Serbs exposed ⚡️⚡️
05.04.202509:55
20.02.202521:21
Serbian ethnologist about the infusion of Gypsy blood into the Serbian ethnos
@SerbsExposed
@SerbsExposed
20.01.202519:09
NEDIĆ'S SERBIA: CHETNIK PLAYGROUND
August Winter's telegram to Walter Warlimont concerning the situation in the Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia, july 5, 1944:
I. The possibilities of mobilizing Serbian nationalist forces alongside the German Wehrmacht against Tito are politically conditioned. It is not the task of the O.B.S.O. to solve them, But it seems necessary to point out the disappointment that characterizes the anti-communist Serbian nationalists who are ready for active cooperation. The following is reported in detail:
1. The loss of prestige of the prime minister, Colonel-General Nedić, who is now, both by his followers and by the Serbian Volunteer Corps, is indisputable, is increasingly considered incapable of receiving any kind of return from the occupation authorities for his previous loyal cooperation, which would correspond national expectations.
2. In connection with this is the loss of authority of the Nedić administrative bodies in the country, which can only carry out their tasks to the extent that the ... commissioned or local Četnik leaders are willing to allow. Given the small number of non-Reichsdeutsche forces, there was practically no corresponding and sufficient pressure from German police organs.
3. Nedic's administrative apparatus, thanks to the given internal political relations, is deeply imbued with supporters of D. M. [Draža Mihailović] all the way to the top.
4. The recruitment campaigns for the SDK launched under Nedić's name have failed due to the fear of D.M. [Draža Mihailović] reprisals against family members on the one hand and the powerlessness of the Nedić organs on the other. In June, for the first time, large-scale desertions were also reported in the SDK, especially by new recruits.
5. Political criticism of the current SDK leadership appears in the SDK itself, which is accused of handling its leadership tasks purely militarily in the interests of the German Wehrmacht, while increasingly forgetting that the SDK is a national-Serbian combat organization.
NARA, Micr. No. T-311, ROLL 191, Frs. 770/1
@SerbsExposed
August Winter's telegram to Walter Warlimont concerning the situation in the Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia, july 5, 1944:
I. The possibilities of mobilizing Serbian nationalist forces alongside the German Wehrmacht against Tito are politically conditioned. It is not the task of the O.B.S.O. to solve them, But it seems necessary to point out the disappointment that characterizes the anti-communist Serbian nationalists who are ready for active cooperation. The following is reported in detail:
1. The loss of prestige of the prime minister, Colonel-General Nedić, who is now, both by his followers and by the Serbian Volunteer Corps, is indisputable, is increasingly considered incapable of receiving any kind of return from the occupation authorities for his previous loyal cooperation, which would correspond national expectations.
2. In connection with this is the loss of authority of the Nedić administrative bodies in the country, which can only carry out their tasks to the extent that the ... commissioned or local Četnik leaders are willing to allow. Given the small number of non-Reichsdeutsche forces, there was practically no corresponding and sufficient pressure from German police organs.
3. Nedic's administrative apparatus, thanks to the given internal political relations, is deeply imbued with supporters of D. M. [Draža Mihailović] all the way to the top.
4. The recruitment campaigns for the SDK launched under Nedić's name have failed due to the fear of D.M. [Draža Mihailović] reprisals against family members on the one hand and the powerlessness of the Nedić organs on the other. In June, for the first time, large-scale desertions were also reported in the SDK, especially by new recruits.
5. Political criticism of the current SDK leadership appears in the SDK itself, which is accused of handling its leadership tasks purely militarily in the interests of the German Wehrmacht, while increasingly forgetting that the SDK is a national-Serbian combat organization.
NARA, Micr. No. T-311, ROLL 191, Frs. 770/1
@SerbsExposed
25.05.202413:46
CHETNIKS DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE BATTLE FOR ODŽAK, 1945.
