
Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"

Труха⚡️Україна

Николаевский Ванёк

Лачен пише

Реальний Київ | Украина

Реальна Війна

Україна Online: Новини | Політика

Телеграмна служба новин - Україна

Резидент

Mohamed Elhamy - محمد إلهامي - English (Unofficial)
This channel is dedicated to translating Mr. Mohamed Elhamy's Telegram posts into English. This is not an official channel.
Read More About the Project:
https://t.me/StrengthOfIslam/12
Check Our Other Channels:
https://t.me/StrengthOfIslam/16
Read More About the Project:
https://t.me/StrengthOfIslam/12
Check Our Other Channels:
https://t.me/StrengthOfIslam/16
TGlist रेटिंग
0
0
प्रकारसार्वजनिक
सत्यापन
असत्यापितविश्वसनीयता
अविश्वसनीयस्थान
भाषाअन्य
चैनल निर्माण की तिथिOct 18, 2024
TGlist में जोड़ा गया
Nov 05, 2024रिकॉर्ड
22.04.202523:59
567सदस्य28.10.202423:59
0उद्धरण सूचकांक27.01.202523:59
14.1Kप्रति पोस्ट औसत दृश्य31.10.202423:59
68प्रति विज्ञापन पोस्ट औसत दृश्य16.01.202523:59
4.65%ER01.02.202523:59
2762.28%ERR11.04.202508:34
ALLAH speaks the truth:
"For indeed, it is not eyes that are blinded, but blinded are the hearts which are within the breasts."
(Surah Al-Hajj 22:46)
"For indeed, it is not eyes that are blinded, but blinded are the hearts which are within the breasts."
(Surah Al-Hajj 22:46)
11.04.202508:37
By the will of ALLAH the Almighty, we resume today the gatherings on the Prophet’s biography (Seerah) after pausing during the blessed month of Ramadan.
We ask ALLAH to make this a righteous, beneficial, and sincere deed solely for HIS noble face.
For those who wish to attend, this is the location of Fahmy Babagan Mosque", where we hold the gathering every Friday between Maghrib and Isha | https://maps.app.goo.gl/U3EqD54Z6UVgXnkX9
And for those whose circumstances prevent them from attending, here is a link to the Seerah gatherings on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqC-34MRMs8&list=PLnpknmCXt_N5X7DKYKcYk5EkyW0-wmyJ0
And do not forget us in your righteous supplications.
We ask ALLAH to make this a righteous, beneficial, and sincere deed solely for HIS noble face.
For those who wish to attend, this is the location of Fahmy Babagan Mosque", where we hold the gathering every Friday between Maghrib and Isha | https://maps.app.goo.gl/U3EqD54Z6UVgXnkX9
And for those whose circumstances prevent them from attending, here is a link to the Seerah gatherings on YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqC-34MRMs8&list=PLnpknmCXt_N5X7DKYKcYk5EkyW0-wmyJ0
And do not forget us in your righteous supplications.
04.04.202521:50
"Just like the Christian Crusaders who pushed back the Muslim armies in the 12th century, the American Crusaders today will need to gather the same courage against the Islamists... Alongside Chinese communists and their global ambitions, Islamism is the most dangerous threat to freedom in the world. It cannot be negotiated with, lived with, or understood-it must be marginalized and crushed."
-U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, in his book "The American Crusade" (2020).
-U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, in his book "The American Crusade" (2020).
11.04.202508:34
A few days ago, the Israeli Minister of War came out claiming they had discovered documents in a tunnel in Gaza. According to them, the Green Movement had requested $500 million from Iran over two years. The text of the document allegedly stated that with this amount, they would change the region’s situation and end this dark era in our nation’s history!
Iran responded by promising assistance but admitted it couldn’t commit to a fixed monthly amount due to its weak economic situation.
As far as I know, the Green Movement has not denied the document’s authenticity at the time of writing this—though this doesn’t necessarily confirm its accuracy. But what concerns me now goes beyond whether the document is real or not.
If we assume the document is real, it means the Green Movement estimated that the price of a major, decisive battle is $500 million.
If we assume it’s fake, and that it’s an Israeli attempt to frame Iran—say, to pin the October 7th attack on them—then this still means the Israeli mind, pretending to think like the Green Movement and its leadership, and mimicking Iran’s response, also estimated that a decisive battle would cost $500 million!
And this is what matters to me now—this $500 million!!
If an experienced movement—or those pretending to think like it—believes that wiping out Israel and ending its era only requires $500 million, pumped into this movement’s efforts… then this, in reality, tells you what a disaster we’re in right now!!
What does this mean?
First and foremost, it means removing this entity is not difficult, not impossible, and not even expensive! $500 million is nothing compared to the budgets of Arab nations. In fact, a few businessmen could easily gather this amount!
It would be laughable to remember that Neymar’s transfer to Saudi Al-Hilal cost $100 million—meaning five players like Neymar could liberate Palestine!!!
It would also be funny to recall that the cost of building Egypt’s new "Monorail" for the Administrative Capital is $4.5 billion—nine times the amount needed to free Palestine!!
And I don’t think you’ll laugh out of bitterness—but rather because "the worst of calamities is that which makes you laugh"—when you remember how Trump took, in one deal from one country, a thousand times this amount ($500 billion)!!
The burning question here is: If these rulers spend such vast sums to protect their thrones, commit endless betrayals just to keep power in their bloodline… then even by pure materialistic logic, spending this money on the Green Movement and similar groups would be cheaper, more effective, and strengthen their global standing!!
Have you ever seen people whom geography and history blessed with martyrdom-ready allies like the Green Movement and its brothers—forces capable of removing an existential threat to the entire region—only for them to turn away, break ALLAH’s covenant and their people’s trust, then betray it all by going to the enemy itself, begging with many times this money just to keep their thrones?!
