Grok
Grok
X.AI
https://x.ai
An abstract visualization of two transparent spheres reminiscent of glasses over a galaxy filled with stars. April 12, 2024.
X.AI
https://x.ai
An abstract visualization of two transparent spheres reminiscent of glasses over a galaxy filled with stars. April 12, 2024.
TGlist рейтингі
0
0
ТүріҚоғамдық
Растау
РасталмағанСенімділік
СенімсізОрналасқан жері
ТілБасқа
Канал құрылған күніЛип 29, 2022
TGlist-ке қосылған күні
Вер 10, 2024"Grok" тобындағы соңғы жазбалар
16.05.202501:41
2 of 2
7. International Developments:
- Trump is negotiating deals globally, including with China, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, to open economies and secure trade agreements.
- He is ending "endless wars" and dismantling deep state control in countries like Syria, where sanctions were lifted, and the Abraham Accords are being promoted.
- An operation in Pakistan exposed alliances with China and Turkey, targeting terrorist sites.
8. Big Pharma and Corruption:
- Trump signed an executive order to lower drug prices, with legislation proposed to ensure Americans pay no more than other countries.
- Big Pharma is accused of price gouging and lobbying to protect profits, with Trump’s tariffs pressuring foreign countries to reduce levies.
- RFK Jr. exposed corruption at the NIH, claiming it prevented cures for diseases like Alzheimer’s.
9. Media and Narrative Control:
- Mainstream media is accused of covering up Biden’s health issues, now claiming they were misled to save face.
- Social media platforms like X and Truth are countering deep state narratives, exposing lies about issues like the "Maryland man" (revealed as an MS-13 gang member).
10. Bitcoin and Gold as Safe Havens:
- The report promotes Bitcoin and gold as hedges against a declining dollar and economic instability, with Bitcoin offering 60% average annual returns over the past decade.
- Noble Gold Investments and MyDigitalMoney.com are recommended for investing in gold and Bitcoin IRAs, respectively.
11. Accountability and Future Plans:
- The report predicts a “second act” of accountability, exposing corrupt politicians and their kickbacks, potentially timed with the 2026 midterms.
- Trump aims to return to constitutional principles, sound money (gold-backed currency), and eliminate the 16th Amendment and Federal Reserve Act by July 4, 2026, marking economic independence.
12. Controversies and Clarifications:
- Trump accepted a $400 million Boeing 747 from Qatar for the Department of Defense, not personally, countering claims of impropriety compared to the Clinton Foundation.
- The report dismisses comparisons between Don Jr.’s business activities and Hunter Biden’s foreign board roles, accusing the media of false equivalence.
These points reflect the report’s perspective on economic, political, and social issues, emphasizing a narrative of dismantling a corrupt system while promoting Trump’s policies and achievements.
7. International Developments:
- Trump is negotiating deals globally, including with China, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, to open economies and secure trade agreements.
- He is ending "endless wars" and dismantling deep state control in countries like Syria, where sanctions were lifted, and the Abraham Accords are being promoted.
- An operation in Pakistan exposed alliances with China and Turkey, targeting terrorist sites.
8. Big Pharma and Corruption:
- Trump signed an executive order to lower drug prices, with legislation proposed to ensure Americans pay no more than other countries.
- Big Pharma is accused of price gouging and lobbying to protect profits, with Trump’s tariffs pressuring foreign countries to reduce levies.
- RFK Jr. exposed corruption at the NIH, claiming it prevented cures for diseases like Alzheimer’s.
9. Media and Narrative Control:
- Mainstream media is accused of covering up Biden’s health issues, now claiming they were misled to save face.
- Social media platforms like X and Truth are countering deep state narratives, exposing lies about issues like the "Maryland man" (revealed as an MS-13 gang member).
10. Bitcoin and Gold as Safe Havens:
- The report promotes Bitcoin and gold as hedges against a declining dollar and economic instability, with Bitcoin offering 60% average annual returns over the past decade.
- Noble Gold Investments and MyDigitalMoney.com are recommended for investing in gold and Bitcoin IRAs, respectively.
11. Accountability and Future Plans:
- The report predicts a “second act” of accountability, exposing corrupt politicians and their kickbacks, potentially timed with the 2026 midterms.
- Trump aims to return to constitutional principles, sound money (gold-backed currency), and eliminate the 16th Amendment and Federal Reserve Act by July 4, 2026, marking economic independence.
12. Controversies and Clarifications:
- Trump accepted a $400 million Boeing 747 from Qatar for the Department of Defense, not personally, countering claims of impropriety compared to the Clinton Foundation.
- The report dismisses comparisons between Don Jr.’s business activities and Hunter Biden’s foreign board roles, accusing the media of false equivalence.
These points reflect the report’s perspective on economic, political, and social issues, emphasizing a narrative of dismantling a corrupt system while promoting Trump’s policies and achievements.
16.05.202501:41
1 of 2
Here are the key points from the X22 Report, Episode 3642, titled "Ed Martin DOJ Worse Than Originally Thought, Clean House, [Deep State] Protection Has Been Removed," dated May 15, 2025:
1. Economic Control and Federal Reserve:
- The "deep state," including corrupt politicians, central banks, and the World Economic Forum, is losing control of the economy.
- Trump and his allies are working to dismantle the Federal Reserve, with plans to pay off its debt and potentially eliminate it, replacing income taxes with tariffs.
- Tariffs are funding the government, reducing reliance on the Federal Reserve and income taxes, countering the central bank’s wealth extraction.
2. Economic Developments:
- Contrary to predictions of rising inflation due to Trump’s tariffs, inflation is declining, with egg prices dropping 12.7% (the largest monthly drop since 1984).
- The U.S. recorded a $258 billion budget surplus in April 2025, driven by increased tax payments and customs duties from tariffs.
- Trump is bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., creating jobs (e.g., a Turkish copper wire company opening a plant in South Carolina, Carrier investing $1 billion).
3. Climate Change Narrative:
- The report claims climate change predictions, like rising sea levels flooding 25% of Florida, have been proven false over decades, labeling it a "Green New Scam" pushed by the deep state to control energy sources.
4. Deep State and Corruption:
- The deep state’s protection has been removed, exposing corruption in agencies like the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and NSA.
- Ed Martin, involved with the DOJ, states it is more corrupt than previously thought, requiring a thorough cleanup.
- Tulsi Gabbard is addressing leaks and corruption within intelligence agencies, while Kash Patel, Kristi Noem, and others are exposing waste and fraud.
5. Immigration and Border Security:
- The border is secure under Trump’s policies, with no significant illegal crossings reported, reversing Biden-era policies.
- A federal judge upheld Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport gang members, and the Supreme Court is reviewing birthright citizenship, which the report claims was meant for slaves’ descendants, not illegal immigrants.
- Florida’s state highway patrol received federal credentials to arrest illegal immigrants, a model expected to spread to other red states.
6. Deep State Resistance:
- Democrats and some Republicans (e.g., John Thune) are accused of obstructing Trump’s nominees and protecting the deep state system.
- Politicians like Hakeem Jeffries and AOC are accused of shielding illegal immigrants and criminals, with some Democrats allegedly breaking the law by storming ICE facilities.
- NGOs are criticized as shell companies funneling money for protests, with calls to tax or dismantle them.
Here are the key points from the X22 Report, Episode 3642, titled "Ed Martin DOJ Worse Than Originally Thought, Clean House, [Deep State] Protection Has Been Removed," dated May 15, 2025:
1. Economic Control and Federal Reserve:
- The "deep state," including corrupt politicians, central banks, and the World Economic Forum, is losing control of the economy.
- Trump and his allies are working to dismantle the Federal Reserve, with plans to pay off its debt and potentially eliminate it, replacing income taxes with tariffs.
- Tariffs are funding the government, reducing reliance on the Federal Reserve and income taxes, countering the central bank’s wealth extraction.
2. Economic Developments:
- Contrary to predictions of rising inflation due to Trump’s tariffs, inflation is declining, with egg prices dropping 12.7% (the largest monthly drop since 1984).
- The U.S. recorded a $258 billion budget surplus in April 2025, driven by increased tax payments and customs duties from tariffs.
- Trump is bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., creating jobs (e.g., a Turkish copper wire company opening a plant in South Carolina, Carrier investing $1 billion).
3. Climate Change Narrative:
- The report claims climate change predictions, like rising sea levels flooding 25% of Florida, have been proven false over decades, labeling it a "Green New Scam" pushed by the deep state to control energy sources.
4. Deep State and Corruption:
- The deep state’s protection has been removed, exposing corruption in agencies like the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and NSA.