Almost everyone who knows anything about the Second World War knows that the last battle in Europe and the clash between the Allied and Axis forces took place in the town of Odžak from April 19 to May 25, 1945, between the Yugoslav partisans and the remnants of the NDH forces (Ustaša and Homeguard)
Recently, changes were made on the Wikipedia page for the Battle of Odžak, where the number of Ustasha forces was raised from 1,800 to 11,000 and it was added that 1,500 Chetniks participated on the Ustasha side. The source was the post-war communist book from 1969 "53. NOU srednjobosanska divizija" authored by Mladen Vukosavljević and Drago Krasijević, another communist source that indirectly points to this lie is the newspaper "NIN", issue from June 1, 1975.
The claim that the Chetniks fought with the Ustasha in the battle for the Odžak is especially outrageous because at that time, there were no Chetniks in this area except in the Partisans. In March 1945 (almost immediately before the battle for Odžak), in this area the Chetnik squads of Branko Kovačević were met by the Croatian defense in an ambush near Gornja Dubica and chased in the direction of Balegovac - Bijele Bare Ćorić Brdo Lipa. In this operation, all the Chetniks were liquidated, including their commander Branko Kovačević.
Pilić, Stipo : Matković, Blanka "Bitka za Odžak: Rat je završio dvadeset dana kasnije", 2012, pp 16, 34
Surprisingly, this lie was taken over and started to be enforced by Serbian "NS" larpers, of course not all of them, but certain groups of children. Certainly, just another proof that nothing else is important to Serbs except larp. They have extreme hatred for the Ustaše and call them "the biggest killers of Serbs in the entire Serbian history", but they have no problem being proud and pushing the nonsense that they fought together with the Ustaše in Odžak, 1945. Why you may ask? Well, in order to show foreign NS sympathizers how the Serbs are "based" last bastion of the axis against the allied occupation of Europe. Sounds tempting, doesn't it? This is not the only example where Serbs will go beyond their attitude, their words and their national dignity for the sake of larp, but let's not deviate from the topic now.
Of course, if you would point out to these Serbian larpers their hypocrisy and contradictions, the evidence that indicates that the Chetniks did not participate, the lack of other more valid evidence that the Chetniks did participate, the lack of more detailed explanations about the Chetniks in that battle. That there were a large number of former Chetniks in the partisan ranks during the battle, they would skillfully avoid giving a clear answer, shape the topic in a different or banal direction and continue their story about the "Ustasha-Chetnik alliance against the partisans on Odžak in 1945." All these are already known Serbian tactics!
@SerbsExposed
Almost everyone who knows anything about the Second World War knows that the last battle in Europe and the clash between the Allied and Axis forces took place in the town of Odžak from April 19 to May 25, 1945, between the Yugoslav partisans and the remnants of the NDH forces (Ustaša and Homeguard)
Recently, changes were made on the Wikipedia page for the Battle of Odžak, where the number of Ustasha forces was raised from 1,800 to 11,000 and it was added that 1,500 Chetniks participated on the Ustasha side. The source was the post-war communist book from 1969 "53. NOU srednjobosanska divizija" authored by Mladen Vukosavljević and Drago Krasijević, another communist source that indirectly points to this lie is the newspaper "NIN", issue from June 1, 1975.
The claim that the Chetniks fought with the Ustasha in the battle for the Odžak is especially outrageous because at that time, there were no Chetniks in this area except in the Partisans. In March 1945 (almost immediately before the battle for Odžak), in this area the Chetnik squads of Branko Kovačević were met by the Croatian defense in an ambush near Gornja Dubica and chased in the direction of Balegovac - Bijele Bare Ćorić Brdo Lipa. In this operation, all the Chetniks were liquidated, including their commander Branko Kovačević.
Pilić, Stipo : Matković, Blanka "Bitka za Odžak: Rat je završio dvadeset dana kasnije", 2012, pp 16, 34
Surprisingly, this lie was taken over and started to be enforced by Serbian "NS" larpers, of course not all of them, but certain groups of children. Certainly, just another proof that nothing else is important to Serbs except larp. They have extreme hatred for the Ustaše and call them "the biggest killers of Serbs in the entire Serbian history", but they have no problem being proud and pushing the nonsense that they fought together with the Ustaše in Odžak, 1945. Why you may ask? Well, in order to show foreign NS sympathizers how the Serbs are "based" last bastion of the axis against the allied occupation of Europe. Sounds tempting, doesn't it? This is not the only example where Serbs will go beyond their attitude, their words and their national dignity for the sake of larp, but let's not deviate from the topic now.