Let’s leave aside the calculations of faith and the Hereafter for now—let’s just talk purely worldly, pragmatic politics.
Suppose the Green Movement’s estimate—or the estimate of those pretending to think like it—was wrong, and the real cost was $1 billion, or two, or even ten…
How many billions are spent on palaces, entertainment, films, plays, car races, football, singing, rare jewelry, horse and falcon breeds, perfumes, ambergris, camphor… and all sorts of unnecessary luxuries?!
So which is more beneficial, more sensible, and the better path?
To spend a billion or two—or even ten—to build a strong, martyrdom-ready ally that shields you from harm and boosts your power, influence, and prestige?
Or to spend trillions, yet still fail to avoid humiliating public insults from some orange-faced brute—like "I protect his backside" or "Where’s my favorite dictator?"!!
Iran responded by promising assistance but admitted it couldn’t commit to a fixed monthly amount due to its weak economic situation.
As far as I know, the Green Movement has not denied the document’s authenticity at the time of writing this—though this doesn’t necessarily confirm its accuracy. But what concerns me now goes beyond whether the document is real or not.
If we assume the document is real, it means the Green Movement estimated that the price of a major, decisive battle is $500 million.
If we assume it’s fake, and that it’s an Israeli attempt to frame Iran—say, to pin the October 7th attack on them—then this still means the Israeli mind, pretending to think like the Green Movement and its leadership, and mimicking Iran’s response, also estimated that a decisive battle would cost $500 million!
And this is what matters to me now—this $500 million!!
If an experienced movement—or those pretending to think like it—believes that wiping out Israel and ending its era only requires $500 million, pumped into this movement’s efforts… then this, in reality, tells you what a disaster we’re in right now!!
What does this mean?
First and foremost, it means removing this entity is not difficult, not impossible, and not even expensive! $500 million is nothing compared to the budgets of Arab nations. In fact, a few businessmen could easily gather this amount!
It would be laughable to remember that Neymar’s transfer to Saudi Al-Hilal cost $100 million—meaning five players like Neymar could liberate Palestine!!!
It would also be funny to recall that the cost of building Egypt’s new "Monorail" for the Administrative Capital is $4.5 billion—nine times the amount needed to free Palestine!!
And I don’t think you’ll laugh out of bitterness—but rather because "the worst of calamities is that which makes you laugh"—when you remember how Trump took, in one deal from one country, a thousand times this amount ($500 billion)!!
The burning question here is: If these rulers spend such vast sums to protect their thrones, commit endless betrayals just to keep power in their bloodline… then even by pure materialistic logic, spending this money on the Green Movement and similar groups would be cheaper, more effective, and strengthen their global standing!!
Have you ever seen people whom geography and history blessed with martyrdom-ready allies like the Green Movement and its brothers—forces capable of removing an existential threat to the entire region—only for them to turn away, break ALLAH’s covenant and their people’s trust, then betray it all by going to the enemy itself, begging with many times this money just to keep their thrones?!
Let’s leave aside the calculations of faith and the Hereafter for now—let’s just talk purely worldly, pragmatic politics.
Suppose the Green Movement’s estimate—or the estimate of those pretending to think like it—was wrong, and the real cost was $1 billion, or two, or even ten…
How many billions are spent on palaces, entertainment, films, plays, car races, football, singing, rare jewelry, horse and falcon breeds, perfumes, ambergris, camphor… and all sorts of unnecessary luxuries?!
So which is more beneficial, more sensible, and the better path?
To spend a billion or two—or even ten—to build a strong, martyrdom-ready ally that shields you from harm and boosts your power, influence, and prestige?
Or to spend trillions, yet still fail to avoid humiliating public insults from some orange-faced brute—like "I protect his backside" or "Where’s my favorite dictator?"!!
10.04.202515:17
From the episode "قصة فلسطين | 3. المقاومة العثمانية للدولة الصهيونية":
In 1308 AH—which corresponds to 1891 CE—the Sultan ordered his ministry to refuse acceptance of Jewish immigrants expelled from Europe, to refuse receiving them in Ottoman territories because—and this is written verbatim—as he said: "This will lead to the formation of a Mosaic government." And he says: "In this matter are many intrigues."
In the same year, Abdul Hamid reaffirmed this decision when he wrote a letter to the Military Committee, saying that "accepting these Mosaics—meaning Jews—and housing them or giving them citizenship rights is very harmful, in the future a matter of a Mosaic government"—meaning a Jewish state—"may arise from this."
In Dhu al-Qi'dah of the same year, Abdul Hamid once again affirmed—as appears in Ottoman documents—these decisions, and rejected the position of Western countries that condemned the Ottomans' refusal to accept Jewish immigrants. Abdul Hamid says: "These Mosaics, if settled in any other part of the Ottoman Empire, will infiltrate into Palestine little by little." Therefore, he says: "Whatever measures are taken, and they will seek to form a Mosaic government with the encouragement and protection of European countries." Truly penetrating insight! We are talking now about 1891.
And as I told you, whoever looks at the history of the Ottoman Empire at that time sees this issue as a very simple matter compared to other large and great problems.
Watch Full Episode (Arabic).
———————————-
من حلقة "قصة فلسطين | 3. المقاومة العثمانية للدولة الصهيونية":
في 1308 هجرية – والذي يوافق 1891 ميلادية - أمر السلطان وزارته برفض قبول المهاجرين اليهود المطرودين من أوروبا، أن يُرفَض استقبالهم في الديار العثمانية لأنه - وهذا كلام مكتوب بالنص– كما قال: "هذا سيؤدي إلى تشكيل حكومة موسوية". ويقول: "وفي هذا الأمر دسائس كثيرة".
في نفس هذا العام أيضًا أكد عبدالحميد على هذا القرار لما كتب رسالة إلى اللجنة العسكرية، كان يقول إن "قبول هؤلاء الموسويين - يعني اليهود - وإسكانهم أو إعطاؤهم حق المواطنة شيء ضار جدًا، قد يتولد عن هذا في المستقبل مسألة حكومة موسوية" - يعني مسألة دولة يهودية.
