𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
11.05.202512:10
The Jesuits Created the Illuminati
What follows is the most concise and factually accurate recounting of the Jesuitical origin of the Bavarian Illuminati that I have discovered—to date. The excerpt is located in the book Culture & Belief: A Christian Overview of History by Leslie C. Crane.
“By the year 1770 the Jesuit's meddling in the political affairs in France, Spain and Holland caused those countries to petition the Pope to curb the Jesuit Order. In response Pope Clement XIV revoked the authority of the Jesuits in 1773 and took over their properties in Rome. But, while the Jesuits appeared to obey, they, in fact, went underground; continuing with a new form of subversive organization. It was then that they began to operate as the Illuminati. The plan was implemented by one Adam Weishaupt with his publication of a document he called the ‘Constitution of the Order of the Illuminati.’ Beginning in 177[6], Weishaupt organized and took control of a network of Masonic super-lodges which he described now as Illuminated. With these, he intended to train up a cadre of wealthy and militant converts who would eventually conquer the world by infiltrating all of the world's governments. His method was to surround the nominal rulers of each nation, whether they be Kings, Princes or elected office-holders, with his secret agents. He and his successors thus would become the actual rulers of the world while operating from behind a screen of secrecy. As fantastic as this plan then seemed, it has now come close to fulfillment. This is what we call today ‘The Grand Design.’ Modern historians pay slight attention to the life and character of Adam Weishaupt; pretending that the Illuminati movement was long ago and of short duration; that it ended when outlawed by the government of Bavaria in 1785. They imply that Weishaupt was a lone madman; reined in finally by the civil authorities. But who was Adam Weishaupt—really? The answer is that before he began his organization he was a mere 25 year's old Jesuit priest; a junior instructor in Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, in Bavaria, when, quite suddenly, in 1773, he was promoted to a full professorship at that unusually early age. Two years later on May 1st 177[6], (the birthday of Satan/Baal?) and seemingly without any preliminary development, he issued his document entitled ‘The Constitutions’ an organizational plan for the regulation of the Order of the Illuminati. He began to recruit followers from the ranks of the German lesser nobility and from members of ordinary Masonic Lodges. In 1778 he boasted that by then he had enlisted over 1000 followers. Interestingly, all during the 10-year life of the Illuminati movement, 1775-1785, Weishaupt remained a full professor in good standing on the faculty of Ingolstadt University although the nature of his activities must have been well known. The only explanation for this tolerant attitude by the University must be that he was still a Jesuit priest under orders. He was not dismissed from the University until the Bavarian political authorities exposed the Illuminati in 1785. Even then, he was protected. After the official suppression of the Illuminati he suffered no punishment and indeed was offered a pension by the University and given personal asylum at the Court of the Duke of Saxe-Gotha; a brother Illumine. After this he disappeared from the pages of history but presumably continued to direct his followers from, underground, until his death in 1830. (Encyl. Brit. 11th Ed. Vol XIV p.30) It is reported that he ‘returned’ to the Church. (but of course he had never left it.)… From the import of this story what becomes apparent is that the Order of the Illuminati was, in fact, a continuation of the long-standing Jesuitical plan to rule the world by political subversion. It indicates that Adam Weishaupt, SJ. (Ibid. p. 30.) was all the while a leader in advancing this scheme.”
-Culture & Belief: A Christian Overview of History by Leslie C. Crane, pages 99-101
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
What follows is the most concise and factually accurate recounting of the Jesuitical origin of the Bavarian Illuminati that I have discovered—to date. The excerpt is located in the book Culture & Belief: A Christian Overview of History by Leslie C. Crane.
“By the year 1770 the Jesuit's meddling in the political affairs in France, Spain and Holland caused those countries to petition the Pope to curb the Jesuit Order. In response Pope Clement XIV revoked the authority of the Jesuits in 1773 and took over their properties in Rome. But, while the Jesuits appeared to obey, they, in fact, went underground; continuing with a new form of subversive organization. It was then that they began to operate as the Illuminati. The plan was implemented by one Adam Weishaupt with his publication of a document he called the ‘Constitution of the Order of the Illuminati.’ Beginning in 177[6], Weishaupt organized and took control of a network of Masonic super-lodges which he described now as Illuminated. With these, he intended to train up a cadre of wealthy and militant converts who would eventually conquer the world by infiltrating all of the world's governments. His method was to surround the nominal rulers of each nation, whether they be Kings, Princes or elected office-holders, with his secret agents. He and his successors thus would become the actual rulers of the world while operating from behind a screen of secrecy. As fantastic as this plan then seemed, it has now come close to fulfillment. This is what we call today ‘The Grand Design.’ Modern historians pay slight attention to the life and character of Adam Weishaupt; pretending that the Illuminati movement was long ago and of short duration; that it ended when outlawed by the government of Bavaria in 1785. They imply that Weishaupt was a lone madman; reined in finally by the civil authorities. But who was Adam Weishaupt—really? The answer is that before he began his organization he was a mere 25 year's old Jesuit priest; a junior instructor in Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, in Bavaria, when, quite suddenly, in 1773, he was promoted to a full professorship at that unusually early age. Two years later on May 1st 177[6], (the birthday of Satan/Baal?) and seemingly without any preliminary development, he issued his document entitled ‘The Constitutions’ an organizational plan for the regulation of the Order of the Illuminati. He began to recruit followers from the ranks of the German lesser nobility and from members of ordinary Masonic Lodges. In 1778 he boasted that by then he had enlisted over 1000 followers. Interestingly, all during the 10-year life of the Illuminati movement, 1775-1785, Weishaupt remained a full professor in good standing on the faculty of Ingolstadt University although the nature of his activities must have been well known. The only explanation for this tolerant attitude by the University must be that he was still a Jesuit priest under orders. He was not dismissed from the University until the Bavarian political authorities exposed the Illuminati in 1785. Even then, he was protected. After the official suppression of the Illuminati he suffered no punishment and indeed was offered a pension by the University and given personal asylum at the Court of the Duke of Saxe-Gotha; a brother Illumine. After this he disappeared from the pages of history but presumably continued to direct his followers from, underground, until his death in 1830. (Encyl. Brit. 11th Ed. Vol XIV p.30) It is reported that he ‘returned’ to the Church. (but of course he had never left it.)… From the import of this story what becomes apparent is that the Order of the Illuminati was, in fact, a continuation of the long-standing Jesuitical plan to rule the world by political subversion. It indicates that Adam Weishaupt, SJ. (Ibid. p. 30.) was all the while a leader in advancing this scheme.”
-Culture & Belief: A Christian Overview of History by Leslie C. Crane, pages 99-101
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
08.05.202517:17
Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost has been elected as the 267th Antichrist. His Papal name is Leo XIV. He is the first American elected as the Pontifex Maximus. He was previously the superior general of the Augustinian Order.
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
03.05.202503:07
🇺🇸🇻🇦📸 — US President Donald Trump posted an AI generated photo of himself as Roman Catholic Pope.
Eaelier this week, Trump jocked about he himself being a good candidate for the post of Supreme pontiff
🔗 Link:
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114441543826801216
Eaelier this week, Trump jocked about he himself being a good candidate for the post of Supreme pontiff
🔗 Link:
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114441543826801216
23.04.202514:48
Jesuit Georgetown University, the CIA’s Spy Factory (Part Two)
“Another key CIA role is to spread disinformation. Investigators in the 1970s found that over 400 American journalists were secretly either CIA agents or on its payroll, and the agency had secretly set up a wide array of magazines, newspapers and journals and published a huge number of books. This penetration of the media has likely only become more extensive in recent times… Going even further back, President Nixon was known to grumble about his National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger and his ‘Georgetown set.’ Kissinger was a professor at the School of Foreign Service and filled the White House and the State Department with handpicked students he had taught. To this day, the national security state is filled with Georgetown graduates. This includes no less than five living former CIA directors, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, current Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, ex-White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, and arch neoconservative war planner Frank Gaffney (although not all of them attended the SFS). In 2020, Politico reported that Georgetown was also the top feeder school to the State Department. If Georgetown is CIA-U, then it is perhaps unsurprising that In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capitalist wing, is full to the brim with its graduates as well. In-Q-Tel was set up to nurture and sponsor new hi-tech companies that will work with the CIA to provide them with cutting-edge technology… Washington, D.C., is full of spies; the D.C.-based International Spy Museum estimates that there are 10,000 in the city. Locals and tourists alike can even book a walking tour called ‘the spies of Georgetown,’ led by a former CIA officer.”
