DS
DE's nuts app banned aphorism stand
Hand crafted artisanal smart assery for poor unfortunate apple users.
TGlist рейтинг
0
0
ТипАчык
Текшерүү
ТекшерилбегенИшенимдүүлүк
ИшенимсизОрду
ТилиБашка
Канал түзүлгөн датаЛист 27, 2022
TGlistке кошулган дата
Лип 04, 2024Рекорддор
16.05.202523:59
542Катталгандар28.06.202423:59
0Цитация индекси11.10.202423:59
4.5K1 посттун көрүүлөрү11.10.202423:59
4.5K1 жарнама посттун көрүүлөрү01.04.202514:30
18.37%ER12.10.202423:59
1037.10%ERRӨнүгүү
Катталуучулар
Citation индекси
Бир посттун көрүүсү
Жарнамалык посттун көрүүсү
ER
ERR
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
🪙 THE FERRYMAN'S TOLL 🪙
06.05.202504:07
Never thought I'd die fighting side by side with a Daily Wire Employee.
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
Smoke Pit V
10.05.202505:48
A troop of North American pavement apes attempt to intimidate a playground full of White families. If you are waiting for the signal to take things seriously, this is it.
Get fit, train, and build your tribe because this is happening.
Get fit, train, and build your tribe because this is happening.
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
The Fundamental Principle
04.05.202522:19
Shiloh Hendricks was rewarded for speaking the truth and engaging in reality. I hope she becomes a millionaire; I hope she never has to worry about material needs ever again. I said this because people should be brave enough to speak the truth. I appreciate all of those who put their names and faces out there for our cause, and I appreciate all of the anons that do not. The road to Heaven is a narrow one, and we cannot begin it without seeking the Truth, but we cannot get to Heaven alone, nor can we win this struggle for our race alone. The 21st century is the era we must find out who is and who is not like us. My people are not afraid to blaspheme the modern religion. My people say nigger.
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
Synagogue of Satan Pilled 2 ///
11.05.202521:02
Happy Mother's Day!
Adolf Hitler, Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ, 1913
Adolf Hitler, Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ, 1913
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
American Reform
06.05.202516:17
Ethnic Jews who have converted to Catholicism ought to refrain from speaking publicly on political matters, particularly when it comes to issues like immigration, national identity and economics. As a rule, barring some extraordinary exceptions, this should be enforced by Catholics, gently at first, then vigorously.
This can be proven in several ways, but common sense, practical experience and a working-knowledge of history are sufficient. For one, the unique racial character and disposition of the Jew is not immediately vitiated by his conversion and baptism. For two thousand years he has considered himself apart, certainly distinct from the gentiles and often above them. Assimilation in his host country, for him, means ethnic extinction and a renunciation of his special status, as chosen by God. There is a real tension in his person since he knows that, after the coming of Christ, the faithful Christian nations, no longer the Jews, are the chosen people. Yet it is hard for him to detach from his ethnic baggage, so-to-speak. It is not natural for that to happen immediately, and we ought not to be surprised when it, invariably, does not.
As Fr. Raffaele Ballerini, editor of La Civiltá Cattolica, observed in 1897, “The Jew always continues to be immutably Jewish in every place. His nationality is not in the soil where he was born, it is not in the language he speaks; it is in the seed, in the lineage and in that mixture of Bible, Talmud and Kabbalah, which he calls his history and his religion […] Everywhere he is a stranger to all, except those with whom he shares his origin and curse. Outside of his own interest, he has no other political aim, wherever he lives.”
In all of this, Catholics must not lose sight of the truth that we must presume sincerity on the part of the convert, whether he is an ethnic Jew or ethnic gentile. Charity and the Church demand that. However, we must not error into credulity, which is decidedly not a virtue. Presumption must give way to facts, to observable objective intentions, even if they are for ill—no, especially if they are for ill. The common good is at stake. Catholicism informs political thinking—that is, if the convert is sincere—but it takes time, particularly for the true outsider, the ethnic Jew.
Finally, a warning of St. Thomas, while not directly related to this issue of Jewish converts involving themselves in domestic politics, ought not to go unheeded. This principle, surely, can apply here, “[I]f foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers would occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people.” (ST I-II, q. 105, a.3)
This can be proven in several ways, but common sense, practical experience and a working-knowledge of history are sufficient. For one, the unique racial character and disposition of the Jew is not immediately vitiated by his conversion and baptism. For two thousand years he has considered himself apart, certainly distinct from the gentiles and often above them. Assimilation in his host country, for him, means ethnic extinction and a renunciation of his special status, as chosen by God. There is a real tension in his person since he knows that, after the coming of Christ, the faithful Christian nations, no longer the Jews, are the chosen people. Yet it is hard for him to detach from his ethnic baggage, so-to-speak. It is not natural for that to happen immediately, and we ought not to be surprised when it, invariably, does not.
As Fr. Raffaele Ballerini, editor of La Civiltá Cattolica, observed in 1897, “The Jew always continues to be immutably Jewish in every place. His nationality is not in the soil where he was born, it is not in the language he speaks; it is in the seed, in the lineage and in that mixture of Bible, Talmud and Kabbalah, which he calls his history and his religion […] Everywhere he is a stranger to all, except those with whom he shares his origin and curse. Outside of his own interest, he has no other political aim, wherever he lives.”
In all of this, Catholics must not lose sight of the truth that we must presume sincerity on the part of the convert, whether he is an ethnic Jew or ethnic gentile. Charity and the Church demand that. However, we must not error into credulity, which is decidedly not a virtue. Presumption must give way to facts, to observable objective intentions, even if they are for ill—no, especially if they are for ill. The common good is at stake. Catholicism informs political thinking—that is, if the convert is sincere—but it takes time, particularly for the true outsider, the ethnic Jew.