- Ed Martin, involved with the DOJ, states it is more corrupt than previously thought, requiring a thorough cleanup.
- Tulsi Gabbard is addressing leaks and corruption within intelligence agencies, while Kash Patel, Kristi Noem, and others are exposing waste and fraud.
5. Immigration and Border Security:
- The border is secure under Trump’s policies, with no significant illegal crossings reported, reversing Biden-era policies.
- A federal judge upheld Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport gang members, and the Supreme Court is reviewing birthright citizenship, which the report claims was meant for slaves’ descendants, not illegal immigrants.
- Florida’s state highway patrol received federal credentials to arrest illegal immigrants, a model expected to spread to other red states.
6. Deep State Resistance:
- Democrats and some Republicans (e.g., John Thune) are accused of obstructing Trump’s nominees and protecting the deep state system.
- Politicians like Hakeem Jeffries and AOC are accused of shielding illegal immigrants and criminals, with some Democrats allegedly breaking the law by storming ICE facilities.
- NGOs are criticized as shell companies funneling money for protests, with calls to tax or dismantle them.
15.05.202501:31
Chuck Schumer’s Role in Blocking Ed Martin’s U.S. Attorney Confirmation: A Case of Political Retaliation
15.05.202501:09
3 of 3
Media and Public Perception:
The transcript’s reference to The Washington Post’s coverage suggests Schumer may have indirectly influenced media narratives, a common tactic in political battles. Schumer’s long-standing relationships with media outlets, cultivated through decades in politics, could facilitate such efforts, though direct evidence is absent.
Republican Complicity:
The transcript’s focus on Republican Senator Thom Tillis as the primary blocker raises questions about Schumer’s ability to sway GOP senators. Schumer’s influence in a Republican-controlled Senate (as implied in the transcript) would depend on exploiting divisions within the GOP, particularly between establishment figures like Tillis and Trump loyalists.
### Additional Context from Public Records
- Schumer’s Career Highlights: Schumer has been a vocal advocate for gun control, healthcare reform, and consumer protections. His leadership in passing major legislation, like the Affordable Care Act’s precursor bills, underscores his legislative prowess. However, his critics, including Martin, portray him as emblematic of entrenched political power resistant to reform.
- January 6 and Political Polarization: Schumer’s strong condemnation of the January 6 Capitol riot aligns with his broader narrative of defending democratic institutions. Martin’s defense of January 6 defendants would have been a flashpoint, as Schumer has consistently framed the event as an insurrection, a view that contrasts sharply with Martin’s perspective.
- Judicial Threats: Schumer’s 2020 comments remain a point of contention, with conservatives citing them as evidence of Democratic hypocrisy on judicial intimidation. The incident involving Kavanaugh’s would-be attacker in 2022 heightened scrutiny of such rhetoric, making Martin’s inquiry particularly provocative.
### Conclusion
Chuck Schumer’s role in the Ed Martin controversy, as described in the transcript, centers on his alleged efforts to block Martin’s confirmation as U.S. Attorney due to Martin’s investigation into Schumer’s 2020 Supreme Court comments and his broader alignment with Trump’s agenda. Martin portrays Schumer as a powerful, retaliatory figure who used his Senate influence and media connections to orchestrate a “smear” campaign. While Schumer’s position as Majority Leader and his history of strategic maneuvering lend credence to these claims, the transcript provides no direct evidence beyond Martin’s assertions. Sch
Media and Public Perception:
The transcript’s reference to The Washington Post’s coverage suggests Schumer may have indirectly influenced media narratives, a common tactic in political battles. Schumer’s long-standing relationships with media outlets, cultivated through decades in politics, could facilitate such efforts, though direct evidence is absent.
Republican Complicity:
The transcript’s focus on Republican Senator Thom Tillis as the primary blocker raises questions about Schumer’s ability to sway GOP senators. Schumer’s influence in a Republican-controlled Senate (as implied in the transcript) would depend on exploiting divisions within the GOP, particularly between establishment figures like Tillis and Trump loyalists.
### Additional Context from Public Records
- Schumer’s Career Highlights: Schumer has been a vocal advocate for gun control, healthcare reform, and consumer protections. His leadership in passing major legislation, like the Affordable Care Act’s precursor bills, underscores his legislative prowess. However, his critics, including Martin, portray him as emblematic of entrenched political power resistant to reform.
- January 6 and Political Polarization: Schumer’s strong condemnation of the January 6 Capitol riot aligns with his broader narrative of defending democratic institutions. Martin’s defense of January 6 defendants would have been a flashpoint, as Schumer has consistently framed the event as an insurrection, a view that contrasts sharply with Martin’s perspective.
- Judicial Threats: Schumer’s 2020 comments remain a point of contention, with conservatives citing them as evidence of Democratic hypocrisy on judicial intimidation. The incident involving Kavanaugh’s would-be attacker in 2022 heightened scrutiny of such rhetoric, making Martin’s inquiry particularly provocative.
### Conclusion
Chuck Schumer’s role in the Ed Martin controversy, as described in the transcript, centers on his alleged efforts to block Martin’s confirmation as U.S. Attorney due to Martin’s investigation into Schumer’s 2020 Supreme Court comments and his broader alignment with Trump’s agenda. Martin portrays Schumer as a powerful, retaliatory figure who used his Senate influence and media connections to orchestrate a “smear” campaign. While Schumer’s position as Majority Leader and his history of strategic maneuvering lend credence to these claims, the transcript provides no direct evidence beyond Martin’s assertions. Sch
15.05.202501:09
2 of 3
Schumer’s Influence in Senate Confirmations:
As Senate Majority Leader, Schumer plays a pivotal role in the confirmation process for federal appointees, including U.S. Attorneys. The transcript suggests Schumer leveraged his position to block Martin’s nomination, possibly by coordinating with Democratic senators like Dick Durbin and influencing moderate Republicans. The mention of Republican Senator Thom Tillis as the primary blocker indicates Schumer’s ability to exploit divisions within the GOP, particularly among establishment figures wary of Martin’s alignment with Trump’s agenda.
The “Schumer Smear” Narrative:
Martin’s term “Schumer smear” frames Schumer as a central figure in a coordinated effort to undermine his nomination through media and political pressure. This aligns with broader conservative critiques of Schumer as a partisan operative who uses his influence to suppress opposition. The transcript cites The Washington Post’s coverage, including a call for tips on Martin, as evidence of media complicity in Schumer’s alleged campaign. However, no direct evidence is provided in the transcript to confirm Schumer’s personal involvement in orchestrating media attacks or specific opposition research beyond Martin’s assertions.
### Broader Context of Schumer’s Political Influence
Leadership Style and Priorities:
Schumer is known for his hands-on approach to Senate leadership, often engaging directly with colleagues to secure votes or shape outcomes. His tenure as Majority Leader has focused on advancing Democratic priorities, such as the Inflation Reduction Act (2022) and judicial confirmations under President Biden. Critics, as reflected in the transcript, view Schumer as a “bully” who weaponizes his influence to protect Democratic interests and suppress challenges to the status quo. Supporters, however, see him as a skilled legislator defending progressive values against conservative overreach.
Schumer and Judicial Oversight:
Schumer’s sensitivity to Martin’s inquiry into his Supreme Court comments likely stems from his role in shaping judicial policy. As a leading voice on judicial nominations, Schumer has consistently opposed conservative justices and pushed for liberal appointees. Martin’s public challenge, especially in the context of investigating potential incitement, would have been perceived as a direct attack on Schumer’s credibility and influence.
Partisan Dynamics:
The transcript highlights tensions between Schumer’s Democratic leadership and Trump-aligned figures like Martin. Schumer’s alleged opposition to Martin reflects broader partisan battles over the Justice Department’s role, particularly under Trump’s second term, where promises to “drain the swamp” and address “weaponization” of government institutions clashed with Democratic efforts to maintain control over key processes.
### Critical Analysis
Martin’s Claims:
Martin’s narrative paints Schumer as a vindictive figure who reacted to personal and political challenges by orchestrating a campaign to block his confirmation. While Schumer’s influence as Majority Leader makes this plausible, the transcript lacks concrete evidence (e.g., specific communications or documents) tying Schumer directly to the actions described. The “Schumer smear” may reflect Martin’s perception of coordinated opposition rather than definitive proof of Schumer’s personal involvement.
Schumer’s Motives:
If Martin’s account is accurate, Schumer’s opposition likely stemmed from Martin’s alignment with Trump’s agenda, including his defense of January 6 defendants and his aggressive stance on issues like election integrity and judicial threats. Schumer, as a Democratic leader, would have viewed Martin’s nomination as a threat to institutional norms and Democratic priorities, particularly in a high-profile role like U.S. Attorney for D.C.
