Siberian Tigers
03.04.202515:19
In case you like death metal. First 3 minutes is pure annihilation
https://youtu.be/5Zdg4Sbefg4?si=aMNxdSIFt-gPXbKZ
https://youtu.be/5Zdg4Sbefg4?si=aMNxdSIFt-gPXbKZ
01.04.202507:17
One of my female colleagues stopped visiting a local shooting range after the war began. She says, she hasn't been to the shooting range ever since February, 2022 because she now feels bad about touching weapons
It's interesting how sensitive some people are
It's interesting how sensitive some people are
28.03.202506:43
"The new US deal on Ukraine's resources (if the information in the press about Washington's desire to control almost all mineral countries is confirmed) is certainly colonization in a beautiful wrapper.
But who said that colonization does not provide security? The British Empire, pumping resources out of India, protected it from foreign pretenders.
Trump, who thinks according to the current patterns of the 19th century, knows this very well. "You want security? Well, that suits us just fine"* - that's what he seems to be telling Ukraine.
No one promised sovereignty: but in the logic of the same 19th century, sovereignty must be earned, and today only a few states have it. Ukraine, like any state bordering a great power, is not among them"
By Alexey Naumov
*Here Naumov makes a reference to a Putin's speech in the beginning of the war. The thing is, among many (though, let's be fair, not all) Ukrainians during USSR there was a huge hate towards the communists, for various reasons. You may hate commies for whatever you want but the fact is, communists built about 99% of Ukrainian universities, schools, hospitals, kindergartens, power plants, railroad stations. So, in February 2022 Putin said the following: "You want decommunization? Well, that suits us just fine", hinting that from now on Russian army will be destroying power plants and other objects of infrastructure of Ukraine, which were given to Ukrainians by communists and which Ukrainians took for granted
But who said that colonization does not provide security? The British Empire, pumping resources out of India, protected it from foreign pretenders.
Trump, who thinks according to the current patterns of the 19th century, knows this very well. "You want security? Well, that suits us just fine"* - that's what he seems to be telling Ukraine.
No one promised sovereignty: but in the logic of the same 19th century, sovereignty must be earned, and today only a few states have it. Ukraine, like any state bordering a great power, is not among them"
By Alexey Naumov
*Here Naumov makes a reference to a Putin's speech in the beginning of the war. The thing is, among many (though, let's be fair, not all) Ukrainians during USSR there was a huge hate towards the communists, for various reasons. You may hate commies for whatever you want but the fact is, communists built about 99% of Ukrainian universities, schools, hospitals, kindergartens, power plants, railroad stations. So, in February 2022 Putin said the following: "You want decommunization? Well, that suits us just fine", hinting that from now on Russian army will be destroying power plants and other objects of infrastructure of Ukraine, which were given to Ukrainians by communists and which Ukrainians took for granted
16.03.202511:42
If that is true, then Kelly gave us yet another proof that academic success has little to do with success in business and in politics
15.03.202510:05
"I read quite a lot of both Western and opposition Russian-language analysis regarding the ongoing conflict - to be honest, I am very surprised by the scale of ideological bias and narrow-mindedness of people who claim to provide an impartial analysis.
The events in the Kursk region show this quite well: first, Russian troops liberated almost all the territory occupied by the enemy, apparently encircling a significant contingent of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Then information about the encirclement entered the Russian media space, and was indirectly confirmed by Putin.
When Donald Trump asked him to spare the Ukrainian soldiers who were encircled, his opponents almost unanimously accused him of chewing over Russian propaganda.
Today, NBC is already reporting on the encirclement of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, citing a source in the Pentagon - and here the criticism has diminished.
So the very idea that the US president has access to intelligence and can therefore make statements based on that intelligence seems crazy and impossible to a significant number of observers.
And this is coming from people who claim to be doing serious analysis. A sad observation, really"
Alexey Naumov, Russian International Affairs Council
The events in the Kursk region show this quite well: first, Russian troops liberated almost all the territory occupied by the enemy, apparently encircling a significant contingent of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Then information about the encirclement entered the Russian media space, and was indirectly confirmed by Putin.
When Donald Trump asked him to spare the Ukrainian soldiers who were encircled, his opponents almost unanimously accused him of chewing over Russian propaganda.
