
Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Siberian Tigers
Outlook on things from the depths of Russia
TGlist рейтинг
0
0
ТипАчык
Текшерүү
ТекшерилбегенИшенимдүүлүк
ИшенимсизОрдуРосія
ТилиБашка
Канал түзүлгөн датаNov 05, 2021
TGlistке кошулган дата
Feb 09, 2025Тиркелген топ

Siberian Tigers. Debate.
15
Рекорддор
13.02.202523:59
287Катталгандар19.11.202423:59
0Цитация индекси20.11.202423:59
5801 посттун көрүүлөрү05.03.202522:10
461 жарнама посттун көрүүлөрү05.02.202507:29
16.13%ER15.02.202523:59
103.83%ERRӨнүгүү
Катталуучулар
Citation индекси
Бир посттун көрүүсү
Жарнамалык посттун көрүүсү
ER
ERR
29.03.202511:24
"Russia's new political argument in the discussion on Ukraine: neo-Nazis do not obey Zelensky.
Two examples of this argument in two days
1. Putin said that the influence of Azov neo-Nazis is growing, two corps are currently being formed from them. And in the future, they will be so strong that they will not obey the Ukrainian authorities and will not observe the ceasefire. And that is why a reboot of the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government is needed. And that is why external control is needed for the elections in Ukraine.
2. Peskov said a day later that Russia could withdraw from the ceasefire on strikes on the energy sector, because many units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are not following the order of the Ukrainian president not to strike on the energy sector.
3. That is, it turns out that Russia emphasizes that Zelensky already does not completely control part of the military. And in the future, he will control even less.
4. Apparently, in the near future, based on this, Russia will make some strong political conclusion. And now we see preparations for this conclusion.
5. It turned out surprisingly that if Zelensky was previously blamed for everything, now It turns out that Zelensky is trying to make a truce, but the neo-Nazis are not letting him do it"
From TG channel Markov's logic
Two examples of this argument in two days
1. Putin said that the influence of Azov neo-Nazis is growing, two corps are currently being formed from them. And in the future, they will be so strong that they will not obey the Ukrainian authorities and will not observe the ceasefire. And that is why a reboot of the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government is needed. And that is why external control is needed for the elections in Ukraine.
2. Peskov said a day later that Russia could withdraw from the ceasefire on strikes on the energy sector, because many units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are not following the order of the Ukrainian president not to strike on the energy sector.
3. That is, it turns out that Russia emphasizes that Zelensky already does not completely control part of the military. And in the future, he will control even less.
4. Apparently, in the near future, based on this, Russia will make some strong political conclusion. And now we see preparations for this conclusion.
5. It turned out surprisingly that if Zelensky was previously blamed for everything, now It turns out that Zelensky is trying to make a truce, but the neo-Nazis are not letting him do it"
From TG channel Markov's logic
25.03.202518:52
"What we learned after the new meeting between Russia and the US in Saudi Arabia: what matters is not what the media writes.
Formally, the meeting was indeed technical: in fact, it is not surprising that Russia did not want to issue any statements at all, but did so after the White House report. There are few specifics, and it is obvious that this is not all that was discussed over the course of 12 hours.
So far, we have received an agreement on a ceasefire in the Black Sea and a gradual resumption of freedom of navigation there on all sides, subject to the lifting of sanctions from Rosselkhozbank [one of the Russian main banks linked to state agriculture] and its connection to SWIFT, as well as a promise from the US to help Russia return to the global food and fertilizer market. Russia also emphasized that peace initiatives will only come after the sanctions are lifted. This is a substantive, positive result, but far from the main one so far.
In my opinion, something else is important: in fact, a change in the modality of relations in the US-Russia-Ukraine triangle. Zelensky is gradually moving away from all his initial demands: not only there's no talk about moving back Russian army to the borders of 1991 or even 2022. Even the canonical "no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine" has been forgotten. As Simon Schuster wrote in his long article about Zelensky, his maximum program is now, in essence, to convince Trump that Putin is not as good as Trump himself thinks.