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“Another key CIA role is to spread disinformation. Investigators in the 1970s found that over 400 American journalists were secretly either CIA agents or on its payroll, and the agency had secretly set up a wide array of magazines, newspapers and journals and published a huge number of books. This penetration of the media has likely only become more extensive in recent times… Going even further back, President Nixon was known to grumble about his National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger and his ‘Georgetown set.’ Kissinger was a professor at the School of Foreign Service and filled the White House and the State Department with handpicked students he had taught. To this day, the national security state is filled with Georgetown graduates. This includes no less than five living former CIA directors, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, current Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, ex-White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, and arch neoconservative war planner Frank Gaffney (although not all of them attended the SFS). In 2020, Politico reported that Georgetown was also the top feeder school to the State Department. If Georgetown is CIA-U, then it is perhaps unsurprising that In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capitalist wing, is full to the brim with its graduates as well. In-Q-Tel was set up to nurture and sponsor new hi-tech companies that will work with the CIA to provide them with cutting-edge technology… Washington, D.C., is full of spies; the D.C.-based International Spy Museum estimates that there are 10,000 in the city. Locals and tourists alike can even book a walking tour called ‘the spies of Georgetown,’ led by a former CIA officer.”
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
17.04.202517:00
George W. Bush, America’s First Catholic President? (Part Two)
Daniel Burke of the Religion News Service, writes the following:
“‘I used to say that there are more Catholics on President Bush’s speechwriting team than any Notre Dame starting lineup in the past half-century,’ said former Bush scribe William McGurn… These Catholics… have for the past eight years been shaping Bush’s speeches, policies and legacy to a degree perhaps unprecedented in U.S. history. In fact, with all due respect to John F. Kennedy, the nation’s first and only Catholic president, some have begun to call the Bush White House the first truly Catholic presidency… ‘I don’t think there’s any question about it,’ said Sen. Rick Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator and a devout Catholic. ‘That’s why I called him the first Catholic president; he’s certainly much more Catholic than Kennedy.’ Recently, others have expressed similar sentiments. Michael Gerson, another former top Bush speechwriter, says the key to understanding Bush’s domestic policy is to see it through the lens of Rome. John DiIulio, Bush’s first director of faith-based initiatives, called the president a ‘closet Catholic’ only half in jest.”
-Is George Bush Leading America’s First Truly Catholic Presidency? by Daniel Burke, Religion News Service, April 15, 2008.
Furthermore, devout Roman Catholic William Donohue, President of the Catholic League, states the following:
“There is enough reason already to wonder whether President Bush is our second Catholic president… There is no doubt that since he became president, Bush has taken up several Catholic causes and met with scores of Catholic leaders… After all, everyone knows that Catholics are the swing vote. Yet there is no public office holder who is working harder to please Catholics than Bush. There is something else going on here beyond the prospects of winning… So is Bush Catholic? His Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives is modeled after Catholic Charities. The speech he gave when he dedicated the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington was profoundly Catholic. His attempt to embrace all Catholics, whether their issue is pro-life or social justice, is evident and on going. Ditto his commitment to Hispanics, a Catholic group too often ignored. As I said, there is something else going on here beyond vote getting. Bush is focused on matters Catholic in a way that John F. Kennedy never was.”
-Is Bush Catholic? by William A. Donahue, the Catholic League.
As it is often said, actions speak louder than words, on April 15th, 2008, President George W. Bush, in a completely unprecedented greeting ceremony, welcomed Pope Benedict XVI upon his arrival to the U.S. on the tarmac. It is the first time any U.S. president has greeted a leader or dignitary of any kind at the base.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Daniel Burke of the Religion News Service, writes the following:
“‘I used to say that there are more Catholics on President Bush’s speechwriting team than any Notre Dame starting lineup in the past half-century,’ said former Bush scribe William McGurn… These Catholics… have for the past eight years been shaping Bush’s speeches, policies and legacy to a degree perhaps unprecedented in U.S. history. In fact, with all due respect to John F. Kennedy, the nation’s first and only Catholic president, some have begun to call the Bush White House the first truly Catholic presidency… ‘I don’t think there’s any question about it,’ said Sen. Rick Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator and a devout Catholic. ‘That’s why I called him the first Catholic president; he’s certainly much more Catholic than Kennedy.’ Recently, others have expressed similar sentiments. Michael Gerson, another former top Bush speechwriter, says the key to understanding Bush’s domestic policy is to see it through the lens of Rome. John DiIulio, Bush’s first director of faith-based initiatives, called the president a ‘closet Catholic’ only half in jest.”
-Is George Bush Leading America’s First Truly Catholic Presidency? by Daniel Burke, Religion News Service, April 15, 2008.
Furthermore, devout Roman Catholic William Donohue, President of the Catholic League, states the following:
“There is enough reason already to wonder whether President Bush is our second Catholic president… There is no doubt that since he became president, Bush has taken up several Catholic causes and met with scores of Catholic leaders… After all, everyone knows that Catholics are the swing vote. Yet there is no public office holder who is working harder to please Catholics than Bush. There is something else going on here beyond the prospects of winning… So is Bush Catholic? His Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives is modeled after Catholic Charities. The speech he gave when he dedicated the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington was profoundly Catholic. His attempt to embrace all Catholics, whether their issue is pro-life or social justice, is evident and on going. Ditto his commitment to Hispanics, a Catholic group too often ignored. As I said, there is something else going on here beyond vote getting. Bush is focused on matters Catholic in a way that John F. Kennedy never was.”
-Is Bush Catholic? by William A. Donahue, the Catholic League.
As it is often said, actions speak louder than words, on April 15th, 2008, President George W. Bush, in a completely unprecedented greeting ceremony, welcomed Pope Benedict XVI upon his arrival to the U.S. on the tarmac. It is the first time any U.S. president has greeted a leader or dignitary of any kind at the base.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
07.04.202500:38
George W. Bush, America’s First Catholic President? | An Excerpt from Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection
In following extract from Anthony J. Hilder’s Free World Film Works documentary, Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection, Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order Austin Ruse speaks at the third annual Catholic National Prayer Breakfast wherein he states that the Bonesman George W. Bush is “the second Catholic President, maybe the first.” I follow this up with a clip from Bush’s April 11th, 2008 interview with Raymond Arroyo in which he expresses that he sees God in the eyes of Pope Benedict XVI!
¹Part of the initiation into Skull & Bones includes kissing the slippered toe of the Pope!
²Which is in accordance with official Catholic doctrine. Approximately a dozen Popes have publicly declared on record the blasphemy that they are God manifest in the flesh!
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In following extract from Anthony J. Hilder’s Free World Film Works documentary, Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection, Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order Austin Ruse speaks at the third annual Catholic National Prayer Breakfast wherein he states that the Bonesman George W. Bush is “the second Catholic President, maybe the first.” I follow this up with a clip from Bush’s April 11th, 2008 interview with Raymond Arroyo in which he expresses that he sees God in the eyes of Pope Benedict XVI!
¹Part of the initiation into Skull & Bones includes kissing the slippered toe of the Pope!
²Which is in accordance with official Catholic doctrine. Approximately a dozen Popes have publicly declared on record the blasphemy that they are God manifest in the flesh!
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
10.05.202514:22
The Jesuits and the Lodge of the Nine Sisters (Part 3) | Jerome Lalande Continued
In continuing the line of thought from my previous post, I must pick up with Lalande’s open praise of the Jesuits. The Jesuit Priest Robert Schwickerath pens the following in his work, Jesuit Education: Its History and Principles Viewed in the Light of Modern Educational Problems, “During the heat of the French Revolution the French astronomer Lalande, who took pride in the title ‘the atheist astronomer’, ventured to write Father Boscovich's eulogy in the ‘Journal of Men of Science’ (February 1792)… Lalande, in his Bibliographie Astronomique, enumerates forty-five Jesuit astronomers and eighty-nine astronomical publications for the short period of 1750-1773. The same author, in the continuation of Montucla's History of Mathematics, pays the following tribute to the Society: ‘Here I must remark to the honor of this learned and cruelly persecuted Society, that in several colleges it possessed observatories, for instance in Marseilles, Avignon, Lyons, etc.¹’” He not only praised the Jesuits in the pursuit of “science” but wrote Jesuit Boscovich’s eulogy. As seen above, he also expressed sympathy for the “cruelly persecuted Society.” What he is referring to is the expulsion of the Jesuits from dozens of countries and city states and the suppression of the Jesuits by the papacy, all of which were justified. This merely shows the Jesuitical mind of Lalande, he is seeing the history of the Jesuit Order through their eyes. Before we progress any further, I must address Lalande’s professed atheism. I contend that Lalande, despite his public statements, was not truly an atheist. Anyone who is familiar with the history of the Jesuits and their extreme oath of induction is aware that the Jesuits and their agents operate according to a chameleon like nature², a Jesuit has a thousand disguises he can readily assume to further the interests of the Order. Lalande’s atheism was a mere facade used to cloak his Jesuitism. One of the reasons we know this to be so is the fact that Lalande was a prominent Freemason. Those who have studied Freemasonry are cognizant of the fact that a chief requirement in order to become a Mason is to hold a belief in a supreme being. Masonry is all about the veneration and worship of “the Grand Architect of the Universe.³” Furthermore, upon the 18th century publication of the Dictionary of Atheists, an ordained Jesuit priest protested to Lalande’s name being included in the tome. We find the situation recorded in The Monthly Magazine or, British Register, Volume XI (1801):
“This pleafantry⁴ has been publifhed in confequence of the appearance of a work, intitled ‘the Dictionary of Atheifts.’
