Pariah Media
Hard-hitting, no-nonsense, real investigative journalism. Unrestrained! Unrelenting! Unafraid!
Editor-in-Chief at nzindustryinsight.co.nz
Editor-in-Chief at nzindustryinsight.co.nz
Рейтинг TGlist
0
0
ТипПубличный
Верификация
Не верифицированныйДоверенность
Не провернныйРасположение
ЯзыкДругой
Дата создания каналаЛист 12, 2024
Добавлено на TGlist
Бер 25, 2025Рекорды
26.04.202523:59
284Подписчиков25.11.202423:59
0Индекс цитирования24.03.202513:08
1.6KОхват одного поста31.03.202516:02
463Охват рекламного поста26.04.202523:59
26.74%ER24.03.202516:02
590.15%ERRpost.reposted:
NZ Loyal TRULY OFFICIAL for 2026!
25.04.202503:07
Anzac Day message from NZ Loyal Leader Kelvyn Alp!
https://nzloyal.com/message-from-the-grave/
https://nzloyal.com/message-from-the-grave/
post.reposted:
Dr. Sam Bailey Official
22.04.202508:53
We’ve all blamed a virus at some point — rash, fever, fatigue, auto-immune issues. But what if the virus model itself is the real problem?
🔎 “If it’s not a virus, then what is making us sick?”
Here are 40 reasons to reconsider everything you’ve been told.
👉 Watch the full video HERE
🔎 “If it’s not a virus, then what is making us sick?”
Here are 40 reasons to reconsider everything you’ve been told.
👉 Watch the full video HERE
16.04.202513:01
The Shell Game
By Kelvyn Alp
Kiwis, wake up. The world’s a rigged casino, and you’re not the house. The same entities peddling “deliverance” from evil are the ones pulling the strings - globalists, politicians, and their corporate mates. They dangle hope like a carrot, keeping you hooked on promises of truth while you abandon your own logic. Don’t fall for it. This is the shell game, and the pea’s never under the cup. Look at history.
The official stories of 9/11, the UK’s 7/7 bombings, Israel’s October 7th, Tasmania’s Port Arthur massacre, and our own Christchurch mosque attacks? They crumble under scrutiny. Yet inquiries and investigations are scripted before they start. Why? Because the outcomes were decided long ago.
These aren’t random tragedies - they’re moves on a chessboard, planned to control you. The psychopathic elite don’t care about your pain. They bank on it.
You’ve been conditioned to obey since birth. From the moment you’re born, you’re legally a slave - registered, numbered, and owned without your consent. No one told you.
Schools drill compliance into kids, teaching them to follow orders, not question them. Today’s children are targeted harder than ever - indoctrinated through screens, curricula, and fear. Control the kids, and you control the future. Rewrite history, erase inconvenient truths, and you’ve got a world of unquestioning minions ready to defend their chains.
The system thrives on confusion, distrust, and division. It pits mate against mate, ensuring you’re too busy fighting each other to notice the real enemy.
Those who dare stand up - whistleblowers, truth-tellers - are crushed as warnings. Step out of line, and you’re next.
But here’s the kicker: authority isn’t real. It’s a lie. Someone claims power over you, and most nod along, indoctrinated to comply.
Politicians, the enablers of this scam, pass laws to tighten the globalists’ grip. They control every lever - courts, media, police - ensuring your subjugation. Politics isn’t the answer, but it’s the battlefield. Ignoring it, hands victory to the enslavers.
You’re not helpless. There are at least three ways to fight back:
1. The Ballot Box: Overwhelm the rigged system. Vote for those who reject the globalist agenda, but don’t just vote - organize, demand transparency, and hold politicians’ feet to the fire. Apathy is surrender.
2. The Ammo Box: If push comes to shove, you may have to fight for your right to exist as a free man or woman. History shows freedom isn’t given - it’s taken. Be ready.
3. The Land Grab: Pool resources, aquire a large chunk of land, and declare your own nation-state, for example, under the 1933 Montevideo Convention. It’s legal, bold, and a middle finger to the system.
This isn’t about hippie vibes or manifesting nonsense. It’s about seeing the world for what it is and acting. You’re not just a cog in their machine - you’re a New Zealander with a backbone. All of you have a stake in this. The system wants you docile, distracted, or dead. Prove them wrong.
