Proxy MTProto
Proxy MTProto
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
Proxy MTProto
Proxy MTProto
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
Victorian Network avatar
Victorian Network
Victorian Network avatar
Victorian Network
30.04.202518:59
☦️ Galatians 3 Proves Christian Identity

Gal. 3:15-18

Brothers and sisters, I speak in terms of human relations: even though it is only a man’s covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one sets it aside or adds conditions to it.
Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as one would in referring to many, but rather as in referring to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ.
What I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.
For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise.


The promises were made ONLY to Abraham's seed (descendants). Passed down through Isaac, then to Esau (who sold his birthright), then to Jacob who would be renamed Israel and spawn the 12 tribes of Israel. The Law does not invalidate, replace, or change Abraham's covenant with God (additionally, Gal. 3:19-21).

Europeans are a mix of Japhethites and Shemites, and as it was foretold even before Abraham, Japheth would dwell in the tents of Shem (Gen. 9:27).

What is meant by tent here? The Hebrew is אֹהֶל, which can plainly mean tent or also mean the Tabernacle, a holy place where God dwelled with the Israelites.

Now when we read the infamous Gal. 3:28-29, it makes much more sense:

There is neither [Israelite] nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants [literal], heirs according to promise.


Paul's own missionary work leads us then to the conclusion that every people he preached to were undoubtedly White and that the promise was to White people. Being either Japhethites, Shemites, or a mix of both.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ Love Thy Neighbor?

We are often called as Christians to, as Christ said, "Love thy neighbor as yourself." (Matt. 22:39).

But what does this mean? Is this supposed to be a call to love any neighbor, no matter their ethnic or religious affiliation?

Of course not. Christ pulled most of his teachings from the Old Testament, and there is a parallel to loving thy neighbor in Lev. 19:18. In Leviticus, it takes on a much more ethnic meaning:

You shall not take vengeance, nor hold any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the Lord.


All context here points to it being ethnic. Leviticus was given only to the Israelites and the Hebrew does not reveal any sort of universalist messaging.

Thus, the more accurate version would be, "Love thy racial kinsman."

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
Your Godfather, Hitler?
📸 Hitler With Young Children (1936)

According to an issue of Neues Volk, a magazine ran by the NSDAP's Office of Racial Policy, Adolf Hitler could become your godfather! The requirements were as follows:

• The family has to be genetically healthy
• Only after the seventh living son (or the ninth living child) will godfathership be considered
• The parents have to have a strong conviction in National Socialism

Though there were no guaranteed benefits from Hitler becoming the godfather of a child, government agencies would look out for the child and their life would be made easy. There was also a chance the Führer would give monetary support.

Source: Calvin University

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
14.04.202521:31
☦️ Was Lot a "Holy" Man? II

I wanted to get the full story out of the way so we can establish a few things:

1. Lot was not called "holy" but rather righteous and tormented by the actions of those in Sodom (2 Pet. 2:8)
2. Lot's daughters were not children, nobody can determine their age because it isn't stated
3. God did not approve of the incest

Abraham, because Lot is his nephew, keeps pleading with God over and over to spare the city. He keeps bargaining and eventually God agrees that if there are even ten righteous people in Sodom, He will not destroy it (Gen. 18:22-33). But ultimately, there aren't.

We can infer from this then that the only righteous people left in Sodom were Lot and his family, and that was in comparison to the Sodomites, because no other "righteous" people existed there.

As for the children born of this incestuous relationship (Moabites, Ammonites), they were incredibly hated by God and a thorn in the side of the Israelites. The Moabites were cursed (Isa. 16:6-14; Jer. 48; Ezk. 25:8-11), they lead the Israelites into idolatry and sexual immorality (Num. 25:1-3), were defeated by David (2 Sam. 8:2) and so on. The same thing goes for Ammonites.

Lastly, something particularly damning is the exclusion of Moabites and Ammonites forever (Neh. 13:1-3).

In conclusion, Lot was only righteous as far as Sodom's standards were. Him and his family's sense of morality and judgement were corrupted by the Sodomites. Nowhere is he called a holy man though we should definitely learn from his story.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
02.04.202519:01
☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? IV
🖼 Eos and Memnon (King of Ethiopia) (BC 490-480~)
🖼 Achilles kills Memnon (BC ?)

