments made. That may result in a drug or therapy being withdrawn or modified. Some long term follow ups have lasted for decades and are still ongoing. Studies on cardiovascular health and studies on the influence of diet particularly spring to mind. These are universally agreed safeguards embraced by all branches of medicine with one exception. That exception is transgender care.
What is remarkable about transgender care is the total absence of quality long term follow up studies. This glaring omission was highlighted in the Cass Report but still it is not a topic of concern for government or advocacy groups. The absence of follow up studies seems based on the assumption that they are not needed. If one has a ‘problem’, for example if biological sex and gender don’t align and if that ‘problem’ is fixed then there is no need to follow up. That appears to be the attitude of transgender care advocates. If that assumption is questioned the person who questions it becomes ‘transphobic’ and that can result in attacks on social media and professional damage. It is easier to say nothing, to avoid becoming involved or simply leave the whole area of transgender care to adgendaists, the pharmaceutical industry and weak government.
A question that is never asked but yet should be central in charting a way forward with transgender care is whether this is a medical issue or a social phenomenon. Central to the transgender issue is whether biological sex and gender are different and disconnected. The theory is that sometimes they align and sometimes they do not. Gender is a choice based on how you feel and that is how you should be defined, biological sex is different and must be modified if possible to fit in with your gender, your real self. That is the theory. This means that your ‘feelings’ should be accepted and not challenged according to transgender activists. This is called affirmative care, the child’s belief is taken at face value, as fact. Yet in all other medical conditions based on ‘feelings’ your belief would be challenged. No physician would agree with a depressed person who wants to end his life that that choice would be best without challenging that belief. The same would apply to the anorexic person who believes that they should loose weight. Again such a belief would be challenged. Yet a belief that one is born in a wrong body and that irreversible life changing surgery is necessary is not challenged. In fact to do so is hateful. This is the total perversion of medical care as I understand such care to be.
Social phenomena come and go and were traditionally associated with the type of clothes your wore and the music you listened to. The ‘mods and rockers’ have had their day as have the ‘goths and punks’. Now the glue is social media, not clothes or music. Children that are marginalised for whatever reason are easy prey for transgender influencers. This particularly applies to children who are in the autistic spectrum. An academic article published in Nature Communications by Warrior et al in August 2020 showed higher rates of autism and psychiatric conditions in children who identify as transgender. The autism rate amongst children who identify as transgender is between three and six times higher than in the normal population depending on which academic article you read.
It is essential to challenge the belief as one would do with any other situation that has life changing consequences. The same standards should apply in transgender care as applies everywhere else. Lobbyists should have no place in clinical decision making. Reject transgender ideology and support young people by offering real help and support that will get them over a difficult period in their lives.
What is remarkable about transgender care is the total absence of quality long term follow up studies. This glaring omission was highlighted in the Cass Report but still it is not a topic of concern for government or advocacy groups. The absence of follow up studies seems based on the assumption that they are not needed. If one has a ‘problem’, for example if biological sex and gender don’t align and if that ‘problem’ is fixed then there is no need to follow up. That appears to be the attitude of transgender care advocates. If that assumption is questioned the person who questions it becomes ‘transphobic’ and that can result in attacks on social media and professional damage. It is easier to say nothing, to avoid becoming involved or simply leave the whole area of transgender care to adgendaists, the pharmaceutical industry and weak government.
A question that is never asked but yet should be central in charting a way forward with transgender care is whether this is a medical issue or a social phenomenon. Central to the transgender issue is whether biological sex and gender are different and disconnected. The theory is that sometimes they align and sometimes they do not. Gender is a choice based on how you feel and that is how you should be defined, biological sex is different and must be modified if possible to fit in with your gender, your real self. That is the theory. This means that your ‘feelings’ should be accepted and not challenged according to transgender activists. This is called affirmative care, the child’s belief is taken at face value, as fact. Yet in all other medical conditions based on ‘feelings’ your belief would be challenged. No physician would agree with a depressed person who wants to end his life that that choice would be best without challenging that belief. The same would apply to the anorexic person who believes that they should loose weight. Again such a belief would be challenged. Yet a belief that one is born in a wrong body and that irreversible life changing surgery is necessary is not challenged. In fact to do so is hateful. This is the total perversion of medical care as I understand such care to be.