Today, NBC is already reporting on the encirclement of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, citing a source in the Pentagon - and here the criticism has diminished.
So the very idea that the US president has access to intelligence and can therefore make statements based on that intelligence seems crazy and impossible to a significant number of observers.
And this is coming from people who claim to be doing serious analysis. A sad observation, really"
Alexey Naumov, Russian International Affairs Council
13.03.202518:22
⬇️ The reason why Russian leaders haven't agreed to ceasefire is because they are afraid that this peace will be just a time out. During this time out Ukraine will be supplied with more weapons and more NATO soldiers (enlisted as mercenaries, of course). And after that the war will resume, with Russia having more casualties. That's why they demand total demilitarization of all Ukraine. That's the logic of our officials.
So, what Putin said is not "No". It is "Yes, but..."
So, what Putin said is not "No". It is "Yes, but..."
03.04.202512:18
"Trump's tariff decision is primarily political.
The free trade regime promoted by America meant the following: Washington tolerated an unfavorable trade balance for itself, allowing other countries to profit from mutual trade. In exchange for this, states followed the political course of the United States.
That is, it is a kind of tax on greatness, which American workers regularly paid, experiencing the closure of factories, the extinction of the cities of the "Rust Belt" and the collapse of the life foundations of entire generations of hereditary factory workers. It was they who, in many ways, brought Trump to power.
This old mode of interaction with the world is alien to him: besides, yesterday's vassals no longer follow Washington's new course. Trump is transferring interaction with other countries to cynical market rails, counting on using American economic power to earn even more.
He believes that before the next election, the economic situation, having faced a short-term shock, will improve, and that wealthier American workers will not only resurrect the country's industry, but will also keep the Republicans in power for many years"
Alexey Naumov
The free trade regime promoted by America meant the following: Washington tolerated an unfavorable trade balance for itself, allowing other countries to profit from mutual trade. In exchange for this, states followed the political course of the United States.
That is, it is a kind of tax on greatness, which American workers regularly paid, experiencing the closure of factories, the extinction of the cities of the "Rust Belt" and the collapse of the life foundations of entire generations of hereditary factory workers. It was they who, in many ways, brought Trump to power.
This old mode of interaction with the world is alien to him: besides, yesterday's vassals no longer follow Washington's new course. Trump is transferring interaction with other countries to cynical market rails, counting on using American economic power to earn even more.
He believes that before the next election, the economic situation, having faced a short-term shock, will improve, and that wealthier American workers will not only resurrect the country's industry, but will also keep the Republicans in power for many years"
Alexey Naumov
29.03.202516:09
Funniest shit I've seen in a month
https://youtu.be/m0i8IBZklZg?si=mS_DXHPMnZztN-CM
https://youtu.be/m0i8IBZklZg?si=mS_DXHPMnZztN-CM
25.03.202518:52
"What we learned after the new meeting between Russia and the US in Saudi Arabia: what matters is not what the media writes.
Formally, the meeting was indeed technical: in fact, it is not surprising that Russia did not want to issue any statements at all, but did so after the White House report. There are few specifics, and it is obvious that this is not all that was discussed over the course of 12 hours.
So far, we have received an agreement on a ceasefire in the Black Sea and a gradual resumption of freedom of navigation there on all sides, subject to the lifting of sanctions from Rosselkhozbank [one of the Russian main banks linked to state agriculture] and its connection to SWIFT, as well as a promise from the US to help Russia return to the global food and fertilizer market. Russia also emphasized that peace initiatives will only come after the sanctions are lifted. This is a substantive, positive result, but far from the main one so far.
In my opinion, something else is important: in fact, a change in the modality of relations in the US-Russia-Ukraine triangle. Zelensky is gradually moving away from all his initial demands: not only there's no talk about moving back Russian army to the borders of 1991 or even 2022. Even the canonical "no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine" has been forgotten. As Simon Schuster wrote in his long article about Zelensky, his maximum program is now, in essence, to convince Trump that Putin is not as good as Trump himself thinks.
Ukraine has been largely put in the role of an object of negotiations: the US negotiates with Russia, and then conveys the results to Ukraine, sometimes taking into account Kiev's counter-wishes. Russia conducts a direct dialogue with the US regarding Ukraine and the security system in Europe: in fact, this is what Putin has been striving for from the very beginning, and this is what now makes us believe that peace is truly possible"
Alexey Naumov
Formally, the meeting was indeed technical: in fact, it is not surprising that Russia did not want to issue any statements at all, but did so after the White House report. There are few specifics, and it is obvious that this is not all that was discussed over the course of 12 hours.