Of course, if you would point out to these Serbian larpers their hypocrisy and contradictions, the evidence that indicates that the Chetniks did not participate, the lack of other more valid evidence that the Chetniks did participate, the lack of more detailed explanations about the Chetniks in that battle. That there were a large number of former Chetniks in the partisan ranks during the battle, they would skillfully avoid giving a clear answer, shape the topic in a different or banal direction and continue their story about the "Ustasha-Chetnik alliance against the partisans on Odžak in 1945." All these are already known Serbian tactics!
@SerbsExposed
05.04.202509:55
MILAN NEDIĆ: HANG THE KRAUTS!
‘Milan Nedić walked silently across Terazije, his gaze fixed on the hanged men. The muscles in his jaw twitched as if in spasm. Only when we had left the confines of this public execution ground and were already approaching [hotel] "Albanija" did he turn to me:
"Oh, my Staša! This is a pitiful first time I've been out on the streets of Belgrade, right under the gallows. For me, those unfortunate people hanging there are not communists, but Serbs whom the enemy wants to exterminate. But God will let me live to see how these Swabian [Kraut] bastards hang in this very place."
At this moment, an enslaved and persecuted Serb who knew no other enemy but the occupiers spoke out of Milan Nedić.’
— Stanislav Krakov (1895-1968), Milan Nedić's nephew, Draža Mihailović's brother-in-law and head of the propaganda department of Dimitrije Ljotić's movement "ZBOR"
(Stanislav Krakov, General Milan Nedić: na oštrici noža [General Milan Nedić: On Knife's Edge], Vol. 1, Iskra, Munich, 1963, p. 116)
@SerbsExposed
‘Milan Nedić walked silently across Terazije, his gaze fixed on the hanged men. The muscles in his jaw twitched as if in spasm. Only when we had left the confines of this public execution ground and were already approaching [hotel] "Albanija" did he turn to me:
"Oh, my Staša! This is a pitiful first time I've been out on the streets of Belgrade, right under the gallows. For me, those unfortunate people hanging there are not communists, but Serbs whom the enemy wants to exterminate. But God will let me live to see how these Swabian [Kraut] bastards hang in this very place."
At this moment, an enslaved and persecuted Serb who knew no other enemy but the occupiers spoke out of Milan Nedić.’
— Stanislav Krakov (1895-1968), Milan Nedić's nephew, Draža Mihailović's brother-in-law and head of the propaganda department of Dimitrije Ljotić's movement "ZBOR"
(Stanislav Krakov, General Milan Nedić: na oštrici noža [General Milan Nedić: On Knife's Edge], Vol. 1, Iskra, Munich, 1963, p. 116)
@SerbsExposed
31.01.202518:14
26.12.202418:22
It's very interesting seeing Serbs trying to save their SS larp by fabricating historical facts. To this day there is not a single picture of a Serb in the Waffen-SS, Serbian Volunteer Corps was never a SS formation, nor did its members ever wore German uniforms. As for 7th SS Mountain Division "Prinz Eugen", its members were exclusively Volksdeutsche, who lived in the area of today's Serbia.
@SerbsExposed
@SerbsExposed
28.03.202514:52
Svetozar Vukmanović, member of the Partisan General Staff and commander of Partisan units in Bosnia, openly talks about deep Partisan-Chetnik cooperation in Eastern Bosnia, which went as far as establishing a joint staff in those regions, not surprising considering the fact that both groups were overwhelmingly Serbian.
This is one of many instances where it becomes clear that Chetniks thrived on collaborating with anti-axis factions during the war to further their (Serb) goals, the same way as Serbian "National Socialists" lie today to gain sympathy from far-right groups.
@SerbsExposed
This is one of many instances where it becomes clear that Chetniks thrived on collaborating with anti-axis factions during the war to further their (Serb) goals, the same way as Serbian "National Socialists" lie today to gain sympathy from far-right groups.
