
Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Battleground
The battle of ideas
TGlist रेटिंग
0
0
प्रकारसार्वजनिक
सत्यापन
असत्यापितविश्वसनीयता
अविश्वसनीयस्थान
भाषाअन्य
चैनल निर्माण की तिथिJan 08, 2021
TGlist में जोड़ा गया
May 23, 2024संलग्न समूह

Battleground (comments)
2.6K
रिकॉर्ड
19.07.202412:53
30.7Kसदस्य19.11.202423:59
100उद्धरण सूचकांक13.02.202508:43
6.8Kप्रति पोस्ट औसत दृश्य14.09.202423:59
3.4Kप्रति विज्ञापन पोस्ट औसत दृश्य17.03.202523:59
237.04%ER22.03.202523:59
17.18%ERR

22.03.202518:10
No!
It can’t be!
I refuse to accept this!
It can’t be!
I refuse to accept this!


08.04.202511:32
In my inbox earlier.
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Battleground

02.04.202508:23
These are the primary 'invisible enemies' you should reject as fear porn.
- man-made climate change
- viruses/contagion
- AI taking over
Machines/AI will never take over. It's impossible.
➡️ https://jermwarfare.com/why-artificial-intelligence-will-never-take-over/
- man-made climate change
- viruses/contagion
- AI taking over
Machines/AI will never take over. It's impossible.
➡️ https://jermwarfare.com/why-artificial-intelligence-will-never-take-over/
11.04.202504:01
I don’t have any Chinese funders, and I’m saying this because I’ve come to realise that anti-China propaganda is a big problem in the West.
I’ve been there, which is what people should do. Travel there instead of believing everything on YouTube and X.
It’s an incredible country with incredible people and culture, and the most unbelievably advanced cities and infrastructure,
Forgot the ‘communism’ nonsense. China isn’t that. Or if it is, it doesn’t matter, because it’s a highly successful country with very conservative homogenous people, tight borders, no LGBTQ crap, no mass immigration, a strong focus on family and community, and strong traditions.
It’s not utopia and I wouldn’t want to live there, and the government certainly isn’t the best, but if you believe in knowing the truth about things, stop buying into CIA-backed fake news about organ harvesting and whatnot, and just go there.
I’m going to go back for sure.
I’ve been there, which is what people should do. Travel there instead of believing everything on YouTube and X.
It’s an incredible country with incredible people and culture, and the most unbelievably advanced cities and infrastructure,
Forgot the ‘communism’ nonsense. China isn’t that. Or if it is, it doesn’t matter, because it’s a highly successful country with very conservative homogenous people, tight borders, no LGBTQ crap, no mass immigration, a strong focus on family and community, and strong traditions.
It’s not utopia and I wouldn’t want to live there, and the government certainly isn’t the best, but if you believe in knowing the truth about things, stop buying into CIA-backed fake news about organ harvesting and whatnot, and just go there.
I’m going to go back for sure.


22.03.202505:29
Do you agree?


11.04.202512:04
What happened to Britney Spears?


19.04.202505:39
Trump is now officially pushing an outright lie.
This is incredible limited hangout, and millions of people will buy into it. It even has a photo of Trump between the words. 😂
Those of us who fought this narrative are losing this battle, it appears.
THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC.
THERE WAS NO LAB LEAK.
THERE WAS NO COVID-19.
This is incredible limited hangout, and millions of people will buy into it. It even has a photo of Trump between the words. 😂
Those of us who fought this narrative are losing this battle, it appears.
THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC.
THERE WAS NO LAB LEAK.
THERE WAS NO COVID-19.


10.04.202513:35
Hang on.
What?
What?
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Battleground

27.03.202519:38
'Trump is trying to please the pro-centralisation team and the pro-decentralisation team.'
— Catherine Austin Fitts
This was an incredible conversation.
You MUST listen to it.
Here: https://www.jermwarfare.com/trump-musk-and-the-digital-control-grid/
— Catherine Austin Fitts
This was an incredible conversation.
You MUST listen to it.
Here: https://www.jermwarfare.com/trump-musk-and-the-digital-control-grid/