So what am I getting at here? To have burnt skin implies a previous state of having light skin. Otherwise, the Greeks could've used the other words they had to describe the swarthiness or darkness of Aethiopians.

While I will freely admit there is nothing wholly concrete
, the examples of White Aethiopians going extinct and becoming our modern African Ethiopians may simply be an example of losing racial purity over time. Ham's descendants are thought to have inhabited Egypt and Africa (Psa. 78:51; 105:23; 105:27; 106:22; 1 Chr. 4:40). Inevitably, if they were racially pure at one point, they are all mixed by now. This idea is a likely answer to the Ethiopian Church question.

For the Eunuch in Acts, read this article.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
08.05.202522:04
☦️ Christianity Teaches You To Love Your Race. Paganism Doesn't.

We learn in 1 John 4:20:

If someone says, “I love God,” and yet he hates his brother[1] or sister, he is a liar; for the one who does not love his brother and sister whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen.


1. Thayer's Lexicon teaches us that "brother" (ἀδελφός) is not only referring to a literal brother, but a fellow Israelite, in the same ethnic sense that love thy neighbor is being used.

And again in Matt. 22:36-40

“Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it[2], ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ Upon these two commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets.”


2. All Greek lexicons once again demonstrate that "...second is like it" (ὅμοιος) means, "like, equivalent to, of the same rank".

So both commands here are to love our race. And if we do not love our race, we cannot truly love God. This is supported by Rom. 13:8-10; Gal. 5:14; James 2:8-9. In Romans, it even goes as far as to say as long we love our [racial] neighbor we are fulfilling the law.

Meanwhile in Norse paganism, brothers and extended family will kill each other during Raganarok for the gods[3].

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
Reposted from:
Kinism avatar
Kinism
Happy Easter!

Today, we remember the atoning death of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. On the third day, He rose again, conquering sin and death. His work was not to reject creation, as the Gnostics so claim, but to restore and redeem it. In His resurrection, all of creation is reconciled, including our natural bonds with our kin.

☩ He is risen!
He is risen, indeed!

@Kinism
The European Youth Association
📇 Postcard for the European Youth Association (1942)

The European Youth Association, or as it was known in German, "Europäischen Jugendverband", was founded in 1942 in Vienna as part of an initiative to spread National Socialism all across Europe. It was a cultural exchange for the Axis and included many countries such as Italy, Spain, Denmark, Romania, Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, etc.

Approximately 300 young leaders from across Europe met in Vienna, where Baldur von Schirach and Renato Ricci were proclaimed honorary presidents, while Artur Axmann and Aldo Vidussoni were effective presidents. Female leaders included Germany's Jutta Rüdiger, Italy's Penelope Testa and Spain's Mary Pilar Primo de Rivera.

Sadly, as the war turned for the worse, the European Youth Association's importance was lessened until it eventually fizzled out and died with the Third Reich.

Sources: German Article, German Interview

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ Was Lot a "Holy" Man?
🖼 Lot and his Daughters leaving Sodom (1615)

A rarer but still used example of the supposed Jewishness of the Old Testament is the story of Lot and his daughters.

In Genesis 19, we find two angels had visited Lot in Sodom (Gen. 19:1) and that the corrupt men of Sodom came to rape the angels or possibly what they just viewed to be two men (Gen 19:4-5). So Lot offers up his daughters trying to appease the mob but the men become more enraged as a result (Gen. 19:8-11).

The angels tell Lot to take his family and leave as they are about to destroy Sodom (Gen. 19:12-13). Lot's wife famously becomes a pillar of salt for looking back at Sodom (Gen. 19:26) and then Lot takes himself and his daughters into a cave (Gen. 19:30) where they convince him to drink wine and, believing he is the only man left on Earth, have sex with him (Gen. 19:33-38).

The entire story sucks, obviously, so why was Lot called righteous (2 Pet. 2:7-9)?

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? III
🖼 King Ezana Mural, Ura Kidane Mehret (AD 1500~?)

Modern scholarship does not like this theory[1]. Yet I believe we can get to the bottom of this objectively. Cepheus, the ancient Ethiopian king in the last post, was called "Iasid Cepheus" because of his Argive or Greek ancestry[2]. We have a mid-first century AD document detailing the Aksumite rulers' Hellenization and adoption of Greek. This would later be used heavily in their coinage[3].

