Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
Ecce Verbum avatar
Ecce Verbum
Ecce Verbum avatar
Ecce Verbum
21.04.202500:23
Eucharist (against gnosticism)
St. Iraeneus of Lyons

“While they were eating, Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples said, ‘Take and eat; this is my body.’ Then he took a cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which will be shed on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins.’” Matthew 26:26–27

In his famous work, Against Heresies, St. Irenaeus ( against the heresy of Gnosticism, which denied the goodness of the material creation. To demonstrate the error of the Gnostics, Irenaeus turns to the Eucharist. First, he points out that Jesus gave “directions to His disciples to offer to God the first-fruits of His own, created things” so that “they might be themselves neither unfruitful nor ungrateful.” He goes on to explain: “[Jesus] took that created thing, bread, and gave thanks, and said, ‘This is My body.’ And the cup likewise, which is part of that creation to which we belong, He confessed to be His blood.”

Further commenting on this passage, Irenaeus insists that the Church’s eucharistic celebration fulfills the oracle of the prophet Malachi: “For from the rising of the sun to its setting my name will be great among the nations, and in every place incense will be offered to my name, and a pure offering” (Mal
1:11). The eucharist—which employs material things—constitutes a “pure offering.”

For Irenaeus, then, Jesus’ institution of the Eucharist directly contradicts the false teaching of the Gnostics, since the sacrament underscores the inherent goodness of the physical world. As Irenaeus would say elsewhere, “Our way of thinking is attuned to the Eucharist, and the Eucharist in turn confirms our way of thinking.”


🔗Summary by Michael Barber with the use of Irenaeus, Against all Heresies 4.17-18, in Ante Nicene Fathers vol. 1, ed. Alexander Robertson and James Donaldson (Peabody, MA: Henrickson Publishing, 2012 [1885]), 484.

#eucharist
14.04.202521:52
Worship and oblation
Thomas Howard

This divine love is such that not only does God give Himself to us and for us but, unimaginably, takes us into this very mystery of self-giving and makes us one with His Son, calling us the very Body of this Son who offers Himself to the Father .The bread of the Eucharist is the Body of Christ, and the Church is the Body of Christ; and that Body — both Christ’s personal body and his Body the Church –like bread, has only one reason for being: to be broken and given. All is offering; all is sacrifice; all is oblation. Worship without oblation is no worship. (Evangelical is Not Enough, Nashville: Nelson, 1984, 93-94)

#eucharist
22.03.202520:59
The Soul of the Embryo: An Enquiry into the Status of the Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition (2004)
David Albert Jones

#ethics
13.03.202515:17
Does “turn the other cheek” mean not to rebuke any offender?

We need to pray and make reparations for the blasphemies and sacrileges committed. However, we should also energetically rebuke the offenders by instructing them that what they are doing is wrong and that they should stop mocking our faith.

Jesus’ teaching about ‘turning the other cheek’ in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew
5:38-39) refers to not being vengeful, to never repay evil with evil, as Saint Paul also teaches in Romans 12:17.21.
Nevertheless, Jesus also rebuked and drove the sellers and the moneychangers out of the Temple with a whip, overturning their tables (Mark
11:15-16) (John 2:14-16). So, when someone mocks or shows irreverence toward our faith, we cannot remain silent as if nothing has happened. Instead, we should call their attention by telling them that what they are doing is wrong and that they should stop doing such things. We should rightfully rebuke them, but without insulting them or mocking them in return; otherwise, we would be sinning by repaying evil with evil.

Let’s also recall that Jesus responded when He was slapped in the face (John
18:22-23). That was a slap to the Face of God. Therefore, when our Lord is slapped, we cannot remain silent. Furthermore, ‘Admonishing the Sinner’ and ‘Instructing the Ignorant’ are some of the spiritual works of mercy.