Our voice refuses to bow. The truth will keep flowing, no matter how hard they try to silence it.
Join the fight. Question everything. Act now. Your future, your kids’ future, depends on it.
The political solution - nzloyal.com
#pariahmedia #everyonefollowers #followme
Image credit: txsc.org
By Kelvyn Alp
Kiwis, wake up. The world’s a rigged casino, and you’re not the house. The same entities peddling “deliverance” from evil are the ones pulling the strings - globalists, politicians, and their corporate mates. They dangle hope like a carrot, keeping you hooked on promises of truth while you abandon your own logic. Don’t fall for it. This is the shell game, and the pea’s never under the cup. Look at history.
The official stories of 9/11, the UK’s 7/7 bombings, Israel’s October 7th, Tasmania’s Port Arthur massacre, and our own Christchurch mosque attacks? They crumble under scrutiny. Yet inquiries and investigations are scripted before they start. Why? Because the outcomes were decided long ago.
These aren’t random tragedies - they’re moves on a chessboard, planned to control you. The psychopathic elite don’t care about your pain. They bank on it.
You’ve been conditioned to obey since birth. From the moment you’re born, you’re legally a slave - registered, numbered, and owned without your consent. No one told you.
Schools drill compliance into kids, teaching them to follow orders, not question them. Today’s children are targeted harder than ever - indoctrinated through screens, curricula, and fear. Control the kids, and you control the future. Rewrite history, erase inconvenient truths, and you’ve got a world of unquestioning minions ready to defend their chains.
The system thrives on confusion, distrust, and division. It pits mate against mate, ensuring you’re too busy fighting each other to notice the real enemy.
Those who dare stand up - whistleblowers, truth-tellers - are crushed as warnings. Step out of line, and you’re next.
But here’s the kicker: authority isn’t real. It’s a lie. Someone claims power over you, and most nod along, indoctrinated to comply.
Politicians, the enablers of this scam, pass laws to tighten the globalists’ grip. They control every lever - courts, media, police - ensuring your subjugation. Politics isn’t the answer, but it’s the battlefield. Ignoring it, hands victory to the enslavers.
You’re not helpless. There are at least three ways to fight back:
1. The Ballot Box: Overwhelm the rigged system. Vote for those who reject the globalist agenda, but don’t just vote - organize, demand transparency, and hold politicians’ feet to the fire. Apathy is surrender.
2. The Ammo Box: If push comes to shove, you may have to fight for your right to exist as a free man or woman. History shows freedom isn’t given - it’s taken. Be ready.
3. The Land Grab: Pool resources, aquire a large chunk of land, and declare your own nation-state, for example, under the 1933 Montevideo Convention. It’s legal, bold, and a middle finger to the system.
This isn’t about hippie vibes or manifesting nonsense. It’s about seeing the world for what it is and acting. You’re not just a cog in their machine - you’re a New Zealander with a backbone. All of you have a stake in this. The system wants you docile, distracted, or dead. Prove them wrong.
Our voice refuses to bow. The truth will keep flowing, no matter how hard they try to silence it.
Join the fight. Question everything. Act now. Your future, your kids’ future, depends on it.
The political solution - nzloyal.com
#pariahmedia #everyonefollowers #followme
Image credit: txsc.org
22.04.202510:29
The Inquiry Racket: How New Zealand’s State Launders Its Sins!
By Kelvyn Alp
The article from Newsroom lays bare a festering wound in New Zealand’s so-called “system of justice” - a system that’s proven, yet again, to be a sham. The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care, the largest of its kind, exposed a grotesque regime of denial, minimization, and cover-up orchestrated by the state to shield its own rotten core. And what’s the outcome? Nothing. Not a single public servant implicated in this decades-long scandal will face so much as a slap on the wrist. This is not justice; it’s a middle finger to every survivor who dared to speak out, and to every citizen who naively believed the state might hold itself accountable.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops since day one: these inquiries are nothing but feel-good, taxpayer-funded theater. They’re meticulously crafted to give the illusion of action while ensuring the powerful walk free. The Abuse in Care inquiry is just the latest in a long line of window-dressing exercises - glossy reports, tearful apologies, and zero consequences. Look at the historical record: the Royal Commission on the Pike River Mine disaster produced 16 recommendations, yet no one was prosecuted for the 29 deaths. The inquiry into the Christchurch mosque attacks churned out pages of “findings,” but the systemic failures of intelligence and policing were quietly swept under the rug, not to mention state involvement. And don’t get me started on the endless probes into mental health services or child poverty - each one a parade of platitudes that changed nothing for the vulnerable. These inquiries are a financial racket, funneling millions into the pockets of retired judges, lawyers, counselors, and consultants who feast on the public purse while delivering carefully worded reports designed to protect the establishment.
