
Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Based Anti-Semitic Investments Ltd.
TGlist рейтингі
0
0
ТүріҚоғамдық
Растау
РасталмағанСенімділік
СенімсізОрналасқан жері
ТілБасқа
Канал құрылған күніЛют 27, 2025
TGlist-ке қосылған күні
Бер 17, 2025Рекордтар
11.04.202523:59
258Жазылушылар05.03.202523:59
0Дәйексөз индексі29.03.202523:59
7461 жазбаның қамтуы29.03.202523:59
746Жарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы20.02.202522:52
14.29%ER28.02.202522:46
1434.62%ERRҚайта жіберілді:
Megatron



10.04.202519:16
BREAKING: 🇪🇺🇨🇳 EU and China have started negotiations to abolish EU tariffs on Chinese electrical vehicles - Handelsblatt reports
@Megatron_ron
@Megatron_ron
Қайта жіберілді:
Bellerophon's Autism Plantation



09.04.202520:46
"The market dipped, then the market rose. It was a lesson to decrease your attachment to this material realm.
You must trust the plan to attain trve enlightenment."
You must trust the plan to attain trve enlightenment."
09.04.202505:25
To understand volatility decay:
%’s are smaller going down than going up:
$1000 to $50 is a 95% loss
$50 to $1000 is a 2000% gain
If I have an ETF do a 40% gain on day 1 and a 40% loss on day 2 then a 2x leveraged ETF (which resets the leverage every day) will have an 80% gain on day 1 and an 80% loss on day 2. There is more $ per loss in a % going down over the same interval
ETF
Day 0: $100
Day 1: $100*1.40=$140.00
Day 2: $140*.60=$84.00
2x ETF
Day 0: $100
Day 1: $100*1.80=$180.00
Day 2: $100*.20=$20.00
%’s are smaller going down than going up:
$1000 to $50 is a 95% loss
$50 to $1000 is a 2000% gain
If I have an ETF do a 40% gain on day 1 and a 40% loss on day 2 then a 2x leveraged ETF (which resets the leverage every day) will have an 80% gain on day 1 and an 80% loss on day 2. There is more $ per loss in a % going down over the same interval
ETF
Day 0: $100
Day 1: $100*1.40=$140.00
Day 2: $140*.60=$84.00
2x ETF
Day 0: $100
Day 1: $100*1.80=$180.00
Day 2: $100*.20=$20.00