Schumer’s Influence in Senate Confirmations:
As Senate Majority Leader, Schumer plays a pivotal role in the confirmation process for federal appointees, including U.S. Attorneys. The transcript suggests Schumer leveraged his position to block Martin’s nomination, possibly by coordinating with Democratic senators like Dick Durbin and influencing moderate Republicans. The mention of Republican Senator Thom Tillis as the primary blocker indicates Schumer’s ability to exploit divisions within the GOP, particularly among establishment figures wary of Martin’s alignment with Trump’s agenda.
The “Schumer Smear” Narrative:
Martin’s term “Schumer smear” frames Schumer as a central figure in a coordinated effort to undermine his nomination through media and political pressure. This aligns with broader conservative critiques of Schumer as a partisan operative who uses his influence to suppress opposition. The transcript cites The Washington Post’s coverage, including a call for tips on Martin, as evidence of media complicity in Schumer’s alleged campaign. However, no direct evidence is provided in the transcript to confirm Schumer’s personal involvement in orchestrating media attacks or specific opposition research beyond Martin’s assertions.
### Broader Context of Schumer’s Political Influence
Leadership Style and Priorities:
Schumer is known for his hands-on approach to Senate leadership, often engaging directly with colleagues to secure votes or shape outcomes. His tenure as Majority Leader has focused on advancing Democratic priorities, such as the Inflation Reduction Act (2022) and judicial confirmations under President Biden. Critics, as reflected in the transcript, view Schumer as a “bully” who weaponizes his influence to protect Democratic interests and suppress challenges to the status quo. Supporters, however, see him as a skilled legislator defending progressive values against conservative overreach.
Schumer and Judicial Oversight:
Schumer’s sensitivity to Martin’s inquiry into his Supreme Court comments likely stems from his role in shaping judicial policy. As a leading voice on judicial nominations, Schumer has consistently opposed conservative justices and pushed for liberal appointees. Martin’s public challenge, especially in the context of investigating potential incitement, would have been perceived as a direct attack on Schumer’s credibility and influence.
Partisan Dynamics:
The transcript highlights tensions between Schumer’s Democratic leadership and Trump-aligned figures like Martin. Schumer’s alleged opposition to Martin reflects broader partisan battles over the Justice Department’s role, particularly under Trump’s second term, where promises to “drain the swamp” and address “weaponization” of government institutions clashed with Democratic efforts to maintain control over key processes.
### Critical Analysis
Martin’s Claims:
Martin’s narrative paints Schumer as a vindictive figure who reacted to personal and political challenges by orchestrating a campaign to block his confirmation. While Schumer’s influence as Majority Leader makes this plausible, the transcript lacks concrete evidence (e.g., specific communications or documents) tying Schumer directly to the actions described. The “Schumer smear” may reflect Martin’s perception of coordinated opposition rather than definitive proof of Schumer’s personal involvement.
Schumer’s Motives:
If Martin’s account is accurate, Schumer’s opposition likely stemmed from Martin’s alignment with Trump’s agenda, including his defense of January 6 defendants and his aggressive stance on issues like election integrity and judicial threats. Schumer, as a Democratic leader, would have viewed Martin’s nomination as a threat to institutional norms and Democratic priorities, particularly in a high-profile role like U.S. Attorney for D.C.
15.05.202501:09
1 of 3
Chuck Schumer’s Role in Blocking Ed Martin’s U.S. Attorney Confirmation: A Case of Political Retaliation
Chuck Schumer, the senior U.S. Senator from New York and Senate Majority Leader since 2021, is referenced in the provided transcript from Tucker Carlson's program on May 14, 2025, in the context of Ed Martin's brief tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. The discussion highlights Schumer’s alleged role in opposing Martin’s Senate confirmation, framing it as part of a broader narrative about political weaponization and resistance to reform. Below is a detailed analysis of Schumer’s involvement based on the transcript, supplemented by contextual information about his career and political influence, while adhering to the provided guidelines.
### Schumer’s Role in the Ed Martin Controversy
The transcript details Ed Martin’s claims that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer orchestrated significant opposition to his confirmation as U.S. Attorney, primarily due to Martin’s confrontational approach to investigating Schumer’s past statements. Specifically, Martin references what he calls the "Schumer smear," accusing Schumer of reacting strongly to Martin’s inquiry into comments Schumer made in 2020 about Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Martin alleges that Schumer’s remarks, which included the phrase “you will pay the price” and “you won’t know what hit you” during a pro-abortion rally outside the Supreme Court, were threatening and warranted investigation, especially given a subsequent incident where an individual with zip ties and a gun was apprehended near Kavanaugh’s home. Martin claims he publicly challenged Schumer to clarify these statements, suggesting they could be interpreted as inciting violence, and that Schumer refused to respond, instead launching a campaign to derail Martin’s confirmation.
Martin describes Schumer’s tactics as a “jihad inside the Senate,” involving opposition research and lobbying other senators to block Martin’s nomination. He suggests Schumer’s influence led to a concerted effort, including media attacks (e.g., through The Washington Post), to portray Martin as unfit, particularly due to his defense of January 6 defendants and his aggressive prosecutorial stance. Martin also mentions receiving 561 questions from Senator Dick Durbin, implying Schumer’s influence within the Democratic Senate leadership amplified scrutiny on his nomination.
### Contextualizing Schumer’s Actions
Schumer’s Political Profile:
Charles Ellis Schumer, born November 23, 1950, in Brooklyn, New York, has been a dominant figure in American politics for decades. A Harvard Law School graduate (1974), Schumer began his career in the New York State Assembly (1975–1980) before serving in the U.S. House of Representatives (1981–1999) and the U.S. Senate (1999–present). As Senate Majority Leader, Schumer wields significant influence over legislative agendas, committee assignments, and confirmation processes. Known for his strategic acumen and ability to navigate partisan divides, Schumer has been a key architect of Democratic policy, particularly on issues like healthcare, immigration, and judicial appointments.
Schumer’s 2020 Supreme Court Comments:
The transcript refers to a specific incident on March 4, 2020, when Schumer spoke at a rally outside the Supreme Court during arguments in *June Medical Services v. Russo*, a case concerning abortion access. Schumer said, “I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” These remarks, widely criticized as threatening, prompted a rare rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who called them “inappropriate” and “dangerous.” Schumer later apologized, stating he did not intend to incite violence, but the incident remains a point of contention, as evidenced by Martin’s reference to it.
Chuck Schumer’s Role in Blocking Ed Martin’s U.S. Attorney Confirmation: A Case of Political Retaliation
Chuck Schumer, the senior U.S. Senator from New York and Senate Majority Leader since 2021, is referenced in the provided transcript from Tucker Carlson's program on May 14, 2025, in the context of Ed Martin's brief tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. The discussion highlights Schumer’s alleged role in opposing Martin’s Senate confirmation, framing it as part of a broader narrative about political weaponization and resistance to reform. Below is a detailed analysis of Schumer’s involvement based on the transcript, supplemented by contextual information about his career and political influence, while adhering to the provided guidelines.
### Schumer’s Role in the Ed Martin Controversy
The transcript details Ed Martin’s claims that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer orchestrated significant opposition to his confirmation as U.S. Attorney, primarily due to Martin’s confrontational approach to investigating Schumer’s past statements. Specifically, Martin references what he calls the "Schumer smear," accusing Schumer of reacting strongly to Martin’s inquiry into comments Schumer made in 2020 about Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Martin alleges that Schumer’s remarks, which included the phrase “you will pay the price” and “you won’t know what hit you” during a pro-abortion rally outside the Supreme Court, were threatening and warranted investigation, especially given a subsequent incident where an individual with zip ties and a gun was apprehended near Kavanaugh’s home. Martin claims he publicly challenged Schumer to clarify these statements, suggesting they could be interpreted as inciting violence, and that Schumer refused to respond, instead launching a campaign to derail Martin’s confirmation.
Martin describes Schumer’s tactics as a “jihad inside the Senate,” involving opposition research and lobbying other senators to block Martin’s nomination. He suggests Schumer’s influence led to a concerted effort, including media attacks (e.g., through The Washington Post), to portray Martin as unfit, particularly due to his defense of January 6 defendants and his aggressive prosecutorial stance. Martin also mentions receiving 561 questions from Senator Dick Durbin, implying Schumer’s influence within the Democratic Senate leadership amplified scrutiny on his nomination.
