Southern History
Not Politically Correct History of the South
TGlist рейтингі
0
0
ТүріҚоғамдық
Растау
РасталмағанСенімділік
СенімсізОрналасқан жері
ТілБасқа
Канал құрылған күніAug 29, 2021
TGlist-ке қосылған күні
Feb 04, 2025Рекордтар
25.04.202523:59
96Жазылушылар25.12.202423:59
0Дәйексөз индексі10.04.202512:10
781 жазбаның қамтуы17.04.202514:16
33Жарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы28.03.202523:59
16.67%ER10.04.202512:10
106.85%ERRҚайта жіберілді:
History Clearinghouse 📜
14.04.202523:40
"Reconstruction was one big wealth grab on the South. There's a bigger reason why movies like 'Gone With The Wind' and 'Birth Of A Nation' are criticized than 'Muh Racism.' They make people think and want to start doing research instead of going along with the status quo." - RebelGrey
23.04.202519:13
Centerville, Va. 28th Nov 1861. The Southern Cross is first issued to CS troops in Virginia.
02.04.202500:28
George Pickett, Fitzhugh Lee and Thomas L Rosser, enjoyed a local tradition known as a shad bake. This involved attaching shad (a local herring) to boards, sticking them in the ground around a fire, then eating them. It had been a cold, hungry winter, and the shad provided the men with a rare treat. The only problem was that two miles away, Pickett's troops were being annihilated in what became known as the "Waterloo" of the Confederacy.
* "Some time was spent over lunch," recalled Rosser, "during which no firing was heard... We concluded that the enemy was not in much of a hurry to find us as Five Forks." Five Forks was the crucial crossroads which, that morning, Robert E Lee, the general-in-chief, had instructed Pickett to hold at all costs. The feasting generals heard nothing because the wooded area they were lunching in muffled the sound of gunfire. from Independent, Rhodri Marsden
Friday 27 March 2015
* "Some time was spent over lunch," recalled Rosser, "during which no firing was heard... We concluded that the enemy was not in much of a hurry to find us as Five Forks." Five Forks was the crucial crossroads which, that morning, Robert E Lee, the general-in-chief, had instructed Pickett to hold at all costs. The feasting generals heard nothing because the wooded area they were lunching in muffled the sound of gunfire. from Independent, Rhodri Marsden
Friday 27 March 2015
Қайта жіберілді:
Old North State
21.04.202500:38
When Lincoln's Secretary of War Simon Cameron requested Missouri Governor Claiborne Jackson provide troops for the Union invasion, this was the Governors reply:
"Sir, Your dispatch of the 15th instant, making a call on Missouri for four regiments of men for immediate service, has been received. There can be, I apprehend, no doubt that the men are intended to form a part of the President's army to make war upon the people of the seceded States. Your requisition, in my judgement, is illegal, unconstitutional, and revolutionary in its object, inhuman, diabolical and cannot be complied with. Not one man will the State of Missouri furnish to carry on any unholy crusade."
An epic response.
"Sir, Your dispatch of the 15th instant, making a call on Missouri for four regiments of men for immediate service, has been received. There can be, I apprehend, no doubt that the men are intended to form a part of the President's army to make war upon the people of the seceded States. Your requisition, in my judgement, is illegal, unconstitutional, and revolutionary in its object, inhuman, diabolical and cannot be complied with. Not one man will the State of Missouri furnish to carry on any unholy crusade."
An epic response.
Қайта жіберілді:
The New Southerner
14.04.202523:46
Terror Reign of the Jayhawkers
The Jayhawkers or otherwise known as Red Leggers were a violent abolitionist militia centered out of Lawrence, Kentucky. They had taken part in the Bleeding of Kentucky, a low key civil war in the 1850s. After the start of the Civil War, they began actively attacking into Missouri in an attempt to destroy support for the Confederacy by terrorizing and murdering the civilian population.
US Army General Blunt stated about them: "A reign of terror was inaugurated, and no man's property was safe, nor was his life worth much if he opposed them in their schemes of plunder and robbery."
The Missouri towns of Osceola, Morristown, Papinsvile, Butler, Dayton, and Columbus as well as an innumerable number of homesteads and farms were raided, pillaged, burned, with the women despoiled and the men tortured to death. This shows you once again, the tyrannical and self-righteous nature of those fighting "for the Union" to murder, rape and pillage those they considered their lessers.
The Jayhawkers or otherwise known as Red Leggers were a violent abolitionist militia centered out of Lawrence, Kentucky. They had taken part in the Bleeding of Kentucky, a low key civil war in the 1850s. After the start of the Civil War, they began actively attacking into Missouri in an attempt to destroy support for the Confederacy by terrorizing and murdering the civilian population.