في ذي القعدة من نفس هذا العام، أكد عبدالحميد مرة أخرى - كما يظهر في الوثائق العثمانية - على هذه القرارات، ورفض موقف الدول الغربية التي أدانت رفض العثمانيين قبول المهاجرين اليهود. ويقول عبدالحميد: "هؤلاء الموسويون لو أُسكنوا في أي مكان آخر من أجزاء الإمبراطورية العثمانية، فإنهم سيتسللون إلى فلسطين شيئًا فشيئًا". فلذلك يقول: "مهما اتخذت من تدابير، وسيسعون لتشكيل حكومة موسوية بتشجيع وحماية الدول الأوروبية". حقيقة بصيرة نافذة! نحن نتكلم الآن عن 1891.
وهذه كما قلت لكم، من ينظر إلى تاريخ الدولة العثمانية في ذلك الوقت يرى هذه المسألة مسألة بسيطة جدًا أمام مشكلات كبيرة أخرى وعظيمة أخرى.
شاهد الحلقة كاملة (بالعربية).
In 1308 AH—which corresponds to 1891 CE—the Sultan ordered his ministry to refuse acceptance of Jewish immigrants expelled from Europe, to refuse receiving them in Ottoman territories because—and this is written verbatim—as he said: "This will lead to the formation of a Mosaic government." And he says: "In this matter are many intrigues."
In the same year, Abdul Hamid reaffirmed this decision when he wrote a letter to the Military Committee, saying that "accepting these Mosaics—meaning Jews—and housing them or giving them citizenship rights is very harmful, in the future a matter of a Mosaic government"—meaning a Jewish state—"may arise from this."
In Dhu al-Qi'dah of the same year, Abdul Hamid once again affirmed—as appears in Ottoman documents—these decisions, and rejected the position of Western countries that condemned the Ottomans' refusal to accept Jewish immigrants. Abdul Hamid says: "These Mosaics, if settled in any other part of the Ottoman Empire, will infiltrate into Palestine little by little." Therefore, he says: "Whatever measures are taken, and they will seek to form a Mosaic government with the encouragement and protection of European countries." Truly penetrating insight! We are talking now about 1891.
And as I told you, whoever looks at the history of the Ottoman Empire at that time sees this issue as a very simple matter compared to other large and great problems.
Watch Full Episode (Arabic).
———————————-
من حلقة "قصة فلسطين | 3. المقاومة العثمانية للدولة الصهيونية":
في 1308 هجرية – والذي يوافق 1891 ميلادية - أمر السلطان وزارته برفض قبول المهاجرين اليهود المطرودين من أوروبا، أن يُرفَض استقبالهم في الديار العثمانية لأنه - وهذا كلام مكتوب بالنص– كما قال: "هذا سيؤدي إلى تشكيل حكومة موسوية". ويقول: "وفي هذا الأمر دسائس كثيرة".
في نفس هذا العام أيضًا أكد عبدالحميد على هذا القرار لما كتب رسالة إلى اللجنة العسكرية، كان يقول إن "قبول هؤلاء الموسويين - يعني اليهود - وإسكانهم أو إعطاؤهم حق المواطنة شيء ضار جدًا، قد يتولد عن هذا في المستقبل مسألة حكومة موسوية" - يعني مسألة دولة يهودية.
في ذي القعدة من نفس هذا العام، أكد عبدالحميد مرة أخرى - كما يظهر في الوثائق العثمانية - على هذه القرارات، ورفض موقف الدول الغربية التي أدانت رفض العثمانيين قبول المهاجرين اليهود. ويقول عبدالحميد: "هؤلاء الموسويون لو أُسكنوا في أي مكان آخر من أجزاء الإمبراطورية العثمانية، فإنهم سيتسللون إلى فلسطين شيئًا فشيئًا". فلذلك يقول: "مهما اتخذت من تدابير، وسيسعون لتشكيل حكومة موسوية بتشجيع وحماية الدول الأوروبية". حقيقة بصيرة نافذة! نحن نتكلم الآن عن 1891.
وهذه كما قلت لكم، من ينظر إلى تاريخ الدولة العثمانية في ذلك الوقت يرى هذه المسألة مسألة بسيطة جدًا أمام مشكلات كبيرة أخرى وعظيمة أخرى.
شاهد الحلقة كاملة (بالعربية).
07.04.202514:35
From the episode "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين":
it would not have been possible to think about establishing a Jewish state at that time without what Muhammad Ali's policy did in the Levant. Muhammad Ali's policy in the Levant revitalized the idea of returning Jews to Palestine again. Therefore, this dangerous man, this criminal man, is undoubtedly the first paver, if not the first founder of Israel. Had it not been for circumstances—international political circumstances—that were stronger than him, meaning calculations beyond his will, Israel would have emerged fifty years ahead of schedule. We would have seen it emerge in 1901 or 1910, perhaps earlier.
...
This sudden end for Muhammad Ali in the Levant was for reasons beyond his control. This end obstructed the establishment of Israel and obstructed the Jewish projects that were growing strongly in Palestine at that time.
Watch Full Episode (Arabic).
———————————-
من حلقة "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين":
ما كان ممكنًا أن يجري التفكير في إنشاء دولة يهودية في ذلك الوقت لولا ما فعلته سياسة محمد علي في الشام. سياسة محمد علي في الشام أنعشت فكرة إعادة اليهود مرة أخرى إلى فلسطين. لذلك فهذا الرجل الخطير، هذا الرجل المجرم، يعد بلا ريب الممهد الأول، إن لم نقل إنه كان المؤسس الأول لإسرائيل. فلولا الظروف - ظروف السياسة الدولية - كانت أقوى منه، أي كانت الحسابات خارجة عن إرادته، لكانت إسرائيل قد نشأت قبل موعدها بخمسين عامًا. كنا سنراها قد نشأت 1901 أو 1910 مثلًا، وربما قبل ذلك.
