3𝕻-𝕷𝖎𝖇𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖆𝖙𝖛𝖒 𝖕𝖗𝖔 𝕰𝖛𝖗𝖔𝖕𝖆
08.05.202517:40
🗿
03.05.202512:49
01.05.202510:20
Once upon a time, the greed of tobacco companies was channeled through libertarian outrage over the restriction of smokers’ freedom to choose cancer. This time, the outrage is serving the interests of bankers panicking at the prospect of Fed accounts. Dimon and other masters of the TBTF [Too Big to Fail] universe are right to be scared, because a Fed CBDC would threaten their empire building. And bankers around the world are right to fear that many of their lucrative services would no longer be required. With those services – holding deposits, processing payments, and so on – “disintermediated,” they would suddenly be unable to hold societies hostage.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/central-bank-digital-currency-would-upend-financial-industry-by-yanis-varoufakis-2023-05
30.04.202509:19
Қайта жіберілді:
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒔𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒂𝒏𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚
08.05.202515:48
Today Marks Victory Day for the bankers and Zionists.
80 years of constant lies and propaganda so here is some truth from Adolf himself which destroys the 80 years of bullshit.
The Ultimate Red Pill
This is a compilation of some of the great speeches of Adolf Hitler. The history books, Hollywood, mainstream media, and governments all over the world have blatantly censored these so that you never wake up to the truth about Adolf Hitler, what he really was and stood for. Instead, they have created and perpetuated lies and deceit. They re-wrote the history books, created endless mountains of propaganda demonizing Adolf Hitler and concealing the great work that he had accomplished, the knowledge and wisdom that he had to pull it all off and the secrets to his incredible success. By doing this, Zionists have hidden the truth about how much German people and even allies around Germany truly loved and appreciated Adolf Hitler and the work he had done!
This compilation of his speeches gives us an honest and different look into the mind and life of Adolf Hitler. Learn about how truly great this man was and what he was talking about back then and how what he said applies to our world today more so than ever before.
80 years of constant lies and propaganda so here is some truth from Adolf himself which destroys the 80 years of bullshit.
The Ultimate Red Pill
This is a compilation of some of the great speeches of Adolf Hitler. The history books, Hollywood, mainstream media, and governments all over the world have blatantly censored these so that you never wake up to the truth about Adolf Hitler, what he really was and stood for. Instead, they have created and perpetuated lies and deceit. They re-wrote the history books, created endless mountains of propaganda demonizing Adolf Hitler and concealing the great work that he had accomplished, the knowledge and wisdom that he had to pull it all off and the secrets to his incredible success. By doing this, Zionists have hidden the truth about how much German people and even allies around Germany truly loved and appreciated Adolf Hitler and the work he had done!
This compilation of his speeches gives us an honest and different look into the mind and life of Adolf Hitler. Learn about how truly great this man was and what he was talking about back then and how what he said applies to our world today more so than ever before.
04.05.202508:37
Destroy finance capitalism
03.05.202512:46
The French offered Ibrahim Traoré's bodyguard $5m and citizenship for him and his family to kill Ibrahim Traoré.
Global Capitalists are mad because Ibrahim Traoré is refusing them control over Burkina Faso's gold mines.
Global Capitalists are mad because Ibrahim Traoré is refusing them control over Burkina Faso's gold mines.
01.05.202509:45
Lys Noir, or Black Lilyism, is a syncretic, culturally right Anarcho-Monarchist ideology based on the Black Lily (or Lys Noir) movement in France.
Black Lilyism promotes the return to a heavily decentralized agrarian monarchy and the destruction of all forms of modernism and modernity claiming that modern technology aims to enslave people. Black Lylism want to restrict technology by, for example, banning television and video games. Black Lylism also rejects liberal economics and promotes nationalization of banking and a strong welfare state.
Black Lilyism claims to be promoting a vision of so-called “Hyper France” and to defend the concept of “Ancient man” meaning a pre-modern society man, as a result he opposes LGBT rights and wants to enact policies to promote an agrarian traditional lifestyle such as subsidizing cabins in the woods for everyone.
Black Lilyism promotes the return to a heavily decentralized agrarian monarchy and the destruction of all forms of modernism and modernity claiming that modern technology aims to enslave people. Black Lylism want to restrict technology by, for example, banning television and video games. Black Lylism also rejects liberal economics and promotes nationalization of banking and a strong welfare state.
Black Lilyism claims to be promoting a vision of so-called “Hyper France” and to defend the concept of “Ancient man” meaning a pre-modern society man, as a result he opposes LGBT rights and wants to enact policies to promote an agrarian traditional lifestyle such as subsidizing cabins in the woods for everyone.