And mark my words, the Covid inquiries - both of them - will follow the exact same script. Expect more hand-wringing, more “lessons learned,” and absolutely no accountability for the bureaucrats and politicians who bungled the response, eroded freedoms, and tanked the economy. These inquiries aren’t about truth; they’re about laundering the state’s sins and paying lip service to the public’s outrage. The same insiders who profited from the crisis will profit from the “investigation,” while the people get screwed - again.
This isn’t incompetence; it’s a feature, not a bug. The state protects its own, always has, always will. The Newsroom article quotes a lawyer who’s fought for survivors for 30 years, unsurprised that the state is shielding its implicated servants. Why? Because this is how the game is played. Senior public servants like the Solicitor-General and Education Secretary, named in the cover-up, still sit comfortably in their cushy offices, untouched by the inquiry’s findings. The message is clear: the powerful are untouchable, and the victims - those abused, tortured, and silenced - are just collateral damage in the state’s quest to preserve its own reputation.
Enough is enough. If you’re waiting for justice from this broken system, you’re delusional. The only way to see real accountability is to tear it all down. We need a completely new government, one free from the current crop of self-serving parliamentarians who’ve grown fat on our trust. The entire political and state apparatus - rotten to its core - needs a total overhaul. No more inquiries, no more reports, no more excuses. The people deserve a system that punishes the guilty, not one that hands them a free pass while survivors are left to pick up the pieces. Until we demand this, we’re just shouting into the void, and the state will keep laughing all the way to the bank.
Real political leadership with the guts to do the job - nzloyal.com
By Kelvyn Alp
The article from Newsroom lays bare a festering wound in New Zealand’s so-called “system of justice” - a system that’s proven, yet again, to be a sham. The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care, the largest of its kind, exposed a grotesque regime of denial, minimization, and cover-up orchestrated by the state to shield its own rotten core. And what’s the outcome? Nothing. Not a single public servant implicated in this decades-long scandal will face so much as a slap on the wrist. This is not justice; it’s a middle finger to every survivor who dared to speak out, and to every citizen who naively believed the state might hold itself accountable.
I’ve been screaming this from the rooftops since day one: these inquiries are nothing but feel-good, taxpayer-funded theater. They’re meticulously crafted to give the illusion of action while ensuring the powerful walk free. The Abuse in Care inquiry is just the latest in a long line of window-dressing exercises - glossy reports, tearful apologies, and zero consequences. Look at the historical record: the Royal Commission on the Pike River Mine disaster produced 16 recommendations, yet no one was prosecuted for the 29 deaths. The inquiry into the Christchurch mosque attacks churned out pages of “findings,” but the systemic failures of intelligence and policing were quietly swept under the rug, not to mention state involvement. And don’t get me started on the endless probes into mental health services or child poverty - each one a parade of platitudes that changed nothing for the vulnerable. These inquiries are a financial racket, funneling millions into the pockets of retired judges, lawyers, counselors, and consultants who feast on the public purse while delivering carefully worded reports designed to protect the establishment.
And mark my words, the Covid inquiries - both of them - will follow the exact same script. Expect more hand-wringing, more “lessons learned,” and absolutely no accountability for the bureaucrats and politicians who bungled the response, eroded freedoms, and tanked the economy. These inquiries aren’t about truth; they’re about laundering the state’s sins and paying lip service to the public’s outrage. The same insiders who profited from the crisis will profit from the “investigation,” while the people get screwed - again.
This isn’t incompetence; it’s a feature, not a bug. The state protects its own, always has, always will. The Newsroom article quotes a lawyer who’s fought for survivors for 30 years, unsurprised that the state is shielding its implicated servants. Why? Because this is how the game is played. Senior public servants like the Solicitor-General and Education Secretary, named in the cover-up, still sit comfortably in their cushy offices, untouched by the inquiry’s findings. The message is clear: the powerful are untouchable, and the victims - those abused, tortured, and silenced - are just collateral damage in the state’s quest to preserve its own reputation.