...
النهاية المفاجئة لمحمد علي في الشام كانت لأسباب خارجة عن إرادته. هذه النهاية عرقلت قيام إسرائيل وعرقلت المشروعات اليهودية التي كانت تنمو بقوة في فلسطين في ذلك الوقت.
شاهد الحلقة كاملة (بالعربية).
it would not have been possible to think about establishing a Jewish state at that time without what Muhammad Ali's policy did in the Levant. Muhammad Ali's policy in the Levant revitalized the idea of returning Jews to Palestine again. Therefore, this dangerous man, this criminal man, is undoubtedly the first paver, if not the first founder of Israel. Had it not been for circumstances—international political circumstances—that were stronger than him, meaning calculations beyond his will, Israel would have emerged fifty years ahead of schedule. We would have seen it emerge in 1901 or 1910, perhaps earlier.
...
This sudden end for Muhammad Ali in the Levant was for reasons beyond his control. This end obstructed the establishment of Israel and obstructed the Jewish projects that were growing strongly in Palestine at that time.
Watch Full Episode (Arabic).
———————————-
من حلقة "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين":
ما كان ممكنًا أن يجري التفكير في إنشاء دولة يهودية في ذلك الوقت لولا ما فعلته سياسة محمد علي في الشام. سياسة محمد علي في الشام أنعشت فكرة إعادة اليهود مرة أخرى إلى فلسطين. لذلك فهذا الرجل الخطير، هذا الرجل المجرم، يعد بلا ريب الممهد الأول، إن لم نقل إنه كان المؤسس الأول لإسرائيل. فلولا الظروف - ظروف السياسة الدولية - كانت أقوى منه، أي كانت الحسابات خارجة عن إرادته، لكانت إسرائيل قد نشأت قبل موعدها بخمسين عامًا. كنا سنراها قد نشأت 1901 أو 1910 مثلًا، وربما قبل ذلك.
...
النهاية المفاجئة لمحمد علي في الشام كانت لأسباب خارجة عن إرادته. هذه النهاية عرقلت قيام إسرائيل وعرقلت المشروعات اليهودية التي كانت تنمو بقوة في فلسطين في ذلك الوقت.
شاهد الحلقة كاملة (بالعربية).
05.04.202517:15
A translated article from Mr. Mohamed Elhamy's video "قصة فلسطين | 1. من أين تبدأ هذه القصة المعقدة؟ وبماذا تخبرنا الجذور؟" is now available. Titled "The Palestine Story: Understanding the Historical Roots of the Conflict," it explores the complex origins of the Palestine conflict, tracing how Zionism developed, the religious foundations of the struggle, and the Christian-Jewish alliance that shaped modern events in this sacred land.
Read it Here
——————————————————
تمت ترجمة مقال من فيديو الأستاذ محمد إلهامي "قصة فلسطين | 1. من أين تبدأ هذه القصة المعقدة؟ وبماذا تخبرنا الجذور؟" بعنوان "قصة فلسطين: فهم الجذور التاريخية للصراع"، يستكشف المقال الأصول المعقدة للصراع الفلسطيني، متتبعاً كيفية تطور الصهيونية، والأسس الدينية للصراع، والتحالف المسيحي اليهودي الذي شكّل الأحداث المعاصرة في هذه الأرض المقدسة.
يمكنكم قراءة المقال هنا.
Read it Here
——————————————————
تمت ترجمة مقال من فيديو الأستاذ محمد إلهامي "قصة فلسطين | 1. من أين تبدأ هذه القصة المعقدة؟ وبماذا تخبرنا الجذور؟" بعنوان "قصة فلسطين: فهم الجذور التاريخية للصراع"، يستكشف المقال الأصول المعقدة للصراع الفلسطيني، متتبعاً كيفية تطور الصهيونية، والأسس الدينية للصراع، والتحالف المسيحي اليهودي الذي شكّل الأحداث المعاصرة في هذه الأرض المقدسة.
يمكنكم قراءة المقال هنا.
09.04.202508:45
A translated article from Mr. Mohamed Elhamy's video "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين" is now available. Titled "The Palestine Story: The Crucial Ten Years That Revived the Idea of Israel," it examines the pivotal decade (1831-1840) when Muhammad Ali's occupation of the Levant transformed ancient Jewish dreams into political reality, creating conditions that would eventually lead to Israel's establishment as foreign powers began seriously considering a Jewish state in Palestine.
Read it Here.
——————————————————
تمت ترجمة مقال من فيديو الأستاذ محمد إلهامي "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين" بعنوان "قصة فلسطين: السنوات العشر الحاسمة التي أحيت فكرة إسرائيل"، يتناول المقال العقد المحوري (1831-1840) عندما حوّل احتلال محمد علي للشام الأحلام اليهودية القديمة إلى واقع سياسي، مما خلق الظروف التي أدت في النهاية إلى إنشاء إسرائيل حيث بدأت القوى الأجنبية تفكر بجدية في إقامة دولة يهودية في فلسطين.
يمكنكم قراءة المقال هنا.
Read it Here.
——————————————————
تمت ترجمة مقال من فيديو الأستاذ محمد إلهامي "قصة فلسطين | 2. عشر سنوات خطيرة وحاسمة في تاريخ فلسطين" بعنوان "قصة فلسطين: السنوات العشر الحاسمة التي أحيت فكرة إسرائيل"، يتناول المقال العقد المحوري (1831-1840) عندما حوّل احتلال محمد علي للشام الأحلام اليهودية القديمة إلى واقع سياسي، مما خلق الظروف التي أدت في النهاية إلى إنشاء إسرائيل حيث بدأت القوى الأجنبية تفكر بجدية في إقامة دولة يهودية في فلسطين.