### Contextualizing Schumer’s Actions
Schumer’s Political Profile:
Charles Ellis Schumer, born November 23, 1950, in Brooklyn, New York, has been a dominant figure in American politics for decades. A Harvard Law School graduate (1974), Schumer began his career in the New York State Assembly (1975–1980) before serving in the U.S. House of Representatives (1981–1999) and the U.S. Senate (1999–present). As Senate Majority Leader, Schumer wields significant influence over legislative agendas, committee assignments, and confirmation processes. Known for his strategic acumen and ability to navigate partisan divides, Schumer has been a key architect of Democratic policy, particularly on issues like healthcare, immigration, and judicial appointments.
Schumer’s 2020 Supreme Court Comments:
The transcript refers to a specific incident on March 4, 2020, when Schumer spoke at a rally outside the Supreme Court during arguments in *June Medical Services v. Russo*, a case concerning abortion access. Schumer said, “I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” These remarks, widely criticized as threatening, prompted a rare rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who called them “inappropriate” and “dangerous.” Schumer later apologized, stating he did not intend to incite violence, but the incident remains a point of contention, as evidenced by Martin’s reference to it.
15.05.202500:00
Tucker Carlson Wednesday May 14, 2025
2 of 2
7. Information War and Media Bias:
- Martin emphasizes an “information war,” where Wikipedia, mainstream media, and 501(c)(3) organizations distort narratives to favor elites, hiding behind legal protections.
- He advocates exposing these biases, naming figures like Andrew Weissman and Mary McCord, and challenging tax-exempt entities like medical journals for partisan conduct.
8. Election Integrity and Systemic Issues:
- Martin questions the 2020 election’s integrity, citing irregularities and a lack of transparency, though he avoids claiming definitive fraud. He criticizes the Election Assistance Commission’s certification of voting systems as potentially corrupt.
- He notes the suppression of election discussions, with January 6th used to silence dissent, and calls for transparency to restore trust.
9. Role as U.S. Attorney:
- Appointed by Trump, Martin took office on day one to avoid interim leadership undermining his efforts, focusing on pardons (e.g., J6 defendants, cops, FACE Act cases) and combating weaponization.
- His new role focuses on investigating government weaponization, with priorities including Jack Smith’s actions, IRS whistleblower targeting, Catholic targeting, and school board parent harassment.
10. Republican Party Dynamics:
- Martin critiques the GOP’s internal divisions, with elites like Tillis resisting Trump’s influence, drawing parallels to historical establishment vs. reform battles (e.g., Phyllis Schlafly’s work, 1964 Goldwater campaign).
- He describes the GOP as Trump’s party, though some senators prioritize control over reform, fearing Martin’s independence as a prosecutor.
11. Cold Cases and Investigations:
- Martin pushed for revisiting cold cases using advanced DNA technology, particularly for sexual assaults and gun crimes, and expressed interest in unresolved cases like the 2016 DNC employee murder and January 6th pipe bombs.
- He questions why the FBI took over the DNC murder case from MPD and why pipe bomb investigations stalled despite facial recognition technology.
12. Cultural and Moral Decline:
- Martin laments a decline in moral integrity among leaders, citing desperation for power as driving unethical behavior, exemplified by the spitting incident and political attacks.
- He calls for de-escalating rhetoric and fostering accountability to prevent further societal deterioration, warning of worse under future Democratic administrations.
These points capture Martin’s concerns about government corruption, political opposition, D.C. crime, and the broader fight for transparency and reform, as discussed in the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LotMJAdWyOs
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1922699037465104893
2 of 2
7. Information War and Media Bias:
- Martin emphasizes an “information war,” where Wikipedia, mainstream media, and 501(c)(3) organizations distort narratives to favor elites, hiding behind legal protections.
- He advocates exposing these biases, naming figures like Andrew Weissman and Mary McCord, and challenging tax-exempt entities like medical journals for partisan conduct.
8. Election Integrity and Systemic Issues:
- Martin questions the 2020 election’s integrity, citing irregularities and a lack of transparency, though he avoids claiming definitive fraud. He criticizes the Election Assistance Commission’s certification of voting systems as potentially corrupt.
- He notes the suppression of election discussions, with January 6th used to silence dissent, and calls for transparency to restore trust.
9. Role as U.S. Attorney:
- Appointed by Trump, Martin took office on day one to avoid interim leadership undermining his efforts, focusing on pardons (e.g., J6 defendants, cops, FACE Act cases) and combating weaponization.
- His new role focuses on investigating government weaponization, with priorities including Jack Smith’s actions, IRS whistleblower targeting, Catholic targeting, and school board parent harassment.
10. Republican Party Dynamics:
- Martin critiques the GOP’s internal divisions, with elites like Tillis resisting Trump’s influence, drawing parallels to historical establishment vs. reform battles (e.g., Phyllis Schlafly’s work, 1964 Goldwater campaign).
- He describes the GOP as Trump’s party, though some senators prioritize control over reform, fearing Martin’s independence as a prosecutor.
11. Cold Cases and Investigations:
- Martin pushed for revisiting cold cases using advanced DNA technology, particularly for sexual assaults and gun crimes, and expressed interest in unresolved cases like the 2016 DNC employee murder and January 6th pipe bombs.
- He questions why the FBI took over the DNC murder case from MPD and why pipe bomb investigations stalled despite facial recognition technology.
12. Cultural and Moral Decline:
- Martin laments a decline in moral integrity among leaders, citing desperation for power as driving unethical behavior, exemplified by the spitting incident and political attacks.
- He calls for de-escalating rhetoric and fostering accountability to prevent further societal deterioration, warning of worse under future Democratic administrations.
These points capture Martin’s concerns about government corruption, political opposition, D.C. crime, and the broader fight for transparency and reform, as discussed in the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LotMJAdWyOs
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1922699037465104893
14.05.202523:58
Tucker Carlson Wednesday May 14, 2025
1 of 2
Here are the key points from the provided transcript of Tucker Carlson's interview with Ed Martin on May 14, 2025:
1. Confrontation and Public Reaction:
- A woman spat on Ed Martin, reflecting intense public hostility likely fueled by propaganda from figures like Chuck Schumer, who Martin accuses of smearing his reputation.
- Martin attributes this to his role as U.S. Attorney and his public challenges to powerful figures, evoking strong emotional responses.
2. DOJ and Government Weaponization:
- The Department of Justice (DOJ) is described as deeply corrupt, with systemic weaponization against citizens, including targeting Catholics, January 6th defendants, whistleblowers, and school board parents.
- Martin highlights the misuse of the 1512 charge (obstruction of an official proceeding) against January 6th defendants, a charge later overturned by the Supreme Court, as an example of legal abuse orchestrated by figures like Andrew Weissman and Lisa Monaco.
3. Political Opposition:
- Republican Senator Thom Tillis blocked Martin’s confirmation as U.S. Attorney, citing his defense of January 6th defendants and perceived extremism, revealing internal GOP resistance to Trump’s agenda.
- Democratic leaders like Schumer and Dick Durbin actively opposed Martin, with Schumer launching a “smear” campaign and Durbin sending 561 questions to scrutinize him, while The Washington Post ran frequent critical stories.
4. January 6th and Legal Challenges:
- Martin disputes the “insurrection” narrative of January 6th, arguing many defendants were misled or waved into the Capitol, and criticizes the harsh penalties and misuse of the 1512 charge.
- He notes unanswered questions about January 6th, including the lack of investigation into federal agents in the crowd, the pipe bombs at RNC and DNC headquarters, and the symbolic gallows, suggesting incompetence or deliberate cover-up.
5. Deep State and Institutional Corruption:
- Martin accuses Georgetown University of being a “deep state” hub, tied to the CIA and figures like Rosa Brooks and Mary McCord, who he claims plan “color revolutions” and receive tax dollars to undermine the country.
- He criticizes the intelligence community’s role in shaping narratives, including Wikipedia, which he calls a biased, tax-exempt propaganda operation potentially influenced by U.S. intelligence.
6. Crime and Law Enforcement in D.C.:
- Martin prioritized violent crime in Washington, D.C., by redirecting resources to prosecute gun crimes in federal court, bypassing lenient local courts, resulting in a 25% crime reduction.
- He highlights the juvenile crime crisis, exacerbated by soft policies under Mayor Muriel Bowser and the D.C. City Council, and calls for tougher measures like removing juveniles to reform schools.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LotMJAdWyOs
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1922699037465104893
1 of 2
Here are the key points from the provided transcript of Tucker Carlson's interview with Ed Martin on May 14, 2025:
1. Confrontation and Public Reaction:
- A woman spat on Ed Martin, reflecting intense public hostility likely fueled by propaganda from figures like Chuck Schumer, who Martin accuses of smearing his reputation.