Social phenomena come and go and were traditionally associated with the type of clothes your wore and the music you listened to. The ‘mods and rockers’ have had their day as have the ‘goths and punks’. Now the glue is social media, not clothes or music. Children that are marginalised for whatever reason are easy prey for transgender influencers. This particularly applies to children who are in the autistic spectrum. An academic article published in Nature Communications by Warrior et al in August 2020 showed higher rates of autism and psychiatric conditions in children who identify as transgender. The autism rate amongst children who identify as transgender is between three and six times higher than in the normal population depending on which academic article you read.
It is essential to challenge the belief as one would do with any other situation that has life changing consequences. The same standards should apply in transgender care as applies everywhere else. Lobbyists should have no place in clinical decision making. Reject transgender ideology and support young people by offering real help and support that will get them over a difficult period in their lives.
20.03.202519:56
FOOT MASSAGES, PONY LESSONS, LUXURY CAR REPAIRS, "JOBPLUS", SPECIAL PRIVILEGES & GRANTS: ARE IRISH PEOPLE BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE?
By Susanne Delaney
Expensive reflexology foot massages are being made available to Ukrainian refugees and IPAS clients. This is happening in at least one clinic that I am aware of. I personally know the person providing that service and can guarantee this is happening (taxi services are provided also). Like the garage owner who recently spoke of massive car repair bills being paid for by government departments (with taxpayer money), this person has seen the outrageous absurdity of refugee and IPAS spending.
In addition to (sometimes luxury) car repairs (up to €7,000 in one instance), there have been several claims made online that some Ukrainians are receiving €50 pony lessons provided twice a week. I cannot verify this, but I would be more surprised if this was not true than I would be if it is true.
Last week, my own daughter asked if she could start horse-riding lessons, to which I had to say no. She was disappointed, but at least she's not waiting for something necessary and urgent. There are many children awaiting spinal surgery, child mental health, or special needs services.
What the hell is going on?
The likes of Simon Harris (@SimonHarrisTD) would say I'm pitting Irish people against poor refugees and asylum seekers. But to that, I say, no, Simon Harris.
You are.
Why are Irish people being sabotaged, undermined, and ripped off?
Why are they being treated like second-class citizens?
Why are they being given fewer opportunities? Fewer privileges? Zero respect?
Why are we seemingly being forced out of our own country? Out of the rental market? The purchasable-housing market? The jobs market? Why can't we afford to have kids despite working so hard?
We know who pays your wages Simon Harris (and co).
But who do you really work for?
Why do you despise your own people so much?
Aside from all these freebies given to people (some of whom are evidently well off and own high-end cars), why are they also allowed to work while still receiving free rent, food and utilities? (A minimum-wage job is well-paid when you have no expenses.)
How can Irish people compete?
Why do employers get between €7,500 and €10,000 to take on IPAS applicants and refugees under the JobsPlus scheme? Irish people can avail of this but generally must be on Jobseekers (or other payments) for 24 months before being eligible for the grant, whereas there's no qualifying period for asylum seekers or refugees. There are some exceptions (e.g., for Travellers, they have to be on a payment for 4 months), but in most instances, 24 months is the required period for Irish people.
If you were an employer, who would you take on? The person who brings you up to €10,000? Or the one who doesn't?
Then, there's the ARP payment for Ukrainians, which is likely to be extended to 2026 under an EU Directive. This €800 payment is only given to those who will rent rooms to Ukrainians.
Additionally, since 2022, NGOs and local councils (e.g., Ukrainian Action in Ireland) are offering grants of up to €1,000 to Ukrainians for "integration, entrepreneurial ideas and other projects", and IPAS, once granted refugee status, can receive similar payments through the Irish Refugee Council (NGO) and HSE-funded programs.
Furthermore, while there is technically no recruitment moratorium on hiring Irish healthcare workers, the HSE has implemented a "Pay and Numbers Strategy", which essentially functions as a recruitment moratorium on Irish healthcare workers by another name. Meanwhile, recruitment companies are paid up to €15,000 per non-Irish healthcare worker they recruit (giving an incentive to perhaps not be thorough in vetting), and these workers are provided with accommodation for the first few months that they work here.
Now, after reading this, tell me that we aren't being taken for a ride.
The question is, why? I think I know the answer.
Do you?
By Susanne Delaney
Expensive reflexology foot massages are being made available to Ukrainian refugees and IPAS clients. This is happening in at least one clinic that I am aware of. I personally know the person providing that service and can guarantee this is happening (taxi services are provided also). Like the garage owner who recently spoke of massive car repair bills being paid for by government departments (with taxpayer money), this person has seen the outrageous absurdity of refugee and IPAS spending.
