Red Ideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Red Ideologies
21.04.202500:40
British fascist Oswald Mosley was a member of the socialist Fabian Society, an MP for the socialist Labour Party, and said of himself: "I am not, and have never been, a man of the right. My position was on the left and is now in the center of politics."
He was also friends with FDR.
Follow @redideologies
He was also friends with FDR.
Follow @redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Martinez Politix
12.01.202517:14
More economic midwittery from Sewell. He's always dropping these incoherent takes on econ like most NatSucks.
So he says Hitler "didn't nationalize enough" while arguing that he and his ideology aren't communists. So if socialist Hitler was not socialist enough, what does that make him if not a commie who wants to nationalize everything?
Then says "they merely banned arms companies from profitting off the war". If a company can't profit, then it's not a private company, it's a state-run enterprise.
Funny how these NatSucks have no issue with the German State profiting off a war Hitler started on false pretenses by looting and sucking dry every country they invaded, but they're irked if some private German businessman makes a profit off a war Hitler started. They hate "profits" except when the state gets them to finance its war of extermination against Slavic nations.
Clown ideology.
So he says Hitler "didn't nationalize enough" while arguing that he and his ideology aren't communists. So if socialist Hitler was not socialist enough, what does that make him if not a commie who wants to nationalize everything?
Then says "they merely banned arms companies from profitting off the war". If a company can't profit, then it's not a private company, it's a state-run enterprise.
Funny how these NatSucks have no issue with the German State profiting off a war Hitler started on false pretenses by looting and sucking dry every country they invaded, but they're irked if some private German businessman makes a profit off a war Hitler started. They hate "profits" except when the state gets them to finance its war of extermination against Slavic nations.
Clown ideology.
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
25.11.202415:37
Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
02.11.202419:13
Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Red Ideologies
16.04.202514:35
The Nazis kept the Soviet collective farm model in place when they conquered Ukraine. Further proof they were not "saving" anyone from Bolshevism but perpetuating the same system.
The propaganda said this:
> "Before the invasion, the Nazis had professed very different intentions. They were going to "liberate" the Ukraine from the double yoke of Russia and Bolshevism. They were going to set up an independent Ukrainian state and restore the former landlords to their possessions."
But the reality was this:
> "Instead of the "Greater Ukraine" which the Nazis had promised to set up by uniting Ruthenia and Eastern Galicia with the Soviet Ukraine, the Ukrainians saw the former division of their national territory carried still further and apparently perpetuated. Eastern Galicia was incorporated into the Polish Gouvernement General; Ruthenia (Sub-Carpathia) remained in the hands of Hungary; part of the Black Sea coast, including Odessa, was promised, if not actually turned over, to the Rumanians; while the rest of the Soviet Ukraine, now called Reichskommissariat Ukraine, was placed under the jurisdiction of Erich Koch, Gauleiter and Governor of East Prussia. The dream of a united and independent Ukraine was gone."
> "Thus far the Germans have introduced only minor changes, for the sake of efficiency, in the agricultural system. Contrary to expectations, the collective farms have not been abolished, but their managers have been replaced with German commissars or former Ukrainian émigrés."
Source
Follow @redideologies
The propaganda said this:
> "Before the invasion, the Nazis had professed very different intentions. They were going to "liberate" the Ukraine from the double yoke of Russia and Bolshevism. They were going to set up an independent Ukrainian state and restore the former landlords to their possessions."
But the reality was this:
> "Instead of the "Greater Ukraine" which the Nazis had promised to set up by uniting Ruthenia and Eastern Galicia with the Soviet Ukraine, the Ukrainians saw the former division of their national territory carried still further and apparently perpetuated. Eastern Galicia was incorporated into the Polish Gouvernement General; Ruthenia (Sub-Carpathia) remained in the hands of Hungary; part of the Black Sea coast, including Odessa, was promised, if not actually turned over, to the Rumanians; while the rest of the Soviet Ukraine, now called Reichskommissariat Ukraine, was placed under the jurisdiction of Erich Koch, Gauleiter and Governor of East Prussia. The dream of a united and independent Ukraine was gone."