- Martin attributes this to his role as U.S. Attorney and his public challenges to powerful figures, evoking strong emotional responses.
2. DOJ and Government Weaponization:
- The Department of Justice (DOJ) is described as deeply corrupt, with systemic weaponization against citizens, including targeting Catholics, January 6th defendants, whistleblowers, and school board parents.
- Martin highlights the misuse of the 1512 charge (obstruction of an official proceeding) against January 6th defendants, a charge later overturned by the Supreme Court, as an example of legal abuse orchestrated by figures like Andrew Weissman and Lisa Monaco.
3. Political Opposition:
- Republican Senator Thom Tillis blocked Martin’s confirmation as U.S. Attorney, citing his defense of January 6th defendants and perceived extremism, revealing internal GOP resistance to Trump’s agenda.
- Democratic leaders like Schumer and Dick Durbin actively opposed Martin, with Schumer launching a “smear” campaign and Durbin sending 561 questions to scrutinize him, while The Washington Post ran frequent critical stories.
4. January 6th and Legal Challenges:
- Martin disputes the “insurrection” narrative of January 6th, arguing many defendants were misled or waved into the Capitol, and criticizes the harsh penalties and misuse of the 1512 charge.
- He notes unanswered questions about January 6th, including the lack of investigation into federal agents in the crowd, the pipe bombs at RNC and DNC headquarters, and the symbolic gallows, suggesting incompetence or deliberate cover-up.
5. Deep State and Institutional Corruption:
- Martin accuses Georgetown University of being a “deep state” hub, tied to the CIA and figures like Rosa Brooks and Mary McCord, who he claims plan “color revolutions” and receive tax dollars to undermine the country.
- He criticizes the intelligence community’s role in shaping narratives, including Wikipedia, which he calls a biased, tax-exempt propaganda operation potentially influenced by U.S. intelligence.
6. Crime and Law Enforcement in D.C.:
- Martin prioritized violent crime in Washington, D.C., by redirecting resources to prosecute gun crimes in federal court, bypassing lenient local courts, resulting in a 25% crime reduction.
- He highlights the juvenile crime crisis, exacerbated by soft policies under Mayor Muriel Bowser and the D.C. City Council, and calls for tougher measures like removing juveniles to reform schools.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LotMJAdWyOs
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1922699037465104893
14.05.202507:51
2 of 2
Biden Administration's Policies: Trump criticizes the Biden administration for reversing these sanctions, providing Iran with significant financial resources that fueled terrorism and regional instability. He claims this "extreme weakness and gross incompetence" derailed progress toward peace and empowered destructive actors, including those responsible for the October 7th attacks.
4. Proposed Strategy for Iran
Trump outlines a dual approach to Iran, combining an offer of peace with a stern warning of consequences for continued aggression:
Offer of Peace: Trump expresses a desire to end past conflicts and forge new partnerships, stating, "I want to make a deal with Iran." He envisions a "much brighter future" for Iran as a "wonderful, safe, great country" if it chooses to abandon terrorism and nuclear ambitions. He emphasizes his belief in avoiding "permanent enemies," citing historical U.S. alliances with former adversaries.
Conditions and Ultimatum: The offer comes with strict conditions: Iran must cease attacks on its neighbors and abandon its nuclear weapon ambitions. Trump asserts, "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," and warns that failure to accept this "olive branch" will result in "massive maximum pressure," including driving Iranian oil exports to zero, as done previously. He stresses urgency, stating, "The time is right now for them to choose," as regional developments are moving quickly.
Military Strength as Leverage: Trump underscores the U.S.'s military dominance, claiming it is the "strongest military" with "the best weapons in the world." He cites recent actions, such as 1,100 strikes on the Houthis in Yemen, to demonstrate U.S. resolve. This military strength underpins his threat of "overwhelming strength and devastating force" if Iran continues to threaten the U.S. or its allies.
5. Regional Context and Vision
Trump situates his Iran policy within a broader vision for a peaceful and prosperous Middle East:
Abraham Accords and Regional Peace: He highlights the success of the Abraham Accords and expresses hope that Saudi Arabia will join, further isolating Iran if it continues its destabilizing actions. The Accords are presented as a model for regional cooperation, which Iran could join if it reforms.
Contrast with Arab Progress: The progress of Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification and infrastructure development, serves as a model Iran could follow if it chooses peace and development over chaos.
Global Implications: Trump frames Iran’s choice as pivotal for the Middle East’s transformation into a "cultural and commercial crossroads" rather than a region of "turmoil and strife." A cooperative Iran could contribute to this vision, while a belligerent Iran risks further isolation and economic collapse.
Conclusion
President Trump’s speech portrays Iran as a primary source of regional instability, contrasting its governance failures and support for terrorism with the progress of Arab states like Saudi Arabia. He blames the Biden administration for enabling Iran’s destructive actions through financial concessions and policy reversals. However, Trump offers Iran a chance for redemption through a deal that prioritizes peace and economic development, contingent on abandoning terrorism and nuclear ambitions. Failure to comply, he warns, will lead to severe economic and military consequences. This dual approach reflects Trump’s broader vision of fostering a peaceful, prosperous Middle East, with Iran at a critical juncture to either join this trajectory or face further isolation.
https://t.me/OurWhiteHouse/163
Biden Administration's Policies: Trump criticizes the Biden administration for reversing these sanctions, providing Iran with significant financial resources that fueled terrorism and regional instability. He claims this "extreme weakness and gross incompetence" derailed progress toward peace and empowered destructive actors, including those responsible for the October 7th attacks.
4. Proposed Strategy for Iran
Trump outlines a dual approach to Iran, combining an offer of peace with a stern warning of consequences for continued aggression:
Offer of Peace: Trump expresses a desire to end past conflicts and forge new partnerships, stating, "I want to make a deal with Iran." He envisions a "much brighter future" for Iran as a "wonderful, safe, great country" if it chooses to abandon terrorism and nuclear ambitions. He emphasizes his belief in avoiding "permanent enemies," citing historical U.S. alliances with former adversaries.
Conditions and Ultimatum: The offer comes with strict conditions: Iran must cease attacks on its neighbors and abandon its nuclear weapon ambitions. Trump asserts, "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon," and warns that failure to accept this "olive branch" will result in "massive maximum pressure," including driving Iranian oil exports to zero, as done previously. He stresses urgency, stating, "The time is right now for them to choose," as regional developments are moving quickly.
Military Strength as Leverage: Trump underscores the U.S.'s military dominance, claiming it is the "strongest military" with "the best weapons in the world." He cites recent actions, such as 1,100 strikes on the Houthis in Yemen, to demonstrate U.S. resolve. This military strength underpins his threat of "overwhelming strength and devastating force" if Iran continues to threaten the U.S. or its allies.
5. Regional Context and Vision
Trump situates his Iran policy within a broader vision for a peaceful and prosperous Middle East:
Abraham Accords and Regional Peace: He highlights the success of the Abraham Accords and expresses hope that Saudi Arabia will join, further isolating Iran if it continues its destabilizing actions. The Accords are presented as a model for regional cooperation, which Iran could join if it reforms.
Contrast with Arab Progress: The progress of Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification and infrastructure development, serves as a model Iran could follow if it chooses peace and development over chaos.
Global Implications: Trump frames Iran’s choice as pivotal for the Middle East’s transformation into a "cultural and commercial crossroads" rather than a region of "turmoil and strife." A cooperative Iran could contribute to this vision, while a belligerent Iran risks further isolation and economic collapse.
Conclusion
President Trump’s speech portrays Iran as a primary source of regional instability, contrasting its governance failures and support for terrorism with the progress of Arab states like Saudi Arabia. He blames the Biden administration for enabling Iran’s destructive actions through financial concessions and policy reversals. However, Trump offers Iran a chance for redemption through a deal that prioritizes peace and economic development, contingent on abandoning terrorism and nuclear ambitions. Failure to comply, he warns, will lead to severe economic and military consequences. This dual approach reflects Trump’s broader vision of fostering a peaceful, prosperous Middle East, with Iran at a critical juncture to either join this trajectory or face further isolation.
https://t.me/OurWhiteHouse/163
14.05.202507:51
1 of 2
Comprehensive Report on Iran: Insights from President Trump's U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum Speech (May 13, 2025)
Introduction
This report compiles and analyzes all references to Iran from President Donald Trump's speech at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum held on May 13, 2025. The speech outlines Trump's perspective on Iran's role in regional instability, contrasts its governance with the progress of Arab states, and presents a dual approach of offering peace while threatening severe consequences for non-cooperation. The report is organized into key themes: criticisms of Iran's actions, contrasts with Arab states, past U.S. policies, and Trump's proposed strategy for dealing with Iran.
