
Andrew Bridgen
TGlist рейтингі
0
0
ТүріҚоғамдық
Растау
РасталмағанСенімділік
СенімсізОрналасқан жеріРосія
ТілБасқа
Канал құрылған күніOct 19, 2023
TGlist-ке қосылған күні
May 24, 2024"Andrew Bridgen" тобындағы соңғы жазбалар
16.04.202511:27
Chemtrails are no longer a conspiracy theory. Perhaps we should ask some questions of RVL who fly out of East Midlands Airport in North West Leicestershire ?
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
Қайта жіберілді:
Concerned Citizen

16.04.202511:26
“Those white trails left in the sky are Government Weather Modification & in the process we’re all being slowly poisoned”
Wow - Chemtrails continue to go Mainstream around the World - we’ve nearly reached tipping point where enough people now know what’s happening.
https://t.me/BGatesIsaPyscho
Wow - Chemtrails continue to go Mainstream around the World - we’ve nearly reached tipping point where enough people now know what’s happening.
https://t.me/BGatesIsaPyscho


16.04.202510:03
At least we can rely on The Conservative Woman to report the unpalatable truth. One correction to the story , I actually had 26 unsuccessful applications, before I got the first debate in the UK Parliament on Excess Deaths.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/andrew-bridgen-the-msms-invisible-man/
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/andrew-bridgen-the-msms-invisible-man/
https://t.me/ABridgen
15.04.202511:11
I’ve been looking at Hunt & Gather’s letter to Lady Simler and considering my own Permission To Appeal (‘PTA’) decisions in the past. The ‘real’ decisions seem to have a ‘shield’ stamp in the top right-hand corner, and a ‘by the court’ stamp at the bottom. The suspect decisions, which may result from corruption, have neither. Has anyone else received a PTA decision from the Court of Appeal missing both the shield stamp and the ‘by the court’ stamp? If so, please DM me. Please share this appeal widely, it is important to the rule of law.
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
14.04.202518:18
Andrew Bridgen press statement.
Matt Hancock tried and failed to stop this libel claim reaching a trial in March 2024. Now his second attempt to stop this claim has failed in 2025.
In her judgment handed down today, Mrs Justice Collins Rice dismissed Mr Hancock’s application seeking a termination ruling, and Mr Hancock has been ordered to pay £18,000 in legal costs within 14 days. The Court concluded that “This claim is … set to proceed to the full evidential stages and on to trial”
In reaching that decision, the Court noted a number of serious problems with Mr Hancock’s position.
Regarding Mr Hancock’s contention that the tweet labelling my actions antisemitic caused me no serious harm, Collins Rice J described the libel as a “relatively grave libel”, and accepted that this might well be a ‘mass publication case’.
Collins Rice J also noted that Mr Hancock refuses to take the tweet down, noting: “the persistence of the publication to the present day”.
The Court recognised my case that “‘antisemitic in character’ is a distinctively toxic and corrosive type of gall in a political context, an epithet understood to be so solemn, momentous and ultimately politically fatal as to be capable of being found at trial to be insufficiently pertinent” to what I had tweeted,
The Court recognised my case that “‘antisemitic in character’ crosses a line between fact-tethered opinion and gratuitous vituperative smear – in the wider context of a difference of political views about…. the merits and motivations of the vaccination programmes”
As to Mr Hancock’s honest opinion defence, the Judge noted that Mr Hancock was asking the court to terminate my claim but: “without his having either pleaded to or explained in evidence the genuine nature of his own belief”.
In concluding there were compelling reasons for the case to go to trial, the Court rightly pointed out that the honest opinion defence does not cover “vituperative make believe” and noted in particular “ the Jewish doctors’ letter” which said my tweet was not antisemitic and “criticised Mr Hancock for weaponizing the language of antisemitism to suppress vaccine criticism”. Collins Rice J also made reference to the Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav who was on record as “drawing parallels between the extreme and discriminatory public health meansure during the pandemic and the Holocaust”.
The Court noted that Mr Hancock had not put before the Court evidence that “other respected commentators did consider it antisemitic in character, or that similar utterances have been so regarded on other occasions” noting that “That is evidence not at present before the court”. On the contrary the Court noted that: “other commentators of comparable stature did not do, and were perhaps careful not to.. ….. condemn Mr Bridgen in precisely the way Mr Hancock did”
The Court noted that “simply setting out the nature of the disputed issues demonstrates its highly evaluative character…. not a matter to be rushed on an interlocutory basis”
Mr Hancock’s previous comments about “an absurd libel case he will undoubtedly lose” now look like the expensively created bluster that they always were.
We disagree with one comment in the Court’s judgment about the consequences of Mr Hancock not pleading the defence of ‘truth’ and we are considering whether to take that point to the Court of Appeal.