It is pretended that a multitude of protefts have been prefented from a variety of perfons, in oppofition to various names, unjuftly infcribed on the lift of Atheifts.
‘Every reclamation’ (fays the narrator) was fubmitted to deliberation, and here follows the refult of the difcuffion that enfued.'
‘A Jefuit, who petitioned in favour of Jerome Lalande, afferted that he had feen him affifting at mafs, along with the fathers of the company of Jefus at Rome ; and that he had cited, in his Elements of Aftronomy, the following line: ‘Cæli enarrant gloriam Dei⁵,⁶’”
The question then arises, what would the benefit be to the Jesuits of Lalande masquerading as an atheist? The answer is simple; the Enlightenment produced a large amount of atheist and agnostic thought among the elite and intellectuals. In light of this and anticlericalism, the Jesuits sought to propel their scientism into the mainstream via their “atheist”astronomer.
¹Pages 179-180.
²The Diabolical Chameleon Like Nature of the Jesuits.
³Who is not the God of the Bible but rather, as revealed in the higher degrees of Freemasonry, Lucifer.
⁴In antiquated English printing the letters S and F were often used interchangeably.
⁵A Latin quote of Psalm 19:1, the Heavens declare the glory of God.
⁶The Monthly Magazine or, British Register, Volume XI, page 622 (1801)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In continuing the line of thought from my previous post, I must pick up with Lalande’s open praise of the Jesuits. The Jesuit Priest Robert Schwickerath pens the following in his work, Jesuit Education: Its History and Principles Viewed in the Light of Modern Educational Problems, “During the heat of the French Revolution the French astronomer Lalande, who took pride in the title ‘the atheist astronomer’, ventured to write Father Boscovich's eulogy in the ‘Journal of Men of Science’ (February 1792)… Lalande, in his Bibliographie Astronomique, enumerates forty-five Jesuit astronomers and eighty-nine astronomical publications for the short period of 1750-1773. The same author, in the continuation of Montucla's History of Mathematics, pays the following tribute to the Society: ‘Here I must remark to the honor of this learned and cruelly persecuted Society, that in several colleges it possessed observatories, for instance in Marseilles, Avignon, Lyons, etc.¹’” He not only praised the Jesuits in the pursuit of “science” but wrote Jesuit Boscovich’s eulogy. As seen above, he also expressed sympathy for the “cruelly persecuted Society.” What he is referring to is the expulsion of the Jesuits from dozens of countries and city states and the suppression of the Jesuits by the papacy, all of which were justified. This merely shows the Jesuitical mind of Lalande, he is seeing the history of the Jesuit Order through their eyes. Before we progress any further, I must address Lalande’s professed atheism. I contend that Lalande, despite his public statements, was not truly an atheist. Anyone who is familiar with the history of the Jesuits and their extreme oath of induction is aware that the Jesuits and their agents operate according to a chameleon like nature², a Jesuit has a thousand disguises he can readily assume to further the interests of the Order. Lalande’s atheism was a mere facade used to cloak his Jesuitism. One of the reasons we know this to be so is the fact that Lalande was a prominent Freemason. Those who have studied Freemasonry are cognizant of the fact that a chief requirement in order to become a Mason is to hold a belief in a supreme being. Masonry is all about the veneration and worship of “the Grand Architect of the Universe.³” Furthermore, upon the 18th century publication of the Dictionary of Atheists, an ordained Jesuit priest protested to Lalande’s name being included in the tome. We find the situation recorded in The Monthly Magazine or, British Register, Volume XI (1801):
“This pleafantry⁴ has been publifhed in confequence of the appearance of a work, intitled ‘the Dictionary of Atheifts.’
It is pretended that a multitude of protefts have been prefented from a variety of perfons, in oppofition to various names, unjuftly infcribed on the lift of Atheifts.
‘Every reclamation’ (fays the narrator) was fubmitted to deliberation, and here follows the refult of the difcuffion that enfued.'
‘A Jefuit, who petitioned in favour of Jerome Lalande, afferted that he had feen him affifting at mafs, along with the fathers of the company of Jefus at Rome ; and that he had cited, in his Elements of Aftronomy, the following line: ‘Cæli enarrant gloriam Dei⁵,⁶’”
The question then arises, what would the benefit be to the Jesuits of Lalande masquerading as an atheist? The answer is simple; the Enlightenment produced a large amount of atheist and agnostic thought among the elite and intellectuals. In light of this and anticlericalism, the Jesuits sought to propel their scientism into the mainstream via their “atheist”astronomer.
¹Pages 179-180.
²The Diabolical Chameleon Like Nature of the Jesuits.
³Who is not the God of the Bible but rather, as revealed in the higher degrees of Freemasonry, Lucifer.
⁴In antiquated English printing the letters S and F were often used interchangeably.
⁵A Latin quote of Psalm 19:1, the Heavens declare the glory of God.
⁶The Monthly Magazine or, British Register, Volume XI, page 622 (1801)
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Disclose.tv
08.05.202516:15
NOW - White smoke. A new Pope has been chosen.
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
30.04.202516:18
William Donovan, the Founder of the OSS (Predecessor of the CIA) was a Decorated Papal Knight.
Martin A. Lee, the author of The Beast Reawakens: Fascism's Resurgence from Hitler's Spymasters to Today's Neo-Nazi Groups and Right-Wing Extremists, writes the following in an article for Mother Jones:
“One day in July 1944, as the Second World War raged throughout Europe, General William ‘Wild Bill’ Donovan was ushered into an ornate chamber in Vatican City for an audience with Pope Pius XII. Donovan bowed his head reverently as the pontiff intoned a ceremonial prayer in Latin and decorated him with the Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Sylvester, the oldest and most prestigious of papal knighthoods. This award has been given to only 100 other men in history, who ‘by feat of arms, or writings, or outstanding deeds, have spread the Faith, and have safeguarded and championed the Church.’ Although a papal citation of this sort rarely, if ever, states why a person is inducted into the ‘Golden Militia,’ there can be no doubt that Donovan earned his knighthood by virtue of the services he rendered to the Catholic hierarchy in World War II, during which he served as chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the wartime predecessor to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)… Pope Pius’ decoration of Wild Bill Donovan marked the beginning of a long-standing, intimate relation-ship between the Vatican and U.S. intelligence that continues to the present day… Casey [CIA Director] and [Secretary of State] Haig are both members of the Knights of Malta, a legendary Vatican order dating back to the Crusades, when the ‘warrior monks’ served as the military arm of the Catholic church. The knights, in their latter-day incarnation as the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), are a historical anomaly. Although the order has no land mass other than a small headquarters in Rome, this unique papal entity holds the status of nation-state. It mints coins, prints stamps, has its own constitution and issues license plates and passports to an accredited diplomatic corps.”
-Their Will Be Done by Martin A. Lee, Mother Jones Article, July/August 1983 Issue, brackets mine.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Martin A. Lee, the author of The Beast Reawakens: Fascism's Resurgence from Hitler's Spymasters to Today's Neo-Nazi Groups and Right-Wing Extremists, writes the following in an article for Mother Jones:
“One day in July 1944, as the Second World War raged throughout Europe, General William ‘Wild Bill’ Donovan was ushered into an ornate chamber in Vatican City for an audience with Pope Pius XII. Donovan bowed his head reverently as the pontiff intoned a ceremonial prayer in Latin and decorated him with the Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Sylvester, the oldest and most prestigious of papal knighthoods. This award has been given to only 100 other men in history, who ‘by feat of arms, or writings, or outstanding deeds, have spread the Faith, and have safeguarded and championed the Church.’ Although a papal citation of this sort rarely, if ever, states why a person is inducted into the ‘Golden Militia,’ there can be no doubt that Donovan earned his knighthood by virtue of the services he rendered to the Catholic hierarchy in World War II, during which he served as chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the wartime predecessor to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)… Pope Pius’ decoration of Wild Bill Donovan marked the beginning of a long-standing, intimate relation-ship between the Vatican and U.S. intelligence that continues to the present day… Casey [CIA Director] and [Secretary of State] Haig are both members of the Knights of Malta, a legendary Vatican order dating back to the Crusades, when the ‘warrior monks’ served as the military arm of the Catholic church. The knights, in their latter-day incarnation as the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), are a historical anomaly. Although the order has no land mass other than a small headquarters in Rome, this unique papal entity holds the status of nation-state. It mints coins, prints stamps, has its own constitution and issues license plates and passports to an accredited diplomatic corps.”