In addition to (sometimes luxury) car repairs (up to €7,000 in one instance), there have been several claims made online that some Ukrainians are receiving €50 pony lessons provided twice a week. I cannot verify this, but I would be more surprised if this was not true than I would be if it is true.
Last week, my own daughter asked if she could start horse-riding lessons, to which I had to say no. She was disappointed, but at least she's not waiting for something necessary and urgent. There are many children awaiting spinal surgery, child mental health, or special needs services.
What the hell is going on?
The likes of Simon Harris (@SimonHarrisTD) would say I'm pitting Irish people against poor refugees and asylum seekers. But to that, I say, no, Simon Harris.
You are.
Why are Irish people being sabotaged, undermined, and ripped off?
Why are they being treated like second-class citizens?
Why are they being given fewer opportunities? Fewer privileges? Zero respect?
Why are we seemingly being forced out of our own country? Out of the rental market? The purchasable-housing market? The jobs market? Why can't we afford to have kids despite working so hard?
We know who pays your wages Simon Harris (and co).
But who do you really work for?
Why do you despise your own people so much?
Aside from all these freebies given to people (some of whom are evidently well off and own high-end cars), why are they also allowed to work while still receiving free rent, food and utilities? (A minimum-wage job is well-paid when you have no expenses.)
How can Irish people compete?
Why do employers get between €7,500 and €10,000 to take on IPAS applicants and refugees under the JobsPlus scheme? Irish people can avail of this but generally must be on Jobseekers (or other payments) for 24 months before being eligible for the grant, whereas there's no qualifying period for asylum seekers or refugees. There are some exceptions (e.g., for Travellers, they have to be on a payment for 4 months), but in most instances, 24 months is the required period for Irish people.
If you were an employer, who would you take on? The person who brings you up to €10,000? Or the one who doesn't?
Then, there's the ARP payment for Ukrainians, which is likely to be extended to 2026 under an EU Directive. This €800 payment is only given to those who will rent rooms to Ukrainians.
Additionally, since 2022, NGOs and local councils (e.g., Ukrainian Action in Ireland) are offering grants of up to €1,000 to Ukrainians for "integration, entrepreneurial ideas and other projects", and IPAS, once granted refugee status, can receive similar payments through the Irish Refugee Council (NGO) and HSE-funded programs.
Furthermore, while there is technically no recruitment moratorium on hiring Irish healthcare workers, the HSE has implemented a "Pay and Numbers Strategy", which essentially functions as a recruitment moratorium on Irish healthcare workers by another name. Meanwhile, recruitment companies are paid up to €15,000 per non-Irish healthcare worker they recruit (giving an incentive to perhaps not be thorough in vetting), and these workers are provided with accommodation for the first few months that they work here.
Now, after reading this, tell me that we aren't being taken for a ride.
The question is, why? I think I know the answer.
Do you?
15.03.202513:37
SERIOUS QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED ABOUT ABOUT THIS SERIAL RAPIST & KIDNAPPER 👇 🇮🇪
1. Was the rapist given lesser sentence than was possible? "I cannot ignore the defendant’s appalling previous convictions" (see below) said Judge McGrath, noting the only mitigating factor was the Guyana native "is a foreign national serving time in an Irish prison."
2. The sentence that could have been given in this case was 10 to 15 years, according to articles. He only received 10. Given aggravating factors (false imprisonment) Why was the sentence not longer? Is this because of the above mitigating factor? Why was the fact he is a serial rapist and kidnapper not enough to warrant a tougher sentence?
3. Legal counsel for Randi Gladstone said his is a foreign national, and serving time in an Irish prison would be difficult (and added "I respectfully say that this [crime] falls below the ten-year level"). Why should being a foreign national who "prison would be difficult for" be a valid argument? We have seen a number of foreign national rapists get less prison time for this reason. Do the crime, do the time, no? Do foreign nationals have an advantage over Irish criminals? It would seem so. Particles rapists. Hardly a deterrant, is it? And how exactly would a man who lived in the UK for 24 years have difficulty with the Englsih language? (See below for examples).
4. Was this man an asylum seeker (and if so, HOW? see 5 & 6 below)? The crime took place at a "holiday village" and, more specifically, in his hotel room. The girl was staying with her family and had been for "several days." Mr. Gladstone was also staying there for "several days" when the crime was committed. He had only just arrived in Ireland.