يمكنكم قراءة المقال هنا.
11.04.202508:13
Gaza War Diaries & Observations [67]
(Farewell, Imam of Al-Mina)
My acquaintance with Sheikh Abu Al-Baraa Ahmad Al-Safadi spanned over seventeen years, dating back to when we had an educational program with a group of students at Al-Mina Mosque (later known as Al-Hussayna).
He was the imam of the mosque, spending much of his time there. Our program ran from morning until Maghrib, lasting forty days with some of the finest brothers and students. This was before the 2008-2009 war, when Gaza was relatively calm and safe. The mosque overlooked Gaza’s beautiful seashore.
Years later, the mosque was rebuilt thanks to a generous man from the Abu Shreia (Al-Hussayna) family, who named it after himself—on the condition that Sheikh Ahmad remained its imam. And so it was.
That mosque became one of Gaza’s most beautiful, with a stunning garden and a mesmerizing sea view. In summer, people frequented it constantly. Many of my maternal relatives prayed there and lived nearby—until the war destroyed or burned their homes. May ALLAH compensate them in this life and the next.
Sheikh Ahmad was the mosque’s imam, preacher, teacher, and caretaker—until ALLAH took him as a martyr, may HE have mercy on him.
He was devoted to leading prayers, almost never missing them except for unavoidable reasons. A cousin of mine, an inspector at the Ministry of Awqaf, told me he checked around eighty mosques and found none as consistent as Abu Al-Baraa. Those familiar with this field know how rare such dedication is among imams—may ALLAH forgive and pardon.
He lengthened prayers and completed the Quran with the congregation every four months. In Ramadan, he extended Qiyam and recited from memory—a precise Hafiz who rarely made mistakes. He once recited the entire Quran in one sitting (from morning until mid-afternoon) in the Safwat Al-Huffaz 2 project without a single error. My brother, Dr. Abu Malik Muhammad Kullab, tested him, and I attended his completion—may ALLAH accept it.
ALLAH spread love and acceptance for him among people. Many traveled from distant areas to pray behind him and hear his sermons. He was not aligned with any faction, so hearts united around him.
He was dutiful to his mother, caring for her in a flat at Al-Andalus Tower, near the mosque. When the war intensified, he sheltered there with his wife, children, and sister while most fled. They stayed—until ALLAH’s decree was fulfilled.
The tower was bombed, killing them all—except his sister, whom ALLAH spared from the rubble, a witness to Jewish oppression and crimes (may ALLAH curse them).
She later told a relative that the night before his death, Sheikh Ahmad dreamt he would meet ALLAH as a martyr. He purified himself, wore his finest clothes, recited Quran—and that was his last night in this world.
May ALLAH have mercy on you, Abu Al-Baraa, and unite us with you in Paradise among the prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, and the righteous.
— Bassam bin Khalil Al-Safadi
Thursday, 5 Shawwal 1446
(Farewell, Imam of Al-Mina)
My acquaintance with Sheikh Abu Al-Baraa Ahmad Al-Safadi spanned over seventeen years, dating back to when we had an educational program with a group of students at Al-Mina Mosque (later known as Al-Hussayna).
He was the imam of the mosque, spending much of his time there. Our program ran from morning until Maghrib, lasting forty days with some of the finest brothers and students. This was before the 2008-2009 war, when Gaza was relatively calm and safe. The mosque overlooked Gaza’s beautiful seashore.
Years later, the mosque was rebuilt thanks to a generous man from the Abu Shreia (Al-Hussayna) family, who named it after himself—on the condition that Sheikh Ahmad remained its imam. And so it was.
That mosque became one of Gaza’s most beautiful, with a stunning garden and a mesmerizing sea view. In summer, people frequented it constantly. Many of my maternal relatives prayed there and lived nearby—until the war destroyed or burned their homes. May ALLAH compensate them in this life and the next.
Sheikh Ahmad was the mosque’s imam, preacher, teacher, and caretaker—until ALLAH took him as a martyr, may HE have mercy on him.
He was devoted to leading prayers, almost never missing them except for unavoidable reasons. A cousin of mine, an inspector at the Ministry of Awqaf, told me he checked around eighty mosques and found none as consistent as Abu Al-Baraa. Those familiar with this field know how rare such dedication is among imams—may ALLAH forgive and pardon.
He lengthened prayers and completed the Quran with the congregation every four months. In Ramadan, he extended Qiyam and recited from memory—a precise Hafiz who rarely made mistakes. He once recited the entire Quran in one sitting (from morning until mid-afternoon) in the Safwat Al-Huffaz 2 project without a single error. My brother, Dr. Abu Malik Muhammad Kullab, tested him, and I attended his completion—may ALLAH accept it.
ALLAH spread love and acceptance for him among people. Many traveled from distant areas to pray behind him and hear his sermons. He was not aligned with any faction, so hearts united around him.
He was dutiful to his mother, caring for her in a flat at Al-Andalus Tower, near the mosque. When the war intensified, he sheltered there with his wife, children, and sister while most fled. They stayed—until ALLAH’s decree was fulfilled.
The tower was bombed, killing them all—except his sister, whom ALLAH spared from the rubble, a witness to Jewish oppression and crimes (may ALLAH curse them).
She later told a relative that the night before his death, Sheikh Ahmad dreamt he would meet ALLAH as a martyr. He purified himself, wore his finest clothes, recited Quran—and that was his last night in this world.
May ALLAH have mercy on you, Abu Al-Baraa, and unite us with you in Paradise among the prophets, the truthful, the martyrs, and the righteous.
— Bassam bin Khalil Al-Safadi
Thursday, 5 Shawwal 1446
11.04.202508:01
The Doctrine of Annihilation: From Deir Yassin to Shujaiya
After the "Haganah" forces achieved their goal by occupying the strategic village of Al-Qastal, the terrorist organizations "Irgun" and "Stern" decided to attack Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948.