-Their Will Be Done by Martin A. Lee, Mother Jones Article, July/August 1983 Issue, brackets mine.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
22.04.202523:16
Jesuit Georgetown University, the CIA’s Spy Factory (Part One)
“If you have ever wondered, ‘where do America’s spies come from?’ the answer is quite possibly the Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) at Georgetown University… the school provides the backbone for the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, State Department, and other organs of the national security state… Yet, with more than two dozen ex-CIA officials among its teaching staff, the school tailors its courses towards producing the next generation of analysts, assassins, coup-plotters and economic hitmen, fast-tracking graduates into the upper echelons of the national security state… The CIA has also quietly funded the SFS, as journalist Will Sommer revealed. The agency, based in Langley, VA, secretly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the department’s work, despite Georgetown insisting on its website that this money came from anonymous donations from individuals. Any number of “how to join the CIA” articles suggest studying at the School of Foreign Service, and the university itself leans into its reputation as a spy factory… This Georgetown-to-Langley pipeline is so well-established that the university even published a guide to applying to the agency on its website, filled with useful lists of dos and don’ts. Meanwhile, the School of Foreign Service offers its students the opportunity to hold one-to-one meetings with CIA recruiters, although it notes that these interviews are reserved for students who are not already in contact with the agency themselves… Leon Panetta, who, in addition to being the agency’s chief, was also Secretary of Defense… added that, throughout his time in the national security state, he was surrounded by Georgetown graduates, describing them as: “Talented, young individuals who have been at my side every day for the last four years, at both the CIA and the Pentagon, and I am deeply grateful for their work on behalf of me and on behalf of the nation. And I’m deeply grateful to Georgetown for training such extraordinary public servants…” Although Georgetown presents the organization as a respectable group defending freedom and advancing liberty, since its founding in 1947, the CIA has repeatedly been implicated in many of the worst modern-era crimes against humanity… Gun- and drug-running are also key parts of the CIA’s repertoire…
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“If you have ever wondered, ‘where do America’s spies come from?’ the answer is quite possibly the Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) at Georgetown University… the school provides the backbone for the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, State Department, and other organs of the national security state… Yet, with more than two dozen ex-CIA officials among its teaching staff, the school tailors its courses towards producing the next generation of analysts, assassins, coup-plotters and economic hitmen, fast-tracking graduates into the upper echelons of the national security state… The CIA has also quietly funded the SFS, as journalist Will Sommer revealed. The agency, based in Langley, VA, secretly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the department’s work, despite Georgetown insisting on its website that this money came from anonymous donations from individuals. Any number of “how to join the CIA” articles suggest studying at the School of Foreign Service, and the university itself leans into its reputation as a spy factory… This Georgetown-to-Langley pipeline is so well-established that the university even published a guide to applying to the agency on its website, filled with useful lists of dos and don’ts. Meanwhile, the School of Foreign Service offers its students the opportunity to hold one-to-one meetings with CIA recruiters, although it notes that these interviews are reserved for students who are not already in contact with the agency themselves… Leon Panetta, who, in addition to being the agency’s chief, was also Secretary of Defense… added that, throughout his time in the national security state, he was surrounded by Georgetown graduates, describing them as: “Talented, young individuals who have been at my side every day for the last four years, at both the CIA and the Pentagon, and I am deeply grateful for their work on behalf of me and on behalf of the nation. And I’m deeply grateful to Georgetown for training such extraordinary public servants…” Although Georgetown presents the organization as a respectable group defending freedom and advancing liberty, since its founding in 1947, the CIA has repeatedly been implicated in many of the worst modern-era crimes against humanity… Gun- and drug-running are also key parts of the CIA’s repertoire…
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
04.04.202501:09
Identify the Jesuits | The Simpsons (S33E04)
In this episode clip, Lisa Simpson is tasked with completing a CAPTCHA security test. The test involves identifying specific objects in an array of images. One phase of the test requires Lisa to identify Jesuits, of which she identifies Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Order, Francis Borgia, the third Superior General of the Jesuits, and Pope Francis I, the first overtly Jesuit White Pope.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In this episode clip, Lisa Simpson is tasked with completing a CAPTCHA security test. The test involves identifying specific objects in an array of images. One phase of the test requires Lisa to identify Jesuits, of which she identifies Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Order, Francis Borgia, the third Superior General of the Jesuits, and Pope Francis I, the first overtly Jesuit White Pope.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
08.05.202504:09
The Jesuits and the Lodge of the Nine Sisters (Part 2) | The Lodge’s Jesuit-trained Founder
Upon a further examination of this prestigious Parisian lodge, it is evident that the lodge was altogether a Jesuit creation. Concerning the origins of the Lodge of the Nine Sisters, Christopher Knight and Alan Butler record the statement, “The Nine Sisters Lodge had been the brainchild of Jerome Lalande, who should go on to become one of France’s most famous astronomers and mathematicians.¹” This man, Jerome Lalande, was not only the founder of the lodge but also its first Master, observe: “One Famous Parisian Lodge was explicitly conceived as a vehicle for the Enlightenment: the Nine Sisters… The Lodge’s founder, and first Master, was the leading astronomer Jérôme Lalande.²” That then begs the question, who was this individual by the name of Jerome Lalande? Well, as Elizabeth Connor writes, from his earliest days he desired to be a Jesuit, “At the Jesuit College, where he was a student, he asked his instructors ‘what kept the stars in the sky’ and was so interested in the subject that they predicted that he would one day be a great astronomer³. The boy was Jérôme de Lalande, born July 11, 1732, to parents who thought much about his future and brought him up carefully, particularly in respect to religious practices. He was a precocious child… preparing sermons, which he was allowed to deliver from the pulpit in the chapel, dressed as a little priest in the Jesuit habit. He pronounced these sermons in such an impassioned manner that a brilliant future was forecast for him in the law, the profession his parents had chosen for him… At sixteen, while watching his professor of mathematics at the Jesuit College of Lyon observe the solar eclipse of July 25, 1748, Lalande made up his mind to be an astronomer and to take orders as a Jesuit in order to spend his life in study without worldly distractions. Although his parents were very devout, they… hurried him off to Paris to obtain his degree in the law.⁴”Further, according to the biography posted on a website hosted by the University of St. Andrews, “He studied at the Jesuit College in Lyon and at this stage he nearly decided to join the Jesuit Order. In fact it was his parents who encouraged him to continue his education by going to Paris to study law, which he did. It is somewhat ironical that Lalande, who would later become renowned as an atheist, should have come so close to becoming a Jesuit.⁵” While it appears that Lalande did not become officially ordained as a Jesuit priest, he did however certainly become a Jesuit of the short robe, serving the order primarily through scientism or “science falsely so called.” We can easily deduce this through his continued admiration and praise of the Jesuits (which was mutual) beyond his childhood. For instance, the Jesuit priest and astronomer Roger Boscovich openly praised Lalande’s work in astronomy: “In a 1764 review of Joseph Jerome Lalande’s treatise on astronomy, the renowned Jesuit physicist, Ruggiero Boscovich praised Lalande’s methods of introducing the-amateur viewer to the wonders of the stars…⁶”
To be continued…
¹Somon’s Power Brokers: The Secrets of Freemasonry, the Church, and the Illuminati by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler, pages 230-231.
²The Craft: How Freemasons Made the Modern World by John Dickie, page 91.
³This “prediction” is like that of the Fordham University’s President when he stated, three years before he ran for office, that one day FDR might be president. This is not a prediction, it is a deliberate design. Like FDR, the Jesuits placed Lalande into his position after they discovered his natural born talent and interest in astronomy.
⁴Jerome de Lalande: Eighteenth-Century Champion of Astronomy by Elizabeth Connor, August 1953; printed in the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets, Vol. 6, No. 292, p.330-331.
⁵Joseph-Jérôme Lefrançais de Lalande, the MacTutor Index.