Enough is enough. If you’re waiting for justice from this broken system, you’re delusional. The only way to see real accountability is to tear it all down. We need a completely new government, one free from the current crop of self-serving parliamentarians who’ve grown fat on our trust. The entire political and state apparatus - rotten to its core - needs a total overhaul. No more inquiries, no more reports, no more excuses. The people deserve a system that punishes the guilty, not one that hands them a free pass while survivors are left to pick up the pieces. Until we demand this, we’re just shouting into the void, and the state will keep laughing all the way to the bank.
Real political leadership with the guts to do the job - nzloyal.com
29.03.202504:40
A Call to Action: Confronting the Enemies of Freedom
By Kelvyn Alp
The time for complacency is over. The Covid-19 vaccine debacle has exposed the callous disregard for human life by those in power. Not a single individual has been held accountable for the harm inflicted. The courts have colluded with the government, and the police have aided and abetted crimes against humanity.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry's revelations about decades-long child abuse in state and faith-based care have yielded nothing but empty promises. The inquiries themselves are a sham – money-laundering rackets for retired judges, lawyers, consultants, and other parasites. The victims remain ignored, forgotten, and marginalized.
This is not a matter of incompetence; it's a deliberate, systematic assault on our rights and freedoms. The system is designed to maintain the status quo, to keep the powerful in power, and to silence dissent.
We are at a crossroads. We can continue to succumb to the distractions, the race-baiting, and the divisiveness fabricated by the system. Or we can stand up, united, and demand justice.
The enemy is not the person next to you; it's the system that exploits and oppresses us all. It's the politicians who lie, the bureaucrats who cover up, and the corporate elites who profit from our suffering.
In 2026, we have a choice. We can continue to participate in this charade, or we can rise up and demand a new era of accountability. We can elect leaders who will genuinely represent us, or we can perpetuate the cycle of oppression.
The time for excuses is over. The time for action is now. We will either stand together and fight for our freedom, or we will surely fall, one by one, to the forces of oppression.
The choice is clear. The choice is yours.
https://nzloyal.com/justice/
https://nzloyal.com/health/
By Kelvyn Alp
The time for complacency is over. The Covid-19 vaccine debacle has exposed the callous disregard for human life by those in power. Not a single individual has been held accountable for the harm inflicted. The courts have colluded with the government, and the police have aided and abetted crimes against humanity.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry's revelations about decades-long child abuse in state and faith-based care have yielded nothing but empty promises. The inquiries themselves are a sham – money-laundering rackets for retired judges, lawyers, consultants, and other parasites. The victims remain ignored, forgotten, and marginalized.
This is not a matter of incompetence; it's a deliberate, systematic assault on our rights and freedoms. The system is designed to maintain the status quo, to keep the powerful in power, and to silence dissent.
We are at a crossroads. We can continue to succumb to the distractions, the race-baiting, and the divisiveness fabricated by the system. Or we can stand up, united, and demand justice.
The enemy is not the person next to you; it's the system that exploits and oppresses us all. It's the politicians who lie, the bureaucrats who cover up, and the corporate elites who profit from our suffering.
In 2026, we have a choice. We can continue to participate in this charade, or we can rise up and demand a new era of accountability. We can elect leaders who will genuinely represent us, or we can perpetuate the cycle of oppression.
The time for excuses is over. The time for action is now. We will either stand together and fight for our freedom, or we will surely fall, one by one, to the forces of oppression.
The choice is clear. The choice is yours.
https://nzloyal.com/justice/
https://nzloyal.com/health/
10.04.202506:10
A DISCUSSION THAT NEEDS TO BE HAD.
The controversy surrounding New Zealand Green MP Benjamin Doyle has sparked a heated debate about child safety, parental rights, and the role of activism in shaping societal norms. Doyle, who has faced backlash for his private social media posts, has been accused of promoting harmful and inappropriate content, particularly regarding his child.
Key Concerns:
- Child Safety: Doyle's posts have raised concerns about his child's well-being and potential risks associated with his parenting decisions.
- Parental Rights vs. Children's Rights: The debate highlights the tension between parents' rights to make decisions for their children and the need to protect children from potential harm.
- Activism and Mainstream Acceptance: Critics argue that the push for mainstream acceptance of trans activism may be compromising child safety and ignoring potential long-term consequences.