@SerbsExposed
31.01.202518:14
Nikolaj Velimirović's letter from 1956 about "collaboration" in Serbia during the World War II:
“The meaning of this word is clear. When two men pull out a sunken boat, one with a rope and the other with a hook, then they are collaborators. Both have the same goal in mind. The same goes for hunters when they want to catch a beast, so they assign roles. And they are collaborators of each other. Because they have the same goal in mind. None of the Serbian nationalists collaborated with the German occupiers. Because the Serbian nationalists on the one hand and the Germans on the other had two completely opposite goals in mind. The Germans wanted to destroy the Serbian people, and the Serbian patriots wanted to save it and free it from the Germans. Serbian nationalists did not serve the Germans, they served themselves to the Germans.”
(Obraz: pravoslavni patriotski časopis za državotvornu obnovu Srbstva, No. 2, Belgrade, 1995, p. 23)
@SerbsExposed
“The meaning of this word is clear. When two men pull out a sunken boat, one with a rope and the other with a hook, then they are collaborators. Both have the same goal in mind. The same goes for hunters when they want to catch a beast, so they assign roles. And they are collaborators of each other. Because they have the same goal in mind. None of the Serbian nationalists collaborated with the German occupiers. Because the Serbian nationalists on the one hand and the Germans on the other had two completely opposite goals in mind. The Germans wanted to destroy the Serbian people, and the Serbian patriots wanted to save it and free it from the Germans. Serbian nationalists did not serve the Germans, they served themselves to the Germans.”
(Obraz: pravoslavni patriotski časopis za državotvornu obnovu Srbstva, No. 2, Belgrade, 1995, p. 23)
@SerbsExposed
07.12.202420:05
In his memoirs, which have been described as the best German general memoirs, containing brilliant perspective of the First and the Second World War, Hermann Balck writes about Croatian efforts in both wars, placing them in the position of first-class fighters. Serbian narrative, which with the aim of discrediting Croatian efforts during the Second World War tries to portray Croat legionaries as useless or even treacherous towards their axis allies. All in an effort to hide their shame for not sending a single man to the Eastern front to help the fight against Bolshevism.
@SerbsExposed
@SerbsExposed
24.02.202520:15
Houston Chamberlain's record from the First World War about the Serbs:
“The whole world knows what caused the conflict between Austria and Serbia; what Austria wanted and why it had to want it is equally clear; we also know that when Austria was forced to take up arms because Serbia refused to fulfill its demands—which aimed to ensure the punishment of the perpetrators of the assassination—it solemnly pledged to all the great powers that it would not seek any territorial expansion at Serbia's expense, nor would it impose any occupation or any diminution of Serbia's full, free sovereignty (see, for example, the German White Book No. 10). Thus, it was merely a matter of settling what could be called a "police matter" between Austria and Serbia; had no one interfered, everything would have been resolved within four weeks, and the status quo ante would have been restored, with the only difference being that the perpetrators of the assassination would be behind bars, and Serbia would have learned a harsh lesson to leave Austria—and with it, all of Europe—in peace. Anyone familiar with Eastern Europe knows that it is Serbia that never allows this part of the world to rest: all of Serbia is a nest of conspirators, passionate political idiots who consider themselves the center of the world, intoxicated by their imagined superiority and finding no good in others; while the Croats stand out as capable, brave, and strong, their cousins, the Serbs, are reckless, boastful, idiotic and criminal. Among the many thousands in England, France, and Italy who today enthusiastically support Serbia, condemn Austria, and repeat the Russian Tsar's foolish words about the "shameful waging of war against small and weak nation", who among them knows the situation and understands what Austria has had to endure from this one neighbor for nearly two generations? No one. Nevertheless, one would have thought that when the world learned that Austrian princes and princesses were murdered on their own soil by Serbs, when it became clear that these murderers were not hardened, depraved criminals acting on their own but idealistic youths driven mad by the wild talk of "Greater Serbia," emissaries of a conspiracy that included active Serbian officers and state officials, that the bombs came from a Serbian military arsenal, that a major provided the perpetrators with shooting lessons, and that senior border officials smuggled them across the Serbian border into Bosnia—one would have thought that a wave of outrage over this unprecedented atrocity would sweep across Europe. That this did not happen is highly remarkable and has not been sufficiently noted. The almost silent acceptance of this monstrous act is the work of the press: the press of England, France, Russia, and Italy; the press, which usually exploits such events, began to downplay the initial outrage almost immediately, and in no time at all, the assassination in Sarajevo was no longer talked about.”