29.04.202509:17
The state is a modern invention in human history. The state did not give birth to Sweden, Mother Svea is much older and nobler than that. Sweden is our place on earth, the co-existence between the land and its people, the domain where the Swedes thrive, provided that we can defend the symbiosis that is Sweden. The state, on the other hand, is a tool, an instrument that helps realize the authority of the sovereign.
– Jonas Nilsson, Anarcho-Fascism: Nature Reborn
– Jonas Nilsson, Anarcho-Fascism: Nature Reborn
07.05.202512:45
The "Popular Rule" system of governance proposed by the National Front in the 1980s, particularly in regions like Libya, where it was influenced by Muammar Gaddafi's "Third International Theory," had several key distinctions despite their foundational similarities. Here’s a breakdown of the differences:
1. Conceptual Framework:
- Third International Theory: Gaddafi's theory promoted a form of direct democracy that rejected traditional political structures like parties and parliaments. It emphasized revolutionary committees and grassroots participation, encapsulated in his Green Book.
- Popular Rule: The National Front’s concept of popular governance in the 1980s sought to promote popular committees and local councils for decision-making. However, it still had elements of centralized control.
2. Implementation:
- Gaddafi’s Approach: In theory, Gaddafi's system focused on a highly decentralized form of governance where the people supposedly exercised complete control through grassroots assemblies. However, in practice, it led to authoritarian rule, where dissent was suppressed, and Gaddafi maintained strict control over governance.
- National Front’s Approach: The National Front attempted to implement policies that promoted broader participation in governance but often operated within a framework that was more structured than Gaddafi’s vision. This included stronger bureaucratic systems and sometimes more overt governmental oversight.
3. Ideological Basis:
- Gaddafi's Authority: Gaddafi combined socialism, nationalism, and Islam to create his ideological framework, which justified his unilateral control over the state and its resources.
- National Front's Broader Appeal: The National Front's Popular Rule might have drawn on aspects of Gaddafi's ideology but was often focused on addressing specific national contexts, including economic policies and social justice issues, which were sometimes more pragmatic.
4. Public Reception:
- Public Engagement: Gaddafi's system was marred by repression, leading to skepticism among the populace despite the theoretical vision of empowerment. Many Libyans were disenchanted with the actual implementation of "people's power."
- Response to Popular Sentiment: The National Front often attempted to adjust its governance model based on public engagement and sentiment, striving for a more representative form of governance, even if it faced challenges in execution.
5. Legacy and Outcome:
- Long-term Consequences: Gaddafi's governance after decades led to significant discontent, culminating in a revolution in 2011. The authoritarian nature of his power led to a backlash against his vision of popular rule.
- Impact of the National Front: The National Front’s efforts, while sometimes echoing broader socialist themes, did not achieve the same level of widespread notoriety or legacy as Gaddafi’s system; its ability to foster genuine popular governance was limited, and its exact historical impact varied based on regional contexts.
In summary, while the "Popular Rule" system espoused by the National Front was influenced by Gaddafi’s "Third International Theory," it diverged in its implementation, ideological basis, and public engagement, often adapting to the specific political landscape it was situated within.
This message has been generated by Nova - download it for free:
https://novaappai.page.link/Fxj6BVh541fcYPWD9
1. Conceptual Framework:
- Third International Theory: Gaddafi's theory promoted a form of direct democracy that rejected traditional political structures like parties and parliaments. It emphasized revolutionary committees and grassroots participation, encapsulated in his Green Book.
- Popular Rule: The National Front’s concept of popular governance in the 1980s sought to promote popular committees and local councils for decision-making. However, it still had elements of centralized control.
2. Implementation:
- Gaddafi’s Approach: In theory, Gaddafi's system focused on a highly decentralized form of governance where the people supposedly exercised complete control through grassroots assemblies. However, in practice, it led to authoritarian rule, where dissent was suppressed, and Gaddafi maintained strict control over governance.
- National Front’s Approach: The National Front attempted to implement policies that promoted broader participation in governance but often operated within a framework that was more structured than Gaddafi’s vision. This included stronger bureaucratic systems and sometimes more overt governmental oversight.
3. Ideological Basis:
- Gaddafi's Authority: Gaddafi combined socialism, nationalism, and Islam to create his ideological framework, which justified his unilateral control over the state and its resources.