> "Thus far the Germans have introduced only minor changes, for the sake of efficiency, in the agricultural system. Contrary to expectations, the collective farms have not been abolished, but their managers have been replaced with German commissars or former Ukrainian émigrés."
Source
Follow @redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Martinez Politix
26.03.202501:40
NS whining about "muh judeo-bolshevism" is disingenuous crap. Not only was it exaggerated and not believed by Hitler privately, but rooted in hair-splitting nonsense.
Goebbels was an adulterous Marxist degenerate who said the difference between Hitlerism and Communism was "slight". Mussolini said the same, a thoroughbred Marxist himself. They're all rad-socialists themselves who want a Soviet economic system of total state planning and the abolition of private profit. Their beef with "Judeo-Bolsheviks" is nothing more than that they're Jewish and not into Nordicism or whatever, but have the same economic views as them.
The whole thing is a display of political schizophrenia. Socialists condemning other socialists because they're a different ethnicity and nothing more.
"Bolsheviks are bad for killing Russians but Hitler is good for slaughtering millions of Russians in the name of Lebensraum!"
STFU you disingenuous little freaks.
Goebbels was an adulterous Marxist degenerate who said the difference between Hitlerism and Communism was "slight". Mussolini said the same, a thoroughbred Marxist himself. They're all rad-socialists themselves who want a Soviet economic system of total state planning and the abolition of private profit. Their beef with "Judeo-Bolsheviks" is nothing more than that they're Jewish and not into Nordicism or whatever, but have the same economic views as them.
The whole thing is a display of political schizophrenia. Socialists condemning other socialists because they're a different ethnicity and nothing more.
"Bolsheviks are bad for killing Russians but Hitler is good for slaughtering millions of Russians in the name of Lebensraum!"
STFU you disingenuous little freaks.
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
12.01.202512:04
List of quotes from Goebbels proving he was a hardcore Marxist-socialist.
Full article
Full article
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
25.11.202415:37
Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
02.11.202419:11
Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands of cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands of cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Red Ideologies
13.04.202519:49
Rosenberg admits at Nuremberg the plan for Ukraine and the East in general: acquisition of their land for German settlement/expansion and exploitation of their labor. He says that while in Germany top officials publicly declared their contempt of the "inferior" Eastern Slavs, it was unwise to publicly declare such things in the East to not agitate their subjects.
——
MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.
ROSENBERG: Yes.
MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.
Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:
"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."
Then, in the next paragraph, you say:
"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."
Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?
ROSENBERG: This document is correct.
Follow @redideologies
——
MR. DODD: All right, I accept your interpretation; we won't have any trouble about that. Now, will you please look at this document? This is a memorandum found in your files, for your information.
ROSENBERG: Yes.
MR. DODD: You set out there, in the second paragraph, what you call the aim of German politics, notably in the Ukraine, as having been laid down by the Fuehrer. They are, you say, exploitation and mobilization of raw materials, a German settlement in certain regions, no artificial education of the population towards intellectualism, but the preservation of their labor strength; apart from that, an extensive unconcern with the interior affairs.
Then, moving down a little bit-because I don't think it is necessary to read all of it, much of it has been referred to in another document-we come down to the 12th line from the bottom of that paragraph. Beginning at the 14th line:
"After continuous observation of the state of affairs in the Occupied Eastern Territories, I am convinced that German politics may have their own, possibly contemptuous opinion of the qualities of the conquered peoples, but that it is not the mission of German political representatives to proclaim measures and opinions which could eventually reduce the conquered peoples to dull despair instead of promoting the desired utilization of manpower to capacity."
Then, in the next paragraph, you say:
"If at home we had to announce our aims to the whole nation most openly and aggressively, in contrast to the others, the political leaders in the East must remain silent where German policy calls for necessary harshness. They must remain silent as to any derogatory opinions which they may form about the conquered peoples. Yes, a clever German policy may in certain circumstances do more in the German interest through alleviations which do not affect policy and certain humane concessions, than through open, inconsiderate brutality."
Were you honestly expressing your views when you wrote that memorandum on the 16th of March 1942?
ROSENBERG: This document is correct.
Follow @redideologies
25.03.202523:20
NSDAP won elections in Danzig in 1933 and effectively controlled the city by proxy since that time.