5. If he was accepted as an asylum seeker here, questions need to be asked about how this was allowed.. He was resident for at least 24 years in the UK (as his "appalling crimes there date back to at least 2001). When he raped the young woman, he tried to flee from Ireland back to the UK, but he was bared from entering the country because his crimes there were so bad.
6. Why was he not denied entry (if he is an AS) on the grounds of being in another safe country so long and on the basis of his criminal behaviour?
7. Was he background checked? Most likely not. If he was, then the government would need to explain why they let a serial convicted rapist and kidnapper into our country regardless.
8. What were his crimes previously to committing rape within a few days of arrival here? He has 19 previous convictions from the UK, including for for rape, kidnapping, robbery, and false imprisonment.
9. Why was no deportation order made during sentencing? There is no order requiring Randi Gladstone to leave Ireland once he has completed his sentence.
10. Who really is Randi Gladstone? It's not a very Guyanan sounding name, is it? That sounds like a fake name. What did he do before he ever reached the UK? And what will he do here once he is released?
Just two of many examples:
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/courts/2023/01/16/rapist-given-extraordinarily-lenient-sentence-because-he-cant-speak-english-court-hears/
"State appeals six-and-a-half year sentence for Costel Pirvu (39) who raped and imprisoned woman with mild intellectual disabilities."
https://www.thejournal.ie/court-asylum-seeker-rape-2633638-Feb2016/
"Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy noted the attack had a serious effect on the woman but also had to take into account that Udeh was a foreign national and had entered a guilty plea."
1. Was the rapist given lesser sentence than was possible? "I cannot ignore the defendant’s appalling previous convictions" (see below) said Judge McGrath, noting the only mitigating factor was the Guyana native "is a foreign national serving time in an Irish prison."
2. The sentence that could have been given in this case was 10 to 15 years, according to articles. He only received 10. Given aggravating factors (false imprisonment) Why was the sentence not longer? Is this because of the above mitigating factor? Why was the fact he is a serial rapist and kidnapper not enough to warrant a tougher sentence?
3. Legal counsel for Randi Gladstone said his is a foreign national, and serving time in an Irish prison would be difficult (and added "I respectfully say that this [crime] falls below the ten-year level"). Why should being a foreign national who "prison would be difficult for" be a valid argument? We have seen a number of foreign national rapists get less prison time for this reason. Do the crime, do the time, no? Do foreign nationals have an advantage over Irish criminals? It would seem so. Particles rapists. Hardly a deterrant, is it? And how exactly would a man who lived in the UK for 24 years have difficulty with the Englsih language? (See below for examples).
4. Was this man an asylum seeker (and if so, HOW? see 5 & 6 below)? The crime took place at a "holiday village" and, more specifically, in his hotel room. The girl was staying with her family and had been for "several days." Mr. Gladstone was also staying there for "several days" when the crime was committed. He had only just arrived in Ireland.
5. If he was accepted as an asylum seeker here, questions need to be asked about how this was allowed.. He was resident for at least 24 years in the UK (as his "appalling crimes there date back to at least 2001). When he raped the young woman, he tried to flee from Ireland back to the UK, but he was bared from entering the country because his crimes there were so bad.
6. Why was he not denied entry (if he is an AS) on the grounds of being in another safe country so long and on the basis of his criminal behaviour?
7. Was he background checked? Most likely not. If he was, then the government would need to explain why they let a serial convicted rapist and kidnapper into our country regardless.
8. What were his crimes previously to committing rape within a few days of arrival here? He has 19 previous convictions from the UK, including for for rape, kidnapping, robbery, and false imprisonment.
9. Why was no deportation order made during sentencing? There is no order requiring Randi Gladstone to leave Ireland once he has completed his sentence.
10. Who really is Randi Gladstone? It's not a very Guyanan sounding name, is it? That sounds like a fake name. What did he do before he ever reached the UK? And what will he do here once he is released?
Just two of many examples:
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/courts/2023/01/16/rapist-given-extraordinarily-lenient-sentence-because-he-cant-speak-english-court-hears/
"State appeals six-and-a-half year sentence for Costel Pirvu (39) who raped and imprisoned woman with mild intellectual disabilities."
https://www.thejournal.ie/court-asylum-seeker-rape-2633638-Feb2016/
"Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy noted the attack had a serious effect on the woman but also had to take into account that Udeh was a foreign national and had entered a guilty plea."
Показано 1 - 24 из 156
Войдите, чтобы разблокировать больше функциональности.