US Army General Blunt stated about them: "A reign of terror was inaugurated, and no man's property was safe, nor was his life worth much if he opposed them in their schemes of plunder and robbery."
The Missouri towns of Osceola, Morristown, Papinsvile, Butler, Dayton, and Columbus as well as an innumerable number of homesteads and farms were raided, pillaged, burned, with the women despoiled and the men tortured to death. This shows you once again, the tyrannical and self-righteous nature of those fighting "for the Union" to murder, rape and pillage those they considered their lessers.
Қайта жіберілді:
The Virginia Flaggers 🇸🇴
18.04.202505:03
“And now I turn to the consideration of a grievous reproach often directed against the men who fought in the armies of the South in the Civil War. When we claim for them the crown of patriotism, when we aver that they drew their swords in what they believed to be the cause of liberty and self-government, it is answered that the corner-stone of the Southern Confederacy was slavery, and that the soldiers who fought under the banner of the Southern Cross were fighting for the perpetuation of the institution of slavery.
That is a statement which I wish to repudiate with all the earnestness of which I am capable. It does a grievous injustice to half a million patriot soldiers who were animated by as pure a love of liberty as ever throbbed in the bosom of man, and who made as splendid an exhibition of self-sacrifice on her behalf as any soldiers who ever fought on any field since history began.
In the first place, I ask, If slavery was the corner-stone of the Southern Confederacy, what are we to say of the Constitution of the United States? That instrument, as originally adopted by the thirteen colonies contained three sections which recognized slavery. (Art. 1, Sec. 2 and 9, and Art. 4, Sec. 2.) And whereas the Constitution of the Southern Confederacy prohibited the slave trade, the Constitution of the United States prohibited the abolition of the slave trade for twenty years (1789-1808)! And if the men of the South are reproached for denying liberty to three and a half million of human beings, at the same time that they professed to be waging a great war for their own liberty, what are we to say of the revolting colonies of 1776 who rebelled against the British crown to achieve their liberty while slavery existed in every one of the thirteen colonies undisturbed? Can not those historians who deny that the South fought for liberty, because they held the blacks in bondage, see that upon the same principal they must impugn the sincerity of the signers of the Declaration of Independence? We ask the candid historian to answer this question: If the colonists of 1776 were freeman fighting for liberty, though holding the blacks in slavery in every one of the thirteen colonies, why is the title of soldiers of liberty denied the Southern men of 1861, because they too held the blacks in bondage? Slavery was an inheritance which the people of the South received from the fathers, and if the States of the North, within fifty years of the Revolution, abolished the institution, it cannot be claimed that the abolition was dictated by moral considerations, but by differences of climate, soil, and industrial interests.”
— Confederate 1st Lieutenant Randolph Harrison McKim, A Soldier’s Recollections (1910)
That is a statement which I wish to repudiate with all the earnestness of which I am capable. It does a grievous injustice to half a million patriot soldiers who were animated by as pure a love of liberty as ever throbbed in the bosom of man, and who made as splendid an exhibition of self-sacrifice on her behalf as any soldiers who ever fought on any field since history began.
In the first place, I ask, If slavery was the corner-stone of the Southern Confederacy, what are we to say of the Constitution of the United States? That instrument, as originally adopted by the thirteen colonies contained three sections which recognized slavery. (Art. 1, Sec. 2 and 9, and Art. 4, Sec. 2.) And whereas the Constitution of the Southern Confederacy prohibited the slave trade, the Constitution of the United States prohibited the abolition of the slave trade for twenty years (1789-1808)! And if the men of the South are reproached for denying liberty to three and a half million of human beings, at the same time that they professed to be waging a great war for their own liberty, what are we to say of the revolting colonies of 1776 who rebelled against the British crown to achieve their liberty while slavery existed in every one of the thirteen colonies undisturbed? Can not those historians who deny that the South fought for liberty, because they held the blacks in bondage, see that upon the same principal they must impugn the sincerity of the signers of the Declaration of Independence? We ask the candid historian to answer this question: If the colonists of 1776 were freeman fighting for liberty, though holding the blacks in slavery in every one of the thirteen colonies, why is the title of soldiers of liberty denied the Southern men of 1861, because they too held the blacks in bondage? Slavery was an inheritance which the people of the South received from the fathers, and if the States of the North, within fifty years of the Revolution, abolished the institution, it cannot be claimed that the abolition was dictated by moral considerations, but by differences of climate, soil, and industrial interests.”
— Confederate 1st Lieutenant Randolph Harrison McKim, A Soldier’s Recollections (1910)
Канал өзгерістері тарихы
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.