31.03.202518:09
The case for gold:
Gold should never be more than 20% of your portfolio. Just like bonds I would hold more in retirement than during working years. I currently have 10% of my portfolio in physical gold ETF’s such as IAUM and GLD
The purpose of gold much like bonds to act as insurance on equities in case the stock market crashes. During recessions and periods of high inflation people flee to gold to preserve value in a physical commodity. While the S&P 500 has a superior return to gold from the end of the gold standard to today (1971-2025), a portfolio of 90% S&P 500 10% Gold rebalancing once a year has a superior total return to a portfolio of 100% S&P 500.
There are two main arguments against gold I’d like to address:
1. “Gold has extended periods of decline/stagnation followed by short periods of rapid growth.” Gold had a monumental price increase in the late 1970’s stagflation peaking in 1980. Gold then declined in value for 20 years before finally turning around in 2000.
The reason why this decline in gold happened was an extended bull market with no major recessions or economic crisis. Gold declined in value, because equities did magnificent. In the 2000’s, the lost decade of stocks, Gold was amazing.
If your gold has a shit return over a 10 year period, you should rejoice, because that means your equities did amazing. Gold serves its purpose as insurance against a stock market crash.
2. “Gold is pure speculation, it has no intrinsic value.” This is not true:
Golds uses:
49.2% Jewelry
19.26% Investment (bars/coins)
17.2% Central banks
12.14% industrial
2.2% unaccounted
66.4-68.6% of gold has an actual use. Jewelry is a luxury good. It’s not speculation. The vast majority of people who buy jewelry don’t do so as an investment. It’s usually much cheaper to go with an ETF or physical gold. People buy jewelry not to sell it at a higher price but to flex their own wealth and status. As long as there are men who want to impress pretty girls, there will be a demand for jewelry. As long as there are people who want to look wealthy and important, there will be a demand for jewelry.
2/3 of all economic growth is due to technology. As people get wealthier they spend more on luxury goods. Luxury goods as a % of world GDP has only increased with time, because the world has gotten wealthier.
As for the industrial uses of gold: There is an ever increasing demand for computer chips and thus an ever increasing demand for gold.
Gold is also used in medical devices an aging population means more gold. As nations get wealthier the % of their GDP that they spend on medical care increases meaning yet again we have an isn’t save where economic growth ensures gold growths at an even faster rate than the economy.
Gold should never be more than 20% of your portfolio. Just like bonds I would hold more in retirement than during working years. I currently have 10% of my portfolio in physical gold ETF’s such as IAUM and GLD
The purpose of gold much like bonds to act as insurance on equities in case the stock market crashes. During recessions and periods of high inflation people flee to gold to preserve value in a physical commodity. While the S&P 500 has a superior return to gold from the end of the gold standard to today (1971-2025), a portfolio of 90% S&P 500 10% Gold rebalancing once a year has a superior total return to a portfolio of 100% S&P 500.
There are two main arguments against gold I’d like to address:
1. “Gold has extended periods of decline/stagnation followed by short periods of rapid growth.” Gold had a monumental price increase in the late 1970’s stagflation peaking in 1980. Gold then declined in value for 20 years before finally turning around in 2000.
The reason why this decline in gold happened was an extended bull market with no major recessions or economic crisis. Gold declined in value, because equities did magnificent. In the 2000’s, the lost decade of stocks, Gold was amazing.
If your gold has a shit return over a 10 year period, you should rejoice, because that means your equities did amazing. Gold serves its purpose as insurance against a stock market crash.
2. “Gold is pure speculation, it has no intrinsic value.” This is not true:
Golds uses:
49.2% Jewelry
19.26% Investment (bars/coins)
17.2% Central banks
12.14% industrial
2.2% unaccounted
66.4-68.6% of gold has an actual use. Jewelry is a luxury good. It’s not speculation. The vast majority of people who buy jewelry don’t do so as an investment. It’s usually much cheaper to go with an ETF or physical gold. People buy jewelry not to sell it at a higher price but to flex their own wealth and status. As long as there are men who want to impress pretty girls, there will be a demand for jewelry. As long as there are people who want to look wealthy and important, there will be a demand for jewelry.
2/3 of all economic growth is due to technology. As people get wealthier they spend more on luxury goods. Luxury goods as a % of world GDP has only increased with time, because the world has gotten wealthier.
As for the industrial uses of gold: There is an ever increasing demand for computer chips and thus an ever increasing demand for gold.
Gold is also used in medical devices an aging population means more gold. As nations get wealthier the % of their GDP that they spend on medical care increases meaning yet again we have an isn’t save where economic growth ensures gold growths at an even faster rate than the economy.
07.04.202515:54
US Steel up over 11% today amid the chaos
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/07/trump-orders-new-review-of-us-steel-acquisition-by-nippon-steel.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/07/trump-orders-new-review-of-us-steel-acquisition-by-nippon-steel.html
31.03.202504:53
In retrospect US Steel was an especially good pick, because it benefited from the trade war.
Prior to inauguration we knew a trade war was possible and US steel would be ideal for that we knew it was also still possible the merger could go through.
Prior to inauguration we knew a trade war was possible and US steel would be ideal for that we knew it was also still possible the merger could go through.


08.04.202505:48
Moderna Bros with the W. We told you that the state apparatus wouldn’t allow Kennedy to go full retard. He exists to get the schizo vote.
06.04.202516:49
Very long term, Waste Management (WM) is a buy. It’s a very stable steady business practically with a monopoly that’s guaranteed to grow as long as the economy grows:
Economy grows = More stuff -> more stuff being thrown out = profit
Population growth means more people throwing out shit. It’s a stock tied to overall economic growth
.53 beta with similar growth to the S&P 500. I wish I bought before the crash.
Economy grows = More stuff -> more stuff being thrown out = profit
Population growth means more people throwing out shit. It’s a stock tied to overall economic growth
.53 beta with similar growth to the S&P 500. I wish I bought before the crash.


09.04.202518:16
Watch it go -10% next hour when orange man does something retarded


02.04.202510:36
The hedge fund with the most assets under-management in the world has dogshit returns.
https://caia.org/blog/2024/08/09/unsurprising-failure-largest-hedge-fund-world
https://caia.org/blog/2024/08/09/unsurprising-failure-largest-hedge-fund-world
09.04.202500:32
The internet has made active management harder. It used to be that if you understood an industry everyone outside of it had no idea and you had a huge advantage over them. Due to the internet the knowledge gap is smaller and more people can know more information and price it in faster. Racism and antisemitism allow us to make accurate predictions about the market that aren’t priced in because thinking this way is taboo
10.04.202519:16
Long term this is great for BYD and bad for Tesla. To make matters worse for Tesla, trumps retard tarrifs are making lithium very expensive for Tesla.
Қайта жіберілді:
Retarded Ramblings (Punished Edition)

09.04.202507:38
⚡️ Hungarian Minister of the National Economy Márton Nagy, has threatened Donald Trump with retaliation tarrifs of 57 percent on critical aviation, space, and, air transport equipment if he attempts his 10 percent tarrifs on Hungarian exports.
Hungary has disappeared from the list of nations facing tarrifs.
Hungary has disappeared from the list of nations facing tarrifs.
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.