Finally, a warning of St. Thomas, while not directly related to this issue of Jewish converts involving themselves in domestic politics, ought not to go unheeded. This principle, surely, can apply here, “[I]f foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers would occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people.” (ST I-II, q. 105, a.3)
Кайра бөлүшүлгөн:
Tollahgram
04.05.202517:18
Stating the bleeding obvious here, but worth pointing out when talking to this about people who aren't us...
Let's think about a few of the biggest racial cause celebres in America. Here are a few of the top of my head:
Rodney King
Trayvon Martin
Michael Brown
Ahmaud Arbery
George Floyd
Jordan Neely (killed by Daniel Penny)
Kamelo Anthony (murdered Austin Metcalfe)
Shiloh Hendrix
What does every single one of those have in common?
Every single one of them was caused by criminality, antisocial behaviour, violence, looking for opportunities to steal, or simply failing to abide by rules on the part of a black.
Rodney King - driving like a lunatic, chased by police cars, then violently resisted arrest
Trayvon Martin - clearly looking for places or people to rob, violently resisted scrutiny
Michael Brown - had just violently robbed a convenience store, then violently assaulted a police officer who sought to apprehend him for it
Ahmaud Arbery - clearly looking for places or people to rob, then charged at a men wielding a legally-owned firearm when challenged
Goerge Floyd - used counterfeit money in a shop, off his head on drugs, then resisted arrest
Jordan Neely - long history of threatening and antisocial behaviour on the New York City Subway system, and was threatening to kill women and children when Daniel Penny subdued him
Kamelo Anthony - responded to being told he was sitting in the wrong place with aggression, and ultimately stabbed a White boy to death
Shiloh Hendrix - White woman who *checks notes* used an epithet that blacks find offensive after a black child tried to steal from her and her child.
There are countless more examples like this. These are just off the top of my head. But these examples and pretty much any other anyone could name all begin with blacks failing to abide by civilised standards, behaving in an aggressive and antisocial way, committing crimes, seeking to commit crimes, or trying to injure and kill people.
Doesn't matter how many decent, orderly people of Sub-Saharan African origins you or I know or have known. I've known a fair number, and some I had a lot of time for. But that does not matter. On a large scale, there is just not a single valid reason why you would want these people in general anywhere near our people or our societies.
Not one.
The same applies to pretty much every other foreign racial group to varying degrees.
The only reason anyone would want large numbers of them in White countries is if they meant us harm, wanted our homelands destroyed, and potentially, wanted our race exterminated.
There isn't a single thing any group of non-Whites can do that we cannot do ourselves and that we cannot survive or thrive without, which justifies the permanent, large-scale presence of any of them in our countries. Not a single thing.
It just so happens that Sub-Saharan Africans are probably the starkest example of this, simply because of the astonishingly high rates at which so many of them simply cannot or will not abide by the most basic rules, laws, morals, and standards of behaviour. People from most of the Islamic world run them very close for some similar reasons, and some different reasons.
Let's think about a few of the biggest racial cause celebres in America. Here are a few of the top of my head:
Rodney King
Trayvon Martin
Michael Brown
Ahmaud Arbery
George Floyd
Jordan Neely (killed by Daniel Penny)
Kamelo Anthony (murdered Austin Metcalfe)
Shiloh Hendrix
What does every single one of those have in common?
Every single one of them was caused by criminality, antisocial behaviour, violence, looking for opportunities to steal, or simply failing to abide by rules on the part of a black.
Rodney King - driving like a lunatic, chased by police cars, then violently resisted arrest
Trayvon Martin - clearly looking for places or people to rob, violently resisted scrutiny
Michael Brown - had just violently robbed a convenience store, then violently assaulted a police officer who sought to apprehend him for it
Ahmaud Arbery - clearly looking for places or people to rob, then charged at a men wielding a legally-owned firearm when challenged
Goerge Floyd - used counterfeit money in a shop, off his head on drugs, then resisted arrest
Jordan Neely - long history of threatening and antisocial behaviour on the New York City Subway system, and was threatening to kill women and children when Daniel Penny subdued him
Kamelo Anthony - responded to being told he was sitting in the wrong place with aggression, and ultimately stabbed a White boy to death
Shiloh Hendrix - White woman who *checks notes* used an epithet that blacks find offensive after a black child tried to steal from her and her child.
There are countless more examples like this. These are just off the top of my head. But these examples and pretty much any other anyone could name all begin with blacks failing to abide by civilised standards, behaving in an aggressive and antisocial way, committing crimes, seeking to commit crimes, or trying to injure and kill people.
Doesn't matter how many decent, orderly people of Sub-Saharan African origins you or I know or have known. I've known a fair number, and some I had a lot of time for. But that does not matter. On a large scale, there is just not a single valid reason why you would want these people in general anywhere near our people or our societies.
Not one.
The same applies to pretty much every other foreign racial group to varying degrees.
The only reason anyone would want large numbers of them in White countries is if they meant us harm, wanted our homelands destroyed, and potentially, wanted our race exterminated.
There isn't a single thing any group of non-Whites can do that we cannot do ourselves and that we cannot survive or thrive without, which justifies the permanent, large-scale presence of any of them in our countries. Not a single thing.
It just so happens that Sub-Saharan Africans are probably the starkest example of this, simply because of the astonishingly high rates at which so many of them simply cannot or will not abide by the most basic rules, laws, morals, and standards of behaviour. People from most of the Islamic world run them very close for some similar reasons, and some different reasons.
Көбүрөөк функцияларды ачуу үчүн кириңиз.