⁶The Changing Face of Erudition: Antiquaries in the Age of the Grand Tour by Tamara Anne Griggs, page 19.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Upon a further examination of this prestigious Parisian lodge, it is evident that the lodge was altogether a Jesuit creation. Concerning the origins of the Lodge of the Nine Sisters, Christopher Knight and Alan Butler record the statement, “The Nine Sisters Lodge had been the brainchild of Jerome Lalande, who should go on to become one of France’s most famous astronomers and mathematicians.¹” This man, Jerome Lalande, was not only the founder of the lodge but also its first Master, observe: “One Famous Parisian Lodge was explicitly conceived as a vehicle for the Enlightenment: the Nine Sisters… The Lodge’s founder, and first Master, was the leading astronomer Jérôme Lalande.²” That then begs the question, who was this individual by the name of Jerome Lalande? Well, as Elizabeth Connor writes, from his earliest days he desired to be a Jesuit, “At the Jesuit College, where he was a student, he asked his instructors ‘what kept the stars in the sky’ and was so interested in the subject that they predicted that he would one day be a great astronomer³. The boy was Jérôme de Lalande, born July 11, 1732, to parents who thought much about his future and brought him up carefully, particularly in respect to religious practices. He was a precocious child… preparing sermons, which he was allowed to deliver from the pulpit in the chapel, dressed as a little priest in the Jesuit habit. He pronounced these sermons in such an impassioned manner that a brilliant future was forecast for him in the law, the profession his parents had chosen for him… At sixteen, while watching his professor of mathematics at the Jesuit College of Lyon observe the solar eclipse of July 25, 1748, Lalande made up his mind to be an astronomer and to take orders as a Jesuit in order to spend his life in study without worldly distractions. Although his parents were very devout, they… hurried him off to Paris to obtain his degree in the law.⁴”Further, according to the biography posted on a website hosted by the University of St. Andrews, “He studied at the Jesuit College in Lyon and at this stage he nearly decided to join the Jesuit Order. In fact it was his parents who encouraged him to continue his education by going to Paris to study law, which he did. It is somewhat ironical that Lalande, who would later become renowned as an atheist, should have come so close to becoming a Jesuit.⁵” While it appears that Lalande did not become officially ordained as a Jesuit priest, he did however certainly become a Jesuit of the short robe, serving the order primarily through scientism or “science falsely so called.” We can easily deduce this through his continued admiration and praise of the Jesuits (which was mutual) beyond his childhood. For instance, the Jesuit priest and astronomer Roger Boscovich openly praised Lalande’s work in astronomy: “In a 1764 review of Joseph Jerome Lalande’s treatise on astronomy, the renowned Jesuit physicist, Ruggiero Boscovich praised Lalande’s methods of introducing the-amateur viewer to the wonders of the stars…⁶”
To be continued…
¹Somon’s Power Brokers: The Secrets of Freemasonry, the Church, and the Illuminati by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler, pages 230-231.
²The Craft: How Freemasons Made the Modern World by John Dickie, page 91.
³This “prediction” is like that of the Fordham University’s President when he stated, three years before he ran for office, that one day FDR might be president. This is not a prediction, it is a deliberate design. Like FDR, the Jesuits placed Lalande into his position after they discovered his natural born talent and interest in astronomy.
⁴Jerome de Lalande: Eighteenth-Century Champion of Astronomy by Elizabeth Connor, August 1953; printed in the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets, Vol. 6, No. 292, p.330-331.
⁵Joseph-Jérôme Lefrançais de Lalande, the MacTutor Index.
⁶The Changing Face of Erudition: Antiquaries in the Age of the Grand Tour by Tamara Anne Griggs, page 19.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
29.04.202520:15
The Founder of the Predecessor to the CIA was a Well-trained Jesuit
Dino Garner a former biophysicist, Army Ranger, military aviation photographer, and New York Times bestselling ghostwriter/editor wrote the following for SOFREP, the "Special Operations Forces Report,” a media group focused on military and special operations content, featuring stories, analysis, and podcasts by former military veterans and Special Ops personnel:
“Hands down, the greatest underground special-operations unit ever was the Office of Strategic Services, the OSS, designed and built by Major General William ‘Wild Bill’ Donovan… Books have been written about Donovan’s exploits, first a Wall Street lawyer and businessman, then advisor to high-level politicians, a heroic warfighter, and finally the architect and driving force behind the OSS. What those books don’t share is that Donovan was a well-trained Irish-Jesuit who played dirty at nearly every turn, even on Wall Street… His tactics and strategies were second to none, simply because the Jesuits use a no-holds-barred approach to fighting their enemies… The guys who wrote Donovan’s field manuals weren’t typical military researchers/writers. They were also high-ranking Jesuits who’d been trained in the art of warfare all their lives and had special access to every ‘field manual’ in every language. The Jesuit Curia in Rome houses every possible book, document, parchment, etc. on every subject known to humankind.”
-What the OSS Taught us About Modern Warfare by Dino Garner
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Dino Garner a former biophysicist, Army Ranger, military aviation photographer, and New York Times bestselling ghostwriter/editor wrote the following for SOFREP, the "Special Operations Forces Report,” a media group focused on military and special operations content, featuring stories, analysis, and podcasts by former military veterans and Special Ops personnel:
“Hands down, the greatest underground special-operations unit ever was the Office of Strategic Services, the OSS, designed and built by Major General William ‘Wild Bill’ Donovan… Books have been written about Donovan’s exploits, first a Wall Street lawyer and businessman, then advisor to high-level politicians, a heroic warfighter, and finally the architect and driving force behind the OSS. What those books don’t share is that Donovan was a well-trained Irish-Jesuit who played dirty at nearly every turn, even on Wall Street… His tactics and strategies were second to none, simply because the Jesuits use a no-holds-barred approach to fighting their enemies… The guys who wrote Donovan’s field manuals weren’t typical military researchers/writers. They were also high-ranking Jesuits who’d been trained in the art of warfare all their lives and had special access to every ‘field manual’ in every language. The Jesuit Curia in Rome houses every possible book, document, parchment, etc. on every subject known to humankind.”
-What the OSS Taught us About Modern Warfare by Dino Garner
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
19.04.202516:22
Dr. Ruckman on Ancient Baal Worship (Part 2)
Commenting on 1 Kings 16:29-33, he writes, “In this passage… There is no doubt about what kind of religion this is; it is Baal worship, and is warned against throughout the Bible. Notice ‘the grove’ which Ahab builds; it is forbidden in Deuteronomy 16:21–22. This kind of Baal worship is characterized by little statues set up with groves and bushes growing around them. (My! My! I wonder who would do a thing like that!) In 1 Kings 18, let us mark the other characteristics of this Baal worship. In 1 Kings 18:10, notice that the black robed priests who are called ‘father’ (the prophets of Baal) are in close fellowship with the king and queen. They are primarily a political group. (Elijah is the true prophet in the passage, but he is not in good with ‘the powers that be’ at all.) Vatican Imperialism in the Twentieth Century, by Avro Manhattan, Zondervan Publishing Company, New York, 1964, will show you this relationship that the Catholic Church has with politics… These Baal worshippers (1 Kings 18) were in good with the king and the queen. As ‘priests,’ they were not primarily religious; they were political. Their religion was merely ‘a means to an end.’ Notice that they worship Baal (1 Kings 18:25), and their proof of being ‘the one true church’ is fire coming down from heaven to answer their prayers, supposedly. Baal, then, is the ‘god of fire,’ in most religions the sun god. (Astaroth, in the Old Testament, is the moon goddess, ‘the queen of heaven.’ Where have I heard that before? Then, there is Baal, the god of thunder or the god of fire.) The word ‘Baal’ in English eventually becomes ‘bull.’ In 1 Kings 18:26, we read that the worship services of the Baal worshippers last until 12 o’clock noon… In the text, the priests mutilate themselves to get their prayers answered, they do penance, and they cut themselves to try to get an answer to prayer. (This is a common practice in the Philippines, Spain, and Italy to this day, and it is characteristic of demon possession in Mark 5:1–5.) There can be no doubt in the Bible at all about the identification of Baal worshippers, and we can locate them early in history. They have priests who are called ‘father,’ they worship the sun god on Sunday until 12 o’clock noon, and they wear a particular kind of robe called a ‘vestment’ (2 Kings 10:22). ‘Call now, if there be any that will answer thee; and to which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ Job 5:1. You know how this verse applies. Someone is praying to the ‘saints.’ (Job was written 1,500 years before Christ, and here we have this same group of godless Baal worshippers; so when Job gets into trouble, one of his friends asks Job, ‘To which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ This implies that ancient people did pray to dead saints.) ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight’ Job 15:15. Here, we find that this doctrine of ‘calling on the saints’ is corrected. This is a passage that every Catholic should get a hold of as soon as possible. God puts no trust in His saints. God wouldn’t trust St. Jude or St. Christopher as far as you could kick your house with an arthritic left foot. If He had trusted Simon Peter, He would have been disappointed because Simon Peter cursed and swore. If He had trusted Paul, He would have been disappointed because Paul got out of the will of God by going to Jerusalem. If He had trusted Noah, He would have been disappointed because Noah got drunk. If He had trusted Matthew, Mark, and John, He would have been disappointed because they all forsook Him and fled. If He had put His trust in Joseph, He would have been disappointed because Joseph lied about the cup. And don’t you think for a minute that God Almighty trusts ‘blessed John,’ ‘blessed Mary,’ ‘blessed Joseph,’ or ‘blessed John, the Baptist’ any further than you could throw a freight train. He doesn’t, brother. ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.’”