(By Francisco Figueroa)


#charity
08.02.202523:14
Transubstantiation and Christ’s Substantial Presence in the Eucharist
Lawrence Feingold

Lecture

🔗source

#eucharist
08.02.202521:25
The Mystery of Israel and the Church, Vol. II - Things New and Old (2010)
Lawrence Feingold

#church #judaism
20.04.202513:57
Jesus of Nazareth
Holy Week: From the Entrance Into Jerusalem To The Resurrection

Benedict XVI

Why was Jesus rejected by the religious leaders of his day? Who was responsible for his death? Did he establish a Church to carry on his work? How did Jesus view his suffering and death? How should we? And, most importantly, did Jesus really rise from the dead and what does his resurrection mean? The story of Jesus raises many crucial questions.
Benedict brings to his study the vast learning of a brilliant scholar, the passionate searching of a great mind, and the deep compassion of a pastor's heart. In the end, he dares readers to grapple with the meaning of Jesus' life, teaching, death, and resurrection.


#christology
10.04.202520:03
Principles of Economics (2007)
Carl Menger

#economics
20.03.202522:28
The Fundamental Principles of Christian Ethics (1896)
Rev. James Joseph Conway

#ethics
13.02.202518:35
The historical case for the "Apocrypha"
Dave Armstrong

🔗source: Biblical Defense of Catholicism (2012)

#scripture
08.02.202522:22
The Eucharist - Mystery of Presence, Sacrifice and Communion (2018)
Lawrence Feingold

#eucharist
08.02.202513:40
Patriotism needs a higher dedication
Rev. William J. Philbin

Patriotism must be viewed reasonably and critically. We should first of all see it in its context, in its relation to our responsibilities generally. It is all-important to recognise that devotion to one's country is not an absolute value in life, a law unto itself, the source of dictates and demands admitting no subordination to other interests. It is not to be classed as equal to, or above, our duty to God. It is not a religion or a substitute for religion: we should be clear on this in times when political ideals, good and bad, so often usurp the place of religion. It is not an ultimate goal of action. It is a force that should be directed towards God within the framework of His law, an effort to fulfil His will by perfecting the human society He has created through the promotion of justice and good government and community well-being generally. Only so will it be integrated into a Christian life and become a Christian virtue.

It is sometimes suggested that death for one's country of itself establishes a right to Heaven; but in fact it is only when such a sacrifice is ultimately given to God that it can have any supernatural value whatever. To any works that are not directed towards God, however admirable they may appear, Our Lord's words of those who have acted for worldly motives apply: 'Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward. If we keep clearly in mind that service of our country is ultimately to be offered to God we shall not need to be told that only those activities which are pleasing to God, that is, morally right, should be undertaken under its inspiration. 'Patriotism is not enough. Even though it may occupy the major part of one's thoughts, as is legitimate and laudable in those who give themselves to public affairs, it will not be as an autonomous element in Life but as subject to higher principles. It will take on a special colouring by reason of its dedication to higher purposes. ' All whatsoever you do in word or in work, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. (Col. 3, 17). This is Christian patriotism, subordinated to higher values and gaining merit from association with them. It is a rational, balanced, though none the less warm-hearted and generous devotion to the interests of the community to which one belongs.

Like the virtue of charity from which it derives it 'is patient, is kind, is not envious, does not deal perversely, is not puffed up, is not ambitious, is not provoked to anger. (I Cor. 13, 4-5).

🔗source: Patriotism, Rev. William J. Philbin

#patriotism
20.04.202503:41
The Concept of Miracle from St. Augustine to Modern Apologetics (1954)
John A. Hardon, S.J.

#miracle

🔗
26.03.202516:15
A Course of Instructions for Converts (1928)
Bishop Shine

#converts
16.03.202503:10
Early Christianity and Greek Paideia (1961)
Werner Wilhelm Jaeger

Note:
This small book, the last work of a world-renowned scholar, has established itself as a classic. It provides a superb overview of the vast historical process by which Christianity was Hellenized and Hellenic civilization became Christianized. Jaeger shows that without the large postclassical expansion of Greek culture the rise of a Christian world religion would have been impossible. He explains why the Hellenization of Christianity was necessary in apostolic and postapostalic times; points out similarities between Greek philosophy and Christian belief; discuss such key figures as Clement, Origen, and Gregory of Nyssa; and touches on the controversies that led to the ultimate complex synthesis of Greek and Christian thought. There are judgments on every page which provoke reflection and gratitude.


#history #earlychurch
08.02.202523:31
Early Church Fathers on the Eucharist and the Liturgy
Lawrence Feingold

Questions and Answers

The Q&A includes a number of very good questions, also from a Protestant point of view, why having Holy Orders is essential for a valid Eucharist and more.