Ezana's son, Mehadeyis, might've been mentioned twice in comparison to Ares and Dionysus by Nonnus[4]. And Ezana, before converting, worshipped parallel Aksumite-Greek gods[5].

The church there would be founded on Alexandrian church practices, translating the Bible from Greek into Ge'ez[6][7]. And we shouldn't forget that the word Aethiopian comes from the words αἴθω and ὤψ, literally meaning to burn in the face[8]. Which is interesting since Greek has other words for dark-skinned or black[9][10].

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
07.05.202505:37
☦️ Was Jesus Hunchbacked?

"…a man of simple appearance, mature age, dark skin, small staturethree cubits high, hunchbacked, with a long facelong nose, and meeting eyebrows, so that they who see him might be affrighted, with scanty hair (but) having a line in the middle of the head after the fashion of the Nazireans, and with an undeveloped beard."


This description is sometimes thrown around as what Josephus described Christ to look like. However, this actually comes from Robert Eisler, an Austrian Jew who used the Slavonic translation of Josephus' works. Since pagans love to talk about existing manuscripts, the oldest existing manuscript of the "Slavonic Josephus" dates to AD 1463.

This description, of course, does not exist in Josephus' original work. The cope will then be that Isaiah 52 and 53 support this description, but the descriptions there only support what Christ looks like AFTER crucifixion. More on this soon.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
28.04.202518:05
☦️ Isaiah 56 Proves Christian Identity

Sometimes pagans will use Isaiah 56's "inclusive" nature to disprove Christian Identity. I'll quote the relevant verses in one go so we can take a look:

Let not the foreigner who has joined himself to the Lord say,
“The Lord will certainly separate me from His people.”
...
“Also the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord,
To attend to His service and to love the name of the Lord,
To be His servants, every one who keeps the Sabbath so as not to profane it,
And holds firmly to My covenant;
...
Their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be acceptable on My altar
...
For My house will be called a house of prayer for all the peoples.”
The Lord God, who gathers the dispersed of Israel, declares,
“I will yet gather others to them, to those already gathered.”


If you pay any amount of attention to what's being said here, you cannot help but come out with a stronger CI view. We can start with a "foreigner" being concerned that God will separate him from His people. But to be separated implies at one point you were in a state of being whole. This is affirmed in the Hebrew, where בָּדל means "to separate, divide, distinguish, set apart".

So in actuality what's being said here is that the "foreigner" (to the Law) is concerned that he won't receive salvation like the Israelites. But God makes it clear: whoever keeps to His covenant is saved.

Which begs the question: how can a foreigner keep to the covenant if he was not already part of it?

And while the verse about God's house being a house of prayer for all the peoples seems to contradict this entire narrative, we must not forget directly after that God is gathering the dispersed of Israel to those already gathered. Not the dispersed of mankind, not the dispersed of those who choose to believe, but the dispersed of the Israelites.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
20.04.202511:01
🇩🇪 Happy birthday to one of the most important men to have ever lived — Adolf Hitler!

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
15.04.202518:38
☦️ USSR Loved Christ Are Jeets?

First, much of their proof comes from an article by the Boris Yeltsin Presidential Library. A literal Russian state owned website. Not a great start.

Then they show some Discord screenshots of quotes from a book roughly translated as "The Executioners of St. Luke. Reflections on the Centenary of the October 1917 Revolution." which are supposed to show Lenin and Stalin supporting Christianity. The problems:

1. The link given (https://books.google.co.in/books?id=nadxDwAAQBAJ&pg=512#v=onepage&q&f=false) is from INDIA. ".co.in" is an Indian website ending. These guys are actual jeets?

2. See where it says &pg=512? That's to try and send you to page 512 of the book. But the book does not allow itself to be searched through by page. Try it.

3. The book only has 480 pages. How can their proof be sending us to page 512?

4. Lenin "ending" persecution on the Church directly contradicts his own opinion and the historical record.

5. If we translate the book's synopsis, it is actually clearly against communism.

They provide cropped quotes from the Wikipedia page on the League of Militant Atheists. In a very Jewish manner, they do not show the full context of why Stalin disbanded it, which was to gain war support. Earlier in the LMG's history, Stalin ordered 5 year plan in 1932 to "eliminate the Church and its influence in the USSR".