The Controversy Unfolds
Doyle's private Instagram account, "BibleBeltBussy," featured posts that included a photo of him with a child captioned "bussy galore." The term "bussy" has been interpreted as a slang word combining "boy" and a vulgar anatomical reference. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have questioned the appropriateness of Doyle's posts, with Luxon stating that they were "really inappropriate".
Reactions from the Green Party
Green Party co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson have defended Doyle, arguing that his posts were taken out of context and that the controversy stems from misinterpretation of language used within the queer community. However, some critics argue that the party's response has been inadequate and that they are prioritizing protecting Doyle over addressing concerns about child safety.
Balancing Personal Choice and Child Safety
The debate raises complex questions about balancing individual freedoms with the need to protect children. While adults should be free to make their own choices, children's safety and well-being must be prioritized. The conversation must consider the potential long-term consequences of parenting decisions and the role of activism in shaping societal norms.
Ultimately, the focus should be on ensuring that children are provided with a safe environment, free from life-changing decisions made by parents or activists. By prioritizing child safety and promoting nuanced discussions, a more balanced and compassionate society may result.
The personal choices and identities of consenting adults are their own business, and individuals should be free to identify as they see fit - whether that's as a man, woman, bi, trans, non-binary, or even something entirely unconventional - like a toaster.
However, when it comes to children, a different standard applies. Kids should be allowed to grow and develop without being influenced by adult ideologies or agendas, and they should be given the autonomy to make their own decisions when they reach adulthood. It's essential to prioritize children's well-being and agency, ensuring they're not pressured or coerced into making life-altering choices before they're capable of informed consent. By doing so, we create a society that values individual freedom while also protecting the vulnerable.
The controversy surrounding New Zealand Green MP Benjamin Doyle has sparked a heated debate about child safety, parental rights, and the role of activism in shaping societal norms. Doyle, who has faced backlash for his private social media posts, has been accused of promoting harmful and inappropriate content, particularly regarding his child.
Key Concerns:
- Child Safety: Doyle's posts have raised concerns about his child's well-being and potential risks associated with his parenting decisions.
- Parental Rights vs. Children's Rights: The debate highlights the tension between parents' rights to make decisions for their children and the need to protect children from potential harm.
- Activism and Mainstream Acceptance: Critics argue that the push for mainstream acceptance of trans activism may be compromising child safety and ignoring potential long-term consequences.
The Controversy Unfolds
Doyle's private Instagram account, "BibleBeltBussy," featured posts that included a photo of him with a child captioned "bussy galore." The term "bussy" has been interpreted as a slang word combining "boy" and a vulgar anatomical reference. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have questioned the appropriateness of Doyle's posts, with Luxon stating that they were "really inappropriate".
Reactions from the Green Party
Green Party co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson have defended Doyle, arguing that his posts were taken out of context and that the controversy stems from misinterpretation of language used within the queer community. However, some critics argue that the party's response has been inadequate and that they are prioritizing protecting Doyle over addressing concerns about child safety.
Balancing Personal Choice and Child Safety
The debate raises complex questions about balancing individual freedoms with the need to protect children. While adults should be free to make their own choices, children's safety and well-being must be prioritized. The conversation must consider the potential long-term consequences of parenting decisions and the role of activism in shaping societal norms.
Ultimately, the focus should be on ensuring that children are provided with a safe environment, free from life-changing decisions made by parents or activists. By prioritizing child safety and promoting nuanced discussions, a more balanced and compassionate society may result.
The personal choices and identities of consenting adults are their own business, and individuals should be free to identify as they see fit - whether that's as a man, woman, bi, trans, non-binary, or even something entirely unconventional - like a toaster.
However, when it comes to children, a different standard applies. Kids should be allowed to grow and develop without being influenced by adult ideologies or agendas, and they should be given the autonomy to make their own decisions when they reach adulthood. It's essential to prioritize children's well-being and agency, ensuring they're not pressured or coerced into making life-altering choices before they're capable of informed consent. By doing so, we create a society that values individual freedom while also protecting the vulnerable.
30.03.202505:08
If Viruses Do Not Exist As Claimed, What Are Vaccines For?