🔗source

#eucharist
08.02.202521:25
The Mystery of Israel and the Church, Vol. I - Figure and Fulfillment (2010)
Lawrence Feingold

#church #judaism
08.02.202512:40
Augustine believed in eucharistic adoration, which proves that he accepted a real, physical presence of Jesus in the Eucharist

“And fall down before His footstool: for He is holy.” What are we to fall down before? His footstool. What is under the feet is called a footstool, in Greek uποπoδιον, in Latin Scabellum or Suppedaneum. But consider, brethren, what he commandeth us to fall down before. In another passage of the Scriptures it is said, “The heaven is My throne, and the earth is My footstool.” Doth he then bid us worship the earth, since in another passage it is said, that it is God’s footstool? How then shall we worship the earth, when the Scripture saith openly, “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God”? Yet here it saith, “fall down before His footstool:” and, explaining to us what His footstool is, it saith, “The earth is My footstool.” I am in doubt; I fear to worship the earth, lest He who made the heaven and the earth condemn me; again, I fear not to worship the footstool of my Lord, because the Psalm biddeth me, “fall down before His footstool.” I ask, what is His footstool? and the Scripture telleth me, “the earth is My footstool.” In hesitation I turn unto Christ, since I am herein seeking Himself: and I discover how the earth may be worshipped without impiety, how His footstool may be worshipped without impiety. For He took upon Him earth from earth; because flesh is from earth, and He received flesh from the flesh of Mary. And because He walked here in very flesh, and gave that very flesh to us to eat for our salvation; and no one eateth that flesh, unless he hath first worshipped: we have found out in what sense such a footstool of our Lord’s may be worshipped, and not only that we sin not in worshipping it, but that we sin in not worshipping. (Exposition on Psalm XCIX, 8; NPNF 1, Vol. VIII)


St. Augustine’s theme of the “footstool” of God can be seen several times in Holy Scripture (1 Chr 28:2; Ps 99:5; 132:7; Is 66:1; Mt 5:35; Acts 7:49). Protestant historian Philip Schaff commented on the acceptance of adoration of the consecrated host in the doctrine of the fathers:

As to the adoration of the consecrated elements: This follows with logical necessity from the doctrine of transubstantiation, and is the sure touchstone of it . . . Chrysostom says: “The wise men adored Christ in the manger; we see him not in the manger, but on the altar, and should pay him still greater homage.” Theodoret, in the passage already cited, likewise uses the term proskuvnei’n [Greek for “worship”], but at the same time expressly asserts the continuance of the substance of the elements. Ambrose speaks once of the flesh of Christ “which we to-day adore in the mysteries,” and Augustine, of an adoration preceding the participation of the flesh of Christ. (History of the Christian Church, vol. 3, chapter 7, § 95. The Sacrament of the Eucharist; 501-502)


The worship of Jesus as the sacrificial Lamb in Scripture is also analogous to eucharistic adoration, in its rich Passover imagery:

1 Corinthians 5:7
 Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our paschal lamb, has been sacrificed.
Revelation 5:8; 12-13 And when he had taken the scroll, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and with golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints; . . . [12] saying with a loud voice, “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing!” [13] And I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and in the sea, and all therein, saying, “To him who sits upon the throne and to the Lamb be blessing and honor and glory and might for ever and ever!”
Revelation 22:3 There shall no more be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and his servants shall worship him;

🔗source: Patheos, Eucharistic Adoration: Idolatry or Biblical? (vs. Calvin #47)

#eucharist
15.04.202511:48
On Auricular Confession to a Priest

Catholics are collectively asking God for forgiveness of sins as a constant practise at every mass. They are free to confess any sins which are not subjectively mortal, or grave, directly to God (penitential act during mass) and receive a general absolution. But if one commits a subjectively mortal sin, then it’s required that they are contrite, confess it to a priest, who then offers formal sacramental absolution. 

Psalm 32:5 I acknowledged my sin to thee, and I did not hide my iniquity; I said, “I will confess my transgressions to the LORD”; then thou didst forgive the guilt of my sin.

But there was also formal forgiveness and atonement in ancient Israel.