Ukraine has been largely put in the role of an object of negotiations: the US negotiates with Russia, and then conveys the results to Ukraine, sometimes taking into account Kiev's counter-wishes. Russia conducts a direct dialogue with the US regarding Ukraine and the security system in Europe: in fact, this is what Putin has been striving for from the very beginning, and this is what now makes us believe that peace is truly possible"
Alexey Naumov
Formally, the meeting was indeed technical: in fact, it is not surprising that Russia did not want to issue any statements at all, but did so after the White House report. There are few specifics, and it is obvious that this is not all that was discussed over the course of 12 hours.
So far, we have received an agreement on a ceasefire in the Black Sea and a gradual resumption of freedom of navigation there on all sides, subject to the lifting of sanctions from Rosselkhozbank [one of the Russian main banks linked to state agriculture] and its connection to SWIFT, as well as a promise from the US to help Russia return to the global food and fertilizer market. Russia also emphasized that peace initiatives will only come after the sanctions are lifted. This is a substantive, positive result, but far from the main one so far.
In my opinion, something else is important: in fact, a change in the modality of relations in the US-Russia-Ukraine triangle. Zelensky is gradually moving away from all his initial demands: not only there's no talk about moving back Russian army to the borders of 1991 or even 2022. Even the canonical "no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine" has been forgotten. As Simon Schuster wrote in his long article about Zelensky, his maximum program is now, in essence, to convince Trump that Putin is not as good as Trump himself thinks.
Ukraine has been largely put in the role of an object of negotiations: the US negotiates with Russia, and then conveys the results to Ukraine, sometimes taking into account Kiev's counter-wishes. Russia conducts a direct dialogue with the US regarding Ukraine and the security system in Europe: in fact, this is what Putin has been striving for from the very beginning, and this is what now makes us believe that peace is truly possible"
Alexey Naumov
25.03.202506:25
"I came across some discussions about what drones and the gamification of war do to the human psyche. In fact, this was discussed long before the widespread use of cheap military drones as a result of who knows what. For example, there is a book "The Theory of the Drone" by the French philosopher Gregory Chamayou - it is not about today's drones, but also about the massive American "Predators" that hovered in the skies over the Middle East. There are many interesting observations - for example, how the advent of drones expanded the functions of Bentham's panopticon from "the warden can watch you" to "the digital warden is always watching" (the same can be said about the video surveillance system).
In general, it seems to me that the experience of war can be divided into three main parts. War, which existed from the beginning of time until about the beginning of the last century, involves close contact with the enemy. Close combat means danger: you can kill the enemy, the enemy can kill you. The need to put your own life on the line is a kind of the price for the opportunity to take someone else's life. It is clear that military art has always sought to destroy the enemy with the least danger to oneself, but this danger has never become zero. Ancient horse archers or dragoons of the Modern Era, who had the ability to run from enemy infantry, were still close and bore certain risks.
The advent of long-range artillery revolutionized not only military affairs, but also psychology. People appeared who were relatively safe behind the front line, but at the same time brought death to others (most of the losses in the First World War were due to artillery). However, they were not in close contact with the enemy, fired at designated points and usually did not see the result of their work with their own eyes. That is, they had no experience of danger, but also no experience of killing.
Drones made a new revolution in the psychology of military affairs. Already the American "Predator" allowed you to see quite closely those you would hit with a missile. Modern kamikaze drones provide even closer contact. At the same time, the drone operator, like an artilleryman, is far outside the action zone. That is, the drone operator is a person who experiences the close experience of killing an enemy, like an ancient soldier. But at the same time, he is relatively safe and does not experience the risk that in the old days served as a counterweight"
From the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD
In general, it seems to me that the experience of war can be divided into three main parts. War, which existed from the beginning of time until about the beginning of the last century, involves close contact with the enemy. Close combat means danger: you can kill the enemy, the enemy can kill you. The need to put your own life on the line is a kind of the price for the opportunity to take someone else's life. It is clear that military art has always sought to destroy the enemy with the least danger to oneself, but this danger has never become zero. Ancient horse archers or dragoons of the Modern Era, who had the ability to run from enemy infantry, were still close and bore certain risks.