- National Front's Broader Appeal: The National Front's Popular Rule might have drawn on aspects of Gaddafi's ideology but was often focused on addressing specific national contexts, including economic policies and social justice issues, which were sometimes more pragmatic.
4. Public Reception:
- Public Engagement: Gaddafi's system was marred by repression, leading to skepticism among the populace despite the theoretical vision of empowerment. Many Libyans were disenchanted with the actual implementation of "people's power."
- Response to Popular Sentiment: The National Front often attempted to adjust its governance model based on public engagement and sentiment, striving for a more representative form of governance, even if it faced challenges in execution.
5. Legacy and Outcome:
- Long-term Consequences: Gaddafi's governance after decades led to significant discontent, culminating in a revolution in 2011. The authoritarian nature of his power led to a backlash against his vision of popular rule.
- Impact of the National Front: The National Front’s efforts, while sometimes echoing broader socialist themes, did not achieve the same level of widespread notoriety or legacy as Gaddafi’s system; its ability to foster genuine popular governance was limited, and its exact historical impact varied based on regional contexts.
In summary, while the "Popular Rule" system espoused by the National Front was influenced by Gaddafi’s "Third International Theory," it diverged in its implementation, ideological basis, and public engagement, often adapting to the specific political landscape it was situated within.
This message has been generated by Nova - download it for free:
https://novaappai.page.link/Fxj6BVh541fcYPWD9
04.05.202508:23
02.05.202511:59
30.04.202518:11
The Green Book
By Muammar al-Qaddafi
Excerpt from first chapter;
All political systems in the world today are a product of the struggle for power between alternative instruments of government. This struggle may be peaceful or armed, as is evidenced among classes, sects, tribes, parties or individuals. The outcome is always the victory of a particular governing structure – be it that of an individual, group, party or class – and the defeat of the people; the defeat of genuine democracy.
By Muammar al-Qaddafi
Excerpt from first chapter;
All political systems in the world today are a product of the struggle for power between alternative instruments of government. This struggle may be peaceful or armed, as is evidenced among classes, sects, tribes, parties or individuals. The outcome is always the victory of a particular governing structure – be it that of an individual, group, party or class – and the defeat of the people; the defeat of genuine democracy.
29.04.202516:26
28.04.202516:47
The servile state is neither socialist nor capitalist, but a hybrid of both–where the many labor not for themselves, but for the powerful few who own everything or govern everything.
– Hilaire Belloc
– Hilaire Belloc
Қайта жіберілді:
The blackshirts daily
04.05.202508:16
"No Trade Unionist will suffer under Fascism the loss of any benefit which he now enjoys. On the contrary, he will derive greater benefits, because Trade Union funds will be available for the full benefit of Trade Union members when strikes and lockouts are prohibited.
The Trade Unions will no longer be instruments of class war. They will be one of the main pillars of the Corporate State, participating actively in the industrial government of the country. The workers will have equal representation with the employers on all corporations. In the event of dispute, the issue will be settled by consumers' representatives appointed by Fascist Government, which is elected by and responsible to the whole people.
Thus the workers will enjoy, not only security, but full participation in the profits of industry which they have never yet achieved from strikes."
Sir Oswald Mosley
The Trade Unions will no longer be instruments of class war. They will be one of the main pillars of the Corporate State, participating actively in the industrial government of the country. The workers will have equal representation with the employers on all corporations. In the event of dispute, the issue will be settled by consumers' representatives appointed by Fascist Government, which is elected by and responsible to the whole people.
Thus the workers will enjoy, not only security, but full participation in the profits of industry which they have never yet achieved from strikes."
Sir Oswald Mosley
Қайта жіберілді:
National Bolshevik Radio
01.05.202516:34
Glory to the workers of the world!
Happy May Day.
Happy May Day.
30.04.202512:18
National Socialists are usually not socialists in the proper sense. They are rather socialists in the sense that the nation should come first and thus that there should be a socialism of the nation and not of private property. This doesn’t mean redistribution or seizing the means of production, but rather ensuring that the means of production create a better nation and that the nation will not decay and will be in a state of improvement.
– Insula Qui, Anarcho-Monarchism: A Collection of Essays
– Insula Qui, Anarcho-Monarchism: A Collection of Essays
29.04.202515:00
Toyota Corporation teaches Japanese kids how to do a car maintenance.
Rhine Capitalism is Good Capitalism
Rhine Capitalism is Good Capitalism
28.04.202509:33
The National Front policy of governance (which was later adopted by the splinter group the 'English Nationalist Movement') in detail
Көрсетілген 1 - 24 арасынан 107
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.