By Kelvyn Alp
The notion that viruses are the primary cause of many diseases has been a cornerstone of modern medicine for over a century. However, a growing body of research suggests that this paradigm may be fundamentally flawed. Dr. Mark Bailey's seminal paper, "A Farewell to Virology," (2022) and the work of Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, have collectively challenged the conventional wisdom on viruses and vaccines.
Their research posits that viruses do not exist as disease-causing entities, but rather as misidentified cellular components and other biological phenomena. This idea is not new and builds on the pioneering work of former virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka and The Perth Group. However, it has gained significant traction in recent years, largely because of the COVID-19 scamdemic. The implications of this theory are profound, and they raise a crucial question: if viruses do not exist as claimed, what are we vaccinating against?
The vaccine schedules that govern our lives are based on the assumption that viruses are real and pose a significant threat to public health. However, if this assumption is incorrect, then the justification for vaccines crumbles. Are we simply creating a future dependent clientele for pharmaceutical companies?
Proponents of the conventional virology paradigm often dismiss these ideas as "pseudoscience" or "conspiracy theories." However, a closer examination of the evidence reveals that the criticisms leveled against the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan are largely unfounded. These doctors have pointed out that an experiment should adhere to the scientific method and show the "virus" as an independent variable. As it stands, the virology literature has fallen short on this basic requirement.
One common criticism is that these researchers are not "experts" in the field of virology. However, this argument is easily countered by pointing out that the very notion of virology is being challenged. Who better to challenge the status quo than those who have dedicated themselves to understanding the underlying biology? Furthermore, Dr. Lanka was a virologist in the 1990s but abandoned the profession when he realised the methods were pseudoscientific.
Another criticism is that the idea that viruses don't exist is "unproven." However, this argument ignores the fact that the burden of proof lies with those who claim that viruses do exist. The onus is on the scientific community to provide empirical evidence for the existence of viruses, rather than relying on assumptions and establishment dogma.
The fact that no credible expert has challenged or refuted the findings of the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan speaks volumes. It suggests that the conventional virology paradigm is built on shaky ground and that the idea that viruses do not exist is not only plausible but also worthy of serious consideration.
So, what are we vaccinating against? Is it a real, tangible threat, or is it a phantom menace created to justify a lucrative industry? The answer to this question has far-reaching implications for public health, the pharmaceutical industry, and our understanding of the human body. Ask yourself: "who benefits the most from upholding the virus model?"
We invite you to explore this topic further, to question the assumptions that underlie our vaccine schedules, and to seek out the evidence for yourself. The truth is out there, waiting to be uncovered.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
https://nzloyal.com/health/
By Kelvyn Alp
The notion that viruses are the primary cause of many diseases has been a cornerstone of modern medicine for over a century. However, a growing body of research suggests that this paradigm may be fundamentally flawed. Dr. Mark Bailey's seminal paper, "A Farewell to Virology," (2022) and the work of Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, have collectively challenged the conventional wisdom on viruses and vaccines.
Their research posits that viruses do not exist as disease-causing entities, but rather as misidentified cellular components and other biological phenomena. This idea is not new and builds on the pioneering work of former virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka and The Perth Group. However, it has gained significant traction in recent years, largely because of the COVID-19 scamdemic. The implications of this theory are profound, and they raise a crucial question: if viruses do not exist as claimed, what are we vaccinating against?
The vaccine schedules that govern our lives are based on the assumption that viruses are real and pose a significant threat to public health. However, if this assumption is incorrect, then the justification for vaccines crumbles. Are we simply creating a future dependent clientele for pharmaceutical companies?
Proponents of the conventional virology paradigm often dismiss these ideas as "pseudoscience" or "conspiracy theories." However, a closer examination of the evidence reveals that the criticisms leveled against the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan are largely unfounded. These doctors have pointed out that an experiment should adhere to the scientific method and show the "virus" as an independent variable. As it stands, the virology literature has fallen short on this basic requirement.
One common criticism is that these researchers are not "experts" in the field of virology. However, this argument is easily countered by pointing out that the very notion of virology is being challenged. Who better to challenge the status quo than those who have dedicated themselves to understanding the underlying biology? Furthermore, Dr. Lanka was a virologist in the 1990s but abandoned the profession when he realised the methods were pseudoscientific.
Another criticism is that the idea that viruses don't exist is "unproven." However, this argument ignores the fact that the burden of proof lies with those who claim that viruses do exist. The onus is on the scientific community to provide empirical evidence for the existence of viruses, rather than relying on assumptions and establishment dogma.