The advent of long-range artillery revolutionized not only military affairs, but also psychology. People appeared who were relatively safe behind the front line, but at the same time brought death to others (most of the losses in the First World War were due to artillery). However, they were not in close contact with the enemy, fired at designated points and usually did not see the result of their work with their own eyes. That is, they had no experience of danger, but also no experience of killing.
Drones made a new revolution in the psychology of military affairs. Already the American "Predator" allowed you to see quite closely those you would hit with a missile. Modern kamikaze drones provide even closer contact. At the same time, the drone operator, like an artilleryman, is far outside the action zone. That is, the drone operator is a person who experiences the close experience of killing an enemy, like an ancient soldier. But at the same time, he is relatively safe and does not experience the risk that in the old days served as a counterweight"
From the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD
03.04.202512:18
"Trump's tariff decision is primarily political.
The free trade regime promoted by America meant the following: Washington tolerated an unfavorable trade balance for itself, allowing other countries to profit from mutual trade. In exchange for this, states followed the political course of the United States.
That is, it is a kind of tax on greatness, which American workers regularly paid, experiencing the closure of factories, the extinction of the cities of the "Rust Belt" and the collapse of the life foundations of entire generations of hereditary factory workers. It was they who, in many ways, brought Trump to power.
This old mode of interaction with the world is alien to him: besides, yesterday's vassals no longer follow Washington's new course. Trump is transferring interaction with other countries to cynical market rails, counting on using American economic power to earn even more.
He believes that before the next election, the economic situation, having faced a short-term shock, will improve, and that wealthier American workers will not only resurrect the country's industry, but will also keep the Republicans in power for many years"
Alexey Naumov
The free trade regime promoted by America meant the following: Washington tolerated an unfavorable trade balance for itself, allowing other countries to profit from mutual trade. In exchange for this, states followed the political course of the United States.
That is, it is a kind of tax on greatness, which American workers regularly paid, experiencing the closure of factories, the extinction of the cities of the "Rust Belt" and the collapse of the life foundations of entire generations of hereditary factory workers. It was they who, in many ways, brought Trump to power.
This old mode of interaction with the world is alien to him: besides, yesterday's vassals no longer follow Washington's new course. Trump is transferring interaction with other countries to cynical market rails, counting on using American economic power to earn even more.
He believes that before the next election, the economic situation, having faced a short-term shock, will improve, and that wealthier American workers will not only resurrect the country's industry, but will also keep the Republicans in power for many years"
Alexey Naumov


28.03.202510:09
"In Vilnius [the capital of Lithuania, a former Soviet republic], they are "decommunizing" sewer manholes. The process has been going on for more than 12 years and is still not close to completion
The city authorities continue the campaign to remove Soviet inscriptions and symbols from various city infrastructure objects as part of the decommunization policy.
Initially, utility workers promised to remove all the inscriptions more than 12 years ago, by May 1, 2013, but the process turned out to be so difficult for local housing and utilities services that the removal is still ongoing. According to Radior, there are still about 130,000 "Soviet manholes" left in the capital of Lithuania [hell, isn't that huge?]. Residents of the city are even encouraged to report such manholes to the appropriate authorities.
Since 2008, Lithuania has had a ban on the display of Soviet symbols, which applies to rallies, mass events, and everyday situations"
By SVTV
Removing Soviet things? No. Removing Soviet signs? Yes!
The city authorities continue the campaign to remove Soviet inscriptions and symbols from various city infrastructure objects as part of the decommunization policy.
Initially, utility workers promised to remove all the inscriptions more than 12 years ago, by May 1, 2013, but the process turned out to be so difficult for local housing and utilities services that the removal is still ongoing. According to Radior, there are still about 130,000 "Soviet manholes" left in the capital of Lithuania [hell, isn't that huge?]. Residents of the city are even encouraged to report such manholes to the appropriate authorities.