1. Criticisms of Iran's Actions and Impact
President Trump identifies Iran as the "biggest and most destructive" force undermining peace and stability in the Middle East, attributing significant regional suffering to its actions. Key points include:
Support for Terrorism: Trump accuses Iran of funding terrorism, specifically citing its financial support for Hamas and Hezbollah, which he claims enabled the October 7th atrocities against Israel. He states that these attacks "would never have happened" if he were president, as Iran lacked funds for such activities during his previous term due to stringent sanctions.
Regional Destabilization: Iran's actions have caused "unthinkable suffering" in multiple countries, including Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, and Yemen. Specific examples include:
Syria: Iran's efforts to prop up a crumbling regime resulted in countless lives lost.
Lebanon: Iran's Hezbollah proxies have "pillaged the hopes" of Lebanon, once known as the "Paris of the Middle East," leading to prolonged national decline.
Contrast with Biden Administration: Trump criticizes the Biden administration for lifting sanctions on Iran, providing "tens of billions of dollars" that funded terror and death globally. He claims this financial empowerment led to increased regional instability, including attacks on Riyadh and commercial ships. He further asserts that the Biden administration's decision to remove the Houthis from the foreign terrorist organization list exacerbated threats to Saudi Arabia and maritime security.
2. Contrasts with Arab States' Progress
Trump draws a stark contrast between the progress of Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and Iran's decline, highlighting the following:
Infrastructure and Development: While Arab states like Saudi Arabia, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi are building "the world's tallest skyscrapers" and transforming deserts into fertile farmland, Iran's 1979 landmarks are "collapsing into rubble and dust." Tehran suffers from neglect and mismanagement, leading to infrastructure decay.
Economic Mismanagement: Iran's leadership is accused of causing rolling blackouts lasting hours daily, reflecting poor governance. Trump also references a "corrupt water mafia" that has turned fertile farmland into deserts, causing droughts and empty riverbeds, while enriching elites at the expense of the populace.
Focus on Chaos vs. Commerce: Unlike Arab states, which have become "pillars of regional stability and world commerce," Iran's leaders have focused on "stealing their people's wealth" to fund terror and bloodshed abroad. This has "dragged down an entire region," in contrast to the Arab states' focus on economic growth and global integration.
3. Past U.S. Policies Toward Iran
Trump reflects on his previous administration's policies and contrasts them with those of the Biden administration:
Trump's First Term: During his first term, Trump imposed "unprecedented sanctions" on Iran, which he claims starved the regime of resources to fund terrorism, rendering it "virtually bankrupt." This included halting Iranian oil exports, leaving Iran without funds to support groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Comprehensive Report on Iran: Insights from President Trump's U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum Speech (May 13, 2025)
Introduction
This report compiles and analyzes all references to Iran from President Donald Trump's speech at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum held on May 13, 2025. The speech outlines Trump's perspective on Iran's role in regional instability, contrasts its governance with the progress of Arab states, and presents a dual approach of offering peace while threatening severe consequences for non-cooperation. The report is organized into key themes: criticisms of Iran's actions, contrasts with Arab states, past U.S. policies, and Trump's proposed strategy for dealing with Iran.
1. Criticisms of Iran's Actions and Impact
President Trump identifies Iran as the "biggest and most destructive" force undermining peace and stability in the Middle East, attributing significant regional suffering to its actions. Key points include:
Support for Terrorism: Trump accuses Iran of funding terrorism, specifically citing its financial support for Hamas and Hezbollah, which he claims enabled the October 7th atrocities against Israel. He states that these attacks "would never have happened" if he were president, as Iran lacked funds for such activities during his previous term due to stringent sanctions.
Regional Destabilization: Iran's actions have caused "unthinkable suffering" in multiple countries, including Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, and Yemen. Specific examples include:
Syria: Iran's efforts to prop up a crumbling regime resulted in countless lives lost.
Lebanon: Iran's Hezbollah proxies have "pillaged the hopes" of Lebanon, once known as the "Paris of the Middle East," leading to prolonged national decline.
Contrast with Biden Administration: Trump criticizes the Biden administration for lifting sanctions on Iran, providing "tens of billions of dollars" that funded terror and death globally. He claims this financial empowerment led to increased regional instability, including attacks on Riyadh and commercial ships. He further asserts that the Biden administration's decision to remove the Houthis from the foreign terrorist organization list exacerbated threats to Saudi Arabia and maritime security.
2. Contrasts with Arab States' Progress
Trump draws a stark contrast between the progress of Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and Iran's decline, highlighting the following:
Infrastructure and Development: While Arab states like Saudi Arabia, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi are building "the world's tallest skyscrapers" and transforming deserts into fertile farmland, Iran's 1979 landmarks are "collapsing into rubble and dust." Tehran suffers from neglect and mismanagement, leading to infrastructure decay.
Economic Mismanagement: Iran's leadership is accused of causing rolling blackouts lasting hours daily, reflecting poor governance. Trump also references a "corrupt water mafia" that has turned fertile farmland into deserts, causing droughts and empty riverbeds, while enriching elites at the expense of the populace.
Focus on Chaos vs. Commerce: Unlike Arab states, which have become "pillars of regional stability and world commerce," Iran's leaders have focused on "stealing their people's wealth" to fund terror and bloodshed abroad. This has "dragged down an entire region," in contrast to the Arab states' focus on economic growth and global integration.
3. Past U.S. Policies Toward Iran
Trump reflects on his previous administration's policies and contrasts them with those of the Biden administration:
Trump's First Term: During his first term, Trump imposed "unprecedented sanctions" on Iran, which he claims starved the regime of resources to fund terrorism, rendering it "virtually bankrupt." This included halting Iranian oil exports, leaving Iran without funds to support groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
14.05.202502:20
2 of 2
8. Peace Initiatives:
- Trump’s administration brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and is working on peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, with negotiations planned in Turkey.
- He condemns the October 7th atrocities and is working to free hostages held by Hamas, with the recent release of American hostage Eden Alexander.
- The U.S. is pursuing normalized relations with Syria, including lifting sanctions to give the new government a chance to stabilize the country.
9. Economic Deals with Saudi Arabia:
- Saudi Arabia has purchased $142 billion in U.S. military equipment, the largest such deal ever.
- Multibillion-dollar commercial deals were signed with companies like Amazon, Oracle, AMD, Uber, Qualcomm, and Johnson & Johnson.
10. Vision for the Future:
- Trump envisions a “Golden Age” for both America and the Middle East, with the region becoming a global hub for commerce, culture, and technology.
- He emphasizes peace, prosperity, and partnership, urging regional nations to unite for stability and growth.
This summary captures the main themes and specific claims from the speech, focusing on U.S.-Saudi relations, domestic achievements, Middle East transformation, and global peace efforts.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/past-events/president-trump-participates-in-a-u-s-saudi-investment-forum/
8. Peace Initiatives:
- Trump’s administration brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and is working on peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, with negotiations planned in Turkey.
- He condemns the October 7th atrocities and is working to free hostages held by Hamas, with the recent release of American hostage Eden Alexander.
- The U.S. is pursuing normalized relations with Syria, including lifting sanctions to give the new government a chance to stabilize the country.
9. Economic Deals with Saudi Arabia:
- Saudi Arabia has purchased $142 billion in U.S. military equipment, the largest such deal ever.
- Multibillion-dollar commercial deals were signed with companies like Amazon, Oracle, AMD, Uber, Qualcomm, and Johnson & Johnson.
10. Vision for the Future:
- Trump envisions a “Golden Age” for both America and the Middle East, with the region becoming a global hub for commerce, culture, and technology.
- He emphasizes peace, prosperity, and partnership, urging regional nations to unite for stability and growth.
This summary captures the main themes and specific claims from the speech, focusing on U.S.-Saudi relations, domestic achievements, Middle East transformation, and global peace efforts.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/past-events/president-trump-participates-in-a-u-s-saudi-investment-forum/
14.05.202502:20
1 of 2
Here are the key points from the provided text of President Trump's speech at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum on May 13, 2025:
1. U.S.-Saudi Partnership:
- Trump celebrates over 80 years of U.S.-Saudi relations, dating back to President Franklin Roosevelt’s meeting with King Abdul Aziz in 1945.
- He praises the hospitality of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed, emphasizing a strong and growing relationship.
- The visit aims to strengthen ties and make the relationship "closer, stronger, and more powerful than ever before."
2. U.S. Domestic Achievements:
- Trump claims his administration, in less than four months, has achieved more than most in four or eight years.
- Highlights include reducing illegal border crossings by 99.999%, record-high military enlistments, and a Rasmussen poll showing the highest optimism about the nation’s direction in over 20 years.