Also, that quote about Stalin and the Catholic Church is unsourced and incredibly neutral in language.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
07.04.202519:05
☦️ The Councils of Toledo II

In A.D. 654, the now completed Visigothic Code was a set of laws that highly oppressed Jews[4].

Jews were prevented from practicing many things according to their custom
such as Passover, marriage, dividing food into clean and unclean, practicing circumcision, etc. They were unable to defend their religion against attacks from Christians, unable to read books against Christianity, unable to escape baptism for themselves or their children, and were given a book detailing the crimes of their faith. If a Jew was caught reading a book that was against Christianity, he could either have his head shaved or be lashed 100 times. Priests and judges who neglected properly enforcing laws against Jews were excommunicated for 3-6 months and fined.

The succeeding councils reaffirmed this until the Seventeenth Council of Toledo in A.D. 694 where things got harsher[5].

King Egica announced he had learned of a conspiracy between Spanish and North African Jews to assist the Muslim armies in conquering Iberia. Thus, all Jews other than those residing in Narbonensis were to be made slaves and given to Christian masters in different parts of the kingdom who were to try and convert them fully to Christianity. Their property was to be confiscated and any children under the age of seven were taken from their parents.


In A.D. 711, General Tariq ibn Zayid took Toledo. It was said that, because of the intense discrimination against Jews, that the Jews opened the gates of Toledo for the Moors[6]. And indeed, Jews were assigned leadership roles in governing, investment and policymaking after the Muslim conquest. This time became known as the Golden Age (for Jews) in Spain[6].

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia? II
🖼 Cepheus, King of Ethiopia, (BC 500~)

We also have ancient accounts of the two races living in Ethiopia.

Those who dwell along the river, are black in colour and have flat noses and woolly hair... they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast... speaking as they do with a
shrill voice...
Diodorus Siculus, Library of History 3:8.1-3 (BC 60-30~)

On those shores washed by the Libyan Sea... are found the Libyan Aegyptians, the
White Aethiopians...
Pomponius Mela, Chorographia 2:1.23 (AD 43~)

[...] the Æthiopians are divided into two races... the Troglodytæ make excavations in the earth... for dwellings... serpents is their food; they have no articulate voice, but only utter a kind of squeaking noise...
Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5:8 (AD 77-79~)


But what evidence is there, if any, that this is all true?

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
03.05.202505:38
☦️ USSR Loved Jeets Are Stupid

It's honestly such low-hanging fruit that I can't help but be baited into replying.

Let me just ask this: do you think it's a coincidence that in 1847, when Marx and Engels transformed the League of the Just into the Communist League, that they called religion a "borgeois prejudice" and wrote in the Communist Manifesto that communism makes religion "superfluous" and "brings about their disappearance"?

Ultimately these people don't believe what they write on their channel anyway, it's all a waste of time. Yet, again, it's quite easy to disprove.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
25.04.202523:26
If you call your enemy uneducated, strive to intensify in yourself the love of learning and industry; if you call him a coward, rouse even more your self-reliance and manliness; if you call him unchaste and licentious, obliterate from your soul whatever trace of devotion to pleasure may be lurking there unperceived. For there is nothing more disgraceful or painful than evil-speaking that recoils upon its author.


— Plutarch, "De capienda ex inimicis utilitate"

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
18.04.202519:03
☦️ Early NS Christian Identity

While not being traditional Christian Identity (accepting the OT and NT), it is evident that the völkisch movement embraced many ideas of modern Christian Identity.

We must, however, keep in mind that these quotes focus on the extremely early NSDAP movement and are not final developments in NS Christianity. Still, it is interesting to see how many völkisch authors reflect the truths espoused on this channel.

Relying on the notion that the Israelites and the Jews were “two racially different peoples,”
Fritsch argued in The False God (1911) that the books of the biblical Prophets were the “antisemitic writings of antiquity.”
[Dinter] argued, as Fritsch had, that the Israelites were not Jewish and that the Prophets had been the voice of a subjected race battling “against foreign Jewish oppressors.” All of these writers supported the notion that Jesus was an “Aryan.”