The whole "German persecution" narrative was trumped up lies to justify aggression. They already ran the city.
The whole "German persecution" narrative was trumped up lies to justify aggression. They already ran the city.
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
11.12.202412:28
Richard Walther Darré, Reich Minister of Food and Agriculture, called Slavs inferior and advocated confiscating their farms.
@redideologies
@redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Martinez Politix
21.11.202417:17
According to Holodomor website, these were the main perpetrators of the crime:
Stalin (Georgian, Main Perpetrator)
Molotov (Russian)
Kaganovich (Jewish)
Postyshev (Russian)
Kossior ( Polish)
Chubar (Ukrainian)
Khatavevich (Jewish)
That's five non-Jews and two Jews.
Hardly a single group is responsible for this. Soviet Communists are responsible, period, not the particular background of the perps which were varied.
Stalin (Georgian, Main Perpetrator)
Molotov (Russian)
Kaganovich (Jewish)
Postyshev (Russian)
Kossior ( Polish)
Chubar (Ukrainian)
Khatavevich (Jewish)
That's five non-Jews and two Jews.
Hardly a single group is responsible for this. Soviet Communists are responsible, period, not the particular background of the perps which were varied.
02.11.202412:12
Debunking ZH's "Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940"
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
30.03.202515:00
From David Irving:
"By ‘freedom’ the Ukrainians understood that instead of twice they now had to wash only once a month — the Germans with their scrubbing brushes would soon make themselves unpopular there. He as Fuhrer would set up his new administration there after ice cool calculations: what the Slavs might think about it would not put him out one bit. Nobody who ate German bread today got worked up about the fact that in the twelfth century the granaries east of the Elbe were regained by the sword. Here in the east we were repeating a process for a second time not unlike the conquest of America. For climatic reasons alone we could not venture further south than the Crimea" - Hitler's War
"By ‘freedom’ the Ukrainians understood that instead of twice they now had to wash only once a month — the Germans with their scrubbing brushes would soon make themselves unpopular there. He as Fuhrer would set up his new administration there after ice cool calculations: what the Slavs might think about it would not put him out one bit. Nobody who ate German bread today got worked up about the fact that in the twelfth century the granaries east of the Elbe were regained by the sword. Here in the east we were repeating a process for a second time not unlike the conquest of America. For climatic reasons alone we could not venture further south than the Crimea" - Hitler's War
22.03.202522:10
Lebensraum is the Germanic dream of the restoration of the Gothic empire of Germanarich from the Rhine to the Urals or the Gottorp Russian Empire, where most of the landlords were Ostsee Germans and owned millions of Baltic (in the Baltic Governorate) and Russian (in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia) slaves.
There is no doubt that after enslaving the Slavs, the Germans would have turned south and started conquering the sunny Mediterranean lands, paying homage to the Germanic barbarians invading the Roman Empire.
I don't see how the European right can be in favor of Hitler, who was a German socialist who put the Hindu swastika on the German banner, who respected Islam and even reasoned that if the Germans embraced Islam, they would oust the Arabs from ruling positions in the Caliphate and conquer the world by the right of the strong with this “heroic religion”.
There is no doubt that after enslaving the Slavs, the Germans would have turned south and started conquering the sunny Mediterranean lands, paying homage to the Germanic barbarians invading the Roman Empire.
I don't see how the European right can be in favor of Hitler, who was a German socialist who put the Hindu swastika on the German banner, who respected Islam and even reasoned that if the Germans embraced Islam, they would oust the Arabs from ruling positions in the Caliphate and conquer the world by the right of the strong with this “heroic religion”.
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Red Ideologies
27.11.202413:32
Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Exposing Hitler as Zionist
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
14.11.202413:42
This is a typically how neo Nazis respond to the argument/justification of the Nazis attacking so many European nations. So the Nazis had no choice but to invade European nations because of PROXIMITY (Lol)? Such a great reason to invade.
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:Martinez Politix
मीडिया सामग्री तक पहुँच नहीं हो सकी
23.10.202420:31
"But but Hitler hatred central banking maaaan"
So what was Hjalmar Schacht's job? 😂
So what was Hjalmar Schacht's job? 😂
दिखाया गया 1 - 24 का 74
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।