ANDREW BRIDGEN
https://t.me/ABridgen
Matt Hancock tried and failed to stop this libel claim reaching a trial in March 2024. Now his second attempt to stop this claim has failed in 2025.
In her judgment handed down today, Mrs Justice Collins Rice dismissed Mr Hancock’s application seeking a termination ruling, and Mr Hancock has been ordered to pay £18,000 in legal costs within 14 days. The Court concluded that “This claim is … set to proceed to the full evidential stages and on to trial”
In reaching that decision, the Court noted a number of serious problems with Mr Hancock’s position.
Regarding Mr Hancock’s contention that the tweet labelling my actions antisemitic caused me no serious harm, Collins Rice J described the libel as a “relatively grave libel”, and accepted that this might well be a ‘mass publication case’.
Collins Rice J also noted that Mr Hancock refuses to take the tweet down, noting: “the persistence of the publication to the present day”.
The Court recognised my case that “‘antisemitic in character’ is a distinctively toxic and corrosive type of gall in a political context, an epithet understood to be so solemn, momentous and ultimately politically fatal as to be capable of being found at trial to be insufficiently pertinent” to what I had tweeted,
The Court recognised my case that “‘antisemitic in character’ crosses a line between fact-tethered opinion and gratuitous vituperative smear – in the wider context of a difference of political views about…. the merits and motivations of the vaccination programmes”
As to Mr Hancock’s honest opinion defence, the Judge noted that Mr Hancock was asking the court to terminate my claim but: “without his having either pleaded to or explained in evidence the genuine nature of his own belief”.
In concluding there were compelling reasons for the case to go to trial, the Court rightly pointed out that the honest opinion defence does not cover “vituperative make believe” and noted in particular “ the Jewish doctors’ letter” which said my tweet was not antisemitic and “criticised Mr Hancock for weaponizing the language of antisemitism to suppress vaccine criticism”. Collins Rice J also made reference to the Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav who was on record as “drawing parallels between the extreme and discriminatory public health meansure during the pandemic and the Holocaust”.
The Court noted that Mr Hancock had not put before the Court evidence that “other respected commentators did consider it antisemitic in character, or that similar utterances have been so regarded on other occasions” noting that “That is evidence not at present before the court”. On the contrary the Court noted that: “other commentators of comparable stature did not do, and were perhaps careful not to.. ….. condemn Mr Bridgen in precisely the way Mr Hancock did”
The Court noted that “simply setting out the nature of the disputed issues demonstrates its highly evaluative character…. not a matter to be rushed on an interlocutory basis”
Mr Hancock’s previous comments about “an absurd libel case he will undoubtedly lose” now look like the expensively created bluster that they always were.
We disagree with one comment in the Court’s judgment about the consequences of Mr Hancock not pleading the defence of ‘truth’ and we are considering whether to take that point to the Court of Appeal.
ANDREW BRIDGEN
https://t.me/ABridgen
14.04.202504:16
It appears there may be a criminal in the court of appeal who is forging documents . This is very a very serious assault on justice.
What happened to @drcmday with his Permission to Appeal being "revoked" never made any sense to us. So we’ve done the legal hard yards, and there is, so far as we can ascertain, no legal way for a judge to do that. So we sent his judge - Ingrid Simler, now of the @UKSupremeCourt - this letter about the two separate documents purportedly released in her name ten days apart. Who thinks she'll reply?
https://t.me/ABridgen
What happened to @drcmday with his Permission to Appeal being "revoked" never made any sense to us. So we’ve done the legal hard yards, and there is, so far as we can ascertain, no legal way for a judge to do that. So we sent his judge - Ingrid Simler, now of the @UKSupremeCourt - this letter about the two separate documents purportedly released in her name ten days apart. Who thinks she'll reply?
https://t.me/ABridgen
13.04.202517:04
Danish Farmers report that Bovaer Fed Cows are getting sick and refuse to eat the feed containing Bovaer 🐮
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
12.04.202518:05
30 MPs who qualify for the Covid 19 booster but who won’t disclose if they had it and would recommend it to their friends , family and constituents.
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
12.04.202518:04
71 year old Diane Abbott was the first MP we wrote to for this episode to ask if she took up the offer of a Covid vaccine for the over 65s. Marie Rimmer, Patricia Ferguson, Gregory Campbell and Paul Kohler also received a letter. We received a wall of silence, as every other week.
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
12.04.202509:22
Did Bill Gates with the help of the WHO test his dangerous ‘vaccines’ in Africa and India years before the Covid 19 pandemic ?