The motives behind the attack on Deir Yassin were many:
- Revenge for the battles of Kfar Etzion and Atarot—even though Deir Yassin had no involvement in either.
- Looting, as Deir Yassin was one of the wealthiest Arab villages.
- Releasing pent-up racial hatred.
Beyond these motives, Yitzhak Levi, then-head of Haganah intelligence in Jerusalem, pointed to another key reason for choosing Deir Yassin:
The Irgun and Stern lacked resources compared to the Haganah and couldn’t carry out large-scale operations. They feared being sidelined in Jewish public opinion and wanted to claim victories.
---
77 years after the Deir Yassin massacre, and amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza since October 2023, the enemy committed a new massacre in Shujaiya, east of Gaza City.
People evacuated their homes in the designated "danger zone" and gathered in what they thought were safer, dilapidated buildings—only for the occupation to bomb them all at once, wiping out an entire residential block with everyone inside.
The martyrs were torn to pieces, with dozens killed instantly. But this time, in the age of "progress" and moral decay—where technology advances as humanity collapses—a brother was able to call his sister from beneath the rubble, minutes before death, hearing his siblings utter their last words before their souls departed. Civil defense workers spoke to the martyrs under the wreckage as they took their final breaths.
But why Shujaiya yesterday?
No real reason—just suspicions. Even Israel’s Channel 14 admitted that the army’s intended target wasn’t even there during the strike.
There is no logical justification for this savagery—because this is the enemy’s doctrine and practice.
In the past, they committed their atrocities away from cameras. Today, they do it live on air, combining advanced technology with primitive extermination, precision airstrikes with random bloodshed.
Nothing has changed since Deir Yassin.
A beast that is never satisfied, a victim holding onto their right, and everything else is just footnotes.
After the "Haganah" forces achieved their goal by occupying the strategic village of Al-Qastal, the terrorist organizations "Irgun" and "Stern" decided to attack Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948.
The motives behind the attack on Deir Yassin were many:
- Revenge for the battles of Kfar Etzion and Atarot—even though Deir Yassin had no involvement in either.
- Looting, as Deir Yassin was one of the wealthiest Arab villages.
- Releasing pent-up racial hatred.
Beyond these motives, Yitzhak Levi, then-head of Haganah intelligence in Jerusalem, pointed to another key reason for choosing Deir Yassin:
The Irgun and Stern lacked resources compared to the Haganah and couldn’t carry out large-scale operations. They feared being sidelined in Jewish public opinion and wanted to claim victories.
---
77 years after the Deir Yassin massacre, and amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza since October 2023, the enemy committed a new massacre in Shujaiya, east of Gaza City.
People evacuated their homes in the designated "danger zone" and gathered in what they thought were safer, dilapidated buildings—only for the occupation to bomb them all at once, wiping out an entire residential block with everyone inside.
The martyrs were torn to pieces, with dozens killed instantly. But this time, in the age of "progress" and moral decay—where technology advances as humanity collapses—a brother was able to call his sister from beneath the rubble, minutes before death, hearing his siblings utter their last words before their souls departed. Civil defense workers spoke to the martyrs under the wreckage as they took their final breaths.
But why Shujaiya yesterday?
No real reason—just suspicions. Even Israel’s Channel 14 admitted that the army’s intended target wasn’t even there during the strike.
There is no logical justification for this savagery—because this is the enemy’s doctrine and practice.
In the past, they committed their atrocities away from cameras. Today, they do it live on air, combining advanced technology with primitive extermination, precision airstrikes with random bloodshed.
Nothing has changed since Deir Yassin.
A beast that is never satisfied, a victim holding onto their right, and everything else is just footnotes.
09.04.202516:40
From My War Readings [45]
("The Summary of Palestine's Story and Zionism" by Mohamed Elhamy)
Books classified under Palestine's history and its cause—along with related topics—are far too numerous to count. In this series, we’ve reviewed some, and by ALLAH’s will, more will follow.
The book we discuss in this episode is by a knowledgeable, well-read writer and historian, known for his deep care for this history and narrative.
The Book’s Purpose
The idea for this book emerged after the war began, when the author sensed the need for a concise work to keep generations connected to their Ummah’s cause and remind them of their duty toward it.
This summary is not written for researchers nor in the style of historians’ works. Rather, it is for those working for this faith, aiming to provide them with a clear understanding of this history’s key lessons and milestones. This purpose shapes its writing style, method, and tone (Introduction, pp. 9-10).
Content & Approach
The book presents a historical narrative of Palestine’s story, covering religious, political, and social dimensions, concluding with:
- Historical & intellectual summaries
- Insights on the international & regional situation
- The state of resistance
It spans modern and contemporary history, from the roots of Zionism to the latest war (Al-Aqsa Flood).
The author excelled in:
✔️ Referencing sources effectively
✔️ Handling narratives with expertise
✔️ Highlighting critical turning points in the conflict
Key Highlights
- The decisive ten years (1831-1841) that revived the idea of the illegitimate state, when the tyrant (Muhammad Ali) seized the Levant, opening it wide for Jews and Christians while marginalizing Muslims.
- The policies of Muhammad Ali were a primary reason for the establishment of this usurping entity—a neglected part of history.
- The book exposes the betrayals of nations, governments, and regimes that sold Palestine cheaply—or for free—to the British and Jews.
A Bitter Reality
Our lands have been destined to witness treachery in its ugliest forms, forcing us to endure its pain—so that ALLAH’s inevitable decree may unfold in us, our enemies, and the traitors behind them.
(“And ALLAH is predominant over HIS affair, but most of the people do not know.”)
Lessons & Takeaways
"Palestine’s history is overflowing with lessons and warnings. The deeper one delves, the more they understand the world’s nature over the past two centuries. It is no exaggeration to say that this cause concentrates the essence of the world’s battles: religious, historical, intellectual, political, and legal." (p. 274)
The author reviews the most important conclusions from his perspective, presenting them skillfully. You may agree or disagree with some, but you will benefit either way, engaging with a conscious mind and honest pen.