-The Book of Revelation by Peter Ruckman, 221-224
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Commenting on 1 Kings 16:29-33, he writes, “In this passage… There is no doubt about what kind of religion this is; it is Baal worship, and is warned against throughout the Bible. Notice ‘the grove’ which Ahab builds; it is forbidden in Deuteronomy 16:21–22. This kind of Baal worship is characterized by little statues set up with groves and bushes growing around them. (My! My! I wonder who would do a thing like that!) In 1 Kings 18, let us mark the other characteristics of this Baal worship. In 1 Kings 18:10, notice that the black robed priests who are called ‘father’ (the prophets of Baal) are in close fellowship with the king and queen. They are primarily a political group. (Elijah is the true prophet in the passage, but he is not in good with ‘the powers that be’ at all.) Vatican Imperialism in the Twentieth Century, by Avro Manhattan, Zondervan Publishing Company, New York, 1964, will show you this relationship that the Catholic Church has with politics… These Baal worshippers (1 Kings 18) were in good with the king and the queen. As ‘priests,’ they were not primarily religious; they were political. Their religion was merely ‘a means to an end.’ Notice that they worship Baal (1 Kings 18:25), and their proof of being ‘the one true church’ is fire coming down from heaven to answer their prayers, supposedly. Baal, then, is the ‘god of fire,’ in most religions the sun god. (Astaroth, in the Old Testament, is the moon goddess, ‘the queen of heaven.’ Where have I heard that before? Then, there is Baal, the god of thunder or the god of fire.) The word ‘Baal’ in English eventually becomes ‘bull.’ In 1 Kings 18:26, we read that the worship services of the Baal worshippers last until 12 o’clock noon… In the text, the priests mutilate themselves to get their prayers answered, they do penance, and they cut themselves to try to get an answer to prayer. (This is a common practice in the Philippines, Spain, and Italy to this day, and it is characteristic of demon possession in Mark 5:1–5.) There can be no doubt in the Bible at all about the identification of Baal worshippers, and we can locate them early in history. They have priests who are called ‘father,’ they worship the sun god on Sunday until 12 o’clock noon, and they wear a particular kind of robe called a ‘vestment’ (2 Kings 10:22). ‘Call now, if there be any that will answer thee; and to which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ Job 5:1. You know how this verse applies. Someone is praying to the ‘saints.’ (Job was written 1,500 years before Christ, and here we have this same group of godless Baal worshippers; so when Job gets into trouble, one of his friends asks Job, ‘To which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ This implies that ancient people did pray to dead saints.) ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight’ Job 15:15. Here, we find that this doctrine of ‘calling on the saints’ is corrected. This is a passage that every Catholic should get a hold of as soon as possible. God puts no trust in His saints. God wouldn’t trust St. Jude or St. Christopher as far as you could kick your house with an arthritic left foot. If He had trusted Simon Peter, He would have been disappointed because Simon Peter cursed and swore. If He had trusted Paul, He would have been disappointed because Paul got out of the will of God by going to Jerusalem. If He had trusted Noah, He would have been disappointed because Noah got drunk. If He had trusted Matthew, Mark, and John, He would have been disappointed because they all forsook Him and fled. If He had put His trust in Joseph, He would have been disappointed because Joseph lied about the cup. And don’t you think for a minute that God Almighty trusts ‘blessed John,’ ‘blessed Mary,’ ‘blessed Joseph,’ or ‘blessed John, the Baptist’ any further than you could throw a freight train. He doesn’t, brother. ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.’”
-The Book of Revelation by Peter Ruckman, 221-224
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
11.04.202500:43
Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA
“The CIA is the best known of the 17 agencies that comprise the American intelligence community. It has earned itself nicknames like ‘Catholic Intelligence Agency’ and ‘Catholics In Action’. It’s worth exploring why. No official statistics exist on Catholics in the CIA or any other American intelligence agency. But one interesting clue is the relatively high number of Catholics who have served as director of the agency… Some of the most influential directors in CIA history have been Catholic – men such as Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby and William Casey. They were not just casual Catholics. They were devout Mass-goers —in many cases, members of groups like the Knights of Malta… To make sense of Catholics in the CIA, you have to go back to the 1940s, before the agency even existed. Until that decade, the United States did not have a unified intelligence system. Separate branches of the military collected and analysed their own intelligence. That changed with the Office of Strategic Services. This was the CIA’s predecessor, responsible for espionage and sabotage operations during World War II. The OSS was founded and led by General William J Donovan, whom history knows as ‘Wild Bill’. Donovan was born into a poor Irish Catholic family in upstate New York… Wild Bill did not exclusively recruit Catholics; he sought anyone with ability… But many Catholics ended up in the OSS… Catholics were more likely to be trusted and accepted within Donovan’s OSS than in other government agencies… From its earliest stages the OSS was involved with the Catholic Church. Surrounded by the Axis powers, the Vatican was an important intelligence source for Donovan and his spy network. Who better to cultivate sources within the Catholic community than Catholics themselves? Donovan already had extensive contacts within the Church. He was friendly with Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York, a dedicated anti-communist. Cardinal Spellman acted as Donovan’s liaison to other Catholics, including an apostolic delegate in Washington who promised intelligence reports from Catholic diplomats in Europe and Japan… The OSS shut down in 1945, but US intelligence and the Catholic Church remained strongly connected… The last OSS veteran to lead the CIA was Bill Casey, who took control in 1981 after managing Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign… One can only guess how many Catholics are in the CIA now. The agency keeps changing. But for all we know it’s still Catholics In Action.”
-Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA by Robert Wargas, The Catholic Herald, May 5th, 2016.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“The CIA is the best known of the 17 agencies that comprise the American intelligence community. It has earned itself nicknames like ‘Catholic Intelligence Agency’ and ‘Catholics In Action’. It’s worth exploring why. No official statistics exist on Catholics in the CIA or any other American intelligence agency. But one interesting clue is the relatively high number of Catholics who have served as director of the agency… Some of the most influential directors in CIA history have been Catholic – men such as Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby and William Casey. They were not just casual Catholics. They were devout Mass-goers —in many cases, members of groups like the Knights of Malta… To make sense of Catholics in the CIA, you have to go back to the 1940s, before the agency even existed. Until that decade, the United States did not have a unified intelligence system. Separate branches of the military collected and analysed their own intelligence. That changed with the Office of Strategic Services. This was the CIA’s predecessor, responsible for espionage and sabotage operations during World War II. The OSS was founded and led by General William J Donovan, whom history knows as ‘Wild Bill’. Donovan was born into a poor Irish Catholic family in upstate New York… Wild Bill did not exclusively recruit Catholics; he sought anyone with ability… But many Catholics ended up in the OSS… Catholics were more likely to be trusted and accepted within Donovan’s OSS than in other government agencies… From its earliest stages the OSS was involved with the Catholic Church. Surrounded by the Axis powers, the Vatican was an important intelligence source for Donovan and his spy network. Who better to cultivate sources within the Catholic community than Catholics themselves? Donovan already had extensive contacts within the Church. He was friendly with Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York, a dedicated anti-communist. Cardinal Spellman acted as Donovan’s liaison to other Catholics, including an apostolic delegate in Washington who promised intelligence reports from Catholic diplomats in Europe and Japan… The OSS shut down in 1945, but US intelligence and the Catholic Church remained strongly connected… The last OSS veteran to lead the CIA was Bill Casey, who took control in 1981 after managing Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign… One can only guess how many Catholics are in the CIA now. The agency keeps changing. But for all we know it’s still Catholics In Action.”
-Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA by Robert Wargas, The Catholic Herald, May 5th, 2016.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
से पुनः पोस्ट किया:
Southern Nationalism
09.05.202517:20
Quick Facts About the new Pope, Leo XIV (Former Cardinal Robert Prevost) - the first American Pope (originally from Chicago):
1. Cardinal Prevost, in his capacity as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, was instrumental in the elimination of conservative clergy and selecting left leaning priests to be elevated to Bishoprics loyal to Francis' vision.
2. He is extremely tight with higher ranking members of the United Nations and said to have an excellent relationship with UN administrators due to several years of managing the Augustinian NGO.
3. He was instrumental in eliminating the Latin Mass on behalf of Francis.
4. He was opposed to "gender ideology" in 2012, but he has not mentioned anything about it in recent years. He has said that church members should be "free to express who they are" in Church.
5. He essentially wiped out all "right wing" Catholic organizations in Latin America from his role as president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.
6. He was accused of hiding child molesters within church run facilities near schools.
7. He is a major proponent of mass migration and open borders - even having won an award and praise for supporting Venezuelan migrants.
8. He worked closely with George Soros' Open Society Foundations in his missionary capacity and thereafter. "Both Prevost and the Open Society Foundations share a commitment to social justice and supporting those who are marginalized or in need. Prevost's support for Francis's vision of greater openness and reform within the Church, as well as his own advocacy for social issues, aligns with the Open Society Foundations' work."