The fact that no credible expert has challenged or refuted the findings of the Baileys, Kaufman, and Cowan speaks volumes. It suggests that the conventional virology paradigm is built on shaky ground and that the idea that viruses do not exist is not only plausible but also worthy of serious consideration.
So, what are we vaccinating against? Is it a real, tangible threat, or is it a phantom menace created to justify a lucrative industry? The answer to this question has far-reaching implications for public health, the pharmaceutical industry, and our understanding of the human body. Ask yourself: "who benefits the most from upholding the virus model?"
We invite you to explore this topic further, to question the assumptions that underlie our vaccine schedules, and to seek out the evidence for yourself. The truth is out there, waiting to be uncovered.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
https://nzloyal.com/health/
27.03.202503:27
Speaking Truth to Power: The Unlawful 1986 Constitution Act and New Zealand's Illegitimate Government
By Kelvyn Alp
As I examine the New Zealand government's consideration of extending the parliamentary term from three to four years, I am compelled to speak out against this move. The 1986 Constitution Act, which established the current parliamentary system, was passed without proper consultation or input from the people, effectively disenfranchising them from the decision-making process.
I firmly believe that this move was a clear overstepping of convention, as the government failed to follow the established precedent of holding a referendum to alter the constitution. Instead, they relied on the obscure and rarely used Section 268 of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, which allowed for the amendment of the Constitution Act without a referendum.
In my research, I have found that the 1986 Constitution Act is, in fact, illegal. The Act was enacted by a process that was not authorized by any prior enactment, and therefore, the whole of the Act is invalid. This renders the government's consideration of extending the parliamentary term as a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process.
Furthermore, I believe that the Governor-General's role in signing the Act into law was merely ceremonial, serving only as a rubber stamp for parliamentary decisions, rather than providing any meaningful checks and balances on power. This undermines the principles of representative democracy and reinforces the illegitimate nature of the government.
In light of this evidence, I firmly believe that the New Zealand government has been operating without legitimacy since the enactment of the 1986 Constitution Act. Their consideration of extending the parliamentary term is a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process. I urge the government to address the underlying issues of illegitimacy and work towards establishing a more genuine and representative democracy, along the lines of a constitutional republic.
https://nzloyal.com/?s=Justice
By Kelvyn Alp
As I examine the New Zealand government's consideration of extending the parliamentary term from three to four years, I am compelled to speak out against this move. The 1986 Constitution Act, which established the current parliamentary system, was passed without proper consultation or input from the people, effectively disenfranchising them from the decision-making process.
I firmly believe that this move was a clear overstepping of convention, as the government failed to follow the established precedent of holding a referendum to alter the constitution. Instead, they relied on the obscure and rarely used Section 268 of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, which allowed for the amendment of the Constitution Act without a referendum.
In my research, I have found that the 1986 Constitution Act is, in fact, illegal. The Act was enacted by a process that was not authorized by any prior enactment, and therefore, the whole of the Act is invalid. This renders the government's consideration of extending the parliamentary term as a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process.
Furthermore, I believe that the Governor-General's role in signing the Act into law was merely ceremonial, serving only as a rubber stamp for parliamentary decisions, rather than providing any meaningful checks and balances on power. This undermines the principles of representative democracy and reinforces the illegitimate nature of the government.
In light of this evidence, I firmly believe that the New Zealand government has been operating without legitimacy since the enactment of the 1986 Constitution Act. Their consideration of extending the parliamentary term is a further attempt to consolidate power and undermine the democratic process. I urge the government to address the underlying issues of illegitimacy and work towards establishing a more genuine and representative democracy, along the lines of a constitutional republic.
https://nzloyal.com/?s=Justice
17.04.202506:49
WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF ISRAEL - EPISODE 9: TULSI GABBARD
https://rumble.com/v6s7bfp-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-9-tulsi-gabbard.html
Episode 9 in the multi-part series by Pariah Media's Samantha Costello.
Tulsi Gabbard; unscrupulous... or an operative in the White House?
Unpacking the Trump Cabinet: A Web of Influence and Deceit?
Join us for a multi-part series as we delve into the intriguing world of President Donald J. Trump's cabinet picks and key associates. With a roster of billionaires, CEOs, and politicians, Trump's inner circle raises more questions than answers. What drives these appointments? Is it a quest for public service or a strategic play towards a scripted biblical outcome?