So far, we have received an agreement on a ceasefire in the Black Sea and a gradual resumption of freedom of navigation there on all sides, subject to the lifting of sanctions from Rosselkhozbank [one of the Russian main banks linked to state agriculture] and its connection to SWIFT, as well as a promise from the US to help Russia return to the global food and fertilizer market. Russia also emphasized that peace initiatives will only come after the sanctions are lifted. This is a substantive, positive result, but far from the main one so far.
In my opinion, something else is important: in fact, a change in the modality of relations in the US-Russia-Ukraine triangle. Zelensky is gradually moving away from all his initial demands: not only there's no talk about moving back Russian army to the borders of 1991 or even 2022. Even the canonical "no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine" has been forgotten. As Simon Schuster wrote in his long article about Zelensky, his maximum program is now, in essence, to convince Trump that Putin is not as good as Trump himself thinks.
Ukraine has been largely put in the role of an object of negotiations: the US negotiates with Russia, and then conveys the results to Ukraine, sometimes taking into account Kiev's counter-wishes. Russia conducts a direct dialogue with the US regarding Ukraine and the security system in Europe: in fact, this is what Putin has been striving for from the very beginning, and this is what now makes us believe that peace is truly possible"
Alexey Naumov
16.03.202508:11
"In every brilliant or new human thought, or simply even in every serious human thought that is born in someone's head, there always remains something that cannot be conveyed to other people, even if you write entire volumes and explain your thought for thirty-five years; there will always remain something that will never want to come out from under your skull and will remain with you forever"
Fyodor Dostoevsky
Fyodor Dostoevsky
15.03.202508:45
There's a coworking here in Moscow where you can sit with your laptop and occasionally get tortured by parrots
13.03.202512:59
"In Russia, a consensus has emerged in the militaristic segment of the elite and society that Ukraine can be pushed a bit more [that means getting more from Ukraine during the peace talks - more lands, more political demands etc]. Stopping military action now will be perceived as an attempt to steal an inevitable victory. Putin himself has said many times, including recently, that Russia was only a few months short of victory in World War I. This means [if we try to understand Putin's train of thought] that the main thing now is not to repeat the mistake and to endure.
Russian diplomacy also cannot help but start putting forward its own demands. Now it is being offered to join the ceasefire agreed upon between the United States and Ukraine without Moscow's participation. Even if these conditions were acceptable to it, it would be a matter of honor to put forward its own conditions, because it is impossible to discuss «our war without us».
For Moscow, agreeing to a ceasefire without preconditions means agreeing to a ceasefire on the same terms as Ukraine. Even in the best times for international relations, the Kremlin has suppressed attempts to equate itself with weaker neighbors. He will be even more outraged by such attempts now, when we are talking about equalizing with the most evil and, at the same time, weakened enemy"
Alexander Baunov, a former diplomat of the Russian Federation
Russian diplomacy also cannot help but start putting forward its own demands. Now it is being offered to join the ceasefire agreed upon between the United States and Ukraine without Moscow's participation. Even if these conditions were acceptable to it, it would be a matter of honor to put forward its own conditions, because it is impossible to discuss «our war without us».
For Moscow, agreeing to a ceasefire without preconditions means agreeing to a ceasefire on the same terms as Ukraine. Even in the best times for international relations, the Kremlin has suppressed attempts to equate itself with weaker neighbors. He will be even more outraged by such attempts now, when we are talking about equalizing with the most evil and, at the same time, weakened enemy"
Alexander Baunov, a former diplomat of the Russian Federation
03.04.202511:54
Well, that's still not the dumbest possible political decision
29.03.202511:24
"Russia's new political argument in the discussion on Ukraine: neo-Nazis do not obey Zelensky.
Two examples of this argument in two days
1. Putin said that the influence of Azov neo-Nazis is growing, two corps are currently being formed from them. And in the future, they will be so strong that they will not obey the Ukrainian authorities and will not observe the ceasefire. And that is why a reboot of the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government is needed. And that is why external control is needed for the elections in Ukraine.