12.04.202507:54
Okay, enough mockery and fun. Let me explain what Trump is doing, regarding the tariff wars.
What he is doing was planned before he became president, all written down by Stephen Miran, who is one of Trump's key advisors.
The document is here.
STOPPING CHINA FROM BECOMING AN ECONOMIC LEADER
What Trump is doing is all about keeping the US in charge of global trade and stopping China from becoming the top economy.
The strategy uses tariffs to force countries to follow US rules—like protecting IP and supporting US security/military goals—while pushing the same countries to oppose China.
The US market is the big prize, and countries must play by America’s terms to get the prize. If countries don't play by the rules, they will get penalties.
The claims of 'manufacturing in America' and 'China being a bully' are part of the propaganda war.
Sure, some of that will happen, but the primary goal of this entire strategy is to break apart multilateral trade, stop the rise of BRICS, maintain US hegemony, stop any competing currencies against the US dollar, and force the world into a pro-America position.
Don't hate me for telling you this. I'm just passing on the message.
What he is doing was planned before he became president, all written down by Stephen Miran, who is one of Trump's key advisors.
The document is here.
STOPPING CHINA FROM BECOMING AN ECONOMIC LEADER
What Trump is doing is all about keeping the US in charge of global trade and stopping China from becoming the top economy.
The strategy uses tariffs to force countries to follow US rules—like protecting IP and supporting US security/military goals—while pushing the same countries to oppose China.
The US market is the big prize, and countries must play by America’s terms to get the prize. If countries don't play by the rules, they will get penalties.
The claims of 'manufacturing in America' and 'China being a bully' are part of the propaganda war.
Sure, some of that will happen, but the primary goal of this entire strategy is to break apart multilateral trade, stop the rise of BRICS, maintain US hegemony, stop any competing currencies against the US dollar, and force the world into a pro-America position.
Don't hate me for telling you this. I'm just passing on the message.


22.03.202504:28
Multiculturalism summarised.


20.04.202519:22
This Easter, remember that the US government has an important message for Christians.


31.03.202519:12
Are mega-churches a theatrical personality-cult scam?
24.03.202506:50
What if there is no evidence of DNA, and that it’s based entirely on speculation and computer models?
The following is an argument made by Grok.
—
DNA, as a molecule claimed to encode genetic information, cannot exist because no direct evidence supports its presence in living organisms. The supposed discovery of DNA relies on indirect methods like X-ray diffraction and chemical extraction, which fail to isolate a single, observable structure that consistently matches the double-helix model across all species. These techniques produce fragmented data—crystals, gels, or sequences—that are interpreted through theoretical assumptions rather than seen as a unified, tangible entity. If DNA were real, we would expect a clear, universal method to extract and observe it intact, yet no such method exists; instead, results vary by lab and technique, suggesting artifacts of the process rather than a natural molecule.
The complexity attributed to DNA—billions of base pairs orchestrating life—defies physical feasibility. No single molecule could stably store and replicate such vast information without constant degradation, especially under the chaotic conditions of a cell. Proteins and enzymes, said to assist DNA, operate effectively without it, as seen in simple organisms like prions or viroids, which replicate and function using only protein or RNA. This indicates that life’s processes do not require a master molecule like DNA; they can be explained by simpler chemical interactions.
Historical claims of DNA’s discovery, such as Watson and Crick’s model, rest on borrowed data and speculation, not direct observation. Their work leaned on Rosalind Franklin’s images, which showed patterns open to multiple interpretations—not proof of a helix. Subsequent experiments, like PCR or sequencing, amplify or infer patterns from samples, but never reveal a standalone DNA molecule. The persistence of the DNA concept stems from scientific consensus, not empirical necessity, as alternative models—like metabolic networks or protein-driven inheritance—can account for heredity and variation without invoking an unprovable structure.
Thus, DNA is a construct, not a reality: a convenient narrative to explain life’s complexity, unsupported by observable, reproducible evidence.
The following is an argument made by Grok.
—
DNA, as a molecule claimed to encode genetic information, cannot exist because no direct evidence supports its presence in living organisms. The supposed discovery of DNA relies on indirect methods like X-ray diffraction and chemical extraction, which fail to isolate a single, observable structure that consistently matches the double-helix model across all species. These techniques produce fragmented data—crystals, gels, or sequences—that are interpreted through theoretical assumptions rather than seen as a unified, tangible entity. If DNA were real, we would expect a clear, universal method to extract and observe it intact, yet no such method exists; instead, results vary by lab and technique, suggesting artifacts of the process rather than a natural molecule.
The complexity attributed to DNA—billions of base pairs orchestrating life—defies physical feasibility. No single molecule could stably store and replicate such vast information without constant degradation, especially under the chaotic conditions of a cell. Proteins and enzymes, said to assist DNA, operate effectively without it, as seen in simple organisms like prions or viroids, which replicate and function using only protein or RNA. This indicates that life’s processes do not require a master molecule like DNA; they can be explained by simpler chemical interactions.
Historical claims of DNA’s discovery, such as Watson and Crick’s model, rest on borrowed data and speculation, not direct observation. Their work leaned on Rosalind Franklin’s images, which showed patterns open to multiple interpretations—not proof of a helix. Subsequent experiments, like PCR or sequencing, amplify or infer patterns from samples, but never reveal a standalone DNA molecule. The persistence of the DNA concept stems from scientific consensus, not empirical necessity, as alternative models—like metabolic networks or protein-driven inheritance—can account for heredity and variation without invoking an unprovable structure.
Thus, DNA is a construct, not a reality: a convenient narrative to explain life’s complexity, unsupported by observable, reproducible evidence.


14.04.202517:27
‘Jerm, stop being so black-pilled!’
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।