— Houston Stewart Chamberlain, "Wer hat den Krieg verschuldet?", Neue Kriegaufsätze [New War Essays], F. Bruckmann K.-G., Munich, 1915, Ch. II, pp. 71-72.
@SerbsExposed
“The whole world knows what caused the conflict between Austria and Serbia; what Austria wanted and why it had to want it is equally clear; we also know that when Austria was forced to take up arms because Serbia refused to fulfill its demands—which aimed to ensure the punishment of the perpetrators of the assassination—it solemnly pledged to all the great powers that it would not seek any territorial expansion at Serbia's expense, nor would it impose any occupation or any diminution of Serbia's full, free sovereignty (see, for example, the German White Book No. 10). Thus, it was merely a matter of settling what could be called a "police matter" between Austria and Serbia; had no one interfered, everything would have been resolved within four weeks, and the status quo ante would have been restored, with the only difference being that the perpetrators of the assassination would be behind bars, and Serbia would have learned a harsh lesson to leave Austria—and with it, all of Europe—in peace. Anyone familiar with Eastern Europe knows that it is Serbia that never allows this part of the world to rest: all of Serbia is a nest of conspirators, passionate political idiots who consider themselves the center of the world, intoxicated by their imagined superiority and finding no good in others; while the Croats stand out as capable, brave, and strong, their cousins, the Serbs, are reckless, boastful, idiotic and criminal. Among the many thousands in England, France, and Italy who today enthusiastically support Serbia, condemn Austria, and repeat the Russian Tsar's foolish words about the "shameful waging of war against small and weak nation", who among them knows the situation and understands what Austria has had to endure from this one neighbor for nearly two generations? No one. Nevertheless, one would have thought that when the world learned that Austrian princes and princesses were murdered on their own soil by Serbs, when it became clear that these murderers were not hardened, depraved criminals acting on their own but idealistic youths driven mad by the wild talk of "Greater Serbia," emissaries of a conspiracy that included active Serbian officers and state officials, that the bombs came from a Serbian military arsenal, that a major provided the perpetrators with shooting lessons, and that senior border officials smuggled them across the Serbian border into Bosnia—one would have thought that a wave of outrage over this unprecedented atrocity would sweep across Europe. That this did not happen is highly remarkable and has not been sufficiently noted. The almost silent acceptance of this monstrous act is the work of the press: the press of England, France, Russia, and Italy; the press, which usually exploits such events, began to downplay the initial outrage almost immediately, and in no time at all, the assassination in Sarajevo was no longer talked about.”
— Houston Stewart Chamberlain, "Wer hat den Krieg verschuldet?", Neue Kriegaufsätze [New War Essays], F. Bruckmann K.-G., Munich, 1915, Ch. II, pp. 71-72.
@SerbsExposed
29.01.202521:19
In Appendix from Momcilo Dobrich's book "Belgrade's Best: The Serbian Volunteer Corps", it's shown that annually thousands of members of SDS [Serb State Guard], the largest "collaborationist" unit in German-occupied Serbia with around 25,000–36,000 men, deserted to Draža's faction of Chetniks. As a result, dozens of officers from "Serb State Guard" were executed or sent to P.O.W. camps for treason, including 2 generals.
For some reason, Serbs love to pretend that these police-tier units in German-occupied Serbia were some high-quality troops which fought against Chetniks and Partisans till their dying breath.
It is also worth emphasizing that during the war, the SDS was completely under German [under Meyszner's] command until the last months of war, when the whole unit came under command of Draža's Chetniks following the fall of Serbia to the communists. Nedić's Serbia, as an occupation zone, did not have its official independent army.