2. Peskov said a day later that Russia could withdraw from the ceasefire on strikes on the energy sector, because many units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are not following the order of the Ukrainian president not to strike on the energy sector.
3. That is, it turns out that Russia emphasizes that Zelensky already does not completely control part of the military. And in the future, he will control even less.
4. Apparently, in the near future, based on this, Russia will make some strong political conclusion. And now we see preparations for this conclusion.
5. It turned out surprisingly that if Zelensky was previously blamed for everything, now It turns out that Zelensky is trying to make a truce, but the neo-Nazis are not letting him do it"
From TG channel Markov's logic
Two examples of this argument in two days
1. Putin said that the influence of Azov neo-Nazis is growing, two corps are currently being formed from them. And in the future, they will be so strong that they will not obey the Ukrainian authorities and will not observe the ceasefire. And that is why a reboot of the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government is needed. And that is why external control is needed for the elections in Ukraine.
2. Peskov said a day later that Russia could withdraw from the ceasefire on strikes on the energy sector, because many units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are not following the order of the Ukrainian president not to strike on the energy sector.
3. That is, it turns out that Russia emphasizes that Zelensky already does not completely control part of the military. And in the future, he will control even less.
4. Apparently, in the near future, based on this, Russia will make some strong political conclusion. And now we see preparations for this conclusion.
5. It turned out surprisingly that if Zelensky was previously blamed for everything, now It turns out that Zelensky is trying to make a truce, but the neo-Nazis are not letting him do it"
From TG channel Markov's logic
25.03.202506:25
"I came across some discussions about what drones and the gamification of war do to the human psyche. In fact, this was discussed long before the widespread use of cheap military drones as a result of who knows what. For example, there is a book "The Theory of the Drone" by the French philosopher Gregory Chamayou - it is not about today's drones, but also about the massive American "Predators" that hovered in the skies over the Middle East. There are many interesting observations - for example, how the advent of drones expanded the functions of Bentham's panopticon from "the warden can watch you" to "the digital warden is always watching" (the same can be said about the video surveillance system).
In general, it seems to me that the experience of war can be divided into three main parts. War, which existed from the beginning of time until about the beginning of the last century, involves close contact with the enemy. Close combat means danger: you can kill the enemy, the enemy can kill you. The need to put your own life on the line is a kind of the price for the opportunity to take someone else's life. It is clear that military art has always sought to destroy the enemy with the least danger to oneself, but this danger has never become zero. Ancient horse archers or dragoons of the Modern Era, who had the ability to run from enemy infantry, were still close and bore certain risks.
The advent of long-range artillery revolutionized not only military affairs, but also psychology. People appeared who were relatively safe behind the front line, but at the same time brought death to others (most of the losses in the First World War were due to artillery). However, they were not in close contact with the enemy, fired at designated points and usually did not see the result of their work with their own eyes. That is, they had no experience of danger, but also no experience of killing.
Drones made a new revolution in the psychology of military affairs. Already the American "Predator" allowed you to see quite closely those you would hit with a missile. Modern kamikaze drones provide even closer contact. At the same time, the drone operator, like an artilleryman, is far outside the action zone. That is, the drone operator is a person who experiences the close experience of killing an enemy, like an ancient soldier. But at the same time, he is relatively safe and does not experience the risk that in the old days served as a counterweight"
From the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD
In general, it seems to me that the experience of war can be divided into three main parts. War, which existed from the beginning of time until about the beginning of the last century, involves close contact with the enemy. Close combat means danger: you can kill the enemy, the enemy can kill you. The need to put your own life on the line is a kind of the price for the opportunity to take someone else's life. It is clear that military art has always sought to destroy the enemy with the least danger to oneself, but this danger has never become zero. Ancient horse archers or dragoons of the Modern Era, who had the ability to run from enemy infantry, were still close and bore certain risks.
The advent of long-range artillery revolutionized not only military affairs, but also psychology. People appeared who were relatively safe behind the front line, but at the same time brought death to others (most of the losses in the First World War were due to artillery). However, they were not in close contact with the enemy, fired at designated points and usually did not see the result of their work with their own eyes. That is, they had no experience of danger, but also no experience of killing.