As we explore the backgrounds and connections of Trump's team, we'll examine the eerie parallels between his rise to power and the infamous Operation Trust, a historical deception that manipulated public perception. Could the "saviour president" narrative be another cleverly crafted illusion?
In this series, we'll scrutinize the cast of characters surrounding Trump.
As we navigate the complex web of alliances and interests, we'll seek to uncover the truth behind Trump's cabinet selections. Join us on this journey as we separate facts from fiction and shed light on the forces shaping America's future.
Episode 1: Introduction and JD Vance
https://rumble.com/v6ipysp-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-part-1-introduction-and-jd-vance.html
Episode 2: Howard Lutnick, Jared Kushner, and Charles Kushner
https://rumble.com/v6jtkum-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-2-howard-lutnick-jarad-kushner-and-char.html
Episode 3: Vivek Ramaswamy, Russell Vought, and DOGE;
https://rumble.com/v6lefly-episode-3-vivek-ramaswamy-russell-vought-and-the-department-of-government-e.html
Episode 4: Project Stargate, the Techno-Gulag, and Bilderberg:
https://rumble.com/v6o7qxx-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-4-project-stargate-bilderber.html
Episode 5: Anna Paulina Luna, and the Removal of IGs and Military Heads:
https://rumble.com/v6pvpju-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-e5-anna-paulina-luna-and-the-removal.html
Episode 6: Susie Wiles, and Pam Bondi
https://rumble.com/v6q3l46-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-6-susie-wiles-and-pam-bondi.html
Episode 7: Pete Hegseth
https://rumble.com/v6qevcg-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-7-pete-hegseth.html
Episode 8: Marco Rubio and the Martyrs
https://rumble.com/v6r7wty-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-8-marco-rubio.html
https://rumble.com/v6s7bfp-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-9-tulsi-gabbard.html
Episode 9 in the multi-part series by Pariah Media's Samantha Costello.
Tulsi Gabbard; unscrupulous... or an operative in the White House?
Unpacking the Trump Cabinet: A Web of Influence and Deceit?
Join us for a multi-part series as we delve into the intriguing world of President Donald J. Trump's cabinet picks and key associates. With a roster of billionaires, CEOs, and politicians, Trump's inner circle raises more questions than answers. What drives these appointments? Is it a quest for public service or a strategic play towards a scripted biblical outcome?
As we explore the backgrounds and connections of Trump's team, we'll examine the eerie parallels between his rise to power and the infamous Operation Trust, a historical deception that manipulated public perception. Could the "saviour president" narrative be another cleverly crafted illusion?
In this series, we'll scrutinize the cast of characters surrounding Trump.
As we navigate the complex web of alliances and interests, we'll seek to uncover the truth behind Trump's cabinet selections. Join us on this journey as we separate facts from fiction and shed light on the forces shaping America's future.
Episode 1: Introduction and JD Vance
https://rumble.com/v6ipysp-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-part-1-introduction-and-jd-vance.html
Episode 2: Howard Lutnick, Jared Kushner, and Charles Kushner
https://rumble.com/v6jtkum-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-2-howard-lutnick-jarad-kushner-and-char.html
Episode 3: Vivek Ramaswamy, Russell Vought, and DOGE;
https://rumble.com/v6lefly-episode-3-vivek-ramaswamy-russell-vought-and-the-department-of-government-e.html
Episode 4: Project Stargate, the Techno-Gulag, and Bilderberg:
https://rumble.com/v6o7qxx-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-4-project-stargate-bilderber.html
Episode 5: Anna Paulina Luna, and the Removal of IGs and Military Heads:
https://rumble.com/v6pvpju-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-e5-anna-paulina-luna-and-the-removal.html
Episode 6: Susie Wiles, and Pam Bondi
https://rumble.com/v6q3l46-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-6-susie-wiles-and-pam-bondi.html
Episode 7: Pete Hegseth
https://rumble.com/v6qevcg-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-7-pete-hegseth.html
Episode 8: Marco Rubio and the Martyrs
https://rumble.com/v6r7wty-welcome-to-the-united-states-of-israel-episode-8-marco-rubio.html
История изменений канала
Войдите, чтобы разблокировать больше функциональности.