1. Cardinal Prevost, in his capacity as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, was instrumental in the elimination of conservative clergy and selecting left leaning priests to be elevated to Bishoprics loyal to Francis' vision.
2. He is extremely tight with higher ranking members of the United Nations and said to have an excellent relationship with UN administrators due to several years of managing the Augustinian NGO.
3. He was instrumental in eliminating the Latin Mass on behalf of Francis.
4. He was opposed to "gender ideology" in 2012, but he has not mentioned anything about it in recent years. He has said that church members should be "free to express who they are" in Church.
5. He essentially wiped out all "right wing" Catholic organizations in Latin America from his role as president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.
6. He was accused of hiding child molesters within church run facilities near schools.
7. He is a major proponent of mass migration and open borders - even having won an award and praise for supporting Venezuelan migrants.
8. He worked closely with George Soros' Open Society Foundations in his missionary capacity and thereafter. "Both Prevost and the Open Society Foundations share a commitment to social justice and supporting those who are marginalized or in need. Prevost's support for Francis's vision of greater openness and reform within the Church, as well as his own advocacy for social issues, aligns with the Open Society Foundations' work."
04.05.202520:32
The Jesuits and the Lodge of the Nine Sisters
La Loge des Neuf Sœurs (the Lodge of the Nine Sisters) was an exceedingly significant French Masonic Lodge in 18th Century France. Being affiliated with the Grand Orient of France, the lodge attracted many prominent members such as Jesuit-educated Voltaire, Benjamin Franklin, and the Jesuit-trained advisor to Napoleon, (Catholic Priest) Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès. Abbé Sieyes was not the only Priest who was a member of the lodge, as we shall shortly see. Nicholas de Bonneville, the author of The Jesuits Driven Away from Masonry and Their Dagger Shattered by Freemasons, was a French Freemason and a contemporary of the members of the lodge. In his aforementioned work when writing about the symbology of the Lodge of the Nine Sisters he states the following, “Finally I recognize the Jesuit hand there…¹”When studying the history of this lodge, it is readily apparent that there indeed was a Jesuit hand in it. Several Masonic sources bear witness to this fact. For instance, the Proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the District of Columbia for the Year 1905 enumerates the following when quoting a 1905 issue of the London Globe, “The lodge was that of the Nine Sisters, which then met in the ancient novitiate of the Jesuits, in the Rue de Pot-de-Fer-Saint Sulpice…²”As well as admitting that the lodge originally met at the site of a former Jesuit novitiate, Masonic sources also disclose pertinent facts concerning its membership. For example, the March 26th, 1925 issue of the Scottish Rite News Bureau prints the following statement, “at the time Voltaire was initiated fourteen Roman Catholic Priests, nine of whom were Jesuits, were members of this most cosmopolitan Lodge of the Nine Sisters.” Furthermore, from yet another official Masonic publication we learn of the reason behind the lodge’s seemingly peculiar name. In the International Monthly Magazine, The Masonic Review, Volume 4, No. 1 (May, 1922), the columnist pens, “The Masons of Paris and Vienna visited back and forth. In Paris was the world's most cosmopolitan lodge, that of the ‘Nine Sisters’ (named in honor of nine nuns.)³” Moreover, another notable individual that was a member of the lodge was a man by the name of Joseph-Ignace⁴ Guillotin, the man that the Pope’s decapitation machine is named after. It has long been disputed whether or not Guillotin actually invented the Guillotine. With that being said, what is indisputable is his open advocation of a decapitation machine used for executions. If he did not outright invent the Guillotine, at the very least he popularized and championed the idea of such a machine. What is remarkable about Guillotin is that he was an “ex”-Jesuit Priest turned doctor. Accordingly, Howard Fisher writing for Hekteon International articulates, “Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, M.D. (1738–1814) was an ex-Jesuit priest, a practicing physician, and a politician just before and during the French Revolution.⁵” It is clear from history that unless a man is born again by the spirit of God and is thereby set free from the satanic captivity of the Jesuit Oath, that man, once a Jesuit, is always a Jesuit. Subsequently, the Masonic author William Denslow notes, “Guillotin was one of the founders of the Grand Orient of France, and was first the orator of the Chamber of the Provinces, becoming president on Oct. 27, 1775. He was master of Concorde Fraternelle Lodge of Paris, his name being on the list of that lodge in 1776 with his address as ‘the Schools of Medicine.’ He was also a member of the famous Lodge of the Nine Sisters…⁶”
¹Page 103.
²Page 450.
³See also, The Builder: A Journal of the Masonic Student Published Monthly by the National Masonic Research Society, Index Volume VI, 1920, page 186.
⁴As in Ignatius, the name of the founder of the Jesuit Order.
⁵“A tale of three doctors” by Howard Fischer, Hekteon International - A Journal of Medical Humanities
⁶10,000 Famous Freemasons by William R. Denslow Volume II, pages 152-153.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
La Loge des Neuf Sœurs (the Lodge of the Nine Sisters) was an exceedingly significant French Masonic Lodge in 18th Century France. Being affiliated with the Grand Orient of France, the lodge attracted many prominent members such as Jesuit-educated Voltaire, Benjamin Franklin, and the Jesuit-trained advisor to Napoleon, (Catholic Priest) Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès. Abbé Sieyes was not the only Priest who was a member of the lodge, as we shall shortly see. Nicholas de Bonneville, the author of The Jesuits Driven Away from Masonry and Their Dagger Shattered by Freemasons, was a French Freemason and a contemporary of the members of the lodge. In his aforementioned work when writing about the symbology of the Lodge of the Nine Sisters he states the following, “Finally I recognize the Jesuit hand there…¹”When studying the history of this lodge, it is readily apparent that there indeed was a Jesuit hand in it. Several Masonic sources bear witness to this fact. For instance, the Proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the District of Columbia for the Year 1905 enumerates the following when quoting a 1905 issue of the London Globe, “The lodge was that of the Nine Sisters, which then met in the ancient novitiate of the Jesuits, in the Rue de Pot-de-Fer-Saint Sulpice…²”As well as admitting that the lodge originally met at the site of a former Jesuit novitiate, Masonic sources also disclose pertinent facts concerning its membership. For example, the March 26th, 1925 issue of the Scottish Rite News Bureau prints the following statement, “at the time Voltaire was initiated fourteen Roman Catholic Priests, nine of whom were Jesuits, were members of this most cosmopolitan Lodge of the Nine Sisters.” Furthermore, from yet another official Masonic publication we learn of the reason behind the lodge’s seemingly peculiar name. In the International Monthly Magazine, The Masonic Review, Volume 4, No. 1 (May, 1922), the columnist pens, “The Masons of Paris and Vienna visited back and forth. In Paris was the world's most cosmopolitan lodge, that of the ‘Nine Sisters’ (named in honor of nine nuns.)³” Moreover, another notable individual that was a member of the lodge was a man by the name of Joseph-Ignace⁴ Guillotin, the man that the Pope’s decapitation machine is named after. It has long been disputed whether or not Guillotin actually invented the Guillotine. With that being said, what is indisputable is his open advocation of a decapitation machine used for executions. If he did not outright invent the Guillotine, at the very least he popularized and championed the idea of such a machine. What is remarkable about Guillotin is that he was an “ex”-Jesuit Priest turned doctor. Accordingly, Howard Fisher writing for Hekteon International articulates, “Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, M.D. (1738–1814) was an ex-Jesuit priest, a practicing physician, and a politician just before and during the French Revolution.⁵” It is clear from history that unless a man is born again by the spirit of God and is thereby set free from the satanic captivity of the Jesuit Oath, that man, once a Jesuit, is always a Jesuit. Subsequently, the Masonic author William Denslow notes, “Guillotin was one of the founders of the Grand Orient of France, and was first the orator of the Chamber of the Provinces, becoming president on Oct. 27, 1775. He was master of Concorde Fraternelle Lodge of Paris, his name being on the list of that lodge in 1776 with his address as ‘the Schools of Medicine.’ He was also a member of the famous Lodge of the Nine Sisters…⁶”
¹Page 103.
²Page 450.
³See also, The Builder: A Journal of the Masonic Student Published Monthly by the National Masonic Research Society, Index Volume VI, 1920, page 186.
⁴As in Ignatius, the name of the founder of the Jesuit Order.
⁵“A tale of three doctors” by Howard Fischer, Hekteon International - A Journal of Medical Humanities
⁶10,000 Famous Freemasons by William R. Denslow Volume II, pages 152-153.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
27.04.202523:35
The Jesuits Created Scottish Rite Freemasonry
The Masonic author, William O. Peterson, P.M. 32nd Degree, writes:
“Chevalier de Bonneville formed a chapter of twenty five Degrees of the so-called High-Degrees in the College of Jesuits of Clermont, in Paris in 1754. The adherents of the House of Stuart had made the college of Clermont their asylum, they being mostly Scotchmen. One of these Degrees being the ‘Scottish Master’, the new body organized in Charleston, S.C., in 1801, gave the name of Scottish Rite to these Degrees, which name ever since that time has characterized the Rite all over the world.”