May ALLAH grant Dr. Mohamed success, reward him with good, and guide us all to what is right. Ameen, Ameen.
— Bassam bin Khalil Al-Safadi
Thursday, 5 Shawwal 1446
🔗 https://t.me/DBasam
("The Summary of Palestine's Story and Zionism" by Mohamed Elhamy)
Books classified under Palestine's history and its cause—along with related topics—are far too numerous to count. In this series, we’ve reviewed some, and by ALLAH’s will, more will follow.
The book we discuss in this episode is by a knowledgeable, well-read writer and historian, known for his deep care for this history and narrative.
The Book’s Purpose
The idea for this book emerged after the war began, when the author sensed the need for a concise work to keep generations connected to their Ummah’s cause and remind them of their duty toward it.
This summary is not written for researchers nor in the style of historians’ works. Rather, it is for those working for this faith, aiming to provide them with a clear understanding of this history’s key lessons and milestones. This purpose shapes its writing style, method, and tone (Introduction, pp. 9-10).
Content & Approach
The book presents a historical narrative of Palestine’s story, covering religious, political, and social dimensions, concluding with:
- Historical & intellectual summaries
- Insights on the international & regional situation
- The state of resistance
It spans modern and contemporary history, from the roots of Zionism to the latest war (Al-Aqsa Flood).
The author excelled in:
✔️ Referencing sources effectively
✔️ Handling narratives with expertise
✔️ Highlighting critical turning points in the conflict
Key Highlights
- The decisive ten years (1831-1841) that revived the idea of the illegitimate state, when the tyrant (Muhammad Ali) seized the Levant, opening it wide for Jews and Christians while marginalizing Muslims.
- The policies of Muhammad Ali were a primary reason for the establishment of this usurping entity—a neglected part of history.
- The book exposes the betrayals of nations, governments, and regimes that sold Palestine cheaply—or for free—to the British and Jews.
A Bitter Reality
Our lands have been destined to witness treachery in its ugliest forms, forcing us to endure its pain—so that ALLAH’s inevitable decree may unfold in us, our enemies, and the traitors behind them.
(“And ALLAH is predominant over HIS affair, but most of the people do not know.”)
Lessons & Takeaways
"Palestine’s history is overflowing with lessons and warnings. The deeper one delves, the more they understand the world’s nature over the past two centuries. It is no exaggeration to say that this cause concentrates the essence of the world’s battles: religious, historical, intellectual, political, and legal." (p. 274)
The author reviews the most important conclusions from his perspective, presenting them skillfully. You may agree or disagree with some, but you will benefit either way, engaging with a conscious mind and honest pen.
May ALLAH grant Dr. Mohamed success, reward him with good, and guide us all to what is right. Ameen, Ameen.
— Bassam bin Khalil Al-Safadi
Thursday, 5 Shawwal 1446
🔗 https://t.me/DBasam
09.04.202515:42
I continue to witness from our noble brothers and sisters in Gaza such greatness that leaves me humbled and awestruck... They still overwhelm me with their kindness and generosity - favors I could never repay, no matter how hard I might try!
This virtuous and honorable scholar, Bassam Al-Safadi, has graciously blessed me with his attention, intellect and effort by reviewing my book and deeming it worthy of reading, then composing this beautiful written appreciation of it...
How I wish my words were artillery shells and my letters bullets... But for now, this confined and helpless prisoner can only point to the path and its noble leaders - those whom ALLAH has honored by making them most deserving and worthy of it!
May ALLAH reward Sheikh Bassam abundantly, protect him and bless him.
And may ALLAH grant you, our brothers, a near, mighty and triumphant victory. Perhaps ALLAH will decree for us a meeting in a liberated Gaza, in a liberated Cairo, and in a liberated Jerusalem!
This virtuous and honorable scholar, Bassam Al-Safadi, has graciously blessed me with his attention, intellect and effort by reviewing my book and deeming it worthy of reading, then composing this beautiful written appreciation of it...
How I wish my words were artillery shells and my letters bullets... But for now, this confined and helpless prisoner can only point to the path and its noble leaders - those whom ALLAH has honored by making them most deserving and worthy of it!
May ALLAH reward Sheikh Bassam abundantly, protect him and bless him.
And may ALLAH grant you, our brothers, a near, mighty and triumphant victory. Perhaps ALLAH will decree for us a meeting in a liberated Gaza, in a liberated Cairo, and in a liberated Jerusalem!
09.04.202515:20
Reports are increasing about Yemeni groups preparing for a ground war against the Houthis, with Gulf support—and expected American military and logistical backing!
I say this for the sake of ALLAH:
This move at this time is a sin, betrayal, and shortsightedness. Everyone knows this is not for the benefit of the Sunnis or to restore their rights—but rather in the interest of the Zionists and their allies. The Yemenis and every observer know that the Houthis did not truly win or gain control, and that movements like Al-Islah and others would not have suffered such a devastating blow before and after the Houthi coup without Gulf and American collusion.
The future of this expected war has two paths:
1. Either it becomes a long, draining conflict for all of Yemen, or
2. They allow a partial victory over the Houthis, then suddenly withdraw support—disappearing the airstrikes—giving the Houthis a new chance to regroup and prolong the war.
The only winners will be the Zionists, their allies, and their agents!
This will be a bitter, painful, and futile repetition of historical tragedies where Islamic movements were used to serve American and Zionist interests.
It will also mirror Iran’s betrayal when it supported the Americans in occupying Afghanistan and Iraq. Whoever now joins hands with the Americans against the Houthis has fallen into the same pit of treachery—so let them not throw stones at others!
