Human Rights Advocates Australia
Advocates that you can trust on any matter. Fighting for Human Rights.
If you have been discriminated against or treated unjustly, please visit our website www.humanrightsadvocates.com.au
If you have been discriminated against or treated unjustly, please visit our website www.humanrightsadvocates.com.au
TGlist रेटिंग
0
0
प्रकारसार्वजनिक
सत्यापन
असत्यापितविश्वसनीयता
अविश्वसनीयस्थान
भाषाअन्य
चैनल निर्माण की तिथिFeb 07, 2025
TGlist में जोड़ा गया
Oct 07, 2024समूह "Human Rights Advocates Australia" में नवीनतम पोस्ट
06.02.202505:36
Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech.
They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions.
This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down.
The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach.
The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive.
Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression.
Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties.
People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear.
I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue.
These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it.
Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents.
I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple.
There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence.
Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws.
They will only be used to censor you.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16E2Wxe5ZD/
They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions.
This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down.
The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach.
The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive.
Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression.
Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties.
People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear.
I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue.
These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it.
Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents.
I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple.
There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence.
Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws.
They will only be used to censor you.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16E2Wxe5ZD/
14.01.202505:38
❤️ Yes
👍 No
👍 No
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
26.11.202408:59
Even though the two major parties won’t say it, the social media companies will.
For the Online Safety Bill to work Social Media companies “will likely require each app provider to collect personal identification or biometric data from all Australians in order to prevent under 16s from accessing their services,” in what they call an inefficient and burdensome process for everyone.
Not to mention the surveillance opportunities such an identification process will bring.
Governments really need to stay out of our lives. Instead of protecting our private lives the two major parties seem intent on controlling every aspect of it.
Shared - Gerard Rennick
For the Online Safety Bill to work Social Media companies “will likely require each app provider to collect personal identification or biometric data from all Australians in order to prevent under 16s from accessing their services,” in what they call an inefficient and burdensome process for everyone.
Not to mention the surveillance opportunities such an identification process will bring.
Governments really need to stay out of our lives. Instead of protecting our private lives the two major parties seem intent on controlling every aspect of it.
Shared - Gerard Rennick
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
25.11.202422:59
Australians have successfully defeated the Albanese Labor governments plan to legislate racism via the Voice to Parliament, and censorship via the Misinformation Bill. Now its time for the hat-trick and end the introduction of forced digital identity via stealth with their Under 16 Social Media Ban.
Shared - Rukshan
Shared - Rukshan
25.11.202408:59
If you were terminated due to not taking the 'YOU KNOW WHAT', because of religious reasons, please reach out to our team today.
It is important to strike while the iron is hot and with the recent precedent set by a federal jury in Detroit, the time is now.
Contact us for a FREE consultation today - info@humanrightsadvocates.com.au
It is important to strike while the iron is hot and with the recent precedent set by a federal jury in Detroit, the time is now.
Contact us for a FREE consultation today - info@humanrightsadvocates.com.au
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
07.10.202402:16
रिकॉर्ड
07.10.202423:59
12.2K
सदस्य07.10.202423:59
0
उद्धरण सूचकांक12.10.202423:59
680
प्रति पोस्ट औसत दृश्य26.11.202423:59
129
प्रति विज्ञापन पोस्ट औसत दृश्य12.10.202423:59
11.32%
ER31.10.202423:59
5.60%
ERRचैनल परिवर्तन इतिहास
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।