-Masonic Quiz Book “Ask Me Another, Brother,” by William O. Peterson, (Chicago, Illinois: The Charles T. Powner Co., 1951) pp. 194, 195.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Masonic author, William O. Peterson, P.M. 32nd Degree, writes:
“Chevalier de Bonneville formed a chapter of twenty five Degrees of the so-called High-Degrees in the College of Jesuits of Clermont, in Paris in 1754. The adherents of the House of Stuart had made the college of Clermont their asylum, they being mostly Scotchmen. One of these Degrees being the ‘Scottish Master’, the new body organized in Charleston, S.C., in 1801, gave the name of Scottish Rite to these Degrees, which name ever since that time has characterized the Rite all over the world.”
-Masonic Quiz Book “Ask Me Another, Brother,” by William O. Peterson, (Chicago, Illinois: The Charles T. Powner Co., 1951) pp. 194, 195.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
18.04.202515:19
Dr. Peter S. Ruckman on Ancient Baal Worship (Part 1)
Dr. Ruckman, commenting on Revelation 2:20 says, “This verse shows the cause of the church leaving its first works. This woman, in the local church historically, is called ‘Jezebel.’ Any real Bible student understands exactly who she is. It is a reference to the ‘Jezebel’ of the Book of Kings; she was a prophetess, a religious leader, who followed the Babylonian worship of Baal with its attendant ‘queen of heaven’ and the whole pagan works.
This woman of Thyatira is teaching things that are wrong, and of course, as Jezebel, we can immediately identify her doctrine by what it typifies in the Old Testament. Let the Holy Spirit give you the references very briefly; it will be the eye opener and shocker of your life. Notice:
Genesis 49:17—The tribe of Dan is called a serpent.
Deuteronomy 33:22—Dan is called a lion’s whelp.
The tribe of Dan is like unto a lion and a serpent. If you know your Bible, you know who this typifies. Satan is called a serpent in Genesis 3 and a lion in 1 Peter 5.
Judges 18—The tribe of Dan gets a young man to be a priest for its tribe.
Judges 18:19—This priest is called ‘father.’
Judges 18:20—This ‘father’ takes care of idols and uses them as an aid to worship.
Judges 18:28—The tribe of Dan settles up near Zidon and Tyre on the Phoenician coast.
Judges 18:30–31—They (Dan) are in total apostasy for nearly one thousand years. Up by Zidon, where the Phoenicians live, we find the tribe of Dan mixing with the heathen, and with priests called ‘father,’ who use idols as an aid to worship. Nobody has any doubt about Zidon. In Genesis 10:19 you are told that Hamites (Canaanites) settled in this part of the country, and set up Baal worship.
1 Kings 16:29–33—Ahab takes over, marries the daughter of the king of the Zidonians, and serves Baal, the Phoenician god. Here is Jezebel herself in the same passage.
1 Kings 18:26—If that weren’t enough, in this Baal worship carried on in Phoenicia, connected with the tribe of Dan, we find that these people
worshipped from 10 (or 11) in the morning to 12 noon.
1 Kings 18:24–25—They worshipped the fire of the sun; they worshipped the sun god, on his day—“Sunday.”
1 Kings 18:28—These black robed priests called ‘father,’ mutilate themselves and do penance to pay for their sins. They mutilate their bodies to try to get what they want from God.
2 Kings 10:22—These black robed, Baalite priests, called ‘fathers,’ who are in the tribe of Dan, who conduct the Phoenician Baal worship for Ahab and Jezebel, wear long robes called vestments. Consequently, they have vestries and vestrymen for the vestments.
Jeremiah 10:1–5—These people, who worship Baal, the sun god (on Dec. 25 as his birthday), worship him with a tree cut out of the forest by the hands of the axeman, and ‘deck the halls with boughs of holly, tra la la la la la la la la.’
Jeremiah 44:17–19, 25—They bake cakes to a female deity whom they call, quaintly (exactly what Papa Paul calls her!), ‘the queen of heaven,’ clearly identifying the Phoenician Baal worship for what it is. Phoenician Baal worship from North Africa, through the sons of Ham, with its black robed priests called ‘fathers,’ connected with the tribe of Dan, worships Sunday from 10 or 11 a.m. to 12 noon and observes Christmas. These are the original worshippers of the Antichrist. They are the Devil’s crowd. This is not a Dark Age superstition or Protestant bigotism. This is Scripture with Scripture, without anybody interpreting anything. All you have to do is read the passages… Many people do not know that the present ‘Catholic’ Church is the twentieth-century duplicate of the original North African, Hamitic, Baal worshippers of Phoenicia. Many ‘Catholics’ do not know this because they will not study the Bible.”
-The Bible Believer’s Commentary Series: The Book of Revelation by Peter S. Ruckman, pages 80-83.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Dr. Ruckman, commenting on Revelation 2:20 says, “This verse shows the cause of the church leaving its first works. This woman, in the local church historically, is called ‘Jezebel.’ Any real Bible student understands exactly who she is. It is a reference to the ‘Jezebel’ of the Book of Kings; she was a prophetess, a religious leader, who followed the Babylonian worship of Baal with its attendant ‘queen of heaven’ and the whole pagan works.
This woman of Thyatira is teaching things that are wrong, and of course, as Jezebel, we can immediately identify her doctrine by what it typifies in the Old Testament. Let the Holy Spirit give you the references very briefly; it will be the eye opener and shocker of your life. Notice:
Genesis 49:17—The tribe of Dan is called a serpent.
Deuteronomy 33:22—Dan is called a lion’s whelp.
The tribe of Dan is like unto a lion and a serpent. If you know your Bible, you know who this typifies. Satan is called a serpent in Genesis 3 and a lion in 1 Peter 5.
Judges 18—The tribe of Dan gets a young man to be a priest for its tribe.
Judges 18:19—This priest is called ‘father.’
Judges 18:20—This ‘father’ takes care of idols and uses them as an aid to worship.
Judges 18:28—The tribe of Dan settles up near Zidon and Tyre on the Phoenician coast.
Judges 18:30–31—They (Dan) are in total apostasy for nearly one thousand years. Up by Zidon, where the Phoenicians live, we find the tribe of Dan mixing with the heathen, and with priests called ‘father,’ who use idols as an aid to worship. Nobody has any doubt about Zidon. In Genesis 10:19 you are told that Hamites (Canaanites) settled in this part of the country, and set up Baal worship.
1 Kings 16:29–33—Ahab takes over, marries the daughter of the king of the Zidonians, and serves Baal, the Phoenician god. Here is Jezebel herself in the same passage.
1 Kings 18:26—If that weren’t enough, in this Baal worship carried on in Phoenicia, connected with the tribe of Dan, we find that these people
worshipped from 10 (or 11) in the morning to 12 noon.
1 Kings 18:24–25—They worshipped the fire of the sun; they worshipped the sun god, on his day—“Sunday.”
1 Kings 18:28—These black robed priests called ‘father,’ mutilate themselves and do penance to pay for their sins. They mutilate their bodies to try to get what they want from God.
2 Kings 10:22—These black robed, Baalite priests, called ‘fathers,’ who are in the tribe of Dan, who conduct the Phoenician Baal worship for Ahab and Jezebel, wear long robes called vestments. Consequently, they have vestries and vestrymen for the vestments.
Jeremiah 10:1–5—These people, who worship Baal, the sun god (on Dec. 25 as his birthday), worship him with a tree cut out of the forest by the hands of the axeman, and ‘deck the halls with boughs of holly, tra la la la la la la la la.’
Jeremiah 44:17–19, 25—They bake cakes to a female deity whom they call, quaintly (exactly what Papa Paul calls her!), ‘the queen of heaven,’ clearly identifying the Phoenician Baal worship for what it is. Phoenician Baal worship from North Africa, through the sons of Ham, with its black robed priests called ‘fathers,’ connected with the tribe of Dan, worships Sunday from 10 or 11 a.m. to 12 noon and observes Christmas. These are the original worshippers of the Antichrist. They are the Devil’s crowd. This is not a Dark Age superstition or Protestant bigotism. This is Scripture with Scripture, without anybody interpreting anything. All you have to do is read the passages… Many people do not know that the present ‘Catholic’ Church is the twentieth-century duplicate of the original North African, Hamitic, Baal worshippers of Phoenicia. Many ‘Catholics’ do not know this because they will not study the Bible.”
-The Bible Believer’s Commentary Series: The Book of Revelation by Peter S. Ruckman, pages 80-83.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
07.04.202519:55
Roman Catholicism is Ancient Baal Worship
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
01.04.202501:17
Alex Jones Praises a Jew-Baiting Jesuit
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
दिखाया गया 1 - 24 का 125
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।