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
Қайта жіберілді:
Concerned Citizen

12.04.202507:07
“Bill Gates through The World Health Organisation has funded programmes that have been dangerous, unethical & deadly”
“A vaccine laced with infertility was given to hundreds of thousands of girls without their knowledge”
“Bill Gates just lost his immunity from prosecution in Kenya”
How is Bill Gates not in prison for crimes against Humanity?
https://t.me/BGatesIsaPyscho
“A vaccine laced with infertility was given to hundreds of thousands of girls without their knowledge”
“Bill Gates just lost his immunity from prosecution in Kenya”
How is Bill Gates not in prison for crimes against Humanity?
https://t.me/BGatesIsaPyscho
12.04.202505:15
Dr Robert Malone - the scientist who originally discovered the mRNA technology, Robert exposes the lies upon lies we were told to justify the experimental Covid 19 ‘vaccine’ roll out . He is speaking at a presentation I hosted for MPs in the UK Parliament in Dec 2023.
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
12.04.202505:14
Dr. Robert Malone: "Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products ... we were given a series of lies."
Lie #1 - The COVID vaccines are "safe and effective," a repeated slogan RW Malone MD calls propaganda.
Lie #2 - The contents of the COVID shots stay in the arm. "They knew that these products deployed all throughout the body," said Dr. Malone.
Lie #3 - mRNA lasts in the body for a short period of time. "We now know that these products remain in your body and remain biologically active for an undetermined period of time, of at least weeks and probably months; another lie," rebuked Dr. Malone.
Lie #4 - "No one will be safe until everyone is vaccinated." Pfizer admitted to MEP Rob Roos that they never tested if the jab stopped transmission.
Dr. Malone expressed that this series of falsehoods was employed to justify the use of experimental products with high-profit margins. These products aimed to show the safety and efficacy of a vaccine platform technology (mRNA), which could then be applied for additional purposes.
https://t.me/ABridgen
Lie #1 - The COVID vaccines are "safe and effective," a repeated slogan RW Malone MD calls propaganda.
Lie #2 - The contents of the COVID shots stay in the arm. "They knew that these products deployed all throughout the body," said Dr. Malone.
Lie #3 - mRNA lasts in the body for a short period of time. "We now know that these products remain in your body and remain biologically active for an undetermined period of time, of at least weeks and probably months; another lie," rebuked Dr. Malone.
Lie #4 - "No one will be safe until everyone is vaccinated." Pfizer admitted to MEP Rob Roos that they never tested if the jab stopped transmission.
Dr. Malone expressed that this series of falsehoods was employed to justify the use of experimental products with high-profit margins. These products aimed to show the safety and efficacy of a vaccine platform technology (mRNA), which could then be applied for additional purposes.
https://t.me/ABridgen
11.04.202506:02
To cover up an 82% miscarriage rate among 1st and early 2nd trimester pregnancies and continue to push the jabs to them is murder. They know what they did and they know what’s coming for them - sooner the better.
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
11.04.202506:01
🚨BREAKING - CDC Vaccine Safety Director May Have Destroyed Records, Says Sen. Ron Johnson
Dr. Shimabukuro implicated in concealing an 82% miscarriage rate among COVID-19 vaccinated pregnant women in NEJM study — records reportedly “remain lost.” 🔽
🔴 Sen. Johnson demands DOJ, FBI, HHS OIG investigate
🔴 NEJM study claimed 12.6% miscarriage rate (104/827), but 700 women were vaccinated in the 3rd trimester—after the miscarriage window
🔴 Real denominator should’ve been 127 women vaccinated in 1st or early 2nd trimester. Corrected rate = 82% miscarriage rate (104/127)
🔴 Study falsely concluded “no obvious safety concerns”
🔴 All 21 coauthors tied to CDC/FDA — none disclosed this manipulation
🔴 Tom Shimabukuro now under investigation for missing federal records
https://t.me/ABridgen
Dr. Shimabukuro implicated in concealing an 82% miscarriage rate among COVID-19 vaccinated pregnant women in NEJM study — records reportedly “remain lost.” 🔽
🔴 Sen. Johnson demands DOJ, FBI, HHS OIG investigate
🔴 NEJM study claimed 12.6% miscarriage rate (104/827), but 700 women were vaccinated in the 3rd trimester—after the miscarriage window
🔴 Real denominator should’ve been 127 women vaccinated in 1st or early 2nd trimester. Corrected rate = 82% miscarriage rate (104/127)
🔴 Study falsely concluded “no obvious safety concerns”
🔴 All 21 coauthors tied to CDC/FDA — none disclosed this manipulation
🔴 Tom Shimabukuro now under investigation for missing federal records
https://t.me/ABridgen


Рекордтар
17.04.202523:59
10.3KЖазылушылар01.03.202523:59
900Дәйексөз индексі19.01.202523:59
25K1 жазбаның қамтуы19.01.202523:59
25KЖарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы19.02.202523:59
17.88%ER19.01.202523:59
285.45%ERRКөбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.