Drones made a new revolution in the psychology of military affairs. Already the American "Predator" allowed you to see quite closely those you would hit with a missile. Modern kamikaze drones provide even closer contact. At the same time, the drone operator, like an artilleryman, is far outside the action zone. That is, the drone operator is a person who experiences the close experience of killing an enemy, like an ancient soldier. But at the same time, he is relatively safe and does not experience the risk that in the old days served as a counterweight"
From the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD
15.03.202517:05
Pavel Durov was released by French court and moved back to Dubai
Not all hope is gone for the freedom of the word
Not all hope is gone for the freedom of the word
14.03.202507:35
- Hi Ил-76 from Ilyushin aircraft factory!
- Hi Doctor Livesey from Treasure Island!
- Hi Doctor Livesey from Treasure Island!
13.03.202509:57
"In domestic politics, over the past three years, war has become the meaning of life, the center of activity and a source of inspiration for the Russian leader, who is tired of all these years of power. It has also become a social lift and a source of self-respect for a significant number of middle-aged and older Russian men"
Alexander Baunov, a former diplomat of the Russian Federation
Alexander Baunov, a former diplomat of the Russian Federation
02.04.202515:26
I've already written that the median salary in Moscow is 80 000 rubles per month. Now look at that billboard from KFC, I took it not long ago. It says, you can earn "до 80 000 р" which is "up to 80 000 rubles". After the employment they probably tell their slaves workers that they're going to earn about 50 000. And 80 000 is achieavable only if you take extra hours, because there's this "up to" written before 80 000. Thus, what these KFC bitches are offering is misleading, though you can't actually call it a fraud
28.03.202510:09
"In Vilnius [the capital of Lithuania, a former Soviet republic], they are "decommunizing" sewer manholes. The process has been going on for more than 12 years and is still not close to completion
The city authorities continue the campaign to remove Soviet inscriptions and symbols from various city infrastructure objects as part of the decommunization policy.
Initially, utility workers promised to remove all the inscriptions more than 12 years ago, by May 1, 2013, but the process turned out to be so difficult for local housing and utilities services that the removal is still ongoing. According to Radior, there are still about 130,000 "Soviet manholes" left in the capital of Lithuania [hell, isn't that huge?]. Residents of the city are even encouraged to report such manholes to the appropriate authorities.
Since 2008, Lithuania has had a ban on the display of Soviet symbols, which applies to rallies, mass events, and everyday situations"
By SVTV
Removing Soviet things? No. Removing Soviet signs? Yes!
The city authorities continue the campaign to remove Soviet inscriptions and symbols from various city infrastructure objects as part of the decommunization policy.
Initially, utility workers promised to remove all the inscriptions more than 12 years ago, by May 1, 2013, but the process turned out to be so difficult for local housing and utilities services that the removal is still ongoing. According to Radior, there are still about 130,000 "Soviet manholes" left in the capital of Lithuania [hell, isn't that huge?]. Residents of the city are even encouraged to report such manholes to the appropriate authorities.
Since 2008, Lithuania has had a ban on the display of Soviet symbols, which applies to rallies, mass events, and everyday situations"
By SVTV
Removing Soviet things? No. Removing Soviet signs? Yes!
16.03.202518:38
"Kursk - there is a discussion about the results of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' invasion of the Kursk region. There are several points of view.