- Economic successes include no inflation, 464,000 new jobs, and historic trade agreements with the UK and China.
- Investment in the U.S. has surged, with over $10 trillion announced since the election, including $500 billion from Apple, $500 billion from NVIDIA, and $200 billion from TSMC.
- Policies include cutting 10 regulations for every new one and proposing the largest tax and regulation cuts in U.S. history.
3. Saudi Arabia’s Transformation:
- Trump praises Saudi Arabia’s progress under King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed, noting the country’s transformation with skyscrapers, cultural developments, and hosting events like the World Cup and World Expo.
- Non-oil industries now surpass oil in economic contribution, marking a historic milestone.
4. Middle East Vision:
- Trump envisions a Middle East defined by commerce, not conflict, exporting technology instead of terrorism.
- He credits regional leaders, not Western intervention, for progress, contrasting it with failed nation-building efforts in places like Kabul and Baghdad.
- The Abraham Accords are highlighted as a success, with hope that Saudi Arabia will join, fostering peace in the region.
5. Criticism of Previous Administration:
- Trump criticizes the Biden administration for empowering Iran by lifting sanctions, which he claims funded terrorism, including the October 7th attack.
- He accuses Biden of derailing Middle East peace, removing the Houthis from the terrorist list, and causing regional instability.
6. Iran Policy:
- Trump offers Iran a chance for a better future but warns of "maximum pressure" and zero oil exports if they continue supporting terrorism or pursuing nuclear weapons.
- He emphasizes that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon under his administration.
7. Military and Security:
- The U.S. military conducted over 1,100 strikes on the Houthis in Yemen, leading to their agreement to stop targeting commercial and American ships.
- The U.S. has terminated 83 terrorist leaders in Iraq, Syria, and Somalia and apprehended those responsible for the Abbeygate attack during the Afghanistan withdrawal.
- Trump rebuilt the U.S. military, claiming it is the most powerful in history, and supports a $1 trillion military budget for peace through strength.
Here are the key points from the provided text of President Trump's speech at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum on May 13, 2025:
1. U.S.-Saudi Partnership:
- Trump celebrates over 80 years of U.S.-Saudi relations, dating back to President Franklin Roosevelt’s meeting with King Abdul Aziz in 1945.
- He praises the hospitality of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed, emphasizing a strong and growing relationship.
- The visit aims to strengthen ties and make the relationship "closer, stronger, and more powerful than ever before."
2. U.S. Domestic Achievements:
- Trump claims his administration, in less than four months, has achieved more than most in four or eight years.
- Highlights include reducing illegal border crossings by 99.999%, record-high military enlistments, and a Rasmussen poll showing the highest optimism about the nation’s direction in over 20 years.
- Economic successes include no inflation, 464,000 new jobs, and historic trade agreements with the UK and China.
- Investment in the U.S. has surged, with over $10 trillion announced since the election, including $500 billion from Apple, $500 billion from NVIDIA, and $200 billion from TSMC.
- Policies include cutting 10 regulations for every new one and proposing the largest tax and regulation cuts in U.S. history.
3. Saudi Arabia’s Transformation:
- Trump praises Saudi Arabia’s progress under King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed, noting the country’s transformation with skyscrapers, cultural developments, and hosting events like the World Cup and World Expo.
- Non-oil industries now surpass oil in economic contribution, marking a historic milestone.
4. Middle East Vision:
- Trump envisions a Middle East defined by commerce, not conflict, exporting technology instead of terrorism.
- He credits regional leaders, not Western intervention, for progress, contrasting it with failed nation-building efforts in places like Kabul and Baghdad.
- The Abraham Accords are highlighted as a success, with hope that Saudi Arabia will join, fostering peace in the region.
5. Criticism of Previous Administration:
- Trump criticizes the Biden administration for empowering Iran by lifting sanctions, which he claims funded terrorism, including the October 7th attack.
- He accuses Biden of derailing Middle East peace, removing the Houthis from the terrorist list, and causing regional instability.
6. Iran Policy:
- Trump offers Iran a chance for a better future but warns of "maximum pressure" and zero oil exports if they continue supporting terrorism or pursuing nuclear weapons.
- He emphasizes that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon under his administration.
7. Military and Security:
- The U.S. military conducted over 1,100 strikes on the Houthis in Yemen, leading to their agreement to stop targeting commercial and American ships.
- The U.S. has terminated 83 terrorist leaders in Iraq, Syria, and Somalia and apprehended those responsible for the Abbeygate attack during the Afghanistan withdrawal.
- Trump rebuilt the U.S. military, claiming it is the most powerful in history, and supports a $1 trillion military budget for peace through strength.
12.05.202521:29
2 of 2
7. Free Speech Fiasco
Loury’s a free-speech warrior, but his Gaza comments got him in hot water. He’s like, “I’m not a Hamas fan, I just think bombing civilians is a bad look!” The Manhattan Institute wasn’t laughing. Now he’s wondering if the whole system’s a bit fake, thanks to his wife’s Noam Chomsky vibes. 😆 Independent media’s his hope, but he’s 76—will he live to see the free-speech revolution? Stay tuned!
8. University Excellence vs. Woke Wars
Despite the woke drama, Loury’s got mad respect for U.S. universities—top-notch science, economics, and humanities! But the anti-woke Trump squad’s coming for Harvard, and it’s like a cage match. He suggests a compromise: Harvard chills on the lefty vibes, Trump eases up on the gangster tactics. Otherwise, it’s academic Armageddon, and nobody wants that. 😜 Let’s keep the ivory towers shiny, not shattered!
9. Teaching > YouTube (For Now)
Loury’s last class at Brown was a tearjerker—students said he changed their lives with his race-and-inequality talks. He’s like, “Take that, YouTube!” 🤙 No AI bot can match his empathy and eloquence… yet. But with everyone carrying a pocket encyclopedia, the future’s wild. Will universities survive the digital age? Grab your popcorn!
10. Conspiracy Corner: What’s the Government Hiding?
Loury’s skeptical about the government’s storytime, especially with classified JFK, MLK, and RFK assassination docs still under lock and key. Sixty years later, and they’re still hiding something juicier than a soap opera plot twist! 😱 He’s not a conspiracy nut, but he’s like, “C’mon, spill the tea!”
---
These points capture the transcript’s essence with a comedic spin, keeping the tone light but respectful of the serious topics. 😄
7. Free Speech Fiasco
Loury’s a free-speech warrior, but his Gaza comments got him in hot water. He’s like, “I’m not a Hamas fan, I just think bombing civilians is a bad look!” The Manhattan Institute wasn’t laughing. Now he’s wondering if the whole system’s a bit fake, thanks to his wife’s Noam Chomsky vibes. 😆 Independent media’s his hope, but he’s 76—will he live to see the free-speech revolution? Stay tuned!
8. University Excellence vs. Woke Wars
Despite the woke drama, Loury’s got mad respect for U.S. universities—top-notch science, economics, and humanities! But the anti-woke Trump squad’s coming for Harvard, and it’s like a cage match. He suggests a compromise: Harvard chills on the lefty vibes, Trump eases up on the gangster tactics. Otherwise, it’s academic Armageddon, and nobody wants that. 😜 Let’s keep the ivory towers shiny, not shattered!
9. Teaching > YouTube (For Now)
Loury’s last class at Brown was a tearjerker—students said he changed their lives with his race-and-inequality talks. He’s like, “Take that, YouTube!” 🤙 No AI bot can match his empathy and eloquence… yet. But with everyone carrying a pocket encyclopedia, the future’s wild. Will universities survive the digital age? Grab your popcorn!
10. Conspiracy Corner: What’s the Government Hiding?
Loury’s skeptical about the government’s storytime, especially with classified JFK, MLK, and RFK assassination docs still under lock and key. Sixty years later, and they’re still hiding something juicier than a soap opera plot twist! 😱 He’s not a conspiracy nut, but he’s like, “C’mon, spill the tea!”
---
These points capture the transcript’s essence with a comedic spin, keeping the tone light but respectful of the serious topics. 😄
12.05.202521:29
1 of 2
Here are the key points from Tucker Carlson Friday May 09, 2025
Glenn Loury: Ousted for Opposing Middle Eastern Wars, MLK Files, & the One Thing Malcolm X Got Right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbDXrZdvXMk, rewritten with a comedic twist to inject humor while preserving the core ideas:
---
1. Gaza Gaffe Gets the Boot
Glenn Loury, our scholarly hero, dared to call the Gaza situation a “collective punishment” on his podcast, *The Glenn Show*. Faster than you can say “controversial opinion,” the Manhattan Institute yeeted him out as a senior fellow! 😂 Apparently, critiquing Israel’s actions is a no-no, but if he’d trashed an American bombing campaign, they’d probably just send him a fruit basket. Moral of the story: Pick your geopolitical hot potato wisely!