I say this for the sake of ALLAH:
This move at this time is a sin, betrayal, and shortsightedness. Everyone knows this is not for the benefit of the Sunnis or to restore their rights—but rather in the interest of the Zionists and their allies. The Yemenis and every observer know that the Houthis did not truly win or gain control, and that movements like Al-Islah and others would not have suffered such a devastating blow before and after the Houthi coup without Gulf and American collusion.
The future of this expected war has two paths:
1. Either it becomes a long, draining conflict for all of Yemen, or
2. They allow a partial victory over the Houthis, then suddenly withdraw support—disappearing the airstrikes—giving the Houthis a new chance to regroup and prolong the war.
The only winners will be the Zionists, their allies, and their agents!
This will be a bitter, painful, and futile repetition of historical tragedies where Islamic movements were used to serve American and Zionist interests.
It will also mirror Iran’s betrayal when it supported the Americans in occupying Afghanistan and Iraq. Whoever now joins hands with the Americans against the Houthis has fallen into the same pit of treachery—so let them not throw stones at others!
09.04.202507:51
🍂 Our Muslim brothers in Bangladesh smashed the windows of KFC for supporting the Jews in their war of extermination against Muslims in Gaza.
I say: This action of theirs is among the greatest forms of jihad in the path of ALLAH. It is a form of economic jihad—destroying the economic assets of the disbelievers. ALLAH praised the Muslims for destroying the wealth of the Jews, saying:
"...they destroyed their houses by their [own] hands and the hands of the believers..." (Surah Al-Hashr 59:2)
Here, ALLAH commended the Companions for destroying Jewish property, approved their actions, and did not rebuke them—even though the Prophet ﷺ was present.
Abu Dawud narrated in his Sunan from Usama (RA) that the Prophet ﷺ instructed him:
"Attack Ubna in the morning and burn it."
Interestingly, Ubna is a town in Palestine—as if this is a message to Muslims supporting Palestine today that burning and destroying the property of disbelievers is permissible and is a legitimate form of deterrence in Islamic law.
We burn and destroy the property of the Jews and their economic supporters—as an act of worship to ALLAH, and as a deterrent to stop them from aiding the war against Muslims, if it harms them and weakens their support.
And ALLAH is the source of success.
I say: This action of theirs is among the greatest forms of jihad in the path of ALLAH. It is a form of economic jihad—destroying the economic assets of the disbelievers. ALLAH praised the Muslims for destroying the wealth of the Jews, saying:
"...they destroyed their houses by their [own] hands and the hands of the believers..." (Surah Al-Hashr 59:2)
Here, ALLAH commended the Companions for destroying Jewish property, approved their actions, and did not rebuke them—even though the Prophet ﷺ was present.
Abu Dawud narrated in his Sunan from Usama (RA) that the Prophet ﷺ instructed him:
"Attack Ubna in the morning and burn it."
Interestingly, Ubna is a town in Palestine—as if this is a message to Muslims supporting Palestine today that burning and destroying the property of disbelievers is permissible and is a legitimate form of deterrence in Islamic law.
We burn and destroy the property of the Jews and their economic supporters—as an act of worship to ALLAH, and as a deterrent to stop them from aiding the war against Muslims, if it harms them and weakens their support.
And ALLAH is the source of success.
07.04.202514:34
The current U.S. Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, summarized his view of Islam in his 2020 book "American Crusade" by saying:
"Islam is neither a religion of peace nor a religion of violence; it is a religion of submission. The word 'Islam' itself translates into English as "submission"—submission to God (ALLAH), submission to God's Book (Quran), and submission to the life teachings of the God's Prophet, Muhammad (told in the Hadith). To those who follow the religion rigorously, the text of the Quran and the teachings of Muhammad are infallible, inflexible, and unquestionable—making the text of Islam is the real challenge.
Making matters even more complicated, Islam is not just a religion but also a system of governance - based on Sharia law in various forms—a judicial and penal system, and a cultural way of life for devout Muslims; meaning that Islamism, as well as mainstream political Islam, cannot peacefully coexist with any other system of government.
Islamists have a book, a tradition, a leader, and a narrative that has held steady for 1,300 years.
Even America has a long history with Islamism. As my friend and Fox & Friends colleague Brian Kilmeade wrote about in his best seller 'Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates: The Forgotten War That Changed American History,' in the late 1700s, America's merchant ships were under attack by Muslim pirates from North Africa who routinely captured our sailors and held them as slaves.
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were told by diplomats that the attackers believed that 'it was written in the Quran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners... and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.' Adams said: 'We ought not to fight them at all unless we determine to fight them forever.' He was right on all fronts. The United States fought them then and did prevail—and we are still fighting them today."
"Islam is neither a religion of peace nor a religion of violence; it is a religion of submission. The word 'Islam' itself translates into English as "submission"—submission to God (ALLAH), submission to God's Book (Quran), and submission to the life teachings of the God's Prophet, Muhammad (told in the Hadith). To those who follow the religion rigorously, the text of the Quran and the teachings of Muhammad are infallible, inflexible, and unquestionable—making the text of Islam is the real challenge.
Making matters even more complicated, Islam is not just a religion but also a system of governance - based on Sharia law in various forms—a judicial and penal system, and a cultural way of life for devout Muslims; meaning that Islamism, as well as mainstream political Islam, cannot peacefully coexist with any other system of government.
Islamists have a book, a tradition, a leader, and a narrative that has held steady for 1,300 years.
Even America has a long history with Islamism. As my friend and Fox & Friends colleague Brian Kilmeade wrote about in his best seller 'Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates: The Forgotten War That Changed American History,' in the late 1700s, America's merchant ships were under attack by Muslim pirates from North Africa who routinely captured our sailors and held them as slaves.
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were told by diplomats that the attackers believed that 'it was written in the Quran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners... and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.' Adams said: 'We ought not to fight them at all unless we determine to fight them forever.' He was right on all fronts. The United States fought them then and did prevail—and we are still fighting them today."
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।