1. Ukraine - officially. It was possible to distract Russian troops from the Kharkov region and from Pokrovsk. And this made it possible to stop the Russian army's advance there
2. Ukraine - unofficially. It was possible to humiliate Putin. There was a bold plan to seize the Kursk NPP, well, it didn't work out, but the plan was correct. It was possible to show the strength of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and, due to this, increase military supplies from the West
3. Russia - officially. This is Zelensky's adventure. It cost the Ukrainian Armed Forces huge losses and it led to successes in the Russian army's offensive in Donbass. Unofficially, they also add: and we will deal with those who allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to break through here later
4. The West - officially. Ukraine has the right to fight anywhere within the framework of the war. That is, Ukraine's right to any aggression against Russia is recognized
5. The West - semi-officially. This is an adventure Zelensky. This is stupid and was not approved by the West. This is Zelensky's personal initiative. From a military point of view, this is a big mistake
6. The West - unofficially. This adventure in the Kursk region has already revealed Zelensky's detachment from reality. And this is a strong blow to the entire propaganda scheme of the West, because for 3 years the West has been saying that only Russia is to blame for this war, because it was Russia that invaded the territory of Ukraine. And suddenly Zelensky invaded the territory of Russia and became like Putin and brought down this entire beautiful structure
7. The Global South - officially. The invasion of the Kursk region and the presence of the Ukrainian army there for more than six months unexpectedly showed Russia's weakness. But the offensive of the Russian army and the restoration of control over the Kursk region showed that Russia is winning after all. Therefore, the peace plan should still be in favor of Russia
8. The political conclusions of major political entities, on which the future depends, will depend on the results of this discussion - which concepts will be established as dominant
So far, the point of view that this is Zelensky's personal adventure and his mistake is winning"
From TG channel Markov's logic
1. Ukraine - officially. It was possible to distract Russian troops from the Kharkov region and from Pokrovsk. And this made it possible to stop the Russian army's advance there
2. Ukraine - unofficially. It was possible to humiliate Putin. There was a bold plan to seize the Kursk NPP, well, it didn't work out, but the plan was correct. It was possible to show the strength of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and, due to this, increase military supplies from the West
3. Russia - officially. This is Zelensky's adventure. It cost the Ukrainian Armed Forces huge losses and it led to successes in the Russian army's offensive in Donbass. Unofficially, they also add: and we will deal with those who allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to break through here later
4. The West - officially. Ukraine has the right to fight anywhere within the framework of the war. That is, Ukraine's right to any aggression against Russia is recognized
5. The West - semi-officially. This is an adventure Zelensky. This is stupid and was not approved by the West. This is Zelensky's personal initiative. From a military point of view, this is a big mistake
6. The West - unofficially. This adventure in the Kursk region has already revealed Zelensky's detachment from reality. And this is a strong blow to the entire propaganda scheme of the West, because for 3 years the West has been saying that only Russia is to blame for this war, because it was Russia that invaded the territory of Ukraine. And suddenly Zelensky invaded the territory of Russia and became like Putin and brought down this entire beautiful structure
7. The Global South - officially. The invasion of the Kursk region and the presence of the Ukrainian army there for more than six months unexpectedly showed Russia's weakness. But the offensive of the Russian army and the restoration of control over the Kursk region showed that Russia is winning after all. Therefore, the peace plan should still be in favor of Russia
8. The political conclusions of major political entities, on which the future depends, will depend on the results of this discussion - which concepts will be established as dominant
So far, the point of view that this is Zelensky's personal adventure and his mistake is winning"
From TG channel Markov's logic
15.03.202511:48
Almost a year has passed since the terrorist attack in Crocus concert hall in Moscow: 143 people got killed, 550 were wounded. It was the biggest terrorist attack in Russia for over 20 years. Russian investigators applied tortures to those Islamic terrorists, making them say where they got their guns and who were their leaders. Some people, including foreigners, approved of applying "special interrogation techniques", while others said it was wrong and inhuman.
Back then the author of the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD released an article, where he thoroughly explained why he approves the use of torture at certain situations but at the same time is against legalizing it. And I've translated it for you.
https://telegra.ph/Why-do-I-approve-of-torture-03-15
Back then the author of the TG channel Whales swimming to a house party with LSD released an article, where he thoroughly explained why he approves the use of torture at certain situations but at the same time is against legalizing it. And I've translated it for you.
https://telegra.ph/Why-do-I-approve-of-torture-03-15
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Endeavour
13.03.202518:22
Ukraine has agreed to the US-proposed ceasefire, but Russia hasn't. Are the same people who two weeks ago were shrieking about how Zelenskyy and EU leaders were "warmongers" callously throwing young men into a "meatgrider" now going to say the same about Putin?
Because if they don't, you should consider their crocodile tears over the loss of life and the rest of their commentary on the Russia-Ukraine War to be worthless.
Because if they don't, you should consider their crocodile tears over the loss of life and the rest of their commentary on the Russia-Ukraine War to be worthless.
11.03.202510:30
This night we had a huge drone attack on Russia - 350 drones were involved at the same time. 18 men got injured, 2 got killed. Looks like Zelensky wanted to show Trump that Ukraine is really powerful, just to improve his position in the current talks in Saudi Arabia. However, it turned out that Russian anti-drone system works better than Ukrainian drone system. So, Zelensky hasn't got any points from this move
दिखाया गया 1 - 24 का 47
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।