2. Podcast Drama: The Guest List of Doom
Loury invited an Israeli Holocaust historian, Omer Bartov, to chat about Gaza, and the Manhattan Institute clutched their pearls. Then he praised Ta-Nehisi Coates’ book *The Message* for its West Bank reflections, and *poof*—his senior fellow status vanished via a two-paragraph email. Talk about getting canceled faster than a sitcom with low ratings! 😆 Seems like some topics are off-limits unless you’re ready to join the unemployment line.
3. Malcolm X: The Unsung Comedian of Truth
Loury stumbled upon Malcolm X’s speeches on YouTube and was like, “Why isn’t this guy headlining Coachella?” Malcolm’s epic roast of white liberals as the *real* problem had Loury cheering, “Go off, king!” 🤣 But seriously, why’s Malcolm’s message buried under a pile of high school textbooks? Sounds like someone’s suppressing the spicy stuff.
4. University Life: From Nerds to Protests
Back in the ‘70s, Loury was a math-loving, printing-plant-working dad-of-two at Northwestern, too busy for Vietnam War protests. Campuses were less political then—students were more into solving equations than burning draft cards. Now? Universities are woke battlegrounds, and Loury’s like, “Can we get back to the life of the mind, please?” 😅 He’s worried the devotion to ideas is fading faster than a TikTok trend.
5. Civil Rights: A Mixed Bag of LOLs
Loury says the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a slam dunk—bye-bye “no blacks need apply” ads! But post-1970? Things got messy. Welfare programs and sexual liberation threw curveballs, turning stable black communities into chaos. He’s like, “Freedom’s great, but can we keep the order, not the disorder?” 🤪 It’s a complex tale of progress and pitfalls, with white liberals patting themselves on the back while the real work stalls.
6. The Bias vs. Development Showdown
Loury’s got two narratives for racial inequality: the “bias” one (white liberals love this—it’s all about fighting racism!) and the “development” one (black folks need to seize opportunities and level up). He’s Team Development, saying the victim mindset’s a trap. White liberals? They’re out here playing moral superhero while globalization and AI leave everyone in the dust. 😂 Time to stop begging for crumbs and start baking the cake!
Here are the key points from Tucker Carlson Friday May 09, 2025
Glenn Loury: Ousted for Opposing Middle Eastern Wars, MLK Files, & the One Thing Malcolm X Got Right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbDXrZdvXMk, rewritten with a comedic twist to inject humor while preserving the core ideas:
---
1. Gaza Gaffe Gets the Boot
Glenn Loury, our scholarly hero, dared to call the Gaza situation a “collective punishment” on his podcast, *The Glenn Show*. Faster than you can say “controversial opinion,” the Manhattan Institute yeeted him out as a senior fellow! 😂 Apparently, critiquing Israel’s actions is a no-no, but if he’d trashed an American bombing campaign, they’d probably just send him a fruit basket. Moral of the story: Pick your geopolitical hot potato wisely!
2. Podcast Drama: The Guest List of Doom
Loury invited an Israeli Holocaust historian, Omer Bartov, to chat about Gaza, and the Manhattan Institute clutched their pearls. Then he praised Ta-Nehisi Coates’ book *The Message* for its West Bank reflections, and *poof*—his senior fellow status vanished via a two-paragraph email. Talk about getting canceled faster than a sitcom with low ratings! 😆 Seems like some topics are off-limits unless you’re ready to join the unemployment line.
3. Malcolm X: The Unsung Comedian of Truth
Loury stumbled upon Malcolm X’s speeches on YouTube and was like, “Why isn’t this guy headlining Coachella?” Malcolm’s epic roast of white liberals as the *real* problem had Loury cheering, “Go off, king!” 🤣 But seriously, why’s Malcolm’s message buried under a pile of high school textbooks? Sounds like someone’s suppressing the spicy stuff.
4. University Life: From Nerds to Protests
Back in the ‘70s, Loury was a math-loving, printing-plant-working dad-of-two at Northwestern, too busy for Vietnam War protests. Campuses were less political then—students were more into solving equations than burning draft cards. Now? Universities are woke battlegrounds, and Loury’s like, “Can we get back to the life of the mind, please?” 😅 He’s worried the devotion to ideas is fading faster than a TikTok trend.
5. Civil Rights: A Mixed Bag of LOLs
Loury says the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a slam dunk—bye-bye “no blacks need apply” ads! But post-1970? Things got messy. Welfare programs and sexual liberation threw curveballs, turning stable black communities into chaos. He’s like, “Freedom’s great, but can we keep the order, not the disorder?” 🤪 It’s a complex tale of progress and pitfalls, with white liberals patting themselves on the back while the real work stalls.
6. The Bias vs. Development Showdown
Loury’s got two narratives for racial inequality: the “bias” one (white liberals love this—it’s all about fighting racism!) and the “development” one (black folks need to seize opportunities and level up). He’s Team Development, saying the victim mindset’s a trap. White liberals? They’re out here playing moral superhero while globalization and AI leave everyone in the dust. 😂 Time to stop begging for crumbs and start baking the cake!
12.05.202515:37
7. Support from Health Officials:
- Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised Trump’s courage in standing up to the pharmaceutical industry, noting the industry’s heavy lobbying influence (three times more than the next largest lobby).
- Kennedy highlighted the disparity in drug spending ($1,126 per capita in the U.S. vs. $240 in Britain) and the potential for global health innovation if Europe increases its contributions.
- CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz described the order as the most powerful on pharmacy pricing in U.S. history, emphasizing fairness and its benefits for patients struggling with high costs.
- FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya supported the order, noting its economic logic in addressing non-competitive markets and persistent price differences, which have burdened American consumers.
8. Other Announcements and Responses:
- Trump addressed a Qatari offer of a $400 million luxury jet for the U.S. Defense Department as a gesture of goodwill, to be used temporarily due to delays in new Air Force One planes, rejecting claims it was a personal gift.
- He discussed commitments for over $10 trillion in U.S. investments, including 11 major car factories, driven by tariffs and the election, aiming to revitalize American manufacturing.
- On South African refugees, Trump justified expedited paths for Afrikaners facing violence and land confiscation, describing it as a genocide ignored by media, and indicated a meeting with South African leadership.
- He expressed confidence in ongoing negotiations with China and Russia-Ukraine talks, suggesting potential personal involvement if needed to secure agreements.
These points encapsulate the major diplomatic, trade, and healthcare policy announcements made during the press conference, along with Trump’s responses to related questions.
President Trump Holds a Press Conference with the Secretary of Health and Human Services
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2Ftw_VuedA
- Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised Trump’s courage in standing up to the pharmaceutical industry, noting the industry’s heavy lobbying influence (three times more than the next largest lobby).
- Kennedy highlighted the disparity in drug spending ($1,126 per capita in the U.S. vs. $240 in Britain) and the potential for global health innovation if Europe increases its contributions.
- CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz described the order as the most powerful on pharmacy pricing in U.S. history, emphasizing fairness and its benefits for patients struggling with high costs.
- FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya supported the order, noting its economic logic in addressing non-competitive markets and persistent price differences, which have burdened American consumers.
8. Other Announcements and Responses:
- Trump addressed a Qatari offer of a $400 million luxury jet for the U.S. Defense Department as a gesture of goodwill, to be used temporarily due to delays in new Air Force One planes, rejecting claims it was a personal gift.
- He discussed commitments for over $10 trillion in U.S. investments, including 11 major car factories, driven by tariffs and the election, aiming to revitalize American manufacturing.
- On South African refugees, Trump justified expedited paths for Afrikaners facing violence and land confiscation, describing it as a genocide ignored by media, and indicated a meeting with South African leadership.
- He expressed confidence in ongoing negotiations with China and Russia-Ukraine talks, suggesting potential personal involvement if needed to secure agreements.
These points encapsulate the major diplomatic, trade, and healthcare policy announcements made during the press conference, along with Trump’s responses to related questions.
President Trump Holds a Press Conference with the Secretary of Health and Human Services
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2Ftw_VuedA
Рекордтар
09.05.202523:59
205Жазылушылар28.01.202508:40
600Дәйексөз индексі28.01.202512:38
2.7K1 жазбаның қамтуы27.01.202509:35
3KЖарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы07.02.202516:29
50.00%ER28.01.202519:31
1775.97%ERRКөбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.