[Liebenfels] supported the notion of Christianity as a “racial cult religion” and interpreted the Bible through a bizarre exegesis which argued that the Old Testament taught the dangers of racial admixture; which depicted Moses as a “Darwinist” and preacher of “racial morality”.

[Schrönghamer-Heimdal] claims that “Israel” was not a Jewish word but rather “ancient Aryan” (urarisch), meaning the people “of the ‘eternal Light-spirit,’ that is, the ‘people of God,’ the ‘chosen people’!” These chosen people “are and were, however, not the Jews,” but rather “the Aryan people”: “The Aryans, Arameans, Armanen, Germanic tribes are the predecessors and successors of Christ, the actual Christians who cling to the eternal Light-spirit.”

[Hitler] stated that there was a fundamental “division” between the “northern Israelite tribes” and the “nomadic” Jews “of the tribe of Judah and Caleb.” He claimed that this division had first been overcome by King David through the “cult of the god Yahweh,” and that “the Jews” had killed off the “original tribes in Palestine.”

[In 1922, Hitler] argued that Christianity was racially specific: “The Christian religion is created only for the Aryans; for other peoples it is absurd.” Shortly thereafter, he argued that “positive Christianity” meant “the sword with its grip in the shape of a cross,” not the religion that “asked one to turn the other cheek.”

— Koehne, Samuel. “Were the National Socialists a Völkisch Party? Paganism, Christianity, and the Nazi Christmas.

It is possible, in my opinion, that Hitler made certain concessions in regards to Christianity (i.e. seeing parts of it as Jewish) to earn the support of the völkisch movement.

While there may be some things in early NS Christianity that seem anti-Christian (read the paper, I didn't cover them), overall Hitler's intention seemed to be to maintain Christianity as the status-quo no matter how he needed to justify it to himself or the movement at large.

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
15.04.202517:32
☦️ Engels Did Not Like Christianity

In another pathetic attempt by the drooling retards at "USSR Loved Christ", they have tried to paint Engels as supportive of Christianity. When you look at the historical record, however, this is far from the case. Let me put this firmly to rest.

"We have seen to it that half the rules-drafting committee in Cologne consists of our own people; in Elberfeld, at least one of them was on it and, with the help of the rationalists, we succeeded at two meetings in thoroughly trouncing the pious; by a huge majority, everything Christian was banned from the rules."

Engels to Marx (1844)

"Law, morality, religion, are to him so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

Marx & Engels, Communist Manifesto (1847)

"[C]ommunism is the stage of historical development which makes all existing religions superfluous and brings about their disappearance."

Engels, Principles of Communism (1847)

"...while they [Americans] did not bring over any medieval institutions from Europe they did bring over masses of medieval traditions, religion, English common (feudal) law, superstition, spiritualism, in short every kind of imbecility which was not directly harmful to business and which is now very serviceable for making the masses stupid"

Engels to Sorge (1886)

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ The Councils of Toledo
🖼 Third Council of Toledo (1862)

The first two Catholic councils of Toledo imply there was a lack of Jews as there is no mention. The Third Council in A.D. 589 stated[1]:

"[We forbid] Jews to have Christian wives, concubines, or slaves, [order] the children of such unions to be baptized, and [disqualify] Jews from any office in which they might have to punish Christians. Christian slaves whom they had circumcised, or made to share in their rites, [are] ipso facto freed."


This would be the first of many oppressive councils to come. In between these councils, King Sisebut forced his Jewish subjects to convert in A.D. 612[2]. In A.D. 633, the Fourth Council of Toledo declared that[3]:

Children of Jews were to be sent to monasteries or Christian men or women to worship Christianity
. Jews were also not allowed to hold public office, hold Christian slaves or marry Christian women. Circumcision was seen as an abominable practice.

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
☦️ Why Was There A Church in Ethiopia?
🖼 Mural, Menelik I, Axum, Ethiopia (AD 4th century~)

Often to discredit Christian Identity, opponents will mention the Ethiopian Church and King Ezana's conversion of Ethiopia into a Christian country. This, they say, proves that early Christianity was multiracial. What if I told you it's not so simple?

In the Kebra Nagast (though a medieval document), the Ethiopian royalty claimed descent from King Solomon and Queen Sheba, with the first king of Ethiopia being Menelik I (1000 BC~).

→ NEXT

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤
Shown 1 - 24 of 47
Log in to unlock more functionality.