Ezra was a priest (Ezra 7:11), and in this instance was praying to God as an intermediary for his people, not because of his own sin, but theirs (much like a Catholic priest offering absolution).The widespread sin was taking on wives of foreigners who served false gods (Ezra 9:1-2). The rest of this chapter (9:3-17) and the beginning of the next (10: 1-6) shows Ezra in great distress, praying for his people, which is a constant motif in the Old Testament: the holy men praying that God would forgive sinners. Ezra had offered the “evening sacrifice” during this time (9:5), which was the formal way to receive forgiveness of sins in the Mosaic OT system of law. Ezra 10:1 reports that “Ezra prayed and made confession”.
We see Moses doing the same thing (Ex
32:30-32). A priest in confession acts as an agent of dispensing God’s forgiveness through formal absolution.

Leviticus 5:5-6 and 19:21-22 show a remarkably similar process to the Catholic sacrament of reconciliation (contrition, followed by confession and absolution and assigned penance).
A search for “priest” and “atonement” appearing together in the OT yielded 28 matches in Leviticus and Numbers. King David, as a Jew, took part in this. We see that he “he sacrificed an ox and a fatling” (2 Sam 6:13) and “offered burnt offerings and peace offerings before the LORD” (2 Sam 6:17). Thus, apart from his confession directly to God, he also had to participate in the OT sacrificial system of atonement for sins, which bears an uncanny resemblance to Catholic confession and absolution (minus the animal sacrifice).

The New Testament develops and continues this thought. With John the Baptist, people came “confessing their sins” (Mt 3:6; Mk 1:5) and being baptized, which entailed a “repentance for the forgiveness of sins” (Mk 1:4). The water of baptism took their sins away just as the sacrament of absolution wipes away sins.

Disciples were the type and foreshadowing of priests:

Matthew
16:19 “I will give you [Peter] the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Matthew
18:18 Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. (cf. John 20:22-23 above)

Confession (possibly to men) is shown in the book of Acts:

Acts
19:18 Many also of those who were now believers came, confessing and divulging their practices. (cf. 1 Jn 1:8-9)

The “came” in this passage suggests that they confessed to Paul or possibly to him and/or to the public assembly. Otherwise, it seems that the text would have simply stated that they confessed, not that they “came” to where Paul was to do so.

#confession
22.03.202521:28
Teach Like a Champion 3.0 - 63 Techniques that Put Students on the Path to College (2021)
Doug Lemov

#education
13.03.202521:12
Saint Louis
Jacques Le Goff

In this work, Jacques LeGoff, one of the truly great medieval historians of our times, magisterially plumbs the depths of the fundamental contradiction of Saint Louis: is it possible to be both a king and a saint?

Canonized in 1297 as Saint Louis, King Louis IX of France (1214–1270) was the central figure of Christendom in the thirteenth century. He ruled when France was at the height of power; he commanded the largest army in Europe and controlled the wealthiest kingdom. Renowned for his patronage of the arts, Louis was equally famous for his decision to imitate the suffering Christ as a humbly attired, bearded penitent.
Le Goff describes the scholastic and intellectual background of Louis’ reign and, most importantly, he discusses methodology and the interpretation of written sources—their composition, provenance, and reliability.

#saints #history
08.02.202523:31
Early Church Fathers on the Eucharist and the Liturgy
Lawrence Feingold

Lecture


Feingold first presents what we know about the early liturgy of the Church, and its continuity with the liturgy of the synagogue. Then, starting in the first century, and ending with St. John Chrysostum in the late fourth century, he shows that the Fathers believed and taught the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, the ecclesial dimension of the Eucharist, the sanctifying power of the Eucharist, and the sacrificial aspect of the Eucharist. He shows that the idea of transubstantiation was present in the Fathers, and was not a medieval novelty. 

🔗source

#eucharist
08.02.202521:25
The Mystery of Israel and the Church, Vol. III - The Messianic Kingdom of Israel (2010)
Lawrence Feingold

#church #judaism
08.02.202512:22
The Education of a Christian Prince (2003)
Erasmus of Rotterdam

"The problem Erasmus sets himself in The Education of a Christian Prince, given this commitment to, and support for, the status quo is how to ensure that those born to rule are educated so as to govern justly and benevolently, and so that the prince’s rule never degenerates into oppression".

#education
दिखाया गया 1 - 24 का 48
अधिक कार्यक्षमता अनलॉक करने के लिए लॉगिन करें।