@SerbsExposed
For some reason, Serbs love to pretend that these police-tier units in German-occupied Serbia were some high-quality troops which fought against Chetniks and Partisans till their dying breath.
It is also worth emphasizing that during the war, the SDS was completely under German [under Meyszner's] command until the last months of war, when the whole unit came under command of Draža's Chetniks following the fall of Serbia to the communists. Nedić's Serbia, as an occupation zone, did not have its official independent army.
@SerbsExposed
13.11.202417:12
BULGARIAN ON SERBIAN MENTALITY
"There is no and cannot be an agreement with the Serbs. I know their history and their mentality well. There are few Bulgarian politicians who know Serbian history and the Serbian people well, but I have made the effort to get to know them. They are, I can say, hysterical. They are terrible megalomaniacs and their megalomania is based on hysterics. There are huge differences between you Croats and Serbs. First of all, you have a highly developed Western culture, while they belong to the East and Byzantium, on top of that, they are also poorly cultured. You are Catholics, and they are Orthodox, so the difference is clear. However, some people think that there is no difference between Bulgarians and Serbs, because we have the same religion and the same Byzantine culture. However, that is not true, because the difference is enormous. First of all, our culture is greater than theirs, then their mentality, as I said above, is just sick, they are people without any sense of reality, I would say they have an 'epic' mentality and that is a huge difference from us Bulgarians, who are sober, hardworking and very realistic. "
"As for the Serbs, this detail is interesting: several years ago, when I was an envoy in Brussels, there was a Serbian i. e. Yugoslav envoy there, the writer Lazarević. He himself told me that the mentality of the Serbs, or rather the people of Šumadija, was negative and that with such people the Serbs could not form a state, so it is precisely for racial reasons that the Serbs need to have Bosnia, where healthy minded people live. Therefore, Bosnia is needed not as a territory but as a source of people."
— Bulgarian diplomat, journalist and publicist Simeon Traychev Radev (1879-1967) in Sofia, November 27, 1941
("Bilješke o razgovoru s bivšim poslanikom, a sada opunomoćenim ministrom na raspoloženju, gospodinom Simeonom Radevom", Poslanstvo NDH u Sofiji: diplomatski izvještaji 1941-1945., Vol. 1, HDA, Zagreb, 2003, pp. 213, 215, doc. no. 55)
@SerbsExposed
"There is no and cannot be an agreement with the Serbs. I know their history and their mentality well. There are few Bulgarian politicians who know Serbian history and the Serbian people well, but I have made the effort to get to know them. They are, I can say, hysterical. They are terrible megalomaniacs and their megalomania is based on hysterics. There are huge differences between you Croats and Serbs. First of all, you have a highly developed Western culture, while they belong to the East and Byzantium, on top of that, they are also poorly cultured. You are Catholics, and they are Orthodox, so the difference is clear. However, some people think that there is no difference between Bulgarians and Serbs, because we have the same religion and the same Byzantine culture. However, that is not true, because the difference is enormous. First of all, our culture is greater than theirs, then their mentality, as I said above, is just sick, they are people without any sense of reality, I would say they have an 'epic' mentality and that is a huge difference from us Bulgarians, who are sober, hardworking and very realistic. "
"As for the Serbs, this detail is interesting: several years ago, when I was an envoy in Brussels, there was a Serbian i. e. Yugoslav envoy there, the writer Lazarević. He himself told me that the mentality of the Serbs, or rather the people of Šumadija, was negative and that with such people the Serbs could not form a state, so it is precisely for racial reasons that the Serbs need to have Bosnia, where healthy minded people live. Therefore, Bosnia is needed not as a territory but as a source of people."
— Bulgarian diplomat, journalist and publicist Simeon Traychev Radev (1879-1967) in Sofia, November 27, 1941
("Bilješke o razgovoru s bivšim poslanikom, a sada opunomoćenim ministrom na raspoloženju, gospodinom Simeonom Radevom", Poslanstvo NDH u Sofiji: diplomatski izvještaji 1941-1945., Vol. 1, HDA, Zagreb, 2003, pp. 213, 215, doc. no. 55)
@SerbsExposed
Көрсетілген 1 - 13 арасынан 13
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.