Since 2008, Lithuania has had a ban on the display of Soviet symbols, which applies to rallies, mass events, and everyday situations"
By SVTV
Removing Soviet things? No. Removing Soviet signs? Yes!
03.04.202515:19
In case you like death metal. First 3 minutes is pure annihilation
https://youtu.be/5Zdg4Sbefg4?si=aMNxdSIFt-gPXbKZ
https://youtu.be/5Zdg4Sbefg4?si=aMNxdSIFt-gPXbKZ


03.04.202511:54
Well, that's still not the dumbest possible political decision


02.04.202515:26
I've already written that the median salary in Moscow is 80 000 rubles per month. Now look at that billboard from KFC, I took it not long ago. It says, you can earn "до 80 000 р" which is "up to 80 000 rubles". After the employment they probably tell their slaves workers that they're going to earn about 50 000. And 80 000 is achieavable only if you take extra hours, because there's this "up to" written before 80 000. Thus, what these KFC bitches are offering is misleading, though you can't actually call it a fraud
01.04.202507:17
One of my female colleagues stopped visiting a local shooting range after the war began. She says, she hasn't been to the shooting range ever since February, 2022 because she now feels bad about touching weapons
It's interesting how sensitive some people are
It's interesting how sensitive some people are
29.03.202516:09
Funniest shit I've seen in a month
https://youtu.be/m0i8IBZklZg?si=mS_DXHPMnZztN-CM
https://youtu.be/m0i8IBZklZg?si=mS_DXHPMnZztN-CM
28.03.202506:43
"The new US deal on Ukraine's resources (if the information in the press about Washington's desire to control almost all mineral countries is confirmed) is certainly colonization in a beautiful wrapper.
But who said that colonization does not provide security? The British Empire, pumping resources out of India, protected it from foreign pretenders.
Trump, who thinks according to the current patterns of the 19th century, knows this very well. "You want security? Well, that suits us just fine"* - that's what he seems to be telling Ukraine.
No one promised sovereignty: but in the logic of the same 19th century, sovereignty must be earned, and today only a few states have it. Ukraine, like any state bordering a great power, is not among them"
By Alexey Naumov
*Here Naumov makes a reference to a Putin's speech in the beginning of the war. The thing is, among many (though, let's be fair, not all) Ukrainians during USSR there was a huge hate towards the communists, for various reasons. You may hate commies for whatever you want but the fact is, communists built about 99% of Ukrainian universities, schools, hospitals, kindergartens, power plants, railroad stations. So, in February 2022 Putin said the following: "You want decommunization? Well, that suits us just fine", hinting that from now on Russian army will be destroying power plants and other objects of infrastructure of Ukraine, which were given to Ukrainians by communists and which Ukrainians took for granted
But who said that colonization does not provide security? The British Empire, pumping resources out of India, protected it from foreign pretenders.
Trump, who thinks according to the current patterns of the 19th century, knows this very well. "You want security? Well, that suits us just fine"* - that's what he seems to be telling Ukraine.
No one promised sovereignty: but in the logic of the same 19th century, sovereignty must be earned, and today only a few states have it. Ukraine, like any state bordering a great power, is not among them"
By Alexey Naumov
*Here Naumov makes a reference to a Putin's speech in the beginning of the war. The thing is, among many (though, let's be fair, not all) Ukrainians during USSR there was a huge hate towards the communists, for various reasons. You may hate commies for whatever you want but the fact is, communists built about 99% of Ukrainian universities, schools, hospitals, kindergartens, power plants, railroad stations. So, in February 2022 Putin said the following: "You want decommunization? Well, that suits us just fine", hinting that from now on Russian army will be destroying power plants and other objects of infrastructure of Ukraine, which were given to Ukrainians by communists and which Ukrainians took for granted
Көбүрөөк функцияларды ачуу үчүн кириңиз.